wipo-ukraine summer school on intellectual property: july 2011
DESCRIPTION
WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: JULY 2011. International and Regional Patent Systems. Outline. Reasons for international and regional patent systems Examples of international and regional systems The Patent Cooperation Treaty The Eurasian Patent Organisation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
International and Regional Patent Systems
WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: JULY 2011
Outline
Reasons for international and regional patent systemsExamples of international and regional systemsThe Patent Cooperation TreatyThe Eurasian Patent OrganisationThe European Patent OrganisationEuropean CommunityAfrican Regional SystemsThe Future
Reasons for international and regional patent systems
PoliticalEqual treatmentCloser cooperation
EconomicLower costs
For countriesFor applicants
AdministrativeReduces backlogsSimplifies procedures
Examples of international and regional patent systems
The Patent Cooperation TreatyThe Eurasian Patent OrganisationThe European Patent OrganisationEuropean Community DevelopmentsAfrican Regional Systems
African Regional Intellectual Property OrganisationOrganisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle
The Patent Cooperation Treaty; members - 1
Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Australia, Austria, AzerbaijanBahrain, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina , Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina FasoCameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican RepublicEcuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia
The Patent Cooperation Treaty; members - 2
Finland, France, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras, HungaryIceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, ItalyJapanKazakhstan, Kenya, KyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg
The Patent Cooperation Treaty; members - 3
Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, MozambiqueNamibia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, NorwayOmanPapua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Poland, PortugalQatarRepublic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda
The Patent Cooperation Treaty; members - 4
Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab RepublicTajikistan, Thailand, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, TurkmenistanUganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Uzbekistan1Viet NamZambia, Zimbabwe
The Patent Cooperation Treaty;an outline
1144 Member StatesInternational Phase
International searchInternational PublicationInternational Preliminary Examination
National PhaseExaminationNo examinationGranted Patents
The Patent Cooperation Treaty; International Search and Preliminary Examination Authorities
Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Finland, India, Israel, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, the United States of America, the European Patent Office, and the Nordic Patent Institute.
The Patent Cooperation Treaty – How it works
The Eurasian Patent Organisation; members
Kyrgyz RepublicRepublic of ArmeniaRepublic of AzerbaijanRepublic of BelarusRepublic of KazakhstanRepublic of MoldovaRepublic of TajikistanRussian FederationTurkmenistan
Eurasian Patent Organisation; how it works
StructureAdministrative CouncilEurasian Patent Office
Filing of Single application with Eurasian Patent OfficeInitial search by Eurasian Patent Office Substantive examination – requested 6 months after publication of search reportGrantDesignation of states in which patent is to be effectiveMaintenance in members states individually
The European Patent Organisation; Member States
The European Patent Organisation; how it works
StructureAdministrative Council
Budget and Finance CommitteePatent Law CommitteeTechnical and operational support committee
The European Patent OfficeHagueBerlinViennaMunich
The European Patent Organisation; procedures
The European Community; member states
The European Union; regional IP systems
Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal MarketSingle European trade markSingle European design
Community patentEnhanced cooperation – not Italy and SpainOptional – national and European patents continueSingle application made at EPO
Examined under European patent ConventionMade unitary patent at request of applicantsEPO collects renewal fees and conducts other maintenance functions
European Community Patent; some issues
TranslationsProceedings in EPO languages (English, French, German)No further translation at grant machine translation when neededTransitional period
Translation into English or language of member state filed by applicant but reimbursed
LitigationEuropean and EU Patents CourtFirst Instance regional and central
African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation
African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation; member states
BotswanaGambiaGhanaKenyaLesothoLiberiaMalawiMozambique
NamibiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSudan (changes)SwazilandTanzaniaUgandaZambiaZimbabwe
African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation; how it works
StructureAdministrative CouncilARIPO OfficeTraining Centre
ProcessTrade marks, patents and designsSingle applicationSearch and substantive examinationGrant
National acceptance
Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle; member states
BeninBurkino FasoCamerounCentrafiqueCongoCote d’IvoireGabon
GuineeGuinee BissauMaliMauritanieNigerSenegalTchadTogo
Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle; how it works
StructureAdministrative councilDirector generalBoard of appeals
Deals with all IP rightsEffective in all statesDecisions by court in one state apply to all
The Future
Strengthening of existing systemsPatent Prosecution Highway
Work done once is used againMutual Recognition
Grant by one leads to grant by othersThe big 5
State Intellectual Property Office (China), EPO, Korean Intellectual Property Office, Japan Patent Office, United States Patent and Trade Mark Office
An alternative to the PCT?