women in a bind: the decline of marriage, markets and the state - mimi abramovitz
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Women in a Bind:The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the
State
Mimi Abramovitz
Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter,City University of New York &The Graduate Center, CUNY
July 19. 2013
The Cabell Brand Center & the Shephard Program at Washington & Lee
![Page 2: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
The Three Pillars of Women’s Economic Security
1. Marriage
2. The Market (Labor Market)3. The State (The Welfare State)
![Page 3: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Decline of Marriage Adults Married (18 yrs. +) 1960: 72% 2010: 51%
Proportion of Age 18-29: Married1960: 59% 2010: 20%
Proportion of Population: Married 1972: 10.8 per 1000 pop 2000: 8.3 per 1000 pop2011: 6.8 per 1000 pop
Source: U.S. Census (2010) America’s Families and Living Arrangements, Historical Tables Marital Status of the Population, 15 Years and Older by Sex and Race, 1950 to Present
![Page 4: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Fewer Marriages
![Page 5: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Households Headed by Married Couples
2010: 48% 2005: 51% 2000: 53%1995: 54% 1990: 56%1980: 60%1970: 70%1960: 74%
1950: 78%
Source: Census Bureau, CPS, Social & Economic Supplements
![Page 6: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
More and More Men and Women Postpone Marriage
Median Age At First Marriage:
Year Men Women 1950 24.8 22.5
1960 22.8 20.31980 24.7 22.01990 26.1 23.92000 26.8 25.12010 29.0 26.0
Source: US Census,CPS, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 2010 and earlier ; US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Vital Statistics of the United States, 1950
![Page 7: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
MARITAL STATUS of Women by Race
1960 2012
Black Women 60% 26%
White Women 67% 51%
SOURCE: US Census, American Families and Living Arrangements, Detailed Tables for Current Population Report, P20-537 T.A1 2000, 2009
![Page 8: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Men in the Labor Force (20 years +)
1948: 88.2%1960: 85.6%
1965: 84.1%
1970: 82.9%
1975: 80.4%1980: 79.4%
1985: 78.1%1990: 78.4%1995: 77.0%
2000: 76.9%
2005:75.6%
2010: 74.3% 2013: 72.7%
Source; U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statists, Household Data . Table A-1. . :
![Page 9: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
![Page 10: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Declining Male Wages and Purchasing Power
Median Weekly Wage
(Male 16 yrs. +)
Year ( Current 2012) (Inflation adjusted )
1979 $ 299 $393 2012 $ 868 $376
Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistic
![Page 11: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Dual Earner Couples
1970 2011
Percent of Dual Earner Couples
46% 60%
Wives % of Family Income
27% 40%
Wives Earned More Than Husband
18% (1987) 29%
Source: US Dept .of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Women’s Bureau,Women in the Labor
Force: A Data Book 2012.
![Page 12: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Women in the Labor Force(1948-2013)
1948: 31.1% 1960: 36.3.%1970: 43.4%1975: 45.9 %1980: 51.2%1985: 54.8%1990: 58.0%1995: 59.2 %2000: 60.8% ( peak)2005: 60.1%2010: 60.5%2013 58.7.3:
• Source: US Dept of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,, Labor Force Statistics From The Current Population Survey. Labor Force Statistics From The Current Population Survey.1948-2013.
![Page 13: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Job Loss Among WomenDuring the Economic Recovery
2009- 20135.8 million jobs
added to the private sector
Gains by GenderWomen gained 2.2 jobs
Men gained 3.6 Jobs
Source : National Women’s Law Center
![Page 14: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Declining Values of Women’s Wages and Purchasing Power
Median Weekly Wage (Female 16 yrs. +)
Year (Current) (Inflation adjusted )
1979 $ 185 $251 2012 $ 693 $301
Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistic
![Page 15: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
June 10, 1963 -President John F. KennedySigns the Equal Pay Act Into Law
Source: Brunner, Borgna, The Wage Gap :A history of Pay Inequity and the Equal pay Act.
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/equalpayact1.html
![Page 16: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Gender Wage Gap: Female to Male Wage Ratio (Full time workers)
Year F/M Earnings Ratio
1960 60.71965 59.9
1970 59.41975 58.8
1980 60.21985 64.61990 71.61995 71.42000 73.7
2005 77.02010 77.4
Source: Institute for Women’s Policy Research, #F350 (2012)
![Page 17: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Causes of Gender Wage Gap
• Wage Discrimination•
Women’s Near Exclusive Responsibit for Care Work in the Home
•Concentration of Women in Low-Paid
Women’s Jobs
![Page 18: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Wages vs Productivity 1950-2010
Source: Economic Policy Institute ,2012
![Page 20: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Poverty Rate for Women1966-2011
1966: 16.3%1970: 14.0%
1973: 12.5% ( low)1980: 14.7%1985: 15.6%1990: 15.2%1995: 15.4%2000 :12.6%2005: 14.1%2011: 16.3%
Source: US, Census Historical Poverty Tables
![Page 21: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
1970s: Slowed Economic Growth Blamed On
“Big Government”: especially the welfare state spending viewed as undercutting Private investment & increasing the debt, deficit and interest rates.
Victories of Social Movements: Empowered workers, women and persons of color which led to increased labor costs.
“Personal Irresponsibility”: Welfare State programs uncut the work ethic, heterosexual marriage and family formation.Source: Abramovitz, M. (2004)
![Page 22: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
The U- Turn in Public Pollcy
Beginning in the mid -1970s the main or overriding goal goal of U.S social
welfare policy has been to> Redistribute income upward from the have
nots ( the 99%) to the haves ( the 1%) The era of cuts backs began with President Reagan in 1980 (Reaganomics) and has persisted in varying degrees furing every Presidential Administration since then/
![Page 23: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Main Cutback Tactics-Tax Cuts
-Reduced Social Spending
-Privatization of Public Services
-Shift Federal Responsibility for social Welfare to the State
-Weaken Social Movements-Penalize “Personally Irresponsible
Behavior”Source: Abramovitz, M (2004)
![Page 24: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Spending Cuts : #1
Entitlement Spending ( % of GDP)
1983: 9.5% of GDP ( high)
2012: 8.4% of GDP
![Page 25: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
![Page 26: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Spending Cuts: #2 Discretionary Spending ( Non Defense)
Share of all Federal Spending 1962: 68% 2012: 36%
Share of GDP 1962-2012Average: 3.9%
Never Below 3.2%Projected for 2022: 2.8%
( 14% lower than lowest point in last 50 yrs)
![Page 27: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Discretionary( non Defense) Spending Levels as a Share of GDP. 1962-2022
![Page 28: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Wider Impact of Shrinking the State Strategy
• Higher Poverty Rates• Relationship Between wages & profits • Increased Inequality
![Page 29: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Higher Poverty Rates for Women 1966-2011
1966: 16.3%1970: 14.0%1973: 12.5% ( low)1980: 14.7%1985: 15.6%1990: 15.2%1995: 15.4%2000 :12.6%2005: 14.1%2011: 16.3% ( same as in 1966)
Source: US, Census Historical Poverty Tables
![Page 30: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Wages & Profits: Percentage of National Income• Year Wages Wages /Benefits Profits• 1932 59.5% 60.6% -0.4%• 1950 55.7% 58.7% 13.6%• 1965 55.7% 61.1% 13.4%• 1970 59.3% 66.3% 9.0%• 1975 56.4% 65. 6% 9.3%• 1980 56.5% 67.7% 8.2%• 1985 53.6% 65.2% 8.9%• 1990 54.1% 65.6% 8.6%• 1995 53.2% 65.0% 10.8%• 2000 54.9% 65.7% 9.3%• 2005 52.4% 65.0% 12.3%• 2010 49.8 % 62.2% 12.9%• Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. & The Economist
![Page 31: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Wages and Profits: Share of National Income 1957-2009
Source: Dept of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Affairs
![Page 32: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Income Inequality: 1967-2012
YearLowest Fifth
Second Fifth
Third Fifth
Fourth Fifth
Highest Fifth Top 5 %
2011 3.2 8.4 14.3 23 49.7 21.72005 3.4 8.6 14.6 23 50.5 22.22000 3.6 8.9 14.8 23 49.8 22.11995 3.7 9.1 15.2 23.3 48.7 211990 3.8 9.6 15.9 24 46.6 18.51985 3.9 9.8 16.2 24.4 45.6 17.61980 4.2 10.2 16.8 24.7 44.1 16.51975 4.3 10.4 17 24.7 43.6 16.51970 4.1 10.8 17.4 24.5 43.3 16.61967 4 10.8 17.3 24.2 43.6 17.2
Source : US Census
![Page 33: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Tripple Jeopardy
Women are the majority of those
1. who use government program 2. who work in government jobs
3. belong to public sector unins
![Page 34: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Women as Public Sector Workers: 2011
•Women as a % Government Workers All Government: 48%
• Federal: 43.0% State: 51.7% Local: 61.4%
![Page 35: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Job Loss by Women in Public Sector2009-2013
Jobs lost in public sector: 737,000 Jobs lost by women: 435,000*Jobs lost by men: 305, 000**
* wiped out 20% of women’s private sector job gains** wipes out 8.4% of men’s private sector job gains
• Source: National Women’s Law Center
![Page 36: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Union Membership(% of of all employed)
Public and Private Private Public 1954 :35% ( peak) 1983: 20.1% -- -- 1985: 18.0% -- -- 1990: 16.0% -- -- 1995: 14.9% -- -- 2000: 13.4% 9.0% 36.9% 2005: 12.5% 7.8% 36.5% 2010: 11.9% 6.9% 36.2%2012: 10.5% 6.6% 35.9%
Source : Bureau of Labor Statistics
![Page 37: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070301/545c3c01af7959c3098b46d2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
“First they Ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they fight you
Then you win.”
….Mahatma Ghandi 1869-1948