warsaw dam removal as built report · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm...

41
AS BUILT REPORT WARSAW DAM REMOVAL

Upload: others

Post on 01-Apr-2020

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

AS BUILT REPORTWARSAW DAM REMOVAL

Page 2: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

CITY OF WARSAW, INKOSIOUSKO COUNTY

FLATLAND RESOURCES, LLCPO BOX 1293MUNCIE, IN 47308(765) 284.2328

Page 3: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

3

1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

2. PROPOSED DEMOLITION

3. PROJECT SUMMARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS1.1 PROJECT LOCATION1.2 WATERSHED1.3 DRAINAGE AREA1.4 WETLAND IMPACT1.5 ENDANGERED SPECIES IMPACT

2.1 EXISTING & PROPOSED SECTIONS2.2 ORIGINAL AS-BUILT DRAWINGS2.3 CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS2.4 SEDIMENT SAMPLING ANALYSIS2.5 EARLY COORDINATION MEETING MINUTES

3.1 CONSTRUCTION PROCESS DESCRIPTION & PHOTOS3.2 SEED MIXTURE CERTIFICATION CARD3.3 PERMIT DOCUMENTS

Page 4: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

4 DEFINITIONS

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

INDIANAPOLIS

MUNCIE

EVANSVILLE

FORT WAYNE

KOSIOUSKO COUNTY

WARSAW

PROJECT LOCATION

FIGURE 4.6-1 Project Location

FOX FARM ROAD DAM - WARSAW, IN

AGE: BUILT IN 1961, DEMOLISHED IN 2018 57 YEARSSIZE: 50’ CHANNEL WIDTH, DAM 13’ WIDE W/ (2) 8’ WING WALLSOWNERSHIP: PRIVATE LANDOWNER (UNKNOWN) CITY BUILTREASON FOR REMOVAL: NO LONGER SERVES INTENDED FUNCTION HAZARD BARRIER TO FISH & MUSSEL PASSAGEPERMITS REQUIRED: IDEM 401 ACOE 404 DNR CONSTRUCTION IN A FLOODWAYFUNDING SOURCES: INDIANA LARE (LAKES & RIVERS ENHANCEMENT) US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICEPROJECT TIMELINE: CONTRACT SIGNED EARLY COORDINATION & PERMITTING (1 YEAR) CONSTRUCTION (4 DAYS) EROSION CONTROL & SEEDING (1 DAY) AS-BUILT REPORT (2 DAYS)

Page 5: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

5CHAPTER

HUC 12 #: 051201060205NAME: WALNUT CREEK - TIPPECANOE RIVERACRES: 13,044

PROJECT LOCATION:41.257868° , -85.872307°

1.2 HUC 12 WATERSHED

FIGURE 4.6-1 Watershed Boundaries

AUBURN

WATERLOO

PROJECT LOCATION

WARSAW

Page 6: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

6 CHAPTER

1.3 DRAINAGE WATERSHED

FIGURE 4.6-1 Watershed Boundaries

PROJECT LOCATION

ACRES: 112,500

Page 7: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

7CHAPTER

1.4 WETLANDS

FIGURE 4.6-1 Wetlands Within the Local Region of Project Site.

WARSAW

PROJECT LOCATION

Page 8: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

8 CHAPTER

1.5 ENDANGERED SPECIES IMPACT

PROJECT LOCATION

Based upon the map provided by the USFWS, there are no known Clubshell mussel’s within a 0.5 mile of the project site, nor are there any other known ETR’s within the same distance. (See meeting minutes on page 19)

CITY OF WARSAW, INFLATLAND RESOURCES, LLC

0 1,200’ 2,400’

CLUBSHELL MUSSELS

0.75 MI

1.5 MI

N

Page 9: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

9CHAPTERFIGURE 4.6-1 Wetland Conditions Along Deep River

WINGWALLLEFT BANK RIGHT BANK

EXISTING DAM STRUCTURE

PROPOSED GRADING

EXISTING CHANNEL BED

SLOPE LEFT BANK TO3:1 AND TIE INTO EXISTINGGRADE

RIGHT BANK GRADEDTO MATCH EXISTING BANK SLOPE& TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE.

TOP OF DAM

TOP OF DAMCROSS SECTIONAL AREAAT BANKFULL

CROSS SECTIONAL AREAAT BANKFULL

PROPOSED CROSS SECTION

Due to the relatively simple nature of the project, no full set of construction documents were drawn up per the contract. The cross sections are representations based upon existing maps, topo data, and the original construction documents for the dam (no survey of the site was completed). Our intent is to minimize disturbance of the river bank, and to restore the banks to match the existing surrounding conditions. Based on conversations held during the early coordination meeting, no sediment will be removed as a part of the project. Therefore, no disturbance or regrading of the stream bed will occur.

EXISTING CONDITIONS:Bankfull Height: 3.2’Bankfull Width: 50’X Sectional Area: 160 SQFT

PROPOSED CONDITIONS:Bankful Height: 3.2’Bankfull Width: 62.8’X Sectional Area: 180.5 SQFT% Change in area: +12.8%

EXISTING CROSS SECTION, TYP.

Section A-A1Bankfull Width: 53.2’X Sectional Area: 286.4’X Sectional Area Related to Regional Curve: 130%**This is due to channel incision, as the bankful width is only 76% compared to the regional curve Section B-B1Bankfull Width: 50.0’X Sectional Area: 160.0’**See cross sections below for change in bankfull calculations once dam is removed

Section C-C1Bankfull Width: 78.3’X Sectional Area (Assume sand bar washed downstream): 324.2’X Sectional Area Related to Regional Curve: 150%******This appears to be a result of the wetland system north of the river.

2.1 PROPOSED DEMOLITION SECTIONS

Page 10: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

10 CHAPTER

2.2 ORIGINAL AS-BUILT PLANS (STRUCTURE)

Page 11: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

11CHAPTER

2.2 ORIGINAL AS-BUILT PLANS (STRUCTURE)

Page 12: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

12 CHAPTER

CC1

BB1

AA1

2.3 CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS

Page 13: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

13CHAPTER

AA1

BB1

CC1

100 FEET DOWNSTREAM OF DAM

AT DAM

100 FEET UPSTREAM OF DAM

2.3 CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS

Page 14: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

14 CHAPTER

SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION RATIONALE

The locations chosen for the sediment sampling locations behind the Fox Farm dam located on the Tippecanoe River were based upon the known dynamics of sediment falling out of the water and settling behind the dam. After the dam is built, the first place sediment begins to collect is directly behind the dam. As time goes on, sediment will begin to accumulate farther upstream, matching the elevation of the first dropout. At this point, a new layer of sediment is created, following the same pattern. This buildup creates a ‘history book’ of all the sediment behind the dam. By sampling closer to the dam, a snap shot is created of this entire ‘book’, instead of just the last half or quarter of it, giving a full history of any toxins or heavy metals that may be present in the sediment. See the diagram below for further explanation.

Below are the results of the sediment analysis test for the following constituents: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. Testing for these constituents was based upon conversations between the DNR and IDEM. Rationale for the location of the sampling are below the analytical results. The full analysis report can be found in Apendix A.

2.4 SEDIMENT SAMPLING

Page 15: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

15CHAPTER

SEDIMENT QUANTITY BEHIND DAM CALCULATIONApproximate Slope of Tippecanoe River = 0.048%Height of Dam: 2.75’Width of Channel: 50’2.75/0.048% = 5,729.2’ (length of sediment wedge)(5729.2*2.75*50)/2 = 393,882.5 CUFT of Sediment393,882.5/27 = 14,588 CYS of SedimentOr approximately 730 tri-axle trucks worth of sedimentApproximate sediment release per year: ~2,200 CYS (15% of total)Approximate sediment release per day: ~12,055 lbs

RANGE OF TSS (LBS/DAY) PASSING THROUGH SYSTEM @ FOX FARM DAM PER RIVER CFS

LOW FLOW HARMONIC MEAN BANKFULL 10 YR 25 YR 50 YR 100 YR

34.6 146 522 1020 1240 1410 1550MIN 2 373 1574 5628 10997 13368 15201 1671025% 6 1119 4722 16883 32990 40105 45603 50131

MEDIAN 10 1865 7870 28138 54983 66842 76006 8355275% 18 3357 14166 50649 98969 120315 136810 150394MAX 376 70128 295916 1058000 2067355 2513256 2857815 3141570

ASSUMED BNKFL 60 168830

CFS OF TIPPECANOE RIVER AT DAM, PER STREAM STATS

TSS MG/L

TSS PER IDEM STATIONS

This chart is based on data collected from StreamStats (CFS) and ‘Monitoring Water in Indiana: Choices for Nonpoint Source and Other Watershed Projects,’ (TSS) written by Jane Frankenberger & Laura Esman. The chart can be used as a comparison point for the amount of sediment released by the removal of the dam per day compared to estimated daily TSS load for Ecoregion 3 of Indiana. Note, this chart does not take into consideration the sediment loss from stream bank erosion. Based on our calculations, the sediment released by removing the dam is 7% the amount of TSS that come through the system during a bankfull event.

SED‐1 SED‐2VERY COARSE SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 9.41 9.49COARSE SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 15.41 14.41MEDIUM SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 32.89 15.08FINE SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 25.74 10.51VERY FINE SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 0.70 0.73TOTAL SAND ASTM D422‐63 % 84.2 50.2TOTAL SILT ASTM D422‐63 % 12.8 33.3TOTAL CLAY ASTM D422‐63 % 3.0 16.5TEXTURAL CLASSIFICATION ASTM D422‐63 LOAMY SAND LOAM

SAMPLE IDUNITSMETHODANALYSIS

SUMMARY OF PARTICLE SIZE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

2.4 SEDIMENT SAMPLING

Page 16: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

16 CHAPTER

Fox Farm Road Dam Removal, Tippecanoe River 2575 Westside Dr., Warsaw, IN 46580 Warsaw, IN  Early Coordination Meeting 4/13/2016  Attendees: Phil Tevis, FlatLand Resources David Heilman, FlatLand Resources Jim Emans, City of Warsaw Rod Edgell, IDNR – LARE Stephanie Trapp, IDNR – F&W Scott Fetters, USFWS Elizabeth McCloskey, USFWS Rebecca Hartman, USACE Matt Smedley, IDEM  Meeting Minutes:  Early coordination meeting was called to order at 11:45am  Jim Emans gave a brief history of the dam: 

o Built in the 1960’s as a way to ensure Center Lake could be used as drinking water supply for the City 

o Currently, the dam does not function in this capacity, as it was built farther downstream than initially designed, and other measures have been incorporated closer to Center Lake that meet the dam’s intended function 

Jim Emans explained why the City wanted the dam removed: o It is a liability for the City o Removal of the dam would open up around 150 miles of rivers and tributaries to fish 

passage  FlatLand Resources described their proposed project approach to deconstructing the dam: 

o Enter/Exit site through 2575 Westside Dr property, where meeting was being held o Grade back left bank to 3:1 slope and remove bank wing wall o Track across dam structure and remove right bank wing wall o Remove dam structure starting on the right bank and moving back towards the left bank o Stabilize about 80 feet of bank just upstream of left wing wall o Clean up project site, seed, and back out of project site o All concrete material would be hauled to and recycled at Elkhart County Gravels, about 

a mile from the project site o No wetlands will be affected by construction activities 

There is a bypass channel, about 80 feet upstream of the dam, on the right bank.  Currently, the gates to the bypass channel are closed, but could be opened to aid in construction activities, if it was deemed necessary. 

The peninsula on the right bank will stay, and not be manipulated in any way 

FLR will not use a coffer dam for construction activities.  Construction will be done during the dry season, which will make it much easier accomplish. 

No trees will be removed, except possibly for some small scrub/shrub along the right bank  A sediment curtain will be used just downstream of project site to catch any dam debris not 

collected during deconstruction  No calculations have been done to estimate the amount of sediment behind the dam, although 

this calculation can be completed if a permitting agency desires it to be done  It was determined at the meeting that no sediment sampling would be required for the project  Based upon available mussel location maps, a mussel survey would not be required  There are no other known ETR’s that would be affected by this project  There was some question as to what ACOE and IDEM permits would be required for this 

project** o Both Matt Smedley and Rebecca Hartman are looking into the proper permits for the 

project.  Bank stabilization will not be included in the project  Historic Preservation will be brought into the conversation through the initiation of the 

permitting process  Meeting was adjourned at 1:00pm  ** In an email dated April 13th, 2017, Matt Smedley clarified what IDEM & ACOE permits would be necessary for the project: NWP 53 and 401.  Minutes Prepared By: David Heilman, FlatLand Resources 

2.5 EARLY COORDINATION MEETING MINUTES

Page 17: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

17

3.1 PROJECT SUMMARYThe City of Warsaw received funds to remove a low head dam built in the 1960’s that no longer serves its intended function. Removing this dam would reduce liabilities for the City as well as open up over 150 miles of rivers and stream to fish and mussel passage on and along the Tippecanoe River.

The Contractor was able to remove the dam entirely during one full workweek, removing first the concrete sidewalls and grading the slope 3:1 back to existing grade (top left). The contractor then removed the dam itself, entirely removing all concrete and rebar (top middle, right). Once removal was completed concrete waste (bottom left) was sent to a concrete recycling plant and disturbed ground within the project bounds was seeded. Erosion control mats were used when reseeding the riverbanks with “Turfstrong Fescue” Lawn Seed Mixture (bottom right).

Demolition begins with sidewall - Loader Access Demolition begins on dam itself

Concrete waste before being shipped off-site Post-Dam Removal Streambank Erosion Control Mats & Seeding

Mostly demolished dam & waste material

Page 18: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

18 CHAPTER

3.2 SEED MIX CERTIFICATIONS

3.3 PERMIT DOCUMENTSSee following pages for permits received as follows:

Army Corp of Engineers - 404 - Discharge into a floodway

Indiana Department of Environmental Management - 401 - Water Quality Certification

Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Construction in a Floodway

SPENCE RESTORATION NURSERY SPENCE RESTORATION NURSERYRiparian Seed Mix 0.25 ACRE(S) Riparian Seed Mix 0.25 ACRE(S)

Flat Land Resources Flat Land Resources

Small Seed Large Seed

Carex vulpinoidea 16083A 6 1.50 Elymus virginicus 17251 48 12.00Cinna arundinacea 17154 2 0.50 Elymus riparius 16118 32 8.00Glyceria striata 17052 3 0.75 Spartina pectinata P-EN 12-11-17 4 1.00Juncus effusus P-E 2-8-18 1 0.25 TOTAL PLS weight 84 21.00Panicum virgatum 17192A 16 4.00Scirpus atrovirens 17089B 2 0.50Scirpus pendulus 16095 1 0.25Symphyotrichum lanceolatum 17310 2 0.50Eupatorium perfoliatum 17256 2 0.50Lobelia siphilitica 17265 1 0.25Rudbeckia laciniata P-SS 6-5-17 4 1.00Verbena hastata P-AG 1-9-18 4 1.00TOTAL PLS weight 44 11.00

SPENCE RESTORATION NURSERY SPENCE RESTORATION NURSERYWet Mesic Prairie 1 ACRE(S) Wet Mesic Prairie 1 ACRE(S)

Temporary Crop Cover Temporary Crop Cover

Annual Ryegrass 5 5.00 Seed Oats 32 32.00TOTAL PLS weight 5 5.00 TOTAL PLS weight 32 32.00

Bag _________ of _________ Bag Weight: Bag _________ of _________ Bag Weight:

Species PLS weight (lb)/acre

PLS weight (lb)/mix

Species PLS weight (oz)/acre

PLS weight (oz)/mixLot #

Bag _________ of _________ Bag Weight:

Species PLS weight (lb)/acre

PLS weight (lb)/mix

Species PLS weight (oz)/acre

PLS weight (oz)/mix

Bag _________ of _________ Bag Weight:

Lot #

TURF SEED MIX NATIVE RIPARIAN ZONE SEED MIX (USED W/ EROSION CONTROL MATS)

Page 19: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 20: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 21: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 22: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 23: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 24: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 25: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 26: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 27: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 28: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 29: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 30: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 31: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 32: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 33: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 34: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 35: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm
Page 36: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

STREAMFW-28904

City of WarsawJames Emans102 South Buffalo StreetWarsaw, IN 46580FlatLand Resources LLCDavid HeilmanPO Box 1293Muncie, IN 47308-1293IC 14-28-1 with 312 IAC 10An existing low head dam will be removed from the channel. A sediment curtainwill be set up downstream of project site to catch any debris not collected duringdeconstruction of the dam. The contractor will begin construction activities bygrading back the left bank behind the dam wing wall to a 3:1 slope, then removingthe wall. The excavator will then track across the top of the dam, remove theright wing wall, and stabilize the right bank behind the wall. Starting at the rightbank, the excavator will then remove the dam as it backs out of the channel andback onto the left bank. All dam materials will be hauled off site to a localconcrete recycling plant. The banks behind the existing wing walls will bestabilized with seed, straw and geotextile fabric. Details of the project arecontained in information received electronically at the Division of Water on May 1,2017 and in plans and information received at the Division of Water on May 8,2017, June 2, 2017 and July 5, 2017.Approximately 400 feet downstream of the Fox Farm Road stream crossing nearWarsaw, Wayne Township, Kosciusko CountySection 6, T 32N, R 6E, Leesburg QuadrangleUTM Coordinates: Downstream 4567996 North, 594472 East

James J. Hebenstreit, PE, Assistant DirectorDivision of WaterAugust 21, 2017

Tippecanoe River

Included: Notice Of Right To Administrative Review - General Conditions - Special Conditions - Service List

APPLICATION #

APPLICANT

AGENT

AUTHORITYDESCRIPTION

LOCATION

APPROVED BY

APPROVED ON

: : :

:

: :

:

:

:

MAILED: August 21, 2017

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVALCONSTRUCTION IN A FLOODWAY

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

Page 37: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

This signed document constitutes the issuance of a permit by the Department of Natural Resources,subject to the conditions and limitations stated on the pages entitled "General Conditions" and "SpecialConditions".The permit or any of the conditions or limitations which it contains may be appealed by applying foradministrative review. Such review is governed by the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act, IC4-21.5, and the Department's rules pertaining to adjudicative proceedings, 312 IAC 3-1.In order to obtain a review, a written petition must be filed with the Division of Hearings within 18 days ofthe mailing date of this notice. The petition should be addressed to:

Natural Resources CommissionDivision of Hearings

Indiana Government Center North, Room N103100 North Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2200The petition must contain specific reasons for the appeal and indicate the portion or portions of the permitto which the appeal pertains.If an appeal is filed, the final agency determination will be made by the Natural Resources Commissionfollowing a legal proceeding conducted before an Administrative Law Judge. The Department of NaturalResources will be represented by legal counsel.

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWAPPLICATION #: FW- 28904

Page 38: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

If any archaeological artifacts or human remains are uncovered during construction, federal law and regulations (16 USC 470, et seq.; 36 CFR 800.11, etal) and State Law (IC 14-21-1) require that work must stop and that the discovery must be reported to the Division of Historic Preservation andArchaeology within 2 business days.

This permit must be posted and maintained at the project site until the project is completed.This permit does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility for obtaining additional permits, approvals, easements, etc. as required by other federal,state, or local regulatory agencies. These agencies include, but are not limited to:

This permit must not be construed as a waiver of any local ordinance or other state or federal law.This permit does not relieve the permittee of any liability for the effects which the project may have upon the safety of the life or property of others.This permit may be revoked by the Department of Natural Resources for violation of any condition, limitation or applicable statute or rule.This permit shall not be assignable or transferable without the prior written approval of the Department of Natural Resources. To initiate a transfer contact:

The Department of Natural Resources shall have the right to enter upon the site of the permitted activity for the purpose of inspecting the authorized work.The receipt and acceptance of this permit by the applicant or authorized agent shall be considered as acceptance of the conditions and limitations statedon the pages entitled "General Conditions" and "Special Conditions".

Agency Telephone NumberKosciusko County Drainage BoardUS Army Corps of EngineersIndiana Department of Environmental ManagementLocal city or county planning or zoning commission

DirectorDivision of Water

Room W264402 West Washington Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204Telephone: (317) 232-4160, Toll Free: (877) 928-3755

FAX: (317) 233-4579

Division of Historic Preservation and ArchaeologyRoom W274

402 West Washington StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204

Telephone: (317) 232-1646, FAX: (317) 232-8036

(574) 372-2367(574) 232-1952(317) 233-8488 or (800) 451-6027

( 1 )

( 2 ) ( 3 )

( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 ) ( 7 )

( 8 ) ( 9 )

GENERAL CONDITIONSAPPLICATION #: FW- 28904

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

Page 39: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

This permit is valid for 24 months from the "Approved On" date shown on the first page.If construction work in the floodway has not been completed by August 21, 2019 thepermit will become void. This permit may be renewed one (1) time if a written request isreceived by DNR, Division of Water prior to August 21, 2019. Thereafter the permit willbecome void and a new permit will be required in order to continue work on the project.This permit becomes effective 18 days after the "MAILED" date shown on the first page.If both a petition for review and a petition for a stay of effectiveness are filed before thispermit becomes effective, any part of the permit that is within the scope of the petition forstay is stayed for an additional 15 days.Other than those measures necessary to satisfy the "General Conditions" and "SpecialConditions", the project must conform to the information received by the Department ofNatural Resources on: May 1, 2017, May 8, 2017, June 2, 2017 and July 5, 2017. Anydeviation from the information must receive the prior written approval of the Department.

PERMIT VALIDITY

CONFORMANCE

:

:

Number Special Condition( 1) revegetate all bare and disturbed areas within the project area using a mixture of

grasses (excluding all varieties of tall fescue), sedges, and wildflowers native to NorthernIndiana and specifically for stream bank/floodway stabilization purposes as soon aspossible upon completion

( 2) minimize and contain within the project limits inchannel disturbance and the clearing oftrees and brush

( 3) do not work in the waterway from April 1 through June 30 without the prior writtenapproval of the Division of Fish and Wildlife

( 4) do not construct any temporary runarounds or causeways( 5) minimize the movement of resuspended bottom sediment from the immediate project

area( 6) do not deposit or allow demolition/construction materials or debris to fall or otherwise

enter the waterway( 7) appropriately designed measures for controlling erosion and sediment must be

implemented to prevent sediment from entering the stream or leaving the constructionsite; maintain these measures until construction is complete and all disturbed areas arestabilized

( 8) seed and protect disturbed stream banks that are 3:1 or steeper with heavy-duty net-freebiodegradable erosion control blankets to minimize the entrapment and snaring of smallwildlife such as snakes and turtles (follow manufacturer's recommendation forinstallation); seed and apply mulch on all other disturbed areas

( 9) do not excavate or place fill in any riparian wetland( 10) use a silt curtain downstream of the dam to catch any accidental construction debris and

reduce the amount of sediment released into the water during the dam removal process

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

SPECIAL CONDITIONSAPPLICATION #: FW- 28904

Page 40: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

( 11) all plant material, mud, and debris must be removed and all water drained from anyequipment before entering or leaving the waterway to prevent the spread of aquatic andterrestrial invasive species

( 12) ensure that equipment and machinery are in good operating condition, clean (powerwashed), free of leaks, excess oil, and grease; do not refuel or service equipment within100 feet of any watercourse or surface water drainage

( 13) ensure hydraulic machinery, if required, uses environmentally-sensitive hydraulic fluidsthat are non-toxic to aquatic life and that are readily or inherently biodegradable

( 14) place all excavated material landward of the floodway *( 15) all work must conform with the existing bank at the upstream and downstream limits of

the project site( 16) do not leave felled trees, brush, or other debris in the floodway *( 17) upon completion of the project, remove all construction debris from the floodway *( 18) provide written notification within 60 days after project completion, that the structure has

been removed to the Division of Water's Dam Safety Section, 402 West WashingtonStreet Room W264, Indianapolis, IN, 46204

( 19) any equipment and/or cables placed on the waterway must be clearly marked withnavigation buoys described in 312 IAC 5-4 in a manner that would be visible to anykayak/recreation users in the area

( 20) any equipment and/or cables left in the waterway in times of limited visibility must, inaddition to the requirement listed above, be marked with flashing amber warning lightsand reflective signage warning kayak/recreational users of the hazards

( 21) * NOTE: for regulatory purposes, the floodway is defined as that shown on Panel 163 ofthe Kosciusko County Flood Insurance Rate Map dated September 30, 2015

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

SPECIAL CONDITIONSAPPLICATION #: FW- 28904

Page 41: WARSAW DAM REMOVAL AS BUILT REPORT · total sand astm d422‐63 % 84.2 50.2 total silt astm d422‐63 % 12.8 33.3 total clay astm d422‐63 % 3.0 16.5 textural classificationastm

City of WarsawJames Emans102 South Buffalo StreetWarsaw, IN 46580

FlatLand Resources LLCDavid HeilmanPO Box 1293Muncie, IN 47308-1293

Kyle Blackwell2413 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Larry and Sue Bolinger2505 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Mark Brunner2507 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

William and Diane Burr2501 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Harley Carney2511 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Fred and Sherri DiRico1304 River Crest DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Gale Emmons2415 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Leonard and Linda Goble630 Zimmer RoadWarsaw, IN 46580

Alan and Diane Grindle2601 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Michael and Amelia Grubbs2065 North Fox Farm RoadWarsaw, IN 46580

Keith Harris5315 South County Farm RoadClaypool, IN 46510

Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesDivision of Law EnforcementDistrict 1 Headquarters9822 North Turkey Creek RoadSyracuse, IN 46567

Kurt KaufmanPO Box 1142Warsaw, IN 46581

Kosciusko County Drainage BoardCounty SurveyorCourthouse, Room 103100 West Center StreetWarsaw, IN 46580-2872

Kosciusko County SWCD217 East Bell DriveWarsaw, IN 46582

Stephen Neher2411 Westside DriveWarsaw, IN 46580

Clarence and Kathy PanchisonPO Box 127Wapiti, WY 82450

Juan and Erica Parra41 West North StreetMilford, IN 46542

David Sanchez2131 North Fox Farm RoadWarsaw, IN 46580

Matthew SandyCourt House, 3rd Floor100 West Center StreetWarsaw, IN 46580-2773

Dirck Sheal2151 North Fox Farm RoadWarsaw, IN 46850

US Army Corps of EngineersDetroit District, Michiana Branch2422 Viridian Drive, Suite 200South Bend, IN 46628

: Larissa Muellner, CFM: Larissa Muellner, CFM: J. Matthew Buffington: Stephanie Trapp

Staff Assignment:AdministrativeTechnicalEnvironmentalFish and Wildlife

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESSTATE OF INDIANA

SERVICE LISTAPPLICATION #: FW- 28904