www.ufop.de union for the promotion of oil and protein plants biodiesel in germany/europe spzo-28th...
TRANSCRIPT
www.ufop.de
Union for the Promotion of Oil and Protein Plants
Biodiesel in Germany/Europe
SPZO-28th international conference HLUK meeting
Hluk/Moravia/CZ November 24-25, 2011
Dr. Norbert Heim, UFOP/Berlin
www.ufop.de
Regulatory Framework for Biofuels
• EU RED (EU Directive 2009/28/EC);- 10% target for energy from renewable sources in the transport sector by
2020- Sustainability requirements for biofuels
• Fuel Quality Directive (EU Directive 2009/30/EG);- Binding GHG mitigation target of 6% for fuels until 2020
- Target could be achieved by the use of biofuels
• Germany: Federal Emission Control Act (BImschG)- Definition of a biofuel quota (6,25% energetic until 2014)
- From 2015 this quota will be replaced by a GHG-mitigation target of 7% until 2020
2
www.ufop.de
F.O.Licht
EU increases in 2010 biofuel quotas
5.25
3.003.40
3.753.00 3.25
6.257.00
5.83 5.755.004.60
6.38
3.504.003.50
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
% c
alo
rifi
c
2009 2010
Source: F.O.Licht
www.ufop.de
F.O.Licht
EU biodiesel balance
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
To
nn
es
Production Imports Disapp.
Source: F. O. Licht
www.ufop.de
www.ufop.de
Prognosis Biodiesel 2020 D & EU
D 2010 D 2015 D 2020 EU 2020
Target cal. % 6% (7%) (10%) 10%
GHG saving Quota (2%) 3% 7% 6%
Diesel Consumption Mln t 32 34 33 205
Biodiesel Demand Mln t 2,3 2,4 2,8 17
HVO/BtL Demand Mln t 0,3 1,2 6
Ø GHG saving Biodiesel/HVO/BtL 40% 50% 65% 65%
www.ufop.de
Certification systems
Germany acknowledgement (working systems):
• REDcert
• ISCC System
• 28 Certification companies
• and Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels (RSB/Switzerland)
EU acknowledgement for all memberstates:
• Biomass Biofuels Sustainability voluntary scheme (2BSvs/France)
• Bonsucro EU (Brazil/Ethanol)
• Greenergy Brazilian Bioethanol verification programme (Brazil/Ethanol)
• International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC)
• Abengoa RED Bioenergy Sustainability Assurance (Spain/Ethanol)
• Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB EU RED)
• Roundtable for Responsible Soy (RTRS EU RED)
EU acknowledgement (in preparation):
• REDcert
• others
Who is behind REDcert?
Leading trade organizations of the agri- and biofuel-business
National Recognition authority
REDcertOwner of the
certification scheme
Affected companies Certification bodies
RecognitionSurveillance
plants
Recognition
Surveillance
Contractural incorporation
Sanctions
Contractural incorporation
reporting
OrderCertification
Surveillance Sanctions
System structure
Participants in the REDcert-System (Nov 2011)
total registrations 1.051
Contractors 1.006
- thereof in EC member states 127
Type of operations
(Multiple denominations)
Primary distributor 836
Oilmill 124
Sugarfactory 11
Biofuel producer
Ethanol producer
24
14
Distributor / Trader (liquid bm)
others
87
14
about 2.350
operating sites
Certificates: 952
Certification bodies: 21
Participants in EC member states (Nov 2011)
Belgium
Denmark
Germany
Finland
France
Italy
Luxembourg
Austria
Poland
Slowenia
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
20
8
879
19 1
1
1
66
1
3
1
23
1
www.ufop.de
Farmers „Self-Declaration“in Germany
1. All biomass or limitation for certain cultures
2. Reference January 2008 for arable land / Definiton grassland with high biodiversity expected
3. Restrictions in protected areas?
4. Receiver of direct payments / farm is subject to Cross Compliance
5. Land register and photos of used farm land are available on the farm
6. Default values should be used in NUTS II areas
The declaration applies to all biomass produced on my farm.
The declaration is submitted for the following types of crops:
______________________________________________________________________________
(please list!)
The biomass under 1 originates from cropland that was already cropland prior to 01.01.08. It also
does not originate from protected areas (Article 17 the Directive 2009/28/EC and accordingly Articles
4-6 of the Biomass Sustainability Ordinances) that were converted to cropland after 01.01.2008.
The biomass originates from areas within protected areas where farming is permitted. The
requirements for protected areas have been complied with.
I am subject to cross compliance as a recipient of payments from direct support schemes. The
biomass thus satisfies the requirements for agricultural management (Article 17 the Directive
2009/28/EC and accordingly Articles 7 and 51 of the Sustainability Ordinances).
I participated during the last calendar year in EU direct support schemes.
The notification of participation in such schemes is available.
I have applied/will apply for aid this calendar year.
The documentation on the location of biomass cultivation (verification by means of polygon pursuant
to Article 26 of the Sustainability Ordinances or similar verification of the area via field blocks, plots
or parcels)
is available and can be viewed at any time
is kept with the primary distributor of the biomass I supply.
The default value – if exist - (Article 17/19 of the Directive 2009/28/EC and accordingly Article 8 and
Annex 2 of the Sustainability Ordinances) or the officially approved estimate is to be used for
calculating the greenhouse gas balance.
www.ufop.de
New Challange for Farmers I
• Minimum GHG savings
• GHG savings (EU 35%, 2017 50%, 2018 new 60%)
• GHG-Reduction-Quota (Germany from 2015 on)
• Implementation iLUC (expected EU from 2013 on)
www.ufop.de
www.ufop.de
greenhouse gas-based biofuel quota from 2015 in germany
www.ufop.de
www.ufop.de
Commission Report of iLUC – four policy options
A. Monitoring and developing expertise on iLUC
B. Increasing GHG savings thresholds
C. Introducing additional sustainability criteria for biofuels
D. Introducing differentiated iLUC factors per biofuels type
www.ufop.de
New Challange for Farmers II
• Optimising GHG balance on farm!
and industrie!
www.ufop.de19
RED Default Value – Recalculation Cultivation
Calculations based on: JRC values, DBFZ 2010
www.ufop.de20
RED Default Value - Sensitivity Analysis Cultivation
Calculations based on: JRC values, DBFZ 2010
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
60,00
GH
G e
mis
sion
s in
kg
CO2-
Eq.p
er G
J bio
dies
el
N-fertiliser
P-fertiliser
K-fertliser
Lime
Pesticides
Field emissions
Seed
Diesel
Drying
Calculation base value
53,0
Variation:Biodiesel
50,6
Variation: Urea as N-fertlisier
41,8
Variation:Urea as
N-fertiliser + Biodiesel
39,3
www.ufop.de
RED Default Value - Results
CultivationThe recalculation of the cultivation default value shows the strong influence of the fertiliser production and field emissions
Processing IEmissions from milling process are driven by heat and electricity supply
Processing IIEmissions from refining and trans-esterification are driven by heat and methanol supply
www.ufop.de
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Scenario „Optimum“
0%90% 80% 70% 20% 10%100%
TransportConversion IIConversion IBiomass production
GHG emissions in kg CO2-Eq. per GJ biodiesel
RED Default value
RED typical value
Calculation base value
Scenario Urea as N, Biodiesel, state of the art conversion
Scenario Default value cultivation, state of the art conversion
Scenario Urea as N, Biodiesel, biogenic heat supply Processing
50% 35% 60%
GHG mitigation potential
52
46
46
Scenario Urea as N, Default value for conversion processes
RED Default Value - Summary Results
Comparison of different GHG reduction approaches
22
34
40
31
46
29
www.ufop.de
Summary & Conclusions
The implementation of certification systems is neccessary to continue the biofuel policy, to get the acceptance by politicans and public
A GHG related quota in combination with the GHG mitigation requirements of the FQD will lead to a strong relation between the biofuel price and its GHG reduction potential this could lead to an intense competition
The results from different studies (UFOP, FOP, Canola, Soy, …) represent a theoretical potential for reduction the GHG emissions, they underline the importance for farmers, crushers and biofuel producers to investigate their cultivation and process chain for possibilities to reduce GHG emissions
We need a political answer at the iLUC hypothesis - but not a global iLUC factor or a risk adder!
23
www.ufop.de
Thank you for your attention!
Biodiesel racingcar 2010 – Nürburgring – fuel: B30
www.ufop.de
Contact
Union zur Förderung von Oel- und Proteinpflanzen e. V.Claire-Waldoff-Straße 710117 Berlin
Tel.: +49 (0) 30/31904-202E-Mail: [email protected]: www.ufop.de