presentationtelaviv.ppt - 2 - loughborough...

Tel-Aviv 1909

Lottery for the first 100 parcels, on

the dunes outside of Jaffa-1909

Tel Aviv- 1917

Basic data• Area: 5,000 hectars• Residents: 386,000• Employees: 352,000• Topography: flat, by the sea • Climate: mild

A core of the metropolitan area• 15% out of 2.2 m. employees in

Israel• Annual GPD per person –

$52,000 vs. $17,250 in Israel• TA share in the GNP – 16.7• High income per person vs.

national average and other cities

66.652.9

41.034.9 37.6 36.8

63.2

33.4

47.158.1

65.1 62.4

1961 1971 1981 2001 2005 2006

-ופי א םיקסעומ" יבשות ת -ופי א םיקסעומ" םניאש יבשות ת

שפנל תימלוג הסנכה

31,5

87

29,0

18

89,7

62

53,0

00

31,9

12

28,6

15

84,1

49

53,8

35

27,7

51

26,4

6825,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

הס"כלארשי

םילשורי לתביבא-ופי

הפיח ןושארןויצל

דודשא

2005מביחיר

, חשב

הנש"

2000 2005

63% of employees are commuters

Basic Facts about the Plan

The Strategic Planning Process

The Plan’s Principles• A multi-disciplinary approach • Dialogue based planning

including two main dimensions:

- Consultative and Participatory Dimension

- Analitycal Dimension• Early completion, including

early formulation of Action Plans

• Empowerment of the Municipality

Key features of the plan production process

City Profile Discussion Groups

North-WestNorth-West

JaffaJaffaPublicParticipation

PublicParticipation

EducationEducation

SocietySociety

CultureCulture

EconomyEconomy Land-UseLand-Use

SouthSouth

CenterCenter

EnvironmentEnvironment

Traffic & TransportTraffic & Transport

Urban DesignUrban Design

EastEast

NorthNorth


City Profile Discussion GroupsParticipants setting the

agenda:• SWOT Analysis of city

features using the Metaplan Methodology

• Voting on priorities


City Profile Document• Produced by the Planning Team on the basis of

discussion groups results and of research studies.

• Product: – Comprehensive document for wide

dissemination– About 1000 copies disseminated– Publication on the Municipal Web site


Participants formulate a desirable “future” for the city Workshops: 29 with about 200 participants in all


City Vision -Creative Visioning

City Vision -Creative Visioning

Generating ideas using De Bono’s “Thinking Hats”Method

• Formulation of scenarios for each Dimension• Formulation of an agreed “Workshop Vision”

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TEL AVIV YAFO

Formulation of One Vision for the CityTel-Aviv Yafo will continue to function as the economic and cultural capital of Israel and , in parallel, become an exemplary city for the quality of life provided to its residents.


City Vision – Strategic LinesStrategic line 1An economic & cultural center• A Metropolitan & National

Economic Centre• A Cultural Capital with cultural

facilities for all• A leading centre for higher

education & knowledge

• An attractive city for living• Equality of opportunities &

reduction of disparities• A leading excellent education

system for all• Strengthening community• Enhancing pluralism

Strategic Line 2A city for all its residents

• A Citizen-oriented Municipality• Residents participation• An Autonomous city• Metropolitan co-operation

Strategic Line 3Citizen-oriented governance

• Textural and High-risedevelopment combined

• A sensible land-use mix• Well-developed public space• Connection City -Sea• A multi-mode, efficient,

sustainable transport system• Improved environmental quality

Strategic Line 4An attractive urban environment


Strategic management of municipality working plans

Monitoring and Evaluation

Strategic LinesPolicy guidelines

Annual Objectives

Departments’ targets for each Municipal Objective

Detailed working Plans

City vision

Annualmunicipalworkingplan

MONITORING - THE GOALMONITORING - THE GOAL

Monitoring the state of the city according to the city’s vision

Is Tel Aviv Yafogoing closer to the

vision?

The City Vision: The Basis for the Monitoring ProcessThe City Vision: The Basis for the Monitoring ProcessLevel 1: Strategic LinesLevel 2: Conceptual FuturesLevel 3: Policies

• Changes in Tel Aviv Yafo.• Tel Aviv Yafo and Israel.• Tel Aviv Yafo and big cities in Israel.• Tel Aviv Yafo and the Metropolitan Area.• Tel Aviv Yafo and other cities in the world.

The Indicators as an Instrument for the following Comparisons: The Indicators as an Instrument for the following Comparisons:

Monitoring for Updating Policies MeansMonitoring for Updating Policies Means

City Profile

Monitoring and Controlling

City Vision: Policy Lines

Delivery Means

Second Cycle of Second Cycle of Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning

Updating Updating Delivery MeansDelivery Means

The ProcessThe Process

Proposal of Indicators

(Team)

Discussion of Indicators

(Representatives of municipal departments)

First Draft: 140 Indicators

Literature Survey

Final Draft: 50

Indicators

Operating the

Indicators

Periodical Measurement of Indicators

Literature Survey

Big Cities in the world, that have a vision and a strategic plan, develop monitoring systems using indicators Examples: London, Toronto, Seattle

What Is a Good Indicator?

• Simple• Relevant for Policy• Valid• Low costs and high

benefits• Understandable

How to Present Indicators?

Wichita, KansasWichita, Kansas Toronto, CanadaToronto, Canada

Criteria for Tel Aviv Yafo’sIndicators

• An overall urban view

• Transparency

• Information Availability

• Updating Process Simplicity

• Understanding Simplicity

• Comparison Ability

Indicators’ EvaluationIndicators’ Evaluation

In The End of The Process: A List of 50 Indicators

The Indicator Structure

• Strategic line• The subject of the Indicator – The linkage to the

vision• The name of the indicator• Description• Measurement and comparison• Description of the trends• The situation regarding the vision• Graphic presentation• Sources of data• The calculation method

Strategic Line 1: An Economic & Cultural Center: Indicators

• Concentration of Israelis and Internationasbanks.

• Local income• Employees at the financial and business

services• Culture events• Museums• The diverse of culture supply• Academic education at the south and east

areas of the city

Strategic Line 2: A City for all its Residents: Indicators

• New apartments• New apartments – Comparative to other

cities in the metropolitan• Apartments Upgrading• Satisfaction from the residence area• Population size• Children• Children and elderly persons• Housework and children• Children at age 0-3 in public day-cares

Strategic Line 2: A City for all its Residents: Indicators

• Dropout of teenagers from the education system

• Income• Apartments prices• Digital gap• Criminal youth• Children under the poverty line• Voting in the local elections• Voluntarily activity at the community• Community activity• Representation of population sectors at the

administration level of the municipality

Strategic Line 3: Citizen – Oriented Governanace: Indicators

• Satisfaction from services centers• Self income of the municipality• Giving authorities from government offices

to the municipality• Advancement of cooperation between

different cities

Strategic Line 4: An Attractive Urban Environment: Indicators

• High building in the area of the “white city”.• Open spaces• Satisfaction from open spaces at residence

areas• Street upgrading• Buildings repairing• Model of split rides• Rides in public transportation• Satisfaction from public transportation in

residence areas• Parking lots

Strategic Line 4: An Attractive Urban Environment: Indicators

• Municipality’s vehicles that are activated by alternatives fuels

• Air pollution• The extent of disturbance that cause by air

pollution• Satisfaction from the cleanliness in

residence areas• Garbage recycling

Strategic Line 2A city for all its residentsStrategic Line 2A city for all its residents

הייריעה לופיטב ןוניג יחטש ,עבור יפל ,2000 ,2005

7.2%

5.8%

10.5

%

8.7%

7.7%9.

2%

6.8%

11.2

%

10.5

%

9.2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

1-2 3-6 7-8 9 ךס-לכהעבורינוריע

סמ ךלכ

ש חט

ה זארו

%

20002005


18.6

6.2

15.0

8.5 11

.4

21.8

6.9

15.7

10.3 13

.0

0

5

10

15

20

25

1-2 3-6 7-8 9 ךס-לכהעבורינוריע

רנלשפ

מ"

20002005


1,53

5

750

1,03

7

648

1,95

0

875

1,10

5

784

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

1-2 3-6 7-8 9עבור

ודמנםי

20002005

Description:The indicator measures the extent of open public spaces, public parks, pedestrian streets, plazas, promenade, boulevards and plazas.

Description of trends: Between 2000-2005 the open public spaces has grown in 17%. The main growth was in quarters: 1, 2 and 9. In quarters 3-6 and 7-8 there was a moderate growth.

DescriptionSatisfaction of the residents from the extent of open spaces.Description of trends:Most of the city residents are satisfied of the extent of the open spaces.In the northern part of the city, residents are more satisfied.

רוזאב םיקוריה םיחטשה תומכמ ןוצר תועיבש ,2005

58%82%

50% 41%65%

42%18%

50% 59%35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

הס"כ ןופצ זכרמ םורד חרזמ

רוזא

הצורמ הצורמ אל

Strategic Line 4An Attractive Urban Environment

DescriptionThe extent of disturbance that air pollution causes

Description of trends:During the years there have been a fluctuation in the extent of disturbance that is caused by air pollution.

עירפמ ריוואה םוהיז םאה ?2005

55%35%

67% 62%45%

45%65%

33% 38%55%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

הס"כ ןופצ זכרמ םורד חרזמ

רוזאעירפמ עירפמ אל

עירפמ ריוואה םוהיז םאה ?2005-2002

47% 55% 50% 55%

53% 45% 50% 45%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005

עירפמ עירפמ אל


Closing coal operated power station


Description:Improving housing conditions

Description of trends:Increase in the number of approvals for improving housing conditions during 2006. Most of the improvements are in the central of Tel-Aviv

294142142201Total2016148South4836East

21387106157Center30101227North

2006200520042003

Annual Survey, Tel-Aviv Municipality

DescriptionModal Split to work of Tel-Aviv-Yafo residents.Description of trends:Sharp Decrease during the last decade in choosing the bus as a transportation to work. In the same time there is an increase in all other transportation means.


ירקיעה קוסיעה םוקמל תועיסנ לוציפלת יבשות לש- ביבא -ופי

42%

33%

11%

5% 4% 2% 3%

44%

23%

14%

5% 7% 5% 3%

45%

18%

14%

9%

6% 5% 3%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

תינוכמוא גהנכעסונכ

סובוטואירוביצ

לגרב ךלה תבכר,תינומ,העסהתנגרואמ

לע בכרעונפוא

לע בכרםיינפוא

דבע /דמלתיבהמ

1995 2004 2007

תרזחוממה תלוספה רועיש

5.0%

6.8%

8.6%

0

5

10

2003 2004 2005

Description of trends:Increase in the rate of home garbage recycling.

Strategic Line 4An Attractive Urban EnvironmentDescriptionThe rate of home garbage recycling

Tel-Aviv Municipality

Balance of preservation vs. development

presentationtelaviv.ppt - 2 - loughborough...

Documents