www.pewcenteronthestates.org results first using cost-benefit analysis to analyze state policy...

15
www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

Upload: oscar-wood

Post on 27-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Results FirstUsing Cost-Benefit Analysis to

Analyze State Policy

August 6, 2012

Page 2: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Criminal Justice Cost-Benefit Analysis:Big Picture

• Estimate the cost of crime in your state

o Police, Jails, Courts, Probation, Prison, Post-release supervision, Victimization

• Examine programs/policies that reduce crime

• Apply the costs of crime to the programs/ policies that reduce crime to estimate their monetary benefits

Page 3: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Results First Approach

• Aggregate best national research to identify evidence-based programs that are effective

• Estimate these programs’ impact if implemented, based on a state’s unique population characteristics

• Use the state’s fiscal data to estimate total costs and benefits for each program

• Built upon the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP)’s benefit-cost model

Page 4: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Approach can be used in many ways

• Consumer Reports – compare multiple programs

• Prison Economics – examine the trade off between prisons and programs

• Cost of Recidivism – identify the benefits of avoiding one recidivist

• Same approach can be used in other policy areas

Page 5: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Probability of Resource Use

Offense

Unreported Offenses

Reported Offenses

No Arrest

Arrest

No Conviction

Conviction

Local Jail

Probation

Department of Corrections

Post-Prison Supervision

Page 6: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Estimated Convictions Avoided for FFT Participants

Recidivism rates reduced by 22 percent

Without FFT

With FFT

Without FFT, an offender has a 72% chance of being reconvicted for a new felony or

misdemeanor after 15 years;

Reci

divi

sm

Rate

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Reci

divi

sm

Rate

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Follow-up Years

Page 7: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Example: Functional Family Therapy(Washington State - 2010 Dollars)

Benefits Per Family Reduced crime

Increased high school graduation Reduced health care costs

$31,745$5,686

$307

$37,739Total Benefits Per Family

Cost Per Family $3,190

Net Present Value $34,549

Benefits Per Dollar of Cost $11.86

Main Source of Benefits

Lower state & victim costs

Increased earnings

Lower public costs

Addendum (distribution of benefits)$3,599 = Benefits to participant$8,336 = Benefits to taxpayers$21,636 = Benefits to others (crime victims)

Page 8: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Sample “Consumer Reports” List

$11.86

Page 9: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Results First Technical Assistance

• Provide model to state

• Train staff in the approach

• Provide technical assistance

• Help interpret results

• Compile and share lessons learned with other participating states

• Periodically expand and update model

Page 10: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Interest and Participation in Results First

VT

HI

NH

MA

RI

CT

NJ

DE

MD

MEWA

MT ND

SD

MNOR

ID

WY

COUT

NV

CA

AZ NM

NE

KS

OK

TX

AK

LA

AR

MO

IA

WI

MI

IL INOH

PA

NY

WV

KY

TN

MS AL GA

SC

NC

FL

VA

Results First state

AK

Page 11: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Results First State Examples

• Iowao Public Safety Advisory Board and Department of

Corrections

o Iowa Results First: Return on Investment for Corrections Programs – 2012 (May 2012)

• New Mexicoo Legislative Finance Committee, Department of

Corrections, and NM Sentencing Commission staff

o Reducing Recidivism, Cutting Costs and Improving Public Safety in the Incarceration and Supervision of Adult Offenders (June 2012)

Page 12: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Informing Policy

• Iowao DOC budget request

o Modeling mandatory minimum sentencing changes for drug offenses

• New Mexicoo Identifying gaps in reporting for community-based

programs

o Identifying programs that should receive priority funding

Page 13: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

Big picture take-aways

• Research shows that programs can reduce crime and victimization while reducing future spending

• CBA can provide a framework to compare across policy choices and improve public safety

• Results First can assist your state with developing CBA expertise

Page 14: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

For more information

Mike WilsonTechnical Consultant, Results [email protected]

Ashleigh HolandSenior Associate, Results First(202) [email protected]

ConnecticutFloridaIdahoIllinoisIowaKansasMassachusettsNew MexicoNew YorkOregonTexasVermont

Page 15: Www.pewcenteronthestates.org Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012

www.pewcenteronthestates.org

www.pewstates.org/ResultsFirst