… on the chlorophyll concentration of i typha latifolia i plants, growing in a substrate...
DESCRIPTION
plantas y aguas negrasTRANSCRIPT
-
The effect of heavy metals accumulation on the chlorophyllconcentration of Typha latifolia plants, growing in a substrate
containing sewage sludge compost and watered withmetaliferus water
Thrassyvoulos Manios a,*, Edward I. Stentiford b, Paul A. Millner c
a Department of Agricultural Technology, Technological Education Institute of Crete, Heraklion, 71110 Crete, Greeceb School of Civil Engineering, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
c School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Received 20 April 2002; received in revised form 20 September 2002; accepted 15 December 2002
Abstract
Typha latifolia plants, commonly known as cattails, were grown in a mixture of sewage sludge compost, commercial
compost and perlite. Four groups (A, B, C and D) were irrigated (once every 2 weeks) with a solution containing
different concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, where in the fifth (group M) tap water was used. At the end of the 10
weeks experimental period the mean concentration of Ni, Cu and Zn in the roots and leaves of the plants in the four
groups was significantly larger to that of the plants of group M. A linear regression test satisfactorily correlated the
metals concentrations in the irrigation solutions with the metals concentration in the leaves and roots of groups A, B, C
and D. The concentration of total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a (chla) and chlorophyll b (chlb) in the leaves of the
developing plants was also monitored in 2 weeks intervals. Groups A, B, C and M presented an increasing
concentration of total chlorophyll, with time. In group D (stronger solution), the mean total chlorophyll concentration
was reduced from 1080.69 mg/g fresh weight (f.w.) in the 8th week to 715.14 mg/g f.w., in the 10th week, a probableevidence of inhibition. When statistically tested, it was suggested that there was no significant difference between the
mean chlorophyll values of the groups in each set of samples, concluding that no significant toxic action was imposed in
the plants by the metals. However, when similar statistical analysis was implemented in the ratios of chla and chlb, there
was significant reduction of the ratios in groups D plants, suggesting some increase in chlorophyll hydrolysis due to the
metals accumulation (toxic effect) in comparison with the other groups.
# 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Typha latifolia ; Heavy metals; Sewage sludge compost; Wastewater; Constructed wetlands; Chlorophyll
* Corresponding author. Tel.: /30-810-379-400; fax: /30-810-318-204.E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Manios).
Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/74
www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng
0925-8574/03/$ - see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00004-1
-
1. Introduction
Constructed reed beds or wetlands are claimed
to be low cost, low technology systems able to
treat a variety of wastewaters. In Europe such
systems have been successfully used for treating
domestic sewage for small communities (less than
2000 people equivalent; Green and Upton, 1994;
WRc and Severn Trent Water Plc, 1996; Obarska-Pempokowiak and Klimkowska, 1999). Some-
times such systems are used for the removal of
heavy metals from highways runoff (Mungur et
al., 1995) and acid mine drainage (Mitchel and
Karathanasis, 1995). Metals are removed from
wastewater by plant uptake, chemical precipitation
and ion exchange and adsorption to settled clay
and inorganic compounds (Gearheart, 1992; Mar-tin and Johnson, 1995; Obarska-Pempokowiak
and Klimkowska, 1999). It is likely that the
potential capacity of reed beds to remove metals
by plant uptake and harvesting will be small and
that the ultimate removal of metals from wetland
systems is probably most effectively achieved by
chemical precipitation (Gearheart, 1992; Mungur
et al., 1995; Mitchel and Karathanasis, 1995;Martin and Johnson, 1995; Obarska-Pempoko-
wiak and Klimkowska, 1999).
Under that perspective an effort was made to
improve the substrates performance by using
materials containing large amounts of organic
mater as suggested by a number of researchers
(Gearheart, 1992; Mungur et al., 1995; Mitchel
and Karathanasis, 1995). Sewage sludge compostwas used in experiments conducted in the UK
using Typha latifolia plants and artificial waste-
water (Manios, 2000). The choice of sewage sludge
compost as part of the substrate was based in its
large composition of organic matter and the need
for investigating alternative applications for sew-
age sludge, under the large constrains imposed in
the agricultural use (EU Directive 86/278/EEC).The results indicated that the use of such material
could improve substantially the ability of a sub-
strate to retain heavy metals from wastewater
(Manios, 2000).
However, the use of sewage sludge compost with
large heavy metals concentration could result in an
increase in the metals accumulation in the plants
roots and leaves. Such a phenomenon may have aneffect in the plants development and health. Heavy
metals accumulation in the tissue of different
plants resulted in a decrease of the biomass and
the chlorophyll concentration in the leaves/stems
(Burzynski and Buczek, 1989; Ouzounidou et al.,
1992; Sharma and Gaur, 1995; Abdel-Basset et al.,
1995).
The main aim of this research was to study theeffect of heavy metals accumulation in the devel-
opment of T. latifolia plants growing in sewage
sludge compost containing substrate and watered
with artificial wastewater, by monitoring the
concentration of chlorophyll in their leaves during
a short period experiment. This would allow to
make a primary assumption of the combined effect
in the plants growth and health of the heavymetals existing in both the compost and the
wastewater.
2. Materials and methods
The sewage sludge compost was produced by
Thames Water Plc using a windrow system with
sewage sludge and straw on a 1:1 basis by volume
(v/v). The chemical characteristics of the sewage
sludge and the produced compost are shown inTable 1. The final material used in the pots was a
mixture of this compost with commercial peat
Table 1
Typical characteristics of the sewage sludge and the produced
compost (supplied by Thames Water Plc)
Parameters Sewage sludge Compost
Dry matter (% ww) 25.2 31
Volatile solids (% dw) 66.4 65
pH 6.7 7.9
Total-P (% dw) 2.3 2.6
Cu (mg/kg dw) 599 525
Zn (mg/kg dw) 728 825
Ni (mg/kg dw) 99 68
Cd (mg/kg dw) 1.2 1.5
Pb (mg/kg dw) 191 189
Cr (mg/kg dw) 134 118
Hg (mg/kg dw) 2.5 2.6
As (mg/kg dw) 2.5 1.9
Se (mg/kg dw) 2.0 1.9
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/7466
-
based compost 25% v/v and perlite 25% v/v. The
use of peat and perlite was considered as necessary
in order to avoid any phytotoxic phenomena from
the compost. It is well established that mixtures
containing more than 50% v/v mature compost of
any origin can produce some kind of phytotoxicity
(Manios et al., 1989). The pH of the mixture was
7.1 and the concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and
Zn were 5.79/1.1, 5679/34.71, 479/6.82, 1309/12and 7459/21.50 mg/kg dw, respectively, (9/stan-dard deviation from analysing three samples).
A large number of small and healthy T. latifolia
plants (originally gathered from a local lagoon)
were left in the substrate for 6 weeks to adjust to
their new environment. At the end of that period
30 of them were selected for the experiment. The
plants and pots were separated into five groups
with six replicas (pots) in each. The selection was
based in the height and the number of leaves of
each plant in order to achieve a uniformity among
groups. Groups A, B, C and D were the groups,
which would be watered with the heavy metals
solution, and Group M which would be used as
blank and watered with tap water.
Table 2 shows the concentrations of metals used
for the different groups, ordinary tap water was
used to make up the solutions. These concentra-
tions are multiples of those found in domestic
wastewater and considerable higher than those
found in other types of wastewater, as for example,
acid mine drainage (Mitchel and Karathanasis,
1995). Such high concentrations would be suffi-
cient to create a substantial effect in the plants
development in the considerable short experimen-
tal period (Cheng et al., 2002).
PVC pots were used with an average diameter of
200 mm and a height of 200 mm, with a usable
volume of 5.0 l. The trays were large enough to
retain any drainage water enabling it to be
reabsorbed by the soil in the pot. Each pot of
each group was given 1 l of the groups solution
every 2 weeks. The solution was added slowly to
the surface of the soil taking care not to spill any
on the leaves or outside the pot. In total five
waterings (week 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8) with the heavy
metal solutions took place over a period of 10
weeks and six sets of leaves tissue samples
(sampling in week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10) for each
group were gathered. Each set was combined by a
sample from each plant of each group (total of 30
samples per set). The samples were collected from
leaves of similar age and development, about 1/2cm2 and wrapped into marked aluminium foil.
They were then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and
either stored at /20 8C, or analysed directly.Total chlorophyll concentration is a unifying
parameter for indicating the effect of specific
interventions. However, it is important to record
changes in the two components of chlorophyll,
chlorophyll a (chla) and chlorophyll b (chlb) and
especially their ratio. This is due to the fact that
heavy metals could affect each component at a
different level creating changes in some part of
plants physiology and not in others. Concentra-
tions of chla and chlb and total chlorophyll (total
Table 2
Concentration of heavy metals in each experimental groups solution and the solutions pH
Cd (mg/l)
[Cd(NO3)24H2O]
Cu (mg/l)
[Cu(NO3)25H2O]
Ni (mg/l)
[Ni(NO3)26H2O]
Pb (mg/l)
[Pb(NO3)2]
Zn (mg/l)
[Zn(NO3)26H2O]
pH
Group
M
/ / / / / 7.53
Group
A
0.5 10 5 5 10 6.55
Group
B
1 20 10 10 20 6.32
Group
C
2 40 20 20 40 6.30
Group
D
4 80 40 40 80 6.15
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/74 67
-
chl/chla/chlb), were calculated using the meth-odology developed by Arnon (1949).
At the end of the tenth week the plants were
carefully uprooted, washed thoroughly with water
and soap and rinsed twice with distilled water in
order to remove any soil particles from the
substrate. Such particle could effect considerable
the measured metals concentration, due to the
presence of sewage sludge in the substrate. Afterwashing, the roots and leaves were separated and
put in weighed paper bags and dried (80 8C for 72h). One gram of the leaves tissue (six replicas per
group), were put in special digestion tubes (Buchi
430 Digestor). Concentrated (97%) nitric acid was
put in the tubes and the tubes were retained for 24
h at room temperature. After this initial digestion
the samples were digested for 4 h at a range oftemperatures. For the first hour the temperature
was 100 8C, for the second hour 150 8C andfinally 200 8C for 2 h (Sposito et al., 1983). Theremaining liquid, which most times was about one
quarter of the original acid dilution, was filtered
using Whatman GF/C paper filters. De-ionised
water was added until the new solution reached the
volume of the acid originally used (25 ml). Thesamples were then analysed using an atomic
absorption spectrophotometer (A.A.S., Spectra
AA-10).
In order to evaluate statistically any significant
differences among mean values, a single factor
ANOVA test was used. In all tests the significance
level at which we evaluated critical values differ-
ences was 5%. Linear regression was used forevaluating the effect of metals concentration in the
watering solutions in the mean metals concentra-
tion in the plants biomass.
3. Results and discussion
As the experiment progressed, the amount of
metals present in each pot increased in all groups,with the exemption of the blank, for which
remained the same and equal to the original
amount of metals existing in the substrate. Re-
spectively, and according to Tables 3 and 4, the
mean concentration of Cu, Ni and Zn in the roots
and leaves of the plants, at the end of the
experiment, was larger in groups A, B, C and D
compared with group M. This difference was
significant (5% level) according to a single factor
ANOVA test, in both roots and leaves/stems of the
plants, among all five groups. Since the use of
different solutions for the irrigation of the plants
was the only notable difference among the groups,
is safe to suggest that the differentiation in the
concentration of metals in the plants biomass
should be correlated with the watering pattern.
In order to support this theory a linear regres-
sion test was used to correlate the concentration of
each metal in the irrigation solutions with the
relevant concentration in the roots and leaves/
stems, through the groups. The results indicated
that there was a strong linear relationship among
these variables, with the minimum r2 value higher
than 0.7 (Table 5). Based in these two statistical
Table 3
Mean metals concentration (mg/kg d.w.) in the roots of the
plants of each group at the end of the experiment
Group Cu Ni Zn
M 40.009/14.14a 30.009/8.16a 293.339/28.09a
A 46.679/12.47b 38.339/12.13ab 300.009/20.00a
B 45.009/9.58b 45.009/15.00b 330.009/21.60b
C 60.009/10.00c 51.679/10.67b 361.679/36.25bc
D 93.339/12.47d 55.009/9.57b 391.679/19.51c
Six replicate per group, (9/) S.D. The mean values followedby different superscripts within each column indicate that they
were significantly different at a probability level of 0.05
according to ANOVA test.
Table 4
Mean Cu, Ni and Zn concentration (mg/kg d.w.) in the leaves
of the plants of each group at the end of the experiment
Group Cu Ni Zn
M 9.179/3.44a 17.509/6.92a 34.189/15.38a
A 10.839/4.48ab 21.679/8.98ab 48.339/12.14ab
B 10.839/5.34ab 25.009/9.58ab 58.339/10.68b
C 14.179/4.48b 27.679/4.53b 55.839/8.38b
D 15.009/7.64b 27.509/3.82b 60.839/13.04b
Six replicate per group, (9/) S.D. The mean values followedby different superscripts within each column indicate that they
were significantly different at a probability level of 0.05
according to ANOVA test.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/7468
-
tests is safe to suggest that the metals accumulated
in the roots-leaves origin mostly from the artificial
wastewater for three reasons: (a) the metals in the
wastewater were in the easily absorbable by the
plants form of diluted inorganic salts, (b) the
majority of the metals in the compost were
retained by the colloids delaying their release inthe water solution, and (c) the short duration of
the experiment did not allow the plants adequate
time in order to absorb metals from the substrate.
The concentrations of metals in the roots and
leaves, as presented in Tables 3 and 4, are some of
the larger recorded in literature for cattail plants
(Mungur et al., 1995; Ye et al., 1997a).
According to Burzynski and Buczek (1989),Sharma and Gaur (1995), Salt et al. (1995),
Abdel-Basset et al. (1995), Rai et al. (1995) and
Ewais (1997), there is a threshold of tolerance in
each plant to the heavy metals accumulation. For
a number of environmentally, physiologically and
genetically determined reasons this threshold is
different among plants species. When this limit is
crossed then the toxic effect of the metals in theplants, takes its toll.
If the amount of metals accumulated in the
tissue of the leaves/stems had crossed the tolerance
threshold of the T. latifolia plants in groups A, B,
C and D, then there should have been some
decrease of the total chlorophyll concentration
(Gadallah, 1994; Sharma and Gaur, 1995). Figs.
1/3 suggest that in groups A, B, C and M, thechlorophyll concentration increases with time. In
Fig. 2 and for group D the mean chlorophyll
concentration from 1080.69 mg/g fresh weight(f.w.) in the eighth week, dropped in 715.14 mg/gf.w. 2 weeks and a watering later. This could be an
indication of some inhibition of growth. However,
when a single factor ANOVA test (5% significance
level) was used, suggested that there was no
significant difference among the mean values of
the five groups, in all six set of samples. This can
be interpreted as a failure of the accumulated
metals to effect the chlorophyll concentration, in
the leaves.
According to Gadallah (1994), Drazkiewicz(1994), Abdel-Basset et al. (1995), Sharma and
Gaur (1995) and Ewais (1997), changes in the
concentration of chl a and b and particularly
changes in their ratio are an equal important
parameter, which should always been taken under
consideration when estimating the effect of an
environmental parameter (as irrigation with meta-
liferous wastewater) in plants. Ewais (1997) usedCyperus difformis L., Chenopodium ambrosiodes L.
and Digitaria sanguinolis L., Sharma and Gaur
(1995) used Lemna polyrrhiza (duckweed) and
Abdel-Basset et al. (1995) used two algae species
(Chlorella fusca and Kirchneriella lunaris ) to
evaluate the effect of heavy metals in total
chlorophyll concentration. All three agreed that
heavy metals accumulation, responsible for thereduction of total chlorophyll concentration, had a
similar negative effect in the ratio of chla to chlb.
This occurs due to a faster hydrolysis ratio of chla
compared with chl b when plants are under stress
(Schoch and Brown, 1987; Drazkiewicz, 1994;
Abdel-Basset et al., 1995).
Table 6 presents the mean ratios of chla to chlb
in all five groups for all six set of samples. A singlefactor ANOVA test was used in order to evaluate
the significance (5% level) of the different between
the ratios. For the first five sets of samples
(columns-week 0/week 8) in Table 6, there wasno significance difference indicating no signifi-
cance effect of the metals in the plant. For the
sixth set (week 10) there was a significant differ-
Table 5
The r2 values of the linear regression correlation between the concentration of Cu, Ni and Zn in the irrigation solutions and their mean
concentration in the leaves and roots of groups A/D
Concentration of metals in the solutions
Cu Ni Zn
Mean concentration of metals in the roots 0.813 0.979 0.998
Mean concentration of metals in the leaves 0.869 0.860 0.700
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/74 69
-
ence, which should be considered as an evidence of
some effect of continues waterings in the plants.
However, this can not indicate which solution (A/D) or water (M) was responsible.
As presented in Table 6, there is no significance
difference in the ratio for groups A/C and M,between the consecutive waterings (rows-week 0/week 10) suggesting no effect of the irrigation
solution and water, their chlorophyll production
and health. On the contrary in group D, there is a
significant difference (ANOVA) in the ratios of
chla and chlb, among the six sets of samples,
suggesting a significant effect of the five waterings
with the stronger solution (Table 2) in the plants,
health and development.These results are in agreement with relevant
research by Burzynski and Buczek (1989), Sharma
and Gaur (1995), Abdel-Basset et al. (1995), Salt et
al. (1995), Rai et al. (1995), Ewais (1997) and
Manios et al., (2002), suggesting that for the plants
used in this experiment (T. latifolia ) and under the
conditions of growth (sewage sludge in the sub-
strate, metals solution for irrigation) the metals
accumulation became toxic only in group D and
only after the last watering. In all other groups
plants did not present any toxic symptom which
Fig. 1. Changes in the concentration of total chlorophyll (j), chla ( ) and chlb (I) in the plants of groups A and B.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/7470
-
could be correlated with the metals accumulation
in the plants biomass. On the contrary the
chlorophyll concentration was increasing with
time phenomenon, which can be explained
through the following assumptions:The tolerance threshold of the T. latifolia plants
was not reached in those groups, during the
experimental period. Mitchel and Karathanasis
(1995) and Ye et al. (1997a) in relevant experi-
ments with T. latifolia plants indicated the in-
creased tolerance of the plant in both the presence
and the accumulation of heavy metals. None of the
authors determined a specific threshold since that
would be affected by the age and development
stage of the plant, the concentration of metals in
substrate and solution, the different metals in the
solution and their independent concentration, the
pH of the solution and the environmental condi-
tions. It is safe, though, to suggest, based on
literature and the above presented results, that for
the plants in Groups A, B, C and M, this threshold
was not reached.
The concentration of metals in the solutions was
not very large, providing the plants with an
amount of metals which would accelerate their
growth instead of inhibiting it. Most of the metals
used in the solution are necessary, in some small
amounts, for plants development (Streit and
Fig. 2. Changes in the concentration of total chlorophyll (j), chla ( ) and chlb (I) in the plants of groups C and D.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/74 71
-
Stumm, 1993; Salt et al., 1995). The concentration
of the metals in Groups A, B and especially C
could not be considered as small. It could be
suggested that in the beginning of the experiment
the metals offered in the plants did help them to
develop better by covering their needs in easily
absorbed micronutrients. As time progressed, the
amount of metals added in each pot exceeded by
much the necessary amount of metals for the
development of the plants. As so, this parameter
should not be regarded as substantial.
The tolerance threshold was pushed upwards
due to the existence of a growth acceleration factor
in the solution. Wong et al. (1997) irrigated
Aegiceras corniculatum with wastewater of differ-
ent strength, containing heavy metals. The plants
watered with the lower concentration wastewater
produced higher yield than the blank and any
other group. The authors explain this positive
effect due to the nutrients existing in the waste-
water. The plants supported by the easily absorbed
micro and macronutrients were able to overcome
the toxic effect produced by the low heavy metals
concentration. However, when the amount of
metals became larger, then the yield was decreased
as the plant could not overcome the metals
toxicity. In this specific experiment the toxic
threshold of the heavy metals for Aegiceras
Fig. 3. Changes in the concentration of total chlorophyll (j), chla ( ) and chlb (I) in the plants of group M.
Table 6
The mean ratios of chla to chlb concentration in all five groups for all six sets of samples
Group
M A B C D
Week 0 2.8679/0.014a* 2.8659/0.029a* 2.8789/0.007a* 2.8679/0.040a* 2.8909/0.017a*
Week 2 2.8179/0.097a* 2.8689/0.014a* 2.8629/0.012a* 2.8559/0.082a* 2.8749/0.010a*
Week 4 2.8779/0.09a* 2.8889/0.014a* 2.8339/0.045a* 2.8709/0.008a* 2.8099/0.132ab*
Week 6 2.7369/0.232ab* 2.8459/0.014a* 2.8079/0.038a* 2.8239/0.024a* 2.8369/0.025a*
Week 8 2.6179/0.174b* 2.7909/0.009ab 2.7209/0.306a* 2.8329/0.079a 2.7809/0.062b
Week 10 2.7679/0.067ab* 2.7629/0.055b* 2.7299/0.116a* 2.8479/0.032a 2.5819/0.150c$
Six replicate per group, (9/) S.D. The mean values followed by different superscripts letters within each column indicate that theywere significantly different at a probability level of 0.05 according to ANOVA test. The mean values followed by different superscripts
symbols within each row indicate that they were significantly different at a probability level of 0.05 according to ANOVA test.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/7472
-
corniculatum, was pushed upwards by the exis-tence of the nutrients (growth factor). The same
effect has been recorded by Sharma and Gaur
(1995) when working with Lemma polyrrhiza
(duckweed) plants and Gadallah (1994) when
working with Phaseolous vulgaris (bush bean).
In this experiment the growth factor offered to
the plants was the NO3 diluted in the artificial
wastewater through the metals containing saltsused for the solutions production. In Groups A/C the toxicity of the metals absorbed by the plants
was overruled by the accelerated growth of the
plants due to the nitrogen availability. In Group D
the concentration of the metals became so large,
that the increased presence of nitrogen could not
any more balance the toxicity, and chlorophyll
production after the fifth consecutive watering waseffected. Similar results were presented by Ouzou-
nidou et al. (1992), Ye et al. (1997a,b), Ewais
(1997) and Wong et al. (1997).
4. Conclusions
The sewage sludge compost used as a substrate
component in this experiment was highly contami-nated with heavy metals which however did not
impose any significant effect in the development
and growth of the cattails (T. latifolia ) plants.
There was a significant increase in the metals
concentration in the plants tissue (roots and
leaves), which was sufficiently correlated with the
metals in the watering solutions and not with the
metals in the substrate. There was some inhibitionin the plants growth (noticed through a reduction
in chla to chlb ratio) recorded in the plants
irrigated with the stronger of the watering solu-
tions. In the same plants the larger heavy metals
concentrations were also recorded. This toxicity
was significantly correlated with the watering
pattern and not the substrate. In conclusion it is
safe to suggest that there were no evidence ofincompatibility in the use of sewage sludge and T.
latifolia plants in wetlands treating metaliferus
wastewater. Additionally monitoring total chl
concentration and chla to chlb ratio can be used
as an early warning systems for the toxic effect of
metals accumulation in plants.
References
Abdel-Basset, R., Issa, A.A., Adam, M.S., 1995. Chlorophyl-
lase activity: effect of heavy metals and calcium. Photo-
synthetica 31, 421/425.Arnon, D.I., 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts,
polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24, 1/15.Burzynski, M., Buczek, J., 1989. Interaction between cadmium
and molybdenum affecting the chlorophyll content and
accumulation of some heavy metals in the second leaf of
Cucumis sativus L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 11, 137/145.Cheng, S., Grosse, W., Karrenbrock, F., Thoennessen, M.,
2002. Efficiency of constructed wetlands in decontamination
of water polluted by heavy metals. Ecol. Eng. 18, 317/325.Drazkiewicz, M., 1994. Chlorophyllase: occurrence, functions,
mechanisms of action, effects of external and internal
factors. Phytosynthetica 30, 321/331.Ewais, E.A., 1997. Effects of cadmium, nickel and lead on
growth, chlorophyll content and proteins of weeds. Biol.
Plant. 39, 403/410.Gadallah, M.A.A., 1994. Interactive effect of heavy metals and
temperature on the growth and chlorophyll, saccharides and
soluble nitrogen contents in Phaseolous vulgaris . Biol. Plant.
36, 373/382.Gearheart, R.A., 1992. Use of constructed wetlands to treat
domestic wastewater, city of Arcata, California. Water Sci.
Technol. 26, 1625/1637.Green, M.B., Upton, J., 1994. Constructed reed beds: a cost-
effective way to polish wastewater effluents for small
communities. Water Environ. Res. 66, 188/192.Manios, T., 2000. The use of sewage sludge compost and Typha
latifolia plants to treat wastewater. Ph.D. thesis, School of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and School of Civil
Engineering, University of Leeds.
Manios, V.I., Tsikalas, P.E., Syminis, C.I., 1989. Phytotoxicity
of olive tree leaf compost in relation to the organic acid
concentration. Biol. Wastes 27, 307/317.Manios, T., Millner, P.A., Stentiford, E.I., 2002. The effect of
heavy metals on the total protein concentration of Typha
latifolia plants, growing in a substarte containing sewage
sludge compost and watered with metaliferus wastewater. J.
Env. Sci. Health A37 (8), 925/936.Martin, C.D., Johnson, K.D., 1995. The use of extended
aeration and in-series surface flow wetlands for landfill
leachate treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 32, 119/128.Mitchel, L.K., Karathanasis, A.D., 1995. Treatment of metal/
chloride-enriched wastewater by simulated constructed wet-
lands. Environ. Geochem. Health 17, 119/126.Mungur, A.S., Shutes, B.E., Revitt, D.M., House, M.A., 1995.
An assessment of metal from highway runoff by natural
wetland. Water Sci Technol. 32, 169/175.Obarska-Pempokowiak, H., Klimkowska, K., 1999. Distribu-
tion of nutrients and heavy metals in a constructed wetland
system. Chemosphere 39, 303/312.Ouzounidou, G., Eleftheriou, E.P., Karataglis, S., 1992.
Ecophysical and ultrastructural effects of copper in Thlaspi
ochroleucum (Cruciferae). Can. J. Bot. 70, 947/957.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/74 73
-
Rai, U.N., Sinha, S., Tripathi, R.D., Chandra, T.P., 1995.
Wastewater treatability potential of some aquatic macro-
phytes: removal of heavy metals. Ecol. Eng. 5, 5/12.Salt, D.E., Blaylock, M.B., Kumar, N.P.B.A., Dushenkov, V.,
Ensley, B.D., Chet, I., Raskin, I., 1995. Phytoremediation: a
novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the
environment using plants. BioTechnology 13, 468/474.Schoch, S., Brown, J., 1987. The action of chlorophyllase on
chlorophyll/protein complexes. J. Plant Physiol. 129, 242/249.
WRc and Severn Trent Water Plc., 1996. Reed beds and
constructed wetlands for waste water treatment, WRc,
Swindon, UK.
Sharma, S.S., Gaur, J.P., 1995. Potential of Lemna polyrrhiza
for removal of heavy metals. Ecol. Eng. 4, 37/43.Sposito, G., LeVesque, C.S., LeClaire, J.P., Chang, A.C., 1983.
Trace metal chemistry in arid-zone field soils amended with
sewage sludge: III. Effect of time on the extraction of trace
metals. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 898/902.Streit, B., Stumm, W., 1993. Chemical properties of metals. In:
Markert, B. (Ed.), Plants as Biomonitors. VCH, New York,
USA.
Wong, Y.S., Tam, N.F.Y., Chen, G.Z., Ma, H., 1997. Response
of Aegiceras corniculatum to synthetic sewage under simu-
lated tidal conditions. Hydrobiologia 352, 89/96.Ye, Z.H., Cheung, K.C., Wong, M.H., 1997a. Copper uptake in
Typha latifolia plants as affected by iron and manganese
plaque in the root surface. Can. J. Bot. 80, 363/370.Ye, Z.H., Baker, A.J.M., Wong, M.H., Willis, A.J., 1997b.
Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance, uptake and accumula-
tion by common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex
Steudel . Ann. Bot. 80, 363/370.
T. Manios et al. / Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 65/7474
The effect of heavy metals accumulation on the chlorophyll concentration of Typha latifolia plants, growing in a substrate contIntroductionMaterials and methodsResults and discussionConclusionsReferences