water well integrity-coal mine - osmre.gov · comparative study of domestic water well integrity to...

272
Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. 6020 Academy NE, Suite 100 • Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

Upload: hoangthuan

Post on 02-Sep-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Comparative Study of Domestic

Water Well Integrity to

Coal Mine Blasting

Summary Report

Prepared for

June 28, 2002

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. 6020 Academy NE, Suite 100 • Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

Page 2: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table of Contents

Section Page

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1

2. Occurrence of Groundwater ................................................................................................. 2

3. Site Selection and Descriptions ............................................................................................ 4

4. Monitoring Methods and Training ....................................................................................... 10 4.1 Domestic Well Water Quality Monitoring ..................................................................... 11 4.2 Domestic Well Yield and Discharge Monitoring ........................................................... 12 4.3 Vibration Monitoring .................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Training ....................................................................................................................... 15

5. Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Vibration Data from Blasting ........................................................................................ 17 5.2 Water Quality and Well Yield Data .............................................................................. 20

6. Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................. 27

References ............................................................................................................................... 28

List of Figures

Figure Page

1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 5

2 Typical Terrain at Investigation Sites ............................................................................... 7

3 Typical Blasting Activities ................................................................................................ 8

4 Typical Mining Scenario .................................................................................................. 9

5 Transducer Placements ................................................................................................. 14

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc

Page 3: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

List of Tables

Table Page

1 Monitor Well Identifiers .................................................................................................... 6

2 Quarterly Monitoring Activities in Virginia, Kentucky, and West Virginia ........................ 18

3 Water Quality Sample Inventory .................................................................................... 21

4 Results of Laboratory Water Quality Analyses, Initial Quarterly Monitoring Event.. ........ 22

5 Results of Field Turbidity Monitoring .............................................................................. 24

List of Appendices

Appendix

A Vibration Monitoring Methods and Results

B Laboratory Analysis Results

C Graphs of Quarterly Monitoring Data

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6·2002\0SMStudyTF ~628.doc ii

Page 4: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

1. Introduction

The Appalachian coal region in the southeastern portion of the United States has been an

important source of coal since it was first mined in the mid-1800s. Even after extensive mining,

this region today still accounts for approximately 40 percent of total U.S. coal production

(USGS, 1999). Surface coal mining is an important economic resource for residents of the

Appalachian region and an important source of energy for the United States. However, many

people living close to active mining operations believe that mining activities, such as blasting to

remove overburden, adversely affect their well's yield and water quality.

To date, few studies have been performed looking at the possible effects of mining on domestic

well water quality and quantity. Accordingly, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and

Enforcement (OSMRE) contracted with Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (DBS&A) to

design and initiate a long-term study to investigate whether coal mining operations located close

to domestic wells have caused or will contribute to the loss, diminution, or degradation of

groundwater supplies and/or negatively affect domestic wells and their ability to supply water.

The scope of work for this study included:

• Selecting suitable sites

• Equipping the selected wells with monitoring instruments

• Collecting data during an initial monitoring period

• Training state employees to collect monitoring data during the study

To ascertain the induced effects of blasting and pumping vibrations from nearby coal mining

sites on domestic well integrity, water quality/chemistry, and well yield, DBS&A designed and

initiated a quarterly monitoring program for domestic wells located near active mining operations

in a tri-state (Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky) area. Following a discussion of

groundwater conditions in the study areas (Section 2), this report describes the monitoring

program, including site selection and descriptions (Section 3) and monitoring methods used

(Section 4). The results obtained over the year of monitoring are discussed in Section 5.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _62B.doc

Page 5: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

2. Occurrence of Groundwater

Groundwater in Appalachian coal country is obtained from sedimentary rocks, glacial deposits,

and alluvial fill. Most of the groundwater found in the sedimentary, coal-bearing rocks occurs in

nearly vertical fractures and joints and along bedding planes. Some of these fractures are

undoubtedly tectonic in origin and exhibit a regional pattern, but most of the fractures are more

localized in nature and are the result of lateral stress relief associated with natural topographic

development. The fractures tend to form networks that exhibit some of the characteristics of a

water table aquifer, including:

• Water levels that respond to rainfall within 24 hours

• Water levels that do not respond to changes in atmospheric pressure

• Pumping rates (during pump tests} that decrease as the drawdown increases even

though the power supply remains constant

A fracture system may not have a large lateral extent, but may form small sub-systems. In a

study looking at blasting effects on groundwater supplies in Appalachia, Robertson et al. (1980}

found that during pump tests, wells located 35 to 65 feet from the pumped wells exhibited more

drawdown than observation wells only 10 feet away, while in other wells, no response to

pumping was observed.

Coal-bearing strata found throughout the Pennsylvanian and Permian strata are very brittle and

have a low tensile strength and, therefore, extensive vertical fracturing. Coal seams may act as

conduits through which water from the overlying units can move downward to deeper units

(Robertson et al., 1980}. Groundwater is often associated with coal seams because (1} the high

degree of fracturing in these strata increases the chances that water will move vertically from

the surface to depth and (2} coal seams are often underlain by low-permeability plastic clays,

causing groundwater to perch in the coal strata.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 2

Page 6: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Wells constructed in Appalachia for industrial and municipal purposes may provide large yields,

but domestic wells commonly have yields of 1 gallon per minute or less. This is due to many

factors, including:

• Well locations selected based on convenience of access and proximity to the residential

dwelling it will serve rather than sound geologic evidence

• Poor design, construction, and completion

• Inadequate formation transmissivity

• Inadequate well maintenance

Wells in the hollow valleys generally produce more water than those located near the tops of the

hill. This is because the water table tends to mimic local topography, with recharge areas at the

high points and groundwater moving toward discharge points in the valley (Robertson et al.,

1980).

Groundwater in Appalachia tends to be high in manganese and iron and often exceeds

regulatory limits for turbidity. Often, water in wells has higher dissolved oxygen than formation

water, resulting in a reddish tint as ferrous iron is oxidized in the well. lron~consuming bacteria

may also be found in well water and, if so, contribute to the reddish color and unpleasant odor.

The pH of the groundwater is relatively neutral, ranging between 6 and 8 (Robertson et al.,

1980).

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudy TF _628.doc 3

Page 7: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

3. Site Selection and Descriptions

The domestic wells used in this study were selected by Office of Surface Mining (OSM) officials,

with input by Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky state officials based upon current and past

complaint information. To identify suitable sites that meet the study criteria, state

representatives were to review sites and:

• Identify mine sites that would be blasting at least once a day

• Contact the individual coal mines to determine their blasting schedules.

• Find at least one, and preferably two, domestic well near each mine.

• Contact with the owners of the domestic wells to request and secure their participation in

the study.

• Complete a nomination package that provides the location of the well site, the five most

recent blast logs with plotted blast locations, pictures of the well installation, any

technical reports done on the site, and anticipated dates of blasting near the wells.

Based on the nomination packages provided by the state representatives, five mine sites were

selected for this study: one site in Virginia and two sites each in Kentucky and West Virginia

(Figure 1, Table 1 ). At each of the sites in Kentucky and West Virginia, at least two domestic

wells were selected for monitoring after OSM officials secured right-of-entry agreements from

the individual homeowners. Only one domestic well suitable for this study was identified at the

Virginia site. The wells selected represent a range of well construction types and proximity to

surface coal mining operations. The ages of the wells were not determined, but it is assumed

that the wells were completed when the homes were first occupied.

Blasting had been occurring near all of the sites for a significant time prior to the arrival of

monitoring personnel and the installation of monitoring equipment. The data collected represent

only a small amount of time compared to the total amount of time the well has been within the

range of influence of an active mining/blasting operation.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 4

Page 8: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

:s II

tJ w

~ a. • N

Explanation KY-1 Site ID

• Cities 0 20 Miles ~~~

0 Towns N. Major roads Map Area

OSM WELL STUDY

Study Area Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.--------------~-~ 4-22-02 7:53AM JN 9290 Figure 1

1\1 Other highways County boundaries

Page 9: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 1. Monitor Well Identifiers

State County Site ID WeiiiD Well owner

Virginia Wise VA-1 Well-1 Hylton

Kentucky Letcher KY-1 Well-1 Banks Well-2 Ratliff

Perry KY-2 Well-1 G. Hurley

Well-2 Sumner

Well-3 A. Hurley

West Virginia Mingo WV-1 Well-1 L. Dean Sr.

Well-2 L. Dean Jr. WV-2 Well-1 G. Abbott

Well-2 D. Abbott

The study sites were typical of Appalachian coal country, where residents live within hollows

below coal outcrops, which generally exist where the slopes are steepest. Within the hollows,

residential sites are typically founded on valley alluvial fills and glacial deposits comprising

cobbles, gravels, and sands with some clay. Wells can penetrate sandstone formations that

may be recharged by water moving through naturally occurring fractures in the upper elevation

coal seams and porous rock units.

The domestic water wells at all the study sites are drilled within hollows at elevations far below

mining activity. The photographs in Figure 2 show the typical terrain at all the sites investigated.

Mining activity takes place beyond the ridgeline (shown at the top of each photograph) at the

head of the hollow in which the houses are located. The ridgeline between the head of the

hollow and the mining operations is formed of overburden fill (waste rock). Blasting activities

take place within sandstone and shale formations along mountain contours and across the

mountaintop (full mountaintop removal) (Figure 3). Rock blasting along contours produces

blasting bench faces directed away from the hollow (Figure 4) or toward the hollow. At the

Virginia study site, mountaintop removal has left a pinnacle of rock that rises above the

surrounding mining operations upslope and below the waste rock ridgeline (Figure 3a). A

typical mining scenario encountered at each site is shown in Figure 4.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _62B.doc 6

Page 10: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2a. View of a hollow in Kentucky.

2b. View of a hollow in West Virginia.

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

OSM WELL STUDY

Typical Terrain at Investigation Sites Figure 2

Page 11: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-------------------------------------------·-------·------·--- --- ·· · - ·-

3a. Final stages of mountain top removal in Virginia.

3c. Mountain top blasting in Perry County, Kentucky.

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

3b. Contouring overburden blasting in Perry County, Kentucky.

3d. Contour blasting at a mine in Letcher County, Kentucky.

OSM WELL STUDY

Typical Blasting Activities Figure 3

Page 12: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

mountain top blasting

• Blast site

D Rldgeline

D Mountain top

I Head of hollow domestic water well

OSM WELL STUDY

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. _________ _:T~y~p:i~c~a~I~M~in~in~g~S~c~e~n~a~ri~o~ Figure 4

Page 13: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

4. Monitoring Methods and Training

Upon completion of site selection, collection of field data began. Fieldwork and instrumentation

was conducted in two phases. Phase I took place during a three~week period in the Faii~Winter

2000 season and involved an intensive commitment to field instrument installation and data

collection over four consecutive days of blasting at each site. Phase II involved the collection of

data during the subsequent three seasons.

During Phase I, prior to the start of monitoring at each site, representatives of DBS&A and

Aimone~Martin Associates (subcontractor to the project) met with mining operations personnel

to obtain blasting information and general information on the anticipated locations of blasting

during the monitoring phase. Representatives of DBS&A and Aimone~Martin Associates also

visited individual homeowners to assess the nature of complaints regarding well responses to

blasts and pumping vibrations (if any), to obtain previous water quality data for the domestic

wells (if available), and to obtain well construction details (if available).

Following the initial meetings, a DBS&A hydrogeologist accessed the domestic wells at the sites

to equip them with continuous water quality and well yield monitoring instrumentation. All

instrumentation (seismic, water quality, and well yield monitoring instruments) was calibrated,

tested, and quality~control checked prior to installation and the initiation of monitoring. During

the Faii~Winter 2000 four~day monitoring event, DBS&A personnel measured turbidity and well

yield, collected groundwater samples for laboratory analysis, and collected and analyzed data

from the field instruments. In addition, state personnel were trained in the use of field data

acquisition systems and retrieval of data so that they could collect data during subsequent

monitoring events.

Each state agency assigned an employee to perform the following activities:

• Contacting mine officials and well owners and coordinating blasting and monitoring

efforts at each site

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 1 0

Page 14: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

• Field calibrating, testing, and installing the monitoring instruments

• Initiating continuous monitoring at each site (well yield, water quality, and vibration)

during the monitoring period

• Collecting pre~ and post~ blast turbidity readings at a point between the well and the

pressure tank of each residence with the use of a portable turbidimeter

• Downloading all water quality, well yield, and vibration data from dataloggers and

transferring the data to DBS&A and Aimone~Martin Associates

• Removing all instrumentation from the well sites and preparing them for storage or

shipment to DBS&A or the next monitoring site

Specific methods for each of the types of monitoring are described in Sections 4.1 through 4.3.

The training conducted for state personnel is described in Section 4.4.

4.1 Domestic Well Water Quality Monitoring

The water quality of the individual domestic wells was evaluated using both field monitoring

equipment and laboratory analysis. Field water quality monitoring was conducted prior to,

during, and after a series of blasts at the five study sites.

Field water quality monitoring was conducted using electronic sensors (EC~Campbell Scientific

CSI~247, pH~Innovative Sensors M11) connected to a Campbell Scientific 21X datalogger. The

datalogger allowed for automated measurement at a frequency of the operator's discretion. The

sensors (temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity [EC]) were installed in each well below the

water level. If it was not possible to place the sensors in a particular well, they were inserted in

a flow~through cell extending from a discharge line between the well and the pressure tank at

the ground surface. Additionally, the turbidity of the domestic well water was measured at the

surface using a Hach 21 OOP portable turbidimeter.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 11

Page 15: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

During the initial monitoring period (Fall-Winter 2000}, water quality samples were collected

from each of the individual domestic wells for laboratory analysis of total aluminum, iron,

manganese, sulfate, total dissolved solids, and total suspended solids (TSS}. At each well,

samples were collected from faucets connected to the pressure tanks. The water quality

samples were collected in laboratory-supplied containers, immediately preserved on ice in an

insulated cooler with full chain-of-custody documentation, and shipped to Inter-Mountain

Laboratories, Inc. in Farmington, New Mexico for analysis. A duplicate sample analysis was

conducted at the KY -1 Well-2 site.

4.2 Domestic Well Yield and Discharge Monitoring

In order to determine the effects of mine blasting on the normal usage of the individual study

wells, DBS&A and state personnel monitored variations in well yield by continuously monitoring

volumetric flow and water level in the individual domestic wells before, during, and after blasting

events. For the purposes of this study, well yield is defined as the volumetric flow rate of water

from the well during a pumping cycle. Monitoring of well yield helps determine whether blasting

affects the ability of a well to produce water at a reliable rate. A decrease in well yield could be

due to blasting or other causes such as compaction of the material surrounding the well,

changes in the fracture size or occurrence, deterioration of the well due to age, improper

maintenance, and/or biological or mineral fouling. In order for this study to identify changes due

to blasting, an acute change would have to be associated to a blast during a monitoring event.

Well yield was monitored using a Controlotron 101 On flow meter installed on the pipe between

the well and the pressure tank. The Controlotron is equipped with an internal datalogger that

was programmed to record data at approximately the same interval as that of the Campbell

equipment (Section 4.1}. Wells were also equipped with water level sensors (Druck 150 psi

pressure transducers} connected to a Campbell Scientific 21 X datalogger to record water levels

(pressure head} within the wells at specified time intervals.

Continuous measurements of well yield and water levels were obtained for a period beginning

one day prior to blasting and ending approximately one day following the tests. The durations of

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\FinaL6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 12

Page 16: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

the pre- and post-blast monitoring periods were adjusted slightly, depending on the degree of

water level fluctuations observed in each well.

4.3 Vibration Monitoring

Ground motions adjacent to nine domestic water wells (ten during the initial monitoring period)

were recorded during blasting events to determine the ground motion variation with depth below

the ground surface. At each well selected for study, one tri-axial transducer was buried 0.42

foot from the surface near each wellhead. A second transducer was buried at depth, as outlined

below:

• At three sites the second transducer was placed at depths between 9 and 20 feet in

either an abandoned well casings (two sites) or a hand-dug well (one site).

• At four sites, an attempt was made to hand-dig holes as deep as possible to record

ground motions. At most of these sites, however, the subsurface soils contained large

gravels and cobbles, making it difficult to dig holes deeper than 3.5 feet from the surface.

• At two sites, it was not possible to dig into the ground any deeper than 0.42 foot from the

surface. Therefore, no second transducer was used at these sites.

Figure 5 shows the locations of transducers placed in or adjacent to wells. Transducers placed

in abandoned wells were either grouted in place or encapsulated in crushed stone. Those

placed within the ground adjacent to wells were tamped with pressure to ensure good coupling.

Blasting-type seismographs manufactured by LARCOR of Dallas, Texas were used to monitor

ground motions near wells. Sensors were embedded in epoxy within a watertight housing for

long-term survivability. The sensors were attached to the housing using 50-foot cables aligned

with the vertical transducer for ease of inserting at depth. Airblast was recorded using the

surface seismograph.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6·2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 13

Page 17: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

KY-1 KY-2

VA-1

well1 well2 well1 well2 - ~ ~ ~ ~

•• 0.42 ft. •• 0.42 ft. •• Sin. •• 0.42 ft. •• 0.42 ft .

• 1 1.1 ft. • 2.4 ft . • 1 3.5 ft.

• 9.5ft.

.... - ... ... -

WV-2 WV-1

well1 well2 well1 well2 - .... .... •• 0.42 ft.

-• .. 0.42ft. •• 0.42ft. •• 0.42 ft .

• 2ft.

• 1 9ft .

...

.... - 20ft. 1 - ....

OSM WELL STUDY

Transducer Locations within or

---~Dank/ B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. Adjacent to Wells

5-29-02 J N 9290 Figure 5

Page 18: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

The following settings were used:

• Ground trigger level 0.02 inch per second (ips)

• Air trigger level 125 decibels (dB)

• Sample rate 1248 samples per second

• Record length 5 to 1 0 seconds

• Range 2.5 ips

• Lowest velocity detected 0.005 ips

4.4 Training

During the initial Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring period, the following state personnel from

Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia were trained by DBS&A personnel to conduct the

remaining three seasons of monitoring for the OSM well study:

• Leslie Bright, a geologist with the Division of Mined Land Reclamation, Department of

Mines Mineral and Energy in Virginia

• Darcy White, Assistant Chief with the Office of Explosives and Blasting in West Virginia

• Ralph King, a Staff Scientist Ill with the Office of Surface Mining in Kentucky

These personnel were trained in the following tasks:

• Programming and data collection using the Campbell Scientific 21 X datalogger and a

laptop computer

• Wiring, calibrating, installing, and maintaining the Innovative Sensors M11 downhole pH

sensor

P;\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6·2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 15

Page 19: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

• Wiring, calibrating, installing, and maintaining the Campbell Scientific CSI-247 downhole

EC sensor

• Wiring and placement of the two Druck pressure transducers

• Calibrating and using the HACH 21 OOp turbidimeter

• Installing, programming, and collecting data from the Controlotron 101 On flow meter

• Using and calibrating the YSI-63 handheld pH, specific conductance, and temperature

meter

Where applicable, the personnel were also trained in special procedures required at some of the

sites (i.e., flow-through setups at the VA-1 Well-1 and KY-2 Well-2 locations).

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\FinaL6-2002\0SMStudy TF ~628.doc 16

Page 20: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

5. Results

During each of the monitoring events, field personnel attempted to collect all three categories of

data, including vibration/blasting data, water quality data, and well yield data. Throughout the

study, wells were dropped from the monitoring program for various reasons. For example, the

Kentucky sites were flooded before the second monitoring event, compromising the wells. The

West Virginia sites were not monitored during the fourth quarter because blasting activities

occurred too far from the well sites, and the Virginia site was dropped prior to the third

monitoring event for the same reason, as well as discontinued use of the well due to hookup of

the residence to a municipal water supply. Further details regarding the reasons for removing

wells from the study are outlined in Table 2.

5.1 Vibration Data from Blasting

Ground motions adjacent to nine domestic water wells were recorded during blasting events to

determine the ground motion variation with depth below the ground surface. Full waveform

vibration data and summary tables are shown in Appendix A for all blast events that were

recorded.

Detailed blasting records were available only during the Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring period.

Hence, this data set is the most complete, with 54 shots recorded at nine wells. As the study

continued mine blasting was being conducted at farther distances from the wells, and as a

result, many mine blasts did not trigger the seismographs.

The maximum ground motion recorded during the study was 0.125 ips. The Fall-Winter 2000

data set shows average near-surface (0.42 foot) and at depth (from 1.1 to 20 feet) peak particle

velocities (PPV) of 0.043 ips and 0.033 ips, respectively. In the Spring of 2001 as mining

progressed away from the well site, the average PPV values decreased to 0.038 ips and 0.029

ips for the near-surface and at depth locations, respectively. In the Fall of 2001 ground motion

was measured at the surface only and averaged 0.026 ips. In no case did the average ground

motions at depth exceed those measured at the surface.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-200210SMStudyTF _628.doc 17

Page 21: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 2. Quarterly Monitoring Activities in Virginia, Kentucky, and West Virginia

Fall-Winter State Site ID WeiiiD 2000

Virginia VA-1 Well-1 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

Kentucky KY-1 Well-1 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

Well-2 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

KY-2 Well-1 v

Well-2 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

Well-3 FWQ,WY, LWQ

West Virginia WV-1 Well-1 FWQ, WY, LWQ,V

Well-2 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

WV-2 Well-1 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

Well-2 FWQ,WY, LWQ,V

FWQ =Downhole field water quality parameter monitoring WY =Well yield monitoring

P:\9290\S ummaryRpt.4-2002\Final.6-2002\ T2_MtrgActv .cklc

Monitoring Performed

Spring Fall Winter 2001 2001 2001

FWQ,WY --- ---

--- --- ---

--- --- ---

--- --- ---

FWQ v ---

FWQ v ---

FWQ, WY, V --- FWQ

FWQ,WY, V --- FWQ,V

FWQ,V WY ---

FWQ,WY,V --- ---

LWQ =Laboratory water quality monitoring V =Vibration monitoring

Comments

Resident on city water (third quarter) and no longer using well; dropped from study

No access to wells due to flooding from sediment pond overflow (second quarter); site dropped from study

No access to wells due to flooding from sediment pond overflow (second quarter); site dropped from study

Well used only for vibration monitoring during initial monitoring period (well was dry).

Data not received (third quarter); residents refused access (fourth quarter)

Data not received (third quarter); residents refused access (fourth quarter)

West Virginia state personnel not on-site to supervise monitoring (third quarter)

West Virginia state personnel not on-site to supervise monitoring (third quarter)

West Virginia state personnel not on-site to supervise monitoring (third quarter); blasting took place too far away from site (fourth quarter)

West Virginia state personnel not on-site to supervise monitoring (third quarter); blasting took place too far away from site (fourth quarter)

=No monitoring conducted; see Comments column for explanation

Page 22: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Frequencies at the PPV also tended to decrease with depth as the degree of confinement

increased. Similarly, average frequencies decreased with successive monitoring periods. The

average frequencies near the ground surface and at depth in 2000 were 17.5 Hz and 14.8 Hz.

In the Spring of 2001, an average surface frequency of 18.8 Hz was measured. The ground

motion data at depth fell within the resolution of the instrumentation and frequencies could not

be reliably calculated.

The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) frequency is a measure of the predominant frequency over

the entire waveform and indicates the frequency containing most of the ground motion energy.

In contrast, the frequency at the PPV (or peak frequency) is the frequency calculated from the

zone-crossings for the cycle containing the PPV. Average values for PPV and frequency at the

PPV by well site, as well as dominant waveform frequency obtained from the FFT are plotted on

Figures 1 through 5 in Appendix A. The decrease in ground motion with depth is shown in

Figure 1 (Appendix A) for the Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring season and Figures 2 and 3

(Appendix A) for 2000 and Spring 2001 combined. The linear trend for the averaged combined

data is:

V (average) = -0.0015 D + 0.0421

where V = the average PPV

D = the burial distance

The correlation coefficient (R2) for the data is 0.38.

(1)

The average decrease in ground motion velocity was 0.0015 ips per foot below the ground

surface, dependent on geology and coupling. Individual well site rates are provided in Figure 1

in Appendix A. For well-coupled burial depths (2 feet and below), this rate ranges between -

0.002 and -0.0026 (the negative indicating a decrease with depth) ips per foot of burial. The

best-fit trend line giving the decrease in frequency at the PPV with burial depth, shown in Figure

4 of Appendix A, is:

F (average) = -0.232 D + 16.7 (2)

P:\9290\SummaryRpi.4·2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 19

Page 23: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

where F = the average peak frequency

D = the burial distance

Figure 5 of Appendix A shows the relationship between peak particle velocity and frequency at

the peak for 2000 data, plotted on the OSM blasting level chart (1986).

It is difficult to distinguish the frequency differences between surface and buried ground

motions. All data fell between 5.4 Hz and 34.1 Hz

5.2 Water Quality and Well Yield Data

As was the case with vibration monitoring, the data sets for field and laboratory water quality

and well yield were most complete for the initial monitoring period. Analytical reports from water

quality sampling and time-series graphs showing the results of downhole and well yield

monitoring are included as Appendices Band C, respectively.

During the Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring event, water samples were collected from wells at each

of the study sites prior to and after blasting (Table 3), and the results of the analyses are

summarized in Table 4. Generally, parameters were stable throughout the monitoring period

and showed no effects from blasting, as exemplified by the KY-1 Well-1 site. However, iron and

TSS concentrations measured prior to and after blasting differed significantly in many wells

(Table 4). It is theorized that these differences were caused by the stirring of sediments and

sloughing of scale from both normal well operation and the introduction of monitoring

equipment. Laboratory analysis was not performed during any of the subsequent monitoring

events.

The dates and times of blasting events were placed on time-series graphs of data collected from

field water quality monitoring, allowing identification of any changes in any of the parameters

related to blasting (Appendix C). Throughout the study, where data are available, well yield and

water level trends remained unchanged due to blasting. For example:

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6-2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 20

Page 24: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 3. Water Quality Sample Inventory

Pre-Test Post-Test

State Site ID WeiiiD Date Sample ID Date Sample ID

Virginia VA-1 Well-1 11/06/00 Boggs 1 11/18/00 Boggs 2

Kentucky KY-1 Well-1 11/09/00 Ratliffe 1 11/18/00 Ratliff 2

Well-2 11/09/00 Banks 1" 11/18/00 Banks 2

KY-2 Well-1 Well not sampled

Well-2 11/18/00 Sumner 1

Well-3 11/20/00 Hurley #1

West Virginia WV-1 Well-1 11/26/00 Dean 1-1

Well-2 11/26/00 Dean 2-1

WV-2 Well-1 12/04/00 Abbott 1-1

Well-2 12/04/00 Abbott 2-1

Note: All samples analyzed by Inter-Mountain Laboratories, Inc. of Farmington, New Mexico • Duplicate analysis performed on sample

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Fina1.6-2002\T3_WQSmpllnvntry.doc 21

11/25/00 Sumner-2

11/25/00 Hurley-2

12/4/00 Dean 1-2

12/4/00 Dean 2-2

12n100 Abbott 1-2

12n1oo Abbott 2-2

Page 25: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

!\) !\)

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 4. Results of Laboratory Water Quality Analyses, Initial Quarterly Monitoring Event

Concentration (mg/L)

General Parameters Total Metals

State Site ID WelllD Date TDS TSS Sulfate Aluminum Iron

Virginia VA-1 Well-1 11/06/00 1,740 19 991 <0.05 17.7

11/18/00 1,710 9 955 <0.05 0.03

Kentucky KY-1 Well-1 11/09/00 274 3 72 <0.05 3.48

11/18/00 260 21 72 <0.05 24.8

Well-1 Dup 11/09/00 272 10 72 <0.05 3.34

Well-2 11/09/00 448 4 109 <0.05 4.17

11/18/00 430 14 108 0.07 5.71

KY-2 Well-1 Well not sampled

Well-2 11/18/00 250 <2 7 <0.05 20.8

11/25/00 250 103 5 0.06 67.0

Well-3 11/20/00 700 22 36 <0.05 12.9

11/25/00 650 26 37 <0.05 14.7

West Virginia WV-1 Well-1 11/26/00 400 75 145 0.07 28.4

12104/00 380 <2 144 <0.05 5.42

Well-2 11/26/00 320 7 109 <0.05 4.62

12/04/00 280 <2 109 <0.05 1.84

WV-2 Well-1 12/04/00 180 <2 7 <0.05 0.89

12107/00 140 6 <5 <0.05 0.34

Well-2 12/04/00 160 58 15 <0.05 16.4

12/07/00 130 35 12 <0.05 5.16

mg/L =Milligrams per liter TDS =Total dissolved solids TSS =Total suspended solids

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Rnai.6·2002\T 4_LabWQRslts.doc

Manganese

1.10

0.88

0.44

0.35

0.42

0.36

0.42

0.89

3.86

1.51

1.46

1.00

0.85

0.39

0.24

0.10

0.03

0.55

0.07

Page 26: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

• The well yield from VA-1 Well-1 remained between 8 and 10 gallons per minute (gpm)

during the entire Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring period, unaffected by blast timing. When

VA-1 Well-1 was monitored again in Spring 2001 the well yield was in the same range.

• Where well yields were erratic, such as in KY-1 Well-2 during the Fall-Winter 2000

monitoring period, the erratic behavior did not correspond to the blast timing.

• Water level changes in wells, if any, were very regular and predictable and were related

to household schedules. During periods of high water use for activities such as bathing

and washing dishes, the pump cycles more often, resulting in a short-term lowering of

the water level in the well. WV-2 Well-2 is a good example of these types of water level

changes.

Field water quality parameters remained in similar ranges throughout the study (Table 5). The

data from the downhole sensors fall into three categories:

• Very little change in measured parameters. A good example of this result can be seen

in the temperature, pH, and EC data for WV-1 Well-1 during the Winter 2001 monitoring

period, which remained nearly unchanged throughout the monitoring period.

• Spikes in measured parameters related to household schedules. For instance, during

the Fall-Winter 2000 monitoring, VA-1 Well-1 showed spikes in temperature related to

ground water being brought into the well during high use periods of the day.

• Sensor drift. Fouling of the instrument in the well can cause a gradually drifting data

trend, or sensor drift. The slowly rising pH in well WV-2 Well-1 over the Spring 2001

monitoring period is a prime example of sensor drift. The continually increasing pH trend

in this well is not disrupted by the blasts.

P:I9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6·200210SMStudyTF _628.doc 23

Page 27: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 5. Results of Field Turbidity Monitoring Page 1 of 3

Site Date Time Turbidity

VA-1 Well-1 11/05/00 15:45 30.9

11/05/00 15:50 61.1

11/05/00 15:59 54

11/06/00 09:20 30.2

11/06/00 09:40 22.7

11/07/00 09:40 34.6

11/07/00 10:00 30.5

11/07/00 10:15 27.7

11/07/00 16:01 29.4

11/08/00 05:49 38.7

11/08/00 06:04 11.3

11/09/00 08:30 25.9

11/09/00 09:00 23.4

11/09/00 13:58 17.7

11/09/00 16:14 39.1

11/09/00 16:30 61

11/09/00 16:43 61.5

11/09/00 16:52 46.1

11/09/00 17:00 40.1

11/10/00 15:20 26.9

11/10/00 15:35 25.8

11/10/00 15:45 39.8

11/11/00 13:54 30.5

11/11/00 14:46 68.4

11/11/00 15:50 18.3

KY-1 Well-1 11/09/00 13:58 17.7

11/10/00 13:00 >1,000

11/12/00 16:00 192

11/13/00 09:53 NA 11/13/00 10:14 26.3

11/13/00 16:45 23.9

11/14/00 12:59 23.2

11/15/00 11:00 43.8

11/16/00 09:53 24.2

11/16/00 11:35 21.2

11/17/00 11:55 90.9

11/17/00 12:52 31.9

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6·2002\T5_FialdMsrmnts.doc 24

Page 28: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 5. Results of Field Turbidity Monitoring Page 2 of 3

Site Date Time Turbidity

KY-1 Well-2 11/09/00 11:25 2.59

11/09/00 11:30 2.34

11/09/00 13:30 13

11/10/00 11:38 5.28

11/12/00 09:03 177

11/12/00 12:30 170

11/13/00 10:08 20.3

11/13/00 16:40 7.59

11/14/00 13:10 20.9

11/15/00 10:55 2.64

11/16/00 09:58 24.2

11/16/00 11:36 20.1

11/17/00 12:03 2.78

11/17/00 12:52 0.99

KY-2 Well-2 11/19/00 14:15 19

11/20/00 17:10 24

11/22/00 09:45 56.5

11/25/00 18:50 101

KY-2 Well-3 11/20/00 14:55 2.82

11/20/00 17:20 8.1

11/22/00 09:25 4.22

11/25/00 17:50 60.6

WV-1 Well-1 11/26/00 16:00 29.80

11/27/00 12:57 54.1

11/27/00 13:30 30.2

11/28/00 12:54 67.9

11/28/00 13:29 58.2

11/29/00 11:24 54.8

11/29/00 12:40 45.2

12/02/00 10:40 17.9

12/02/00 12:10 25.8

WV-1 Well-2 11/26/00 16:00 58

11/27/00 12:58 29.2

11/27/00 13:32 60.2

11/28/00 12:50 35.6

11/28/00 13:24 37.8

11/29/00 11:22 6.48

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6·2002\T5_FieldMsrmnts.doc 25

Page 29: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Table 5. Results of Field Turbidity Monitoring Page 3 of 3

Site Date Time Turbiu;1y ll WV-1 Well-2 (cont.) 11/29/00 12:30 9.3

12/02/00 10:40 9.22

12/02/00 12:10 11.1

WV-2 Well-1 12/03/00 12:40 2.28

12/04/00 11:50 3.45

12/05/00 11:30 9.69

WV-2 Well-2 12/03/00 12:45 81.6

12/04/00 11:50 39.9

12/05/00 11:30 45.2

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4·2002\Finai.6·2002\T5_FieldMsrmnts.doc :26

Page 30: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

6. Summary and Conclusions

DBS&A was contracted by the OSMRE to design and initiate a long-term study to investigate

possible effects of mining operations on groundwater quality and supply in domestic wells. The

study was conducted between November 2000 and December 2001 and consisted of four field

data collection periods and subsequent data analysis.

During each of the monitoring periods, field personnel attempted to collect data deemed

necessary to determine effects of mining operations on nearby domestic wells, including

vibration/blasting, water quality, and well yield data. Data from the initial monitoring period are

the most complete. Unforeseen issues in data collection and removal of sites from the study for

various reasons resulted in progressively less complete data sets in each of the remaining data

collection periods, and during the final period, only one site of the original nine selected could be

monitored.

Vibration data became more sparse as the study progressed because mine blasting was

conducted at increasingly larger distances from the study sites. Ground movements produced

by blasting activities were attenuated by the greater distances and were in many instances not

strong enough to trigger the seismographs, indicating little vibratory effect in the ground

surrounding the wells. No adverse impacts to domestic water wells from surface coal mine

blasting were measured during this study. This lack of impact is valid for peak surface ground

motions that fall within 0.125 ips (the maximum ground motion recorded at the surface during

the study).

Few changes that could be directly attributed to a blast event were observed in the water quality

and well yield data collected. Water quality parameters did change slightly over time during

measuring periods, but none of these changes seem to be related to blasting, but appeared

instead to be the result of sensor drift and mixing of the water in the well due to pump cycling.

Well yield and water level remained in a constant range throughout each individual monitoring

season.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6·2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 27

Page 31: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

References

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1999. Coal resource assessment in the northern and central

Appalachian coal region. USGS Fact Sheet 115~99. October 1999.

Office of Surface Mining. 1986. Federal Register Cite: 51 FR 19444 (19461 ).

Robertson D.A., J.A. Gould, J.A. Straw, and M.A. Dayton. 1980. Survey of blasting effects on

ground water supplies in Appalachia. Prepared by Philip R. Berger & Associates,

Bradfordwoods, Pennsylvania. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C. November 1980.

P:\9290\SummaryRpt.4-2002\Finai.6·2002\0SMStudyTF _628.doc 28

Page 32: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix A

Vibration Monitoring Methods and Results

Page 33: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ground Motions Measurements Adjacent to Domestic Water Wells

Ground motions adjacent to nine domestic water wells were recorded during blasting events to determine the ground motion variation with depth below the ground surface. At each well selected for study, one tri-axial transducer was buried 0.42 ft. from the surface near each wellhead. A second transducer was buried at depth.

Two abandoned well casings and one hand-dug well were used to place transducers at depths between 9 and 20 ft. At four wells, an attempt was made to hand-dig holes as deep as possible to record ground motions. At most sites, the subsurface soils contained large gravels and cobbles, making it difficult to dig holes deeper than 3.5 ft. from the surface. At two sites, it was not possible to dig into the ground any deeper than 0.42 ft from the surface. Therefore, no second transducer was used at these two wells.

During the initial monitoring period in 2000, detailed information on the blasting activities were obtained from the mine operators. The distances from the blasting site to the wells ranged 1293 ft. to 5140 ft. away and averaged 2607 ft. Charge weights used for blasting ranged from 126 to 2076 lbs. per 8 ms (milliscond) delay. The scaled distances ranged from 56 to 343 ft./lbs. 112

Seismograph Equipment

Blasting-type seismographs, manufactured by LARCOR or Dallas, Texas, were used to monitor ground motions near wells. Sensors were embedded in epoxy within a water-tight housing for long-term survivability. Fifty-foot cables were used and attached to the housing aligned with the vertical geophone for ease of inserting at depth. Airblast was recorded using the surface seismograph.

Figure (1) shows the locations of geophones placed in or adjacent to wells. Geophones placed in abandoned wells were either grouted in place or encapsulated in crushed stone. Geophones placed within the ground adjacent to wells were tamped with pressure to ensure good coupling.

The following settings were used:

Ground trigger level Air trigger level Sample rate Record length Range Lowest velocity detected

Results

Vibration Data from Blasting

0.02 ips 125 dB 1248 samples/sec. 5 to 10 sec. 2.5 ips 0.005 ips

Full waveform vibration data are shown in Volume II for all blast events that were recorded. Tables ( 1) through ( 4) summarize the seismographs data recorded during fall-winter 2000, spring 2001, fall 2001, and winter 2001, respectively. Peak particle velocity (PPV), in ips (inches per

Page 34: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

second), the frequency at the PPV, in Hz (Hertz), and the airblast, in dB (decibels) are given. Detailed blasting records were available only during the fall-winter 2000 monitoring period. Hence, Table ( 1) provides information on distances from the blast to the seismographs, maximum pounds per 8 ms delay and scaled distance. This data set is the most complete with 54 shots recorded at nine wells. Subsequent monitoring periods were not as complete due to the loss of in Kentucky site KY -1 and Virginia as previously explained. Difficulties fielding equipment contributed to smaller data sets in the 2001 monitoring periods. Additionally, mine blasting was being conducted at farther distances from the wells during 2001, compared to the distances involved during the initial 2000 monitoring period, as mining moved away from the study sites. As such, many of the mine blasts did not trigger the seismographs.

The extensive 2000 data set shows average near-surface (0.42 ft.) and at depth (from 1.1 to 20ft.) peak particle velocities (PPV) of 0.043 ips and 0.033 ips, respectively. In the spring of 2001 as mining progressed away from the well site, the average PPV values were 0.038 ips and 0.029 ips for the near-surface and at depth locations, respectively. The maximum ground motion recorded at the surface was 0.125 ips. In the fall of 2001, only surface measurements were taken. These averaged 0.026 ips, less than the average in 2000. In all cases, a decrease in average ground motions with depth was measured. In no case did ground motions at depth exceed those measured at the surface.

Frequencies at the PPV also tended to decrease with depth as the degree of confinement increased. Similarly, average frequencies decreased with successive monitoring periods. The average frequencies near the ground surface and at depth in 2000 were 17.5 Hz and 14.8 Hz. In the spring of 2001, an average surface frequency of 18.8 Hz was measured. The ground motion data at depth fell within the resolution of the instrumentation and frequencies could not be reliably calculated.

Average values for PPV and frequency at the PPV by well site are given in Tables (5) through (8). The dominant waveform frequency obtained from the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is also shown. The FFT frequency is a measure of the predominant frequency over the entire waveform and indicates the frequency containing most of the ground motion energy. In contrast, the frequency at the PPV (or peak frequency) is the frequency calculated from the zone-crossings for the cycle containing the PPV.

Data contained in these tables are plotting in Figures (1) through (5). The decrease in ground motion with depth is shown in Figure ( 1) for the initial monitoring season (2000) and Figures (2) and (3) for 2000 and spring 2001 combined. The linear trend for the averaged combined data is

V (average)=- 0.0015 D + 0.0421 ( )

where V is the average PPV, in ips, and D is the burial distance, in ft. The correlation coefficient (R2

) for the data is 0.38. The best-fit line through the data indicates that an average decrease in ground motion velocity of 0.0015 ips occurs per foot of depth below the ground surface. The rate of decrease is dependent on geology and coupling. Individual well site rates are given in Figure (1). For well-coupled burials depths (2ft. and below), this rate ranges between -0.002 and -0.0026 (the negative indicating a decrease with depth) ips per ft. of burial.

Page 35: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

0.10 .---------------::::====:::;., --J!! :§. ~ 0.08 0 g w > ~ 0.06 j::: 0 :!: c ~ 0.04 0 a: (!)

w (!) ill! 0.02 w > <

~~-i:ii023--. ~.002 ~-0023 -& ~.0008

eVA-1

•KY-1 well1

DKY-1 well2

•KY-2well1

+WV-1 well1

<>WV-1 we112

eWV-2well1

0.00+-------------------------~--------------------------~

Figure (1)

0.10

$" e. ~ 0.08

0 g ~ z 0

0.06

i= 0 ::E c z

0.04 ::I 0 a: (!) w (!)

ill! 0.02 w ~

0.00

Figure (2)

0 10 20

DEPTH OF BURIAL (ft)

Average ground motion velocity versus depth of burial for fall-winter 2000 data showing the rate of decrease in ground motion velocity with depth

• • • • • ~. 0

e • •

• 0

e FALL-WINTER 2000

o SPRING 2001

0 10 20

DEPTH OF BURIAL (ft)

Average ground motion velocity versus depth of burial for fall-winter 2000 and spring 2001

Page 36: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

:w a ~ 0 0 ..J w > z 0

5 :::!: c z ::1 0 0:: (!)

w (!)

~ w ~

Figure (2)

"N ;;. > a.. a.. w :I: 1-1-<(

> 0 z w ::I a w n:: LL w Cl n:: LU > <(

Figure (4)

0.10

V = -0.0015 D + 0.0421

R2 = 0.38 0.08

• • 0.06 • • •

0.04

0.02

0.00 +--------------r---------------1

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

0 10 20

DEPTH OF BURIAL (ft)

Average ground motion velocity versus depth of burial for fall-winter 2000 and spring 2001

• F = -0.232 D + 16.7

R2 = 0.06 • •

• • • .. • • •• •• • •

0 10

DEPTH OF BURIAL (ft)

Average peak frequency versus depth of burial for fall-winter 2000 and spring 2001

-4

20

Page 37: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

~ 0 0 ...I w > z 0 i= 0 ~ c z ::::)

0 a:: (!)

10

l~~~~~~:J='---~----~-C=L~~~---D-----'~-~~-~--~---:~"----=----~~~~~J?-~~~ll --~- --r-t· ~--~-~~~:-:_ ~-~~ -~~: . ~-=: -:. -·-- -- 1---

. IOSM safe blasting limits for structures (solid line){-

····· "~-~-- __ :_-,.jo-· _. _;::.;::.:;-:::~-----,_-.,.f-... f.-- - - ·------- ---- ·- - . -- -- . -~

1 ti==~~~~~~:l==~~i:t!~~~~==J!~~~~~==l··J=:j·:~<·=~~~:f~lJ _.......!" _ _:_f::_ - - t----- _:~----~-=~ I = -_ ~ .. - ___ -___ --..-_-___ ~---- -_-_-__ -- -- ---r--,--- --t------ -- -I-- --~ -···-· '-- - t----- ··--·--t----- --1---1---'

• 0.1 ~~====~~~~-=--~-=--~~=--~t-~~~~~~-=~:rJfc-~-=·-==-~-~~~~-~~~-~r---~r-=j_,~:ti __ 3_ .. -------- --- --~----=· ) 1-1--- -0: - - -:_ __ ~r:---::t.:- ~--1---c::::

I-- - --=-r-- -- -~~ --- ----~ ~- • ------ - -- -t-f-------- --------- -- f--=;(-- ~ o .ca •tHII..-S>---1*---+ --1-----

------- .. _C?_~r-- _ ._. eo [?""_•--- ---1--- _ - 0 ·-

~~ o.o1 l§~~:;:~!~t;--~=-r-~~i--'-t'=~t---~~--~~~~~~~~---~~~aa ~ ~ ~ -~·.-:-~ ~ • Ground Surface t-- _ -t------t------t-----t---t·-f---

w r-- o Depth 1----+--+-+ -l--+---lf--- ---+--+---!--+-f---1----+----1·--f-~ --t----+--+--- ·-·-·"-I--f-- "

0.001 +----....L.--_.j,.-....J...._.j,.---l.-J.._I.....J......f.-------''---....L.--.__...J........J.......J.....J,....j.-f

1 10

FREQUENCY (Hz)

Figure (5) Peak particle velocity versus peak frequency for 2000 data

100

The best-fit trend line giving the decrease in frequency at the PPV with burial depth, shown in Figure ( 4 ), is

F (average)=- 0.232 D + 16.7 ( )

where F is the average peak frequency, in Hz, and Dis the burial distance, in ft. Figure (5) shows the relationship between peak particle velocity and frequency at the

peak for 2000 data, plotted on the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) blasting- level chart ( 1986). It is difficult to distinguish the frequency differences between surface and buried ground motions. All data fell between 5.4 Hz and 34.1 Hz

Vibration Data from Well Pumping

Well pumping did not produce detectable ground motions. The geophone placed in WV -1 well 2 at 20 ft. depth did not trigger during the 2000 monitoring period. All other geophones at depth were placed in dry (abandoned) wells or in the ground near the pumping well. It is expected that ground water pumping may produce localized ground motions that are well below the detectable limits of blasting seismographs. Hence no motion data was recorded.

References

Office of Surface Mining, (1986) Federal Register Cite: 51 FR 19444 (19461)

Page 38: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Table Summary of shot records and vibration and airblast monitoring at wells during the fall and winter of 2000

Charge GROUND MOTION AND AIRBLAST AT DEPTH

Scaled Well Shot Distance Weight per

Distance Peak Peak Geophone

Paak Peak

location Date Time Delay UNIT Particle Alrblast UNIT Particle

Velocity Frequency Depth

Velocity Frequency

(ft) {I b) (Mb'") (In/sec) (Hz) (dB) (ft) (In/sec) (HZ)

11/6100 16:57 1293 337 70.4 1181 0.04 12.8 118 1180 0.04 11.9

11/7/00 16:41 1380 361 72.6 1181 NO TRIGGER 1180 0.02 15

11/B/00 16:45 1293 361 68.1 1181 0.045 13.4 117 1180 0.04 13.8 VA·1 1.1

11/9/00 12:55 1380 313 1ao 1181 0.055 19.6 119 1180 0.045 19.6

11/10/00 13:20 1353 361 71.2 1181 0.055 13.8 118 1180 0.055 13.8

11/11/00 14:48 1298 361 68.3 1181 0.045 8.9 126 1180 0.045 9.1

11/13/00 16:04 4800 684 183.5 804 0.030 24.3 100 809 NO TRIGGER

11/14/00 16:18 5000 936 163.4 804 0.025 13.4 106 809 0.020 16

11/15/00 11:49 2020 828 70.2 804 0.055 20.4 112 809 NO TRIGGER KY-1

well1 11/16/00 9:07 5140 1026 180.5 804 0.020 10.6 106 3.5 809 0.020 14.2

11/16/00 16:00 2240 414 110.1 804 0.025 108 110 809 0.020 15

11117/00 12:15 1830 936 59.8 804 0.025 12.1 110 809 0.020 11.6

11/17/00 12:34 2020 1044 62.5 804 0.065 6.0 120 809 0.060 7.1

11/13/00 16:04 4760 684 182.0 849 0.03 21.3 <100 853 0.025 22.2

11/14/00 16:18 4880 936 159.5 849 O.Q35 16.0 106 853 0.025 12.8

11/15/00 11:49 2200 828 76.5 849 0,04 11.9 112 853 0.035 11.1 KY-1

well2 11/16/00 9:07 5020 1026 156.7 849 0.025 17.6 100 2.4 853 0.02 20.4

11/16/00 16:00 2420 414 118.9 849 0.025 11.6 106 853 0.025 11.1

11/17/00 12:15 1720 936 56.2 849 0.025 20.4 110 853 0.02 15

11/17/00 12:34 2310 1044 71.5 849 0.04 18.9 118 853 0.035 7.8

11120100 13:03 2000 274 120.8 849 0.025 6.7 114 809 0.025 5.9

11/20/00 16;08 2010 495 90.3 849 0.030 23.2 119 809 0.02 16.5

11/20/00 16:45 2380 211 163.8 849 0.020 28.4 100 809 NO TRIGGER KY-2

well1 11/21/00 14:37 2110 274 127.5 849 0.020 32.0 114 9.5 809 NO TRIGGER

11/21/00 15:35 1560 211 107.4 849 0.045 14.2 110 809 0.025 12.1

11/21/00 16:43 3720 807 131.0 849 0.045 28.4 100 809 NO TRIGGER

11/22/00 10:13 1960 678 75.3 849 0.030 a 110 809 0.025 5.4

11/20/00 10:32 4640 183 343.0 804 0.02 14.6 100

11/20/00 16:09 1810 495 81.4 804 0.035 16 120

11/21/00 14:38 1960 274 118.4 804 0.03 16 118 KY-2

11121/00 well2 15:35 1740 211 119.8 804 0.04 13.4 116 NOT MONITORED

11/21/00 16:41 3810 808 134.0 804 0.03 14.6 110

11/21/00 16:43 2500 209 172.9 804 0.04 21.3 110

11122/00 10:14 2210 678 84.9 804 0.02 11.1 114

11/27/00 16:56 2500 1037 77.6 1782 0.07 11.1 117 1781 0.065 16.5

WV-1 11/28/00 17:03 2230 126 198.7 1782 NO TRIGGER 2.0

1781 0.02 13.1 well1 11/29/00 9:51 4300 2076 94.4 1782 0.055 14.2 110 1781 0.05 13.4

11/30/00 11:53 3880 2076 85.2 1782 0.065 13.4 110 1781 0.06 13.8

11/27/00 16:01 2600 1037 80.7 1780 0.095 11.9 122 1779 0.025 10.8

WV-1 11/28/00 17:05 2310 126 205.8 1780 0.020 14.6 114 1779 NO TRIGGER well2

200 11/29/00 9:56 3960 2076 86.9 1780 0.090 14.6 110 1779 0.015

11/30/00 11:58 3980 2076 87.4 1780 0.070 14.2 112 1779 0.015

12/4/00 12:23 1710 481 78.0 1782 0.125 18.9 112 1780 0.07 23.2

12/4/00 17:01 2240 415 110.0 1782 0.085 24.3 112 1780 0.045 21.3

12/5/00 12:05 2440 973 782 1782 0.05 28.4 116 1780 0.03 25.6

WV-2 12/5/00 16:51 2070 625 82.8 1782 0.06 22.2 116 1780 0.035 15.5 well1

9.0 12/S/00 16:52 2520 901 84.0 1782 0.02 34.1 112 1780 NO TRIGGER

12/6/00 12:22 2460 901 82.0 1782 0.02 25.6 112 1780 0.015 21.3

12/6/00 16:48 1560 452 73.4 1782 0.085 19.6 114 1780 0.06 22.2

1217/00 12:13 2460 793 87.4 1782 O.Q35 20.4 106 1780 0.025 18.9

12/5/00 12:05 2520 973 80.8 1779 0.030 189 117

WV-2 12/5/00 16:53 2130 625 85.2 1779 0.030 32 116 NOT MONITORED

well2 12/6/00 16:50 1630 452 76.7 1779 0.060 24.3 117

1217/00 12:13 2520 793 89.5 1779 0.020 16.5 110

Page 39: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Table Summary of vibration and airblast monitoring at wells during the spring of 2001

GROUND MOTION AND AIR BLAST AT DEPTH

Well Shot Time

Peak Peak Geophone

Peak Peak

location Date UNIT Particle Airblast UNIT Particle Velocity

Frequency Depth Velocity

Frequency

(In/sec) (Hz) (dB) (ft) (In/sec) (Hz)

VA-1 resident on city water- no longer using well

KY-1 site flooded from sediment pond overflow - no access to wells

KY-2 seismographs did not trigger for 15 shots (trigger level not Indicated)

4/3/01 8:41 1781 0.03 12.1 114 1782 0.025 12.4

4/3/01 13:51 1781 0.03 15 110 1782 0.03 15

4/3/01 17:06 1781 0.025 10.8 114 1782 NO TRIGGER

4/4/01 11:20 1781 0.05 12.8 110 1782 0.045 13.1

4/5/01 10:34 1781 0.055 16 106 1782 0.05 15

4/6/01 10:22 1781 0.05 12.1 106 1782 0.05 12.4

4/6/01 15:43 1781 0.06 13.8 112 1782 0.06 13.4 WV-1

4/9/01 well1 12:41 1781 0.04 14.2 114 2.0 1782 0.03 15.5

4/9/01 16:35 1781 0.025 12.8 110 1782 NO TRIGGER

4/10/01 15:45 1781 0.045 14.2 116 1782 0.04 13.8

4/10/01 16:53 1781 O.Q35 13.4 100 1782 O.Q35 14.2

4/11/01 9:57 1781 0.025 8.6 116 1782 NO TRIGGER

4/12101 10:37 1781 0.035 11.6 114 1782 0.03 13.8

4/12101 12:22 1781 0.03 14.2 114 1782 0.03 12.4

4/13/01 10:30 1781 O.Q35 11.9 112 1782 0.03 12.1

4/2101 8:38 1779 0.025 15.5 114 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/3/01 13:48 1779 0.035 14.2 110 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/3/01 17:03 1779 0.025 13.1 118 1780 0.005

4/4/01 11:18 1779 0.045 11.9 110 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/5/01 10:31 1779 0.080 14.2 106 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/6/01 10:19 1779 0.055 13.8 106 1780 NO TRIGGER

WV-1 4/6/01 15:40 1779 0.055 14.6 114 1780 NO TRIGGER well2

20.0 4/9/01 12:39 1779 0.035 13.1 116 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/10/01 15:42 1779 0.035 18.2 118 1780 0.005

4/11/01 9:54 1779 0.005 119 1780 0.005

4/12/01 10:35 1779 0.030 12.8 119 1780 0.005

4/12101 12:20 1779 0.030 14.2 116 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/12/01 17:02 1779 0.025 13.4 118 1780 0.005

4/13/01 10:27 1779 0.040 12.8 114 1780 NO TRIGGER

4/16/01 16:50 1781 0.075 32 110 1782 0.04 22.2

4/18/01 16:51 1781 O.Q35 10.8 116 1782 NO TRIGGER WV-2 4/18/01 16:54 1781 0.03 well1

22.2 106 9.0 1782 0.025 10.4

4/19/01 8:55 1781 0.035 24.3 110 1782 0.025 22.2

4/19/01 16:52 1781 0.025 12.4 106 1782 NO TRIGGER

WV-2 4/16/01 16:49 1779 0.035 30.1 112 1780 0.03 34.1

well2 na

4/18/01 16:50 1779 0.025 25.6 118 1780 NO TRIGGER

na not available

Page 40: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Table Summary of vibration and airblast monitoring at wells during the fall of 2001

GROUND MOTION AND AIRBLAST AT DEPTH

Well Shot Time

Peak Peak Geophone

Peak Peak

location Date UNIT Particle Alrblast UNIT Particle Velocity

Frequency Depth Velocity

Frequency

(in/sec) (Hz) (dB) (ft) (In/sec) (Hz)

VA-1 resident on city water • no longer using well

KY·1 site flooded from sediment pond overflow • no access to wells

9/21/01 14:25 809 0.020 14.2 125

KY·2 9/24/01 13:53 809 0.030 14.6 100 well2

NOT MONITORED 9/25/01 12:37 809 0.030 11.6 <100

9/25/01 15:44 809 0.025 23.2 116

KY·2 9/21/01 10:32 813 0.03 9.4 118 well3 NOT MONITORED

9/22101 11:43 813 0.02 16.5 106

ave 0.026 14.917 113.000

Page 41: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Table Summary of vibration and airblast monitoring at wells during the winter of 2001

GROUND MOTION AND AIRBLAST AT DEPTH

Well Shot Time

Peak Peak Geophone

Peak Peak

location Date UNIT Particle Airblast UNIT Particle Velocity

Frequency Depth Velocity

Frequency

(in/sec) (Hz) (dB} (ft) (in/sec) (Hz)

VA-1 resident on city water - no longer using well

KY-1 site flooded from sediment pond overflow - no access to wells

KY-2 seismographs did nottrlgger for 15 shots (trigger level not Indicated)

WV-1 well not monitored -transducer at depth missing (NOTHING IN BUDROW'S NOTES!!) well1

12/4/01 16:44 1769 0.033 13.4 106 1905 NO TRIGGER WV-1

12/5/01 16:46 1769 0.033 15.5 110 20.0 1905 NO TRIGGER well2 12/5/01 16:50 1769 0.053 16 114 1905 NO TRIGGER

WV-2 well not monitored well1 WV-2 well not monitored well2

Page 42: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Table Average ground motion, airblast and frequency values for wells measured during the fall of 2001

FALL 2001

Surface At Depth

SITE WELL Peak Particle Peak FFT Peak Particle Peak FFT Velocity Frequency Frequency

Airblast Velocity Frequency Frequency

(ips) (Hz) {Hz) (dB) (ips) {Hz) (Hz)

VA-1 well1 resident on city water- no longer using well

KY-1 wetl1 site flooded from sediment pond overflow- no access to wells well2

KY-2 well-1 deep transducer cable cut

well-2 0.026 15.9 8.7 114 not monitored

well3 0.025 13.0 NA 112 not monitored

WV-1 well1 not monitored

well2 not monitored

WV-2 well 1 not monitored

well-2 not monitored

NA not available; data within the resolution of the seismograph and frequencies cannot be reliably calculated

Page 43: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

VA-1

• 0.42 ft.

• 1.1 ft.

KY-1

well1 well2

Ill 0.42 ft. IIIII Sin.

3.5 ft. • 2.4 ft.

Figure 1 Geophone locations within or adjacent to wells

Page 44: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

well1

WV-1

well1

• 0.42ft.

Ill 0.42 ft.

Ill

well2

• 0.42 ft.

9.5 ft.

well2

Ill 0.42 ft.

2ft.

20ft.

Figure I (cont.)

Page 45: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

WV-2

well1 well2

Ill 0.42 ft. • 0.42 ft.

9ft.

Figure 1 (cont.)

Page 46: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Volume II

Full Waveform Vibration Data

Page 47: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

FALL~ WINTER 2000

Page 48: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well

File: 01181 062.DTB Event Number: 062 Date: 11/06/2000 Time: 16:57 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s Serial Number: 1181

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB @ 2.1 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Vertical (V): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Transverse (T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 10.6Hz 0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

1 .• J liR~- I Jill\ lUI Jll....J'L ..•. jlll 1\111\(1 .. _fL ___ r-1 .Ill I I I ····-·...N."l .. _______ ./"""\ ..•• j\)1 I

Cal OK

... --------·- , .. , ........ ~----··--- ....... ~--

Cal OK

v r~cv-~~' '. ''·-~-- .. -... -·----------

Cal OK

T r_~ ______ ~-------tv-,,~ _____ '"""" _____ ------_-_ ........... ___________ ...... ----~--- .. -t .I ___ L_ _______ ] _____ 1 --··-·------·····- .l... _______ L ___ _

Os --'-"Is'----- 2s _____ .. ____ 3s .. --------~~- . -~-- _ _ __ 6s___ _ __ 7~------=-Bs=----~------1

[

---- Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.94 Hz 4.63 Hz 12.00 Hz Transverse (T)

11.63 Hz 2 2.41£+01 2.41£+01 2.41E+OI

0-- L a, I 10 100

I

10 100 -~-r~~~n~y_<Hz) ________ _ Freq~~I!_~t_(!1z)

I

10 Fr~que~9' (Hz)

100 °1 1'o 100 _ .... _____ l::~~quency (_!:!_z) __ _

Page 49: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26 in. deep

File: 0 1180000.DTB Event Number: 000 Date: 11/06/2000 Time: 16:57 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 11.1Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (J1: 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 11.9Hz

Transverse (F): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 20.4Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (l.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

~R ~WvA·v-"·--·-.'~·--.-" -··-~-·-- ----

t I v r· ~"-~·-~- -----

fT ~·~~' ' _:_·~-----~~- __ , ____ __:___-·-··:~~- ______ ~________ L__ ... __ t_ ___ _

Cal OK \

/ \ -, I .

\/

Cal OK \

-- "\\// \

Cal OK /\

!/ '\ \j -

\

Os Is 2s -~-- ___ 4~_ 5s _6s ____ __?J.__ _____ J~~---·~--------1 Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

2.10E+OI

0· I

Ra_dial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 11.63 Hz 11.94 Hz 9.44 Hz

2.10E+OI 2.10E+OI

..rf I

-- I --·-

10 100 ------·----· I -----·

lO I--

10 100 lOO _ yrequency f!::!_z) Frc_que11_cy (~L- _ Frequ~~CJ_(Hz)

Page 50: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26 in. deep

File: 0118000l.DTB Event Number: 001 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 16:41 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): O.Ol5inls 0.38Imm/s @I 1.9Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Transverse (T): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ IO.OHz 0.20in/s (O.OSOinls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

---- -- -\\};/\\_

t~~~~~ L -· ------------ I ··----- I l____ _ _ _____j_ ---- I J .. ·-·------

Cal OK (\

--- I\ \;

Cal OK /\

\ I ' \,/

Os -- I;,---- --28 __________ _3s _______ 4s ?s__ __ _ ___ ____§~ 7s _____ ..;;:8~s ----------1 Fourier Analysis {Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

1.77£+01

0----1

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 2.19 Hz 7.00 Hz 1.88 Hz

1.77E+Ol

;vi __ 1 ____________ trli"'YIIWitil'lll.lolill I ---~

10 100 10 100 _ _!rcque~cy (Hz) F~c_9~ncy (I:J:~- __

1.77E+Ol

0 ------1

I

10 _ _Frequency_illz)

...... --------------------~------- -----

100

Page 51: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well

File: 01181 063.DTB Event Number: 063 Date: 11108/2000 Time: 16:45 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1181

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB@ 2.9 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.4Hz

Vertical (JI): 0.045in/s 1.143mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Transverse (T): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 8.2Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK _.r"""'l...._..J""""""L..____ _ 1 n _______________ ___r--- 1

Cal OK

Cal OK

v ~>'

Cal OK

T

tc-:_~::~'~WW\A"-'--~- :· --~-----~ -- ----~:~=--~, :-~~-~~-=---, ---·==---~ ___ -_I----

Os ls 2s 3s 4s _____ 5§___ _ _ -~ 7s _8'--"-s---~ -~------;

Acoustic (A) 1.38 Hz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

5.06 Hz 3.94 Hz Transverse (T)

10.88 Hz 1.40E+02 3.06E+Ol 3.06E+Ol 3.06E+OI

0-­I L.AL

10 100 I 10 100 _ Fre~~E~_L(l::l~l_ ____________ _ ~'requen?Y (Hz)

01 ------t'o--- 100

_ _________ Frequency (!:!zj _________ _

01 - ------ t'o

Freque_~~_Q!?) 100

Page 52: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26 in. deep

File: 01180002.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 002 Date: 11/08/2000 Time: 16:45 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 9.4Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 13.8Hz Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mmls @ 11.6Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mrnls/div)

lv -"V'.,~ft/"'·"-- - - - --- - -

T

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

[~~~~=~~=--= .--!.---· .. I _______ I _______ I ------=~

Cal OK /\ ·\; \.

Cal OK

l\ .\ I -\,_/

Os Is 2s _ __)_~--- _. __ 4_s_______ 5s 6s 7s --:---~8so:.__ _____ _ Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

2.59E+01

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 5.94 Hz 9.75 Hz 10.75 Hz

2.59E+01

I I

10 100 10 Frequ~~9'.J!!Z) _____ X~~guency (Hzl_ _____ _

100

2.59E+01

0 ---1

I

10 100 T~9.~~J1CY (H~)_ .. -·----- ..

Page 53: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well

File: 01181 064.DTB Event Number: 064 Date: 11/09/2000 Time: 12:55 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1181

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 119 dB @ 6.5 Hz

(0.18Mb 0.0026psi 0.01 80kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025inls 0.635mrn/s @ 8.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.04inls 1.016mm/s @ 10.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.055in/s 1.397mm/s @ 19.6Hz 0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals -------------------------------------~----

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

~~~-~---- ----------- ---------

Cal OK

~I_.,,~~~~--"'-'"---=------- -L~~-----L_--·.,-=--=~~ ~-------~~-----~- 1 Os Is 2,.s ____ 3s _____ 4s ____ 5~-- ___ 6~ _____ ]_~ r- Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Ss------------1

1 Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

I 1.19 Hz 2.00 Hz 8.63 Hz

5.86E+Ol 2.03E+Ol 2.03E+Ol

~J too 01 - ------ 110 -··I -~··~ltfl#illll-

10 100 ---------- I··-

10 Frequency_(~! _ Freque~cy_(l:lz) _ ______ _ _ Frequ~~-~>:__(Hz)

Transverse (T) 4.69 Hz

2.03E+Ol

I

10 _________________ Frequen~y_(J:::lz)_

100

Page 54: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26 in. deep

File: Oll80003.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 003 Date: 11/09/2000 Time: 12:55 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.045in/s 1.143mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.04in/s l.OI6mm/s @ 6.4Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 26.9Hz 0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: I.OO sec intervals

fT"=~ -~- -~- -----=-·· --~L_ ------·' -···------' -----------'··

Cal OK

/\ -, / -

\;

Cal OK

\ / \/

/\

Cal OK

' ;\_ \ /

•J

Os Is 2~- ~-- ___ 4s__ ·--5~--- 6s 7s _ __8=s'-----~··-·~-

1.83E+OI

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

5.06 Hz 4.56 Hz 1.88 Hz

____ I_,_

10 Freguc:n_9' (H_z)

100

1.83E+OI

0 ---- -I

··--·-----I

10 _ -· ___ Freque~~r_(Hz)

1.83E+OI

._L 10 100

_X~~_g_uency (~L ...

Page 55: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well

File: 01181066.DTB Event Number: 066 Date: 11/10/2000 Time: 13:20 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1181

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB @ 4.6 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0 160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035inls 0.889mm/s @ 18.2Hz

Vertical (Jl): 0.055in/s 1.397mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Transverse(!'): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 14.6Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

R ~-~~'V'fv'-/'V'''V-~~--

v r~~~-~---

rr--"-- ..

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK I - ""L_f1 __________ _

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK T [_-_: __ :~v-==--·-~-~ :----~-:~----- -_1__:-.. ----~-------- '--------~~---L -----=-~~-~------·- Is 2s 3s ___ 4s Ss ____ 6s _____ 7_s ---'8=s ______ _

Acoustic (A) 4.81 Hz

6.80E+01

01 ------ ------t'o

Frequcn~y_(_li~)

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 10.06 Hz 9.88 Hz

3.00E+OI 3.00E+01

--------I 10 100 100

01 ~.-{____ 1'o

___ . ___ Freque~~Y-~~) _ Fre~en_cy (liz)

Transverse (T) 9.88 Hz

3.00E+01

--\

1oo 01 - ---·-- 1'o 100

_ _ _ ______ Fl1)g~~_ncy (Hz) ____ _

Page 56: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26in.deep

File: 0 1180004.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 004 Date: 11/10/2000 Time: 13:20 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.04inls 1.016mm/s @ 12.4Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (J?: O.OSin/s 1.27mm/s @ 14.6Hz Transverse (T): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 8.2Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

\\;/ /\

Cal OK T -, 1/\

\; [~"~''''v= ,- - -~ ~- .~ --~ ~-Os ls 2s__ _ ___ _}s _________ 4s ___ _1~- ____ _Ji_s_ _ __ _7_s __ R=s'------------i

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

2.90£+01

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 9.88 Hz 11.69 Hz 10.13 Hz

-·-·-·---- I ---·-

10 100

2.90E+OI

0 -l

I

lO 100

2.90E+OI

0 -l lO

______________ r~~e9~ency (Hz) ..... ~~9~~-~c_y(Hz) ... __ _Ircque_ncy (Hz) _

Page 57: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well 26 in. deep

File: 01180005.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 005 Date: 11/11/2000 Time: 14:48 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1180

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.045in/s 1.143mm/s @ lO.OHz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.04Sin/s 1.143mm/s @ 9.1Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 10.8Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

r~~v~~~~~---·· ,, ........ ~--r ~V\J\1\,~- ~ - ~~

T

f -~-:~ yv=~-~ ~-_-_· . .L___ . - _l____ . ..!....____ ··--'----- -------'------ -----------~--

Cal OK

\;(\

Cal OK /\

\j/ \.

Cal OK

/\ \ I ,_ \;

Os Is 2s 3s ... 4_s ________ 5~ ____ §s ____ 7s ---=8-=-s -----~ Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 6.00 Hz 5.94 Hz 6.13 Hz

5.61E+OI

J\!V1vv 01-- ........... I

I 10 100 ... ____________ Frequency ~Hz)_ ___ _

5.6JE+OI

/~) 0 ··--··

I I

10 F!equenc)'~!:l_zl___ ...

---------------------- ·-·--

5.61E+Ol

100 0 J\~ ~ 'lMM._

I 10 100 Frequency(f:Iz)

Page 58: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Hylton Well

File: 01181067.DTB Event Number: 067 Date: 11111/2000 Time: 14:48 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1181

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 126 dB@ 5.5 Hz

(0.42Mb 0.0061 psi 0.0420kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 126dB 0.40Mb (O.lOOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035inls 0.889mm/s @ I L6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.045in/s l.143mm/s @ 8.9Hz

Transverse (T): 0.04inls L016mm/s @ 11.3Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mm/s/div)

r-· · ~J~crJ\M·-~ R f- -~~-~- .. --~ .

IV ~·1,)\,J',j\r.J\.j'w·,_"l'v --"---------- -----·---­

~

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

T r_-__ --- ·•·wJ·""_r __ "~fV""1·---~"-- -- ·---·------------ --------- -- "------- ---"·-------

~ ···------- l I -----··· I ··-····------I . -------··· I ·------- ] _______ .. -. __ _! ____ "

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Os Is 2s _ _ _ ___h_ _"____±L_"_" --~- _ _ __ j.l~_ __"_~s _ _____:8~s:_______ ____ _

[

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1. 75 Hz 6.13 Hz 5.88 Hz 6.38 Hz 1 5.37E+01 5.37E+OI 5.37E+OI

I

10 F_I_""q"uency (Hz)

100

)\ 0 "' ..

I I_"_~

10 100 frequency (~2 _ _ _

J\) •I\ I 0 . - .... I

1 10 100 Freque~~X (Hz)

Page 59: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804032.DTB Event Number: 032 Date: 11113/2000 Time: 16:04 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: I 20dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0. 762mm/s @ 24.3Hz

Vertical (V): 0.0 15inls 0.381 mrnls @ O.OHz

!Transverse (F)' 0~25inls 0.635mmis @ 18.2Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

(~-

f-~--- . .. .. --------~v-.-~ -- --- ---.----------- - - -- --

T ~---~..-v'vVV"V""""v-~v----~------- ---- -- -- --·------~---~--------------------------· ----------··-

~ . .I ----------···---··--__L_ _____________ l..... I .. L _____ J.. Os Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s -----J,7=--s-

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

----------

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

6.44 Hz 4.31 Hz

-I_

Ss

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Transverse (T) 6.56 Hz

l.63E+Ol 3.17E+Ol 3.17E+OI 3.17E+Ol

- 0~ 10 100 I 10 100

I

10 100 Frequency (Hz) ___________________ t:requency (Hz)_ _______ _ Freque!lcy (H~)

Page 60: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804040.DTB Event Number: 040 Date: 11/14/2000 Time: 16:18 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 8.3Hz

Vertical (V}: 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 13.4Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mmls (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A ~ --- -- ------

1"1. -----, __ r r ~ -.._r- ..

i

R 1-.- ~~--vv--V'-1'--'YA-"-'/'•J ~- ....

c~~~~------------------------------ -------T t:···vv·V'\f\rvv·-~-~~----· ...•.. -. ---~J·---·· ----~~~-----··· ~---·.

-------- J -----------1.. -------- . .1 ···-----I ·--·-··----~- ---·-·· l ______ I __

Os Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s r - ----· ----------- ··-···--- ------- ------ -----Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

Acoustic (A) 1.50 Hz

Radial (R) Vertical {V) 6.50 Hz 1.63 Hz

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

I··---·

8s

Transverse (T) 9.56Hz

3.0lE+OJ 2.83E+OI 2.83E+OI 2.83E+OI

I

10 100 0 ·-------I-··--···

10 ___ F~guency(~~-) _ ~!~guefi~Y_£~)

100

Page 61: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well 3.5 ft. deep

File: 0080908 I .DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 081 Date: 11/14/2000 Time: 15:15 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 16.0Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 14.2Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (l.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R

T ~-~o•,0•vvc v ·~--~-- . ----

__ t ____ . . .. L_________ _ __ ...L..__________ _L________ I.------ __ _J___________ ... __1.___ ______ _

Cal OK /\ \I ,_

\/

Cal OK

/\ \ I -\/

Os ls __ 2s -----~- _____ '!_s_ _ _____ &___ ---~---- ___ _7_s ____ S~s:__~------1

2.51E+OJ

0 -I

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

6.44 Hz 9.75 Hz 10.25 Hz 2.51E+Ol 2.51E+Ol

100 °J - 10 100 I

10 ____ -~requency(~) __ _ -- - -- xrequency (~&___ --

Page 62: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well (no depth)

File: 00804042.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB

Event Number: 042 Date: 11/15/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 11:49 Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB @ 2.1 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.055in/s 1.397mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 11.9Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 7.0Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A

I \ I .JL..JL __ J~"""'LL-__

Cal OK R

I Cal OK v

~-~: --·--r-..,1\_i\.f\f\,- v·~-. 1\1\N\.r..J"-- ._r .. _;·,J• . ./"'-. _,. __ ·' --~---- -- - - -- --·- -~--- -----------·---

T

~ ·~--~·V·\~=~~ V' I --~~-~-===-- I_ _ __ L _________ I __ I -· ·-----

Os Is 2s __ ____l_L__ 4s_ 5s 6s _____ _7s 8S

Acoustic (A) 2.13 Hz

6.99E+Ol

1 ()(

l _______ -

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

6.25 Hz 2.50 Hz 8.31E+Ol 8.31E+Ol

V'-J~/ 0 1 ______ 110 100

_______ _I:_r~quency (Hz) _____________ frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 6.44 Hz

8.31E+Ol

.~_L 100 1 10 100

___________ _!req~e!lCY (liz)

Page 63: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804045.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB

Event Number: 045 Date: 1 I I 1 6/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 09:07 Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 1 20dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 10.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (1): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 16.0Hz 0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mm/s/div)

A I

I R

Time Lines at: 1 .00 sec intervals

--- ----- I r \.-1 1 -···----- -· 1 - '""L_ ___ ,,,,

t ~~~- ~- - - - --- ---- -~-

~~- "~-~- .. -. - -­

T ~ • --..Jvv-"v--y,,·."V"~~----· --- ·----"- -- -- -------- '- --

1 ··--·---l --------1. -------· __ _j___ .. ! _ _L_ __ . I ------ J ____ _

Os Is 2s_ 3s ___ -~- 5s ~-- ______]J__ -- - ___J______ --

8s

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A)

l.OO Hz 2.22E+Ol

-~ 10 100

~r~~~l}CY (Hz)

2.03E+Ol

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 6.44 Hz 11.38 Hz

2.03E+Ol

, __ 'M_MIIilll 10 100

01-- 10 100 ~~_9uency_ (!i_z) __ f:!~quency __{lfZ:~

Transverse (T) 11.88 Hz

2.03E+Ol

A 0 ------ --I--

1 lO 100 ___ [:!_e9uency__Lf!z)

Page 64: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well 3.5 ft. deep

File: 00809083.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 083 Date: 11116/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 09:06 Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div) r-- Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

tR ____ .,,.,v-- A~'"'"""" -- ' ~ ~-- -------- - ------··

tv""""'"""------- -. ---- ·-- -·-·-------·· I fJ., '"A"'~'-"" --' ,_ ---"

[_ I __ ___L__ •. ····---·--__.l___·---···· _ __.l_______ .. L ---·-·· _L____ .. ____ ..L___

Cal OK 1\ -\ I ,_

\l

Os Is 2~------- 3s _____ 4s _____ Ss _ 6s ___ 7s ------=-&s=----~-----1 Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 6.44 Hz 10.19 Hz 10.38 Hz

2.19E+Ol 2.19E+Ol 2.19E+OI

I . I

10 100 10 100 ___ Frcquc~cy (H_Z:) _________ Frequency!~) _

Page 65: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804048.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB

Event Number: 048 Date: 11/16/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mrnls

Time: 16:00 Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 10.8Hz Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 11.6Hz

Transverse (F): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: 0.20in/s (O.OSOin/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mrnls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A ___ J..I I r---..."\._n_,

Cal OK /\

-"--./ v t ~ R r '~V~,~-----~v~~~e-~ ~ e-.. --·---------------------- ------------------·--·-----------·-~------

T I--~·-....~ ... --.---,··"\.'"'·"· ·V"\/'..._........'\..-............. - ..•. - -~--~---

~------·-· I·--------- 1 ... ____ ___j__ __ ----- J. __ .... _/ _j___ _ _____ ! ---- --------1..

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

,os ___ ___::_:ls'--------~ _____ 3_s ______ !s _______ ~- _ 6s _ 7s ---"'8s"-----~----.j

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acousth: (A)

1.56 Hz 3.94E+Ol

0 ... 1

. '-~'"fl_l~ ...... 10

Frequenc_)'_(Hz) _ 100

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 7.25 Hz 11.56 Hz

3.65E+Ol 3.65E+Ol

\r 0 ., -· I

·-·-I

10 100 _Xr:_equency Jllz) ____ __

Transverse (T) 6.56 Hz

3.65E+Ol

.~Jiv e

I 10 ... -~~quency (Hz)

100

Page 66: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00809084.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 084 Date: 11/16/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 15:59 Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.02in/s O.S08mm/s @ 15.0Hz Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s O.S08mm/s @ 14.2Hz

R

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

t""" """""'" "'~','~-- ----Cal OK

v ~---v'~""""''vV'"-/V',·-·JVV"'" ··- ·-- --~-

1\ \I -\\.

~ T ~ .-.r.."-~\r"V'"-'V'J•I\.• -"-',r" , ---~ -.- - - " .

I ___ _____L_______ l. .. L___ .. ___ ___l_____ _ .1_______ .. ___ _i ___ _

Os ls _._]_s _____ J_s _____ J:L___ _ 5s ________ §~ ___ _]_§__ _ __8:::::S:__ _____ _

3.37E+Ol

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

7.19 Hz 11.56 Hz 6.56 Hz 3.37E+OI

I

10 100 100 Frequency (Hz) ______________ _

3.37E+Ol

/vii 0 ... ··-- --

1 I

10 __ ---~'requenc_¥J!:i!) __

100

Page 67: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804056.DTB Event Number: 056 Date: 11117/2000 Time: 12:15 Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Vertical (Ji): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse(!'): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

f

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

·· - ·---.; UL...,u 11 ··---!" 1 ·--- ·-

Cal OK

Cal OK

R ~-----.NI._'-'V'-~---,--- ---------~~---- ----------- -~-

-------------- ----------- ---------·------f~ ~'-Cal OK

T

[ __ '"-~~~L"'-- '·'~=~---- __ ./ ··---- --~---------· --------1._-____ --- ___ ------~~------ - _L__ __ ::-_____ L ____ _

Os Is 2s 3s ~-- ____ _1_~- __ 6~- ______ ?s 8s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window)

Acoustic (A) 2.25 Hz

1.50E+OI

I -----------] 0 100

X_r~_g~~ncy (~) ___ _

L---------- ···---

1.77E+OI

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 9.44 Hz 2.63 Hz

• ----- _ 1 _ _____ llfiiiiMI _____ Iildi 10

Freq~~~cy_~Hz) 100

1.77E+OI

01 ----I'o-- 100

_ _Xre9uenc~j!:!_zl __ _

Transverse (T) 6.31 Hz

l.77E+OI

0 1 - ------- 1'o too

Freq_l!ency (H~L ______ _

Page 68: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well 3.5 ft. deep

File: 00809085.DTB Event Number: 085 Date: 11117/2000 Time: 12:14 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 11.6Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.01in/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

T

~'"N~~V'-=~A'""'~~---- -~ 1. ···---L- ... ____ ___L______ _ I L___ _ ... .1 ____ _

O~s:.._ ___ _:l~s _____ 2_s _____ _ 3s 4s _______ S_s __ ---·· 6s. ___________ }s ---'8_s __ _

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Cal OK

-\~-

Cal OK /\

\ // \_ \

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.89E+OI 5.75 Hz 9.94 Hz 9.50 Hz

1.89E+Ol

l\h~ 0 --·--------- I

I 10 I

10 100

_ -~E-~9~!J1CY (Hz) .. _____ YE~gu_ency (Hz)

-~ 100

1.89E+Ol

-v\rl 0----

1 • I

10

·-----~~~-~ency_Lii_~----- _ 100

Page 69: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well

File: 00804058.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB

Event Number: 058 Date: 11117/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 12:34 Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 120 dB@ 2.0 Hz

(0.20Mb 0.0029psi 0.0200kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.065in/s 1.651mm/s @ 6.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.4Hz

Transverse (F): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 15.0Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

I-A ~----···· //\ ,/'\

I ""L1 \ •• I I ,, / \ ,-- L . ...r.l. I I . - .I '-____,_--1"""11 11

'\ ILJ ,l r·J \ ,~ "L-J 1 I

Cal OK

Cal OK

r" ·~~~-rWV\f\1'11"'~····· ~- · -- .. - ··------ ---

Cal OK

V """"'-l'v·"V"V'·r--,, ,• .. /'v'·" -~-------·-·- ..

1- Cal OK T l ---J~~/'''"''"·"·,_,-~----..~. . --~-~----- - -·-·····----.

r: . -__ ___]____ -' I -~---_I. ------·-·-· I I I -·--··-.} ·----

OS~~----'10"-S_ ---~-- ____ 3_s____ _4~---. _ __1L_ _ _§_s _____ _]_s_ 8s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Acoustic (A) 2.13 Hz

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 6.31 Hz 2.44 Hz

l.54E+02 1.32E+02 1.32£+02

0 ( ____ -- 10 100 °1 --------10 100 of~ ... I 10 100 ______ Frequency (Hz) ___________ .. Frc~':'~~cy (Hz) ___ _ . ------~~~e~uency_(~l_

Transverse (T) 6.50 Hz

1.32E+02

10. 100 F~~uency (~&__ _

Page 70: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Banks Well 3.5 ft. deep

File: 00809086.DTB Event Number: 086 Date: 11/17/2000 Time: 12:33 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.06in/s 1.524mm/s @ 7.1Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 8.8Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 13.4Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

\//\

Cal OK

v . ./\{11\f\(' . .J~"-"v~ ,~~~~ ,A,.r-.,,.,, .. , "..~~..-~·· ·~-- ~ -~~ ~. ·- -· . ·····•· ~---- •~-~------------ .. \/\ T

r -~,,:,~~0~ ~,-~~--=:-· --~ ------------~~~~ -~---fL--·---~~=-=s~~~---'2=s 3s 4s . ________ ,i~------ _6s __ 7s _ ---~---'8:.:::s~~-----------i

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

6.38 Hz 2.44 Hz 6.44 Hz 1.37E+02 1.37E+02 1.37E+02

'

.i~-~ I 10 100

oJ)tf~~A~ I 10 100

___ !!~':!~~ncy (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 71: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well (surface - no airblast)

File: 00849025.DTB Event Number: 025 Date: 11/13/2000 Time: 16:04 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): <100 dB

Graph Informatiop Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 26.9Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 20.4Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1 .00 sec intervals

Cal OK A

r-·--Cal OK

~~-~----·

Cal OK

tv __ ~ ....... . ---------------

T

~~~~-~- ~~----- - ---~------------~---------- L--~-~~~-~----~ _____ j.

Os ls 2s ________ )~----- 4s Ss 6s __ -------'::7,--s--::::__~8~,_' ____ _

Acoustic (A) 0.00 Hz

O.OOE+OO

0 -------------- I ------ --

1 10 --__ X~~~~!I~Y_1~iz >

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 21.94 Hz 13.13 Hz

1.65E+Ol l.65E+OI

I

100

Transverse (T) 11.56Hz

l.65E+OI

I

10 Freq\l_~~)'_(_Hz)

100

Page 72: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well 29in.deep

File: 00849025.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB

Event Number: 025 Date: 11/13/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s

Time: 16:04 Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0. 762mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 26.9Hz

Transverse (F): 0.025inls 0.635mm/s @ 20.4Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

rR-~----

r~.,~--- --. lr,.~~JVv'r'--~v·-"·-~------- -- -·····

Cal OK

\/\ \\

Cal OK I\

/ \ \I . \I

Cal OK /\

\/ \

[ -··-------- . l ---··--·. I 1 ________ l ___ ----· I I . ___ ... __ .. _ ____j_____

Os Is _____ 2s ..... ------~----·_4s 5s .. ____ §_~---- _ 7s 8s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 21.94 Hz 13.13 Hz 11.56 Hz

t.65E+OI L65E+Ol L65E+Ol

\ 0 1\!i_. I 10 100

-'--· --~ 10 100

_Xr~~~-I_I~XJ!:'!>. ________ _ Frequency(~) _______ _

Page 73: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

----·---- ----·-···

Ratliff Well

File: 00849026.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB

Event Number: 026 Date: 11114/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 16:18 Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMh/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 13.1 Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (1): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 16.0Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

r-... ·---------· II

R ~~ ~,,,,~~ --~-·

v ['' ·--·-"·''-""'-~··-""···,~~---~-- .. -- _ _.. --- ·-

1

T

t~- --J\MNVW~~=~-~-~----L___ - -~---==~~-~------:------:----- I.

Os Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s

I

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude -Spectrum - Box-Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1 1.00 Hz 9.25 Hz 15.19 Hz

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

___ ] _____ _ 8s

Transverse (T) 15.38Hz

16.03E+OO 3.11E+OI 3.1JE+OI 3.11E+Ol ·------~--.

\

.L 10 100 0 ' Vvvm

1 10 100 100 °1 -· .• -· I -···--·

10 100 _____ F~equency (Hz) Frequency_~!!_~ _____ _ Frequency S~]___ ____________ .. . _ Freque11:cy <_!:!~----- _

Page 74: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

--------------- ------------·- ·-

Ratliff Well 29in.deep

File: 00853078.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 078 Date: 11/14/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 16:18 Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mrnls @ 14.6Hz

Transverse(/'): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 16.0Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R r vJww~c--"

v '''.,1"1/\1\j\!"'J\1\f\/V'"'V'-.,_ •,~ ··- .. ~-~ ~ •

r- ~"~'MN--~·---· I I -- -- -- -~~~-~-----~~~~~~~~~~ _

Os Is 2s _________ 3s- ___ i~-- _______ 5s 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

9.25 Hz 15.31 Hz 9.56 Hz 2.71E+OI 2.71E+Ol 2.71E+Ol

Cal OK \ \/\

Cal OK

\ II\ \/

I

10 Frequency (Hz)

100 - - -- I -------- --~~MM~

10

/-\v/{1 O ( - - --- -- - - - -t'o -___ IJID!~~IOO

100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hzl

Page 75: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

··-

Ratliff Well

File: 00849027 .DTB Event Number: 027 Date: 11/15/2000 Time: 11 :49 Acoustic Trigger: 126 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mrnls Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025inls 0.635mrnls @ 15.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 11.9Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mrnls (1.270mrnls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

..... ---- --------- J I lll __ u_l I II ,-----l_ --~~ J 1 II_ _________ . _____ _

Cal OK

Cal OK

~~------------

Cal OK T

~ N~~NA-,c0~v~--~~-" -' ... - .I ---:~=-----_-______ )_ --L-____ -__ -__ -_-__ --"=---------_--_--: ___ I

r:Os=-----------'l_:::__s ___ ~2s 3s 4s 5s -~s 7~ .. ___ __::8~s ____ _

Acoustic (A) 2.19 Hz

5.54E+Ol

I

lO .. _ -~r~~_uc~~~ (l:l~) _

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

9.06 Hz 13.94 Hz 2.62E+OI 2.62E+Ol

-- I----

100 10 100 ~r~q~~~~~ _qfz)

Transverse (T) 9.50 Hz

2.62E+Ol

I

lO Frequcnc~£!::1~2 _

100

Page 76: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

··- .. --·-····------·--··-------------------- ------------·--·-···--·-·····-·

Ratliff Well 29in.deep

File: 00853079.DTB Event Number: 079 Date: 11/15/2000 Time: 11:48 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.025inls 0.635mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mrnls @ 15.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ ll.lHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R f ~'V'~~' -~--------

1-v l'v~~~---- '"--T

f '="' ~'' VV -~-- - ... _ L ___ . ·- --~--------.L- .. __ .. l ________ . l -------

Qs Is ~!l 3_s______ 4s Ss ___________ §_~-- 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

9.06 Hz 2.50 Hz 9.50 Hz 2.70E+OI 2.70E+OI 2.70E+Ol

!II~ 0 c. ____________ , ____ _ I 10

I

10 100

Cal OK

"\ /\ \.

Cal OK

\1/\

Cal OK

1\ -\ I -\j

100 ___ _ ________ .... ___ _!'!:_C_9_llency (Hz) Frequency (!-Iz) __ _

Page 77: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well

File: 00849028.DTB Event Number: 028 Date: 11/16/2000 Time: 09:07 Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 17 .6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 18.2Hz 0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mmls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK ··----···- 1"\., ___ Jr----~ _____ _

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK T

1- ---A=~=-~-~~--=--···_· __ -_--~- -_____ L_ _____ ------=~~-- ---- --~~~---------~~-~-~~--- .. 1

Os Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 1 Fourier Analysis -(Amplitude spectrum- :Bo-xwili"dow) ---"-'----

1

Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 2.00 Hz 13.75 Hz 13.75 Hz 15.50 Hz

1.37E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol 2.00E+Ol

\ \_; o, 01 _____ - ·· 1'o 100 I

10 100 _ _ -~~<?9l_l:ency (Hzl__ . x~~(juenc~ (li&_ -

Page 78: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well 29in.deep

File: 00853080.DTB Event Number: 080 Date: 11/16/2000 Time: 09:06 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Transverse (T): O.Olin/s 0.508mm/s @ 20.4Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

r~<,--~~~~--- . -------­rY-~,~ ~ -- - -~------

\ /\ \j

Cal OK /\

- \ / \

\/

Cal OK

T A

[-~-=--~ -~-----' -----~- ~- ------L~------'--------------~------ \/ . Os 1 s 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

~·-·- Fourier Analysis (Amplitu(ie-Spectrum~- Box wiD.(fow) _ ____::::::___~----·

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 7.75 Hz 13.81 Hz 13.88 Hz

1.19E+01 1.19E+01 1.19E+OI

j\J~ 0 ------·- -·- I - ···-··-·

1 10

\rrf 0 ·-----.

I O I .. --------- I 'o I

10 100 100 100

... ____ !~~q':'ency (Hz) Fr~_g_u_ency (H~) ____ _ .. _________ Frequenc_y ~Hz)

Page 79: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well

File: 00849029.DTB Event Number: 029 Date: 11116/2000 Time: 16:00 Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 11.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 17 .OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A

f------------------ I~ \11\1 Ill 1!)"""11 .. \ ··--·--L__l"···!···· -1

Cal OK

~R~ - -- --------------

Cal OK

r--~ Cal OK

[~~~":·-~----~-- . .1 I ----~~~~-----1--_-------~----_-_L_____ _-_-J-_ --------------=----------L ... Os Is ~--=2s:_ ______ _b _________ 4s _5_s _____ §~--- 7s Ss ____ _

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.56 Hz 3.12E+Ol

______ , ___ '---!_ =-..... 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 14.88 Hz 15.44 Hz

1.97E+OI 1.97E+Ol

(} ~---- ---- I - --

1 10 100 ---- x~cqu~:ll_~~(}:!z_)

Transverse (T) 15.00Hz

1.97E+Ol

Page 80: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-----------------------

Ratliff Well

File: 00853081.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 081 Date: 11/16/2000 Time: 15:59 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 11.1Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.01in/s 0.254mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Transverse (f): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 17.0Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

r

[::~~---~~~--~---___ -_ l ---- - ~---------_]___ _____ _

Cal OK

1\ , I -\;

Cal OK /1

/ \ \ I -\/

Cal OK

l\ ' I -'\/

Os Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s --- ··------ ---------------------- - --···· ····- ---------------··-· ---=:_____ ____ _

1.20E+OI

0 - -I

I~

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 10.75 Hz 15.75 Hz 9.56 Hz

1.20E+Ol 1.20E+Ol

/

)

1

0 100 °t t'o 100 °1--------- ----t'o- 100 __ Freql!~ncy Jl!") ___________________ _ ~~qll~~cy_(J:I_~~---------------- ___ --------~-reque~cyj~Iz) __ _

Page 81: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well

File: 00849033.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB

Event Number: 033 Date: 11117/2000 Time: 12:15 Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 10.2 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Transverse (1'): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 15.5Hz 0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mmls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals ~---------------------~~-

Cal OK ,'\

/ "\

r"--~~~- -~--~-~­

v t ~~--~----··

T

"" / 'y "/ Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

lo

._···s """' ___ v"_ •. /\/vVv'Is~~~~----··--·""--···-·- . .. ·--··--------------·-·· ·····---···--·--··· ··----- .. -·-··· -----····

····-·---------1-------- l .. _ _ ____ __!__________ .. _ .I._______ I . _ ----- 1 .. _____ _____l_ __ ....

-----'-'"-------------=:2s t';_ 4s _____ 55_ -----~- 7s_ _.c;;.S.o....s __ _

[

- Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

2.81 Hz 10.06 Hz 14.81 Hz 13.50 Hz +01 1.22E+Ol 1.22E+Ol 1.22E+OI

0 t ___ - 10 100 0 ·------·-··I

I 10 100 - ·------··· I

10 100 ........ Fr~.9~~J1C)' Qlz) Freque11~L~Hz) __ _ Freq~~~)'-~ Hz)

Page 82: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

····-· ·---·-·-------·----·-··-·-·-

Ratliff Well 29 in. deep

File: 00853082.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 082 Date: 11/17/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s

Time: 12:14 Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.015inls 0.381mm/s @ 15.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 15.0Hz 0.20inls (O.OSOinls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals ~-------------------~~~~~~~~~~~=-----------~

~ R

· _,_,. "'f'"'\t--..1\/ ...... ··v- ·-... ~· ····~·"-......··~"

·r

Cal OK

/\ \/ .

Cal OK

/\ -\ I \j

Cal OK

/\ -\ I -\/ f ~~~ =' -_¥"_-~L::·_ .. -_·_· ·_· -----'::------ .. L _ ·--·------ -· __ L ______ _________[__ _____ L_ -----~-----

r0S:__ __ _:J=S ___ -=2S 3~- _ _ _____ _±~ ____ 5s -----------~s ____ _______ ]!!_ _____ 8s:____ __

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

7.25 Hz 10.13 Hz 7.88 Hz 1.33E+Ol 1.33E+OI 1.33E+Ol

~ ~ /~ I )\ J~ 01 I .. o, I 01 10 100 10 100

I

10 100 -- .. -- Frcq~~~~X_Lll_~) Frequency (Hz) Fr~qtle~cr_Lt·l") ___________ _

Page 83: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well

File: 00849034.DTB Event Number: 034 Date: 111l7/2000 Time: 12:34 Acoustic Trigger: 106 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Graph Information Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 2.0 Hz Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0 160kPa) Acoustic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 21.3Hz 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 20.4Hz Seismic Scale:

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals ~Transverse (T): 0.035in/s_ 0.889mm/s @ 18.9Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( l.270mm/s/div)

Cal OK v r-~~~~" ·"- --------- --------------- -- ----

Cal OK T

l-=~-~,:-~---~---- -. . . .1·- ~-··_I_ -~~-L. ----· .I-----------~------~--- _I

Os Is 2s_ _)_§___ _ 4_s__ 5.§ ___ . _ _____§_~-- ___ 7s____ 8s '-'----~

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A)

2.13 Hz 1.32E+02

0---· L 1 10 100

... _Freq_~~ncy (J-!z) ___ _

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 6.25 Hz 16.06 Hz

2.54E+OI 2.54E+Ol

I

10 100 _ ___ !:_~~_9~ency (1-I_~----

---------------------- ·-··--··---

Transverse (T) 14.50Hz

2.54E+Ol

O I --·------- .. I 0 I 00

Freqllency (HzL __

Page 84: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Ratliff Well 29 in. deep

File: 00853083.DTB Event Number: 083 Date: 11117/2000 Time: 12:34 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 853

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 7.8Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 12.4Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R -----------

T

r~'~VW"==--==-~-------=- ----· . -

Cal OK I' \ I \\

\/

Cal OK ·\ -\ I\

\/

Cal OK 1\ -\ I ,_

v Os Is 2s__ 4 3s ____ '!,'!___ ________ 5_s ___ §L ___ 7_~------~8~s-------1

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

6.25 Hz - 2.50 Hz 9.94 Hz -~}2.48E+OI 2.48E+OI 2.48E+Ol

(

I

10 ______________ X!t;_queii~Y_(Hz)

100 0 ·- ··-------------------- I -----------

1 10 l•'requency (Hz) __

100 0 . -- ----· ---------------------------- I --------·

I 10 Frequency (Hz)

100

Page 85: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

------- --· -------------

G. Hurley Well

File: 00849036.DTB Event Number: 036 Date: 11120/2000 Time: 13:03 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 2.6 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ ll.3Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 6. 7Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

rTransverse (T): 0.0 15in/s 0.3 81 mm/s ®_ 8.6_H_z ___ .--.~..::..O;c..:.2c:..:O:_in/-'--'s-'-(-'---0-.0;;;,:.5-'---0.;;;.;in/"'-s-'-/d-'-i-'-v)'-----5-.0-8-m::.:m/=--s ( _1._2_70_m_m/_s_/d-iv_) __ ___j

_ Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals _

Cal OK

A

f t~~

(-/~-,--

T

-___ r\ ,.~"--'-L____J'--'\_---- -- , u'

[~·~~-~~--~-~= ----------===~-~=~~ _ I _ --~~=~~-_ _ ~ ~~-==~ --~~-~ I

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Os Is ----~-- ______ }§ _____ ~_ -~_L ____ 6s _ ____:_7"----s ------=8=-s ___ ~---·-j Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

5.90E+Ol

0 -1 ~

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

1.48E+Ol

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 18.19 Hz 5.81 Hz

-- ..... I

10 100 Frequ~ncy (H~l_ ___ _

1.48E+Ol

10 Fr~_gucncx_(~l_z)

100

Transverse (T) 6.50Hz

1.48E+01

- _J /j

0f______ 1'o

Fre_g~e_!l~~-(~lz) 100

Page 86: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

G. Hurley Well 9.5 ft. deep

File: 00809090.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 090 Date: 11/20/2000 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s

Time: 13:03 Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 5.9Hz

Transverse (I): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 9.1Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R ..... ---.,~. ~-- ---- ... - --------------------------- ·-.

__ j______ ..•.. J.. I 1. ..1... 1.. I···-·-

Cal OK /\ -\ I \_

\/

Cal OK

/\ ' I ·­\j

lS 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s -·-·· ·-·-----·-- .. . ·········-------------!

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

6.56 Hz 5.88 Hz 6.19 Hz 1.56E+OI 1.56E+OI 1.56E+OI

I

10 100 01 ------------ 110 100

~ 'vii 0 ------·-· ·- ···-·--- I .

I 10

I 100

____ ----~~~q_IJcnc~--~f!~_L _____________ _ Fn:91J~~~Y (H:r) _____ _ _ _ ___ Xr~g~~n_9, ~Hz)

Page 87: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

G. Hurley Well

File: 00849037.DTB Event Number: 037 Date: 11/20/2000 Time: 16:08 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 119 dB @ 3.3 Hz

(0.18Mb 0.0026psi 0.0180kPa)

Radial (R): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 23.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0. 762mm/s @ 23.2Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: 0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals ~---------------------------------------~~~~~~~- ~~~~--------------~

-··\/'v'n ',• '' ,. \..,_/--' '--, ________________ _ A ~~-------

r-~-- -- --------------­fv --~~-- -~ -----~-

T

___n__ ____________ r t __________ rL ______ _

1:: ~~-~-~=·~-'F~-v-.--. ·- I . ···- __ j ___________ ! ___ ....... I I ______ .L ___ _

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

OS Is - .-0 ______ 3s ---~~- 5s ---~~--------1_?__ 8s ---='-------------... ·------~-

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

6.49E+Ol

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

100

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 2.94 Hz 4.88 Hz

1.52E+OI

0 ~ l

I

lO _}':~<;qu_ency (Hz)

1.52E+OI

I

100 10 100 _ !:~q uen_cy_(!-fz) _ _ __

Transverse (T) 6.50 Hz

l.52E+Ol

0 - ---------- - I

l lO Freq11:cncy _(Hz)

100

Page 88: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

G. Hurley Well 9.5 ft. deep

File: 0080909l.DTB Event Number: 091 Date: 11/20/2000 Time: 16:08 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ O.OHz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.01in/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

. - ···-- -- ... ·-·------

rr ___ "_.,_, __ ,., •' --v" ·---· , __ ....

t ________ __ _____.l_ 1 _ . l . J __________ L___________ 1. . . ..... _____ .1_ ____ _

Cal OK

\ -, I ·-, I \(

Cal OK

\//\

"-"Os:___ __ ____,_,ls:___ __ ~2-s 3s . ________ 4_s_____ Ss 6s _ 7s __ S_s ______ __,

1.63E+OI

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

3.13 Hz 3.13 Hz 3.38 Hz

... -- --------- I

10 Frequency (Hz)

1.63E+Ol

100 °t 11

0 ____________________ ___£requeE~~:JHz).

1.63E+Ol

100 0 ------------------ I

1 10 Frequency (Hz)

100

Page 89: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

G. Hurley Well

File: 00849038.DTB Event Number: 038 Date: 11/20/2000 Time: 16:45 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 849

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381rnmls @ 24.3Hz

I

Vertical (V): 0.01inls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 28.4Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 1 20dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (l.270mm/s/div)

I Time Lines at: 1 .00 sec intervals r-~-------------------------------~==~~~~~~====~------------~

~ Cal OK

A

r---... --··----- II ----"'"L_rl" "1\ .. ·--·-----,---·······

Cal OK

R r-- ~"""-"'~-"~~---

'- Cal OK I

v ~- -----------·--- ----

Cal OK

T

~ ----~~-~--~-=-L- --~~-- --~~-- --~-----~-------__ _1------~~-J--~-~-~-~----()s 1 s 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s ' ·--Fourier Analysis-(Amplitude Spectrum----:-Box Window)-·~-

Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

I 2.25 Hz 18.94 Hz 9.81 Hz 27.06 Hz

9.03E+OO 6.93E+00 6.93E+OO 6.93E+OO

0 --1

I

10 ____ F_r~g_~~~~y_(Hz)

• ---·-- I ---

100 10 100 Frequency qizL ___ _

Page 90: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Sumner Well 5 in. (surface only)

File: 00804072.DTB Event Number: 072 Date: 11/20/2000 Time: I 0:32 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.01in/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (O.OSOin/s/div) 5.08mm/s ( 1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A f --~---

_1_/WIL •. U. I ""I r "I

Cal OK R

r~~-----~---~-------Cal OK

C' - . -. -· ·---·- --------------··---------------------

Cal OK

[-!~"~--~---~-~--------------· ... --- ----------·-·-- ·- -· ·- --------- .. -..

-~ -- -·- -------·-- .1·--····--·-·-·-----_____c~ __ ___.l___ _________ ---·-I --··----L _______ -·- __ .1.. _] ______ _

Os Is 2s __ 3s .. 1-~ _________ S_s __ 6s ________ ?.i_ _____ ~8~s __ _

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.06 Hz Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.63 Hz 1.94 Hz

Transverse (T) 9.44 Hz

2.15E+Ol 1.22E+Ol 1.22E+Ol

/'v\{ 01 ---------t'o 100 0 1"-- ----10 100 01 -------- - -t'o- 100 I

10 100 _ _ _ __ ~f~3_U~~<ry_ (~~-- frequency (Hz) _f~q_~~~C)' (Hz) _ F~~q~cnc_~ ( ~z)

Page 91: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Sumner Well 5 in. (surface only)

File: 00804075.DTB Event Number: 075 Date: 11/20/2000 Time: 16:09 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 804

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 120 dB@ 2.9 Hz

(0.20Mb 0.0029psi 0.0200kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 8.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 16.0Hz

[Vertical (V}: 0.03inls 0.762mrnls @ 7.4Hz

rransver.e (!): 0.03inl' 0.762rnrnl' @ 7.5Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mrnls (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

(- . . . .. rV,.~ .;!\'., -· ., ~ I.

Cal OK

11- lf"""'\....__f'llj_ __ VI.I\ 1 /lil~.r--·""""\111 -----· {1!.

Cal OK I

~R .e.,~~l~IJV'~--------·-·---- .....

t· Cal OK

v f -~"·~·VV' - . ------·---··-·--- -- -·--··· -----·-- --- ------ ..... ~ ... --------·

Cal OK

t=::'~-------Os Is ___ -- 2s · -~~_]~~-~-=-~------14_s___ - ··- -s-s--~~~------~~-~k__·-----ss--"---·--1 Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 3.44 Hz

8.05E+OI 1.00 Hz 4.81 Hz 3.31 Hz

I

10 Frequency (liz)

100

2.60E+01

0 ---1

2.60E+01

- --· I • -··-··- I

10 100 10

Freque!_l~~ (Hz)------· .... Preqll~!_lcy__~!!_z)

2.60E+OI

100

Page 92: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

SPRING 2001

Page 93: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. surface

File: D1SAP00l.DTB Event Number: 001 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 08:41 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mmls Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 2.3 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.38lmmls @ 16.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mmls @ 13.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm!dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08rmn/s (1.270rmn/s/div)

A

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 2.94 Hz

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.06 Hz 3.63 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 9s

Transverse (T) 12.06 Hz

3.34E+OJ 2.49E+Ol 2.49E+OI 2.49E+OI

-~ 10 100 100 100

Frequency (Hz)

Page 94: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP002.DTB Event Number: 002 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 13:51 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 1.3 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial {R): 0.03in/s 0.762mmfs @ lS.OHz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 24.3Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm!dd): 2000111122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

T ·V"'-s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum N Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical {V) Transverse (T)

1.00 Hz 12.56 Hz 2.69 Hz 12.56 Hz 4.45E+OI 2.77E+OI 2.77E+OI 2.77E+Ol

O I ,-------~6-' I 00 °1,_,--~':'--- -'---""'""""''""-

Frequency (Hz)

Page 95: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP003.DTB Event Number: 003 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 17:06 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 2.1 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.015inls 0.381mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 10.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

R

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 2.13 Hz

8.50E+OI

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.31 Hz 3.44 Hz

2.18E+OI 2.18E+OI

10 100 °t Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 12.25 Hz

2.18E+OI

0 t ----· 10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 96: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP004.DTB Event Number: 004 Date: 4/4/01 Time: 11:20 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 1.7 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.05in/s 1.27mm/s @ 12.8Hz Vertical (V): 0.015inls 0.381mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Transverse {T): 0.035inls 0.889mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

V"'-Cal OK

~'~~------------------------------------------------------- V"'-Cal OK

T V"'-1:::-s-------"-:1-s ----------"':;2,_...s--------'3=-s------'-:-4s--~---ss 6s ~- 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.63 Hz 12.81 Hz 1.94 Hz 13.31 Hz 4.79E+OI 6.25E+01 6.25E+OI 6.25E+OI

10 100 °1 ____ , __ -10 100 10 100 100

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 97: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP006.DTB Event Number: 006 Date: 4/5/01 Time: 10:34 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635rnrnls Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.055in/s 1.397mrnls @ 16.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025inls 0.635rnrnls @ 21.3Hz

Transverse (T): 0.045in/s 1.143rnrnls @ 12.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08rnrnls (1.270rnrnls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

v 0 Cal OK

T 0 ~~~-L~-~~~--~~~~~~~~~~----~~~--~----~~-----L---

s Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic {A) Radial {R) Vertical {V) Transverse (T)

1.44 Hz 13.13 Hz 1.75 Hz 13.19 Hz 3.42E+OI 7.79E+OI 7.79E+Ol 7.79E+OI

100 100

Page 98: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP007.DTB Event Number: 007 Date: 4/6/01 Time: 10:22 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.OSin/s 1.27mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Transverse (T): O.OSin/s 1.27mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08rnm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A r--------------.......r-,'L..J~~---..-------- 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

T ~ s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.13 Hz 12.69 Hz 12.81 Hz 7.!3E+OI 7.61E+Ol 7.61E+Ol

0 IL____y_~~f!ffiM!oioollo--.~ 10 100 100

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 12.69 Hz

7.61E+OI

100

Page 99: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP009.DTB Event Number: 009 Date: 4/6/01 Time: 15:43 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB @ 1.9 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.055inls 1.397mm/s @ 13.1Hz

Vertical (V): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 10.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.06in/s 1.524mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

J Cal OK

J Cal OK

J ~----~------~----~------~------~-----·~--~~----~------~--

28 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.38Hz Radial (R) Vertical (V) 11.75 Hz 12.25 Hz

Transverse (T) 12.81 Hz

5.25E+Ol 4.68E+Ol 4.68E+Ol 4.68E+Ol

100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 100: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP019.DTB Event Number: 019 Date: 4/9/01 Time: 12:41 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 1.4 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025inls 0.635mm/s @ 17.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Transverse (T): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (O.OSOinls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

1--v_,"""""""',_.....~-----~--··--------· ~ Cal OK

T ·~ b---~---~--~~---~---~-~~---~--~~---L--

ls 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window)

Acoustic (A) 1.56 Hz

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.13 Hz 12.63 Hz

Transverse (T) 12.63 Hz

8.95E+Ol 3.16E+Ol 3.16E+Ol 3.16E+Ol

100 100

Page 101: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP020.DTB Event Number: 020 Date: 4/9/01 Time: 16:35 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 1.8 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~~~---·~----·---------------------- 0 Cal OK

v 0 Cal OK

0 Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

2.00 Hz 12.94 Hz 2.00 Hz 12.94 Hz 4.1IE+OI 1.81E+Ol 1.81E+Ol l.SIE+Ol

0 (~-~... 100 O I ·- 10 100 O !----------:--'-::--'-'-~'-=

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 102: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP02l.DTB Event Number: 021 Date: 4/10/01 Time: 15:45 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 1.4 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 9.3Hz

Transverse (T): 0.045in/s 1.143mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

-R~-----------·-- ----------------------- J v

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.50 Hz

7.81E+Ol

Cal OK

J Cal OK

J 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

3.26E+OI

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 3.00 Hz 2.81 Hz

3.26E+Ol

Transverse (T) 2.50 Hz

3.26E+Ol

~ ~ ~ lJ;.. lO 100 ° I 10 .M!i'l!lliii.IOO

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 103: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP022.DTB Event Number: 022 Date: 4/10/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 16:53 Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ l3.8Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

-R ~~---·-·~--------------------------- ~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

~ b---~----·-~--~~--~------~--~------~----~~---~-

ls 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s s

Acoustic (A) 1.19 Hz

2.72E+Ol

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.75 Hz 12.69 Hz

S.IOE+Ol S.IOE+Ol

, ~&L .... I 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (f) 13.44 Hz

S.IOE+OI

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 104: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP040.DTB Event Number: 040 Date: 4/11/01 Time: 09:57 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 5.6 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 10.8Hz Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 9.3Hz

Tr:,nsverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 8.6Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK -A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

T ~ ·--~-----L------~----~~----~------~-----~ s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.31 Hz 11.94 Hz 2.31 Hz 3.44 Hz 7.09E+Ol 2.76E+Ol 2.76E+Ol 2.76E+Ol

I

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 105: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP042.DTB Event Number: 042 Date: 4/12/01 Time: 10:37 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 10.4 Hz

(0.10Mb 0.0015psi 0.0100kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 11.6Hz Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ ll.lHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s {1.270mm/s/div)

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

8.38E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 11.56 Hz 2.69 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 9s

Transverse (T) 11.75Hz

5.02E+Ol 5.02E+Ol 5.02E+Ol

--~o·.Jll\\lM!IIIIIMIOO Frequency (Hz)

100

Page 106: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP043.DTB Event Number: 043 Date: 4/12/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 12:22 Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 1.1 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi 0.0100kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 14.2Hz Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 11.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

V"-Cal OK

v V"-Cal OK

T V"-~-----L------L-----~------~------~------L------L---~~----~--

18 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss 9s s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.00 Hz 12.81 Hz 3.50 Hz 1.40E+02 3.52E+Ol 3.52E+Ol

100

Transverse (T) 12.81 Hz

3.52E+Ol

100

Page 107: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Sr. shallow

File: D1SAP046.DTB Event Number: 046 Date: 4/13/01 Time: 10:30 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635nnn/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB @ 4.2 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 11.9Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 15.5Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

v

T

s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.06 Hz 12.88 Hz 2.56 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 12.94 Hz

9.01E+OI 3.59E+OJ 3.59E+OI 3.59E+Ol

10 100 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 108: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP003.DTB Event Number: 003 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 08:40 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 3.8 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi 0.0100kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 16.0Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mmls @ 12.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 2.88 Hz

2.79E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.63 Hz 3.88 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

.. --- J Cal OK

J Cal OK

J 9s

Transverse (T) 12.06 Hz

2.41E+Ol 2.41E+Ol 2.41E+Ol

10 100 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 109: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP004.DTB Event Number: 004 Date: 4/3/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s

Time: 13:50 Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025inls 0.635mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (1): O.OJin/s 0.762mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

3.94E+OI

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

J Cal OK

J Cal OK

J 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

2.58E+Ol

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.75 Hz 3.94 Hz

2.58E+Ol

Transverse (T) 12.56 Hz

2.58E+Ol

10 100 ° r---~~o- 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 110: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: DlDAP005.DTB Event Number: 005 Date: 4/4/01 Time: 11:19 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635nun/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 2.1 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015inls 0.381mm/s @ 16.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.045in/s 1.143mmls @ 13.1Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270nun/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

-v V"'-Cal OK

T ~ s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.69 Hz 13.31 Hz 1.69 Hz 12.88 Hz 3.73E+OI 6.28E+OI 6.28E+OI 6.28E+OI

100 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 111: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP006.DTB Event Number: 006 Date: 4/5/01 Time: 10:33 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Transverse (T): O.OSin/s 1.27mmls @ 15.0Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

F Cal OK

v F Cal OK

T F ~s------~~-s----~2-s----~3~s----~4~s------~Ss------~6-s---~~7~s----~8~s-------~---

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

3.84E+OI

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 13.25 Hz 14.81 Hz 13.13 Hz

7.64E+OI 7.64E+Ol 7.64E+OI

100 100

Page 112: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP007.DTB Event Number: 007 Date: 4/6/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 10:21 Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035inls 0.889mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 17.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.05in/s 1.27mm/s @ 12.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A ~------------------~.~~~.~~------~-------------- 0

Cal OK

'V IV' ~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

~ b----------';--------';o------.J .J...------';;;------';:;:-------';:;------Q_s Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.06 Hz 12.75 Hz 12.06 Hz 12.75 Hz 6.68E+OI 7.61E+Ol 7.61E+Ol 7.61£+01

-

0- ~~~~Ill o-·~J~ v...... o-A~ .. I o~ll 1 10 100 1 10 100 1 10 100 I 10 100

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 113: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

File: D1DAP008.DTB Event Number: 008 Date: 4/6/01 Time: 15:42 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mmls Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 2.7 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.05in/s 1.27mmls @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mmls @ 18.9Hz

Transverse (T): 0.06in/s 1.524mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08mmls (1.270mmls/div)

A

v

-T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.94 Hz

6.02E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.75 Hz 12.13 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 9s

Transverse (T) 10.19 Hz

4.06E+Ol 4.06E+Ol 4.06E+Ol

10 100 °! 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 114: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP015.DTB Event Number: 015 Date: 4/9/01 Time: 12:40 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635nnn/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 1.5 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mrnls @ 15.5Hz Vertical (V): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (1): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 12.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

V"'-Cal OK

v '~ Cal OK

V"'-b-----~ls------~2-s,----·~------~4s------~5-s----~6~s----~7~s------~8s------~9-s-

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

8.89E+OI 1.50 Hz 14.00 Hz 13.06 Hz 12.38 Hz

2.36E+Ol

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

2.36E+OI

0 ~-~~ ----·------'.<1 o=---"'"'-·-'--'"""""~

Frequency (Hz)

2.36E+Ol

Page 115: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP016.DTB Event Number: 016 Date: 4/10/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 15:44 Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 1.6 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 13.8Hz Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 9.3Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025inls 0.635mrnls @ 12.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mrnls (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

R

v

2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

2.19 Hz 15.31 Hz 2.75 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

yA-Cal OK

yA-Cal OK

yA-9s

Transverse (T) 13.00 Hz

7.49E+OI 2.09E+OI 2.09E+OI 2.09E+OI

-~-~-·~~,!~.

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 116: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP017.DTB Event Number: 017 Date: 4/10/01 Time: 16:52 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635nun/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508nun/s @ 17.0Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254nun/s @ O.OHz

Transverse {T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mmls (1.270nun/s/div.)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

~~A~------------~---~-------------------------------------- 0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~~~-----~---------------------------------------------------------- ~

Cal OK

~-~---------------------··--------------------------------- ~ k>s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.13 Hz

~''" oi.L-~~10M~~10o Frequency (Hz)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.44 Hz 13.19 Hz

4.09E+Ol 4.09E+Ol

0 ~0-~-f\.c~~~ I 10 100

0 .__/~A l 10 100

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 12.81 Hz

4.09E+OI

O _ /\MMl<i ~AI. ... I 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

Page 117: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

File: D1DAP026.DTB Event Number: 026 Date: 4/12/01 Time: 10:36 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 10.0 Hz

(0.10Mb 0.0015psi 0.0100kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (V): O.OlSinls 0.381mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20inls (O.OSOinls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

7.83E+OI

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 10.88 Hz 10.69 Hz 11.63 Hz

5.24E+OJ 5.24E+OI 5.24E+OI

100 100 10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 118: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP027.DTB Event Number: 027 Date: 4/12/01 Time: 12:21 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 1.3 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.015inls 0.381mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 8.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 12.4Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270rmn/s/div)

-A

v

Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

J.24E+02

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 15.13 Hz 3.75 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 12.75 Hz

3.39E+Ol 3.39E+Ol 3.39E+Ol

100 10 100 lO 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 119: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dear Sr. deep

File: D1DAP028.DTB Event Number: 028 Date: 4/13/01 Time: 10:29 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB@ 5.0 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.Ol5inls 0.381mm/s @ 17.6Hz

Vertical (V}: O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mmls @ 12.1Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

~ Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s ---'::-7s-~-'ss~--9g----"

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

9.31£+01 1.13 Hz 13.00 Hz 2.50 Hz 12.94 Hz

10 Frequency (Hz)

3.55£+01 3.55£+01 3.55£+01

100

Page 120: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP005.DTB Event Number: 005 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 08:38 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 5.4 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02Sin/s 0.635mm/s @ lS.SHz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 20.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK -A

--..1\...-·,---------"---~-----~- 0 Cal OK

v0 Cal OK

1--'v'-----"'~~'--"-'~---~--····-···----------------·--~ .. ~~~~~~- v0

Acoustic (A) 2.94 Hz

3.82E+OI

Cal OK

v0 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 11.94 Hz 20.13 Hz

1.99E+Ol 1.99E+Ol

0 i-·- -----'--:-'::1 0:-----'="""""""':

Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 15.19 Hz

1.99E+OI

Page 121: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP007.DTB Event Number: 007 Date: 4/3/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 13:48 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): ll 0 dB @ 1.6 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.01in/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mmls (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

.~~-J

Cal OK v J

Cal OK

J Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

6.27E+OI

1.00 Hz 13.19 Hz 21.69 Hz 16.56 Hz 2.82E+Ol

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

2.82E+Ol

01 --·----......L..-'-1 o....:........:..L.!.!!..,.,_ Frequency (Hz)

2.82E+OI

Page 122: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP008.DTB Event Number: 008 Date: 4/3/01 Time: 17:03 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 3.8 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mmls @ 13.1Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.381nun/s @ 8.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 2.06 Hz

8.64E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.81 Hz 3.63 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 9s

Transverse (T) 7.56 Hz

2.07E+Ol 2.07E+OI 2.07E+OI

Page 123: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP010.DTB Event Number: 010 Date: 4/4/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 11:18 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 2.0 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.045in/s 1.143mm/s @ 11.9Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ lO.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

-v

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

-~-~~-~---"-- J Cal OK

~~~--------------------------------~· J Cal OK

T J s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.06 Hz 13.25 Hz 21.06 Hz 16.00 Hz 3.66E+Ol 5.81E+Ol 5.81E+Ol 5.81E+Ol

10 100 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 124: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP011.DTB Event Number: 011 Date: 4/5/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 10:31 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.08in/s 2.032mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 18.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 17.6Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~~~~---·---·-·------··-------·· ~

Cal OK

~--v...,.,..,..,..~"""""'~"""""""""~..._....._---------------.. -·----------··--~

Cal OK T ~

1;;----------·________j_.__..·---"=---------'=--__ ___,,-----___ .J..._ __ ___l_,----__ _[_ ____ ~,---__ ~_

Os Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.00 Hz 5.23E+OI

~

~~" 01~~~~1~0~~~100 Frequency (Hz)

I.06E+02

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.06 Hz 21.81 Hz

1.06E+02

100 oh'~- .. ,

1 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 13.19 Hz

1.06E+02

o~···' 1 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

Page 125: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP012.DTB Event Number: 012 Date: 4/6/01 Time: 10:19 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.OSSin/s 1.397mm/s @ 13.8Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 24.3Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 15.0Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

s

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

111~~--~---··-···---··---~-·-------· .. ----~ ~

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ ...........J-:--------'::o-----'::c----__..J_,-------------'-=---...........J--:-----~---~---~-

ls 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Acoustic (A) 1.06 Hz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.88 Hz 21.94 Hz

Transverse (f) 12.94 Hz

9.28E+OI 5.99E+Ol 5.99E+OI 5.99£+01

10 100 100 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 126: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP013.DTB Event Number: 013 Date: 4/6/01 Time: 15:40 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 6.4 Hz

(O.lOMb 0.0015psi 0.0100k:Pa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.05inls 1.27mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.03in!s 0.762mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (1): O.OSSin/s 1.397mmls @ 14.6Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

-J Cal OK

v -J Cal OK

~T~~I\AI WMM~~~------~--~~---------------------------------·------- -J s Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.94 Hz 12.94 Hz 20.13 Hz 12.81 Hz 6.38E+Ol 4.52E+Ol 4.52E+Ol 4.52E+Ol

Page 127: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP016.DTB Event Number: 016 Date: 4/9/01 Time: 12:39 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 9.3 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 13.1Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

v

1-o----~-----L..~~~-'-=-~~-----",-----~~____L_~~~'-=-'-'--·........L....., __ ~ Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.50 Hz 12.38 Hz 20.38 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 12.88 Hz

8.08E+Ol 3.14E+Ol 3.14E+Ol 3.14E+OI

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 128: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP018.DTB Event Number: 018 Date: 4/10/01 Time: 15:42 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 6.4 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mrn/s @ 10.8Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 17.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 18.2Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

T

b-~--~~~--~----~~----~------l-~~~~----~ Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss s

Acoustic (A) l.OOHz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 15.63 Hz 2.88 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 15.38 Hz

8.97E+OI 4.27E+OI 4.27E+OI 4.27E+Ol

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 129: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP024.DTB Event Number: 024 Date: 4/11101 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 09:54 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 119 dB@ 7.4 Hz

(0.18Mb 0.0026psi 0.0180kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (JI): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in!s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

"v

T

Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.31 Hz

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum -Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

3.56 Hz 2.25 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

V"-Cal OK

-~ Cal OK

V"-9s

Transverse (T) 2.25 Hz

7.84E+OI 5.77E+OO 5.77E+OO 5.77E+OO

0 1 ~,~- -·~t- 100 oll...-...---~::-'-::o___:_.':...'..'!_J.]

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 130: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP025.DTB Event Number: 025 Date: 4/12/01 Time: 10:35 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 119 dB@ 10.6 Hz

(0.18Mb 0.0026psi 0.0180kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 7.1Hz

Transverse (T): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270rmnls/div)

A

v

T

Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

1.07E+02

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~------·-- ~

3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 11.56 Hz 11.75 Hz

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 10.94 Hz

3.84E+Ol 3.84E+Ol 3.84E+Ol

100

Page 131: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP026.DTB Event Number: 026 Date: 4/12/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 12:20 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 1.1 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 21.3Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

1.83E+02

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.69 Hz 22.13 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~-Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 16.56 Hz

3.37E+Ol 3.37E+Ol 3.37E+Ol

100 100

Page 132: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP027.DTB Event Number: 027 Date: 4/12/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 17:02 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 3.1 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.63Smmls @ 13.4Hz Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.50 Hz

6.53E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s Ss

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.38 Hz 2.94 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 9s

Transverse (T) 15.50 Hz

1.53E+Ol 1.53E+Ol 1.53E+Ol

Page 133: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. surface

File: D2SAP030.DTB Event Number: 030 Date: 4/13/01 Time: 10:27 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB @ 2.5 Hz

(0.10Mb 0.0015psi O.OlOOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 12.8Hz Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ 23.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.015in/s 0.38lmm/s @ 19.6Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

v

T

~s------~ls----~----~3~s------~4s------~5~s----~6~s-----~7~s------~8s----

Acoustic (A) 1.06 Hz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 12.88 Hz 2.56 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0

Transverse (T) 2.50 Hz

1.18E+02 4.66E+OI 4.66E+OI 4.66E+OI

01~0 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 134: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. deep

File: D2WAP005.DTB Event Number: DDS Date: 4/3/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 17:03 Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB @ 3.9 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.OOSin/s 0.127mrnls @ O.OHz

Vertical (V): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

R

-v

T

~--- .~~----~~--~~-~--~----~--·---L-1 s 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s s

Acoustic (A) 2.06 Hz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

3.50 Hz 3.00 Hz

Cal OK

0 CalLow

0 Cal OK

0 CalLow

0 9s

Transverse (T) 2.06Hz

7.12E+OI 1.23E+Ol 1.23E+Ol I.23E+OI

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 135: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. deep

File: D2WAP011.DTB Event Number: 011 Date: 4/10/01 Time: 15:42 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB@ 6.4 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.005in/s 0.127mrnls @ O.OHz

Vertical (V): 0.005in/s 0.127mrnls @ O.OHz Transverse (T): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz Calibration Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~---·--~---~---- ~ Cal OK

f.-'---v --~----~-------·-- ~

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

8.02E+OJ

Cal Low

~ 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

2.50 Hz 3.00 Hz J.29E+OI 1.29E+01

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 2.56 Hz

1.29E+01

100

Page 136: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. deep

File: D2W AP032.DTB Event Number: 032 Date: 4/11101 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s

Time: 09:54 Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 7.5 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (JI): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000111122

0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A} 1.31 Hz

6.32E+OI

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum w Box Window) Radial (R} Vertical (V)

2.31 Hz 2.38 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 CalLow

0 9s

Transverse (T) 2.06 Hz

1.71E+Ol 1.7IE+OI 1.7IE+OI

100

Page 137: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. deep

File: D2WAP033.DTB Event Number: 033 Date: 4/12/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 10:34 Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB@ 11.1 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (JI): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (1): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

R

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

9.09E+Ol

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

~~~~·~.~-------------------------------- 0 Cal OK

0 Cal OK

0 CalLow

0 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.94 Hz 5.25 Hz 2.10E+OI 2.10E+Ol

0~"'" I 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 3.00 Hz

2.10E+Ol

10 100 Frequency (Hz)

Page 138: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Dean Jr. deep

File: D2W AP034.DTB Event Number: 034 Date: 4/12/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 17:01 Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB @ 3.1 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (V): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.OOSin/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.44 Hz

5.91E+OI

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

J CalLow

~ 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

5.88E+OO

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 2.88 Hz 3.13 Hz

5.88E+OO

Transverse (T) 3.19 Hz

5.88E+OO

10 100 °tl----~00 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 139: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

------ ·---·---·

West Virginia Abbott 1 shallow

File: A1SAP016.DTB Event Number: 016 Date: 04/16/2001 Time: 16:50 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 1.8 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.065inls 1.651mm/s @ 28.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.075in/s 1.905mm/s @ 32.0Hz

Transverse (f): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 12.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (O.OSOin/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A t ~~~ -~---~- •"\v ,,,•,," '•,

Cal OK

~~--- - - ---~~~-~~ --~~-··-·-··-····------------.. -·-----~---~---.--

Cal OK

~~- ~ ~-~ Cal OK

T F"-- """"'vq/yti'W\f'~e• .. '

t ... -- .. ······-·--·--·-----1------··-------- .... l .... . . .1. .. .! _ _ __ .. ) ________ _____L__ _______ I l .l .. _

Os ls 2s 3s 4s ?~------~--6_s 7~ __________ 8s_·· __ _:9:..::.s _______ -----i

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.69Hz 3.14E+OI

~~ 10 100

Frequency (Hz)

3.48E+OI

0 - .. I

Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T) 14.00Hz 14.75 Hz 21.63 Hz

3.48E+Ol 3.48E+OI

··-··-··--· I ·--------------

10 100 0 1 -t'o---- -- 100 t'o--Frequency (Hz) -----~~quency _(~) ________________ _!'~g':'-ency (Hz)

100

Page 140: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 deep

File: A1DAP004.DTB Event Number: 004 Date: 4/16/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025inls 0.635mm/s

Time: 16:50 Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 3.2 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025inls 0.635mm/s @ 26.9Hz

Vertical (V): 0.04in/s 1.016mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 25.6Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2000/11122

0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270mm/s/div)

v

·T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.56 Hz

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.94 Hz 14.63 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

J Cal OK

J Cal OK

J 9s

Transverse (T) 14.81 Hz

3.71E+OI 2.10E+Ol 2.10E+Ol 2.10E+Ol

01 ·--~~··-·~10~~ ... Frequency (Hz)

10 Frequency (Hz)

Page 141: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 shallow

File: A1SAP026.DTB Event Number: 026 Date: 4/18/01 Time: 16:51 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 2.8 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 23.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 26.9Hz

Transverse (T): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 10.8Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

·0 Cal OK

~------------------~~------------------------------ ~ Cal OK

~ 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.38 Hz 8.56 Hz 24.56 Hz 8.13 Hz 5.38£+01 2.98£+01 2.98£+01 2.98£+01

10 100 Frequency (H:t:)

Page 142: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 shallow

File: A1SAP027.DTB Event Number: 027 Date: 4/18/01 Time: 16:54 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mmls @ 19.6Hz

Vertical (V): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.015inls 0.381mmls @ 12.8Hz

Calibration Date (yyyy!mm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (O.OSOin/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

T ~ , ___ , __ l ----L..---.---1.--

s Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.06 Hz 15.06 Hz 7.13 Hz Transverse (T)

14.75 Hz 2.8 1.68E+OI I.68E+OI 1.68E+OI

Page 143: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 deep

File: A1DAP006.DTB Event Number: 006 Date: 4/18/01 Time: 16:51 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 117 dB @ 3.3 Hz

(0.14Mb 0.0020psi 0.0140kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 10.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381nun/s @ 21.3Hz

Transverse (T): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm/dd): 2000111122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A ·0

Cal OK

-----------------------------------------------·-------···-----~ v

Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.44 Hz

4.47E+OI

3s 4s Ss 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

8.25 Hz 24.13 Hz

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 8.56 Hz

1.37E+Ol 1.37E+Ol 1.37E+Ol

Page 144: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 shallow

File: AISAP028.DTB Event Number: 028 Date: 4/19/01 Time: 08:55 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 3.1 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 24.3Hz Vertical (V): 0.035in/s 0.889mm/s @ 28.4Hz Transverse (T): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 23.2Hz

Calibration Date (yyyyimmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270nun/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

~ b---~·ls __ , __ _j2::o-s---':c-3s-----'-:4,-s -~--1:5:--s-· 6s l::-7s----':::8-s -------';9:--s-

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.06 Hz 15.13 Hz 23.63 Hz 4.62E+Ol 2.56E+Ol 2.56E+Ol

Transverse (T) 14.81 Hz

2.56E+Ol

Page 145: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 deep

File: A1DAP007.DTB Event Number: 007 Date: 4/19/01 Time: 08:55 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1782

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB @ 5.5 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (JI): 0.025in/s 0.635mmls @ 22.2Hz Transverse (T): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Calibration Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270nun/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A

T

s Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

2.94 Hz 5.13 Hz 23.56 Hz

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ 9s

Transverse (T) 15.06 Hz

3.04E+OI 1.37E+OI 1.37E+Ol 1.37E+OI

Page 146: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 1 shallow

File: A1SAP033.DTB Event Number: 033 Date: 4/19/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635rnrnls

Time: 16:52 Serial Number: 1781

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB @ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 9.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02Sin/s 0.635mm/s @ 22.2Hz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.63Smm/s @ 12.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270rnrnls/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

~ Cal OK

v ~ Cal OK

-T ~ s Is 2s 3s 4s Ss 6s 7s Ss 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

3.31 Hz 1.94 Hz 3.94 Hz 24.75 Hz 3.91E+Ol 1.91E+OI 1.91E+OI 1.91E+OI

I 0 I 00 O 1;-----.el,--'-=~

Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 147: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 2 shallow

File: A2NS4020.DTB Event Number: 020 Date: 4116/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s

Time: 16:49 Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 112 dB@ 2.5 Hz

(0.08Mb 0.0012psi 0.0080kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 30.1Hz

Vertical (V): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 39.3Hz

Transverse (1): 0.03Sin/s 0.889mm/s @ 30.1Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK

-J Cal OK

-v -J Cal OK

-~-------~----------~--------------------------------------- -J ~--'-=------.L..__

Is 2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s s Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window)

Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 1.75 Hz 14.63 Hz 14.50 Hz

Transverse (T) 29.19 Hz

6.21E+Ol 1.55E+OI 1.55E+Ol 1.55E+OI

Page 148: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 2 deep

File: A2SP4017.DTB Event Number: 017 Date: 4/16/01 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635nun/s

Time: 16:45 Serial Number: 1780

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 2.6 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial {R): 0.005in/s 0.127mm/s @ O.OHz

Vertical (V): O.OOinls O.OOmm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse {T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 34.1Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000111122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

A ----~.........1~.......1'

Cal OK

~-..........------~~~~ 0

v

T

s Is 2s

Acoustic (A) 1.69 Hz

4.36E+Ol

CalLow

Cal Low

Cal OK

V"· 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window)

l.llE+Ol

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 1.50 Hz 0.00 Hz

l.llE+Ol

Transverse (T) 3.25 Hz

l.IIE+Ol

01 ·- - ··· 10 1 oo 0 t: .. -------"-~w:----'----------'""'~ Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 149: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

West Virginia Abbott 2 shallow

File: A2NS4072.DTB Event Number: 072 Date: 4/18/01 Time: 16:50 Acoustic Trigger: 114 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s Serial Number: 1779

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 3.3 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 9.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div) Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 25.6Hz Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 28.4Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 28.4Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/11122

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div) Time Lines at: 1.00 sec intervals

Cal OK R 0

Cal OK v 0

Cal OK T 0 k-s:-----~1-s ---~2-s -------J,3;-s __ ___j47s---l.:-5s---1:;-6s----';;7:--s -------1:8::--s·---99·-

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (f)

3.00 Hz 26.44 Hz 14.75 Hz 8.25 Hz 7.42E+OI 1.28E+Ol 1.28E+Ol 1.28E+Ol

oll---_l~!m~~IOO 01~---~10~-~~ 10 100 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 150: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

FALL 2001

Page 151: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Sumner

File: 608@@135.DTA Event Number: 135 Date: 9/21101 Time: 14:25 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02inls 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 125 dB@ 5.5 Hz

(0.34Mb 0.0049psi 0.0340kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 125dB 0.36Mb (0.090Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 14.2Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 7.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 20.4Hz 0.20inls (0.050inls/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal OK A ~0

Cal OK

V" v

Cal OK

1--'T'------~~ V" .....J

.00s 0.50s I.OOs l.50s 2.00s 2.50s 3.00s 3.50s 4.00s 4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum~ Box Window) Acoustic (A) Radial (R) Vertical (V) Transverse (T)

1.25 Hz 2. 75 Hz 2.88 Hz 3.00 Hz 7.44E+01

0 1---· ·1:'=-o---'----"'-"'.,_,

Frequency (Hz)

3.54E+01 3.54E+Ol 3.54E+01

10 100 °1 Frequency (Hz)

Page 152: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Sumner

File: 608@@144.DTA Event Number: 144 Date: 9/24/01 Time: 13:53 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 100 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.02Mb 0.0003psi 0.0020kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 4.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508mm/s @ 4.1Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 14.6Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

T

.OOs 0.50s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

1.95E+OO

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ . ...,..I"""'.o-::-os----":---I.=so,---s----':2:-:.o::c::o-s ---~:::2-.5--0s-----~:::-3.=oo,---s----':3c-:.5::-::::0-s --~4""".o~os· _________.j4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

2.13 Hz 1.88 Hz 2.62E+OI 2.62E+OI

Transverse (T) 15.25 Hz

2.62E+OI

01 L_ __ __J_I 0~ I 00 O ,_I -- I 0 100 10 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

Page 153: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Sumner

File: 608@@145.DTA Event Number: 145 Date: 9/25/01 Time: 12:37 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): <100 dB

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div) Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381nun/s @ 6.8Hz

Vertical (V): 0.02inls 0.508nun/s @ 2.8Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 11.6Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08nun/s (1.270nun/s/div)

A

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

V" Cal OK

V" Cal OK

V" ------L~- ·~---7-;~----':---;;;-,-------'::--::c::----------.l:-=----':o--:::-:::--------':o--;;-;o--· ~---.--L--,--- ______J

O.SOs l.OOs !.50s 2.00s 2.50s 3.00s 3.50s 4.00s 4.50s

Acoustic (A) O.OOHz

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1.63 Hz 1.75 Hz Transverse (T)

2.75 Hz O.OOE+OO 3.45E+OI 3.45E+Ol 3.45E+Ol

·-:'::---...... ...! 10 100 100

Frequency (Hz)

Page 154: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Sumner

File: 608@@146.DTA Event Number: 146 Date: 9/25/01 Time: 15:44 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 809

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 116 dB@ 1.5 Hz

(0.12Mb 0.0017psi 0.0120kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.015in/s 0.381mm/s @ 34.1Hz

Vertical (V): O.Olin/s 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 23.2Hz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

A

v

Acoustic (A) 1.88Hz

B.OOE+OI

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal Low

0 Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ Cal OK

~ I.OOs 1.50s 2.00s 2.50s 3.00s 3.50s 4.00s 4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum- Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V) 20.00 Hz 15.38 Hz

9.95E+OO 9.95E+OO

Transverse (T) 13.75 Hz

9.95E+OO

Page 155: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Hurley

File: 813@@065.DTA Event Number: 065 Date: 9/21/01 Time: 15:20 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 813

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 118 dB@ 6.7 Hz

(0.16Mb 0.0023psi 0.0 160kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 9.4Hz

Vertical (V): 0.015in/s 0.381nun/s @ 34.1Hz

Transverse (T): 0.03in/s 0.762mm/s @ 23.2Hz 0.20in/s (O.OSOin/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal OK A 0

Cal OK

0 Cal OK

v 0 Cal OK

-~~---~--------------------~------- 0 0.50s

Acoustic (A) l.OOHz

4.54E+OI

0!--1--~ 10

Frequency (Hz)

l.OOs !.50s 2.00s 2.50s 3.00s 3.50s 4.00s 4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

3.25 Hz 3.25 Hz 2.47E+Ol 2.47E+Ol

to wo 01

Frequency (Hz)

Transverse (T) 3.25 Hz

2.47E+Ol

Page 156: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Kentucky Hurley

File: 813@@066.DTA Event Number: 066 Date: 9/22/01 Time: 11:43 Acoustic Trigger: 120 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 813

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s @ 16.5Hz

Vertical (V}: O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz

Transverse (T): O.Olinls 0.254mm/s @ O.OHz 0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal Low A

Cal OK

-~~-------------------------------------------------- 0 v

-T

.oos O.SOs

Acoustic (A) 1.25 Hz

8.64E+OO

Frequency (Hz)

CalLow

0 Cal OK

0 l.OOs l.SOs .L2-,.0c:-o0-s -----':::-2....,..50-=-s------'3::-.o=o:-s-· 3.50s 4.00s 4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window) Radial (R) Vertical (V)

1. 75 Hz 1.50 Hz 1.26E+Ol 1.26E+Ol

Transverse (T) 2.00 Hz

1.26E+Ol

Page 157: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

WINTER2001

Page 158: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Dean Jr. Well- surface transducer

File: 0 1769224.DTB Event Number: 224 Date: 12/04/2001 Time: 16:44 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1769

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 106 dB@ 0.0 Hz

(0.04Mb 0.0006psi 0.0040kPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale:

Radial (R): 0.0325in/s 0.8255mm/s @ 13.4Hz

Vertical (f-): 0.025in/s 0.635mm/s @ 19.6Hz

Transverse (T): 0.0325in/s 0.8255mm/s @ 18.9Hz Calibration Date (yyyylmmldd): 2000/09/22

0.20inls (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

Cal OK A r------ ... __ _r-....J

1.1 1rL .• ---A..._r--·ll 11"------;r 1 - 11 f""t..~.----c..J"""\ •. II .• l...~r--·· 11!1\_J-

Cal OK

1R~~ --~"V'-~~~-~~~\NV\N~~------------- --- ---

Cal OK v f --~--~-~-~~~--~

Cal OK T

~~--' --vv--~"--~~~~--J\;-~N·~:::;~JV=--0~hr_·~:/'--'~/=-~h- --/-~--=----- - ~~~-~~---- -----~~-- _J ------

O.OOs 0.50s_ l.OOs 1.50s 2.00:>_____ 2.50s 3.0Qs__ 3,?0s 4.00s I

4.50s

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window) Acoustic (A)

1.00 Hz 2.36E+Ol

01____ ·--- __ tlo _____ --

Frequency _(Hz)

6.76E+Ol

100

--------------

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 13.13 Hz 17.00 Hz

I

10 ~r~quency (I:J-:;z)

6.76E+Ol

100

Transverse (T) 13.13 Hz

6.76E+Ol

0 ;\_/~ I_

I 10 100 F~g_uency (H0 __ _

Page 159: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Dean Jr. Well- surface transducer

File: 01769229.DTB Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB

Event Number: 229 Date: 12/05/2001 Time: 16:46 Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1769

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 110 dB@ 3.8 Hz

(0.06Mb 0.0009psi 0.0060kPa)

Radial (R): 0.03inls 0.762mm/s @ 12.1Hz

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (0.050Mb/div)

Seismic Scale: Vertical (V): 0.0125in/s 0.3175mm/s @ 17.0Hz

Transverse (T): 0.0325in/s 0.825Smm/s @ 15.5Hz Calibration Date (yyyy/mmldd): 2000/09/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals ---~

Cal OK A r----

Cal OK R ~- - ~~-·v~-- NV\~ -~---- -- ------ --- ------

Cal OK V ~--· -------------~- -- .. ---- --~--------------------- --- .. -- ---- ---------- ---- -- -----------

Cal OK T

~-- ·• _.__.,_. .• _ .. -. .• .--.__j\_1'-•. r"v"'-..--v"'r----·------- -- ---- · -------- -----• .. - -

l_____ --L ... 1 _____ ______l____ ..... ___.1_________ I·--····--·-- I ---~-..1 ___ __j

,.o._OO""s __ _;o'-'--'.5---"-0-'---s ---=-I.=OOs --~- ~-QOs __________ 2.50s ______ J,OOs __ l_.50s___ 4.00s 4.50s

Acoustic (A) 1.00 Hz

6.91E+Ol

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum - Box Window)

3.89E+Ol

Radial (R) Vertical (V) 11.38 Hz 2.88 Hz

3.89E+Ol

Transverse (T) 13.25 Hz

3.89E+Ol

.~1»L .JJ . 100 I 10 100 1 10

__ ~-- _ _ Freq~~l_lc:¥_lf::!!l)__ _ _ _________ __ Frequ~:_~c,Y(Hz) 100

Page 160: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Dean Jr. Well - surface transducer

File: 0 1769230.DTB Event Number: 230 Date: 12/05/2001 Time: 16:50 Acoustic Trigger: 142 dB Seismic Trigger: 0.02in/s 0.508mm/s Serial Number: 1769

Amplitudes and Frequencies Acoustic (A): 114 dB@ 1.6 Hz

(0.1 OMb 0.00 15psi 0.01 OOkPa)

Graph Information Duration: 0.000 sec To: 4.500 sec

Acoustic Scale: 120dB 0.20Mb (O.OSOMb/div)

Seismic Scale: Radial (R): 0.0525in/s 1.3335mm/s @ 16.0Hz

Vertical (V): 0.0325inls 0.8255mm/s @ 10.0Hz

Transverse (I'): 0.0375in/s 0.9525mm/s @ 14.6Hz

Calibration Date (yyyylmm!dd): 2000/09/22

0.20in/s (0.050in/s/div) 5.08mm/s (1.270mm/s/div)

1 ..

'

Time Lines at: 0.50 sec intervals

v ~ - ~-~-~,-~~"''0'-~~------.JV'-~~-"-~ ~- -- - -

T

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

Cal OK

I f:-----_- -:::~~-~=~-,0-~~~~:-r ":'~Nv\;=:-~-~--~-'~-~--~~'~~\1\:~p/~- -__ ~--~~-- ___ , O.OOs O.SOs l.OQ_s_ _____ _l_.:SOs 2.00s 2_.50s _ 3.!J_!)§ ___ 3.?~-- __ 4~.0~0so:___ 4.50s

Acoustic (A) 1.50 Hz

5.81E+Ol

0 --1

frequency_( Hz)

Fourier Analysis (Amplitude Spectrum ~ Box Window) Transverse (T)

16.25 Hz Radial (R) Vertical (V) 16.25 Hz 2.88 Hz

l.IOE+02 1.10E+02 l.lOE+02

100

Page 161: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix B

Laboratory Analysis Results

Page 162: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87 401

Date: 11/29/00

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Lab ID: 0300W04998 - 5000

Project: Norton, VA

Dear Client:

The samples were received for analysis at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (IML), Farmington, New Mexico. Enclosed are the results of these analyses.

Comment:

Analytical results were obtained by approved methods. Sample analyses were obtained within the method specific holding times. Practical Quantitation Limits (POL's) are based on method requirements, and any dilutions necessary to maintain proper method response without matrix interference.

If you have any questions, please call me at (505) 326-4737.

William Lipps IML-Farmington, NM

Page 163: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lm1 Phone (505) 326-4737

Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fax (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

RATLIFFE 1

0300W04998

Water

Cool/Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

448

4

109

<0.05

4.17

0.36

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

2

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/10/00

Date Reported: 11/29/00

Date Sampled: 11/09/00

Time Sampled: 1115

EPA 160.2 11/13/00 1455 FP

EPA 160.2 11/10/00 1455 KA

EPA300.0 11/29/00 0900 KA

EPA 200.7 11/22100 1447 WL

EPA 200.7 11/22100 1447 WL

EPA 200.7 11/22100 1447 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA- "Methods for the ermination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111- May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 164: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Fox (505) 325-4162 Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

BANKS 1

0300W04999

Water

Cool/Intact

General Parameters Solids· Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

274

3

72

<0.05

3.48

0.44

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

lnter .. Mountain laboratories, Inc.

2

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/10/00

Date Reported: 11/29/00

Date Sampled: 11/09/00

Time Sampled: 1355

EPA 160.2 11/13/00 1455 FP

EPA 160.2 11/10/00 1455 KA

EPA 300.0 11/29/00 0900 KA

EPA 200.7 11/22100 1450 WL

EPA 200.7 11/22100 1450 WL

EPA200.7 11/22100 1450 WL

Reference: EPA· "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA· "Me hod r th ermination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111 ·May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 165: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiO: Matrix:

Condition:

Fax (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton .VA

BOGGS 1

0300W05000

Water

Cool/Intact

General Parameters

Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

1,740

19

991

<0.05

17.7

1.10

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

lnter.Mountain laboratories, Inc.

2

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/10/00

Date Reported: 11/29/00

Date Sampled: 11/06/00

Time Sampled: 0930

EPA 160.2 11/13/00 1455 FP

EPA 160.2 11/10/00 1455 KA

EPA 300.0 11/29/00 0900 KA

EPA 200.7 11/22/00 1459 WL

EPA 200.7 11/22/00 1459 WL

EPA 200.7 11/22/00 1459 WL

Reference: I Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. th D termination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 166: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

.i.ml. lnter.Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326·4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 Quality Control Report

Duplicate Analysis 2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Client:

Project:

Sample ID: LabiD:

Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

BANKS 1

0300W04999

Matrix: Water

Condition: Cool/Intact

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Aluminum Iron

Manganese

3 72

<0.05

3.48

0.44

Report Date:

Receipt Date:

Sample Date:

Time Sampled:

10 7** 2 mg/L

72 0 5 mg/L

<0.05 NC* 0.05 mg/L

3.34 4 0.02 mg/L

0.42 5 0.01 mg/L

*NC- Non-Calculable RPD due to vatue(s) less than DL ••- Difference used for results< 5 X Detection Limit

Reference: EPA· "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA- M s J e Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement 1- 600/R-94-111- May, 1994.

11/29/00

11/10/00

11/09/00

1355

Page 167: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml I nler- Mou n\ai n

Labora!ori ss, J n c.

Client/Project Name ,

~-:: ~· •.~·

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

-c-.-c ,...- ·_._ I I, ·;. \"/":> ·, f\ f

1 r-c. '" ' ; ,, \ i "\ \ ( ____ I) Vv\ \..AlE , \ .. :r'rvc\"1

Project Location \( ....... \~bv\D/. '~o.- I ANALYSES/ PARAMETERS

-" /

' ........ ,. ..... '..::!~ ... ·w~""J Chain of Custody Tape No. ;/' "--! I I I -1- r A-- \. ' A II) " Remarks . ~ v --. rJ r-. f! 1- w.." ' . ~ ~ 0'-- r------------1

5ample No./ Identification

\) \.\ t { \ tl...a,\\· \If! \

hc:e\ ILs \ 't:oa,o~ I

~'::I'.,.)

~ ~

Date Time Lab Number

Ukr!no HIS" lt</Df'97~ Jdqloo \3))' lwor~f~ 1\1\r\oo D<?3o I w os-oo o

"'- ~", \ ~- \ 't~ \

Matrix (,\/~ V\-{1, ';€ /

Wo~te r \Ali"fl

-iii r 4 o- ,.. o a v--~ zo .eF-"' d- ;( X ~ x )( d- X )(

/ 7:7

"' ~"-, "' ~- I "'{.., ,, '4'

-~

'"' Time R "ved by: (Signature)

fr; t5 ') [i ·Date Time

Relinquished by: (Signature) ' Date Time R~ved laboratory_;~I§Jriature)

- 0 t~/ /- tf ~-.u:.___

0 555 Absaraka Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Telephone (307) 674-7506

t - ,..; r'/l/1/'\ ' fl/M #. ~ '---""''-

_ Inter -Mountain Labora}Prre80!. nc_.__ 0 0/44,- \ t'i ) 0 1633 Terra Avenue 1701 Phillips Circle . '--~est Main Street 111 83 State Hwy. 30 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Gillette, Wyoming 82718 Farmington, NM 87401 College Station, TX 77845 Telephone (307) 672-8945 Telephone (307) 682-8945 Telephone (505) 326-4737 Telephone (979) 776-8945

' '1\ A "{ jJ_ _l_

~--'

" Date

Date

"'\ ' Time

Time

I .9'/ I Time

d?o/4' .\ ,.:~ c

70564

Page 168: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lrnl Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

December 7, 2000

Todd Stein Daniel B. Stevens Consulting 6020 Academy Rd. NE, Suite 100 Albuquerque, NM 87109

Mr. Stein:

Enclosed please find the reports for the samples received by our laboratory for analysis on November 21, 2000.

If you have any questions about the results of these analyses, please don't hesitate to call me at your convenience. ·

Thank you for choosing IML for your analytical needs!

Enclosure

xc: File

Page 169: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lm1 lnter .. Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fox (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

DANIEL B. STEVENS

Case Narrative

On November 21, 2000, four water samples were submitted to Inter-Mountain Laboratories- Farmington for analysis. The parameters performed on the samples are indicated on the accompanying Chain of Custody.

It is the policy of this laboratory to employ, whenever possible, preparatory and analytical methods which have been approved by regulatory agencies. The methods used in the analysis of the samples reported herein are found in: EPA: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020 - March 1983, "Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples", Supplement 1-600/R-94-111 -May, 1994.

If there are any questions regarding the information presented in this report package, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.

Sim William Lipps Assistant Lab M

Page 170: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml. Phone (505) 326-4737

Client:

Project:

Sample 10: LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fax (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

Boggs 2

0300W05150

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

1,710

9

955

<0.05

O.Q3 0.88

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. 2506Wesl Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/21/00

Date Reported: 12/05/00

Date Sampled: 11/18/00

Time Sampled: 1515

mg/L 10 EPA 160.1 11/22/00 0930 FP

mg/L 2 EPA 160.2 11/17/00 0900 KA

mg/L 5 EPA300.0 12/01/00 1339 KA

mg/L 0.05 EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1344 WL

mg/L 0.02 EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1344 WL

mg/L 0.01 EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1344 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA- "Methods for the termination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111 -May, 1994.

Reviewed By: ~:/

Page 171: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Phone (505)326-4737

Chent:

Project:

Sample ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fax (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

Ratliff 2 0300W05151

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

430

14

108

0.07

5.71

0.42

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

lnter .. Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/21/00

Date Reported: 12/05/00

Date Sampled: 11/18/00

Time Sampled: 1425

EPA 160.1 11/22100 0930 FP

EPA 160.2 11/17/00 0900 KA

EPA300.0 12101/00 1406 KA

EPA 200.7 12105/00 1347 WL

EPA200.7 12/05/00 134 7 WL

EPA 200.7 12105/00 134 7 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

EPA - "Me/ fl;; tt-.e7natioo of Meta~ '" Emrim•me•lal S•mples" - Sup~oment I - 600/R-94-111 - M•y, 1994.

Reviewed By: ~16

Page 172: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Phone (505l326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182

Cl ent: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

labiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Banks 2

0300W05152

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids· Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

260

21

72

<0.05

24.8

0.35

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/21/00

Date Reported: 12/05/00

Date Sampled: 11/18/00

Time Sampled: 1430

EPA 160.1 11/22100 0930 FP

EPA 160.2 11/17/00 0900 KA

EPA300.0 12101/00 1416 KA

EPA200.7 12105/00 1350 WL

EPA 200.7 12105/00 1350 WL

EPA 200.7 12105/00 1350 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

EPA- "Me!f;_" ~v~~n of Metals in Environmental Samples•- Supplement I - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

-ewed By. b1X ~~

Page 173: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lmJ. Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182

Client: Daniel B. Stephens 2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Sumner 1

0300W05153

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemi

EPA- "Meth.'/7 rl!t Reviewed By: IJW

250 mg/L 10

<2 mg/L 2

7 mg/L 5

<0.05 mg/L 0.05

20.8 mg/L 0.02

0.89 mg/L 0.01

Date Received: 11/21/00

Date Reported: 12/05/00

Date Sampled: 11/18/00

Time Sampled: 1605

EPA 160.1 11/22100 0930 FP

EPA 160.2 11/17/00 0900 KA

EPA 300.0 12/01/00 1425 KA

EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1353 WL

EPA 200.7 12105/00 1353 WL

EPA 200.7 12105/00 1353 WL

Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. ter ination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111 -May, 1994.

Page 174: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

.iJnl !nler- Mounlain

Laboralories, Inc. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

Clle~~~oject;ame Project Location I I ANALY~ES/PARAMETERS \) \:;'~·:t ' ) (1 ~ }v\ ·'\~('\ ~ "' \

\ \ ·, ~ L i e \ --. u o '-l I\ )Aj i. ,, / '· . . ' . ~ \ /U·

Samp~r: (Signature) ~ I

Chain of Custody Tape No. I~ I ~L ~~ I I .. Remarks ~~·' J '-:,V v' •v-. \ , r·, . '<·. -~ - • x' , r f\_) 1\

-~..... ;;;. ~<· ..... \;'" ~ ... ;_,_ ID C:.:::.9 ....:::: c j-'t<

-iii r, ~~ - .· o-SampleNoJ .c _;. ::> <.f' .....f

00 - Q._~-.....,_ --Identification Date Time Lab Number Matrix zo '-' . Fl~ ·~ v -~ f /

\' -.., \\\ q ( / \ <_:. l <:;_ \~'0.· () -~ .. .>: )..·' '

. ·rC\c", c... . .; •l .. ( ~ I ' J "' -~..J\..) I r- ""1 '\\ \~\cv \ l\'jS' \\~()

---.. X y ,.

·~ ' r.J -· r \'1: 't J .,. " j

\).,""\~.~ \ ,, ,'t \\ \\'.7 "'(' '' .... . .. \ !· 1.£ ~\ t' / \\ .~.

' ~, \ ) d ·x. "' c~l\Nf p, \ \ \\\'l\CC \~OS \\ ,--:·

,_, -'7, L/ 2 v (" \

'

·'

X

~ /

•,

~~~q."!~~ b~~gnature) Date Time -R~ived by: (Signature) Date

\\\\\\CJC )\)() \~'~\_W \z:~-.~\ _o '

Relinquished by: {sign.Qture) Date Time Received by: (Signature)· Date '.,

~ ... -

'"

Relinquished by: (Signature) Date Time Received by laboratory: (Signature) ""

Date '• "

~

f

Inter-Mountain Laboratories~. Inc. .,

,<

" ,.' ~:

Time

Time

Time

" - •.

0 0 0 ltJ 0 70865 555 Absaraka 1633 Terra Avenue 1701 Phillips Circle #506 West Main Street 11183 State Hwy. 30 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Gillette, Wyoming 82718 Farmington, NM 87401 College Station, TX 77845 Telephone (307) 674-7506 Telephone (307) 672-8945 Telephone (307) 682-8945 Telephone (505) 326·4737 Telephone (979) 776-8945

-- -·--

Page 175: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 67401

Date: 12/12/00

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Lab ID: 0300W05218

Project: Norton, VA

Dear Client:

The samples were received for analysis at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (IML), Farmington, New Mexico. Enclosed are the results of these analyses.

Comment:

Analytical results were obtained by approved methods. Sample analyses were obtained within the method specific holding times. Practical Quantitation Limits (POL's) are based on method requirements, and any dilutions necessary to maintain proper method response without matrix interference.

If you have any questions, please call me at (505) 326-4737.

IML-Farmington, NM

Page 176: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fox (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

Hurley #1

0300W05218

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

700

22 36

<0.05

12.9

1.51

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0,01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/22/00

Date Reported: 12/12/00

Date Sampled: 11/20/00

Time Sampled: 1418

EPA 160.1 11/29/00 1200 KA

EPA 160.2 11/28/00 1200 KA

EPA300.0 12/05/00 1002 KA

EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1416 WL

EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1416 WL

EPA 200.7 12/05/00 1416 WL

Reference: EPA- '~'Math ds for C mical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

EPA - • et '/}-j" e -.nl""tioo of Metal• lo E""'ronmontal Samptos• - S"pple~otl - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Reviewed By: f!JL

Page 177: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

..iml I ..reo-Mlluntai~

LabotaiOOos. ~- CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD llentJPro,ject Name ! Project LocatJon 7- / _\)~':>'\-A a Sl"' lJ ,,\ \ ~LL I ! l.r '1.' ~"' I ANALYSES I PARA~ETERS I

~:(Sig. nature), \ Chain of C~~odyTape No. / • I ~ / ~+/ I ~ Remar1ts

\\;.\" ~ ~ .U.f\ I i! I ~ ~ -j

II! ! 'OS~ ~J ~ SampleN~~ I . I o3 ~ ~ =! , 1 ldenllflcat1on Date J __ Tlme I Lab Number f Matr1x : zo f-.- ~ ~ ! : _ 1

~ur\t"i \ \\ 'J~I\4 'h f 1 \\ .. o : d. X' I _y: i , --=1 ;,::)

4 I I ! I " I ' i l . - . i i l ----I - I I L! - - I . I i 1 l

1 i ! I I L I __ L I i ~I I !

r I i · i I I l I I -r- j i :

11 ·

1

1 1 1

' I i ' , ' i .i ! I - i I ~ -r-~ I . ' i i I I [ , . ' - I

L-1 ± . t--li: i ~ ! I I ! I I I ~ i

i t I :· -T_~--~ ~ l I I-~-~~~~ ~t----1 1 • ; i I r I I

~ulahed by: ~rej . ---1-D;.Je -~ llme

~P~.- ~--atlnquished by:: (Signa1ure) Date li:me 1

l i --- -1----~

-•lohedbr-(Sign..,re) ~~le <j)~

Inter-Mountain Laboratories, In . -r I o o o ;('" o 70731 I 555 Absaraka 1633 Terra Avenue 1701 Prullips Circle ~06 West Mafn Street 11183 State Hwy_ 30

1 1

Sheridan, WyomJng 82801 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 GiJ!ette, Wyoming 82718 Farmington, NM 87401 College Station, TX 77845 i j' Telephone (307) 674-7506 Telephone (307) 672-8945 Te~one (307) 6S2-8945 Telephone (505) 325-4737 Teleptlone {97"9) 776-894:__j __ _ -~--

Page 178: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fox (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date: 12/15/00

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Lab 10: 0300W05257 - 60

Project: Norton, VA

Dear Client:

The samples were received for analysis at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (IML), Farmington, New Mexico. Enclosed are the results of these analyses.

Comment:

Analytical results were obtained by approved methods. Sample analyses were obtained within the method specific holding times. Practical Quantitation Limits (POL's) are based on method requirements, and any dilutions necessary to maintain proper method response without matrix interference.

If you have any questions, please call me at (505) 326-4737.

/)@ William Lipps IML-Farmington, NM

Page 179: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Sumner-2

0300W05257

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

Reference:

Reviewed By:

250 mg/L 10

103 mg/L 2

5 mg/L 5

0.06 mgtL 0.05

67.0 mg/L 0.02

3.86 mg/L 0.01

Date Received: 11/28/00

Date Reported: 12/15/00

Date Sampled: 11/25/00

Time Sampled: 1800

EPA 160.1 11/29/00 1200 KA

EPA 160.2 12/01/00 1130 KA

EPA300.0 12106/00 1018 WL

EPA 200.7 12106/00 1356 WL

EPA200.7 12106/00 1356 Wl

EPA200.7 12106/00 1356 WL

I Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. e rmlnation of Metals In Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111 -May, 1994.

Page 180: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lm1 Phone (505) 326-4737

Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fox (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

Hurley-2

0300W05258

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

650

26

37

<0.05

14.7

1.46

lnter .. Mountain Laboratories, Inc. 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/28/00

Date Reported: 12/15/00

Date Sampled: 11/25/00

Time Sampled: 1900

mg/L 10 EPA 160.1 11/29/00 1200 KA

mg/L 2 EPA 160.2 12/01/00 1130 KA

mg/L 5 EPA 300.0 12/06/00 1018 WL

mg/L 0.05 EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1359 WL

mg/L 0.02 EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1359 WL

mg/L 0.01 EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1359 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chern· I Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

EPA- "Meyodlhte

Reviewed By: WW I nation of Metals in Environmental Samples" - Supplement I - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Page 181: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Dean 1·1

0300W05259

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids· Total Dissolved

Solids· Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

400

75

145

O.Q7

28.4

1.00

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 11/28/00

Date Reported: 12/15/00

Date Sampled: 11/26/00

Time Sampled: 1615

EPA 160.1 11/29/00 1200 KA

EPA 160.2 12101/00 1130 KA

EPA300.0 12/06/00 1018 WL

EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1402 WL

EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1402 WL

EPA 200.7 12106/00 1402 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemi Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. te inatlon of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 182: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Slreel, Farmington, NM 87401

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

labiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Dean 2-1

0300W05260

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

Reference:

Reviewed By:

320 mg/L 10

7 mgfl 2

109 mg/L 5

<0.05 mg/L 0.05

4.62 mg/L 0.02

0.39 mg/L 0.01

Date Received: 11/28/00

Date Reported: 12/15/00

Date Sampled: 11/26/00

Time Sampled: 1620

EPA 160.1 11f29f00 1200 KA

EPA 160.2 12f01f00 1130 KA

EPA 300.0 12{06/00 1018 WL

EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1410 WL

EPA 200.7 12/06/00 1410 WL

EPA 200.7 12f06/00 1410 WL

ical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. termination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement 1 - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Page 183: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

To:

:S J,e r- }.\nu crla\o LabnrJcHifS, L,c.. Date \ ~ -;)(.\0 0 Project No.

Client DmLC1~)1_L.~-~-Ii. l-~ Relinquishedby \0U s;::::u \\~~~~

Sent by: ~ Fed Ex D DHL 0 Other

Purpose of Shipment \Py'!-A t \..g ~ ""c.. \ Yyf>. : b.

Possible Contaminants --------------------------------

Item Sample No. Analysis to be Done Sample Comments No. Container

ISu..-Mh~- J \ L ~ ~ th.j I T'D~ J \~ ~

--:J .J t .L-l \ \\I ~5"JOO \ AOJ, 1\':}~o-t -,,..i _\ A\.'='~" 6. M11 1 ?J6o

\\tu.\Uj ,

~ c ~1\ ,u ';)$"160 A ·) \\ ~ \ L'\OD \ q

\\o-.: )-\ \ \ ') \ rn~\ \ \\/";)VIf~o .A lC.Is \ Ia

\\o_A.N\ ~- \ u d ~~rn-\ \ "/"~c. (0 0

l'-"JO \ A"~\ ~- '@- .AQ __ cb

Received the above articles in good condition

Except as noted

08S&A F'orrn No. 095 5192

Page 184: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date: 12/20/00

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Lab ID: 0300W05356 - 59

Project: Norton, VA

Dear Client:

The samples were received for analysis at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (IML), Farmington, New Mexico. Enclosed are the results of these analyses.

Comment:

Analytical results were obtained by approved methods. Sample analyses were obtained within the method specific holding times. Practical Quantitation Limits (POL's) are based on method requirements, and any dilutions necessary to maintain proper method response without matrix interference.

If you have any questions, please call me at (505) 326-4737.

William Lipps IML-Farmington, NM

Page 185: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

.iml Phone (505) 326-4737

Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

Lab 10: Matrix:

Condition:

Fox (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton, VA

Dean 1-2

0300W05356

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids -Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

380

<2

144

<0.05

5.42

0.85

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 12/05/00

Date Reported: 12/20/00

Date Sampled: 12/04/00

Time Sampled: 1305

EPA 160.1 12/08/00 1600 FP

EPA 160.2 12/06/00 1100 KA

EPA 300.0 12/06/00 1018 KA

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1437 WL

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1437 WL

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1437 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

EPA -"'rf1t e eteonloatioo of Metal• lo Eo•momeofal Samp~,· - S"pp~meoll - 600/R-94-111 - ~ay, 1994.

Rev1ewed By: ~

Page 186: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

lml Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4162

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

Dean 2-2

0300W05357

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

280 mg/L

<2 mg/L

109 mg/L

<0.05 mg/L

1.84 mg/L

0.24 mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 67401

Date Received: 12/05/00

Date Reported: 12/20/00

Date Sampled: 12/04/00

Time Sampled: 1324

EPA 160.1 12/08/00 1600 FP EPA 160.2 12/06/00 1100 KA

EPA 300.0 12/06/00 1018 KA

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1445 WL

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1445 WL

EPA200.7 12/19/00 1445 WL

Page 187: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample ID:

Lab ID:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton, VA

Abbott 1-1

0300W05358

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

Reference:

180 mg/L

<2 mg/L

7 mg/L

<0.05 mg/L

0.89 mg/L

0.10 mg/L

lnter.Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 12/05/00

Date Reported: 12/20/00

Date Sampled: 12/04/00

Time Sampled: 1240

EPA 160.1 12/08/00 1600 FP

EPA 160.2 12/06/00 1100 KA

EPA 300.0 12/06/00 1018 KA

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1448 WL

EPA 200.7 12/19/00 1448 WL

EPA200.7 12/19/00 1448 WL

alysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. rmi tion of Metals In Environmental Samples" - Supplement I - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 188: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Client:

Project:

Sample ID:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Fax (505) 325-4182 Daniel B. Stephens

Norton,VA

Abbott 2-1

0300W05359

Water

Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

160

58

15

<0.05

16.4

0.55

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

lnter.Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87 401

Date Received: 12/05/00

Date Reported: 12/20/00

Date Sampled: 12/04/00

Time Sampled: 1245

EPA 160.1 12/08/00 1600 FP

EPA 160.2 12/06/00 1100 KA

EPA 300.0 12/06/00 1018 KA

EPA200.7 12/19/00 1451 WL

EPA200.7 12119/00 1451 WL EPA200.7 12/19/00 1451 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods or Che · I Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA- "Me ho th ete ination of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement I- 600/R-94-111 -May, 1994.

Reviewed By:

Page 189: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

_ ~ DANIEL B. STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Chain Of Custody ===~F=~~~~==~~~~~~~~============================~~==

To: •

'I n~e c -A Ql II c+g I A l'{kCJ r1cl'es, )ac Date D\4\ D cJ Project No. q d. 9 0

Client fk ~~ L~l\ ')U'j Relinquished by~\; q/oo \44-5 f~ { -- 1- ~f!J·)- - .YP f' - u .~:2 -:) cr Sent by: ~ Fed Ex D DHL 0 Other

Purpose of Shipment 4.~1r ~~ ur-. ~.1\ Pos~bleContam~ants ~~~~o)~\~~~· ~~p~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Item Sample No. Analysis to be Done Sample No. Container Comments

1\\~~ -\-- j I\ L- ~0.'1 \ \\)'S I I~ "':::! 'l~'"JMJ-,.b~· (\~ 1:~> 4-M~~

\-\ L 1 1-\-:lM,J IO.a lJJ~lno l~6.e; WD 5.~

~~loa/\ J -j_ \I \I n ;} ~~~)~I\ 13 :>tt 5:-p ., U+ \--\ ~I lb/1v ~ I I I 1

Ill \7 /CY-3 \~40 V\

*h ~+ J-- \ l t 1 I ~\ )~, 13loo '?l.f 5 ~); I

- "'

Date Received ~~~!vo by ~Wh-{Hy~~r ~t l_ Company Reprasentatrve

Received the above articles in good condition

Except as noted

DBS&A Form No. 095 5192

Page 190: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date: 1/25/01

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Lab ID: 0301W00307- 08

Project: Norton, VA

Dear Client:

The samples were received for analysis at Inter-Mountain Laboratories (IML), Farmington, New Mexico. Enclosed are the results of these analyses.

Comment:

Analytical results were obtained by approved methods. Sample analyses were obtained within the method specific holding times. Practical Quantitation Limits (POL's) are based on method requirements, and any dilutions necessary to maintain proper method response without matrix interference.

If you have any questions, please call me at (505} 326-4737.

William Lipps IML-Farmington,

Page 191: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample 10:

LabiD:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

ABBOTT 1-2

0301W00307

Water

Cool/Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

140 mg/L

6 mg/L

<5 mg/L

<0.05 mg/L

0.34 mg/L

0.03 mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 01/11/01

Date Reported: 01/25/01

Date Sampled: 12/07/00

Time Sampled: 1813

EPA 160.1 01/15/01 1000 FP

EPA 160.2 01/12/01 0820 KA

EPA300.0 01/11/01 0941 KA

EPA 200.7 01/25/01 1204 WL

EPA200.7 01/25/01 1204 WL

EPA 200.7 01/25/01 1204 WL

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Che :~nalysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983. EPA- "Mleo fc th j inatlon of Metals in Environmental Samples"- Supplement 1- 600/R-94-111- May, 1994.

Reviewed By: I J

Page 192: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182 Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project:

Sample 10:

Lab 10:

Matrix:

Condition:

Norton,VA

ABBOTT 2-2

0301W00308

Water

Cool/Intact

General Parameters Solids- Total Dissolved

Solids -Total Suspended

Sulfate

Total Metals Aluminum

Iron

Manganese

130 mg/L

35 mg/L

12 mg/L

<0.05 mg/L

5.16 mg/L

0.07 mg/L

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc.

10

2

5

0.05

0.02

0.01

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Date Received: 01/11/01

Date Reported: 01/25/01

Date Sampled: 12/07/00

Time Sampled: 1620

EPA 160.1 01/15/01 1000 FP

EPA 160.2 01/12/01 0820 KA

EPA 300.0 01/11/01 0941 KA

EPA200.7 01/25/01 1207 WL

EPA 200.7 01/25/01 1207 WL

EPA 200.7 01/25/01 1207 WL

Page 193: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Phone (505) 326-4737 Fax (505) 325-4182

Client: Daniel B. Stephens

Project: Norton,VA Sample 10: ABBOTT 2-2

LabiD: 0301VV00308

VVater

Cool/Intact

Solids- Total Suspended

Sulfate

Aluminum

Iron Manganese

35

12

<0.05

5.16

0.07

Inter-Mountain laboratories, Inc. Quality Control Report

Duplicate Analysis

46

12

<0.05

5.57

0.07

27 o•·

NC*

8

0

2506 West Main Street, Farmington, NM 87401

Report Date: 02/05/01

Receipt Date: 01/11/01

Sample Date: 12/07/00

Time Sampled: 1620

2 mg/L

5 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

0.02 mg/L

0.01 mg/L

*NC- Non-Calculable RPD due to value(s) less than DL ••- Difference used for results< 5 X Detection Limit

Reference: EPA- "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (MCAWW)"- EPA/600/4-79-020- March, 1983.

"""""""' By' EPA -@ In e Delennloatioo of Metal• to E"'ironmeolai Sa""l"'" - S"pp~meot 1 - 600/R-94-111 - May, 1994.

Page 194: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix C

Graphs of Quarterly Monitoring Data

Page 195: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix C1

Fall-Winter 2000

Page 196: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

'2 .E 14 -"iij s ~ 12

..2 u..

Shot Blast

l 10

8

6

4

2

0 11/05/00 11/06/00 11/07/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\boggsflow _ novOO.xls Tab Flow

Shot Blast

l

Well Yield Site VA-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast

11/08/00 11/09/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

l

11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00

Page 197: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

'C' Q)

30

25

g 20 "C (I) 1: e -Q)

> 0

.IJ ca 15 G)

~ G)

~ ...I ... ! 10 3:

5

0 11/05/00

Shot Blast

11/06/00 11/07/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Boggs\21 x\Boggs21 X_ novOO.xls Tab Stage

Water Level Site VA-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/08/00 11/09/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00

Page 198: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600 i Shot Blast

1400

e ~ 1200 o I .: I

.§: 1000 1

M I 8oo 1

I 600 I

400

200

0

11/05/00 11/06/00 11/07/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\Boggs\21 x\Boggs21 X_ novOO.xts Tab ec

Well EC Site VA-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

VAA A vv-~v~vv., v <vv'~' v~ vv~- - -

i i Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/08/00 11/09/00

i Shot Blast

A --AA~~-~~ •• 0 OA-~-----~

i i Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00

Page 199: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

25

20

0 0 -e :l -e 15 CD Q. E Q)

1-

10

5

0 11/05/00

Shot Blast

11/06/00 11/07/00

S:·\projects\9290\sheets\Boggs\21 x\Boggs21 X_ novOO .xis Tab Temp

Water Temperature Site VA-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/08/00 11/09/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00

Page 200: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10 •• v v~ ~--

9.5

9

Shot Blast 8.5

l 8

-7.5 II)

:'!::::: r::: :::1

" 7 ...

R:l

" r::: .! 6.5 II) -:I: Q. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5 i -----·--~-----~~ ---·

11/05/00 11/06/00 11/07/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\Boggs\21 x\Boggs21 X_ novOO.xls Tab ph

Water pH Site VA-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l

11/08/00 11/09/00

AAV -A-"~----- V-~~V~-VV~V•<<A •A-~--- A~-~

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l l

11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00

Page 201: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well Yield Site KY -1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

26.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

24

22

20

18

16

e 14 c. m -~ 12 Ll.

10 Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

8

6

4

2

OL-----~~~ ............ . 11/12/00 11/13/00 11/14/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11/18/00

S :\projects\9290\shee!s\banks\ 1 01 0\banksftow .xis

Page 202: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-... Gl u :I '0 !II c I'll ,_ -Gl > 0 .0 I'll -Gl Gl .... -'i) > ~ ... Gl -I'll ~

Water Level Site KY -1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

30 .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,

25

i i Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

20

15

10

5

0 ~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~------~ 11/13/00 11/13/00 11/14/00 11/14/00 11/15/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11117/00 11/18/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\banks\21 x\BANKS21 X_novOO.xls Tab Stage

Page 203: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

-E 14 0..

~ 3:

12 .!2 1L

10

8

6

4

2

0

11/09/00 11/10/00 11/11/00

S:\projecls\9290\sheets\ralliff\ 101 0\rallifffiow .xis

11/12/00

Well Yield Site KY-1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/13/00 11/14/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11/18/00

Page 204: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-... 4l 0 :::s "C U) 1: Ill ... -Cll > 0 .c I'll -4l ~ -a; > 4l

..J ... 4l -Ill 3:

30

25

20

15

10

5

Water Level Site KY -1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast

~

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

~ ~ ~ ~ !

0 ~----------------~--------~--------------------------~------~--------~------~ 11/9/00 11/10/00 11/11/00 11/12/00 11/13/00 11/14/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11/18/00

Page 205: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

'2 E 14 -iii .9 ~ 12

..2 Shot Blasts u.

10 ~ ~ 8

6

4

2

0 11/19/00 11/20/00 11/21/00

S:\projecls\9290\sheels\sum nerl 1 0 1 0\SumnerFiow.xls

Well Yield Site KY-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

~ ~

11/22/00 11/23/00 11124/00 11/25/00 11/26/00

Page 206: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

'C Q) (.) ;:,

"C Ill c: 1':1 ... -a> > 0 .c 1':1 -Q) a> ~

Q) > a> .J ... a> -1':1 3:

30

25 :

20

15

10

5

0 11/19/00

Shot Blasts

l l

11/20/00 11/21/00

Water Level Site KY-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

J l

11/22/00 11/23/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\Sumner\21 xiS UMNER21 X_novOO.xls Tab Stage

11/24/00 11/25/00 11/26/00 11/27/00

Page 207: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-() L. Ql ... :I ... Ill ... Ql c. E Ql 1-

Water Temperature Site KY-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

30 r---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,

25

20

15

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

10 ~ ~ ~ ~

5

0 ~--------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------~ 11/19/00 11/20/00 11/21/00 11/22/00 11/23/00 11/24/00 11/25/00 11/26/00 11/27/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\Sumner\21 x\SUMNE R21 X_ novOO.xls Tab temp

Page 208: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

-7.5 U) -·c

::> 7 "'E n:l "C c: .! 65 ~ :I: Q. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

Shot Blasts

Water pH Site KY-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

3.5 ~--------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------~ 11/19/00 11/20/00 11/21/00 11/22/00 11/23/00 11/24/00 11/25/00 11/26/00 11/27/00

S:\projecls\9290\sheets\Sumner\21 x\SU MNER21 X_novOO.xls Tab PH

Page 209: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

c ·e 14 -ra E! ~ 12 £! u..

10

8

6

4

2

0 ~·~I!WIIIIilllllllll

11/14/00 11/16/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Hurley\ 1 01 0\HurleyFiow .xis

11/18/00

Well Yield Site KY-2 Well-3 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

'

11/20/00 11/22/00 11/24/00 11/26/00

Page 210: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30

25 ;

-.... CP 20 ()

:J "C !IJ t: 11:1 .... -Cl)

> 0 .c 11:1 15 -Cl)

~ Cl) > Cl)

...J .... CP 10 -11:1

~

5

;

Water Level Site KY -2 Well-3 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts

ll Shot Blasts

0 L------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 11/14/00 11/16/00 11/18/00 11/20/00 11/22/00 11/24/00 11/26/00

S:\Projects\9290\sheets\hurley\21 x\Hurley\H URLEY21 X_ novOO.xls Tab Stage

Page 211: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24 Shot Blast

22

20 l 18

16

c .E 14 iii ~ ~ 12 0 u:

10

8

6

4

2

0

11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 1 I 1 0 1 0\0ean 1 flow.xls

Well Yield Site WV-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l

r~

11/29/00 11/30/00

Shot Blast

l ~

I

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 212: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

25

-... Ql

20 0 j 't) Ill c I'll ... Shot Blast ... Ql >

l 0 .D I'll 15 G) Ql :!:. Qi

r 1 ln > Ql .J ... Ql ... 10 I'll ~

5

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l 11ft r 1

Shot Blast

l f'l tt r r f !

0 L----------------------------~----------------------------~------------~------------~ 11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00 11/29/00 11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 1\21 x\Oean 121 X _novOO.xls Tab Stage

Page 213: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E -M 1200 0 .c E 3: 1000 0 w Shot Blast

BOO

600

400

200

0

11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 1\21 x\Dean121 X _novOO.xls Tab EC

Well EC Site WV-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/29/00

Shot Blast

11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00

Page 214: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

u 'L e :::1

30

25 i

20

e 15 (I) Q. E (I) 1-

10

5

0

11/26/00

Shot Blast

11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 1\21 x\Dean121X_nov00.xls Tab temp

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/29/00

Shot Blast

11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00

Page 215: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

Iii" 7.5 ~ c: :I "E 7 Ill

"t:l c: s 6.5

en -J: Q. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5

11/26/00

Shot Blast

11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 1\21 x\Dean 121 X_novOO.xls Tab PH

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

11/29/00

Shot Blast

11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00

Page 216: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

-~ ..§ 14 ia ~ ~ 12 0 u:: Shot Blast

10

8 l 6 .•. ~:

t~ ·~. j ~j ~j

4

2

0 --

11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

S:lprojects\9290\sheets\Dean2\ 1 01 O\Dean2flow .xis

Well Yield Site WV-1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l l· .~ ·~

i ~l •t ~~ ••

11/29/00 11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 217: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30 !

25

-... Q) u 20 ::I 'tl II) c (Q ... -Q)

> Shot Blast 0 .D IU 15 -Q)

l ~ Qj > Gl

...J ... Gl 10 -l'il '-3: w

5

o:. __ _ 11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

Shot Blast

l .... •

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast

l ~

2 '

Shot Blast

l

11/29/00 11/30/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 2\21x\DEAN221X_novOO.xls Tab Stage

... a .,

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 218: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200 I

2000

1800

1600

1400

e ~ 1200 0

..c: E 2: 1000 u w

BOO

600

400

200

0 11/26/00

Shot Blast

l

11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 2\21 x\DEAN221 X_ novOO .xis Tab EC

Well EC Site WV-1 Site-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l Shot Blast

l

11/29/00 11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 219: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30

25

20 Shot Blast

- l (.) ~

Cll ... ::::::1 - 15 ~ Cll c. E Cll ~

10

5

oL __ _

11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 2121x\DEAN221X_nov00.xls Tab temp

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l

11/29/00 11/30/00

Shot Blast

l

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 220: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

-7.5 (II

Shot Blast :!::::: c :I "C 7

l ... Ill

"C c Ill 6.5 ... ~ :I: a. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5

11/26/00 11/27/00 11/28/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Dean 2\21x\DEAN221X_novOO.xls Tab PH

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast Shot Blast

l l Shot Blast

l

11/29/00 11/30/00 12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

Page 221: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16 -c ·e 14 -n; ~ ~ 12

..2 u..

10

8

6

4

2

0

12/02/00 12/03/00 12/04/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\abbot1 \1 0 1 O\Abbott1 ffow.xls

Well Yield Site WV-2 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts

l l

12/05/00

Shot Blasts

l l

12/06/00

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

l l

12/07/00 12/08/00

Note: 0.001 = 0

Page 222: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30

25

'C' Cll (.J 20 :I

"C Ill c 11:1 ... ... Cll > 0

J:l 11:1 15 -Cll

~ Gi > Cll

..J ... Cll 10 -; ~

5

Water Level Site WV-2 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

l l l l ij02ll ,., 11

Shot Blasts

l

0 ····---- ·----·--~~-- -~~~~~~~~~~-~·-~-~~~----------------------\

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00 12/04/00 12/05/00 12/06/00 12/07/00 12/08/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\abbot 1 \21 x\Abbott121 X_ decOO .xis Tab Stage

Page 223: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

e ~ 1200 0 .c E

.:!:: 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200

Well EC Site WV-2 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

o~--------------------------------------------------------------,-------------------------

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00 12/04/00 12/05/00 12/06/00 12/07/00 12/08/00

S:lprojecls\9290\sheels\abbot1121x\Abboti121X_dec00.xls Tab EC

Page 224: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

0 ~

Cll ... :I -Ill ... Cll Q. E Cll t-

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\abbot 1 121 x\Abbott121 X_ decOO.xls Tab Temp

Water Temperature Site WV-2 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts

ll

12/04/00 12/05/00

Shot Blasts

l l

12/06/00

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

ll l

12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 225: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10.00

9.50

9.00

8.50

8.00

- 7.50 1/)

:t::: c: ::l "C 7.00 ... l'il

"C c

6.50 l'il -~ :I: a. 6.00

5.50

5.00

4.50

4.00

3.50

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projecls\9290\sheels\abbot 1\21x\Abbott121X_decOO.xls Tab pH

Water pH Site WV-2 Well-1 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blasts

1 1

12/04/00 12/05/00

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

1 1 11 1

12/06/00 12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 226: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16

-c .E 14 -iii

Cl -~ 12 0

u:: 10

8

6

4

2

0 ...

12/03/00 12/04/00

S :\projects\9290\sheets\abbott21 1 0 1 O\abbott2flow.xls

Well Yield Site WV-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

Shot Blast

12/05/00

Shot Blast

12/06/00

Shot Blast

12/07/00 12/08/00

Note: 0.001=0

Page 227: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30

25

-... GJ u 20 :l "C II)

c: I'll ... -(I) > 0 ,g 11:1 15 -GJ

~ G) > GJ .J ... (I) 10 -I'll ~

5

0 : -------~-------

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Abbott 2121 x\Abbott221 X_ decOO .xis Tab Stage

Water Level Site WV-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

' ' ' ' ~~ V<--~~~~~~. 0 0 ~ 0A 0 oAo A- A-A VV< ·-·- ~ o - o oooooo~A~oAAo "~"A----~~--~A-A ~ ~--~~- -'• ~~A-;

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blast

12/04/00 12/05/00 12/06/00 12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 228: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

'E ~ 1200 0 .I: E 2: 1000 (.) w

BOO

600

400

200

12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Abbott 2\21 x\Abbott221 X_ decOO.xls Tab EC

Well EC Site WV-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

12/04/00 12/05/00

Shot Blast

12/06/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast

12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 229: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

u 'L. Ql ... :I -m ... Ql c. E (I) ....

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Abbott 2121x\Abbott221X_decOO.xls Tab temp

Water Temperature Site WV-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

12/04/00 12/05/00

Shot Blast

~ ~

12/06/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast

~ ~

12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 230: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10.00

9.50

9.00

8.50

8.00

Iii 7.50 :::: c:

;::) 7.00 , ...

IV , c:

6.50 ra -~ J: ll. 6.00

5.50

5.00

4.50

4.00 I ' I ' 3.50 L__ __

12/01/00 12/02/00 12/03/00

S:\projects\9290\sheets\Abbott 2121x\Abbott221X_dec00.xls Tab PH

Water pH Site WV-2 Well-2 Fall-Winter 2000

12/04/00 12/05/00

Shot Blast

12/06/00

Shot Blast Shot Blast

12/07/00 12/08/00

Page 231: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix C2

Spring 2001

Page 232: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well Yield Site VA-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

26

24

22

20

18

16 -r:: ~ 14 IV C) -~ 12 .2 u.

10

8

6

4

2

0

3/15/01 3/16/01 3/17/01 3/18/01 3/19/01 3/20/01 3/21/01

Page 233: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0 ~

E ..;!. 1000 u w

BOO

600

400

200

0

3/13/01 3/14/01 3/15/01

Well EC Site VA-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

3/16/01 3/17/01

3/18/01 3/19/01 3/20/01 3/21/01

Page 234: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

25

20

10

5

Water Temperature Site VA-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

0 ~------------------------------------------------~--------------------~------~ 3/13/01 3/14/01 3/15/01 3/16/01 3/17/01 3/18/01 3/19/01 3/20/01 3/21/01

Page 235: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Water pH Site VA-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

10

9.5

9

8.5 ___ _~, a • ....._ • 8

• 7.5

~ -~"

II) :!:: c: 7 - : • :I ....

1:::1 -~ 6.5 ~ c..

6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5

3/13/01 3/14/01 3/15/01 3/16/01 3/17/01 3/18/01 3/19/01 3/20/01 3/21/01

Page 236: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

25

-lo.. Q) 0 ::s 20

"t:: U) r::: Ill lo.. +' Q)

> 0 .0 ca 15 +' Q)

.e -Q)

> Q)

..J lo..

10 s ca ~

5

Water Level Site KY-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

0 ~----------------------------------------------------------------------~----------~ 5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01 6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01 6/7/01

Page 237: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well EC Site KY-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

2200 .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0 .t:. E ~ 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200 I'" .,.. ... 0 ~--------------------------------~----------~--------------------------------~

5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01 6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01 6/7/01

Page 238: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-(.) 0 -

Water Temperature Site KY-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

30 .---------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

25

20

J ••• , ·-· 10

5

0 L---------------------------------------------------------~----------~--------~ 5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01 6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01 6/7/01

Page 239: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

~n 7.5 ;::: r: ::I

"'C 7 .... co

"C r: s 6.5 II) -J: a. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5

5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01

Water pH Site KY-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01 6n1o1

Page 240: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-~ Q) CJ ::::J "C (I) c I'll ~ -Q)

> 0 ..c I'll -Q)

.! -Q)

> Q)

....1 ~ Q) -I'll ~

30

25

20

15

10

5

Water Level Site KY-2 Well-3

Spring 2001

0 ~------------------------------------------~--------------------------~------------~ 5/31/01 6/1101 6/2/01 6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01

Page 241: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well EC Site KY -2 Well-3

Spring 2001

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E -M 1200 0 ~

E ~ 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200

0

5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01 6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01

Page 242: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-u ~

e ::::J -I'll ~

25

20

~ 15 E Cll .... ~

.& I'll

~ 10

5

0 5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01

Water Temperature Site KY-2 Well-3

Spring 2001

6/3/01 6/4/01 6/5/01 6/6/01

Page 243: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

Ui' 7.5 :!: c: ::I

"C 7 ~

IG "C c: s 6.5 Ill -J: Q, 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5

5/31/01 6/1/01 6/2/01

Water pH Site KY-2 Well-3

Spring 2001

6/3/01 6/4/01

-Ji & a u

6/5/01 6/6/01

Page 244: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24 Shot Blasts

22 ~~ ~ 20

18

16 -s:::: ~ 14

1'(1 Cl -~ 12

..2 u..

10

8

6

4

2

0

Shot Blasts

~ ~~

Well Yield Site WV-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ Shot Blasts

~ ~

t ~

~

4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01

Page 245: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

30

25

-,_ (I) (J

::J 20 "C Ul c IV ,_ -(I) > 0 .0 IV 15 -(I) (I) --Q) > (I)

..J ,_ 10 (I) -I'll

~

Shot Blasts

5 ~ ll 0

Shot Blasts

~ ~

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts

~~ r • ~ ;· j t ••

• . ~

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - - -•.;r "f .. .. -.-

.. 1 •• • ' •

4/1/01 4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 417101 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01

Page 246: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well EC Site WV-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

2200 .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------,

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0

..1: E ..;; 1000 u w

800

600

400

200

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

0 ~----------------------~--------------------------------------~----~----~----~ 4/1/01 4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/0 1 4/5/0 1 4/6/0 1 4/7/0 1 4/8/0 1 4/9/01 4/1 0/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01

Page 247: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-u 'L.

Q) ... ::I

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

30 .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

1ij 15 Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

... Q) c. E Q)

1-

10

5

0 L-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~----~ 4/1/01 4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01

Page 248: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-1

Spring 2001

In 7.5 ~ I: j , 7 ~

cu , Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts I:

6.5 cu -Ill -J: 6 a.

"'' 5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5 ~--------------------------------------~----------~~----------~------~----~----~ 4/1/01 4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01

Page 249: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16 -1:

~ 14 nl C) -~ 12 .B u.

10

8

6

Shot Blast Shot Blasts Shot Blasts 4

2

0

ll r r t. / J ( [J d 1A

l

4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01

Well Yield Site WV-1 Well-2

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

t t j ~~ ~ -lL

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

t tH t l • J.._.._l Ll l

II I -4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01

Page 250: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-... Cll CJ

30

25

::I 20 "0 II) 1:

f.! -CD > 0 .0 m 15 -CD

~ a; > CD

...J

a; 10 -~ 5

0

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

1 ll 1 1 H

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-2

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

1 .l .. Lk U. l • 4/2/01 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7101 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01

Page 251: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0

..s:::: E

..;!, 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

.u ~

Well EC Site WV-1 Well-2

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

0 ~----------------------~----------------~------------------~----~----~----~----~ 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01

Page 252: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-2

Spring 2001

30 .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

10

5

0 ~----------------------------------------------~----------------------------~----~ 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 4/7/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01

Page 253: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

(jj' 7.5 ;t:: c: ::::s

"E 7 nl "t:l c:

6.5 nl ..... rn -:I:

6 c.

5.5

5 Shot Blasts

4.5 u 4

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

~ ~ ~~

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-2

Spring 2001

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

3.5 L---------------------------------------------------------------~----~------------------~ 4/3/01 4/4/01 4/5/01 4/6/01 417/01 4/8/01 4/9/01 4/10/01 4/11/01 4/12/01 4/13/01 4/14/01 4/15/01 4/16/01 4/17/01

Page 254: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-... Q) CJ ::J '0 II) 1: C'IJ ... .... Q)

> 0 .Q I'll -Q)

.! -G) > Q)

...J ... Q) .... C'IJ

3:

Water Level Site WV-2 Well-1

Spring 2001

30 ,---------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

15

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blasts

10 ~ ~ ~ ~

5

0 L------------------.------------------------------------~------------------~ 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01

Page 255: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Well EC Site WV-2 Well-1

Spring 2001

2200 ~------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0

.s::. E ~ 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200

Shot Blast Shot Blast Shot Blasts

0 ~------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 256: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-u 0

'! :I

Water Temperature Site WV-2 Well-1

Spring 2001

30 .----------------------------------------------------------------------------,

25

20

Shot Blasts Shot Blasts Shot Blasts

tV 15 ._ Q) c.. E Q)

1-

10

5

0 L---------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 257: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

'iii 7.5 :!:::: !: :::l

"C 7 I.. 11:1

"C !:

6.5 11:1 -II) -:I: Q. 6

Shot Blast

5.5 ~ 5

4.5

4

3.5

4/16/01 4/17/01

Water pH Site WV-2 Well-1

Spring 2001

Shot Blast

~ Shot Blasts

~ ~ ...-. ..-. ............ -

4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 258: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16 -c ..§ 14 iii ~ ~ 12

..S! u.

10

8

6

4

2

0

4/16/01

Shot Blast

4/17/01

Well Yield Site WV-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

Shot Blast

4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 259: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

'i:' G> (,) ~

"tJ Ul r::: 1'1:1 I--G> > 0 .0

1'1:1 -G> .e -(j) > G> ..J I-G> -1'1:1

~

Water Level Site WV-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

30 .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

15

Shot Blast Shot Blast 10

5

0 ~--------~~--------------~----~----------~._------------~~~~~--------------~ 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 260: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Water Temperature Site WV-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

30 .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

Shot Blast Shot Blast

20 ~ ~ ;, •. 1. 2

ns •• a •• =a •

10

5

0 ~------------------------------------------------------------------~--------------~ 4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 261: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Water pH Site WV-2 Well-2

Spring 2001

10 ,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

9.5

9

8.5

8

Iii' 7.5 ~ c: ~

'E 7 1'!1

"C c: J9 6.5 U) -:::r:: c. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

Shot Blast Shot Blast

3.5 ~------------------------------------------------------------------~---------------

4/16/01 4/17/01 4/18/01 4/19/01 4/20/01 4/21/01

Page 262: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix C3

Fall 2001

Page 263: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

26

24

22

20

18

16 -c :5 14 Cll C)

~ -3: 12 .2 LL

10

8

6

4

2 ........ 0

10/25/01 10/26/01

~

10/27/01 10/28/01

Well Yield Site WV-2 Well-1

Fall 2001

10/29/01 10/30/01 10/31/01

t

... ....

11/1/01 11/2/01 11/3/01 11/4/01

Page 264: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

Appendix C4

Winter 2001

Page 265: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-... CD 0 ::l 't) II) c I'll ... -CD > 0 .c I'll -CD ~ -a; > CD -' ... CD -I'll ~

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-1

Winter 2001

30 .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

15

10

5

0 L-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 12/4/01 12/5/01 12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 266: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E ~ 1200 0

..c E

..;!. 1000 0 w

800

600

400

200

0 12/4/01 12/5/01

Well EC Site WV-1 Well-1

Winter 2001

12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 267: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-u ca_..

Q) ... :I

25

20

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-1

Winter 2001

1U 15 ... Q) Q.

E Q)

1-

10

5

0 ~--------------------------------------------------------------------~------------~ 12/4/01 12/5/01 12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 268: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

9.5

9

8.5

8

Ui' 7.5 ~ c :::J

"E: 7 1'1:1 , c !!! 6.5 ~ :I: c. 6

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5 12/4/01 12/5/01

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-1

Winter 2001

12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 269: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-"" Cll 0 ::l

"CC Ill c: 1':1 "" ..... (I)

> 0

..c 1':1

..... Cll Cll --Q) > Cll

...J

"" Cll ..... 1':1

3:

Water Level Site WV-1 Well-2

Winter 2001

30 ,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

15

Shot Blast Shot Blasts

10 ~ ~

5

0 ~--------------------------~------------------------------------------~------------~ 12/4/01 12/5/01 12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 270: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

2200

2000

1800

1600

1400

-E -M 1200 0

..t:: E ..;!. 1000 u w

800

600

400

200

0

12/4/01

Shot Blast

i

12/5/01

Well EC Site WV-1 Well-2

Winter 2001

Shot Blasts

12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 271: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

-u 0 -e ::I

Water Temperature Site WV-1 Well-2

Winter 2001

30 .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

25

20

Shot Blast Shot Blasts

~ ~ ~ 15 .... Q) c. E Q)

1-

10

5

0 ~--------------------------~------------------------------------------------------~ 12/4/01 12/5/01 12/6/01 12/7/01

Page 272: Water Well Integrity-Coal Mine - osmre.gov · Comparative Study of Domestic Water Well Integrity to Coal Mine Blasting Summary Report Prepared for June 28, 2002 Office of Surface

10

9.5

9

8.5

8

~ 7.5 c ::I

"C ,_ 7 I'll

"C c

6.5 Ill -rn -J: 6 c.

5.5

5

4.5

4

3.5 12/4/01

Shot Blast

~

12/5/01

Water pH Site WV-1 Well-2

Winter 2001

Shot Blasts

~

12/6/01 12/7/01