WP3 - Proceedings

Consortium Meeting, Reggio Emilia

Doris WiederwaldPeter Wintersteller

T.3.1.1. SWOT Analysis The aim was to provide a tool for the partners to analyse strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for the local implementationsHas to be distributed to 5 stakeholders and 2 observers Short update on observer feedback,Observers: FGM Maarten van Bommelen (Project Coordinator of the BIOSIRE Project)Klagenfurt Mr.Miklin (Project Partner CEMOBIL)Checklist/ catalogue of (real) requirementsUpdate on feedback from the start up workshops

T.3.1.2. Show CasesFinalizedAvailable as download at the internal area and at the websiteCases had been imported into the Eltis databaseCases can be found over a implemented google map on the website as well

T.3.1.3. Societal Acceptance (ISOE)Aim: exploit societal acceptance, driving factors and hindrances of the implementations in interviews and focus groups Aim: 3-4 focus group discussions or interviewsDeadline: June 2011Main questions: How is zero emission mobility perceived among prospective users in the REZIPE partner citiesExpectations of trial vehicles, support schemes, purchase promotion

Input ISOE please

T.3.2.1. Planning guidelines for the implementationDocument prepared to support implementations within the REZIPE pilot regions and implementations in follower citiesThe document contains a collection of useful information to be considered for a successful implementationcomprises a summary of issues, to be considered by every team before starting their implementationsaim of the document is to give the pilot regions a checklist before they start their local workAvailable as download at the website

T.3.2.1. Planning guidelines for the implementationThe decision to prepare a checklist (and not a 50 page guideline) had been taken within the REZIPE consortium on the last meeting based on various reasons: the first one is that responsible experts working at the implementation prefer a short checklist of points to be considered during / before the implementation instead of a comprehensive document (lack of time to read through it); the second one was that it was agreed that it is not possible to provide a guideline with comprehensive information which is valid in all countries;

Task 3.2.1 Planning guidelines for implementationDocument focusing the following points:Implementation work flowmaterials and componentsVehiclesElectricityInfrastructureMobility providers

T.3.2.2. Implementation DirectoryDescribes implementations (public and internal parts) 1 page per pilot regionAvailable as download at the internal area of the websiteContent also on the website at the description of the implementation regionsUpdate of pictures, to see the implementation progress

T.3.3 Momentum building exploiting Strengths and Assets of the regionsAll PP: pls. short input on the start-up WS and the respective outcomesSummary report of all WS (by LP)Status quo?

T.3.4.1. Transferability ReportProvide a picture what may be achieved by full roll out of zero emission from renewable energy platformDescribes the possibilities and preconditions for a bigger roll out of renewable energy for zero emission mobility in CENTRAL EUROPESummarises the main enabling factorsProvide a complete picture how a joint approach may build momentum in CENTRAL EUROPEUsable in all CENTRAL EUROPE countriesWas finalised in March 2011 availabe on internal areaThanks to all for support and inputs!

T.3.4.1. Transferability ReportProvide a picture what may be achieved by full roll out of zero emission from renewable energy platformDescribes the possibilities and preconditions for a bigger roll out of renewable energy for zero emission mobility in CENTRAL EUROPE (DE, AT, PL, SK, HU, SI, IT, CZ)Summarises the main enabling factorsProvide a complete picture how a joint approach may build momentum in CENTRAL EUROPEUsable in all CENTRAL EUROPE countriesWas finalised in March 2011 availabe on internal areaThanks to all for support and inputs!

T.3.4.2. Transferability CriteriaCriteria for a bigger roll out of renewable energy for zero emission mobility in CEUS Due in March 2012, Draft will be made in next monthsConcrete criteria are defined due to experiences with demonstrators amending the transferability reportLocal setting public utilities (city owned, private)Weather (temperature, sun), air quality problemsTopography (hills)Transport system characteristics/problems (also commercial transport)Other local assets like producers..

****