risk and return principles of corporate finance brealey and myers sixth edition slides by matthew...
TRANSCRIPT
Risk and Return
Principles of Corporate FinanceBrealey and Myers Sixth Edition
Slides by
Matthew Will Chapter 8
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 2
Topics Covered
Markowitz Portfolio Theory Risk and Return Relationship Testing the CAPM CAPM Alternatives
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 3
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Combining stocks into portfolios can reduce standard deviation below the level obtained from a simple weighted average calculation.
Correlation coefficients make this possible. The various weighted combinations of stocks
that create this standard deviations constitute the set of efficient portfoliosefficient portfolios.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 4
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Price changes vs. Normal distribution
Microsoft - Daily % change 1986-1997
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
# of
Day
s (f
requ
ency
)
Daily % Change
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 5
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Price changes vs. Normal distribution
Microsoft - Daily % change 1986-1997
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
# of
Day
s (f
requ
ency
)
Daily % Change
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 6
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment C
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-50 0 50
%
prob
abili
ty
% return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 7
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Standard Deviation VS. Expected Return
Investment D
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-50 0 50
%
prob
abili
ty
% return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 8
Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Bristol-Myers Squibb
McDonald’s
Standard Deviation
Expected Return (%)
45% McDonald’s
Expected Returns and Standard Deviations vary given different weighted combinations of the stocks.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 9
Efficient Frontier
Standard Deviation
Expected Return (%)
•Each half egg shell represents the possible weighted combinations for two stocks.
•The composite of all stock sets constitutes the efficient frontier.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 10
Efficient Frontier
Standard Deviation
Expected Return (%)
•Lending or Borrowing at the risk free rate (rf) allows us to exist outside the
efficient frontier.
rf
Lending
BorrowingT
S
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 11
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .4
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
ABC Corp 28 60% 15%
Big Corp 42 40% 21%
Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6
Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 28.1
Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 17.4%
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 12
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .4
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
ABC Corp 28 60% 15%
Big Corp 42 40% 21%
Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6
Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 28.1
Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 17.4%
Let’s Add stock New Corp to the portfolio
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 13
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New CorpNew Corp 3030 50%50% 19% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 14
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New Corp 30 50% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
NOTE: Higher return & Lower risk
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 15
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New Corp 30 50% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
NOTE: Higher return & Lower risk
How did we do that?
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 16
Efficient Frontier
Example Correlation Coefficient = .3
Stocks % of Portfolio Avg Return
Portfolio 28.1 50% 17.4%
New Corp 30 50% 19%
NEW Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 31.80
NEW Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 23.43
NEW Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 18.20%
NOTE: Higher return & Lower risk
How did we do that? DIVERSIFICATION
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 17
Efficient Frontier
A
B
Return
Risk (measured as )
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 18
Efficient Frontier
A
B
Return
Risk
AB
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 19
Efficient Frontier
A
BN
Return
Risk
AB
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 20
Efficient Frontier
A
BN
Return
Risk
ABABN
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 21
Efficient Frontier
A
BN
Return
Risk
AB
Goal is to move up and left.
WHY?
ABN
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 22
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
Low Risk
High Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 23
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
Low Risk
High Return
High Risk
High Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 24
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
Low Risk
High Return
High Risk
High Return
Low Risk
Low Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 25
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
Low Risk
High Return
High Risk
High Return
Low Risk
Low Return
High Risk
Low Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 26
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
Low Risk
High Return
High Risk
High Return
Low Risk
Low Return
High Risk
Low Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 27
Efficient Frontier
Return
Risk
A
BNABABN
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 28
Security Market Line
Return
Risk
.
rf
Efficient PortfolioRisk Free
Return =
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 29
Security Market Line
Return
Risk
.
rf
Risk Free
Return =
Market Return = rm
Efficient Portfolio
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 30
Security Market Line
Return
Risk
.
rf
Risk Free
Return =
Market Return = rm
Efficient Portfolio
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 31
Security Market Line
Return
BETA
.
rf
Risk Free
Return =
Market Return = rm
Efficient Portfolio
1.0
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 32
Security Market Line
Return
BETA
rf
Risk Free
Return =
Market Return = rm
1.0
Security Market Line (SML)
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 33
Security Market LineReturn
BETA
rf
1.0
SML
SML Equation = rf + B ( rm - rf )
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 34
Capital Asset Pricing Model
R = rf + B ( rm - rf )
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 35
Testing the CAPM
Avg Risk Premium 1931-65
Portfolio Beta1.0
SML
30
20
10
0
Investors
Market Portfolio
Beta vs. Average Risk Premium
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 36
Testing the CAPM
Avg Risk Premium 1966-91
Portfolio Beta1.0
SML
30
20
10
0
Investors
Market Portfolio
Beta vs. Average Risk Premium
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 37
Testing the CAPM
0
5
10
15
20
25
Average Return (%)
Company size
Smallest Largest
Company Size vs. Average Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 38
Testing the CAPM
0
5
10
15
20
25
Average Return (%)
Book-Market Ratio
Highest Lowest
Book-Market vs. Average ReturnBook-Market vs. Average Return
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 39
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 40
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 41
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Standard
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 42
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Consumption
Standard
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 43
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Consumption
Wealth
Wealth is uncertain
Consumption is uncertain
Standard
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 44
Consumption Betas vs Market Betas
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Wealth = marketportfolio
Market risk makes wealth
uncertain.
Stocks (and other risky assets)
Consumption
Wealth
Wealth is uncertain
Consumption is uncertain
Standard
CAPM
Consumption
CAPM
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 45
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Alternative to CAPMAlternative to CAPM
Expected Risk
Premium = r - rf
= Bfactor1(rfactor1 - rf) + Bf2(rf2 - rf) + …
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 46
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Alternative to CAPMAlternative to CAPM
Expected Risk
Premium = r - rf
= Bfactor1(rfactor1 - rf) + Bf2(rf2 - rf) + …
Return = a + bfactor1(rfactor1) + bf2(rf2) + …
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000Irwin/McGraw Hill
8- 47
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Estimated risk premiums for taking on risk factors
(1978-1990)
6.36Mrket
.83-Inflation
.49GNP Real
.59-rate Exchange
.61-rateInterest
5.10%spread Yield)(r
ium Risk PremEstimatedFactor
factor fr