® ® focus on place types. ® ® focus on: approach and classification transitions guidance
TRANSCRIPT
®
®
Focus on Place Types
®
®
Focus on:
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance
3
®
®
Workshop 1
How can the Smart Mobility Framework project make a single definition and a single set of smart mobility principles meaningful for application throughout the state?
4
Places Types in Use
Blueprint Planning
Context Sensitive Solutions
TOD
Form Based Codes
5
®
®
Smart Mobility Place Types
For classifying towns, cities and larger areas to identify an appropriate Smart Mobility Framework
A basis for making investment, planning and management decisions that support smart mobility
6
®
®
Smart Mobility Place Types
1. Urban Centers
2. Close-in Compact Communities
3. Compact Communities
4. Suburban Communities
5. Rural and Agricultural Lands
6. Protected Lands
7. Special Use Areas
7
Complete Community Design
Regional Accessibility
Urban Centers Highest High
Close In Compact High High
Compact High Moderate to low
Suburban Variable Variable
Rural / Ag Variable Low
Protected Very Low Variable
Special Use Low Variable
Place Types and Location Efficiency
8
®
®
Achieving Location EfficiencyAchieving Location Efficiency
9
®
®
Exhibit 7: Smart Mobility Place Types & Location Efficiency
A Closer Look
10
Urban Centers Urban Cores
Urban Centers
Close-in Compact Communities
Centers
Corridors
Neighborhoods
Dedicated Use Areas
Compact Communities
Suburban Communities
Rural & Agricultural Lands
Rural Towns
Rural settlements and Agricultural Lands
Protected Lands
Special Use Areas
11
®
®
Exhibit 6: Place Type DetailRank on Smart Mobility
Factors Place Type
Summary Description (existing or planned character) Complete
Community Design
Regional Accessibility
(Preliminary)
Examples
1. Urban Centers
High density, mixed use places with high jobs-housing ratios overall, well-connected street networks, high levels of transit service and pedestrian supportive environments. Transit-oriented development (TOD) fits into all of the urban place types.
1a. Urban Cores
Central cities and downtowns of major cities, with full range of horizontally- and vertically-mixed land uses and with high capacity transit stations/corridors present or planned. Hubs of transit systems with excellent transit coverage, service levels, and intermodal passenger transfer opportunities.
Highest Highest
Downtowns of Long Beach, San Francisco, San J ose, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Diego, Oakland
1b. Urban Centers
Major activity centers within urban areas, with full range of horizontally- and vertically-mixed land uses and with high capacity transit stations/corridors present or planned.
High High
I rvine, Berkeley, Palo Alto, Pasadena, Walnut Creek, Santa Rosa, Century City, Fresno, Stockton, Bakersfield, Modesto
Page 23
®
®
Discussion
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance
®
®
Focus on:
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance
14
®
®
Place Type Transitions
Place types are tools for strategic decision-making about projects and programs that will support smart mobility as cities and towns change over time
15
®
®
Place Type Transitions
Anchored Places. Ranking on the Smart Mobility factors may change somewhat but place type designation will not change.
Transitional Places. Targeted for significant change that will result in a change in place type designation.
Place Type Transition
16
Place Type Transition
17
Place Type Transition
18
Change in Anchored Place Type
19
20
®
®
Place Type Transitions: Implications for Investments
Anchored Places. Investment decisions emphasize enhancing Smart Mobility factors.
Transitional Places. Investment emphasis is on supporting evolution to different place type with greater potential for Smart Mobility benefits.
(Page 28, related exhibit p. 29)
21
Place Type Transition
Place TypeSM
EmphasisUltimate Place Type
Urban Centers Urban Center
Close-in Compact Communities
orClose-in compact communitiesorUrban Centers
Compact Communities
Compact Communities
Exhibit 8, page 29
®
®
Discussion
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance
®
®
Focus on:
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance
24
®
®
Place Type Guidance
For Each Place Type Smart Mobility Framework Relevance of Principles Key Activities
Planning Transportation Projects & Programs Development & Conservation Projects &
Programs
25
®
®
FrameworkMinimize creation of new
places ranking low on both factors
Transition suburban centers and corridors to close-in compact centers and corridors
Create benefits for surrounding suburban areas
Example: Suburban Communities
LOW
High
High
26
®
®
Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities
Planning: Key Activities Identify centers and corridors that can be
transformed into more location-efficient places.
Prioritize locations to align with market potential and other community objectives.
Identify near term opportunities to improve health and safety
Identify opportunities to improve reliability through operational improvements
27
®
®
Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities
Likely transportation priorities Improving operational efficiency Improving connectivity “Complete streets” and safe routes to
school Access management and speed
management Commute transit service and
rideshare promotion.
28
®
®
Example: Guidance for Suburban Communities
Likely land use development priorities:
Transit oriented development along high capacity transit corridors
Strategic redevelopment of commercial corridors and dedicated use areas
Complete community design elements for all new construction
29
®
®
Place Types in the Handbook
Introduction Place Types and Location Efficiency Place Type Transitions Matching the Place Types to Real
Places Guidance for Place Types Applying Performance Measures to
Place Types
®
®
Discussion in Small Groups
Approach and Classification
Transitions
Guidance