固定格子間隔での有限温度格子 qcd の研究
DESCRIPTION
固定格子間隔での有限温度格子 QCD の研究. Takashi Umeda (Hiroshima Univ.) for WHOT-QCD Collaboration. JPS meeting, Kwansei-gakuin , Hyogo, 26 Mar. 2012. /13. Quark Gluon Plasma in Lattice QCD. Quark Gluon Plasma will be understood with theoretical models (e.g. hydrodynamic models) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 1
固定格子間隔での有限温度格子固定格子間隔での有限温度格子 QCDQCD の研の研究究
Takashi Umeda (Hiroshima Univ.)Takashi Umeda (Hiroshima Univ.)
for WHOT-QCD Collaborationfor WHOT-QCD Collaboration
JPS meeting, Kwansei-gakuin, Hyogo, 26 Mar. 2012JPS meeting, Kwansei-gakuin, Hyogo, 26 Mar. 2012
/13
JPS spring 2012 2
Quark Gluon Plasma in Lattice QCD
Quark Gluon Plasma will be Quark Gluon Plasma will be
understood with theoretical models understood with theoretical models
(e.g. hydrodynamic models)(e.g. hydrodynamic models)
which require “physical inputs”which require “physical inputs”
Lattice QCD : first principle calculationLattice QCD : first principle calculation
Phase diagram in (T, Phase diagram in (T, μμ, m, mudud, m, mss))
Transition temperatureTransition temperature
Equation of state ( ε/TEquation of state ( ε/T44, p/T, p/T44,...),...)
etc...etc...http://www.gsi.de/fair/experiments/
T. Umeda (Hiroshima) /13
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 3
Choice of quark actions on the lattice
Most (T, μ≠0) studies done with staggerd-type quarksMost (T, μ≠0) studies done with staggerd-type quarks
NNff=2+1, physical quark mass, (μ≠0)=2+1, physical quark mass, (μ≠0)
4th-root trick to remove unphysical “tastes”4th-root trick to remove unphysical “tastes”
non-locality “Validity is not guaranteed”non-locality “Validity is not guaranteed”
It is important to cross-check with It is important to cross-check with
theoretically sound lattice quarks like Wilson-type quarkstheoretically sound lattice quarks like Wilson-type quarks
The objective of WHOT-QCD collaboration is The objective of WHOT-QCD collaboration is
finite T & μ calculations using finite T & μ calculations using Wilson-type quarksWilson-type quarks
/13
Equation of state in 2+1 flavor QCD with improved Wilson quarks Equation of state in 2+1 flavor QCD with improved Wilson quarks by the fixed scale approachby the fixed scale approachT. UmedaT. Umeda et al. (WHOT-QCD Collab.) [arXiv:1202.4719]et al. (WHOT-QCD Collab.) [arXiv:1202.4719]
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 4
Fixed scale approach to study QCD thermodynamics
Temperature Temperature T=1/(NT=1/(Ntta)a) is varied by is varied by NNtt at fixed at fixed aa
AdvantagesAdvantages
- Line of Constant Physics- Line of Constant Physics
- T=0 subtraction for renorm.- T=0 subtraction for renorm. (spectrum study at T=0 )(spectrum study at T=0 )
- Lattice spacing at lower T- Lattice spacing at lower T
- Finite volume effects- Finite volume effects DisadvantagesDisadvantages
- T resolution- T resolution
- High T region - High T region
a : lattice spacinga : lattice spacingNNtt : lattice size in temporal direction : lattice size in temporal direction
/13
LCP’s in fixed NLCP’s in fixed Ntt approach approach (N(Nff=2 Wilson quarks at N=2 Wilson quarks at Ntt=4)=4)
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 5
Fixed scale approach to study QCD thermodynamics
Temperature Temperature T=1/(NT=1/(Ntta)a) is varied by is varied by NNtt at fixed at fixed aa
a : lattice spacinga : lattice spacingNNtt : lattice size in temporal direction : lattice size in temporal direction
/13
lattice spacing at fixed Nlattice spacing at fixed Ntt AdvantagesAdvantages
- Line of Constant Physics- Line of Constant Physics
- T=0 subtraction for renorm.- T=0 subtraction for renorm. (spectrum study at T=0 )(spectrum study at T=0 )
- Lattice spacing at lower T- Lattice spacing at lower T
- Finite volume effects- Finite volume effects DisadvantagesDisadvantages
- T resolution- T resolution
- High T region - High T region
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 6
Fixed scale approach to study QCD thermodynamics
Temperature Temperature T=1/(NT=1/(Ntta)a) is varied by is varied by NNtt at fixed at fixed aa
a : lattice spacinga : lattice spacingNNtt : lattice size in temporal direction : lattice size in temporal direction
/13
spatial volume at fixed Nspatial volume at fixed Ntt AdvantagesAdvantages
- Line of Constant Physics- Line of Constant Physics
- T=0 subtraction for renorm.- T=0 subtraction for renorm. (spectrum study at T=0 )(spectrum study at T=0 )
- Lattice spacing at lower T- Lattice spacing at lower T
- Finite volume effects- Finite volume effects DisadvantagesDisadvantages
- T resolution- T resolution
- High T region - High T region
NNss for V=(4fm) for V=(4fm)33
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 7
Lattice setup
T=0 simulation: on 28T=0 simulation: on 2833 x 56 x 56 by CP-PACS/JLQCDby CP-PACS/JLQCD Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 011502Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 011502
- - RG-improved Iwasaki glue + NP-improved Wilson quarksRG-improved Iwasaki glue + NP-improved Wilson quarks
- β=2.05, κ- β=2.05, κudud=0.1356, κ=0.1356, κss=0.1351=0.1351
- V~(2 fm)- V~(2 fm)33 , a~0.07 fm, , a~0.07 fm,
- configurations available on the - configurations available on the ILDG/JLDGILDG/JLDG
T>0 simulations: on 32T>0 simulations: on 3233 x N x Ntt (N (Ntt=4, 6, ..., 14, 16) lattices=4, 6, ..., 14, 16) lattices
RHMC algorithm, same parameters as T=0 simulationRHMC algorithm, same parameters as T=0 simulation
/13
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 8
Beta-functions from CP-PACS+JLQCD results
fit fit ββ,,κκudud,,κκss as functions of as functions of
/13
Direct fit method Direct fit method
at a LCPat a LCP
LCPLCPscalescale
We estimate a systematic error using We estimate a systematic error using
for scale dependencefor scale dependence
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 9
Beta-functions from CP-PACS/JLQCD results
χχ22/dof=5.3/dof=5.3χχ22/dof=1.6/dof=1.6 χχ22/dof=2.1/dof=2.1
Meson spectrum by CP-PACS/JLQCD Meson spectrum by CP-PACS/JLQCD Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 011502Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 011502. .
fit fit ββ,,κκudud,,κκss as functions of as functions of
3 (β) x 5 (κ3 (β) x 5 (κudud) x 2 (κ) x 2 (κss) = 30 data points) = 30 data points
/13
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 10
Equation of State in Nf=2+1 QCD
T-integrationT-integration
is performed by Akima Splineis performed by Akima Spline interpolation. interpolation.
ε/Tε/T44 is calculated from is calculated from
Large error in whole T regionLarge error in whole T region
A systematic error due to A systematic error due to beta-functionsbeta-functions
SB limitSB limit
/13
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 11
Polyakov loop and Susceptibility
/13
Polyakov loop requiresPolyakov loop requires T dependent renormalizationT dependent renormalization
c(T) : additive normalization constantc(T) : additive normalization constant(self-energy of the (anti-)quark sources)(self-energy of the (anti-)quark sources)
: heavy quark free energy: heavy quark free energy
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 12
Renormalized Polyakov loop and Susceptibility
/13
Cheng et al.’s renormalization Cheng et al.’s renormalization [PRD77(2008)014511][PRD77(2008)014511]
matching of V(r) to Vmatching of V(r) to Vstringstring(r) at r=1.5r(r) at r=1.5r00
NNff=0 case=0 case
( c( cmm is identical at a fixed scale ) is identical at a fixed scale )
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 13
Summary & outlook
Equation of stateEquation of state
More statistics More statistics are needed in the lower temperature region are needed in the lower temperature region
Results at different scales (β=1.90 by CP-PACS/JLQCD)Results at different scales (β=1.90 by CP-PACS/JLQCD)
NNff=2+1 QCD just at the physical point=2+1 QCD just at the physical point
the physical point (pion mass ~ 140MeV) by PACS-CSthe physical point (pion mass ~ 140MeV) by PACS-CS
beta-functions using reweighting methodbeta-functions using reweighting method
Finite densityFinite density
Taylor expansion method to explore EOS at Taylor expansion method to explore EOS at μμ≠≠00
We presented the EOS and renormalized Polyakov loopWe presented the EOS and renormalized Polyakov loop in Nin Nff=2+1 QCD using improve Wilson quarks=2+1 QCD using improve Wilson quarks
/13
JPS spring 2012 T. Umeda (Hiroshima) 14
Renormalized Polyakov loop and Susceptibility
/13
Cheng et al.’s renormalization Cheng et al.’s renormalization [PRD77(2008)014511][PRD77(2008)014511]
matching of V(r) to Vmatching of V(r) to Vstringstring(r) at r=1.5r(r) at r=1.5r00
V(r) = A –α/r + σrV(r) = A –α/r + σr
VVstringstring(r) = c(r) = cdiff diff -π/12r + σr-π/12r + σr
LLrenren = exp(c = exp(cdiffdiff N Ntt/2)<L>/2)<L>
NNff=0 case=0 case