© jim barritt 2005school of biological sciences, victoria university, wellington msc student...
TRANSCRIPT
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
MSc Student Supervisors : Dr Stephen Hartley, Dr Marcus Frean
Victoria University, Wellington
Jim Barritt
Spatially explicit simulation of individual foraging behaviour across
patchy resources
http://www.oulu.fi/
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Introduction
• Spatial ecology- Animal Movement
- Resource distribution (patches)
• Study species- Cabbage white butterfly (Pieris rapae)
- Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)
- Parasitoid wasps (Cotesia glomerata)
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Study species
• Herbivorous caterpillars• Host plants are cabbages (Brassicaceae family)
http://www.oulu.fi/ © Smithsonian Institute
Cabbage White (Pieris rapae) Diamondback (Plutella xylostella)
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Parasitoids
Cotesia glomerata Parasatised (brown) Pieris rapae pupa
Cotesia glomerata emerge from Pieris larvae.
© www.aries.ento.vt.edu/ento © www.aries.ento.vt.edu/ento
© www.aries.ento.vt.edu/ento
© Marc Hasenbank
Parasitoid eggs.
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Foraging for an oviposition site
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Foraging for an oviposition site
Which cabbage ?
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Hypotheses
• Define a relationship between- Number of eggs per plant
- Density of plants in a patch
• Three alternatives….
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
1 Ideal Free Distribution
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
2 Resource concentration
• DRAW A PICTURE HERE
• Resource concentration hypothesis - Root (1973)
• Resource dilution hypothesis - Grez & Gonzalez (1995)
• Ideal free distribution- Fretwell & Lucas (1970)
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
3 Resource Dilution
• Insert a picture here!!!
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Hypotheses
• Correlation between plant density and eggs per plant
• BUT …
• Density and Isolation depend on scale …
Resource concentration Resource dilution Ideal free distribution
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
“Density” and “Isolation” are scale dependant
10 m
10 m
1 plant
20 plants, density = 0.2 plants / m2
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
“Density” and “Isolation” are scale dependant
30 m
30 m
1 plant
54 plants, density = 0.06 plants / m2
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
“Density” and “Isolation” are scale dependant
432 plants, density = 18.75 plants / m2
90 m
90 m
1 plant
Figures incorporating concept from S.Hartley
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Project Aims
• Create a simulation environment- Baseline from published simulation methods- Introduce biologically realistic mechanisms- Integrated statistical analysis, e.g. ‘R’ (http://www.r-project.org/)
• Investigate resource distribution hypotheses at different scales- How does the scale and pattern of movement relate to egg
distributions at different scales ?- Move length, directionality, dispersal ability- Can we observe different effects at different scales ?
• Explore multi-species dynamics (Parasitoids)
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Existing Simulations
• Observational (Jones 1977)- Based on field observations
- Maximum likelihood estimation for parameters
• Correlated Random walk (Cain 1985)- Importance of mortality
• Perceptual (Olden et al 2004)- E.g. Visual or Olfactory
- Perceptual range
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Observational
MOVE (directionality)
LAY (plant species, plant age)
STOP (plant species, plant age, fecundity of butterfly)
CONT
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Correlated Random Walk
Start
Plant
Radius of detection
Figure from Cain (1985)
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Perceptual
• Olfactory / visual stimuli
• Direction influenced by stimuli
• Stimulus strength- Caterpillars munching
• Wind
Start
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Methods
• Simulation framework (Java)- Provide a spatially and temporally explicit
“landscape”- Continuous space- Grid-based “view”- Agents interact with landscape
• Common output allows different simulation methods to be compared
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
First Steps
• “Random walk into a pit”- Based on experiments using pitfall traps
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Summary
• Spatially explicit simulation
• Individual foraging behavior- Biological realism (olfactory and
visual)- Effects of scale
• Resource concentration / dilution hypotheses
• Predator (Parasitoid) / Prey interactions
http://www.oulu.fi/
Jim Barritt ([email protected])
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Acknowledgements
• Thanks to- Dr Stephen Hartley
- Dr Marcus Frean
- Marc Hasenbank
- Victoria University Bug Group
http://www.oulu.fi/ © Smithsonian Institute © www.aries.ento.vt.edu/ento
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
References
Aldrich, J. (1997). R.A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912-1922. Statistical Science 12, pp.162-176.
Bukovinszky, T., R. P. J. Potting, Y. Clough, J. C. van Lenteren, and L. E. M. Vet. (2005). The role of pre- and post-alighting detection mechanisms in the responses to patch size by specialist herbivores. Oikos 109, pp. 435-446.
Byers, J. A. (2001). Correlated random walk equations of animal dispersal resolved by simulation. Ecology 82, pp.1680-1690.
Cain, M. L. (1985). Random Search by Herbivorous Insects: A Simulation Model. Ecology 66, pp. 876-888.
Finch, S., and R. H. Collier. (2000). Host-plant selection by insects - a theory based on 'appropriate/inappropriate landings' by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 96, pp. 91-102.
Fretwell, S. D., and H. L. Lucas. (1970). On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19, pp. 16-36.
Grez, A. A., and R. H. Gonzalez. (1995). Resource Concentration Hypothesis - Effect of Host-Plant Patch Size on Density of Herbivorous Insects. Oecologia 103, pp. 471-474.
Holmgren, N. M. A., and W. M. WGetz. (2000). Evolution of host plant selection in insect under perceptual constraints: A simulation study. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2, pp. 81-106.
Jones, R. E. (1977). Movement Patterns and Egg Distribution in Cabbage Butterflies. The Journal of Animal Ecology 46, pp. 195-212.
Olden, J. D., R. L. Schooley, J. B. Monroe, and N. L. Poff. ( 2004). Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, pp. 1190-1194.
Otway, S. J., A. Hector, and J. H. Lawton. (2005). Resource dilution effects on specialist insect herbivores in a grassland biodiversity experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, pp. 234-240.
Root, R. B. (1973). Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea). Ecological Monographs 43, pp. 95-124.
Tilman, D., and P. M. Kareiva. (1997). Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Monographs In Population Biology 30
© Jim Barritt 2005School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington
Questions ?
• Spatially explicit simulation
• Individual foraging behavior- Biological realism (olfactory and visual)- Effects of scale
• Resource concentration / dilution hypotheses
• Predator (Parasitoid) / Prey interactions
http://www.oulu.fi/
Jim Barritt ([email protected])