wp4 leader: institute of aviation / włodzimierz gnarowski
DESCRIPTION
EPATS Conference ILA Berlin, May 28, 2008. Missions Requirement for EPATS Aircraft. Affordable Personal Air Transport. WP4 Leader: Institute of Aviation / Włodzimierz Gnarowski Presentation: Institute of Aviation / Micha ł Pokorski. EPATS Conference ILA Berlin, May 28, 2008. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
WP4 Leader: Institute of Aviation / Włodzimierz Gnarowski
Presentation: Institute of Aviation / Michał Pokorski
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
Missions Requirement for EPATS Aircraft
Affordable Personal Air Transport
2
REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURE
Airport performances Mission requirements
- Range
- Flight levels
- Cruise speed Operating
- Life TimeRegulations
- CS-23
Rangelimits
to needs
80% runways
available
The most
favourable
flight
conditions
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
3
REFERENCE AIRCRAFT SELECTION
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
4
DESIGN
PROCESS
CESARresults
SESAR
require
men
ts
NLR
RzU
oT
IoAAnalyses
PZL
-M
PZ
L-R
z
FUTURE AIRCRAFT DESIGN: 2020
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
5
AIRCRAFT DESIGN PROCESS
Iterations
Weight Estimation
Loop
Aerodynamics Detailed
Calculations
Performance Detailed
Calculations
REQUIREMENTS+ ASSUMPTIONS
Airplane Specifications
and Performance
This is not a full conceptual design
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
6
JETS
2eng 8pax
TURBO-PROPS
2eng 8pax 2eng 19pax
PISTONS
1eng 4seat 2eng 6seat
AIRCRAFT COMPARISION: Reference vs Future
Range
full seats1000 km 500 km 2000 km 1000 km 2000 km
Speed (bl.)
km/hSimilar +11(+13)% -17 (-10)% +10(+17)% Similar
DOC
€/(pax*km)-18% -37% -23 (-32)% -12 (-15)% -24%
SFC
l/(pax*km)-20% -26% -11 (-28)% -16% -21%
2020
short (long) distance
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
7Airplanes’ features as a functions of distance
FUTURE AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE: 2020
8pax: T-Prop vs Jet
Speed: -8 (-19)%
DOC: -28 (-19)%
SFC: -39 (-34)%
Pistons T-Props Jets
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Distance [km]
V.b
lock
[km
/h]
PISTON 1eng 3pax
PISTON 2eng 4pax
T-PROP 2eng 8pax
T-PROP 2eng 19pax
JET 2eng 8pax
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Distance [km]
DO
C [E
/(p
ax*
km)]
PISTON 1eng 3pax
PISTON 2eng 4pax
T-PROP 2eng 8pax
T-PROP 2eng 19pax
JET 2eng 8pax
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Distance [km]
SF
C [l
/(p
ax*
km)]
PISTON 1eng 3pax
PISTON 2eng 4pax
T-PROP 2eng 8pax
T-PROP 2eng 19pax
JET 2eng 8pax
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
81
85
37
0
74
0
14
82
0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.001.101.201.30
DOC [E/(pax*km)]
Distance [km]Annual Utilization
[block hours]
REMARKS - OPERATING
Today Indirect Cost level: 100 % DOC
Future goal: 50 % DOC
DOCVery
Sensitiveto
UtilizationIntensity
Distance
Impact
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
9
REMARKS – AIRSPACE STRUCTURE PROPOSAL
Different airplanes – different performances – different favourable flight conditions
CurrentAirspace
Load
Economic
Parameters
Fuel
Consumption
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
10
CONCLUSIONS
1. Affordable personal air transport is REAL.
2. Aircraft fitted to needs:
• Range, speed, size, etc.
3. Operating optimization:
• High utilization intensity,
• Low indirect cost.
4. Pistons and turbo-props the most suitable.
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008
11
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention
EPATS ConferenceILA Berlin, May 28, 2008