© mcgraw hill companies, inc., 2000 accounting in the international business chapter 19

19
© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Accounting in the International Business Chapter 19

Post on 21-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Accounting in the International Business

Chapter 19

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Accounting Information and Capital Flows

Business Enterprise

Providers of Capital (investors, Creditors

and Government)

Resource Users

Resource Providers

Information Providers

Information Users

Financial Accounting Information

$

Figure 19.1

19-1

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Determinants of National Accounting Standards

National Accounti

ng System

Political and Economic Ties

with Other Countries

Level of Economic

DevelopmentNational Culture

Level of Inflation

Relationship Between

Business and Providers of Capital

Figure 19.219-2

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Relationship Between Business and Providers of Capital

External sources of capital: Individual investors.

• Buying shares and bonds.

Banks.• Loan capital.

Government.• Make loans or investment.

Importance of each varies from country to country

19-3

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Political and Economic Ties with Other Countries

Accounting convergence: Influence of NAFTA. Influence of the former

British Empire. Influence of the European

Union.

19-4

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Inflation Accounting Historic cost principle:

Assumes currency is not losing value to inflation. Most significant impact = asset valuation. Appropriateness varies with inflation.

Current cost accounting: Factors out inflation. Used in Great Britain until

inflation rate declined.

19-5

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Level of Development

Developed countries have more sophisticated accounting procedures. Accounting problems are more complex. Sophisticated capital markets. Lenders require comprehensive reports. Educated workforce can perform complex

accounting functions.

19-6

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Culture

Hofstede’s uncertainty avoidance has an impact on accounting systems. Low uncertainty avoidance - these countries

tend to have strong independent accounting professions that ensure a firm’s compliance with rules.

19-7

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Accounting Clusters

British-American-Dutch Group

Firms raise capital from investors. Accounting

systems designed to inform investors

Europe-Japan Group

Have close ties to banks. Accounting practices meet

bank’s needs.South American

GroupCountries have experienced persistent and rapid inflation. Accounting principles reflect

the inflation.

19-8

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 19-9Map 19.1

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

International Accounting Standards Committee

Members represent 79 countries. Responsible for formulating international

accounting standards (IAS). Has issued over 30 IAS.

Difficult to get requisite votes. Voluntary compliance.

Recognition is growing.

19-10

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Multinational Consolidation and Currency Translation

Consolidated Financial Statements Parent Foreign

SubsidiaryCash $1,000 $250Receivables 3,000 900 Payables 300 500Revenues 3,000 900

Expenses 2,000 3,000

*Subsidiary owes Parent $300*Subsidiary pays Parent $1000 in royalties for products licensed from Parent

EliminationsParent Foreign Subsidiary Debit Credit ConsolidatedCash $1,000 $250

$1,250Receivables 3,000 900 $300 3,600 Payables 300 500* $300 500Revenues 7,000 5,000 1,000

11,000Expenses 2,000 3,000** 1,000 4,000

*Subsidiary owes Parent $300.**Subsidiary pays Parent $1,000 in royalties for products licensed from Parent.

19-11

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Currency Translation The current rate method: the exchange rate at

the balance sheet’s date is used to translate foreign subsidiary financial statements into home country currency. Incompatible with ‘historic cost principle’.

The temporal method: translates foreign subsidiary assets into home-country currency at the time the asset is purchased. Changing exchange rates may mean the balance sheet

may not balance!

19-12

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

U.S. Practice Statement 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” Self-sustaining autonomous subsidiary:

Functional currency is local currency. Balance sheet uses exchange rate at end

of financial year. Income statement is financial year average.

Integral subsidiary: Functional currency is US currency. Financial statements use the temporal

method. Dangling credit or debit increases or

decreases consolidated earnings for the period.

Firms using multidomestic or international strategies.

Firms using global or transnational strategies.

19-13

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Accounting Aspects of Control Systems

Annual control process involves three steps: Head office and suibunit management jointly

determine subunit goals for the coming year. Throughout year, head office monitors subunit

performance against agreed goals. If subunit fails to achieve goals, head office

intervenes to determine why the shortfall occurred, taking corrective action when appropriate.

19-14

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Importance of Financial Criteria Used to Evaluate Performance of Foreign Subsidiaries

and Their ManagersItem Subsidiary Manager

Return on investment (ROI) 1.9 2.2

Return on equity (ROE) 3.0 3.0Return on assets (ROA) 2.3 2.3Return on sales (ROS) 2.1 2.1Residual income 3.4 3.3Budget compared to actuaL sales 1.9 1.7Budget compared to actual profit 1.5 1.3Budget compared to actuaL ROI 2.3 2.4Budget compared to actual ROA 2.7 2.5Budget compared to actuaL ROE 3.1 3.0

Importance of criteria ranked on a scale from 1=very important to 5=unimportant. Table 19.1

19-15

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Exchange Rate Changes and Control Systems

Lessard-Lorange Model: Three exchange rates used to translate foreign

currency into corporate currency for budget and performance purposes.

• The initial rate, the spot exchange rate when the budget is adopted.

• The projected rate,the spot exchange forecast for the end of budget period (I.e., the forward rate)

• The ending rate, the spot exchange rate when the budget and performance are being compared.

19-16

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Possible Combinations of Exchange Rates in the Control Process

Rates Used to Translate Actual Performance for Comparison with Budget

Rates Used

for Translating

Budget

(II) Budget at

Initial Actual at Initial

Budget at Initial Actual at Projected

(IE) Budget at

Initial Actual at Ending Budget at

Projected Actual at Initial

(PP) Budget at Projected Actual at Projected

(PE) Budget at Projected Actual at

Ending Budget at Ending Actual at

Initial

Budget at Ending Actual at

Projected

(EE) Budget at

Ending Actual at Ending

Initial (I) Projected (P) Ending (E)

Initial (I)

Projected (P)

Ending (E)

Figure 19.3

19-17

© McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000

Transfer Pricing and Control Systems

Before Change in Transfer Price

After 20% Increase in Transfer Price

Revenues per unit $230 $230

Cost of component per unit 100 100

Revenues per unit 100 100

Profit per unit 30 10

19-18