download.lww.comdownload.lww.com/wolterskluwer_vitalstream_com/permalink/... · web viewa...

5
Supplemental Figure 1. A representative case of diabetic macular edema (DME) with disrupted external limiting membrane (ELM) but not hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers. A 64- year-old man with DME had a worsening in the decimal best- corrected visual acuity from 0.3 to 0.15 after vitrectomy. (A, B) Preoperative optical coherence tomographic images show cystoid spaces and the mild disruption of external limiting membrane (arrow), but not hyperreflective foci in outer retinal layers at the fovea. (C, D) Fourteen months after surgery, both the external limiting membrane and the junction between inner and outer segments were severely

Upload: lamhuong

Post on 16-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Supplemental Figure 1.

A representative case of diabetic macular edema (DME) with disrupted external limiting

membrane (ELM) but not hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers. A 64-year-old

man with DME had a worsening in the decimal best-corrected visual acuity from 0.3 to

0.15 after vitrectomy. (A, B) Preoperative optical coherence tomographic images show

cystoid spaces and the mild disruption of external limiting membrane (arrow), but not

hyperreflective foci in outer retinal layers at the fovea. (C, D) Fourteen months after

surgery, both the external limiting membrane and the junction between inner and outer

segments were severely damaged, and hyperreflective foci there were present

(arrowhead). B, D are magnified versions of the inset in A, C.

 

Supplemental Figure 2.

A representative case of diabetic macular edema (DME) with   hyperreflective foci in

the outer retinal layers than intact external limiting membrane (ELM). A 74-year-old

man with DME did not have an improvement in the decimal best-corrected visual acuity

(from 0.3 to 0.2). (A, B) Preoperative optical coherence tomographic images show both

cystoid spaces and serous retinal detachment, and hyperreflective foci around the outer

segments. (C, D) Fifteen months after surgery, both the external limiting membrane and

the junction between inner and outer segments were disrupted (arrowhead). B, D are

magnified versions of the inset in A, C.

SUPPLEMENTAL TABLE 1. Changes in ELM Status after Vitrectomy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Eyes with an Intact ELM at Baseline

ELM Statusintact→disrupted

ELM statusintact→intact

P Value

Hyperreflective foci at baseline (+) 3 eyes 2 eyesHyperreflective foci at baseline (-) 2 eyes 12 eyes 0.046

ELM = external limiting membrane; hyperreflective foci = hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers; intact→disrupted = eyes in which the ELM status changed from intact at baseline to disrupted at the final visit; intact→intact = eyes in which the ELM status remained intact from baseline to the final visit.

SUPPLEMENTAL TABLE 2. The changes in hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema.

hyperreflective foci (-)→(+)

hyperreflective foci (-)→(-)

P Value

disrupted ELM at baseline 6 eyes 2 eyesintact ELM at baseline 4 eyes 10 eyes 0.035ELM = external limiting membrane; hyperreflective foci (-)→(+) = eyes in which hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers were absent at baseline, whereas they were present at final visit; hyperreflective foci (-)→(-) = eyes in which hyperreflective foci in the outer retinal layers were kept absent from baseline to final visit.