© 2004 discussit.org notice this presentation may be copied and distributed without cost. it may...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
© 2004 discussit.org
NOTICETHIS PRESENTATION MAY BE COPIED
AND DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT COST. IT MAY ALSO BE MODIFED IF THE CREDITS AND THIS NOTICE ARE NOT REMOVED.
You are encouraged to send copies of derived articles and upgraded slides to [email protected]. The most recent version of this work may be found at www.discussIT.org.
© 2004 discussit.org
e-GuidewaysBruce A. McHenry
Bruce A. McHenrywww.discussIT.org
April 2nd, 2004Revision 2.01PRJ
© 2004 discussit.org
AcknowledgementsPresentation created by:
Bruce A. McHenry e-Guideway Association ([email protected])Modified by Palle R Jensen
Particular thanks to:RUF International (Palle Jensen)MegaRail Transportation Systems (Kirston Henderson)
Special thanks to Professor Jerry SchneiderUniversity of Washington for hisInnovative Transportation Technologies web site
© 2004 discussit.org
Transportation is Vital to US• Consumes 19% of average household expenditures ($7,759)• 4,000,000,000,000 passenger-miles in four-wheel vehicles• 200,000,000 four-wheel vehicles• Consumes 14 million barrels/day out of 20 million total• Air carriers only 500,000,000,000 passenger miles (1/8 of car miles)
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
© 2004 discussit.org
Current Political Sense
“Freedom Car”
High Speed Trains
Maglev Trains
Light Rail
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
• Electrolysis, distribution, storage and conversion of H2 incurs substantial energy losses
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
• On-board storage is highly problematic (-420ºF liquid; 90,000psi gas; at best 100 kilos / gallon equivalent using metal hydride)
• Losses incurred during catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons are not offset by efficiency of H2 fuel cells
• Electrolysis, distribution, storage and conversion of H2 incurs substantial energy losses
• Solves none of the “presenting complaints” about congestion, safety, etc.
© 2004 discussit.org
High Speed Trains
• < 300 miles: slower than 100MPH guideways door-to-door and far more costly on passenger-mile basis
• > 300 miles: slower and more expensive than planes
Maglev trains have similar characteristics, only much, much more expensive.
© 2004 discussit.org
Light Rail
• Typically serves only 1% of commuters where used
• Average subsidy per passenger equivalent to purchasing a car
• Relatively slow
• Requires large amount of public space
© 2004 discussit.org
“Freedom Car”
High Speed Trains
Maglev Trains
Light Rail
© 2004 discussit.org
Winning Platforms
e-Cars Hybrid Electric Cars
e-Guideways
© 2004 discussit.org
Remember…
© 2004 discussit.org
3000 killed100 billion damage
© 2004 discussit.org
3000 killed every month100 billion damage every year
42,000 deaths/yr.10x injuries
100 billion/year property damage
Photo: Philip Greenspun
© 2004 discussit.org
October November December
January February March
April May June
July August Sept.
October November December
January February March
April May June
July August Sept.
October November December20022003
January
What would politicians do if a 9/11 happened every month?
© 2004 discussit.org
What is a Dualmode Vehicle?
A dualmode vehicle travels under manual control on the street network for some portion of its trip, and operates under automatic control on an exclusive guideway for some other portion.
Images courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
What is an e-Guideway?
Animation depicting cars assembling into car-trains on the guideway.
Ruftrain.exeAnimation courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
WHY?
© 2004 discussit.org
1. Safety
Images courtesy of RUF International & AVT Train.com
Guideways support high speeds with great safety…
© 2004 discussit.org
… because they are separated from crossing vehicles and animals.
© 2004 discussit.org
Footnote: Braking on the guideway would be swift and certain.
Images courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
50-75% average aerodynamic drag reductionbecause only the first and last cars experience large drag forces
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
>>2x reduction in rolling resistance because:
1) if the steel guideway
is very smooth…
2) then the wheels can be hard with low rolling resistance
e.g. multiple polyethylene wheels that will roll smoothly over expansion joints
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
In RUF design, rail wheels are
smooth wheels.
Traction friction can be
adjusted by changing
pressure against top rail
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
Another 3x reduction in rolling resistance possible due to:
3) appropriatesize, low average weight (1000 lbs.)
> 6x less rolling resistance
Photos courtesy of Global Electric Motorcars, LLC
© 2004 discussit.org
Maglev?
Magnetic levitation can offer much more reduction in rolling resistance.
However, aerodynamic drag would still dominate running efficiency.
Image courtesy of AVT-Train.com
© 2004 discussit.org
Maglev?
Magnetic levitation might someday offer much more reduction in rolling resistance.
However, aerodynamic drag would still dominate running efficiency.
Image courtesy of AVT-Train.com
© 2004 discussit.org
2. MUCH MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT
2-4x aerodynamic & 6x rolling friction reductions
=> Running efficiency improves 2-4X
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
Cd = 0.15 Cd = 0.07 w/o wheels
Image courtesy of Roane Inventions
© 2004 discussit.org
Running Efficiency Gain
1:3
© 2004 discussit.org
Allows cars to be lighter and much less expensive to run.
3. MOSTLY ELECTRIC PROPULSION
Electrified guideway
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
3. MOSTLY ELECTRIC PROPULSION
Solves range problem of all-electric cars. Makes e-cars practical…within urban areasor between them.
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
What is the Propulsion Efficiency?
New natural gas power plants (50%)
Transmission efficiency (85%)
Electric motor efficiency (90%)
Overall: 38%
Compare with 15% for typical internal combustion engine (ICE) or 25% for hybrid-electric
© 2004 discussit.org
Propulsion Efficiency Gain
2:3
© 2004 discussit.org
Overall Efficiency Gain
1:4.5
© 2004 discussit.org
Conventionally Sized Van: 25 MPG at 65 MPH
At 100 MPH it would get 11 MPG.(25 / (100/65)2)
Efficiency decreases approximately as square of speed when aerodynamic drag predominates
New CAFÉ?
© 2004 discussit.org
Conventionally Sized e-Van: 11 * 4.5 = 50 MPG at 100 MPH
Prius (mid-size) Car:30 MPG at 100 MPH30 * 4.5 = 135 MPG at 100 MPH
New CAFÉ?
© 2004 discussit.org
$1.70MEDIAN SIZE CAR:
15HP at 55MPH
ON e-GUIDEWAY:→ 100MPH with 3x better running efficiency…
Generation & transmission cost of 1 kWh: $0.10
What is the electricity cost to travel 100 miles in an hour? Running efficiency gain = 3Efficiency of electric motor = 90%Loss due to higher speed = (100/55)3 = 6.0Power needed at 100MPH: 15*6/3*0.9 = 33 HP or 25 kW
Cost to Power a Mid-Size Car?
© 2004 discussit.org
$2.50MEDIAN SIZE CAR:
15HP at 55MPH
ON e-GUIDEWAY:→ 100MPH with 3x better running efficiency…
Generation & transmission cost of 1 kWh: $0.10
What is the electricity cost to travel 100 miles in an hour? Running efficiency gain = 3Efficiency of electric motor = 90%Loss due to higher speed = (100/55)3 = 6.0Power needed at 100MPH: 15*6/3*0.9 = 33 HP or 25 kW
Cost to Power a Mid-Size Car?
© 2004 discussit.org
$1.50 on e-Guideway at 100 MPH
2.5 cents per mile
vs.
50 MPG at 70 MPH
2 gallons at $1.50 = $3.00
3.0 cents per mile
100 Miles in Mid-Size Car?
© 2004 discussit.org
4. LAND USE
Guideways carry about 10x as many passengers/hr as a normal lane. (2200/hr vs. 22,000/hr)
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
4. MUCH LOWER LAND USE
Because about 1/10th footprint of an ordinary lane
Image courtesy of MegaRail Transportation Systems
Image courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
1:100
© 2004 discussit.org
less than
1:100
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Any time, door-to-door
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Image courtesy of RUF International
Congestion free
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
Can work, sleep or play
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
Images courtesy of RUF International
© 2004 discussit.org
5. USER COMFORT & CONVENIENCE
• Any time, door-to-door
• Congestion free
• Can work, sleep or play• Faster than air travel up to 500 miles. > Door-to-door DC to NYC areas: <3 hours > Sleep across the nation over the weekend At 3 cents per mile, $100 one-way single- occupancy
© 2004 discussit.org
6. DRAMATICALLY REDUCED CAR MAINTENANCE
• Vastly simpler electric motor– No ignition system– No valves– No piston rings– No motor vibration
• Regenerative braking
• No muffler
• No clutch
• No high speed salt spray
© 2004 discussit.org
7. INEXPENSIVE SHORT-TERM CAR RENTAL
Because of low maintenance, virtually zero accidents, and reduced pick-up and point-of-return constraints. Will order cars according to need, e.g.:
• One person commuter car • Family outing SUV• Cargo van• Sleeper cars• etc.
© 2004 discussit.org
8. AUTOMATED FREIGHT
• Less need for trans-shipment terminals.
• Faster
• Greater predictability and shorter lead times facilitate “just-in-time” delivery systems
© 2004 discussit.org
9. NATIONAL SECURITY
End dependence on Middle East oil
=> Freedom from risk of supply disruption
=> May end funding repressive régimes
© 2004 discussit.org
BUT• Does it make economic sense?
• Will it fit downtown?
• What about the visual impact?
• How long will it take?
© 2004 discussit.org
COST?
© 2004 discussit.org
Cost Components1.Power generation
2.Guideway construction
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use 3.7 billion Mwh (2003)
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway 1,000 miles/yr or 67hrs/yr at 15 mph and 2kW = 134 kWh/vehicle/yr30,000 miles/yr or 300 hrs/yr at 100 mph and 25 kW = 6,900 Kwh/vehicle/yr
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh15 * 0.75 * (100/55)3 / 3 * 1.11 = 25 Kw on guideway 1,000 miles/yr or 67hrs/yr at 15 mph and 2kW = 134 kWh/vehicle/yr30,000 miles/yr or 300 hrs/yr at 100 mph and 25 kW = 6,900 Kwh/vehicle/yr150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand1,400 billion ton-miles of truck freight partially converted to1,000 billion ton-miles of e-van freightAverage van load: 800 lbs2000/800 * 1000 = 2,500 billion miles of e-van freighte-van uses 40 Kwh on guideway per 100 miles.4 * 2500 = 1000 billion Kwh = 1.0 billion Mwh e-freight
© 2004 discussit.org
New Power Demand
Current national use of 3.7 billion Mwh150 million e-cars * 7 Mwh = 1.5 billion Mwh avg. demand.4 * 2500 = 1000 billion Kwh = 1.0 billion Mwh e-freight
Projected demand increase due to e-guideways is2.5 billion Mwh
Probable doubling of electricity supply
© 2004 discussit.org
We can generate another 4 billion Mwh.
If fuel costs increase sharply, we will know that we MUST generate another 4 billion Mwh.
© 2004 discussit.org
So while DEMAND CAN BE MET WITH OIL OR GAS FIRED POWER PLANTS, we might use
New Power Systems
© 2004 discussit.org
So while DEMAND CAN BE MET WITH OIL OR GAS FIRED POWER PLANTS, we might use
Wind Farms
Image courtesy of Energy Electronics Institute, National AIST, Japan
Solar Cell Farms
© 2004 discussit.org
&
© 2004 discussit.org
We might also use meltdown-proof nuclear reactors based on transportableuranium pebbles
Image courtesy of Eskom, South Africa
© 2004 discussit.org
“Pebble Bed” Nuclear Power
Ima
ge c
ourt
esy
of
Esk
om,
Sou
th A
fric
a
© 2004 discussit.org
GuidewayConstruction
Cost?
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles of Guideway?
How many miles needed for metropolitan areas?
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles of Guideway?
WDC is a metro area with 6 million residents30x30 mile grid with 2 mile separation
=> 30 * (15+15) = 900 miles150 miles per million residents-or-100 subway miles * 4 = 400100 beltway miles = 100Total miles = 600100 miles per million residents
© 2004 discussit.org
How Many Miles Total?
• 100 miles per million metro area residents
• 200 million metro area residents nationwide
=> 20,000 miles of metro guideway
40,000 miles along interstates
© 2004 discussit.org
Cost of E-Guideway
EXPENSIVE!.. and we can only take an educated guess:
• 20,000 metropolitan miles @ $40 million per mile = $800 billion
• 40,000 miles of interstate @ $5 million per mile = $200 billion
• System cost about the same as initial construction of the interstate highway system ($1 trillion)
© 2004 discussit.org
e-Guideways will be Expensive
so…Can they be justified? Would they pay off?
© 2004 discussit.org
#1: Value of Saved Drive-Time
Frees up about 30 minutes from 55* min avg. daily drive time: .5 * 365 = 183 hrs/yr.
Eliminates >80% of long distance driving (4000* miles/yr): 3200 / 60 = 53 hours/yr.
120 million drivers (est.) (183 + 53) * 120M = 28,320 million hr/yr
$5/hr * 28M = $140B
* Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
© 2004 discussit.org
#2: Value of Time Not Stuck in Traffic
80% reduction of time stuck in traffic at cost of $517/person* (2001) and estimated cost of $1300 per capita by 2015 (8% growth*)0.8 * 1300 * 120M (est.) = $125B
* Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
© 2004 discussit.org
#3: Savings from Eliminated Accidents
Approximately $100 billion/yr saved on insurance premiums and cost on non-covered accidents.
Additional savings in personal medical expenses. $100B?
Value of lives saved: $40B?Injuries not suffered: $40B?
© 2004 discussit.org
#4: National Security
At least $100 billion/yr. for reduced cost of military preparedness and stabilization operation in Middle East.(e.g. Additional cost of Operation Iraqi Freedom is approximately $100 billion/yr in FY 2004, 2005)
Ought to be funded by $1 per gallon tax on 100 billions gallons consumed annually?
© 2004 discussit.org
#5: Reduced Cost of Car Maintenance & Repair
Savings of at least $50 billion/yr.
© 2004 discussit.org
#6: Reduced Cost of New Cars
Doubling the longevity of cars: $150 billion
1/3rd reduction in the price of 50% of new cars owing to the simplicity and lighter weight of all-electric drive: $50 billion offset by the increased complexity of hybrid dualmode vehicles -$50 billion.
© 2004 discussit.org
#7: Savings Due to Car Sharing
Sharing of cars much more conveniently and affordably because of greatly reduced point-of-return requirements and liability. No first car, second or third one reduces $300 billion capital investment in new cars by perhaps 10%-20% = $15-30 billion (out of $150 billion) Also, car sharing and smaller cars able to self park in dense configurations will also pare parking expenses (and make it possible to reduce or eliminate street parking). If 5% of 200m cars could pay $10 instead of $50/month to park: 10m * 40 * 12 = $5 billion.
© 2004 discussit.org
#8: Less Truck Driving
50% reduction in the cost of drivers for combination trucks: $20 billion
© 2004 discussit.org
#9: Reduced Highway Maintenance
$29 billion → $20 billion
→ much less
© 2004 discussit.org
#10: End of Subsidies for Other Transit
Light rail, bus, AMTRAK, airlines subsidies vary by year but range from $10 to $20 billion at Federal level alone.
© 2004 discussit.org
Total Value > $0.5T/yr. Suggests that the e-guideway construction costs could be paid back to society only two years after operation commences…
© 2004 discussit.org
Total Value > $0.5T/yr. Suggests that the e-guideway construction costs could be paid back to society only two years after operation commences… if vehicles are dualmode capable at that time.
© 2004 discussit.org
Another Economic Justification
e-guideway construction and associated redevelopment will employ at least 600,000 Americans ($100B / $150,000)
© 2004 discussit.org
And Many Quality of Life Benefits
• Improved mobility & safety i.e. access to friends, family & recreation
• Dramatic lowering of traffic impact on high density areas
• Potential to remodel public spaces
• Dramatic improvement in ripeness of fruits and vegetables
• Major facilitator of Internet commerce
© 2004 discussit.org
RUF International is #1
© 2004 discussit.org
Maxi-ruf: Attractive Public Transport
© 2004 discussit.org
MegaRail is #2
MegaRail Transportation Systems propose a micro-rail for urban areas and a separate higher capacity system for interstate use.
© 2004 discussit.org
Several More Serious Entrepreneurs
?Image Credits: German Autoshuttle, Tritrack, Blade Runner
© 2004 discussit.org
Needs of e-Guideways
About 10 years and about $100 billion R&D investment (10%) is desirable to optimize designs and manufacturing processes for eventual construction throughout the continent.
Progress could be greatly with a series of high value prizes for engineering “bake-offs”
Investment to date only about $4 million.
© 2004 discussit.org
What is to be Done?
Ramp R&D funding levels up towards $10 billion/yr to support series of highly rewarded engineering “bake-offs”.
Contrast with national Amtrak subsidy (>$1 billion), the “Freedom Car” ($1.5 billion), Maglev ($2.0 billion), and NASA ($10 billion).
© 2004 discussit.org
What is to be Done?
Ramp R&D funding levels up towards $10 billion/yr to support series of highly rewarded engineering “bake-offs”.
Contrast with national Amtrak subsidy (>$1 billion), the “Freedom Car” ($1.5 billion), Maglev ($2.0 billion), and NASA ($10 billion).
Presidential commitment comparable to Kennedy’s goal of a “Man on the Moon” to design and build the first system on Oahu.
© 2004 discussit.org
- OR -
• New private company with mission to develop guideway and vehicle designs
• Returns on investment expected in 5 – 15 years
• ROI to be negotiated with eventual clients, many of which could also be investors
© 2004 discussit.org
Timetable
• About 10 years for series of design competitions and prototyping including first major build in Hawaii.
• About 10 years to construct functional coast-to-coast network
• Nice target date? 2025: The bicentennial of George Stephenson’s first passenger train (1825).