who needs ipv6...in the pacific?

25
Issue Date: Revision: Who needs IPv6 …in the Pacific? PITA 20 th AGM & Annual Telecommunications Conference April 2016 Paul Wilson Director General

Upload: apnic

Post on 16-Apr-2017

650 views

Category:

Internet


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Issue Date:

Revision:

Who needs IPv6…in the Pacific?

PITA 20th AGM & Annual Telecommunications Conference

April 2016

Paul WilsonDirector General

Page 2: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Coming up…

• IPv6 growth update• IPv6 in the Pacific• IPv6 drivers: access and content• Status of Pacific nations

Page 3: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Global IPv6 users (Google)

11% in April 2016

Page 4: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Global IPv6 capability (APNIC)

5.5% in April 2016

Page 5: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

National* IPv6 capability

US29%

PE19% AU

3%

GR24%

BE51%

JP15%

* average

Page 6: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Major ISPs – Examples

CC ASN AS Name Capable

BE AS6848 TELENET-AS Telenet N.V. 70.73%

BE AS12392 ASBRUTELE Brutele SC 70.59%

US AS7922 COMCAST-7922 - Comcast Cable 60.01%

US AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT Services, Inc. 78.04%

US AS22394 CELLCO - Verizon Wireless 89.88%

US AS21928 T-MOBILE-AS21928 - T-Mobile USA, Inc. 45.36%

US AS701 UUNET – MCI Inc. dba Verizon Business 0.20%

AU AS1221 ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd 8.52%

Page 7: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Internet challenges in the Pacific

• Geography and distance

• High bandwidth costs

• Low penetration

• Lack of competition

• Critical mass

• Human capacity building

• What about IPv6?

Page 8: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Why are we waiting…?

Some frequent answers…

• We have more IPv4 addresses than we need

• We have more IPv4 addresses than people!

• Our content is offshore, in the cloud, etc.

• IPv4 works well enough

• OK, but things are changing…

Page 9: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

IPv4 addresses per person

AS CK FJ FM GU KI MH MP NC NR NU PF PG PW SB TK TO TV VU WF WS0

0.5

1

1.5

Page 10: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Drivers: Network Access

• Without IPv6 (IPv4 only)– New deployments must use NAT (eg mobile)– Carrier Grade NAT is expensive– Increasing costs: x users x bandwidth

• With IPv6 (dual stack)– Addresses for every device– Offload traffic from NATs– Competitive advantage– IPv4 is eventually irrelevant, no more NAT– LTE can use IPv6 immediately– Also: “Internet of Things”

Page 11: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Drivers: Content and Services

• Without IPv6 (IPv4 only)– Degrading customer/client experience– Mobile users at particular disadvantage (all NAT)

• With IPv6 (dual stack)– Direct connection to all customers– Best performance for all– Better user experience, competitive advantage (esp mobile)

• Offshore / hosted / cloud– Same situation applies

• Onshore– Beware tunneled IPv6 connectivity (over IPv4)

Page 12: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

IPv6 addresses per person (/64)

AS CK FJ FM GU KI MH MP NC NR NU PF PG PW SB TK TO TV VU WF WS0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000⬆︎⬆︎

Page 13: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Australia (.AU)24,244,056 people21,068,084 users

87% penetration1,941 ASes

IPv448,613,120 addresses

2.01 per head87% visible1197 ASes

IPv63.44% capability

37,735,639 M addresses1,556,490 per head

47% visible249 ASes

Page 14: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

New Zealand (.NZ)4,558,155 people3,947,362 users

87% penetration520 ASes

IPv46,849,536 addresses

1.50 per head78% visible322 ASes

IPv62.72% capability

854,704 M addresses187,511 per head

21% visible108 ASes

Page 15: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Vanuatu (.VU)269,354 people

30,437 users11% penetration

10 ASes

IPv415,616 addresses

0.06 per head95% visible

5 ASes

IPv60.06% capability8,590 M addresses

31,891 per head1% visible

2 ASes

Page 16: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Guam (.GU)171,670 people112,272 users

65% penetration8 ASes

IPv4218,624 addresses

1.27 per head98% visible

5 ASes

IPv60.03% capability25,769 M addresses

150,112 per head17% visible

1 AS

Page 17: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

New Caledonia (.NC)265,796 people175,425 users

66% penetration10 ASes

IPv4160,768 addresses

0.60 per head97% visible

9 ASes

IPv60.02% capability34,359 M addresses

129,271 per head25% visible

7 ASes

Page 18: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

French Polynesia (.PF)285,165 people161,973 users

57% penetration4 ASes

IPv461,952 addresses

0.22 per head98% visible

3 ASes

IPv60.01% capability17,179 M addresses60,245 per head

0% visible2 ASes

Page 19: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Papua New Guinea (.PG)7,746,045 people

503,492 users6% penetration11 ASes

IPv456,576 addresses

0.01 per head90% visible

8 ASes

IPv60.01% capability30,064 M addresses3,881 per head

0% visible1 AS

Page 20: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Fiji (.FJ)896,503 people332,602 users

37% penetration7 ASes

IPv4141,568 addresses

0.16 per head100% visible

6 ASes

IPv60.00% capability30,064 M addresses33,535 per head

29% visible5 ASes

Page 21: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Fiji (.FJ) 2015

Page 22: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

APNIC Development ProgrammeCapacity Building

• Face-to-face workshops

• Virtual Lab

• eLearning

• Fellowships

Technical Assistance

• IPv6 Deployment Planning

• IXP Operation and Support

• Routing Architecture

• CERT startup and operation

Page 23: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

23

You’re Invited!

Coming events in the Pacific

25-27 April – IPv6 Workshop – Nouméa, NC 28-29 April – Intro to MPLS – Nouméa, NC 16-18 May – IPv6 Workshop – Port Vila, VU 4-8 July – PACNOG 19 – Port Moresby, PG

Plus: APNIC eLearning every Wednesday

https://training.apnic.net/

https://conference.apnic.net

Page 24: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Thank you, and…[email protected]

Page 25: Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?

Happy Birthday

PITA !