wsp tmep “enhanced feed study” geotechnical foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by dr....

159
Appendix C WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore Investigation #2 (Marine Component) - Findings Report, Westridge Loading Facility, Burnaby, BC, March 9, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Appendix C

WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study”

Geotechnical Foreshore Investigation

#2 (Marine Component) - Findings

Report, Westridge Loading Facility,

Burnaby, BC, March 9, 2016

Page 2: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc. 150 12791 Clarke Place Richmond, BC V6V 2H9 Phone: +1 604-278-1411 Fax: +1 604-278-1042 www.wspgroup.com

March 09, 2016 WSP File No: 131-61204-00 (LCL File # R713-1879-00) CH2M Hill Metrotower II, Suite 2100 4720 Kingsway Avenue Burnaby, BC V5H 4N2 Attention: Mr. Mark Clarke, P.Eng. Subject: Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP) – “Enhanced FEED

Study” Geotechnical Foreshore Investigation #2 (Marine Component) – Findings Report Westridge Loading Facility, Burnaby, BC

1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This letter is the WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) findings report that contains the results of the recent geotechnical marine investigation undertaken along the foreshore area at the Kinder Morgan Westridge facility as part of the TMEP Enhanced FEED study. The TMEP development at Westridge will involve the construction of new infrastructure to expand the shiploading capabilities of the facility. We understand that the design for the facility expansion is still evolving, but will include new ship berthing facilities and loading infrastructure on the “marine-side”, and new piping, manifolds, processing equipment, and some small new storage tanks on the “land-side” of the project. WSP has recently completed a geotechnical marine investigation programme for the foreshore portion of the project, which was completed as a component of a larger marine investigation being managed by Golder (also for Kinder Morgan). The WSP marine investigation was completed along the water side of the foreshore to obtain important information regarding soil stratigraphy of the submarine slopes adjacent to the north side of the foreshore. A summary of the WSP geotechnical marine investigation is presented in this findings report, which includes the detailed soil logs and laboratory test results from the investigation. The WSP geotechnical marine investigation programme included two types of geotechnical test holes: sonic drill holes completed to obtain information regarding soil stratigraphy as well as collect continuous soil samples throughout the zone of interest, and seismic cone penetration tests (SCPTs) to obtain information (where possible) in potentially liquefiable soil deposits. The test holes were completed at eight (8) locations arranged as two lines of four locations, approximately parallel to

Page 3: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Page 2 of 4 WSP File No: 131-61204-00 (LCL File # R713-1879-00) Date: March 09, 2016

the foreshore. The sonic test holes were completed first, followed by the SCPTs offset slightly from the sonic hole locations (in order to avoid disturbance effects). In zones where overly dense soils were encountered during the SCPT tests, drillout with the sonic drill was undertake. The locations of the sonic and SCPTs are as shown on the attached Drawing 101. The sonic drill holes were completed using a truck-mounted sonic drill rig (owned and operated by Mud Bay Drilling Company Ltd.) carried by a barge (owned and operated by Van Pile) to the various locations. The approximately 200 mm diameter holes were advanced to depths of between 14.3 and 28.2 m below the seabed surface, depending on location and conditions encountered. Soil samples were collected from the continuous return of the drill. The seismic electronic cone penetration tests (SCPTs) were completed using equipment supplied and operated by ConeTec (and mounted on the Mud Bay drill rig), at locations and depths where the soils were judged to be of appropriate type and density to allow advancement of the cone, in order to assess the liquefaction potential of those soils. Where zones of overly dense soils or obstructive materials were encountered (e.g. cobbles, dense soils, etc.), drillout with the Mud Bay sonic rig was completed. Following completion of the sonic drilling and cone penetration testing, the holes were fully grouted, and the collected samples were returned to the WSP soils and materials laboratory in Richmond for further classification and testing. The locations of the sonic drill holes and the SCPTs are as shown on Drawing 101.

2.0 RESULTS OF GEOTECHNICAL MARINE INVESTIGATION (WINTER, 2015)

The information for the sonic drill holes and the SCPTs should be read together, as the information obtained from one method complements the other at any given location. In general, the SCPTs were completed where soil nature and density permitted; as noted, however, drill-out with the sonic drill was required at some locations and depths. Therefore, gaps appear in the SCPT logs at such locations.

2.1 SONIC DRILLING

The results of the sonic drill holes completed during this current phase of the project are shown on the attached test hole logs SH-101 through SH-108. Note that some gaps are shown on the logs (indicated as “no recovery”); in these zones, the materials within the drilling casing were too loose/disturbed to facilitate sample recovery (generally at the seabed surface).

Page 4: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Page 3 of 4 WSP File No: 131-61204-00 (LCL File # R713-1879-00) Date: March 09, 2016

2.2 SEISMIC CONE PENETRATION TESTS (SCPTS)

The results of the SCPTs are shown on the attached cone plots and pore pressure dissipation test summary. Note that the electronic cone tests capture a wide variety of information, and therefore, several plots are required for each test location/depth, in order to present all of the findings. An overview description of the plots for this investigation is as follows:

For each test location and depth, ConeTec provided three plots:

o A “standard” CPT plot that includes: corrected tip resistance (qt), sleeve friction (fs), friction ratio (Rf), and pore pressure (u);

o An “advanced” plot that includes an interpreted value for undrained shear strength (Su), based on published correlations; and

o A “seismic” plot that includes values for shear wave velocity (Vs) through the soils at various depths.

ConeTec encountered some difficulties during the completion of the SCPTs, during which some loss of the test wave at each location led to incomplete measured shear wave velocity (Vs) data. ConeTec subsequently analyzed the data that was available and prepared an estimated Vs profile, based on empirical correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration testing. These estimated Vs profiles are shown as “Est Vs” on the attached seismic cone plots.

Pore pressure dissipation tests were also completed at select locations and depths. The results of the tests are provided on the attached dissipation curves.

2.3 LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory testing was completed on select soil samples obtained from the sonic drilling, in order to obtain additional information regarding basic soil characteristics. The tests completed include mechanical grain size analysis (sieves), hydrometer tests, and Atterberg Limits tests. A summary of the samples selected for testing, and the testing results, are attached.

3.0 CLOSURE

The results of the geotechnical investigation presented in this report have been prepared by WSP Canada Inc. for the use of CH2M Hill and Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. for the specified project and scope of work. The attached Terms of Reference are an integral part of the report. Any use of the report by third parties, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. WSP Canada Inc. does not accept responsibility for damages suffered, if any, by any third party as a result of their use of this report.

Page 5: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Page 4 of 4 WSP File No: 131-61204-00 (LCL File # R713-1879-00) Date: March 09, 2016

Yours truly,

WSP Canada Inc. [Original signed by: Carl M. Kelman, P.Eng. / Douglas M. Wallis, P.Eng.] Carl M. Kelman, P.Eng. Reviewed by: Douglas M. Wallis, P.Eng. Senior Engineer, Geotechnical Senior Engineer, Geotechnical

CMK/DMW/mg

Encl: Terms of Reference Drawing 101 Sonic Test Hole Logs Seismic Cone Penetration Test Results (Plots and Dissipation Curves)

Page 6: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Version 5 – January 4, 2016 Page 1 of 2

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS

ISSUED BY WSP CANADA INC.

1. STANDARD OF CARE

WSP Canada Inc. (“WSP”) prepared and issued this geotechnical report (the “Report”) for its client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally-accepted engineering consulting practices for the geotechnical discipline. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Unless specifically stated in the Report, the Report does not address environmental issues.

The terms of reference for geotechnical reports issued by WSP (the “Terms of Reference”) contained in the present document provide additional information and caution related to standard of care and the use of the Report. The Client should read and familiarize itself with these Terms of Reference.

2. COMPLETENESS OF THE REPORT

All documents, records, drawings, correspondence, data, files and deliverables, whether hard copy, electronic or otherwise, generated as part of the services for the Client are inherent components of the Report and, collectively, form the instruments of professional services (the “Instruments of Professional Services”). The Report is of a summary nature and is not intended to stand alone without reference to the instructions given to WSP by the Client, the communications between WSP and the Client, and to any other reports, writings, proposals or documents prepared by WSP for the Client relative to the specific site described in the Report, all of which constitute the Report.

TO PROPERLY UNDERSTAND THE INFORMATION, OBSERVATIONS, FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT, REFERENCE MUST BE MADE TO THE WHOLE OF THE REPORT. WSP CANNOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR USE BY ANY PARTY OF PORTIONS OF THE REPORT WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE WHOLE REPORT AND ITS VARIOUS COMPONENTS.

3. BASIS OF THE REPORT

WSP prepared the Report for the Client for the specific site, development, building, design or building assessment objectives and purpose that the Client described to WSP. The applicability and reliability of any of the information, observations, findings, suggestions, recommendations and opinions contained in the Report are only valid to the extent that there was no material alteration to or variation from any of the said descriptions provided by the Client to WSP unless the Client specifically requested WSP to review and revise the Report in light of such alteration or variation.

4. USE OF THE REPORT

The information, observations, findings, suggestions, recommendations and opinions contained in the Report, or any component forming the Report, are for the sole use and benefit of the Client and the team of consultants selected by the Client for the specific project that the Report was provided. NO OTHER PARTY MAY USE OR RELY UPON THE REPORT OR ANY PORTION OR COMPONENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF WSP. WSP will consent to any reasonable request by the Client to approve the use of this Report by other parties designated by the Client as the “Approved Users”. As a condition for the consent of WSP to approve the use of the Report by an Approved User, the Client must provide a copy of these Terms of Reference to that Approved User and the Client must obtain written confirmation from that Approved User that the Approved User will comply with these Terms of Reference, such written confirmation to be provided separately by each Approved User prior to beginning use of the Report. The Client will provide WSP with a copy of the written confirmation from an Approved User when it becomes available to the Client, and in any case, within two weeks of the Client receiving such written confirmation.

The Report and all its components remain the copyright property of WSP and WSP authorises only the Client and the Approved Users to make copies of the Report, but only in such quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the Report by the Client and the Approved Users. The Client and the Approved Users may not give, lend, sell or otherwise disseminate or make the Report, or any portion thereof, available to any party without the written permission of WSP. Any use which a third party makes of the Report, or any portion of the Report, is the sole responsibility of such third parties. WSP accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party resulting from the use of the Report. The Client and the Approved Users acknowledge and agree to indemnify and hold harmless WSP, its officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives or sub-consultants, or any or all of them, against any claim of any nature whatsoever brought against WSP by any third parties, whether in contract or in tort, arising or related to the use of contents of the Report.

Page 7: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Version 5 – January 4, 2016 Page 2 of 2

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS

ISSUED BY WSP CANADA INC. (continued)

5. INTERPRETATION OF THE REPORT

a. Nature and Exactness of Descriptions: The classification and identification of soils, rocks and geological units, as well as engineering assessments and estimates have been based on investigations performed in accordance with the standards set out in Paragraph 1 above. The classification and identification of these items are judgmental in nature and even comprehensive sampling and testing programs, implemented with the appropriate equipment by experienced personnel, may fail to locate some conditions. All investigations or assessments utilizing the standards of Paragraph 1 involve an inherent risk that some conditions will not be detected and all documents or records summarizing such investigations will be based on assumptions of what exists between the actual points sampled. Actual conditions may vary significantly between the points investigated and all persons making use of such documents or records should be aware of, and accept, this risk. Some conditions are subject to changes over time and the parties making use of the Report should be aware of this possibility and understand that the Report only presents the conditions at the sampled points at the time of sampling. Where special concerns exist, or when the Client has special considerations or requirements, the Client must disclose them to WSP so that additional or special investigations may be undertaken, which would not otherwise be within the scope of investigations made by WSP or the purposes of the Report.

b. Reliance on information: The evaluation and conclusions contained in the Report have been prepared on the basis of conditions in evidence at the time of site investigation and field review and on the basis of information provided to WSP. WSP has relied in good faith upon representations, information and instructions provided by the Client and others concerning the site. Accordingly, WSP cannot accept responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in the report as a result of misstatements, omissions, misrepresentations or fraudulent acts of persons providing information.

c. Additional Involvement by WSP: To avoid misunderstandings, WSP should be retained to assist other professionals to explain relevant engineering findings and to review the geotechnical aspects of the plans, drawings and specifications of other professionals relative to the engineering issues pertaining to the geotechnical consulting services provided by WSP. To ensure compliance and consistency with the applicable building codes, legislation, regulations, guidelines and generally-accepted practices, WSP should also be retained to provide field review services during the performance of any related work. Where applicable, it is understood that such field review services must meet or exceed the minimum necessary requirements to ascertain that the work being carried out is in general conformity with the recommendations made by WSP. Any reduction from the level of services recommended by WSP will result in WSP providing qualified opinions regarding adequacy of the work.

6. ALTERNATE REPORT FORMAT

When WSP submits both electronic and hard copy versions of the Instruments of Professional Services, the Client agrees that only the signed and sealed hard copy versions shall be considered final and legally binding upon WSP. The hard copy versions submitted by WSP shall be the original documents for record and working purposes, and, in the event of a dispute or discrepancy, the hard copy versions shall govern over the electronic versions; furthermore, the Client agrees and waives all future right of dispute that the original hard copy signed and sealed versions of the Instruments of Professional Services maintained or retained, or both, by WSP shall be deemed to be the overall originals for the Project.

The Client agrees that the electronic file and hard copy versions of Instruments of Professional Services shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except WSP. The Client warrants that the Instruments of Professional Services will be used only and exactly as submitted by WSP.

The Client recognizes and agrees that WSP prepared and submitted electronic files using specific software or hardware systems, or both. WSP makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the current or future software and hardware systems of the Client, the Approved Users or any other party. The Client further agrees that WSP is under no obligation, unless otherwise expressly specified, to provide the Client, the Approved Users and any other party, or any or all of them, with specific software and hardware systems that are compatible with any electronic submitted by WSP. The Client further agrees that should the Client, an Approved User or a third party require WSP to provide specific software or hardware systems, or both, compatible with the electronic files prepared and submitted by WSP, for any reason whatsoever included but not restricted to an order from a court, then the Client will pay WSP for all reasonable costs related to the provision of the specific software or hardware systems, or both. The Client further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless WSP, its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative or sub-consultant, or any or all of them, against any claim or any nature whatsoever brought against WSP, whether in contract or in tort, arising or related to the provision or use or any specific software or hardware provided by WSP.

Page 8: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration
Page 9: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

No Recovery (soft or loose soil).

Soft gr.br. gravelly sandy SILT, some clay.

Soft br. clayey SILT, some sand, some gravel,trace organics.

Soft gr.br. clayey SILT, some sand, gravel,some organics, wood.

Gr. sandy SILT, some gravel,with a 12" silty sand & gravel layer at 19'.(appears dense)

Hard gr. clayey SILT (Glaciated).

Hard gr. sandy SILT, some gravel (Glaciated).

Hard gr. clayey SILT (Glaciated).

Hard gr. SILT, some clay, trace fine sand (Glaciated).

Hard gr. clayey SILT (Glaciated).

Hard gr. layered clayey SILT and SILT, some clay,trace fine sand, gravel (Glaciated).

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 2

SH-101

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 10: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace to some gravel(Glaciated). (continued)

Hard gr. silty CLAY, trace gravel (Glaciated).

Dense gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL.

Hard gr. silty CLAY (Glaciated).

Bottom of hole at 89.0 feet.

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-101

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 11: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Very soft dark gr. organic SILT, some fine sand

Soft gr. sandy SILT, some gravel

Loose gr. gravelly silty SAND, trace shells

Dense layered gr. sandy SILT and silty SAND, somegravel (Glaciated)

Hard gr. SILT, some sand, some clay (Glaciated)

Hard gr. clayey SILT, some sandy layers (Glaciated)

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some clay, some gravel(Glaciated)

Hard gr. clayey SILT (Glaciated)

Dense gr. silty SAND, some gravel (Glacial TILL)

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace sand layers (Glaciated)

G

G

G

G

G

G

GG

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

GG

Pg 1 of 2

SH-102

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 20/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 12: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace sand layers (Glaciated)(continued)

Hard gr. silty CLAY, some sandy Silt layers(Glaciated)

Bottom of hole at 81.0 feet.

G

G

G

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-102

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 20/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 13: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

No Recovery (soft or loose soil).

Loose gr. silty SAND, some gravel.

Soft gr. sandy SILT, some gravel.

Loose gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL.

Soft gr. sandy SILT, some organics, wood, gravel.

Loose gr.br. sandy SILT and GRAVEL.

Loose gr.br. SAND and GRAVEL, some silt.

Soft gr.br. sandy SILT, some gravel, trace clay, shells.

Loose gr.br. silty SAND, GRAVEL,and crushed SHELLS.

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, trace clay,(Glacial TILL).

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace gravel above 28'(Glaciated).

Hard gr. SILT, some clay (Glaciated).

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace gravel,some gravel above 42' (Glaciated).

Hard gr. SILT, some clay, gravel (Glaciated).

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, clay (GlacialTILL).

Dense gr. sandy SILT and GRAVEL, some clay,some cobbles (Glacial TILL).

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 2

SH-103

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 14: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, clay (GlacialTILL). (continued)

Dense gr. sandy SILT and GRAVEL, some clay,some cobbles (Glacial TILL),No Recovery.

Bottom of hole at 80.0 feet.

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-103

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 15: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

No Recovery (soft or loose soil).

Soft / loose gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, trace wood

Loose gr. gravelly silty SAND, trace shells

Dense gr. gravelly sandy SILT (Glacial TILL)

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some clay, some gravel(Glacial TILL)

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 2

SH-104

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 16: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Hard gr. SILT, some clay, some gravel / cobbles(Glaciated) (continued)

Dense layered gr. sandy SILT and silty SAND, somegravel (Glaciated)

Very dense fine to med. SAND, some fine gravel(Glacial TILL)

Bottom of hole at 83.0 feet.

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-104

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 21/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 17: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Very soft br. SILT and WOOD, some sand,top 2' is black.

Soft gr. sandy SILT, some wood, gravel, trace clay.

Loose gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL, some wood.

Soft gr.br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel.

Soft gr.br. sandy SILT, some silty sand, gravel,trace clay, organics, shells.

Loose gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL.

Hard gr. clayey SILT, some gravel (Glaciated).

Hard gr. clayey SILT, trace fine sand, gravel,(Glaciated).

Hard gr. clayey SILT and SILT, some clay,trace fine sand (Glaciated).

Bottom of hole at 47.0 feet.

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 1

SH-105

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 20/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

MC = 170.1%

Page 18: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Very soft gr. silty SAND, some gravel, trace shells

Soft grey sandy SILT, trace gravel and shells

Loose gr. SAND, some silt to silty, some gravel

trace shells from 19' to 24'

Gr. Sand and Gravel, some silt, trace shells

Dense gr. gravelly sandy SILT (Glacial TILL)

Hard gr. SILT, some clay (Glaciated)

Hard gr. clayey SILT (Glaciated)

Bottom of hole at 56.0 feet.

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 1

SH-106

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 20/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 19: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Soft gr. gravelly sandy SILT, some silty sand layers.

Soft gr. sandy SILT.

Loose gr. silty SAND, some fine gravel, shells.

Loose gr. gravelly silty SAND, some shells.

Loose gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL, some shells.

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, clay (GlacialTILL).

Very stiff to hard gr. clayey SILT,trace fine gravel below 36' (Glaciated).

Dense gr. silty SAND and GRAVEL.

Hard gr. clayey SILT, some sand andgravel above 51.5' (Glaciated).

Dense gr. SAND and GRAVEL, some silt.

Hard gr. clayey SILT, some gravel (Glaciated).

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, clay,some cobbles below 70' (Glacial TILL).

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 2

SH-107

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 19/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 20: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, clay,some cobbles below 70' (Glacial TILL). (continued)

Bottom of hole at 77.0 feet.

G

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-107

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 19/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: RG

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 21: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Loose gr. silty SAND, some gravel, trace shells

Soft sandy SILT, some gravel, trace shells

No Recovery (soft or loose soil).

Gr. silty SAND, some gravel, trace shells

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel (Glacial TILL)

Hard gr. clayey sandy SILT, some gravel (Glaciated)

Hard gr. clayey SILT, some gravel (Glaciated)

Hard gr. clayey sandy SILT, some gravel (Glaciated)

Dense gr. sandy SILT, some gravel (Glacial TILL)

Dense gr. silty SAND (Glaciated)

Dense fine SAND, some silt (Glaciated)

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 2

SH-108

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 23/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

(ft)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 22: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Very dense gr. fine to med. SAND, and silty SAND,some fine gravel (Glaciated) (continued)

Bottom of hole at 92.5 feet.

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 2 of 2

SH-108

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 23/11/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content %

Plastic Limit %

Liquid Limit %

Ground Water Level

Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer)

Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined)

Shear strength in kPa (field vane)

Remolded strength in kPa

Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wate

rLevel

Kinder Morgan Westridge TerminalBurnaby, B.C.

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SonicTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Type

N

By: ABC

Drill Method:

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

(m)

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

(ft)

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

Project No: R713-1879-00

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 L

OG

PE

R P

AG

E

R7

13

-18

79

-00

-

WE

ST

RID

GE

SH

10

1-1

08

.DE

C 2

01

5.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

.GD

T

22

/12

/15

Page 23: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Cone Penetration Test Summary and

Standard Cone Penetration Test Plots

Page 24: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Job No: 15-02111

Client: Levelton Consultants

Project: Westridge Terminal

Start Date: 25-Nov-2015

End Date: 26-Nov-2015

CONE PENETRATION TEST SUMMARY

Sounding ID File Name Date ConeAssumed Phreatic

Surface1 (m)

Mudline

Depth2

(m)

Final

Depth3

(m)

Northing4

(m)

Easting

(m)

Elevation5

(m)

Refer to

Notation

Number

SCPT15-101A 15-02111_SP101A 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -6.9 6.33 5.750 5459630.75 503186.14 -5.20 7, 8

SCPT15-102B 15-02111_SP102B 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -9.2 9.22 4.225 5459663.77 503289.89 -7.85 7

SCPT15-103C 15-02111_SP103C 25-Nov-2015 288:T375F10U200 -6.9 5.57 5.400 5459685.22 503349.98 -5.81 7

SCPT15-104D 15-02111_SP104D 25-Nov-2015 288:T375F10U200 -13.1 10.75 8.575 5459726.33 503413.68 -9.22 6, 7

SCPT15-104Db 15-02111_SP104DB 25-Nov-2015 288:T375F10U200 -9.8 8.65 2.250 5459725.46 503411.44 -8.68 7

SCPT15-105E 15-02111_SP105E 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -6.4 6.55 5.500 5459635.68 503179.55 -6.34 7, 8

SCPT15-106F 15-02111_SP106F 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -13.1 12.63 4.800 5459681.43 503276.38 -12.25 7, 8

SCPT15-106Fb 15-02111_SP106FB 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -14.0 12.04 2.950 5459682.01 503281.47 -12.06 7

SCPT15-107G 15-02111_SP107G 26-Nov-2015 293:T1500F15U500 -15.3 13.35 5.600 5459706.70 503335.93 -12.86 7

SCPT15-108H 15-02111_SP108H 26-Nov-2015 288:T375F10U200 -10.4 8.61 6.000 5459732.51 503407.99 -11.32 7, 8

1. The phreatic surface was determined using pore pressure dissipations. Hydrostatic conditions were used for the interpretation tables.

2. Mudline depth from the water surface at the start of test.

3. The penetration depths are referenced to the existing mudline at the time of testing.

4. Coordinate were surveyed using RTK as-built survey and were collected in NAD83 UTM Zone 10 North.

5. Elevations are referenced to the existing mudline at the time of testing.

6. Sounding terminated as cone is believed to have entered an earlier bore hole, no digital data presented.

7. Due to shallow test depths and large horizontal offsets, no interpretations were possible with the collected seismic data using the interval travel time method.

8. Average Vs estimated using the first break shear wave arrival at the final seismic depth in the profile.

Sheet 1 of 1

Page 25: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 16:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-101A

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.750 m / 18.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP101A.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459630.75m E: 503186.14m Elev: -5.20m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 26: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 08:38

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-102B

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.225 m / 13.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP102B.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459663.77m E: 503289.89m Elev: -7.85m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 27: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 5.400 m / 17.72 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP103C.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459685.22m E: 503349.98m Elev: -5.81m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Clay

Sandy Silt

Sensitive Fines

Sandy Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 28: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 17:06

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104D

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 8.575 m / 28.13 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104D.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459726.33m E: 503413.68m Elev: -9.22m

Undefined

Clay

Silty Clay

Silt

Sensitive Fines

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silt

Sensitive Fines

Terminated Terminated Terminated Terminated

MUDLINE

SOUNDING IN DISTURBED MATERIAL

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 29: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 20:31

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104Db

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 2.250 m / 7.38 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104DB.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459725.46m E: 503411.44m Elev: -8.68m

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 30: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.500 m / 18.04 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP105E.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459635.68m E: 503179.55m Elev: -6.34m

Undefined

Silty Clay

Clay

Sensitive Fines

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 31: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 10:51

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106F

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.800 m / 15.75 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106F.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459681.43m E: 503276.38m Elev: -12.25m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 32: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 13:50

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106Fb

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 2.950 m / 9.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106FB.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459682.01m E: 503281.47m Elev: -12.06m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Clay

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 33: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.600 m / 18.37 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP107G.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459706.70m E: 503335.93m Elev: -12.86m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Sandy Silt

Silt

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 34: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 00:49

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-108H

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 6.000 m / 19.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP108H.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459732.51m E: 503407.99m Elev: -11.32m

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Clayey Silt

Clay

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Undefined

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Silty Clay

Silt

Sandy Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 35: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Advanced Cone Penetration Test Plots with

Undrained Shear Strength (Nkt)

Page 36: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 16:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-101A

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.750 m / 18.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP101A.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459630.75m E: 503186.14m Elev: -5.20m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 37: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 08:38

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-102B

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.225 m / 13.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP102B.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459663.77m E: 503289.89m Elev: -7.85m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 38: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 5.400 m / 17.72 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP103C.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459685.22m E: 503349.98m Elev: -5.81m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Clay

Sandy Silt

Sensitive Fines

Sandy Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 39: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 17:06

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104D

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 8.575 m / 28.13 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104D.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459726.33m E: 503413.68m Elev: -9.22m

Undefined

Clay

Silty Clay

Silt

Sensitive Fines

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silt

Sensitive Fines

Terminated Terminated Terminated Terminated

MUDLINE

SOUNDING IN DISTURBED MATERIAL

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 40: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 20:31

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104Db

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 2.250 m / 7.38 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104DB.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459725.46m E: 503411.44m Elev: -8.68m

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 41: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.500 m / 18.04 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP105E.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459635.68m E: 503179.55m Elev: -6.34m

Undefined

Silty Clay

Clay

Sensitive Fines

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 42: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 10:51

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106F

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.800 m / 15.75 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106F.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459681.43m E: 503276.38m Elev: -12.25m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Sand

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 43: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 13:50

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106Fb

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 2.950 m / 9.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106FB.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459682.01m E: 503281.47m Elev: -12.06m

Undefined

Clayey Silt

Clay

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 44: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.600 m / 18.37 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP107G.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459706.70m E: 503335.93m Elev: -12.86m

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Undefined

Sensitive Fines

Clayey Silt

Sensitive Fines

Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Sandy Silt

Silt

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 45: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0 125 250

Su (Nkt) (kPa)

0 50 1000

u (m)

0 6 12

SBT

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 00:49

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-108H

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 6.000 m / 19.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP108H.CORUnit Wt: SBT ZonesSu Nkt: 15.0

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459732.51m E: 503407.99m Elev: -11.32m

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Clayey Silt

Clay

Silty Clay

Sandy Silt

Undefined

Silt

Clayey Silt

Silt

Sandy Silt

Silty Sand/Sand

Undefined

Sandy Silt

Silty Clay

Silt

Sandy Silt

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 46: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 16:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-101A

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.750 m / 18.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP101A.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459630.75m E: 503186.14m Elev: -5.20m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 47: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 08:38

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-102B

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.225 m / 13.86 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP102B.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459663.77m E: 503289.89m Elev: -7.85m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 48: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 5.400 m / 17.72 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP103C.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459685.22m E: 503349.98m Elev: -5.81m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 49: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 17:06

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104D

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 8.575 m / 28.13 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104D.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459726.33m E: 503413.68m Elev: -9.22m

Terminated Terminated Terminated Terminated Terminated

MUDLINE

SOUNDING IN DISTURBED MATERIAL

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 50: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:25:15 20:31

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104Db

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 2.250 m / 7.38 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP104DB.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459725.46m E: 503411.44m Elev: -8.68m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 51: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.500 m / 18.04 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP105E.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459635.68m E: 503179.55m Elev: -6.34m

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 52: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 10:51

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106F

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 4.800 m / 15.75 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106F.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459681.43m E: 503276.38m Elev: -12.25m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 53: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 13:50

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106Fb

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 2.950 m / 9.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP106FB.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459682.01m E: 503281.47m Elev: -12.06m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 54: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 5.600 m / 18.37 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP107G.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459706.70m E: 503335.93m Elev: -12.86m

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight Cone Fell Under Own Weight

Page 55: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 150 300

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

qt (bar)

De

pth

(m

ete

rs)

0.0 1.0 2.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0

Rf (%)

0 50 100 150 200

Est Vs (m/s)

0 50 100 150 200

Vs (m/s)

Levelton ConsultantsJob No: 15-02111

Date: 11:26:15 00:49

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-108H

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Max Depth: 6.000 m / 19.68 ftDepth Inc: 0.025 m / 0.082 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02111_SP108H.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10 N: 5459732.51m E: 503407.99m Elev: -11.32m

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

MUDLINE

Equilibrium Pore Pressure (Ueq) Assumed Ueq Hydrostatic LineDissipation, Ueq not achievedDissipation, Ueq achieved

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out

Page 56: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Pore Pressure Dissipation Summary and

Pore Pressure Dissipation Plots

Page 57: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Job No: 15-02111

Client: Levelton Consultants

Project: Westridge Terminal

Start Date: 25-Nov-2015

End Date: 26-Nov-2015

CPTu PORE PRESSURE DISSIPATION SUMMARY

Sounding ID File NameCone Area

(cm2)

Duration

(s)

Test Depth

(m)

Estimated

Equilibrium Pore

Pressure Ueq

(m)

Calculated

Phreatic

Surface

(m)

SCPT15-101A 15-02111_SP101A 15 250 3.675 Not Achieved

SCPT15-101A 15-02111_SP101A 15 300 5.750 12.6 -6.9

SCPT15-102B 15-02111_SP102B 15 300 4.225 13.4 -9.2

SCPT15-103C 15-02111_SP103C 15 375 3.025 Not Achieved

SCPT15-103C 15-02111_SP103C 15 130 5.350 12.2 -6.9

SCPT15-103C 15-02111_SP103C 15 125 5.400 12.3 -6.9

SCPT15-104D 15-02111_SP104D 15 105 6.550 19.6 -13.1

SCPT15-104D 15-02111_SP104D 15 225 8.575 22.0 -13.4

SCPT15-104Db 15-02111_SP104Db 15 230 2.250 12.1 -9.8

SCPT15-105E 15-02111_SP105E 15 335 2.750 Not Achieved

SCPT15-105E 15-02111_SP105E 15 200 3.625 Not Achieved

SCPT15-105E 15-02111_SP105E 15 200 5.250 11.7 -6.4

SCPT15-105E 15-02111_SP105E 15 200 5.450 11.9 -6.5

SCPT15-106F 15-02111_SP106F 15 100 3.750 16.8 -13.1

SCPT15-106F 15-02111_SP106F 15 380 4.725 17.7 -12.9

SCPT15-106Fb 15-02111_SP106Fb 15 105 1.575 Not Achieved

SCPT15-106Fb 15-02111_SP106Fb 15 300 2.950 16.0 -13.1

SCPT15-107G 15-02111_SP107G 15 375 3.250 17.6 -14.3

SCPT15-107G 15-02111_SP107G 15 185 4.100 18.4 -14.3

SCPT15-107G 15-02111_SP107G 15 160 5.075 19.4 -14.4

SCPT15-108H 15-02111_SP108H 15 125 3.300 13.7 -10.4

SCPT15-108H 15-02111_SP108H 15 260 3.800 14.4 -10.6

Sheet 1 of 1

Page 58: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 16:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-101A

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP101A.PPF

Depth: 3.675 m / 12.057 ft

Duration: 250.0 s

U Min: 2.0 m

U Max: 7.1 m

Page 59: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 16:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-101A

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP101A.PPF

Depth: 5.750 m / 18.865 ft

Duration: 300.0 s

U Min: 12.5 m

U Max: 13.0 m

WT: -6.847 m / -22.464 ft

Ueq: 12.6 m

Page 60: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 08:38

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-102B

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP102B.PPF

Depth: 4.225 m / 13.861 ft

Duration: 300.0 s

U Min: 13.4 m

U Max: 13.7 m

WT: -9.195 m / -30.167 ft

Ueq: 13.4 m

Page 61: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP103C.PPF

Depth: 3.025 m / 9.924 ft

Duration: 375.0 s

U Min: 12.9 m

U Max: 14.9 m

Page 62: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP103C.PPF

Depth: 5.350 m / 17.552 ft

Duration: 130.0 s

U Min: 12.1 m

U Max: 12.4 m

WT: -6.858 m / -22.500 ft

Ueq: 12.2 m

Page 63: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 12:39

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-103C

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP103C.PPF

Depth: 5.400 m / 17.716 ft

Duration: 125.0 s

U Min: 12.2 m

U Max: 12.3 m

WT: -6.851 m / -22.477 ft

Ueq: 12.3 m

Page 64: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 17:06

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104D

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP104D.PPF

Depth: 6.550 m / 21.489 ft

Duration: 105.0 s

U Min: 16.1 m

U Max: 20.0 m

WT: -13.060 m / -42.847 ft

Ueq: 19.6 m

Page 65: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 17:06

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104D

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP104D.PPF

Depth: 8.575 m / 28.133 ft

Duration: 225.0 s

U Min: 22.0 m

U Max: 24.0 m

WT: -13.373 m / -43.874 ft

Ueq: 21.9 m

Page 66: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/25/2015 20:31

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-104Db

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP104Db.PPF

Depth: 2.250 m / 7.382 ft

Duration: 230.0 s

U Min: 12.0 m

U Max: 12.1 m

WT: -9.828 m / -32.244 ft

Ueq: 12.1 m

Page 67: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP105E.PPF

Depth: 2.750 m / 9.022 ft

Duration: 335.0 s

U Min: 2.5 m

U Max: 10.7 m

Page 68: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP105E.PPF

Depth: 3.625 m / 11.893 ft

Duration: 200.0 s

U Min: -0.2 m

U Max: 8.4 m

Page 69: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP105E.PPF

Depth: 5.250 m / 17.224 ft

Duration: 200.0 s

U Min: 3.5 m

U Max: 11.8 m

WT: -6.440 m / -21.128 ft

Ueq: 11.7 m

Page 70: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 20:08

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-105E

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP105E.PPF

Depth: 5.450 m / 17.880 ft

Duration: 200.0 s

U Min: 2.2 m

U Max: 12.0 m

WT: -6.449 m / -21.158 ft

Ueq: 11.9 m

Page 71: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 10:51

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106F

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP106F.PPF

Depth: 3.750 m / 12.303 ft

Duration: 100.0 s

U Min: 16.7 m

U Max: 16.9 m

WT: -13.047 m / -42.805 ft

Ueq: 16.8 m

Page 72: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 10:51

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106F

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP106F.PPF

Depth: 4.725 m / 15.502 ft

Duration: 380.0 s

U Min: 17.5 m

U Max: 17.9 m

WT: -12.937 m / -42.444 ft

Ueq: 17.7 m

Page 73: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 50 100 150 200

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 13:50

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106Fb

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP106Fb.PPF

Depth: 1.575 m / 5.167 ft

Duration: 105.0 s

U Min: 12.6 m

U Max: 15.6 m

Page 74: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 13:50

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-106Fb

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP106Fb.PPF

Depth: 2.950 m / 9.678 ft

Duration: 300.0 s

U Min: 15.1 m

U Max: 16.4 m

WT: -13.067 m / -42.870 ft

Ueq: 16.0 m

Page 75: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP107G.PPF

Depth: 3.250 m / 10.663 ft

Duration: 375.0 s

U Min: 17.4 m

U Max: 21.2 m

WT: -14.326 m / -47.001 ft

Ueq: 17.6 m

Page 76: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP107G.PPF

Depth: 4.100 m / 13.451 ft

Duration: 185.0 s

U Min: 18.4 m

U Max: 18.5 m

WT: -14.342 m / -47.053 ft

Ueq: 18.4 m

Page 77: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 05:01

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-107G

Cone: 293:T1500F15U500

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP107G.PPF

Depth: 5.075 m / 16.650 ft

Duration: 160.0 s

U Min: 18.5 m

U Max: 20.1 m

WT: -14.362 m / -47.119 ft

Ueq: 19.4 m

Page 78: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 00:49

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-108H

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP108H.PPF

Depth: 3.300 m / 10.827 ft

Duration: 125.0 s

U Min: 11.4 m

U Max: 14.0 m

WT: -10.423 m / -34.196 ft

Ueq: 13.7 m

Page 79: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

0 100 200 300 400

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Time (s)

Pore

Pre

ssure

(m

)Levelton Consultants

Job No: 15-02111

Date: 11/26/2015 00:49

Site: Westridge Terminal, Burnaby BC

Sounding: SCPT15-108H

Cone: 288:T375F10U200

Cone Area: 15 sq cm

Trace Summary:

Filename: 15-02111_SP108H.PPF

Depth: 3.800 m / 12.467 ft

Duration: 260.0 s

U Min: 13.7 m

U Max: 14.4 m

WT: -10.572 m / -34.685 ft

Ueq: 14.4 m

Page 80: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Drill Hole No. & Depth Grain Size Hydrometer Atterberg

SH-101

10' X X X

19' X X

SH-102

5' X X X

12' X

17' X

SH-103

7' X

14' X X

17' X

SH-104

7' X X X

15' X

SH-105

5' X X

10' X

13' X

16' X

19' X

SH-106

5' X

12' X X

15' X

18' X

25' X

SH-107

1.5' X

9' X

13' X

SH-108

3' X X

22' X

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

Marine Investigation Laboratory Testing Summary

Feburary, 2016

Page 81: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 926.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 587.1

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 339.63/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 51.1%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 39.1 4.2 95.8

- 12.5 1/2 65.6 7.1 88.7

- 9.4 3/8 26.6 2.9 85.8

4 4.75 66.7 7.2 78.6

10 2 57.8 6.2 72.4

-10 - 670.9 - -

16 1.18 36.5 3.9 68.5

30 0.6 50.9 5.5 63.0

50 0.3 80.3 8.7 54.3

100 0.15 85.2 9.2 45.1

140 0.106 42.4 4.6 40.5

200 0.075 32.5 3.5 37.0

PAN 3.5 0.4

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-101

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

10 ft.

Page 82: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 95.8

12.5 88.7

9.4 85.8

4.75 78.6

2 72.4

1.180 68.5

0.600 63.0

0.300 54.3

0.150 45.1

0.106 40.5

0.075 37.0

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-101

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 10 ft.

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 83: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 579.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 329.9

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 249.83/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 60.0%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 89.5 15.4 84.6

- 19 3/4 0.0

- 12.5 1/2 25.5 4.4 80.2

- 9.4 3/8 4.9 0.8 79.3

4 4.75 19.7 3.4 75.9

10 2 20.4 3.5 72.4

-10 - 419.7 - -

16 1.18 14.4 2.5 69.9

30 0.6 23.3 4.0 65.9

50 0.3 44.0 7.6 58.3

100 0.15 46.7 8.1 50.3

140 0.106 21.4 3.7 46.6

200 0.075 18.3 3.2 43.4

PAN 2.0 0.3

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016

KTD / RG

19 ft.

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-101

Page 84: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 84.6

19 #N/A

12.5 80.2

9.4 79.3

4.75 75.9

2 72.4

1.180 69.9

0.600 65.9

0.300 58.3

0.150 50.3

0.106 46.6

0.075 43.4

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD / RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 19 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-101

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 85: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 914.4largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 571.1

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 343.33/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 49.7%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 34.6 3.8 96.2

- 12.5 1/2 27.3 3.0 93.2

- 9.4 3/8 26.8 2.9 90.3

4 4.75 59.7 6.5 83.8

10 2 63.3 6.9 76.8

-10 - 702.7 - -

16 1.18 42.1 4.6 72.2

30 0.6 58.6 6.4 65.8

50 0.3 87.6 9.6 56.3

100 0.15 86.0 9.4 46.9

140 0.106 42.9 4.7 42.2

200 0.075 34.9 3.8 38.3

PAN 5.6 0.6

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

5 ft.

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

SH-102

Page 86: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 96.2

12.5 93.2

9.4 90.3

4.75 83.8

2 76.8

1.180 72.2

0.600 65.8

0.300 56.3

0.150 46.9

0.106 42.2

0.075 38.3

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 5 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-102

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 87: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1937.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1856

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 81.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 23.7%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 462.4 23.9 76.1

- 25.4 1 611.4 31.6 44.6

- 19 3/4 141.2 7.3 37.3

- 12.5 1/2 143.0 7.4 29.9

- 9.4 3/8 59.0 3.0 26.9

4 4.75 97.2 5.0 21.9

10 2 75.0 3.9 18.0

-10 - 348.5 - -

16 1.18 39.5 2.0 15.9

30 0.6 43.4 2.2 13.7

50 0.3 72.5 3.7 10.0

100 0.15 71.4 3.7 6.3

140 0.106 23.3 1.2 5.1

200 0.075 15.5 0.8 4.3

PAN 0.9 0.0

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. sandy GRAVEL, some silt, tr. shells

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-102

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016

KTD / RG

12 ft.

Page 88: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. sandy GRAVEL, some silt, tr. shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 100.0

37.5 76.1

25.4 44.6

19 37.3

12.5 29.9

9.4 26.9

4.75 21.9

2 18.0

1.180 15.9

0.600 13.7

0.300 10.0

0.150 6.3

0.106 5.1

0.075 4.3

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-102

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

KTD / RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 12 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 89: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 779.3largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 581.2

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 198.13/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 34.6%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 59.7 7.7 92.3

- 12.5 1/2 36.3 4.7 87.7

- 9.4 3/8 16.1 2.1 85.6

4 4.75 43.5 5.6 80.0

10 2 45.8 5.9 74.2

-10 - 577.9 - -

16 1.18 36.1 4.6 69.5

30 0.6 63.2 8.1 61.4

50 0.3 129.9 16.7 44.7

100 0.15 102.6 13.2 31.6

140 0.106 25.9 3.3 28.3

200 0.075 19.7 2.5 25.7

PAN 1.8 0.2

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016

KTD / RG

17 ft.

gr. silty SAND, some gravel

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-102

Page 90: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. silty SAND, some gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 92.3

12.5 87.7

9.4 85.6

4.75 80.0

2 74.2

1.180 69.5

0.600 61.4

0.300 44.7

0.150 31.6

0.106 28.3

0.075 25.7

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD / RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 17 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 3, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-102

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 91: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 2836.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 2639.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 197.23/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 15.8%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 0 100.0

- 50 2 387.0 13.6 86.4

- 37.5 1 1/2 0.0

- 25.4 1 56.3 2.0 84.4

- 19 3/4 118.7 4.2 80.2

- 12.5 1/2 239.9 8.5 71.7

- 9.4 3/8 129.0 4.5 67.2

4 4.75 318.3 11.2 56.0

10 2 324.7 11.4 44.5

-10 - 1262.7 - -

16 1.18 183.8 6.5 38.0

30 0.6 244.6 8.6 29.4

50 0.3 324.6 11.4 18.0

100 0.15 203.2 7.2 10.8

140 0.106 65.5 2.3 8.5

200 0.075 40.4 1.4 7.1

PAN 2.7 0.1

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, some silt

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-103

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016

RG / KTD

7 ft.

Page 92: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, some silt DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 100.0

50 86.4

37.5 #N/A

25.4 84.4

19 80.2

12.5 71.7

9.4 67.2

4.75 56.0

2 44.5

1.180 38.0

0.600 29.4

0.300 18.0

0.150 10.8

0.106 8.5

0.075 7.1

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-103

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 7 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 93: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1576.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1218.0

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 358.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 36.0%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 122.7 7.8 92.2

- 19 3/4 13.4 0.8 91.4

- 12.5 1/2 86.2 5.5 85.9

- 9.4 3/8 70.3 4.5 81.4

4 4.75 135.8 8.6 72.8

10 2 131.7 8.4 64.5

-10 - 1016.6 - -

16 1.18 83.5 5.3 59.2

30 0.6 111.1 7.0 52.1

50 0.3 169.4 10.7 41.4

100 0.15 169.0 10.7 30.7

140 0.106 69.4 4.4 26.3

200 0.075 47.9 3.0 23.2

PAN 6.9 0.4

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. gravelly silty SAND

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-103

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016

RG / KTD

14 ft.

Page 94: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. gravelly silty SAND DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 92.2

19 91.4

12.5 85.9

9.4 81.4

4.75 72.8

2 64.5

1.180 59.2

0.600 52.1

0.300 41.4

0.150 30.7

0.106 26.3

0.075 23.2

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-103

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 14 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 95: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1796.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1694.6

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 102.03/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 14.3%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 107.4 6.0 94.0

- 25.4 1 50.4 2.8 91.2

- 19 3/4 141.8 7.9 83.3

- 12.5 1/2 225.8 12.6 70.8

- 9.4 3/8 101.5 5.6 65.1

4 4.75 211.9 11.8 53.3

10 2 221.6 12.3 41.0

-10 - 736.2 - -

16 1.18 93.8 5.2 35.8

30 0.6 77.1 4.3 31.5

50 0.3 137.6 7.7 23.8

100 0.15 209.4 11.7 12.2

140 0.106 76.9 4.3 7.9

200 0.075 36.1 2.0 5.9

PAN 3.5 0.2

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, with shells, some silt

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-103

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016

RG / KTD

17 ft.

Page 96: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, with shells, some silt DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 100.0

37.5 94.0

25.4 91.2

19 83.3

12.5 70.8

9.4 65.1

4.75 53.3

2 41.0

1.180 35.8

0.600 31.5

0.300 23.8

0.150 12.2

0.106 7.9

0.075 5.9

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-103

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 17 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 97: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1587.5largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1008.8

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 578.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 49.6%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 187.6 11.8 88.2

- 25.4 1 77.3 4.9 83.3

- 19 3/4 17.2 1.1 82.2

- 12.5 1/2 17.4 1.1 81.1

- 9.4 3/8 17.0 1.1 80.1

4 4.75 36.8 2.3 77.7

10 2 35.8 2.3 75.5

-10 - 1198.4 - -

16 1.18 21.5 1.4 74.1

30 0.6 29.9 1.9 72.3

50 0.3 74.8 4.7 67.5

100 0.15 214.2 13.5 54.0

140 0.106 161.7 10.2 43.9

200 0.075 99.2 6.2 37.6

PAN 16.1 1.0

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

7 ft.

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-104

131-61204-00

Page 98: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 100.0

37.5 88.2

25.4 83.3

19 82.2

12.5 81.1

9.4 80.1

4.75 77.7

2 75.5

1.180 74.1

0.600 72.3

0.300 67.5

0.150 54.0

0.106 43.9

0.075 37.6

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 7 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-104

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 99: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1556.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1374.8

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 181.83/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 35.7%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 606.1 38.9 61.1

- 37.5 1 1/2 0.0

- 25.4 1 54.2 3.5 57.6

- 19 3/4 44.2 2.8 54.7

- 12.5 1/2 71.5 4.6 50.1

- 9.4 3/8 44.1 2.8 47.3

4 4.75 112.7 7.2 40.1

10 2 102.5 6.6 33.5

-10 - 521.3 - -

16 1.18 53.0 3.4 30.1

30 0.6 47.3 3.0 27.0

50 0.3 58.7 3.8 23.3

100 0.15 94.4 6.1 17.2

140 0.106 47.8 3.1 14.1

200 0.075 33.2 2.1 12.0

PAN 4.3 0.3

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. silty SAND & GRAVEL, trace shells

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-104

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016

RG / KTD

15 ft.

Page 100: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. silty SAND & GRAVEL, trace shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 100.0

50 61.1

37.5 #N/A

25.4 57.6

19 54.7

12.5 50.1

9.4 47.3

4.75 40.1

2 33.5

1.180 30.1

0.600 27.0

0.300 23.3

0.150 17.2

0.106 14.1

0.075 12.0

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-104

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 15 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 101: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1134.4largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 766.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 3683/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 48.5%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 43.6 3.8 96.2

- 19 3/4 84.7 7.5 88.7

- 12.5 1/2 59.1 5.2 83.5

- 9.4 3/8 31.9 2.8 80.7

4 4.75 73.8 6.5 74.2

10 2 69.9 6.2 68.0

-10 - 771.4 - -

16 1.18 39.2 3.5 64.5

30 0.6 56.4 5.0 59.6

50 0.3 96.8 8.5 51.0

100 0.15 104.9 9.2 41.8

140 0.106 53.3 4.7 37.1

200 0.075 44.8 3.9 33.1

PAN 5.8 0.5

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

5 ft.

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-105

131-61204-00

Page 102: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 96.2

19 88.7

12.5 83.5

9.4 80.7

4.75 74.2

2 68.0

1.180 64.5

0.600 59.6

0.300 51.0

0.150 41.8

0.106 37.1

0.075 33.1

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 5 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-105

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 103: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1206.5largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1053.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 153.13/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 25.2%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 111.5 9.2 90.8

- 25.4 1 84.5 7.0 83.8

- 19 3/4 31.1 2.6 81.2

- 12.5 1/2 86.2 7.1 74.0

- 9.4 3/8 55.0 4.6 69.5

4 4.75 110.4 9.2 60.3

10 2 108.6 9.0 51.3

-10 - 619.2 - -

16 1.18 62.0 5.1 46.2

30 0.6 82.7 6.9 39.3

50 0.3 136.3 11.3 28.0

100 0.15 117.6 9.7 18.3

140 0.106 38.8 3.2 15.1

200 0.075 25.9 2.1 12.9

PAN 2.9 0.2

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016

RG / KTD

10 ft.

gr. silty SAND & GRAVEL, some wood

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-105

Page 104: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. silty SAND & GRAVEL, some wood DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 100.0

37.5 90.8

25.4 83.8

19 81.2

12.5 74.0

9.4 69.5

4.75 60.3

2 51.3

1.180 46.2

0.600 39.3

0.300 28.0

0.150 18.3

0.106 15.1

0.075 12.9

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 10 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 5, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-105

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 105: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 684.3largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 421.6

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 262.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 51.5%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 17.3 2.5 97.5

- 12.5 1/2 43.6 6.4 91.1

- 9.4 3/8 23.0 3.4 87.7

4 4.75 43.4 6.3 81.4

10 2 42.5 6.2 75.2

-10 - 514.5 - -

16 1.18 28.4 4.2 71.0

30 0.6 38.9 5.7 65.4

50 0.3 61.8 9.0 56.3

100 0.15 64.4 9.4 46.9

140 0.106 29.8 4.4 42.6

200 0.075 26.0 3.8 38.8

PAN 2.5 0.4

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-105

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016

KTD

13 ft.

Page 106: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 97.5

12.5 91.1

9.4 87.7

4.75 81.4

2 75.2

1.180 71.0

0.600 65.4

0.300 56.3

0.150 46.9

0.106 42.6

0.075 38.8

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-105

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 13 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 107: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 2026.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1876.0

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 150.63/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 14.1%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 340.1 16.8 83.2

- 19 3/4 106.6 5.3 78.0

- 12.5 1/2 99.1 4.9 73.1

- 9.4 3/8 69.3 3.4 69.6

4 4.75 123.3 6.1 63.6

10 2 201.5 9.9 53.6

-10 - 1086.7 - -

16 1.18 134.4 6.6 47.0

30 0.6 179.3 8.8 38.1

50 0.3 335.6 16.6 21.6

100 0.15 212.0 10.5 11.1

140 0.106 44.6 2.2 8.9

200 0.075 26.3 1.3 7.6

PAN 2.2 0.1

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016

KTD

19 ft.

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, trace shells

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-105

Page 108: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, trace shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 83.2

19 78.0

12.5 73.1

9.4 69.6

4.75 63.6

2 53.6

1.180 47.0

0.600 38.1

0.300 21.6

0.150 11.1

0.106 8.9

0.075 7.6

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 19 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-105

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 109: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 951.4largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 702.3

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 249.13/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 47.4%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 71.7 7.5 92.5

- 19 3/4 83.6 8.8 83.7

- 12.5 1/2 67.2 7.1 76.6

- 9.4 3/8 48.1 5.1 71.6

4 4.75 80.1 8.4 63.1

10 2 64.3 6.8 56.4

-10 - 536.4 - -

16 1.18 37.0 3.9 52.5

30 0.6 47.0 4.9 47.6

50 0.3 62.8 6.6 41.0

100 0.15 64.2 6.7 34.2

140 0.106 44.7 4.7 29.5

200 0.075 26.2 2.8 26.8

PAN 5.4 0.6

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-106

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016

RG

5 ft.

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, tr. shells

Page 110: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. sandy SILT, some gravel, tr. shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 92.5

19 83.7

12.5 76.6

9.4 71.6

4.75 63.1

2 56.4

1.180 52.5

0.600 47.6

0.300 41.0

0.150 34.2

0.106 29.5

0.075 26.8

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-106

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 5 ft.

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 111: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 747.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 574

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 173.63/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 24.4%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 100.0

- 12.5 1/2 0.0 100.0

- 9.4 3/8 2.3 0.3 99.7

4 4.75 4.6 0.6 99.1

10 2 13.0 1.7 97.3

-10 - 727.7 - -

16 1.18 24.0 3.2 94.1

30 0.6 64.8 8.7 85.5

50 0.3 146.7 19.6 65.8

100 0.15 193.0 25.8 40.0

140 0.106 69.7 9.3 30.7

200 0.075 51.9 6.9 23.8

PAN 3.7 0.5

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

12 ft.

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. silty SAND, trace gravel

SH-106

Page 112: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. silty SAND, trace gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 #N/A

19 #N/A

12.5 100.0

9.4 99.7

4.75 99.1

2 97.3

1.180 94.1

0.600 85.5

0.300 65.8

0.150 40.0

0.106 30.7

0.075 23.8

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 12 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-106

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 113: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested By:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1102.0largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1016.9

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 85.13/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 14.1%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 48.2 4.4 95.6

- 12.5 1/2 66.3 6.0 89.6

- 9.4 3/8 74.2 6.7 82.9

4 4.75 145.4 13.2 69.7

10 2 153.9 14.0 55.7

-10 - 614.0 - -

16 1.18 93.8 8.5 47.2

30 0.6 108.0 9.8 37.4

50 0.3 137.1 12.4 25.0

100 0.15 125.4 11.4 13.6

140 0.106 41.7 3.8 9.8

200 0.075 20.5 1.9 7.9

PAN 1.5 0.1

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016

KTD

15 ft.

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, shells

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-106

Page 114: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 95.6

12.5 89.6

9.4 82.9

4.75 69.7

2 55.7

1.180 47.2

0.600 37.4

0.300 25.0

0.150 13.6

0.106 9.8

0.075 7.9

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 15 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 9, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-106

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 115: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1234.4largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1093.9

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 140.53/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 16.6%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 100.0

- 12.5 1/2 7.3 0.6 99.4

- 9.4 3/8 14.4 1.2 98.2

4 4.75 95.6 7.7 90.5

10 2.0 244.8 19.8 70.7

-10 - 872.3 - -

16 1.18 162.8 13.2 57.5

30 0.6 180.2 14.6 42.9

50 0.3 180.3 14.6 28.3

100 0.15 134.0 10.9 17.4

140 0.106 42.3 3.4 14.0

200 0.075 27.6 2.2 11.8

PAN 4.3 0.3

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

gr. SAND, some gravel, silt, shells

Feb. 10, 2016

RG

18 ft.

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-106

131-61204-00

Page 116: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. SAND, some gravel, silt, shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 #N/A

19 100.0

12.5 99.4

9.4 98.2

4.75 90.5

2.0 70.7

1.180 57.5

0.600 42.9

0.300 28.3

0.150 17.4

0.106 14.0

0.075 11.8

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SILT

RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 18 ft.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-106

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 117: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1530.9largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1342.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 188.53/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 20.4%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 56.8 3.7 96.3

- 19 3/4 0.0

- 12.5 1/2 128.6 8.4 87.9

- 9.4 3/8 90.5 5.9 82.0

4 4.75 184.6 12.1 69.9

10 2.0 115.3 7.5 62.4

-10 - 955.1 - -

16 1.18 83.1 5.4 57.0

30 0.6 149.4 9.8 47.2

50 0.3 226.4 14.8 32.4

100 0.15 188.1 12.3 20.1

140 0.106 68.1 4.4 15.7

200 0.075 44.7 2.9 12.8

PAN 6.8 0.4

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-106

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016

RG / KTD

25 ft.

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, shells

Page 118: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. gravelly SAND, some silt, shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 96.3

19 #N/A

12.5 87.9

9.4 82.0

4.75 69.9

2.0 62.4

1.180 57.0

0.600 47.2

0.300 32.4

0.150 20.1

0.106 15.7

0.075 12.8

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-106

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 25 ft.

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 119: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1880.2largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1455.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 424.83/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 46.7%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 488.3 26.0 74.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 153.6 8.2 65.9

- 25.4 1 43.9 2.3 63.5

- 19 3/4 27.0 1.4 62.1

- 12.5 1/2 63.0 3.4 58.7

- 9.4 3/8 24.5 1.3 57.4

4 4.75 61.9 3.3 54.1

10 2.0 72.7 3.9 50.3

-10 - 945.3 - -

16 1.18 64.5 3.4 46.8

30 0.6 55.2 2.9 43.9

50 0.3 105.4 5.6 38.3

100 0.15 140.2 7.5 30.8

140 0.106 74.6 4.0 26.9

200 0.075 64.1 3.4 23.5

PAN 16.4 0.9

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-107

131-61204-00

Feb. 11, 2016

RG / KTD

1.5 ft.

gr. sandy SILT & GRAVEL

Page 120: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. sandy SILT & GRAVEL DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 100.0

50 74.0

37.5 65.9

25.4 63.5

19 62.1

12.5 58.7

9.4 57.4

4.75 54.1

2.0 50.3

1.180 46.8

0.600 43.9

0.300 38.3

0.150 30.8

0.106 26.9

0.075 23.5

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 11, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-107

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 1.5 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 121: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1387.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1236.4

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 151.23/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 16.2%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 45.8 3.3 96.7

- 19 3/4 92.5 6.7 90.0

- 12.5 1/2 64.4 4.6 85.4

- 9.4 3/8 40.2 2.9 82.5

4 4.75 74.8 5.4 77.1

10 2.0 78.6 5.7 71.4

-10 - 991.3 - -

16 1.18 76.0 5.5 66.0

30 0.6 111.8 8.1 57.9

50 0.3 207.7 15.0 42.9

100 0.15 311.2 22.4 20.5

140 0.106 82.9 6.0 14.5

200 0.075 40.7 2.9 11.6

PAN 9.5 0.7

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-107

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016

RG

9 ft.

gr. SAND, with shells, some gravel, silt

Page 122: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. SAND, with shells, some gravel, silt DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 96.7

19 90.0

12.5 85.4

9.4 82.5

4.75 77.1

2.0 71.4

1.180 66.0

0.600 57.9

0.300 42.9

0.150 20.5

0.106 14.5

0.075 11.6

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 10, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-107

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 9 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 123: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1749.6largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1636.7

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 112.93/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 12.9%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 145.4 8.3 91.7

- 19 3/4 38.6 2.2 89.5

- 12.5 1/2 109.4 6.3 83.2

- 9.4 3/8 103.3 5.9 77.3

4 4.75 197.7 11.3 66.0

10 2.0 266.7 15.2 50.8

-10 - 888.5 - -

16 1.18 152.2 8.7 42.1

30 0.6 132.8 7.6 34.5

50 0.3 172.3 9.8 24.6

100 0.15 216.0 12.3 12.3

140 0.106 71.0 4.1 8.2

200 0.075 29.3 1.7 6.6

PAN 2.0 0.1

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-107

131-61204-00

Feb. 12, 2016

RG

13 ft.

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, with shells, some silt

Page 124: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. SAND & GRAVEL, with shells, some silt DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 #N/A

50 #N/A

37.5 100.0

25.4 91.7

19 89.5

12.5 83.2

9.4 77.3

4.75 66.0

2.0 50.8

1.180 42.1

0.600 34.5

0.300 24.6

0.150 12.3

0.106 8.2

0.075 6.6

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 12, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-107

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 13 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 125: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 517.1largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 422.2

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 94.93/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 20.0%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 37.5 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 100.0

- 12.5 1/2 100.0

- 9.4 3/8 0.0 100.0

4 4.75 3.7 0.7 99.3

10 2 17.6 3.4 95.9

-10 - 495.8 - -

16 1.18 22.7 4.4 91.5

30 0.6 36.6 7.1 84.4

50 0.3 89.9 17.4 67.0

100 0.15 159.9 30.9 36.1

140 0.106 55.6 10.8 25.4

200 0.075 30.8 6.0 19.4

PAN 4.2 0.8

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. silty SAND, trace gravel

SH-108

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016

KTD

3 ft.

Page 126: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. br. silty SAND, trace gravel DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

37.5 #N/A

25.4 #N/A

19 #N/A

12.5 #N/A

9.4 100.0

4.75 99.3

2 95.9

1.180 91.5

0.600 84.4

0.300 67.0

0.150 36.1

0.106 25.4

0.075 19.4

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Jan. 28, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-108

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 3 ft.

75

3"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 127: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1687.0largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1424.1

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 262.93/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 % fines of portion passing #10 sieve: 24.0%

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 75 3 100.0

- 50 2 274.6 16.3 83.7

- 37.5 1 1/2 89.5 5.3 78.4

- 25.4 1 51.8 3.1 75.3

- 19 3/4 0.0

- 12.5 1/2 48.1 2.9 72.5

- 9.4 3/8 9.3 0.6 71.9

4 4.75 20.5 1.2 70.7

10 2.0 45.7 2.7 68.0

-10 - 1147.5 - -

16 1.18 50.4 3.0 65.0

30 0.6 85.3 5.1 60.0

50 0.3 228.3 13.5 46.4

100 0.15 337.0 20.0 26.5

140 0.106 103.4 6.1 20.3

200 0.075 67.1 4.0 16.4

PAN 12.3 0.7

Specific Gravitiy

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

0

0.5

1

2

4

8

15

30

60

120

240

480

1440

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

SH-108

131-61204-00

Feb. 12, 2016

RG

22 ft.

gr. silty gravelly SAND, some shells

Page 128: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

gr. silty gravelly SAND, some shells DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

75 100.0

50 83.7

37.5 78.4

25.4 75.3

19 #N/A

12.5 72.5

9.4 71.9

4.75 70.7

2.0 68.0

1.180 65.0

0.600 60.0

0.300 46.4

0.150 26.5

0.106 20.3

0.075 16.4

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 12, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

SH-108

PROJECT:

DRILL HOLE NO.:

SILT

RG

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 22 ft.

50

2"

37.5

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2.0

No.

10

1.1

80

No.

16

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.5

1/2

"

3"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t P

assin

g

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 129: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 579.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 329.9

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 249.83/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 Hydrometer Weight (g): 80

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 38 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 89.5 15.4 84.6

- 19 3/4 0.0

- 12.7 1/2 25.5 4.4 80.2

- 9.4 3/8 4.9 0.8 79.3

4 4.75 19.7 3.4 75.9

10 2 20.4 3.5 72.4

-10 - 419.7 - -

16 1.18 14.4 2.5 69.9

30 0.6 23.3 4.0 65.9

50 0.3 44.0 7.6 58.3

100 0.15 46.7 8.1 50.3

140 0.106 21.4 3.7 46.6

200 0.075 18.3 3.2 43.4

PAN 2.0 0.3

Specific Gravitiy 2.7

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

Feb 22-16 7:50 AM 0 17.4 7 50 38.1

Feb 22-16 7:50:30AM 0.5 17.4 7.0 46.0 0.0575 34.5

Feb 22-16 7:51 AM 1 17.4 7.0 39.5 0.0431 28.7

Feb 22-16 7:52 AM 2 17.5 7.0 36.0 0.0313 25.4

Feb 22-16 7:54 AM 4 17.5 7.0 32.0 0.0229 21.9

Feb 22-16 7:58 AM 8 17.6 7.0 27.0 0.0167 17.4

Feb 22-16 8:05 AM 15 17.6 7.0 24.0 0.0125 14.7

Feb 22-16 8:20 AM 30 17.8 7.0 22.0 0.0089 13.0

Feb 22-16 8:50 AM 60 18 7.0 19.0 0.0064 10.3

Feb 22-16 9:50 AM 120 18.6 7.0 16.0 0.0046 7.7

Feb 22-16 11:50 AM 240 19 7.0 14.0 0.0033 6.0

Feb 22-16 3:50 PM 480 20 7.0 13.0 0.0023 5.4

Feb 23-16 7:50 AM 1440 19.1 7.0 11.0 0.0014 3.3

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

16.4

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

38.5

32.0

28.4

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. SILT, some gravel

SH-101

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016

RG / KTD

19 ft.

3.7

42.5

19.4

24.4

6.7

8.6

11.5

14.5

6.0

Page 130: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

38 100.0

25.4 84.6

19 #N/A

12.7 80.2

9.4 79.3

4.75 75.9

2 72.4

1.180 69.9

0.600 65.9

0.300 58.3

0.150 50.3

0.106 46.6

0.075 43.4

0.0575 34.5

0.0431 28.7

0.0313 25.4

0.0229 21.9

0.0167 17.4

0.0125 14.7

0.0089 13.0

0.0064 10.3

0.0046 7.7

0.0033 6.0

0.0023 5.4

0.0014 3.3

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

gr. br. SILT, some gravel

DRILL HOLE NO.:

PROJECT:

SILT

Kelly Dumas, AScT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 19 ft.

SH-101

75

3"

38

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.1

6

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.7

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t F

iner

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 131: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 914.4largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 571.1

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 343.33/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 Hydrometer Weight (g): 95

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 38 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 34.6 3.8 96.2

- 12.7 1/2 27.3 3.0 93.2

- 9.4 3/8 26.8 2.9 90.3

4 4.75 59.7 6.5 83.8

10 2 63.3 6.9 76.8

-10 - 702.7 - -

16 1.18 42.1 4.6 72.2

30 0.6 58.6 6.4 65.8

50 0.3 87.6 9.6 56.3

100 0.15 86.0 9.4 46.9

140 0.106 42.9 4.7 42.2

200 0.075 34.9 3.8 38.3

PAN 5.6 0.6

Specific Gravitiy 2.7

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

Feb 22-16 8:08 AM 0 17.7 7 51 34.8

Feb 22-16 8:08:30AM 0.5 17.7 7.0 47.0 0.0567 31.6

Feb 22-16 8:09 AM 1 17.7 7.0 42.0 0.0420 27.6

Feb 22-16 8:10 AM 2 17.7 7.0 40.0 0.0302 26.0

Feb 22-16 8:12 AM 4 17.7 7.0 37.0 0.0219 23.6

Feb 22-16 8:16 AM 8 17.8 7.0 33.0 0.0160 20.4

Feb 22-16 8:23 AM 15 17.9 7.0 30.5 0.0119 18.4

Feb 22-16 8:38 AM 30 18 7.0 28.0 0.0085 16.4

Feb 22-16 9:08 AM 60 18.2 7.0 25.0 0.0061 14.0

Feb 22-16 10:08 AM 120 18.6 7.0 21.0 0.0044 10.9

Feb 22-16 12:08 PM 240 19 7.0 18.5 0.0032 9.0

Feb 22-16 4:08 PM 480 20 7.0 16.5 0.0022 7.6

Feb 23-16 8:08 AM 1440 19.2 7.0 14.0 0.0013 5.36.7

43.4

25.5

29.4

11.2

13.6

17.5

20.5

9.5

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016

RG / KTD

5 ft.Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

SH-102

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

23.0

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

39.4

34.4

32.4

Project Location:

Page 132: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

38 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 96.2

12.7 93.2

9.4 90.3

4.75 83.8

2 76.8

1.180 72.2

0.600 65.8

0.300 56.3

0.150 46.9

0.106 42.2

0.075 38.3

0.0567 31.6

0.0420 27.6

0.0302 26.0

0.0219 23.6

0.0160 20.4

0.0119 18.4

0.0085 16.4

0.0061 14.0

0.0044 10.9

0.0032 9.0

0.0022 7.6

0.0013 5.3

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 5 ft.

SH-102

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

DRILL HOLE NO.:

PROJECT:

SILT

75

3"

38

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.1

6

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.7

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t F

iner

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 133: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1587.5largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1008.8

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 578.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 Hydrometer Weight (g): 95

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 38 1 1/2 187.6 11.8 88.2

- 25.4 1 77.3 4.9 83.3

- 19 3/4 17.2 1.1 82.2

- 12.7 1/2 17.4 1.1 81.1

- 9.4 3/8 17.0 1.1 80.1

4 4.75 36.8 2.3 77.7

10 2 35.8 2.3 75.5

-10 - 1198.4 - -

16 1.18 21.5 1.4 74.1

30 0.6 29.9 1.9 72.3

50 0.3 74.8 4.7 67.5

100 0.15 214.2 13.5 54.0

140 0.106 161.7 10.2 43.9

200 0.075 99.2 6.2 37.6

PAN 16.1 1.0

Specific Gravitiy 2.7

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

Feb 22-16 9:15 AM 0 18.3 7 49 32.7

Feb 22-16 9:15:30AM 0.5 18.3 7.0 44.0 0.0579 28.8

Feb 22-16 9:16 AM 1 18.4 7.0 38.0 0.0431 24.1

Feb 22-16 9:17 AM 2 18.4 7.0 36.0 0.0310 22.5

Feb 22-16 9:19 AM 4 18.4 7.0 33.5 0.0223 20.5

Feb 22-16 9:23 AM 8 18.4 7.0 31.5 0.0160 18.9

Feb 22-16 9:30 AM 15 18.4 7.0 29.5 0.0119 17.4

Feb 22-16 9:45 AM 30 18.6 7.0 28.0 0.0085 16.2

Feb 22-16 10:15 AM 60 18.6 7.0 25.0 0.0061 13.9

Feb 22-16 11:15 AM 120 18.8 7.0 22.5 0.0044 11.9

Feb 22-16 1:15 PM 240 19.3 7.0 20.0 0.0031 10.1

Feb 22-16 5:15 PM 480 20.1 7.0 18.0 0.0022 8.7

Feb 23-16 9:15 AM 1440 19.4 7.0 15.0 0.0013 6.2

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

22.1

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

36.6

30.6

28.6

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel

SH-104

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016

RG / KTD

7 ft.

7.8

41.6

24.1

26.1

12.8

15.2

17.6

20.6

11.0

Page 134: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 100.0

38 88.2

25.4 83.3

19 82.2

12.7 81.1

9.4 80.1

4.75 77.7

2 75.5

1.180 74.1

0.600 72.3

0.300 67.5

0.150 54.0

0.106 43.9

0.075 37.6

0.0579 28.8

0.0431 24.1

0.0310 22.5

0.0223 20.5

0.0160 18.9

0.0119 17.4

0.0085 16.2

0.0061 13.9

0.0044 11.9

0.0031 10.1

0.0022 8.7

0.0013 6.2

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

gr. br. sandy SILT, some clay, gravel

DRILL HOLE NO.:

PROJECT:

SILT

Kelly Dumas, AScT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 7 ft.

SH-104

75

3"

38

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.1

6

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.7

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t F

iner

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 135: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 926.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 587.1

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 339.63/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 Hydrometer Weight (g): 90

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 38 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 100.0

- 19 3/4 39.1 4.2 95.8

- 12.7 1/2 65.6 7.1 88.7

- 9.4 3/8 26.6 2.9 85.8

4 4.75 66.7 7.2 78.6

10 2 57.8 6.2 72.4

-10 - 670.9 - -

16 1.18 36.5 3.9 68.5

30 0.6 50.9 5.5 63.0

50 0.3 80.3 8.7 54.3

100 0.15 85.2 9.2 45.1

140 0.106 42.4 4.6 40.5

200 0.075 32.5 3.5 37.0

PAN 3.5 0.4

Specific Gravitiy 2.7

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

Feb 22-16 8:31 AM 0 17.9 7 51 34.6

Feb 22-16 8:31:30am 0.5 17.9 7.0 47.0 0.0566 31.4

Feb 22-16 8:32 AM 1 17.9 7.0 43.0 0.0415 28.3

Feb 22-16 8:33 AM 2 18 7.0 41.0 0.0299 26.7

Feb 22-16 8:35 AM 4 18 7.0 38.0 0.0217 24.3

Feb 22-16 8:39 AM 8 18 7.0 35.0 0.0157 21.9

Feb 22-16 8:46 AM 15 18 7.0 32.0 0.0117 19.5

Feb 22-16 9:01 AM 30 18.1 7.0 28.0 0.0085 16.3

Feb 22-16 9:31 AM 60 18.4 7.0 25.0 0.0061 14.0

Feb 22-16 10:31 AM 120 18.7 7.0 22.0 0.0044 11.7

Feb 22-16 12:31 PM 240 19.1 7.0 19.0 0.0032 9.3

Feb 22-16 4:31 PM 480 20 7.0 17.0 0.0022 8.0

Feb 23-16 8:31 AM 1440 19.3 7.0 14.0 0.0013 5.46.8

43.5

27.5

30.5

11.7

14.6

17.6

20.5

10.0

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016

RG / KTD

10 ft.Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

SH-101

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

24.5

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

39.5

35.5

33.5

Project Location:

Page 136: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

38 #N/A

25.4 100.0

19 95.8

12.7 88.7

9.4 85.8

4.75 78.6

2 72.4

1.180 68.5

0.600 63.0

0.300 54.3

0.150 45.1

0.106 40.5

0.075 37.0

0.0566 31.4

0.0415 28.3

0.0299 26.7

0.0217 24.3

0.0157 21.9

0.0117 19.5

0.0085 16.3

0.0061 14.0

0.0044 11.7

0.0032 9.3

0.0022 8.0

0.0013 5.4

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

Kelly Dumas, AScT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 10 ft.

SH-101

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

gr. br. SILT, some clay, sand, gravel

DRILL HOLE NO.:

PROJECT:

SILT

75

3"

38

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.1

6

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.7

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t F

iner

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 137: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

WSP Canada Inc.#150 - 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, B.C. V6V 2H9

Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

Project: Project No.

Test Date:

Tested by:

Sample Depth:

Issued Date:Soil Sample Size (ASTM D1140-92)

Nominal Diam. of Approximate minimum Initial Dry Weight (g): 1576.7largest particle mass of sample (g) Washed Dry Weight (g): 1218

No. 4 sieve 100 Washed (g): 358.73/8" 500 Split Weight (g):3/4" 2500 Hydrometer Weight (g): 125

Sieve no.

Diam.

(mm)

Diam.

(inches)

Weight

Retained

(g) % Retained

%

Passing

Max

Req.

Min

Req.

- 100 4 100.0

- 75 3 100.0

- 38 1 1/2 100.0

- 25.4 1 122.7 7.8 92.2

- 19 3/4 13.4 0.8 91.4

- 12.7 1/2 86.2 5.5 85.9

- 9.4 3/8 70.3 4.5 81.4

4 4.75 135.8 8.6 72.8

10 2 131.7 8.4 64.5

-10 - 1016.6 - -

16 1.18 83.5 5.3 59.2

30 0.6 111.1 7.0 52.1

50 0.3 169.4 10.7 41.4

100 0.15 169.0 10.7 30.7

140 0.106 69.4 4.4 26.3

200 0.075 47.9 3.0 23.2

PAN 6.9 0.4

Specific Gravitiy 2.7

Date

Time

of

reading

Elapsed

Time

(min)

Temp.

C Corr.

Actual

Hyd.

Reading

Size

(mm)

%

Passing

Feb 22-16 8:52 AM 0 18 7 51 22.2

Feb 22-16 8:52:30AM 0.5 18 7.0 46.0 0.0571 19.7

Feb 22-16 8:53 AM 1 18 7.0 42.0 0.0419 17.6

Feb 22-16 8:54 AM 2 18 7.0 40.0 0.0301 16.6

Feb 22-16 8:56 AM 4 18.1 7.0 37.5 0.0217 15.3

Feb 22-16 9:00 AM 8 18.1 7.0 34.0 0.0158 13.5

Feb 22-16 9:07 AM 15 18.2 7.0 32.0 0.0117 12.5

Feb 22-16 9:22 AM 30 18.4 7.0 30.0 0.0084 11.5

Feb 22-16 9:52 AM 60 18.6 7.0 27.0 0.0060 10.0

Feb 22-16 10:52 AM 120 18.8 7.0 23.5 0.0044 8.3

Feb 22-16 12:52 PM 240 19.2 7.0 20.5 0.0031 6.8

Feb 22-16 4:52 PM 480 20 7.0 18.0 0.0022 5.6

Feb 23-16 8:52 AM 1440 19.3 7.0 15.0 0.0013 4.0

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

Material Specification

24.5

Hydrometer

Mechanical Analysis

Corrected

Hyd.

Reading

38.5

34.5

32.5

Project Location:

Drill Hole No.:

Soil Description:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

Kinder Morgan Westridge Terminal

gr. gravelly silty SAND

SH-103

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016

RG / KTD

14 ft.

7.8

43.5

26.5

30.0

13.3

16.2

19.6

22.6

11.0

Page 138: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WSP Canada Inc.

PROJECT NO.: #150 - 12791 Clarke Place

DATE TESTED: Richmond, B.C.

DATE ISSUED: Canada V6V 2H9

TESTED BY: Tel.: 604-278-1411

Fax.: 604-278-1042

CLAY

Sieve Analysis Material Specification

Sieve % Max Min

Size (mm) Passing Req. Req.

100 #N/A

75 #N/A

38 100.0

25.4 92.2

19 91.4

12.7 85.9

9.4 81.4

4.75 72.8

2 64.5

1.180 59.2

0.600 52.1

0.300 41.4

0.150 30.7

0.106 26.3

0.075 23.2

0.0571 19.7

0.0419 17.6

0.0301 16.6

0.0217 15.3

0.0158 13.5

0.0117 12.5

0.0084 11.5

0.0060 10.0

0.0044 8.3

0.0031 6.8

0.0022 5.6

0.0013 4.0

REMARKS: Tested as per ASTM C136 & C117.

WSP Canada Inc.

Per:

This report constitutes a testing service only. No engineering interpretation opinion is expressed or implied. Engineering review and interpretation can be provided on written request.

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SANDGRAVEL

131-61204-00

Feb. 22, 2016SOIL DESCRIPTION:

TMEP Enhanced FEED Study

gr. gravelly silty SAND

DRILL HOLE NO.:

PROJECT:

SILT

Kelly Dumas, AScT

RG / KTD

SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES

SAMPLE DEPTH: 14 ft.

SH-103

75

3"

38

1-1

/2"

19

3/4

"

3/8

"

4.7

5N

o.

4

2N

o.

10

1.1

80

No.1

6

0.6

00

No.

30

0.3

00

No.

50

0.1

50

No.

100

No.

140

0.0

75

No.

200

0.0

02

0.0

2

25.4

1"

12.7

1/2

"

4"

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0

01

0.0

1

0.11

10

100

Perc

en

t F

iner

Particle Diameter, mm

Page 139: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

TIN NUMBER 101-2 101-3 101-4 101-5 101-6

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 10 15 15 25 28

WET WEIGHT 17.88 17.68 17.93 17.85 17.3

DRY WEIGHT 14.71 14.64 14.88 14.94 14.53

MOISTURE 3.17 3.04 3.05 2.91 2.77

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.04 1.06 1.05 1.05

SOIL WEIGHT 13.65 13.6 13.82 13.89 13.48

WATER CONTENT 23.2% 22.4% 22.1% 21.0% 20.5%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 101-7 101-8

WET WEIGHT 28.91 25.25

DRY WEIGHT 25.1 22.02

MOISTURE 3.81 3.23

TIN WEIGHT 1.05 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 24.05 20.96

WATER CONTENT 15.8% 15.4%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 101-1

WET WEIGHT 54.76

DRY WEIGHT 45.93

MOISTURE 8.83

TIN WEIGHT 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 44.87

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 19.7%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

20.9% 15.6%

5.3% 19.7%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-101

gr. SILT, some clay, some sand

Feb. 1, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

10 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

Page 140: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-101

Depth: 10 ft.

Technician: RG

LL20.9%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 141: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-101

Depth: 10 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 142: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

TIN NUMBER 102-2 102-3 102-4 102-5 102-6

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 11 20 25 30 31

WET WEIGHT 19.4 18.33 18.74 14.54 15.48

DRY WEIGHT 16.35 15.61 16 12.48 13.29

MOISTURE 3.05 2.72 2.74 2.06 2.19

TIN WEIGHT 1.07 1.07 1.06 1.07 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 15.28 14.54 14.94 11.41 12.23

WATER CONTENT 20.0% 18.7% 18.3% 18.1% 17.9%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 102-7 102-8

WET WEIGHT 27.19 27.81

DRY WEIGHT 24.03 24.6

MOISTURE 3.16 3.21

TIN WEIGHT 1.05 1.05

SOIL WEIGHT 22.98 23.55

WATER CONTENT 13.8% 13.6%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 102-1

WET WEIGHT 55.6

DRY WEIGHT 47.22

MOISTURE 8.38

TIN WEIGHT 1.07

SOIL WEIGHT 46.15

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 18.2%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

5 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

18.3% 13.7%

4.6% 18.2%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-102

gr. SILT, some clay, some sand

Feb. 1, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 143: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-102

Depth: 5 ft.

Technician: RG

LL18.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 144: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-102

Depth: 5 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 145: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

TIN NUMBER 104-3 104-4 104-5 104-6 104-7

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 12 13 16 25 33

WET WEIGHT 19.2 15.59 13.09 18.04 16.23

DRY WEIGHT 16 13.12 11.07 15.22 13.77

MOISTURE 3.2 2.47 2.02 2.82 2.46

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.07 1.06 1.07 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 14.94 12.05 10.01 14.15 12.71

WATER CONTENT 21.4% 20.5% 20.2% 19.9% 19.4%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 104-8 104-9

WET WEIGHT 29.44 28.63

DRY WEIGHT 25.71 25.04

MOISTURE 3.73 3.59

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 24.65 23.98

WATER CONTENT 15.1% 15.0%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 104-1

WET WEIGHT 69.45

DRY WEIGHT 58.06

MOISTURE 11.39

TIN WEIGHT 1.07

SOIL WEIGHT 56.99

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 20.0%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

7 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

19.8% 15.1%

4.7% 20.0%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-104

gr. SILT, some clay, some sand

Feb. 1, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 146: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-104

Depth: 7 ft.

Technician: RG

LL19.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 147: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-104

Depth: 7 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 148: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

TIN NUMBER 105-2A 105-3A 105-4A 105-5A 105-6A

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 10 16 19 28 31

WET WEIGHT 17.01 15.42 12.75 14.71 15.1

DRY WEIGHT 14.26 13.04 10.84 12.5 12.84

MOISTURE 2.75 2.38 1.91 2.21 2.26

TIN WEIGHT 1.07 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 13.19 11.98 9.78 11.44 11.78

WATER CONTENT 20.8% 19.9% 19.5% 19.3% 19.2%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 105-7A 105-8A

WET WEIGHT 25.29 26.85

DRY WEIGHT 22.23 23.58

MOISTURE 3.06 3.27

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.07

SOIL WEIGHT 21.17 22.51

WATER CONTENT 14.5% 14.5%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 105-1A

WET WEIGHT 64.28

DRY WEIGHT 54.45

MOISTURE 9.83

TIN WEIGHT 1.07

SOIL WEIGHT 53.38

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 18.4%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

5 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

19.4% 14.5%

4.9% 18.4%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-105

gr. SILT, some clay, some sand

Feb. 1, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 149: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-105

Depth: 5 ft.

Technician: RG

LL19.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 150: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 1, 2016

Hole Number SH-105

Depth: 5 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 151: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

TIN NUMBER 105-2B 105-3B 105-4B 105-5B 105-6B

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 11 17 18 21 27

WET WEIGHT 17.52 19.56 15.78 15.63 15.84

DRY WEIGHT 14.53 16.3 13.25 13.18 13.46

MOISTURE 2.99 3.26 2.53 2.45 2.38

TIN WEIGHT 1.07 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 13.46 15.24 12.18 12.1 12.4

WATER CONTENT 22.2% 21.4% 20.8% 20.2% 19.2%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 105-7B 105-8B

WET WEIGHT 25.04 24.73

DRY WEIGHT 21.72 21.42

MOISTURE 3.32 3.31

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 20.66 20.36

WATER CONTENT 16.1% 16.3%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 105-1B

WET WEIGHT 59.11

DRY WEIGHT 49.31

MOISTURE 9.8

TIN WEIGHT 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 48.25

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 20.3%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

16 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

19.7% 16.2%

3.5% 20.3%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-105

gr. SILT, some sand

Feb. 2, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 152: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 2, 2016

Hole Number SH-105

Depth: 16 ft.

Technician: RG

LL19.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 153: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 2, 2016

Hole Number SH-105

Depth: 16 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 154: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3

TIN NUMBER 106-2 106-3 106-4

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 8 7 8

WET WEIGHT 18.12 19.5 17.1

DRY WEIGHT 15.06 16.36 14.45

MOISTURE 3.06 3.14 2.65

TIN WEIGHT 1.07 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 13.99 15.3 13.39

WATER CONTENT 21.9% 20.5% 19.8%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 106-7 106-8

WET WEIGHT 34.03 31.93

DRY WEIGHT 28.32 26.64

MOISTURE 5.71 5.29

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 27.26 25.58

WATER CONTENT 20.9% 20.7%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 106-1

WET WEIGHT 63.69

DRY WEIGHT 51.84

MOISTURE 11.85

TIN WEIGHT 1.05

SOIL WEIGHT 50.79

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 23.3%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

12 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

23.8% 20.8%

3.0% 23.3%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-106

gr. br. silty SAND

Feb. 2, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 155: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 2, 2016

Hole Number SH-106

Depth: 12 ft.

Technician: RG

LL23.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 156: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 2, 2016

Hole Number SH-106

Depth: 12 ft.

Technician: RG

SOIL SAMPLE

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART

Page 157: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

PROJECT NUMBER:

HOLE NUMBER: DATE:

DEPTH: TECHNICIAN:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3

TIN NUMBER 108-2 108-3 108-4

NUMBER OF BLOWS

(LIQUID LIMIT) 7 7 10

WET WEIGHT 17.55 16.06 13.84

DRY WEIGHT 14.42 13.32 11.63

MOISTURE 3.13 2.74 2.21

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.07 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 13.36 12.25 10.57

WATER CONTENT 23.4% 22.4% 20.9%

TEST NUMBER 1 2

TIN NUMBER 108-7 108-8

WET WEIGHT 30.24 32.8

DRY WEIGHT 24.85 26.84

MOISTURE 5.39 5.96

TIN WEIGHT 1.06 1.06

SOIL WEIGHT 23.79 25.78

WATER CONTENT 22.7% 23.1%

TEST NUMBER 1

TIN NUMBER 108-1

WET WEIGHT 67.33

DRY WEIGHT 54.26

MOISTURE 13.07

TIN WEIGHT 1.07

SOIL WEIGHT 53.19

NATURAL WATER

CONTENT 24.6%

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

PLASTICITY INDEXNATURAL WATER

CONTENT

RG

LIQUID LIMIT (2 TESTS MINIMUM) ASTM D 4318

3 ft.

PLASTIC LIMIT ASTM D 4318

15.8% 22.9%

-7.1% 24.6%

ATTERBERG LIMITS131-61204-00

SH-108

br. gr. silty SAND

Feb. 3, 2016

NATURAL WATER CONTENT ASTM D 4959

Page 158: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 3, 2016

Hole Number SH-108

Depth: 3 ft.

Technician: RG

LL15.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

10 100

WA

TE

R C

ON

TE

NT

NUMBER OF BLOWS

LIQUID LIMIT DETERMINATIONSemi-Log Plot

LAB TEST DATA

BLOW COUNT = 25

BEST FIT LINE

Page 159: WSP TMEP “Enhanced FEED Study” Geotechnical Foreshore ...€¦ · correlations developed by Dr. Peter Robertson, a leading expert for the development of electronic cone penetration

Project Number: 131-61204-00

Date: Feb. 3, 2016

Hole Number SH-108

Depth: 3 ft.

Technician: RG

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

PL

AS

TIC

ITY

IN

DE

X

LIQUID LIMIT

PLASTICITY CHART