wp 8f workplan
DESCRIPTION
SG 8 Seminar. WP 8F Workplan. Jim Ragsdale, USA. SG 8 Seminar. WP 8F Work Flows (1):. WP 8F deliverables for WRC 07 timeframe are grouped in three high level groups: Demand: IMT.MARKET, IMT.SRVC_View Supply: IMT.METH, IMT.ESTIMATE Where: IMT.CANDI Generically known as: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (1):
• WP 8F deliverables for WRC 07 timeframe are grouped in three high level groups:
Demand: IMT.MARKET, IMT.SRVC_View
Supply: IMT.METH, IMT.ESTIMATE
Where: IMT.CANDI
• Generically known as:
What for?; How much?; Where?
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (2):
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar Original WP 8F Structure:
WP 8F Plenary
WRCSPEC
Estmt Can Freq
SERVMkt Svcs
Meth
DEVTECH
Rad_asp
SAT Coord
Ad-Hoc Migrate
Ad-Hoc Workplan
Working Groups
Ad-Hoc and Coordination Groups
Coordination with external forums (research, standards, other ITU groups, etc.)
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (3):
• WP 8F deliverables demand great interaction among Working Groups
ServicesSpectrumTechnologyWRC
• This was complicated in the original structure due to interactions among Sub-Working groups
Market, Services, MethodologyEstimate, Spectrum Bands, Frequency Arrangements, SharingRadio Aspects
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP8F Original Interactions
Jim Ragsdale, USA
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F SWG Restructure
• WP 8F at 13th meeting in Berlin restructured Sub-Working Groups
Methodology and Estimate combined and renamed SpeCalc, home is Services WG until 16th meeting, then moved to Spectrum WG
Market and Services combined, renamed Market
• Restructure smooths interactions among Sub-Working groups
Market and Service aspects in same Sub-Working Group
Methodology and initial Estimate work in same Sub-Working Group; In same Working Group as Market
Final Estimate work in WG Spectrum along with CANDI
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Deliverable Plan: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 >2010
CPM/WRC meeting <WRC CPM> WRC>
SG 8 meeting * * * * * * * *
WP 8F meeting No. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Service View Services Market
Methodology (to be moved to WG Spec in meeting #16)
Estimate (to be moved to WG
Spec in meeting #16)
Services/market aspects (SERV)
Naming Naming
WRC Preparations (WRC) CPM Text
Candidate Spectrum Mitigate
Comp Sharing UWB Survey
Spectrum (SPEC)
M.1036 Rev 2
Migrate (MIGRATE) Texts
Developing (DEV) Handbook update (if required)
SDR Radio aspects M.1079 Rev2 M.1580/1
Technology (TECH)
Trends Enhancements to IMT-2000 Annual revisions to M.1457 and, if necessary, revisions to other Recommendations on IMT -2000
IMT.RADIO and subsequent
revisions, if necessary New radio interface(s) for
systems beyond
IMT.GCS and subsequent revisions
IMT-2000 and enhancement
Development of detailed specifications for enhancements of IMT-2000
Radio interface development process
Complementary work to be performed outside ITU Systems
beyond IMT-2000
Research on new technologies Development of detailed specifications/standards
Key: WRC-07 related
deliverables
Recommendations Reports/Circulars etc.
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Deliverables:
• Planned WP8F Deliverables (WRC-07 timeframe):
Methodology (IMT.METHEstimate (IMT.ESTIMATE)Candidate Spectrum (IMT.CANDI)Radio Aspects (IMT.RAD_ASPECTS)Market (IMT.MARKET)Service View (IMT.SRVC_VIEW)Services (IMT.SRVC)Naming (IMT.NAME)Sharing StudiesSurvey (IMT.SURVEY)Revision of M.1036-2 (2500-2690 MHz addition)Software Defined Radio (IMT.SDR)Revisions to M.1457Handbook Supplement
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (1):
2005
Meeti ng Number Start End Year Location Status Comment
WP 8F 15 1 Feb 8 Feb 2005 Geneva Firm
WP 8F (selected WGs)
Working Group Meetings
6 Jun 7 Jun 2005 Canada Firm
WP 8F 16 8 Jun 15 Jun 2005 Canada Firm
WP 8F 17 12 Oct 19 Oct 2005 Finland Firm
SG 8 21 Nov 22 Nov 2005 Geneva Firm
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (2):
2006
Meeting Number Start End Year Location Status Comments
WP 8F 18 25 Jan 1 Feb 2006 [Bangkok] moved forward
WP 8F 18 8 Feb 15 Feb 2006 [Bangkok] changed
WP 8F 19 3 May 10 May
2006 [France] moved forward
(date constrained by RRC-06 dates)
WP 8F 19 17 May
24 May
2006 [France] changed
RRC-06 15 May
16 Jun 2006 Geneva Firm RRC-06
WP 8F 20 23 Aug
30 Aug
2006 [USA] Replaces Nov 06 meeting
Deadline for CPM Chapter text
~5 Sept
2006 Approximately 6 months before CPM-07
WP 8F 20 15 Nov
22 Nov
2006 [USA] changed
SG 8 7 Dec 8 Dec 2006 Geneva Firm
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (3):
2007
Meeting
Number Start End Year Location Status Comments
WP 8F 21 17 Jan 25 Jan 2007 [Geneva] Tentative
ITU CPM-07
5 Mar 16 Mar 2007 Geneva Firm
WP 8F 22 23 May
31 May 2007 [TBD] Tentative (date constrained by RA-07 & SG-8)
SG 8 25 Jun 26 Jun 2007 Geneva Tentative (date constrained by RA-07 approx 3 months prior to RA)
ITU RA-07
1 Oct 5 Oct 2007 Geneva Firm
ITU WRC-07
8 Oct 2 Nov 2007 Geneva Firm
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(1)MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY
Title Methodology
Identifier IMT.METH
Document Type Recommendation
ITU-R WP 8F Lead Group WG-SERV. Please note that this activity may be moved into WG-WRC as the WRC-07 preparations become more advanced. This should be considered later in 2004.
Sub-group chair Volker Reitz, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany e-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +49 6151 9372468
Editor Thomas Welter, Bouygues Telecom, France e-mail: [email protected]; Tel:+33 1 39454136
Focus for scope and work This document describes the methodology used to calculate the spectrum requirements for the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000 from the year 2010 onwards to fulfil the vision for the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000. It needs to be determined if a new methodology recommendation or a revision of the existing methodology ITU-R M.1390 is required. However, it is obvious that clear guidelines and a comprehensive iterative process in the development of this modified/new recommendation will be required in conjunction with the other activities such as market/services, radio and spectrum aspects. The methodology will be developed in close cooperation with all relevant working groups. This recommendation will not include values for additional spectrum requirements; these will be developed within [IMT.ESTIMATE].
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(2)
Related documents
Recommendation ITU-R M.[IMT.SPEC] Recommendation ITU-R M.1645 Recommendation ITU-R M.1390 Recommendation ITU-R M.[IMT.RAD_ASPECTS] Recommendation ITU-R M.[IMT.ESTIMATE] Report ITU-R M.[IMT.MARKET] Comment: More details need to be added according to progress of work
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (2)
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(3)
Meeting #10 (concluded) · Review and produce initial scope · Produce initial document structure · Produce workplan / milestones Meeting #11 (concluded) · Modify plan in greater detail · Modify scope and document structure · Initial development of developing guidelines for the
methodology · Initial development of methodology flow charts · Consider interrelationship with other radio systems Meeting #12 (concluded) · Finalise developing guidelines for the methodology · Determine whether a new methodology Recommendation or a
revision to the Rec. ITU-R M.1390 is necessary · Completion of basic flow chart · Preliminary view on what information on services and radio
environments is required for methodology; submission to SWG Service
· Preliminary view on what technical parameters need to be considered for the spectrum calculation methodology; submission to SWG Radio Aspects
· Determine the technical approach for the methodology to estimate future spectrum requirements.
· Identify possible work items and their influences/interactions with other groups within WP 8F
Milestones
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (3)
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(4)
Milestones Meeting #13 · Identify what technical parameters need to be considered for
developing the spectrum calculation methodology · Submission of the technical parameter requirement to SWG
Radio Aspects ·Develop initi al calculation algorithm · Consider the relationship between the methodology developed
here and Rec. ITU-R M.1391, dealing with the satellite component of IMT-2000.
Meeting #14 · Use initial set of preliminary figures from Market Report
(IMT.MARKET), Service View and Radio Aspects (IMT.RADIO) to begin to test the methodology through an iterative process
· Determine calculation algorithm · Submission of the material available on the methodology to
SWG Estimate
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (4)
Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(5)
Milestones Meeting #15 · Final adjustment of algorithm using a set of figures from
Service/Market (Service View, Report IMT.MARKET) and Radio Aspects (IMT.RADIO)
Meeting # 16 · Agreement of Methodology Recommendation · Submission of Methodology Recommendation to SWG
Estimate Meeting # 17 · Consideration of comments from application in SWG Estimate · Final approval of methodology Recommendation in WP8F and
submission to SG 8
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (5)
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
WRC-03 WRC-07WRC
Future Services / Market Analysis• Draft text for WRC-07:
• Spectrum estimate
• Candidate freq ranges
• When
• What for / name
• Methods to satisfy agenda
• Footnote text
• Pooled / shared / paired / etc. ?
Future Spectrum Calculation Methodology
Future Spectrum Estimate
Spectrum Survey
Future Technology Assumptions
Sharing Studies
WP 8F WRC preparations
WP 8F other spectrum- related activities
2.5 GHz Spectrum Plan
Radio Aspects
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Plan
Peter Scheele, Germany, for the Chairman of WP 8F