• cuvette system

1
MEMS Sensors and Actuators Laboratory Cuvette System - Utilized cuvettes for Escherichia coli biofilm growth and uniform electric field applications - Pyrex TM chip to provide constant biofilm growth surface area AN ENHANCED BACTERIAL BIOFILM TREATMENT USING SUPERPOSITIONED ELECTRIC FIELD Young Wook Kim 1,2 , Hadar Ben-Yoav 1,2 , Hsuan-Chen Wu 3 , David Quan 3 , Karen Carter 3 , Mariana T. Meyer 1,3 William E. Bentley 3 , and Reza Ghodssi 1,2,3 1 MEMS Sensors and Actuators Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3 Fischell Department of Bioengineering University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA - Biofilm is comprised of a dense matrix of bacterial cells, polysaccharides, and exoproteins. Frequently cause recalcitrant infections of medical implants, urinary and respiratory tracts. - Density of biofilm structure limits drug diffusion, making antibiotics less effective. - Develop an effective biocompatible biofilm treatment method with low dose of anitbiotic. - Demonstrate an enhanced bioelectric effect for clinical biofilm treatment. : Superposition of DC and AC electric fields with antibiotic showed significant improvement of biofilm treatment efficacy. Experimental Setup Results Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Robert W . Deutsch Foundation and National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (NSF-EFRI). The authors also appreciate the support of the Maryland NanoCenter and its Fablab. *Corresponding Author: Professor Reza Ghodssi, Tel: 301-405-8158, email:[email protected] Current Work Introduction Superpositioned Electric Field (SP field) - Electrodes are separated 4 mm in the cuvette. - Applied potential (0.5V) was lower than the threshold of media electrolysis (0.82V). - Frequency of AC component was selected based on literature. => SP field = 1.25V/cm DC signal+ 1.25V/cm AC signal at 10 MHz Total Biomass Quantification - After biofilm treatment with different electric field applications (AC, DC or SP field), total biomass was quantified by crystal violet staining. - Optical density (OD 540 ) of the stain corresponds to the biomass. Cell Viability of Biofilms After Treatments - Live bacterial cell in biofilms after treatment was quantified by colony form unit (CFU) assay • Development of an integrated microsystem for biofilm detection and treatment SP-BE DC-BE AC-BE Antibiot ic Control OD 540 ` AC field Bacterial cell DNA Antibioti c ` DC field Concentration gradient Bacterial cell DNA Schematic of DC field effect on bacterial cell Schematic of AC field effect on bacterial cell Principles of Bioelectric Effect (hypothesis) - Bacteria are composed of fully and partially charged molecules. - DC electric field induces a non-uniform distribution of antibiotics and electrolytes. - AC electric field increases cell membrane permeability due to local molecular vibration. Superpositioned Bioelectric Effect Treatment - Superposition of AC and DC electric fields in the presence of antibiotics drastically enhances biofilm treatment efficacy - 1.25 V/cm AC signal at 10 MHz with a 1.25 V/cm DC offset with gentamicin (10 µg/mL) 1 2 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Log reduction of viable bacteria AC-BE SP-BE DC-BE Logarithmic viable cell reduction in different treatments 2.6 0.6 0.2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5x 10 --7 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Time (s) Electric field intensity (V/cm) Schematic of cuvette setup and photo Total biomass quantification results (ODs) in different treatments - Observed ~ 71% decrease of biomass by SP field treatment respect to the control Samples Viable biofilm cells (CFU/mL) (average ± stdev) Log 10 of viable biofilm cells (average ± stdev) Control 2.1410 8 8.330 Gentamicin (1.95 ± 0.01)10 8 8.290 ± 0.004 AC field (2.01 ± 0.02)10 8 8.303 ± 0.008 DC field (1.62 ± 0.04)10 8 8.210 ± 0.021 SP field (1.99 ± 0.01)10 8 8.299 ± 0.004 AC-BE (1.39 ± 0.09) 10 8 8.143 ± 0.056 DC-BE (5.69 ± 0.40)10 7 7.755 ± 0.061 SP-BE (5.63 ± 0.40)10 5 5.750 ± 0.062 - Demonstrated ~ 400 times more live bacteria reduction by SP field treatment - Significant enhanced biofilm treatment by superpositioning AC and DC electric fields Viable cell densities in different treatments Microscopy image of control (no treatment) Microscopy image of SP-BE SP-BE (2.6) >> AC-BE (0.2) + DC-BE (0.6) Significant synergistic treatment effect was induced by the superposition. Superpositioned electric field (DC + AC fields) Bacterial Biofilm SAW Sensor Electrodes for biofilm treatment Schematic of an Integrated SAW sensor with Bioelectric Effect

Upload: catori

Post on 24-Feb-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

2.5. 2. 1.5. Electric field intensity (V/cm). 1. 0.5. 0. --7. 0. 0.5. 1. 1.5. 2. 2.5. x 10. Time (s). Log reduction of viable bacteria. DC-BE. AC-BE. SP-BE. An Enhanced bacterial biofilm treatment using superpositioned electric field - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: •    Cuvette System

MEMS Sensors and Actuators Laboratory

• Cuvette System- Utilized cuvettes for Escherichia coli biofilm growth and uniform electric field applications- PyrexTM chip to provide constant biofilm growth surface area

AN ENHANCED BACTERIAL BIOFILM TREATMENT USING SUPERPOSITIONED ELECTRIC FIELD

Young Wook Kim1,2, Hadar Ben-Yoav1,2, Hsuan-Chen Wu3, David Quan3, Karen Carter3, Mariana T. Meyer1,3

William E. Bentley3, and Reza Ghodssi 1,2,3

1MEMS Sensors and Actuators Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3Fischell Department of Bioengineering

University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

- Biofilm is comprised of a dense matrix of bacterial cells, polysaccharides, and exoproteins. Frequently cause recalcitrant infections of medical implants, urinary and respiratory tracts.- Density of biofilm structure limits drug diffusion, making antibiotics less effective.- Develop an effective biocompatible biofilm treatment method with low dose of anitbiotic.- Demonstrate an enhanced bioelectric effect for clinical biofilm treatment. : Superposition of DC and AC electric fields with antibiotic showed significant improvement of biofilm treatment efficacy.Experimental Setup

Results

Acknowledgements • The authors would like to thank Robert W . Deutsch Foundation and National Science Foundation

Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (NSF-EFRI). The authors also appreciate the support of the Maryland NanoCenter and its Fablab.

• *Corresponding Author: Professor Reza Ghodssi, Tel: 301-405-8158, email:[email protected]

Current Work

Introduction

• Superpositioned Electric Field (SP field)- Electrodes are separated 4 mm in the cuvette.- Applied potential (0.5V) was lower than the threshold of media electrolysis

(0.82V).- Frequency of AC component was selected based on literature.=> SP field = 1.25V/cm DC signal+ 1.25V/cm AC signal at 10 MHz

• Total Biomass Quantification- After biofilm treatment with different electric field applications (AC, DC or

SP field), total biomass was quantified by crystal violet staining.- Optical density (OD540) of the stain corresponds to the biomass.

• Cell Viability of Biofilms After Treatments- Live bacterial cell in biofilms after treatment was quantified by colony form

unit (CFU) assay

• Development of an integrated microsystem for biofilm detection and treatment

SP-BE 

DC-BEAC-BEAntibioticControl

OD540

`

AC field Bacterial cell

DNA

Antibiotic

`

DC fieldConcentration

gradientBacterial cell

DNA

Schematic of DC field effect on bacterial cell

Schematic of AC field effect on bacterial cell

Principles of Bioelectric Effect (hypothesis)- Bacteria are composed of fully and partially charged molecules.- DC electric field induces a non-uniform distribution of antibiotics and electrolytes.- AC electric field increases cell membrane permeability due to local molecular vibration.Superpositioned Bioelectric Effect Treatment- Superposition of AC and DC electric fields in the presence of antibiotics drastically enhances biofilm treatment efficacy- 1.25 V/cm AC signal at 10 MHz with a 1.25 V/cm DC offset with gentamicin (10 µg/mL)

1 2 30

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Log

redu

ctio

n of

via

ble

bact

eria

AC-BE SP-BEDC-BELogarithmic viable cell reduction in different

treatments

2.6

0.6

0.20 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5x 10--70

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Time (s)

Elec

tric

fiel

d in

tens

ity

(V/c

m)

Schematic of cuvette setup and photo

Total biomass quantification results (ODs) in different treatments- Observed ~ 71% decrease of biomass by SP field treatment respect to the

control

Samples Viable biofilm cells (CFU/mL)(average ± stdev)

Log10 of viable biofilm cells(average ± stdev)

Control 2.14108 8.330Gentamicin (1.95 ± 0.01)108 8.290 ± 0.004

AC field (2.01 ± 0.02)108 8.303 ± 0.008DC field (1.62 ± 0.04)108 8.210 ± 0.021SP field (1.99 ± 0.01)108 8.299 ± 0.004AC-BE (1.39 ± 0.09) 108 8.143 ± 0.056DC-BE (5.69 ± 0.40)107 7.755 ± 0.061SP-BE (5.63 ± 0.40)105 5.750 ± 0.062

- Demonstrated ~ 400 times more live bacteria reduction by SP field treatment

- Significant enhanced biofilm treatment by superpositioning AC and DC electric fields

Viable cell densities in different treatments

Microscopy image of control (no treatment)

Microscopy image of SP-BE

• SP-BE (2.6) >> AC-BE (0.2) + DC-BE (0.6)

• Significant synergistic treatment effect was induced by the superposition.

Superpositioned electric field (DC + AC fields)

Bacterial Biofilm

SAW Sensor

Electrodes for biofilm treatment

Schematic of an Integrated SAW sensor with Bioelectric Effect