© boardworks ltd 2007 1 of 23 © boardworks ltd 2007 britain 1066–1500 1 of 23 the battle of...
TRANSCRIPT
© Boardworks Ltd 20071 of 23 © Boardworks Ltd 2007
Britain 1066–1500
1 of 23
The Battle of Hastings
Icons key: For more detailed instructions, see the Getting Started presentation
Teacher’s notes included in the Notes Page
Accompanying worksheet
Flash activity. These activities are not editable.
Web addresses Sound
© Boardworks Ltd 20072 of 23
Learning objectives
How did Harold plan to defend England?
Who won the Battle of Stamford Bridge?
How did William invade England?
Who won the Battle of Hastings, and why?
Lea
rnin
g o
bje
ctiv
es
© Boardworks Ltd 20073 of 23
1066: the story so far…
In 1066, King Edward the Confessor died without an heir.
Three men emerged as contenders for the English crown.
Can you remember who they were?
© Boardworks Ltd 20074 of 23
Harold, son of Earl Godwin, was chosen king by the chief
noblemen of England…
Florence of Worcester, 1115
In the end the Witenagemot decided that Harold Godwinson should be the next king.
So who did become king?
Harold was crowned in Westminster Abbey in January 1066. But he had no time to celebrate. William of Normandy and Harald Hardraada were both determined to take the crown by force.
© Boardworks Ltd 20075 of 23
Harold’s dilemma
© Boardworks Ltd 20076 of 23
King Harold knew that he would have a lot of difficulty holding onto England. He did not know which of his enemies would make the first move, but he assumed it would be William, so he stationed his troops on the south coast.
What did Harold do?
© Boardworks Ltd 20077 of 23
Unfortunately for Harold, his gamble did not pay off. The first person to invade was Harald Hardraada. William was waiting for the right wind for his ships.
Harold had to march his army north to meet Hardraada, and then get back to the south again before the wind changed and allowed William to invade.
Hardraada arrived at the mouth of the Tyne with more than 300 ships on 20th September 1066. The earls Edwin and Morcar fought the Norwegians, but eventually lost.
Hardraada invades
© Boardworks Ltd 20078 of 23
Then came our King Harold on the Norwegians unawares, and met them beyond York at Stamford …
Harald Hardraada was killed, and Earl Tosti; the Norwegians that were left were put to flight … Only 24
ships returned to Norway.
The Battle of Stamford Bridge was a great victory for Harold, but two days later the wind changed and William’s invasion fleet set sail. William landed at Pevensey on the Sussex coast on 28th September.
Why was the change in the wind such bad timing? Who had the better chance of winning the next
battle? Why?
The Battle of Stamford Bridge
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
© Boardworks Ltd 20079 of 23
…although [Harold] knew that he had lost some of his best men in the recent battle, and
that half of his troops were not yet assembled, he did not
hesitate to meet the enemy.
Florence of Worcester, 1115
What does this text tell you about the type of man Harold was?
What advice would you have given him and why?
The next battle
© Boardworks Ltd 200710 of 23
The road to Hastings
© Boardworks Ltd 200711 of 23
The Norman army was made up of…
Archers (armed with bows and arrows) Cavalry (men on horseback, armed with swords)Foot soldiers (armed mainly with spears)Total strength = approx. 6000 men
The Norman army
All William’s soldiers had training and experience. Many were professional mercenaries.
© Boardworks Ltd 200712 of 23
The Saxon army
The Saxon army was made up of…
Housecarls – professional soldiers armed with battleaxesFyrd – armed with spears andsometimes swordsTotal strength = approx. 6000 men
The housecarls were highly trained and formed the core of the army. The fyrd were ordinary men called up to serve in times of emergency. They were unpaid and had little or no training.
© Boardworks Ltd 200713 of 23
The Battle of Hastings
© Boardworks Ltd 200714 of 23
How much do you remember?
© Boardworks Ltd 200715 of 23
The Bayeux Tapestry
Much of our information about the Battle of Hastings comes from the Bayeux Tapestry. This is a large embroidery commemorating the Norman conquest of England. It is believed to have been commissioned by William’s half-brother, Bishop Odo, who fought alongside him at Hastings.
Unfortunately, there are two problems with the Bayeux Tapestry as a source. One is that it can be difficult to work
out what’s happening at certain points. Can you guess what the other problem might be?
© Boardworks Ltd 200716 of 23
The Bayeux Tapestry
© Boardworks Ltd 200717 of 23
The Bayeux Tapestry
© Boardworks Ltd 200718 of 23
The Bayeux Tapestry
© Boardworks Ltd 200719 of 23
The death of Harold
Everybody knows that William won the Battle of Hastings and Harold lost. But how exactly did Harold die?
Imagine you are a detective investigating a murder. You interview the witnesses, but they disagree with each other. Some may be mistaken. Some may be lying. So you examine the other evidence, but it isn’t very
clear. In fact, it may even have been tampered with.
This is the situation historians face in investigating the death of Harold.
© Boardworks Ltd 200720 of 23
Pictorial evidence – the Bayeux Tapestry
© Boardworks Ltd 200721 of 23
…Harold fell, his brain pierced by an arrow. One
of the soldiers with a sword gashed his thigh as
he lay on the ground. William of Malmesbury,
1140
Harold and his two brothers had fallen close together. The King could not be recognized
by his face which had been cut by a sword – only by certain
marks on his body. William of Poitiers, 1071
Do these sources agree with each other?
How do they help to explain the scene on the Bayeux Tapestry showing Harold’s death?
Written evidence
Now we’ve looked at the pictorial evidence for the battle, let’s see whether the written evidence backs it up.
© Boardworks Ltd 200722 of 23
Comparing sources
© Boardworks Ltd 200723 of 23
So how did Harold die?