x-ray mission cross calibration - nasa · 2001-12-10 · gis3 0.91 0.97 ----pspc 0.85* 0.97 ----*...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Comparison of XMM-Newton EPIC, Chandra ACIS-S3, ASCA SIS and GIS,and ROSAT PSPC results for G21.5-0.9, 1ES0102-72.3, and MS1054.4-0321
A “Man on the street” view of the current status of the cross calibration.à Publicly available software (SAS 5.2, mostly CIAO 2.1) and
current calibration data bases (well almost)à Will not address “Truth” but “Beauty” is a relative concept
Steve Snowden – NASA/GSFC/USRA
Paul Plucinsky, Dick Edgar – CXC Dave Lumb – ESTECRichard Saxton, Steve Sembay – U. LeicesterRichard Mushotzky – GSFC Ian George, Kip Kuntz – UMBC
X-ray Mission Cross Calibration
LHEAESTEC:NVS – WA2 XMM Instrument Calibration - 1
![Page 2: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Calibration and software as current in the last month or twoà The calibration and software are moving quantities which are
improving with time, i.e., in the last 8 months these resultshave changed for the better.
Fudge for the ACIS-S3 fits: a carbon Kalpha edge of optical depth1.0 has been added which improves the fits
There are sensitivities to the energy range, background selection,spectral model, which data are being fit, what parameters arebeing fit simultaneously, etc.
ACIS results are for the S3 CCD only.
Caveats
ESTEC:NVS - 2
![Page 3: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
G21.5-0.9Crab-like SNR with an extended
X-ray haloIn order to compare XMM and
Chandra results with thosefrom ASCA, full remnantextracted (XMM/Chandra 165”radius, ASCA 240” radius)
Power-law spectrum dominatesPN, MOS1, MOS2, ACIS-S3,
SIS0, SIS1, GIS2, GIS3
ESTEC:NVS - 3
![Page 4: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
G21.5-0.9 Spectra - All
ESTEC:NVS - 4
![Page 5: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
G21.5-0.9 Confidence Contours - All
ESTEC:NVS - 5
![Page 6: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
G21.5-0.9 Spectra – EPIC/ACIS
ESTEC:NVS - 6
![Page 7: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
G21.5-0.9 Confidence Contours – EPIC/ACIS
ESTEC:NVS - 7
![Page 8: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1ES0102-72.3SMC SNRVery line richMOS1, MOS2, ACIS-S3,
SIS0, SIS1, GIS2, GIS3,PSPC, RGS1, RGS2
Spectrum: 2 absorbedAPEC thermal spectrawith variable abundances
Terrible fit in terms of χ2ν
but good enough forfitted flux comparison
ESTEC:NVS - 8
![Page 9: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1ES0102-72.3 Spectra - All
ESTEC:NVS - 9
![Page 10: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1ES0102-72.3 Spectra – MOS/ACIS
ESTEC:NVS - 10
![Page 11: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MS1054.4-0321
High redshift clusterLow absorptionMOS1, MOS2, ACIS-S3One absorbed high-
temperature spectrumRelatively poor statisticsXMM proprietary data
courtesy of MikeWatson
ESTEC:NVS - 11
![Page 12: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MS1054.4-0321 Spectra
ESTEC:NVS - 12
![Page 13: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MS1054.4-0321 Confidence Contours
ESTEC:NVS - 13
![Page 14: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Relative Flux SummarySimultaneous Fits, normalized to the MOS1, MOS2, ACIS-S3 average
G21.5-0.9 1ES0102-72.3 MS1054.4-0321 2 – 10 keV 0.5 - 2.0 keV 1 – 5 keV
PN 0.95 ---- 0.94MOS1 1.01 1.04 0.98MOS2 1.01 1.02 0.99ACIS-S3 0.98 0.95 1.02SIS0 0.91 1.06 ----SIS1 0.96 0.99 ----GIS2 0.88 0.91 ----GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----
* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV bandESTEC:NVS - 14
![Page 15: X-ray Mission Cross Calibration - NASA · 2001-12-10 · GIS3 0.91 0.97 ----PSPC 0.85* 0.97 ----* Flux compared over the 0.5-2.5 keV band ESTEC:NVS - 14. Conclusions Pretty good,](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042913/5f4a4fc8da3337363e2360aa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ConclusionsPretty good, but work left to do.à EPIC/ACIS flux calibration good to +/- 5%à Power law indices good to < 0.1à EPIC MOS/PN inconsistency must be resolvedà ACIS-S3 low energy response must be fixed
à And, of course, more comparisons need to be doneDifferent spectraEPIC vs ACIS-I
ESTEC:NVS - 15