☞ two weather research and forecasting (wrf) model dynamical cores:

29
Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14- 17, 2004 1 AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NONHYDROSTATIC MODELING Zavisa Janjic, Tom Black, Mattew Pyle, Hui-ya Chuang, Eric Rogers and Geoff DiMego National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland

Upload: peri

Post on 14-Jan-2016

60 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NONHYDROSTATIC MODELING Zavisa Janjic, Tom Black, Mattew Pyle, Hui-ya Chuang, Eric Rogers and Geoff DiMego National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland. ☞ Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 1

AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NONHYDROSTATIC MODELING

Zavisa Janjic, Tom Black, Mattew Pyle,Hui-ya Chuang, Eric Rogers and Geoff DiMego

National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland

Page 2: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 2

☞ Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

● NCEP Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model (NMM)

Janjic, Gerrity and Nickovic, 2001, Monthly Weather ReviewJanjic, 2003, Meteorology and Atmospheric PhysicsBlack, Tucillo, Parallelization, Optimization, WRF standards

● NCAR Explicit Mass Core (EMC)

Klemp, Skamarock, Dudhia, 2000, OnlineWicker and Skamarock, 2002, Monthly Weather ReviewKlemp, Skamarock, Fuhrer, 2003, Monthly Weather ReviewMichalakes, 2002

Page 3: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 3

☞ The NCEP NMM

● Instead of extending cloud models to larger spatial and temporal scales, NMM built on experiences of NWP (Janjic et al., 2001; Janjic, 2003), i.e.,

- Relaxing the hydrostatic approximation, while

- Using modeling principles (Janjic, 1977, 1979, 1984)proven in NWP and regional climate applications.

● No linearizations or additional approximations required, fully compressible system(Janjic, Gerrity, Nickovic, 2001, MWR; Janjic, 2003, MAP).

● The nonhydrostatic effects as an add–on nonhydrostatic module:

- Easy comparison of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic solutions;

- Reduced computational effort at lower resolutions.

● Pressure based vertical coordinate.

Page 4: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 4

☞ Basic discretization principles set up in Janjic, 1977, Beitrage (also used in Eta):

● Conservation of major integral properties (Arakawa, “mimetic” approach, hot topic in Math);

- Controlled nonlinear energy cascade through Energy and Enstrophy conservation.

● Cancellation between contributions of the omega-alpha term and the PGF to KE, consistent transformations between KE and potential energy; ● Minimization of pressure gradient force error.

☞ Implementation of the basic principles evolved significantly over time.

● For historical reason, Arakawa E grid still in the initial NCEP formulation, more advanced B grid formulation (NMM-B) also exists (Janjic, 2003, MAP)].

Page 5: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 5

● For rotational flow and cyclic boundary conditions, horizontal momentum advection on semistaggered grids B/E conserves (Janjic 1984, MWR) appropriate finite difference analogs of:

Enstrophy as defined in terms of on Arakawa staggered grid C.

A

dAyx

22

2

2

2)(

dAxA

2

2

2)(

dA

yA

2

2

2)(

A

dAyx 2

2

2

2

A

dAxy

])()[( 22 Energy as defined in terms of on Arakawa staggered grid C and semi staggered grids B/E.

A

dAy

2)(

A

dAx

2)(

Momentum as defined in terms of on Arakawa staggered grid C and semi staggered grids B/E.

A

dAyx 2

2

2

2

dAxA

2

2dA

yA

2

2

● A number of quadratic and first order quantities conserved in case of general flow.

Page 6: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 6

● Vertical discretization, vertical coordinate, PGF error.

- Pressure-sigma hybrid (Arakawa and Lamb, 1977):

Flat coordinate surfaces at high altitudes where sigma problems worst;Higher vertical resolution over elevated terrain;No discontinuities and internal boundary conditions.

● Time stepping.

- No redundant computations, high computational efficiency!- Adams-Bashforth for horizontal advection of u, v, T and Coriolis,- Crank-Nicholson/Matsuno for vertical advection of u, v, T (60 levels).- Forward-Backward (Ames, 1968; Gadd, 1974; Janjic and Wiin-Nielsen, 1977,

JAS; Janjic 1979, Beitrage) for gravity waves.- Implicit for vertically propagating sound waves (Janjic et al., 2001, MWR).- Split forward, long time steps for physics (Janjic, 1990, MWR)

Page 7: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 7

☞ The formulation successfully reproduces classical 2D nonhydrostatic solutions.

The cold bubble test. Potential temperatures after 300 s, 600 s and 900 s in the right hand part of the integration domain extending from the center to 19200 m, and from the surface to 4600 m. The contour interval is 10 K.

10

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

5

5

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0 00

0

Potential temperature after 360 s, 540 s, 720 s and 900 s. The area shown extends 16 km along the x axis, and from 0 m to 13200 m along the z axis. The contour interval is 10K.

Page 8: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 8

-2.5

-2.5-2.5

-2.5

00000

00

0 0000

00

00 000

0

0 0 0 0

00

00

000

000 0 0 00000 000

00

0000

0000

00

00

000 000

00

00

000

000

00

00

00 00

00

00

000 0

00

0

0

0

0

000 00

0

00

0

00

0

00

00

00000000

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

00

00

00

00000

00

000

0

00

0000 000

00

2.52.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

Full Analytical (Boussinesque)

Deviation of horizontal wind from basic state (uniform 10 m s-1) after 9000 s. The area shown extends 18400 m on each side of the center of the mountain, and from 0 m to 8000 m in the vertical. The contour interval is 0.5 m s-1 and the dashed contours indicate negative values.

Page 9: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 9

☞ WRF NMM model = Nonhydrostatic dynamics+Upgraded physical package of the NCEP Eta model (Janjic 1990, 1994, MWR; Chen, Janjic and Mitchell, 1997, BLM; Janjic 2000, JAS; Janjic 2001, NCEP Office Note 437), NCAR physics as well.

● Computationally robust, reliable in operations;

● THREE TIMES faster than most established NH models, can be sped up;

● Little noise, no Rayleigh damping and associated extra computational boundary condition at the top with real data with resolutions down to 100 m.

● NWP, convective cloud runs, PBL LES, with resolutions from 50 km to 100 m;

● Operational at NCEP (small domains, initialized and driven by the Eta):

- No filtering of mountains.- HiRes Windows, Fire Weather, On Call.

● Quasi-Operationally run elsewhere.

Page 10: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 10

☞ Atmospheric spectrum.

● The WRF-NMM and the NMM-B well qualified for investigating numerical spectra:

- Conservation of rotational energy and enstrophy, more accurate nonlinear energy cascade,

- Conservation of total energy provides stable integrations without excessive dissipation (either explicit or built-in finite-difference schemes) that could affect properties of model generated spectra,

- Hybrid pressure-sigma vertical coordinate system relatively free of errors associated with representation of mountains in the upper troposphere and in the stratosphere where the sigma coordinate errors are largest,

- Explicit formulation of dissipative processes allows precise “dosage” of dissipation.

Page 11: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 11

● Nastrom-Gage (1985, JAS) 1D spectrum in upper troposphere and lower stratosphere from commercial aircraft measurements.

● No spectral gap.

● Transition at few hundred kilometers from –3 slope to –5/3 slope.

● 0.01-0.3 m s-1 in the –5/3 range, high up, not to be confused with severe mesoscale phenomena!

104

108

103

105

102

102 101103

-3

-5/3

Page 12: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 12

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

-6.0 -5.5 -5.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0

isabelnmm3648 k -̂3 k -̂5/3

630 km 63 km

“Isabel”NMM,8 km, 60 lev. -3

-5/3

Page 13: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 13

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

-6.0 -5.5 -5.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0

oceanphy3648 k -̂3 k -̂5/3

Atlantic,NMM-B,15 km, 32 lev.

630 km 63 km

-5/3

-3

Page 14: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 14

No Physics With PhysicsThe Atlantic case, NMM-B, 15 km, 32 Levels

No time (and space) for downscale nonlinear energy cascade, physical or spurious energy source needed on small scales!

Page 15: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 15

Decaying 3D turbulence, Fort Sill storm, 05/20/77.

NMM-B, Ferrier microphysics, 1km, 32 levels,112km by 112km by 16.4km, double periodic.

Spectrum of w2 at 700 hPa, hours 3-4 average.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

-4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0

k -̂5/3 ferrier700180240

-5/3

Page 16: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 16

Eta NMM

Verification

Page 17: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 17

Eta NMM

Mountain waves in the Eta (left) and the NMM (right)

Page 18: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 18

951.72 mbObs. 953 mb

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2003isabel.shtml

“Isabel”

NMM 8 km, 60 lev.

GFS data

Sea levelPressure

Page 19: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 19

NMM 8 km, 60 lev.GFS data3 hourAccumulation

NCAR geometrical progression color code

Page 20: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 20

OTHER PHYS1OTHER PHYS2WRF NMM PHYS1WRF NMM PHYS2

AlaskaOctober 2002Vector windAll verification times

Large scale errors clustering by dynamical cores, implications for ensembles!

● NCEP standard verification package, verification against observations.

Page 21: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 21

OTHER PHYS1OTHER PHYS2WRF NMM PHYS1WRF NMM PHYS2

WestFebruary 2003Vector windAll verification times

Large scale errors clustering by horizontal discretization!

● NCEP standard verification package, verification against observations.

Page 22: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 22

☞ Mesoscale Convective Systems, NSSL-SPC Spring Program 2004

● NMM WRF, 4.5 km, 35 levels, about Central domain, Ferrier microphysics, no parameterized convection, Eta initial and boundary conditions, 00Z, up to 30 hours, available in the morning.

● NMM starting from Eta data needs up to 6 hours to spin up convective systems.

NMM

NCAR,CAPS

Page 23: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 23

24 hour 4.5 km forecast of 1 hour accumulated precipitation valid at00Z April 21, 2004 (better than 12 hour forecasts by operational models).

Verifying 2 km radar reflectivity. Courtesy Jack Kain.

Page 24: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 24

Radar,2 km

NCAR EMC,4 km, 35 lev.,Lin

NCEP NMM,4.5 km, 35 lev.,Ferrier

NSSL/SPC2004 SpringProgram

04/05/28, 00Z ∼ +24 hours

Courtesy:Jack Kain,Steve Weiss

Page 25: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 25

☞ Conclusions

● Promising results of high resolution NWP on meso scales.

● NWP on near-cloud scales successful more frequently and with stronger signal than if only by chance.

● Convective systems direct circulations spun-up by the model, predictable?

● Reemphasized importance of forcing and (micro)physics on meso scales?

● Full potential of mesoscale NWP not yet developed.

Page 26: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 26

Sep 04,2003RMS H500 RMS RH700

W est 6 18 30 42 W est 6 18 30 42Central 12 24 36 48 Central 12 24 36 48

East 6 18 30 42 East 6 18 30 42Alaska 12 24 36 48 Alaska 12 24 36 48

9 w ins NMM 7 w ins NMM6 w ins Eta 5 w ins Eta1 w in Other 4 w ins Other

RMS T850 RMS V250

W est 6 18 30 42 W est 6 18 30 42Central 12 24 36 48 Central 12 24 36 48

East 6 18 30 42 East 6 18 30 42Alaska 12 24 36 48 Alaska 12 24 36 48

11 w ins NMM 9 w ins NMM5 w ins Eta 7 w ins Eta0 w ins Other 0 w in Other

56.25% NMM35.94% Eta7.81% Other

● NCEP standard verification package, verification against observations.

Page 27: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 27

Jan 24,2004, 1 month snapshotRMS H500 RMS RH700

West 6 18 30 42 West 6 18 30 42Central 12 24 36 48 Central 12 24 36 48

East 6 18 30 42 East 6 18 30 42Alaska 12 24 36 48 Alaska 12 24 36 48

12 wins NMM 1 win NMM2 wins Eta 15 wins Eta2 wins Other 0 wins Other

RMS T850 RMS V250

West 6 18 30 42 West 6 18 30 42Central 12 24 36 48 Central 12 24 36 48

East 6 18 30 42 East 6 18 30 42Alaska 12 24 36 48 Alaska 12 24 36 48

5 wins NMM 10 wins NMM9 wins Eta 1 win Eta2 wins Other 5 wins Other

43.75% NMM42.19% Eta14.06% Other

● NCEP standard verification package, verification against observations.

Page 28: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 28

Radar,2 km

NCAR EMC,4 km, 35 lev.,Lin

NCEP NMM,4.5 km, 35 lev.,Ferrier

NSSL/SPC2004 SpringProgram

04/06/01, 00Z ∼ +24 hours

Courtesy:Jack Kain,Steve Weiss

Page 29: ☞  Two Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model dynamical cores:

Zavisa Janjic 50 Years of NWP, June 14-17, 2004 29

Radar,2 km

NCAR EMC,4 km, 35 lev.,Lin

NCEP NMM,4.5 km, 35 lev.,Ferrier

NSSL/SPC2004 SpringProgram

04/04/28, 00Z ∼ +24 hours

Courtesy:Jack Kain,Steve Weiss