wp3 interoperable datasets for nature conservation maría cabello tracasa

WP3Interoperable datasets for nature conservation

María CabelloTracasa

NATURE SDI plus kick-off meeting Genova 6-7

November 20082

Make Datasets Interoperable: Aspects

“harmonisation”

“interoperability”

“consistency”


November 20083

ObjectiveDefinition of the metadata profile and

the data model as well as the approach to multilingual and multicultural issues

Almost all the partners are involved

Expected results are the metadata profile, the datamodel and the thesaurus

Partners

Results


November 20084

Task

Task 3.1 - multicultural and multilingual issues

Task 3.2 - metadata profile

Task 3.3 - data model

Task 3.4 - procedures for metadata profile and data model implementation


November 20085

MilestonesM3.1 – Metadata profile (M16)M3.2 -NATURE-SDIplus Data Model –

first version (M16)M3.3 -NATURE-SDIplus Data Model –

final version (M19)


November 20086

Deliverables D3.1 – Report on multilingual and

multicultural issues, including a Thesaurus (M13)

D3.2 - Nature-SDIplus metadata profile (draft CEN publication) (M16)

D3.3 - Nature-SDIplus data model (first version) (M16)

D3.4 - Nature-SDIplus data model (final version) (M19)

D3.5 - Specifications for data model implementation (M16)


November 20087

Project Plan

WP3 Interoperable datasets for nature conservation

WP Leader: Tracasa

M M

3.1 Multicultural and multilingual issues

Task Leader: CNR-IMATI

3.2 Metadata profile

Task Leader: IRD

* *

3.3 Data model

Task Leader: K.U. Leuven

* * * *

3.4 Procedures for metadata profile and datamodel implementation

Task Leader: Tracasa

MonthWork-package and task

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30


November 20088

How we could measure? Indicator

no.Objective/expected result Indicator name

Expected progress

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3*

2 Data providers enlargement Data providers involved 37 >50 >70

3 Data enrichment Collected data sets >100 >125 >175

4 Country scope and data enrichment Countries offering datasets** 17 20 >24

5 Data sets compliancy with the metadata profile and data model

Data sets compliant 0% 40% 90%

6 Datasets availability through the NATURE-SDIplus portal

Datasets accessible 0% 20% 60%

7 Multilingual compliancy Languages for thesaurus 0 1 >8(**) in addition, data of Natura 2000 by the DG ENV are available for all MS

TASK 3.1 Multicultural and Multilingual Issues

Monica De MartinoIMATI-CNR


November 200810NatureSDIplus 10

Overview Objective

To bring an added value to the interoperability of data for Nature Conservation allowing a more efficient searching for data and information

Aims Investigation of language and cultural barriers to the use of

geo-information at EU level State of the art of existing multilingual/multicultural solutions Identification of a standardizes solutions for Nature

Conservation issues through a common nomenclature

Result D3.1- Report on multilingual/multicultural issues and

solutions


November 200811

Approach A multicultural approach

Thesaurus-based to define standard technological and scientific terms of geodata understandable by different user communities operating in the fields of the data themes in NATURE-SDI

Interrelation among the activities on the definition of Thesaurus (T3.1), metadata profile(T3.2) and data model (T3.3)

A multilingual approach Multilingual searching services at Geoportal level


November 200812

Approach and Application Multicultural/Multilingual aspects of the application

All the official languages of the countries involved in the project will be considered

Multilingual resources like multilingual thesauri (e.g. multilingual thesaurus GEMET, EUROVOC, AGROVOC …) and multilingual gazetteers will be investigated to facilitate the creation of metadata profile and the development of ergonomic search interfaces for data and services catalogue

Multilingual access portal to data and services (join activity with WP4) Analysis of multilingual tools available among the

consortium Investigation of available multilingual services to access the

spatial data configured according to the standards (OGC) described in the AST Position Paper in INSPIRE


November 200813

Main Activities - Results

Identification and Definition of Thesauri Multilingual/multicultural aspects related to the data themes in

NATURE-GIS

Identification of representative datasets/metadata related to the INSPIRE data themes on nature conservation in NATURE-SDI which are most used in different application domains

Identification of a set of keywords to describe the representative data in order to define a structured vocabularies

Identification/definition of a common thesaurus to support and harmonize the metadata entry

TASK 3.2 Metadata profile

Jean Christophe DesconnetsIRD - ESPACE


November 200815

Objectives Task 3.2

To provide a relevant and comprehensive description of NatureSDI+ datasets (INSPIRE compliant)

To allow discovery and use of datasets on multilingual and multicultural context

To provide data providers with recommendations and guidelines to build a NatureSDI+ compliant catalog


November 200816

Approach and Main activities Starting point

INSPIRE metadata profile defined in Implementation Rules for Metadata, based on ISO 19115/119 metadata standard

Complete metadata profle on semantic aspects(strong links with WP2 & T3.1, T3.3)

Speficy other metadata elements identified by NatureSDI+ providers to complete INSPIRE profile

Define the core elements and elements level (basic, full)

Define the integration of common vocabularies for metadata entry and it storage


November 200817

Approach and Main activities

Complete metadata profle on technical aspects(join activity with WP4)

How metadata should be formated to provide homogenous and multilingual search on

NatureSDI geoportal ?

Specify the exchange of metadata with XML ISO 19139

Technical specifications for discovery service (ie : search criteria and data type of criteria)


November 200818

Expected Results

Results

A metadata profile for NatureSDI+ datasets, compliant with INSPIRE metadata IR(IR = Implementation Rules)

Deliverable

M16 : Guidelines and recommandations for implementation of NatureSDI+ Metadata profile

TASK 3.3 Data Model

Danny VandenbrouckeDiederik Tirry

K.U.Leuven (SADL)



Overview Objective

To contribute to the development of the data specifications regarding the 4 themes covered by NaturaSDI+ and development of a data model on nature conservation

Aims Development of a common data model for the data on nature

conservation (4 themes) based on an analysis of the user needs, on what exists and INSPIRE data specs

Contribute to the testing of data specifications for the theme nature protection (theme 9, annex 1)

Contribute to the development and testing of the data specifications for the themes biogeographical region, habitats & biotopes, species distribution (themes 17-18-19, annex 3)

Result D3.3 - Nature-SDIplus data model (first version) (M16) D3.4 - Nature-SDIplus data model (final version) (M19)


November 200821

Approach Development of specifications based on the approach

proposed by INSPIRE DT DS as the basis for the development of an extended data model – Annex III

Based on the “Definition of the annex themes and scope” (D2.3)

Based on the “Generic Conceptual Model” (D2.5)Based on the “Methodology for the Development of

Data Specifications” (D2.6)Based on the “Guidelines for the Encoding Spatial

Data” (D2.7) How to collaborate with the future TWG –

Membership of the TWG (?) – Joint work sessions (?) – Own work sessions (?)

Involvement of the nature protection community (additional cases)


November 200822

Approach Testing of the status of existing data sets of the project

against data specifications proposed by the TWG – (jointly with T5.1 and closely working with CEN/NEN)

Based on the testing framework proposed by the INSPIRE DT DS

Based on a workplan of the consortium to achieve the results within due time

How to organise the testing – each partner involved in the testing performs his/her own tests, then bring the results together (?) – joint work sessions (?)

Developing a common data model (UML) – putting the pieces together (including relationships between themes)


November 200823


Identification and development Testing of the data specifications developed by the TWG

according to the proposed methodology; extensive reporting

Analysing the results of the user needs analysis and the available data sets/metadata (WP2 and T3.2)

Analysing existing data models of data sets of the partners (or parts thereof)

Elaboration of a new data model (UML); discussion with the thematic community; propose a ‘final’ version

Coordination/specific activities with the TWG (Annex 3 themes)

TASK 3.4 Procedures for metadata profile and data model implementation

María CabelloTracasa



Overview Objective

Properly deals with the procedures for the translation of available datasets into the Nature-SDIplus metadata profile and data model.

Activities Analyze of technical specifications for the data integration

and harmonization work-flows and testing of outcomes on the existing spatial datasets available from different sources

Identification of the data quality control procedures/protocols and testing on GIS data transformed according to the NATURE-SDIplus specification (Data Model)

Result Set of recommendations to facilitate the data harmonization

and onteroperability


November 200826

ApproachInterrelation with WP2

Analysing the state of the art for Nature conservation themes

Interrelation with WP3 definition of metadata profile(T3.2) and

data model (T3.3)Interrelation with WP4

Providing a guide how to proceed (work flow) for data been harmonised


November 200827

Approach and ApplicationAspects of the application

All the information of the data providers involved in the project will be considered

We will base on the state of art of the different data providers and the metadata profile and data model proposed

Data harmonization for the geoportal (join activity with WP4)


November 200828


Identification of work-flowHow to implement Nature SDIplus

metadata profileSet of recommendations for

implementing Nature SDIplus data modelGuide to provide harmonised data sets

for the Geoportal

Thank you

WP 3 Leader & T3.4 Leader www.tracasa.es

[email protected]

T3.1 Leader www.ge.imati.cnr.it

[email protected]

T3.2 Leader www.espace.ird.fr

[email protected]

T3.3 Leader www.sadl.kuleuven.be

[email protected]@sadl.kuleuven.be

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]






wp3 interoperable datasets for nature conservation maría cabello tracasa

Documents

kickoff meeting genova

data enrichmentcountries

data modeldata

interoperability of

data of natura

thesaurus018nature sdi

nature conservationwp

data modeltask leader