zachery holder's sahe...
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 1
Intervention Paper: Service-Learning
Adam Crawford, Zachery Holder, Katelynn James, and Riley O’Dell
Missouri State University
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 2
Intervention Paper: Service-Learning
The issue that is being addressed within this intervention revolves around the idea of
developing students as a “whole.” As student affairs professionals, it is vital that we ensure that
a student gains the most experience possible while in college and grows into an individual that is
well-rounded. One area that we found was lacking in our institution was the implementation of
service-learning into the academic setting. For this reason, we are requiring all students to take
part in some form of service-learning while in college. Service-learning provides students the
opportunity to apply what they have learned in the classroom to real-life situations, and reflect
upon that interaction. Students are able to get out of the classroom setting and get involved
within the community that the university is housed. Also, this new implementation would
provide a bridge between academic and student affairs at the university; something that has
constantly shown to be disconnected.
Service-learning is a teaching and learning strategy that integrates meaningful community
service with instruction and reflection to enrich the learning experience, teach civic
responsibility, and strengthen communities (Flecky, 2011). The relationship the school could
build within its community is one of great strength. While doing so, the student is also growing
as an individual and applying classroom material in a real-world situation.
Setting
As we begin to look at how we are going to utilize our intervention proposal, it is
important to look at the institutional type and where the institution is located. Our institution is a
small to medium sized university with roughly 10,000 enrolled students. This particular
institution is located in a lower income area of a larger city. We are looking to connect with
community partners for service-learning opportunities. These service opportunities are available
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 3
in all areas, including lower income areas. Within this developmental context, we are looking to
begin implementing the service-learning component into the academic side of the university.
Service-learning is currently available for all students as an extracurricular activity unassociated
with their courses. Our intention is to broaden the scope and incorporate the academic side of
the college/university for the students to gain hands-on experience with what they are learning in
the classroom.
Theoretical Analysis
Kolb’s theory of experiential learning underscores the importance of service-learning in
the classroom. Based on how one takes in information and makes that information meaningful,
an individual can experience learning in four different stages (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, &
Renn, 2010). Concrete experience involves hands-on learning, reflective observation consists of
watching and absorbing, abstract conceptualization describes the integration and analysis of
ideas, and active experimentation involves decision-making and problem solving. While
learners may prefer one of these steps to the other, Kolb emphasized that effective learning
occurs when learners move through each step in the cycle (Evans et al., 2010).
Kolb categorized these preferences into four main learning styles (Evans et al., 2010).
Converging individuals enjoy technical tasks and practical solutions. Diverging individuals
prefer using their imaginations and generating alternatives. Assimilating individuals are drawn
to logic and inductive reasoning. Accommodating individuals are action-oriented problem-
solvers. Kolb noted that these learning styles are not permanent, and each has their own
strengths and weaknesses. Further, “individuals need flexibility in style in order to have the
competencies needed to be contextually adaptive” (Evans et al., 2010, p. 141).
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 4
Service-learning is by nature more typical of the active experimentation and concrete
experience steps. Therefore, individuals who prefer reflective observation and abstract
conceptualization are not going to be as attracted to hands-on opportunities (Evans et al., 2010).
However, it is important to encourage the learning development of all students, regardless of
learning theory preference. Students need to be able to utilize all four skillsets of the learning
cycle in order to be effective and dynamic learners. Allowing opportunities for reflection,
observation, and analysis of students’ service-learning experiences will allow for students
uncomfortable with hands-on activities to ease into the experience (Evans et al., 2010).
Chickering’s identity development theory describes multiple aspects of campus life that
can have a positive or negative impact on students’ development (Evans et al., 2010).
Chickering enumerated seven key influences in an individual’s environment. A student’s
curriculum must be relevant and offer diverse perspectives, and teaching should include active
learning to maximize student development. It is also important for faculty and staff to
collaborate in order to provide effective student development programs and services that
facilitate the education of the whole student. Chickering also noted three admonitions that
contribute to powerful educational environments. One of these admonitions is the integration of
work and learning, in which Chickering contended that “collaborative relationships are needed
among business, the community, and institutions of higher education that will maximize the
developmental potential of work and volunteer experiences” (Evans et al., 2010, p. 71).
Service-learning serves as a mode of education that meets all of Chickering’s
aforementioned criteria. Service-learning involves students taking their knowledge and skills
gained in the classroom and applying them to the real world. This provides for a relevant and
diverse experience for the student. Service-learning and volunteer coordinator staff will need to
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 5
effectively partner and collaborate with the various colleges and professors in order to maximize
student development. Service-learning programs form a bridge between the university and the
community, and the collaborative environment contributes to both institutional and student
development (Evans et al., 2010).
Literature Review
Kathleen Fleck (2011) examined the foundations of service-learning with the aspect that
service-learning provided a structured opportunity for students, faculty, and community partners
to reflect on their interactions and activities. To be successful, a balance must exist between the
service and the learning in the outcomes resulting from the experiences within the partnership.
This must be done within individual course settings but also in the broader academic institutional
goals of community engagement (Flecky, 2011). There is a distinction between volunteering and
service-learning; the latter’s end means is to link the course objectives with structured
community interactions to meet the needs of a community. “Civic engagement and reflection
about service are essential elements of service-learning” (Flecky, 2011, p. 2). This introduces
the need for learning to help develop students as a whole as they understand themselves in
relationship to the rest of the world.
Service-learning presents an opportunity to challenge the teacher, learner, and community
partners to connect the service work that is being done within the community with the course
material. Through the approach of David Kolb, expanding the concepts of reflective thinking
presents the opportunity to process and adapt to the learning styles (Flecky, 2011). Reflection on
concrete experiences, thoughtful observation, abstract conceptualization and active
experimentation lead to inclusion of reflective activities prior to, during, and after service as part
of service-learning assignments (Flecky, 2011). The challenge is that few colleges and
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 6
universities require service-learning in the academic core while also facing the barrier of
students, faculty, and staff members’ perception on the rewards of service-learning (Eyler, Giles,
Stenson, & Gray, 2001).
The role of institutions and faculty in higher education is to support communities through
engagement (Flecky, 2011). This idea was supported by the increase in service-learning with the
Learn and Serve America Corps and Campus Compact. This was part of the establishment of the
National and Community Service Act of 1990, which was created with the goal to renew the
civic responsibility in the United States (Flecky, 2011). There is a need for more rigorous and
sophisticated research to examine longitudinal impacts of service-learning, which is something to
take into consideration for the application of the intervention.
“The primary mission of Service-Learning Programs is to engage students in experiences
that address human and community needs together with structured opportunities for reflection
intentionally designed to promote student learning and development” (Council, 2011, p. 4). This
provides us with the foundation to move service-learning forward as a partnership between
academic and student affairs. Examining the Council for the Advancement of Standards in
Higher Education (CAS) Standards for Service-Learning Programs, service-learning is defined
as follows: Service-learning is a form of experiential education in which students engage in
activities that address human and community needs together with structured opportunities
intentionally designed to promote student learning and development (Council, 2011). Both long-
term community enhancement and shorter-term service projects can make considerable
contributions to communities in both direct and indirect ways, providing the opportunity for
students to engage with others rather than working to gain something for themselves.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 7
The idea of community in terms of service-learning includes the local connection, but
also expands to include the state, national, and world community (Jacoby, 1996). This stresses
the need for individuals to be global citizens while also being active in their immediate
community. Service-learning address a variety of learning goals, including intellectual, civic,
ethical, moral, cross-cultural, and spiritual enrichment through active reflection and involvement
beyond the self (Eyler et al., 2001). These provide us with direct learning outcomes for our
intervention.
We can begin to look at the effects of service-learning to form tangible goals that our
intervention can expand on and achieve in our application. As a good foundation for our
intervention, the studies done on service-learning break down several benefits and positive
outcomes that we can utilize to guide our ways of intervention (Eyler et al., 2001). Outlining
positive personal, social, career, and institutional highlight areas for learning outcomes are key
factors in our intervention (Eyler et al., 2001). This provides us with a variety of goals that
address developing the student as a whole, bridging the gap between academic and student
affairs, and connecting everyone to their community.
The CAS Standards for service-learning (2011) highlighted required needs when
developing a program. The programs must assess relevant and desirable student learning and
development. Coordinators need to provide supporting evidence of how outcomes are being
met, and should utilize said evidence to create strategies for improvement of their programs and
services. To do this the programs must be intentionally designed, guided by theories and
knowledge of learning and development. The service-learning program must be integrated into
the life of the institution by being responsive to the needs of all individuals, in turn reflecting the
developmental and demographic profiles of the student population. The implementation should
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 8
use multiple formats, strategies, and contexts to address the needs at the particular institution
while being reviewed on a regular basis (Council, 2011).
Developmental Context
Our intuitional setting at a medium-sized school in a larger city will have many of our
students coming from smaller towns in surrounding areas and the state, similar to Missouri State
University. The surrounding community’s socioeconomic status falls between lower to lower-
middle class, which presents students with the opportunity to see challenges people face that the
students may have never had to experience. This will challenge the students with a new
perception of themselves in relation to the world around them and their sense of identity.
Some of these incoming students are not completely emotionally independent and have
not been challenged to develop intercultural and interpersonal tolerance (Evans et al., 2010).
Never being introduced to others who are different than them, students do not know how to
appreciate differences. Students are often transitioning from the typical American high school
setting of constant lectures and classroom discussion. Kolb identified the development process
of acquisition in adolescent students, when students are learning abilities and building cognitive
structure development (Evans et al., 2010). As students transition into the specialization during
college they will begin to shape their learning off of their social, education, and organizational
experiences. Entering the college setting will be the first time that students have a chance to
actively explore their learning style (Evans et al., 2010).
Students have different learning styles that the institution needs to integrate into the
curriculum, as Kolb demonstrated with his learning cycle (Evans et al., 2010). Student will be
looking for opportunities for engagement in their learning that best address the needs of their
learning style. However, there is the need to develop the student as a whole (Evans et al., 2010).
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 9
Description of Target Audience
For this intervention, our target audience will focus on freshman business students,
typically around the age of 18 or 19. There is no emphasis on male or female participants, but
rather the entire freshman business class as a whole. We want to include all races as well, even
though our university is predominantly white. These students would typically be placed in a
lecture setting for most of their classes. In relation to Chickering’s Theory of Identity
Development, our students would usually be placed in vectors three and four. During these
stages, students are beginning to develop a sense of independency and exploring their emotional
feelings. Some will even begin to appreciate differences among others and develop healthy
intimate relationships (Evans et al., 2010).
We chose to begin this research with business students because, according to Kolb’s
theory of experiential learning, these particular students typically prefer active experimentation
as well as concrete experience, making them potentially more willing to engage in service
learning than other students (Evans et al., 2010). Because students transition through vectors
while in college, we thought it would be best to target the ones that are at the lowest stages in
order to implement the idea of service-learning at a more receptive time in their lives.
Intervention Goals
In creating the following intervention through service-learning we had several goals in
mind: (a) developing the individuals socially and personally, (b) make individuals more engaged
in their academics, and (c) integrate service-learning into the campus as a whole. We have been
intentional in designing our interventions to work with the academic and the student affairs
departments to foster the growth of the student as a whole. Our intervention will also allow for
students to take an active stance in their community, making them more of a global citizen.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 10
Chickering’s vectors identify several areas for students to develop themselves socially
and personally which further help them understand and develop their own identity (Evans et al.,
2010). Service-learning researchers have identified positive effects on student personal
development through gaining a sense of personal efficacy, spiritual growth, and moral
development. Further, service-learning provides opportunities for students to improve their
interpersonal development, their ability to work well with others, leadership skills, and
communication abilities (Eyler et al., 2001). Kolb’s concept of reflective thinking in experiential
education (Flecky, 2011) lends to positive social outcomes, including reducing stereotypes and
facilitate cultural and racial understanding (Eyler et al., 2001) to secure interpersonal
relationships (Evans et al., 2010). During their experience, we want to encourage students to
develop a sense of social responsibility and citizenship skills while securing their commitment to
service (Eyler et al., 2001). If students have positive experiences through engaging in service-
learning, then it will encourage them to continue involvement.
Through learning outcomes we hope to improve the students’ academic success.
Through addressing the individuals’ learning styles and engaging them through the service-
learning program we can begin to build the students’ confidence and exploration of other means
to learn and develop (Evans et al., 2010). From there student will gain competence in applying
what they have learned to the real world. This can include improved problem analysis and
critically thinking skills (Eyler et al., 2001).
With the implementation of our intervention starting out on a small scale through the
Business Department, we hope to gain success proven with assessments and evaluation, which
can then be utilized to secure academically-tied service-learning across campus. The intervention
ultimately would further integrate the university community by connecting academic affairs,
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 11
student affairs, and the student body. The positive effects of service-learning will translate into
improving students’ satisfaction with the college and increasing the amount of students
graduating (Eyler et al., 2001).
Intervention
As we begin to look at how to incorporate service-learning into an academic setting, there
is a progression that needs to occur to establish a good working relationship between service-
learning and academic departments. This progression will occur with the development of a
Service-Learning Interim Coordinator. The coordinator’s responsibilities will include (a) creation
of a database to host all service-learning submissions and process service transcripts to be
utilized as an additional piece to a student’s graduation success and job employment portfolio,
(b) presentation or orientation of service-learning opportunities in student introduction classes,
(c) incorporation of a service-learning component into the Business Department coinciding with
the Service-Learning Coordinator for a four year study and research, (d) design and analyze
surveys and reflection journals to assess the progress of the service-learning component within
the academic setting, and finally (e) incorporating a service-learning component into all
academic departments within four years’ time upon completion of the survey’s and study.
Utilizing this progression will help develop a connection with the student affairs division and the
academic affairs division on our campus.
Service Learning Interim Coordinator
To begin the progression, we believe that developing a position of a Service-Learning
Coordinator would be beneficial for the job responsibilities that will be required for the position.
Due to the size of our established campus, the funds to hire an individual for a four year interim
position are limited; therefore, we have decided that we will ask an employee within the Office
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 12
of Student Development and Activities to take on the additional responsibilities of the Service-
Learning Interim Coordinator with a respective pay increase.
The position responsibilities of the Service-Learning Coordinator will be to (a) develop
the service-learning program requirements for our pilot focus, the Business Department; (b)
develop service-learning orientations/presentations for the university student introduction class,
along with lecture guidelines, readings, and resources for additional support; and (c) recruit
faculty and academic departments to buy into service-learning and create relationships for future
incentives incorporating service-learning within the classroom (Northeastern, 2012).
Additionally, a database will need to be constructed by the Interim Coordinator to host all
submissions for service-learning. The job of the Interim Coordinator for Service-Learning is an
important position to have when looking to better the use of service-learning, and provides an
individual the ability to connect with the community.
Database
Next in the progression is the development of a database for service-learning submission.
The creation of this database will provide a few different services for the students and the
Service-Learning Interim Coordinator. The idea of the database is that it will be a common
online place for students to go to and find service-learning opportunities outside of the
classroom. This database will also be used within the classroom setting for students to learn
about what service-learning will be incorporated, and also for individual students outside of the
classroom wanting to become more involved with the surrounding community. The service-
learning database will be housed on the university website, within the service-learning site.
When developing the database, it should be interactive for the faculty, staff, and students
utilizing the site, and should be easily accessible.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 13
An outsourcing group to run this type of information would be Campus Labs
(Collegiatelink, 2012). Campus Labs is a well-known company that supports working
relationships with higher education institutions in accreditation assistance, assessment and
evaluation, student involvement, early alert notification experiences, and course evaluations.
Collegiate Link is a site that can be utilized be an institution to help expand on the student
experience. This site is manly used for student organizations, but depending on the need for the
university, this site can be mainly used for service-learning at the university administrators’
discretion. It is important to keep in mind that this site will require some financial backing, but
discussion with the Student Government Association and university administration could provide
insight to the benefits, student backing, and financial support needed to acquire this online
database.
Collegiate Link is a useful site that can house the service-learning database that we are
looking to incorporate. Instead of utilizing the site for student involvement, the university could
use this site as hub for all the service-learning opportunities for students, along with the
community partners willing to work with the institution. The database is designed with a home
page that provides news updates, therefore any announcements that the Service-Learning Interim
Coordinator would want to post can be seen on the home page of the site. There is also a flyer
board on the homepage where service-learning events and trips could be posted, and students can
click on those events and/or trips to take them to the direct link within the database, or add it to
his/her school calendar via e-mail. The flyer board is beneficial as students can see what events
are coming up, and it provides direct information to the event. Upon moving to the next tab of
involvement, there is a directory in alphabetical order for all the service-learning opportunities
and community partners willing to work with students, academic departments and classes, along
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 14
with student organizations. The service-learning opportunities and community partners can also
be searched by typing in the name, or searching by category. The “search by category” option
can provide easy access to all opportunities, and a student would be able to search by what type
of service most interests him or her (CampusLINK, 2012).
Along with the aforementioned options above, there are more detailed options for this
particular site of Collegiate Link. Each service-learning opportunity and community partner
would have its own personal page within the site. This personal site provides various functions
to be used for that individual project, trip, or community partner. The categories range from a
home page, news updates, a profile to provide additional information about the trip, project, or
community partner, an events tab to keep up-to-date with what will be coming next, a rosters
page for individuals who would like to participate may ask to join that particular trip, project or
community to gain more information when e-mails and notifications are sent out from the server,
a photo gallery to document what is occurring on the outings, a documents tab to post any
necessary documents that are needed to be accessed by participating individuals, and finally a
forms tab for individuals to download and submit any necessary forms needed for that particular
trip, project, or community partner (CampusLINK, 2012). The Service-Learning Interim
Coordinator could create a specific link within the involvement piece of the site to be named
“Service-Learning Hub,” and within this piece utilize the site as outlined above. Particularly in
the forms tab of the Service-Learning Hub, there could be a document available for submission
of any hours in relation to a service-learning trip, or project.
Within the appendices, you will find a hard copy of the submission document that we are
utilizing for our students to submit online for tracking purposes (see Appendix A for an
example). Collegiate Link provides tracking options within this site, and all information can be
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 15
exported into excel documents for easier use and sharing purposes. Along with the tracking
option, a printable transcript is available for students upon request. This transcript will provide
documentation of hours completed in service-learning and brief descriptions of the service-
learning opportunity. Students would have the ability to edit any information on the transcript
before requesting a copy from the Service-Learning Interim Coordinator. The Interim
Coordinator would then be responsible for cross-referencing with the Collegiate Link documents
to finalize the student’s transcript before printing on university approved paper and sealing it
with the university seal and administrator signature. We believe that acquiring a database of this
stature will provide organization and professionalism to service-learning as we work to support it
throughout campus, and throughout the surrounding community.
Academic Integration
Once development of the internal portions of the service-learning database is complete,
we then move forward and coordinate with the Business Department about including a service-
learning component into at least one 100-, 200-, and 300-level class. Thirty hours of service will
be required throughout the three courses, ten hours per each class. We believe that incorporating
ten hours of service to each class will encourage students to participate in other service activities
throughout his/her collegiate experience. The freshman business students will comprise the
participants for a four-year study on the service-learning program. Pre-test and post-test surveys
will be given to all students in the participating study. Doing a four year study will be beneficial
to learn whether incorporating service-learning will be helpful to all students, and if so, then the
next step will be taken to include other academic areas.
As we begin the test process of service-learning in an academic setting, the Business
Department instructors willing to test out a service-learning component in their classes will be
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 16
asked to work with the Service-Learning Interim Coordinator on what community partners
would be best to work with in relation to the material being taught. Once a community partner is
established for each class, the instructors can then develop their syllabi, incorporating the ten
hours of service for the class. Additional lecture guidelines to prepare the students for service-
learning in the community, readings, and resources will be provided to the instructors who are
opting to include service-learning in their curriculum.
Reflections & Surveys
Additionally in the curriculum, instructors will be encouraged to include assignments of
reflection journals of the student’s service-learning experience, along with surveys to be taken at
the beginning and end of the semester. The encouragement for the reflection journals is to help
the students process what he/she has experienced during their hands-on experience, and provide
a way to track personal progress, along with academic progress within the class. The journals
can be collected by the instructors and taken for a grade at the end of the semester to provide
incentive to do the journals. The reflection piece of service-learning is important as students
learn more about themselves, as individuals, along with what he/she is learning in the academic
setting.
Surveys will be given at the beginning and ending of the semester to learn what the
students understand about service-learning from the beginning, and how he/she has progressed
through the four months of classes and hands-on experience. Surveys are a useful way to gage
the learning experience and the progression of the students. Throughout the four years with
permission of the participating students, it would be beneficial to have a resource library where
all reflections and anonymous surveys could be accessed by faculty, staff, and students to see
how the service-learning component is beneficial to student development (Religious, 2012).
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 17
Utilizing surveys and reflection journals will help provide the Service-Learning Interim
Coordinator with information about how to further proceed in the future, and what are best
practices when working with academic departments.
Analysis & Expansion
Once the four year study has been completed, and the information has been complied, we
will look to see how service-learning will benefit all students at the institution, within academic
settings or by individual motivation. If a positive reaction is gathered by both students and the
Business Department, it will be easier to work with other academic departments and encourage
the use of a service-learning component within the classroom. Positive intake is vital to
successfully promote service-learning. In hopes that all feedback and research is positive, the
possibility of expanding the service-learning experience into a student affairs office would be
ideal. This would be an expansion that would require additional research and funding, but
expanding service-learning in the academic field would provide opportunities for students in all
areas. It would be encouraged that the service-learning component begins with the incoming
freshmen class that following year to jump start the students’ experience with a positive service-
learning environment.
Rationale
All of the steps in our intervention were designed with student development theory and
best practices in mind. Our decision to ground service-learning in the academic experience
while hiring a Service-learning Coordinator to help manage the program was based on several of
Chickering’s key influences. A curriculum is most beneficial to student development when it is
relevant, reflective, and diverse (Evans et al., 2010). Teaching methods that include active
learning and address individual learning differences are also important to student development.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 18
The collaboration between faculty and student affairs professionals on programs such as service-
learning can also be a powerful factor in student development. By integrating service-learning
into the classroom, the students will be better able to connect their learning experiences to the
real world. The bridge created between academic and student affairs will better serve the
development of the whole student (Evans et al., 2010).
We felt that utilizing a service-learning database and offering service transcripts would be
effective strategies for these developmental programs. They provide both ease and incentive for
students to not only participate, but to value and utilize their experiences in the future. We
limited the service-learning requirement to one department at the university so it can serve as a
pilot program. This will allow us to focus on the effectiveness of the program before expanding
to a larger student population.
Throughout the design of the service-learning program, we felt it was important to
address students’ varied learning styles. Service-learning provides a great opportunity to
complete the cycle of Kolb’s experiential learning if designed with proper reflection and analysis
(Cone & Harris, 1996). Therefore, we made sure to develop our service-learning program in a
way that would help students of all learning styles. Our program orientation will include written
instructions, relevant readings, and lectures to ease diverging and assimilating students into a
learning experience they may not find as comfortable. The service-learning experience itself
provides active experimentation and concrete experience. The cycle continues with reflections
in the form of journals, essays, and presentations as part of the classroom curriculum.
Reflections are vital for connecting the community service to educational content (Bringle &
Hatcher, 1999). This cyclical nature will ensure that all students’ learning styles are being
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 19
addressed, while helping students to become more adaptive learners and practitioners (Cone &
Harris, 1996; Evans et al., 2010).
We will judge the success of our program using assessment tools to evaluate learning
outcomes. We will also assess the students’ ability to adapt to various learning situations, based
on Kolb’s experiential learning theory (Evans et al., 2010). We will discuss the details of our
assessment techniques later. Assuming the program is a success, we then plan to expand the
service-learning program to a service-learning center, with more than one staff position. We did
not want to expand before this point in the interest of responsible resource management. Once
the program is integrated into all academic programs, the demand for more staff and resources
will justify our expansion.
Evaluation Plan
We will assess our program using pretests and posttests to evaluate student development.
These tests will be in the form of surveys designed to quantify students’ progress toward our
identified learning outcomes (see Appendix B for survey examples). These outcomes include
personal efficacy, exposure to diversity, moral development, and greater connection to the
community. Some questions will also address students’ perceptions of the program’s relevancy,
helpfulness, and effectiveness. The surveys will be administered to students at the beginning and
end of each semester. The surveys will feature a Likert scale in which students can agree or
disagree to the statements or questions provided. Other researchers have used this method to
evaluate service-learning programs (Werder & Strand, 2011). Student reflection assignments,
such as journals and essays, will also be used to evaluate the program’s effectiveness at student
development.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 20
Faculty and community partners will also be administered surveys for their participation.
These surveys serve as a form of quality control as we ensure that the faculty and community
organizations are satisfied with the service-learning program. Questions will address perceived
educational benefits, usefulness of the volunteers, and ease of service (see Appendix C and D for
survey examples).
Students will also complete the Adaptive Style Inventory at the beginning and end of the
service-learning program. We will use this assessment to “assess an individual’s ability to adapt
to different learning situations” (Evans et al., 2010, p. 146). We chose this assessment because
of its ability to assess learning flexibility, which is a learning outcome goal in our program. Our
hope is that we will see that students have become more competent in all four stages of Kolb’s
learning cycle model following the service-learning program.
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 21
References
Bringle, R. & Hatcher, J. (1999). Reflection in service-learning: Making meaning of experience.
Educational Horizons, 2, 179-185.
CampusLINK database [software] (2012). Retrieved from http://missouristate.edu
CollegiateLink (2012). Campuslabs. Retrieved from
http://www.campuslabs.com/products/collegiatelink/
Cone, D. & Harris, S. (1996). Service-learning practice: Developing a theoretical framework.
Michigan Journal of Community Service-learning, 3, 31-43. Retrieved from
http://ginsberg.umich.edu/mjcsl/
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (2011). Service-Learning
Programs. (2011). Retrieved from www.cas.edu/getpdf.cfm?PDF=E86EC8E7-9B94-
5F5C-9AD22B4FEF375B64
Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2010). Student
development in college (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eyler, J. S., Giles, D. E., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about
the effects of service-learning on college, students, faculty institutions, and communities,
1993-2000. (3rd ed.). Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
Flecky, K.(2011). Foundations of service-learning. In Flecky, K., & Gitlow, L. (Eds.), Service-
learning in occupational therapy education: philosophy and practice. (pp. 2-18).
Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Gateway Technical College, Service Learning Center (2012). Instructor survey. Retrieved from
http://www.gtc.edu/service-learning
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 22
Jacoby, B. (1996), Service-Learning in Higher Education: concepts and practices. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
National Service-Learning Clearinghouse (2012a). Community partner survey. Great Cities
Great Service. Retrieved from
http://www.servicelearning.org/sample_form_template/community-partner-survey
National Service-Learning Clearinghouse (2012b). Student post-service survey. Center for
Learning Through Service. Retrieved from
http://www.servicelearning.org/sample_form_template/student-post-service-survey
Northeastern University (2012). Associate director & service-learning coordinator. HigherEd
Jobs. Retrieved from http://www.higheredjobs.com/
Religious Lives of Ozarks Women Collection (2012). Missouri State University. Retrieved from
http://library.missouristate.edu/archives/speccoll/m040.htm
Werder, K. P. & Strand, K. (2011). Measuring student outcomes: An assessment of service-
learning in the public relations campaigns course. Public Relations Review, 37, 478-484.
doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.0
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 23
Appendix A
Service-Learning Tracking Form
Service-Learning Tracking FormThe Service-Learning Tracking form is used for all students who are registered and taking any academic classes with a service-learning component. This form is required to be completed for data collection purposes and individual tracking for future service-learning transcript requests.
Form Requirements:
You can submit your volunteer/service hours for your individual class service hours with this form.
All hours must be recorded within 7 days of the service to be counted towards class participation
and hours required for the class service-learning component.
Questions can be directed to:Service-Learning Interim Coordinator, Office of Student Development and Activities
Personal Information
First Name: (required)
_____________________________________________
Last Name: (required)
_____________________________________________
Institution Email Address (required)
_____________________________________________ddl3374181
Service InformationNumber of Hours Completed_____________________________________________
Dates of Hours Completed (e.g. 12/7/2011, 12/9/2011 or 12/7/2011 - 12/9/2011)
_____________________________________________
If for a service-learning course, please indicate which academic course. (Please include Class, Section, and Instructor)
_____________________________________________rb3376138
Name of Agency Served (required)
_____________________________________________
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 24
Contact Person (Name) (required)
_____________________________________________
Contact Phone Number (xxx-xxx-xxxx)
_____________________________________________
Contact Email Address
_____________________________________________
Brief Description of Service (required)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________rb3374234
Adapted from Missouri State University’s Individual Service Report Form, 2012
Citation: (CampusLINK, 2012)
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 25
Appendix B
Student Survey Example
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGESTUDENT SERVICE-LEARNING SURVEY
Post-Service
This survey is designed to measure general attitudes and perceptions of service-learning students. This information will be used to improve the college’s service-learning program.
Course Number or Name _____________________
Instructor’s Name____________________
Today’s Date:______________________
Approximate Grade Point Average: _____
Male _____ Female _____
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 26
Please respond as honestly as possible, relying on your current beliefs or attitudes. Indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the appropriate choice.
Strongly Agree
Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Not
Applicable
1. The service aspect of this course helped me to see how the subject matter I learned can be used in everyday life.
4 3 2 1
2. I will probably continue to volunteer in the community after this course ends.
4 3 2 1
3. As a result of my service-learning experience, I have improved my critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
4 3 2 1
4. As a result of my service-learning experience, I think I have learned more in this class than I would had I not participated in a service experience.
4 3 2 1
5. As a result of my service-learning experience, I have an increased level of awareness of cultural differences and attitudes toward helping others.
4 3 2 1
6. As a result of my service-learning experience, I have improved my communication skills.
4 3 2 1
7. As a result of my service-learning experience, I have an improved sense of civic and social responsibility.
4 3 2 1
8. I plan to enroll in more courses that offer service-learning.
4 3 2 1
5. Was your service-learning assignment a requirement or an option? _______________________
6. Was this your first service-learning experience in higher education? ______________________
7. Where did you do your service-learning assignment? ____________________________
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 27
8. What did you like or dislike about your agency or site?
9. Would you consider doing service-learning in another class? Why? Why not?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________
10. Please recommend any suggestions on how this program or the service-learning option in this class might be
improved for students in the future.
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Optional:
Your name: _______________________
Email address: _____________________
Citation: (National, 2012b)
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 28
Appendix C
Faculty Survey
Instructor Survey Name: ________________________________Date: _________________________________Please answer the following questions as completely as possible about the current course you are teaching that involves Service Learning.
COURSE DEMOGRAPHICS
1.
What campus are you teaching this course? ___________________________________________
2. What is the name of the course? ____________________________________________________
3. In what department, division, or major is your course listed? _____________________________
4. What social issue or community need do you anticipate your class deciding to target? (check all that apply)
Hunger Health & Wellness Children and Youth Programs Homelessness Mental Health Neighborhood DevelopmentOther (please describe): __________________________________________________________
5. How many students are enrolled in your course? _________________ students6. How many hours a week does your course meet? _________________hours/week7. How many weeks does your course meet? ____________________weeks8. On average, how many hours per week do you expect your students to spend doing work
outside of formal class time to do well in this course, EXCLUDING the required non-profit service learning/volunteering? _____________________hours/week
9. What percentage of in-class time do you expect to focus on service learning? Less than 25% Between 25% and 49% Between 50% and 75% More than 75%
COURSE INFORMATION
10.
When you developed the service learning component of this course, did you: Look at other syllabi Speak with instructors who had taught similar courses Attend training Speak with Campus Compact representatives Other____________________________________
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 29
11. To what extent did your course contain:Not at all Rarely Sometimes Often
Group Work Lecture Discussion Outside Speakers Independent Work Student Presentation
12.
12. Have you taught this course before without the service learning component? Yes (Move to question 13) No (Move to question 14)
13. If you have taught this course before WITHOUT a service learning component, in which version did you observe the following in students? (If this is the first version of this course, please continue onto the next question).
Course taughtWITHservice learning
Course taught WITHOUTservice learning
No difference between courses
Students were more personally invested
Students spent more time working on the course outside of class
Students held each other more accountable
Students worked harder Students developed more as leaders
Students understood the course content better
14.
14. What were the critical skills developed by the students in this course? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
15. To what extent were the following components used to evaluate student performance in your course?
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 30
Not at all
Rarely Sometimes
Often
Research Paper Participation Presentation Peer Review Journal/Reflection Community Partner Feedback
16.
16. If you were to teach this course again, what would you change? ___________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
17. What were the benefits, if any of using a team approach (development officer, campus liaison, and you)? ______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
18. What were the drawbacks? ________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INSTRUCTOR DEMOGRAPHS
19. What is your title? Professor Assistant/Associate Professor Adjunct Professor Instructor
20. How long have you been teaching at the college level? _______________ years
21. How long have you been teaching at Gateway Technical College? ___________years
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 31
Citation: (Gateway, 2012)
Appendix D
Community Partners Survey
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 32
INTERVENTION: SERVICE-LEARNING 33
Citation: (National, 2012a)