work in progress a visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6df data

37
Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data Mock catalogues from Shaun Cole, Durham Astrophysics Theory group and VIRGO consortium The surfaces shown enclose minimal spanning trees formed by a maximum percolation distance of 100 km/s and with a minimum of 50 member galaxies. The view is towards the South Celestial Pole, Northern Galactic Hemisphere to the left, Southern Galactic Hemisphere towards the right. The 6dF data (early 2005) used here is a bit thin towards the centre (i.e. towards the SCP). The images can, if necessary, be viewed in 3D with ChromoDepth spectacles. Otherwise depth can be perceived by white=near, blue=far. Tony Fairall, Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town. Feb 2006 using ‘Labyrinth’ software developed by Carl Hultquist And Samesham Perumal.

Upload: munin

Post on 03-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data Mock catalogues from Shaun Cole, Durham Astrophysics Theory group and VIRGO consortium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Work in progressA visual comparison between mock

catalogues and 6dF dataMock catalogues from Shaun Cole, Durham Astrophysics Theory group and VIRGO consortium The surfaces shown enclose minimal spanning trees formed by a maximum percolation distance of 100 km/s and with a minimum of 50 member galaxies. The view is towards the South Celestial Pole, Northern Galactic Hemisphere to the left, Southern Galactic Hemisphere towards the right. The 6dF data (early 2005) used here is a bit thin towards the centre (i.e. towards the SCP).The images can, if necessary, be viewed in 3D with ChromoDepth spectacles. Otherwise depth can be perceived by white=near, blue=far.

Tony Fairall, Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town.Feb 2006 using ‘Labyrinth’ software developed by Carl HultquistAnd Samesham [email protected]

Page 2: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

General views

Page 3: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 1 general

Page 4: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 2 general 6dF

Page 5: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 3 general 6dF

Page 6: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 4 general

Page 7: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 5 general

Page 8: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 6 general

Page 9: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 7 general

Page 10: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 8 general

Page 11: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 9 general

Page 12: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 10 general

Page 13: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Comments: The general similarity of texture speaks well for the simulations, and the differences are often more subtle than obvious. Void sizes is one discriminator, proportion of open space another.

Not knowing the parameters of the mock catalogues, I could take an unbiased view. The best match in my opinion was with Mock catalogue number 2.

Page 14: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Close-up views

Page 15: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 1 Close up 6dF

Page 16: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 2Close up

6dF

Page 17: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 3Close up 6dF

Page 18: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 4Close up

Page 19: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 5Close up

Page 20: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 6Close up

Page 21: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 7Close up

Page 22: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 8Close up

Page 23: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 9Close up

Page 24: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dFMock 10Close up

Page 25: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

In general the mock catalogues seem ‘too busy’ compared to 6dF. 6dF shows much more open space. Mock catalogue 1 seems the best fit.

Page 26: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Very close up

Page 27: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 1Very close

6dF

Page 28: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 2Very close

6dF

Page 29: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

Mock 3Very close

6dF

Page 30: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 4Very close

Page 31: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 5Very close

Page 32: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 6Very close

Page 33: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 7Very close

Page 34: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 8Very close

Page 35: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 9Very close

Page 36: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

6dF

Mock 10Very close

Page 37: Work in progress A visual comparison between mock catalogues and 6dF data

In general, the mock catalogues seem too crowded, and have far too little open spaces, compared to 6dF. The Mock catalogues suggest a fractal structure that repeats on ever smaller scales, while 6dF seems to ‘go no further’.

Best match, in my opinion, would be Mock catalogue 1.