why spring ?

Download Why Spring ?

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: sora

Post on 18-Mar-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Why Spring ?. It is the first important biological event after shipwreck Bloom of phytoplankton in the area Spawning of many species of fishes and shellfish of commercial interest Effects on plankton ---- effects on food web. Source of Data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • THE EFFECT OF THE PRESTIGE OIL SPILL ON THE PHYTOPLANKTON IN THE N-NW SPANISH COAST DURING SPRING

    Manuel Varela*1, Antonio Bode1. M Teresa Alvarez-Ossorio1 Ricardo Anadon2, Marcos LLope 2 Luis Valdes 3 Carlos Garcia-Soto 4

    1 Instituto Espanol de Oceangrafia. Muelle de Animas s/n. A Corua. Spain

    2 Laboratorio de Ecologia. Universidad de Oviedo. Spain

    3 Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia. Paseo del Arbeyal s/n. Gijn. Spain

    4 Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Promontorio de Sa Martn s/n. Santander. Spain

  • Why Spring ?It is the first important biological event after shipwreckBloom of phytoplankton in the areaSpawning of many species of fishes and shellfish of commercial interestEffects on plankton ---- effects on food web

  • Source of DataInstituto Espaol de Oceanografia Core Project: Studies on Times Series of Oceanographic DataStarting in 1988 in A CorunaSeveral localities of study in the N-NW Coast of SpainPelacus CruisesCover the area from Portugal to FranceOmexII Satellite Data For the area in front of Rias BajasSatellite chlorophyll IEOGijon Radial

  • NGSGWBBEBBArea of study

  • Have effects on phytoplankton been observed after the Prestige oil spill during spring?Effects on biomass (chlorophyll-a)Effects on physiology (primary production)Effects of taxonomic groupsEffects on main phytoplankton species

  • Effects on biomass (chlorophyll-a)

  • Effects on biomass (chlorophyll-a)

  • Effects on primary production

  • Effects on primary production

  • Effects on diatoms

  • Effects on diatoms

  • Effects on dinoflagellates

  • Effects on dinoflagellates

  • Main phytoplankton species

    Tabla Fito Corua y Cudillero

    Table 1.- Mean (cells/mL) and standard deviation of main phytoplankton groups in a station off A Corua and Cudillero, before

    and after de accident during the period of spring bloom (February to May for A Corua; April and May for Cudillero).

    n (before): percentage of species appearance for a the total number of samples (49). n (after) the same for 4 samples

    Asterisk denotates significant differences ( p 0.5)

    A CORUABefore ( 1990-2002)After (2003)

    Groups and species%nmeansd%nmeansderror

    Dinoflagellates

    Heterocapsa niei392.03.9750.90.60.3

    Gyrodinium glaucum220.10.2750.40.30.2

    Prorocentrum balticum331.35.2504.98.46.4

    Scrippsiella trochoidea240.52.1250.10.10.0

    Torodinium roubustum330.20.3500.30.30.1

    Diatoms

    Asterionellopsis glacialis331.74.5250.20.30.2

    Chaetoceros affinis242.38.2751.41.40.9

    Chaetoceros compressus1612.970.5250.91.51.2

    Chaetoceros curvisetus1415.7104.0200.10.20.0

    Chaetoceros didymus295.115.8500.91.41.1

    Chaetoceros socialis65377.51138.17531.644.033.4

    474.314.27516.521.015.4

    Detonula pumila4313.326.3200.10.10.0

    Guinardia delicatula5113.752.31002.92.0198.6

    Guinardia striata140.31.6250.50.92.1

    Lauderia borealis205.618.8250.10.20.6

    Leptocylindrus danicus *5119.759.975151.6258.50.4

    Leptocylindrus minimus120.61.8251.62.77.2

    141.54.9500.70.9

    Nitzschia longissima511.32.5752.02.20.9

    Pseudo-nitzschia pungens5712.728.1756.39.51.5

    Pseudonitzschia delicatissima100.62.5500.81.20.7

    Skeletonema costatum3913.846.2250.10.10.4

    Thalassionema nitzschoides351.23.7751.71.20.0

    Thalassiosira fallax220.92.8501.11.6

    0.7

    Other phytoplankters1.2

    Phaeocistis pouchetii333.07.3251.83.1

    Solenicola setigera229.446.97510.617.6

    CUDILLEROBefore (1995-2002)After (2003)

    Groups and species%nmeansd%nmeansd

    Dinoflagellates

    290.40.9250.10.1

    Prorocentrum balticum *140.10.41003.22.6

    Scrippsiella trochoidea570.60.8500.20.2

    Diatoms

    Asterionellopsis glacialis140.20.7500.20.2

    141.33.3250.10.1

    Cerataulina pelagica210.31.1250.10.2

    140.20.65016.516.5

    Chaetoceros danicus290.40.9250.10.1

    7121.4437.750191.0191.0

    5711.626.7500.10.1

    Guinardia delicatula5738.3109.2250.10.1

    Leptocylindrus danicus7167.0224.810046.143.6

    Leptocylindrus minimus70.10.35024.624.6

    933.15.310093.293.1

    Rhizosolenia setigera360.41.1250.10.1

    1423.986.05012.412.4

    Tabla Fito Cudillero

    Table **** mean and standard deviation of main phytoplankton groups in a station off Cudillero, before

    and after the accident, during the period of spring bloom (april and may). n : percentage of species appearance for total number of samples.

    Before (1995-2002)After (2003)

    Groups and speciesnmeansdnmeansd

    Dinoflagellates

    290.40.900.00.0

    140.10.41003.22.6

    570.60.8500.20.2

    Diatoms

    140.20.7500.20.2

    141.33.300.00.0

    Cerataulina pelagica210.31.100.00.0

    140.20.65016.516.5

    290.40.900.00.0

    7121.4437.750191.0191.0

    5711.626.7500.10.1

    5738.3109.200.00.0

    7167.0224.810046.143.6

    70.10.35024.624.6

    933.15.310093.293.1

    360.41.100.00.0

    1423.986.05012.412.4

    Tabla Fito Pelacus

    Table 2.- Main phytoplankton species ranked by order of relative abundance during period 2000-2002 before the accident and for year 2003,

    after the accident from Pelacus Cruises. SG: Southern Galicia; NG: Northern Galicia; WBB: Western Bay of Biscay;

    EBB: Eastern Bay of Biscay.

    BeforeAfter

    Zone/Year2000200120022003

    SGLeptocylindrus danicusSkeletonema costatumAsterionellopsis glacialisCeratium furca

    Detonula pumilaThalassiosira rotulaDetonula pumila

    Guinardia delicatulaCeratium furcaChaetoceros decipiens

    Detonula pumila

    NGChaetoceros socialisBacteriastrum delicatulumThalassiosira rotulaGuinardia delicatula

    Skeletonema costatumDetonula pumilaDetonula pumila

    Guinardia delicatulaDetonula pumilaThalassionema nitzschioidesChaetoceros curvisetus

    Guinardia flaccidaChaetoceros curvisetusChaetoceros decipiens

    Thalassionema nitzschioides

    WBBGuinardia delicatulaGuinardia flaccidaDetonula pumila

    Detonula pumilaDetonula pumilaAsterionellopsis glacialisProboscia alata

    Cerataulina pelagicaCeratium furcaCeratium furca

    Cerataulina pelagicaDetonula pumila

    Thalassionema nitzschioides

    EBBGuinardia delicatulaCerataulina pelagicaDetonula pumila

    Detonula pumilaCeratium furcaProboscia alata

    Ceratium furcaLeptocylindrus danicus

    Leptocylindrus danicusCerataulina pelagicaDetonula pumila

    Tabla Zoo Todos radiales

    before and after Prestige oil spill. Asterisk denotates statistical signifficant differences p0.5

    COASTAL STATIONSVigoCoruaCudillero

    BeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter

    Acartia clausi1572 1365695 1202630 22484054 1555

    Calanus helgolandicus143 111125 19261 159253 10

    Centropages chierchiae73 10012 1535 87127 27

    Paracalanus parvus193 144641 75 *341 307111 42

    Temora longicornis236 185206 102366 461133 3852 8714 23

    SHELF STATIONSVigoCoruaCudilleroSantander

    BeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter

    Acartia clausi2363 5159290 32724 635390 131250 244451 262

    Calanus helgolandicus2086 5868136 3025 2410 8117 17187 126

    Centropages chierchiae53 7118 1962 8332 14

    Paracalanus parvus478 1113161 78458 443127 35

    Temora longicornis158 19311 1587 10219 137 104 7

    Tabla Fito Corua y Cudille (2)

    Table 1.- Mean and standard deviation of main phytoplankton groups in a station off A Corua and Cudillero, before

    and after de accident during the period of spring bloom february to may).

    n (before): percentage of species appearance for a the total number of samples (49). n (after) the same for 4 samples

    A CORUABefore ( 1990-2002)After (2003)

    Groups and speciesnmeansderrornmeansderror

    Dinoflagellates

    Heterocapsa niei392.03.90.8750.90.60.3

    Gyrodinium glaucum220.10.20.0750.40.30.2

    Prorocentrum balticum331.35.21.0504.98.46.4

    Scrippsiella trochoidea240.52.10.400.00.00.0

    Torodinium roubustum330.20.30.0500.30.30.1

    Diatoms

    Asterionellopsis glacialis331.74.50.7250.20.30.2

    Chaetoceros affinis242.38.21.6751.41.40.9

    Chaetoceros compressus1612.970.513.8250.91.51.2

    Chaetoceros curvisetus1415.7104.020.400.00.00.0

    Chaetoceros didymus295.115.81.2500.91.41.1

    Chaetoceros socialis65377.51138.1218.17531.644.033.4

    474.314.22.87516.521.015.4

    Detonula pumila4313.326.34.700.00.00.0

    Guinardia delicatula5113.752.310.21002.92.0198.6

    Guinardia striata140.31.60.3250.50.92.1

    Lauderia borealis205.618.83.600.00.00.6

    Leptocylindrus danicus5119.759.911.675151.6258.50.4

    Leptocylindrus minimus120.61.80.4251.62.77.2

    141.54.91.0500.70.9

    Nitzschia longissima511.32.50.5752.02.20.9

    Pseudo-nitzschia pungens5712.728.15.4756.39.51.5

    Pseudonitzschia delicatissima100.62.50.5500.81.20.7

    Skeletonema costatum3913.846.25.300.00.00.4

    Thalassionema nitzschoides351.23.70.7751.71.20.0

    Thalassiosira fallax220.92.80.6501.11.6

    0.7

    Other phytoplankters1.2

    Phaeocistis pouchetii333.07.31.4251.83.1

    Solenicola setigera229.446.99.27510.617.6

    CUDILLEROBefore (1995-2002)After (2003)

    Groups and speciesnmeansdnmeansd

    Dinoflagellates

    290.40.900.00.0

    Prorocentrum balticum140.10.41003.22.6

    Scrippsiella trochoidea570.60.8500.20.2

    Diatoms

    Asterionellopsis glacialis140.20.7500.20.2

    141.33.300.00.0

    Cerataulina pelagica210.31.100.00.0

    140.20.65016.516.5

    Chaetoceros danicus290.40.900.00.0

    7121.4437.750191.0191.0

    5711.626.7500.10.1

    Guinardia delicatula5738.3109.200.00.0

    Leptocylindrus danicus7167.0224.810046.143.6

    Leptocylindrus minimus70.10.35024.624.6

    933.15.310093.293.1

    Rhizosolenia setigera360.41.100.00.0

    1423.986.05012.412.4

    Tabla Fito Pelacus (2)

    Table 2.- Main phytoplankton species ranked by order of relative abundance during period 2000-2002 before the accident and for year 2003,

    after the accident from Pelacus Cruises. SG: Southern Galicia; NG: Northern Galicia; WBB: Western Bay of Biscay;

    EBB: Eastern Bay of Biscay.

    BeforeAfter

    Zone/Year2000200120022003

    SGLeptocylindrus danicusSkeletonema costatumAsterionellopsis glacialisCeratium furca

    Detonula pumilaThalassiosira rotulaDetonula pumila

    Guinardia delicatulaCeratium furcaChaetoceros decipiensPlanktoniella sol

    Detonula pumila

    NGChaetoceros socialisBacteriastrum delicatulumThalassiosira rotulaGuinardia delicatula

    Skeletonema costatumDetonula pumilaDetonula pumila

    Guinardia delicatulaDetonula pumilaPlanktoniella solCeratium furca

    Guinardia flaccidaThalassionema nitzschioidesChaetoceros curvisetus

    Chaetoceros curvisetusChaetoceros decipiens

    Planktoniella sol

    Thalassionema nitzschioides

    WBBGuinardia delicatulaGuinardia flaccidaDetonula pumila

    Detonula pumilaDetonula pumilaAsterionellopsis glacialisProboscia alata

    Cerataulina pelagicaThalassionema frauenfeldiiCeratium furca

    Ceratium furcaDetonula pumila

    Cerataulina pelagica

    Thalassionema nitzschioides

    Planktoniella sol

    EBBGuinardia delicatulaCerataulina pelagicaDetonula pumila

    Detonula pumilaCeratium furcaProboscia alata

    Ceratium furcaLeptocylindrus danicus

    Leptocylindrus danicusCerataulina pelagicaDetonula pumila

    Guinardia flaccida

  • Effects on biomass during Pelacus CruisesBf: 1999-2002Af: 2003

  • Effects on primary production OMEX II Box Area

  • Radial Gijon. Instituto Espaol de Oceanografia

  • Final RemarksNo effects on phytoplankton at several levelsDifferences are the result of natural variabiliy of ecosystem

  • Why effects have not been observed?

  • Low solubility of Prestige fuelLow concetrations in waterLow concentations in planktonLow aromatic contentHigh density--sinkingPristane/Phytane ratio no Prestige

  • Plankton mechanisms remove oil from surface watersZooplankton: grazing on oil particlesFecal pellets sinking to bottomDiatoms: adsorption on silica wall eventual sinking to bottom

    Detritus and clay particles: adsorptionAggregates and eventual sinking

  • A Coruna Zooplankton: oil in the gut content

  • CONCLUSIONSNo effects have been observed on phytoplankton during spring blooms for biomass, production and community structureWe can not ascertain whether or not oil has affected phytoplanktonLarge variability caused by meso and large-scale processes masks any effectEffects reduced or short-lived. No effect on spring bloom

  • AcknowledgementsTechnical assistanceTeodoro Patrocinio IbarrolaJorge Lorenzo SalamancaLeticia Viesca Lombardia

    Crew of R/VIEO (Lura, Rioja, Navaz)IFREMER (Thalassa)

    ProjectsCICYT Aes: Reconocimiento Oceanografico en la poca de floracin primaveral en Galicia y CantbricoIEO: Studies on Time Series of Oceanographic DataEU: Pelasses and Sardyn