washington, d.c. and social and behavioral science: the picture for 2016
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Make sure your volume is set appropriately
Make sure you have followed the instructions on your keypad properly
Make sure everything is plugged in properly to assure your devices are working correctly
If you have audio or visual difficulties,
please let us know via the Question box and
we will be happy to assist you.
Please Check Your Settings
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 2: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 3: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mark D. Vieth, Senior Vice President, CRD Associates
Coordinator, Social and Behavioral Science Campaign
Michael Todd,Editor, Social Science Space
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 4: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
While we do our best to answer as many questions as we can, time constraints may not allow us to answer every question. Thank you for
understanding.
Send us your questions!Send in your questions via the Question Box on your screen. →
Using Twitter? Use the hashtag
#SocialScienceLive.
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 5: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Social Science Research in the Fiscal Year 2017 Budget
ByMark Vieth
Senior Vice President, CRD AssociatesCoordinator, Social and Behavioral Science
Campaign
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 6: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Summary
• What is the SBE Directorate?• Funding History of Social Sciences• Recent Attacks to SBE Funding• President’s FY17 Budget• Challenges in 2016 and beyond…
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 7: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What is the SBE Directorate
• Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences• One of Six Research Directorates at NSF• By far the Smallest Funded Directorate!
- Research and Related: $6 billion- SBE: $272 million in FY16 (4.5%)- BIO: $744 million in FY16
• Funds 67% of SBS research at universities• Total Awards FY15: 640 (21% funding rate)
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 8: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 9: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 10: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What is the SBE Directorate? Divisions
• Social and Economic Science (SES)• Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS)• National Center for Science and
Engineering Statistics (NCSES)• Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA)
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 11: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SBE Grants Under the Microscope
“Funds currently spent by the government on social science–including on politics of all things–would be better spent helping find cures to diseases.”
Former Majority Leader Eric Cantor, February 5, 2013
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 12: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SBE Grants Under the Microscope…
“The (Science) Committee is concerned that the Administration has lost sight of NSF's core mission in support of the physical sciences when so much funding is provided for SBE. Several recent studies conducted by NSF's SBE funding have been of questionable value, and something our nation can ill-afford. These SBE funds are better spent on higher priority scientific endeavors that have demonstrated return on investment for the American taxpayer.”
Chairman Lamar Smith letter to House Budget Committee, March, 2013
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 13: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SBE Grants Under the Microscope…
“ As NSF reviews these proposals, a question they should ask...is how will the principal purpose of this research project look in a headline in the New York Times or in a tweet?”
Rep. John Culberson, R-Tex., LA Times Interview, March 4, 2015
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 14: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SBE Funding: Congressional Activity
• America “COMPETES” Reauthorization
• Commerce Justice Science Appropriations
• The “Scientific Research in the National Interest Act.”
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 15: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
America “COMPETES”
• Statute governing the National Science Foundation and other science agencies
• 43% Cut for SBE Directorate• Approved by House Science Committee on May
8, 2015• Approved by House May 20, 2015• Currently before Senate Commerce Committee• No Action Taken in Senate!
,
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 16: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CJS Appropriations
• Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Act FY16: Funds NSF
• 16.5% Cut for SBE and Geosciences• Approved by House on June 4, 2015• Senate Bill included no cuts• Final Omnibus Appropriations freezes spending
for SBE at $272 million
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 17: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
“Scientific Research in the National Interest Act”
• Originally part of America “COMPETES” Reauthorization
• Requires determination for EACH NSF grant awarded is “in the national interest”
• Defines “national interest” with several criteria• Approved by the House on February 10, 2015• Currently before Senate HELP Committee
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 18: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
FY17 BUDGET: NSF• President’s Request for NSF: $7.964 billion
- Discretionary $7.564 billion- Mandatory $ 400 million
• $501 million over FY16 (6.7%)• Discretionary only a 1.3% increase• NSF Receives 50,000 proposals annually
- Accepts 12,000- Rejects 38,000
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 19: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Discretionary vs. Mandatory• Discretionary Spending included in annual
appropriations bills (CJS)• Mandatory approved outside of
appropriations process• Examples: Social Security, Medicare• Not Subject to Spending Caps• Separate Legislation Must be Approved by
Congress
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 20: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
FY17 BUDGET: SBE
• FY17 Budget Request: $288.8 million- Discretionary: $272.41 million- Mandatory: $16.36 million
• 6% Increase Mandatory and Discretionary• Flat Funding Discretionary only• Entire discretionary increase NCSES
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 21: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What Next?• Appropriations: Committees will begin marking
up FY17 spending bills in March.• Discretionary Spending ceilings already set by
last year’s Budget Agreement.• Unlikely that Congress will approve a one-time
R&D Mandatory Spending bill.• Unlikely that Congress will approve additional
discretionary funding for NSF.
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 22: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Challenges to SBE in 2016
• CJS Appropriations: Cuts or Damaging Language
• America COMPETES: Possible Action in Senate?
• “National Interest” Bill: Senate?• Continued Scrutiny of Individual Grants
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 23: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Good News…• Social Science is strong – our results speak for
themselves!• Science\Higher Ed Communities remain united
against picking “winners and losers” in science.• Inroads with key Republican offices.• Members of Congress don’t like to vote against
their universities!• Senate as a bulwark against rash House votes.
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 24: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
…But Stay Vigilant!
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 25: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
While we do our best to answer as many questions as we can, time constraints may not allow us to answer every question. Thank you for
understanding.
Send us your questions!
Send in your questions via the Question Box on your screen. →
Using Twitter? Use the hashtag
#SocialScienceLive.
#SocialScienceLive
![Page 26: Washington, D.C. and Social and Behavioral Science: The Picture for 2016](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070515/587692c91a28abab2f8b5d67/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Webinar recording, slides, and follow-up Q&A will be emailed to you and available on www.socialsciencespace.com
Thank you!
Mark Viethwww.dc-crd.com/
Be sure to check our website for updates on our webinar series!
#SocialScienceLive