x-rays and materials a vision of the future joachim stöhr stanford synchrotron radiation laboratory
TRANSCRIPT
X-Rays and Materials
A Vision of the Future
Joachim Stöhr Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
In $$$$$'sInformation technology: 800 BillionChemical Industry: 400 BillionSemiconductors: 80 BillionMagnetic materials: 25 Billion
Pharmaceutical industry: 220 BillionBiotech Industry: 30 Billion
The big $$$ Picture: US Gross Domestic Product: $10 Trillion
Modern materials are complex – studies require sophisticated techniques
Present: Size > 0.1 m, Speed > 1 nsecFuture: Size < 0.1 m, Speed < 1 nsec Ultrafast Nanoscale Dynamics
Growth of X-Ray Brightness and Magnetic Storage Density
Why X-Rays? - Chemical Sensitivity
Core level shifts
and
Molecular orbital shifts
Stöhr et.al
Polarization Dependence
290295 300 305
NormalIncidence
C
C
C
FF
FF
FF
E
GrazingIncidence
C
C
C
FF
FF
FF
E
Nor
mal
ized
Int
ensi
ty (
a.u
.)
Photon Energy (eV)
F8 22°C
C F
C F
C O
C C
Magnetic Spectroscopy and Microscopy
Real Space Imaging
1895 1993
X-Rays have come a long way……
The Future: PEEM3
PEEM2 PEEM3 nm nm
Resolution 50 nm < 5 nm (1% transmission)
Transmission 1% 50%@ 50 nm Resolution
Relativephoton flux 1 20
RelativeFlux density 1 >1000
Source / bend EPU (arbitrary)Polarization
PEEM2 on BL 7.3.1.1
Photoemission Electron Microscopy – PEEM at ALS
4.0.3 PEEM3 Microscope
- total electron yield imaging
- no LEEM mode (as in SMART)
Resolution vs Transmission
868 870 872 874
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
TE
Y (
a.u.
)
Photon Energy(eV)
777 778 779
0
4
8
TE
Y (
a.u.
)
Photon Energy (eV)
m
[010]
NiOXMLD
CoXMCD
Spectromicroscopy of Ferromagnets and Antiferromagnets
AFM domainstructure at surface of NiOsubstrate
FM domainstructure inthin Co film onNiO substrate
H. Ohldag, A. Scholl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(13), 2878 (2001).
Non Resonant X-Ray Scattering
Relative Intensity: (h/ mc2)2Relative Intensity: 1
h ~ 10 keV, mc2 = 500 keV
Kortright and Kim, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)
Fe metal – L edge
Fe
Resonant Magnetic Soft X-ray Scattering
M
e
e’
I exp( i qrn ) fnn 2
fne' eFn(0) i (e'e)Mn Fn
(1)charge magnetic -XMCD
= f1 + i f2
Note: at resonance f1 = 0
where Fn(i) are complex
Kortright and Kim, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)
Small Angle ScatteringCoherence length larger than domains,but smaller than illuminated area
SpeckleCoherence lengthlarger than illuminated area
Incoherent vs. Coherent X-Ray Scattering
log (intensity)40
-20
-40
0
20
-40 -20 0 20 40
-40
-20
0
20
40
scattering vector q (m-1)
scat
teri
ng v
ecto
r q
(m
-1)
log (intensity)40
-20
-40
0
20
-40 -20 0 20 40
-40
-20
0
20
40
scattering vector q (m-1)
scat
teri
ng v
ecto
r q
(m
-1)
informationabout
domainstatistics
trueinformation
about domainstructure
Present Pump/Probe Experiments
330 ns
50 ps
X-Raypulse
Laserpulse• Pump:
Laser
• Probe: delayed photon pulse
• Vary the delay between laser and x-ray pulses
+V
Laser focus
Switch Injection device
-V
+V
Laser focus
Switch Injection device
-V
Can also produce current pulses
Storage rings
Single pass linear colliders
Development of High Energy Physics and X-Ray Sources
HEP SR
Single pass linacs
Free electron lasers (FELs)Energy recovery linacs (ERLs)
-- From storage rings to linacs --
X-Ray Brightness and Pulse Length
• X-ray brightness determined by electron beam brightness
• X-ray pulse length determined by electron beam pulse length
Storage ring Emittance and bunch length are result of an equilibriumtypical numbers: 2 nm rad, 50 psec
Linac beam can be much brighter and pulses much shorter– at cost of “jitter”
Linac Normalized emittance is determined by gun Bunch length is determined by compressiontypical numbers: 0.03 nm rad, 100 fs
• SASE gives 106 intensity gain over spontaneous emission
• FELs can produce ultrafast pulses (of order 100 fs)
LLINACINAC C COHERENTOHERENT L LIGHTIGHT S SOURCEOURCE2 Km
0 Km
3 Km
Based on single pass free electron laser (FEL)
Uses high energy linac (~15 GeV) to provide compressed electron beam to long undulator(s) (~120 m) – 200 fs or less
Based on SASE physics to produce 800-8,000eV (up to 24KeV in 3rd harmonic) radiation - 1012 photon/shot
Analogous in concept to XFEL of TESLA project at DESY
Planned operation starting in 2008
Concepts of the LCLS:
From Molecules to Solids: Ultra-fast Phenomena
Chemistry& Biology:
H2OOH + H
about 10 fs
time depends on mass and size
Condensed Matter: typical vibrational
period is 100 fsSpeed of sound is 100 fs / Å- coherent acoustic phonons
H
S
90o spin precession time 10 ps for H = 1 Tesla
Fundamental atomic and molecular reaction and dissociation processes
Fundamental motions of charge and spin on the nanoscale (atomic – 100nm size)
Note in quantum regime: 1 eV corresponds to fluctuation time of 4 fs
transversely coherent X-ray pulse from LCLS
sample
X-Ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy Using Split Pulse
In picoseconds - nanoseconds range:Uses high peak brilliance
sum of speckle patternsfrom prompt and delayed pulses
recorded on CCD
I(Q,t)
splitter
variable delay t
t
Con
tras
t
Analyze contrastas f(delay time)
10 ps 3mm
TransmissionX-ray
Microscope
Reconstructionfrom
Speckle Intensities
5 m(different areas)
Single shot Imaging by Coherent X-Ray Diffraction
Phase problem can be solved by “oversampling” speckle image
S. Eisebitt, M. Lörgen, J. Lüning, J. Stöhr, W. Eberhardt, E. Fullerton (unpublished)
Mag
neti
zati
on
Temperature t = (T-Tc) / Tc
Tc
Spin Block Fluctuations around Critical Temperature
T < Tc T Tc T > Tc
Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules
Proposed method: diffuse x-ray scattering from single protein moleculeNeutze, Wouts, van der Spoel, Weckert, Hajdu Nature 406, 752-757 (2000)
Implementation limited by radiation damage:
In crystals limit to damage tolerance is about 200 x-ray photons/Å2 For single protein molecules need about 1010 x-ray photons/Å2 (for 2Å resolution)
LysozymeCalculated scattering pattern from lysozyme molecule
Conventional method: x-ray diffraction from crystal
X-Ray Diffraction from a Single Molecules
Just before LCLS pulse
Just after pulse
A bright idea:
Use ultra-short, intense x-ray pulse to produce scattering pattern before molecule explodes
Long after pulse
The million dollar question: Can we produce an x-ray pulse that is short enough? intense enough?
X-FELs will deliver:
unprecedented brightness and femtosecond pulses
Understanding of laser physics and technology well founded
FELs promise to be extraordinary scientific tools
Applications in many areas:
chemistry, biology, plasma physics, atomic physics,
condensed matter physics
Summary
The End