休閒農場經營模式和體驗行銷策略之探討...

20
211 休閒農場經營模式和體驗行銷策略之探討 休閒農場經營模式和體驗行銷策略之探討 休閒農場經營模式和體驗行銷策略之探討 休閒農場經營模式和體驗行銷策略之探討 -以宜蘭縣為例 以宜蘭縣為例 以宜蘭縣為例 以宜蘭縣為例 蕭靜雅 蕭靜雅 蕭靜雅 蕭靜雅 1 柯文華 柯文華 柯文華 柯文華 2 蕭雅美 蕭雅美 蕭雅美 蕭雅美 3 北台灣科技學院講師 1 輔仁大學助理教授 2 美和技術學院講師 3 摘要 摘要 摘要 摘要 休閒農場是政府為了舒緩農業內在的困境及外來衝擊而積極輔導休閒農業發 展中的重要一環,主要帶動農村地區之繁榮與商機。宜蘭縣的休閒農場就在政府的 輔導政策發展的相當迅速。本文選定當地二家休閒農場探討其經營模式和體驗行 銷。研究結果,這二家休閒農場經營模式的共同點是在體驗行銷中展現各自的獨特 性,雖然經濟規模不大,但涵蓋了初級產品、製造商品、提供服務和展示體驗等四 個層級的產業產品,這充分表現出體驗型休閒農場的一個產品特性。這二家休閒農 場走的是平價路線,其遊客數在假日與平常日之間的落差頗大,而低廉的消費價格 亦無法反應其成本,此一問題也在本文中探討其原委。因此,本研究考慮實際狀況 和產品特質,從經營模式及體驗行銷論點著手,以探索性的質化研究方法,針對休 閒農場進行調查分析,探究其休閒農業資源、經營模式、體驗活動及體驗行銷策略 之現況及問題,研擬具體之經營行銷的策略和建議,提出二家休閒農場可行性之體 驗行銷策略。最後藉著SWOT優劣勢分析之後,提出政府相關部門對輔導休閒農場 的參考事項,和業者的經營模式及行銷策略之建議。 關鍵字 關鍵字 關鍵字 關鍵字:休閒農場 休閒農場 休閒農場 休閒農場、經營模式 經營模式 經營模式 經營模式、體驗行銷 體驗行銷 體驗行銷 體驗行銷

Upload: truongkhue

Post on 26-Feb-2019

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

31 97 3

211

-

1

2 3

1 2 3

SWOT

-

212

A Study on the Administration and Marketing Strategy in Leisure FarmingThe Case of I-Lan

County

Hsiao,Ching-Ya1 Ko,Wen-Hwa

2 Hsiao,Ya-Mei

3

Technology and Science Institute of Northern Taiwan1

Fu Jen Cathlic University2

Meiho Institute of Technology 3

Abstract The leisure farm industry is a ring that the government coaches the development of

recreation agriculture in order to relieve agriculture's inherent predicament and outside

competition. The leisure farm industry of I-Lan County grows up fast under the

government's coaching policy. This article selected two leisure farms and probe into their

types of operation and experience marketing. The result of study shows the common

points of these types of operation of two leisure farms represent their own uniqueness.

Although not big enough, yet it contains primary products, producing goods, provide

service and show four level of industry products while this fully demonstrates a product

performance of the experiencing type recreation farm. It is par route that these two

leisure farms are taken, the number of visitors drops lots between vacation and casual

days and the cheap consumption price is also unable to react real cost. This questionnaire

also probes the reasons. In such case, this research considers the real state and products

specialty, set from the business model and argument of the experiential marketing. The

approach of this study was to probe into the current situation of leisure farms and analyze

to the leisure farm, probe into the present situation and question of its recreation

agricultural resource, business model, experience activity, experiential marketing. And

suggestion to the two leisure farms proposing a workable experiential marketing strategy.

At last, through the use of SWOT, we propose the reference items to coach the leisure

farm industry for the governmental relevant departments and some suggestions about

business model and marketing strategy for the managers of the leisure farm industry.

Key word: Leisure farmBusiness ModelExperiential marketing

31 97 3

213

1

(2000) ;

113

444823%

402002

-

214

1.

2.

3.

4.

leisure agriculture

( leisure farming )

-1

1991 1995 1996 1996 2000

31 97 3

215

2000 2001

1.(1965~1980

)2.(1980~1986)

3.(1986~1989)4.

(1989~1999)5.(2000

)

1996

1.

2.

3.

4.

-

216

1 (1997)

1. 2.

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

16.

() /

()

()

2 2 2 2

31 97 3

217

1998Gilmore and Pine,(experience economy)

1999

2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 Gilmore and Pine2003

-

218

20005

Verduin McEwen1984

1.(social benefits). 2.(relaxation benefits). 3.

(educational benefits) 4.(psychological benefits) 5. (aesthetic

benefits)Schmitt( 1 999)

::1991

19961.2.3.

4.5.

4

31 97 3

219

SWOT

1.

2.

3.

4.

5. SWOTSWOTStrengths

WeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats

SWOT

6.

-

220

3

5 5 5 5

149-41

03-92322090935-187839

1. 2. 3.

2. 8

3. 6.

4.

5.

1. ~~ 2. ()

2. ~~ ()

3. ~ DIY ()

4. ~ ( 6 ~ 9 )

5. ~ ( 6 ~ 9 )

6. ~~ ()

7. ~~ ()

8. ~~ DIY

1. 2. 150

2. 450

31 97 3

221

3. 5. 1,250

1.

2.

3.

()

()

1

2

3

4

6 6 6 6

1826

039-225650

393

1.

2.

3. DIY

1. 2.

60

-

222

2. 100cc

()4. 150

3. DIY6. 50

1.

2.

3.

()

DIY

()

()

()()()

()()SWOT

() 7 7 7 7 47 5 350 600 48 3 393 1,000

31 97 3

223

()

8 8 8 8 3 3 60 120 150 3 6 20 300 100

()

9999 1-12 DIY 1-12

-

224

10 10 10 10

60 120 420 150 63,000

20 300 700 100 70,000

()

11111111

DIY

DIY

()

31 97 3

225

12121212

DIY

DIY

DIY

DIY

DIY

()

13

60 120 420 150 63,000 3 600

20 300 700 100 70,000 3 1,000

-

226

SWOT

SWOT

()S

1. S1

2. S24748

3. S3

4. S4

()W

1. W1

2. W2

3. W3

()O

1. O1

2. O2

3. O3

4. O4

5. O5

6. O6

7. O7

()T

31 97 3

227

1. T1

2. T2

3. T3

4. T4

5. T5

()SWOT

11114444 SWOTSWOTSWOTSWOT

S W

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

2.

3.

O SO WO

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

S1O4

S2O1O2O3O4

S2O1

S3O5

S4S5O6

W1O5

W2O5

W2W3O4

T ST WT

1.

2.

3.

S1T4

S4S5T2

S4S5T3

W1W2T1T2

W3T1T2T3

-

228

4.

5.

T5

4C

31 97 3

229

()

1.

2.

3.

()

1.

2.

3.

11998178-10

220024121

32003

-

230

42000329-10

52002396

619957631-36

72000pp.25-35

820031

92003

7

101996505-13

112000

324

122000325

131991