IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDSDIVISION OF ST. CROIX

MOHAMMAD HAMED, by hisauthorized agent WALEED HAMED,

P I ai ntiff/Co u nte rcl ai m Defe nd a nt,

VS

FATHI YUSUF and UNITED CORPORATION,

Defe nda nts a nd Cou ntercl ai m a nts.

VS.

WALEED HAMED, WAHEED HAMED,MUFEED HAMED, HISHAM HAMED, andPLESSEN ENTERPR¡SES, INC.,

Cou nterclaim Defendants,

MOHAMMAD HAMED,

Plaintiff,

VS.

FATHI YUSUF,

Defendant

Gase No. : SX-2O12-CV -37O

ACT¡ON FOR DAMAGES,INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ANDDECLARATORY RELIEF

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case No. : SX-201 4-CV -27 8

ACTION FOR DEBT ANDCONVERSION

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MOHAMMAD HAMED,

Plaintiff,

Case No. : SX-201 4-CV -287

ACTION FOR DEBT ANDCONVERSION

VS

UNITED CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendant

REPLY TO YUSUF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE THE,, REVISED BDO REPORT''

Page 2 - Hamed's Reply to Yusuf's Opposition to Motion to Strike BDO Report

Despite Yusuf's efforts to put a positive spin on it, Judge Brady's scathing

criticism of the BOO report gutted it. Undaunted, Yusuf now submits a "revised" BOO

report, reduced from 62 pages to a 1 page accounting spreadsheet. Yusuf touts this

declaration as a "compilation" of offsetting claims. The revised spreadsheet is still

defective, as it is nothing more than a simple invasion into the tasks assigned to the

Special Master. Moreover, additional 'discovery' will not correct this obvious flaw.

I. The revised BDO report improperly attempts to usurp the Master's role

The revised BOO report tries to "package' an "expert opinion" about multiple,

individual claims into one "super claim", seeking $4.5 million from Hamed, as a "stand­

alone" single claim. It is not. Instead, BDO's revised report is an attempt to decide

multiple claims that the Master needs to resolve -- without any evidentiary or

testimonial support -- and then group them into one "claim." However, the task of

verifying or rejecting each of these claims (and any offsets) one at a time, is for

the Special Master to decide based on actual evidence, not BOO's say so.

A review of this revised report confirms that each entry is a separate claim that

cannot be lumped together, as the Master must find that each one is valid. For example:

1. BOO still seeks to 'assess' Waleed (Wally) Hamed for $1,778,103 for "Amount owed by Hamed family to Yusuf as per agreement before raid Sept 2001." (Emphasis added). See Exhibit 1. However, as noted in the reply seeking to strike this claim, filed at the same time as this response, Judge Brady made it clear that transactions that predated September 17, 2006, were now barred. Thus, the inclusion of this claim in the "revised" BOO report is in direct violation of this Court's order. More to the point here, only the Master, not BDO, can decide if this claim is still valid or is barred.

2. BOO allocates $4.1 million in attorney's fees to Hamed and $237,691 to Yusuf for the defense of the criminal case. Those "accounting entries" actually consist of "findings" that this allocation is appropriate, which is a finding reserved for the Special Master, not BDO.1

1 BOO still ignores the un-contradicted declaration of Gordon Rhea, the lawyer who headed up the legal team for the criminal case, submitted at the March 6th hearing that all legal work was done jointly on behalf of all of the Yusuf/Hamed defendants, so that such an allocation was improper. See Exhibit 7 to Hamed's initial motion re BOO.

Page 3 - Hamed's Reply to Yusuf's Opposition to Motion to Strike BDO Report

3. Yusuf argues on pp. 10-12 of its opposition that BOO did take into account the factthat Mafi Hamed earned rents outside of his Plaza income, attaching Table 26B fromBOO's report for Scotia account 9811 that supposedly supports this argument.However, a review of that table confirms that BOO did not make any suchadjustment for the years prior to 2012, despite Mafi's testimony that all depositsinto this account were rent from a business unrelated to Plaza Extra. SeeExhibit 2. Thus, this obviously incorrect allocation is STILL in the BOO report andSTILL consists of a "finding" that this bank account contains partnershipwithdrawals.2 More to the point, not only is this "accounting entry" incorrect, but itinvolves a finding reserved for the Master.

4. BOO includes the Hamed $2.7 million claim (conceded by Yusuf) as simply anaccounting entry, which it then offsets with other claims, even though that is apending claim now before the Master to decide, as will be the case regarding anyoffsetting claims. Again, BDO is attempting to replace the Master.

These few examples make it clear that Yusuf is trying to use this "revised" BOO report

to have BOO make "findings" that are in fact separate "judgments" as to ultimate issues

-- decisions entrusted to the Special Master, not BOO.

In short, each BOO accounting entry constitutes a separate claim. While Yusuf is

free to raise any claims that Hamed withdrew funds to which he is entitled to an offset,

he must present evidence proving each such specific claim to the Special Master,

not just say "allow it because BOO says so" in an accountant's "compilation" summary.

II. Yusuf's request to do more discovery will not correct this fatal flaw

Because the very nature of the revised BOO report is flawed, no amount of

discovery will cure this defect. Indeed, the mere suggestion that this report may be

further modified "after discovery" runs afoul of the Bar Orders entered in this

accounting phase. BOO's $4.5 million claim is set, which is nothing more than an

unwarranted intrusion into the Master's task of deciding claims. Thus, further discovery

2 See Exhibit 2, attached hereto, with markings in red where no such alleged adjustment was made. It is amazing that Yusuf argues that Mafi's March 6th testimony was addressed by BOO, when no adjustment was made. When will such antics stop?

Page 4- Hamed's Reply to Yusuf's Opposition to Motion to Strike BOO Report

would be a waste of time and resources, further delaying this matter, as such discovery

will not cure this fatal defect. It would also contravene Judge Brady's orders.

Ill. Conclusion

The revised BOO report--that "packages" multiple "findings" into an alleged single

"claim" of $4.5 million--should be stricken as invading the province of the Special

Master, who has been entrusted with the sole responsibility of making such findings.

Moreover, additional discovery will not change the simple fact that it is the Special

Master, not BOO, who has been entrusted to make these decisions. Thus, BDO's

one page "compilation" should be stricken now, allowing the Master to make all

decisions on each individual claim, rather than allowing BOO to try grouping such

findings it made into a single claim.

Dated: January 22, 2017 e . olt, Esq. w Offices of Joel H. Holt

132 Company Street, Christiansted, VI 00820 Email: holtvi@aol.com Tele: (340) 773-8709 Fax: (340) 773-867

Carl J. Hartmann Ill, Esq. 5000 Estate Coakley Bay, L6 Christiansted, VI 00820 Email: carl@carlhartmann.com

Page 5 - Hamed's Reply to Yusuf's Oppositíon to Motion to Strike BDO Report

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of January, 2018, I served a copy of theforegoing by email (via Case Anywhere ECF), as agreed by the parties, on:

Hon. Edgar Ross, Special Master% edgarrossjudge@hotmai l. com

Gregory H. HodgesStefan HerpelCharlotte PerrellLaw House, 10000 Frederiksberg GadeP.O. Box 756St. Thomas, Vl 00802ghodges@dtflaw.com

Mark W. EckardHamm, Eckard, LLP5030 Anchor WayChristiansted, Vl 00820mark@markeckard.com

Jeffrey B. C. MoorheadCRT Brow Building1132 King Street, Suite 3Christiansted, Vl 00820jeffreym I aw@yahoo. com

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIAN RULE 6-1(e)

This document complies with the page or word lim set forth in Rule 6-1(e)

and Feuerzeig, II-P |TEU #4 rTEil #2ITEH #1t riCdCapocËonCnr¡lllo- Sil-tZ{V-99

calc¡.|*in of AÁftqrJ brørn æ of witÉarab from

Surmryof f$thtarÉ

l{otc:I Td-¡¡ a¡rn¡¡E hûÈ ðd¡d¡nsfs nrú for witËar,l* h ãtló.

b mL

7 t /1,5üt.frl).m5 5 I 5 5 s 5 í.fln.

t /tlnprurr$þwúth a

237,3fi;L75/ I 737,fl.75t /

qreourt beføe rail 5çt ãIX. As

lffol tdirury üEe ti*dr H€rÞ(Reñr b l-.sttr fred A.rgust 15,

b õt

l.zE,l03.m 1,77E,ilIJm

)l@ todì¡d Fties c¡hùdf oflldr¡d/Yurf with pÛrrlþ ñ¡C eitlÞrwitlr ddEBrdleds

Ã1,311.m/

20'31l.m

3,7¿p,ffi.4 3n $5.-gt 4,121,651.13h¡ñnr*s to Attrnsp with partnr${*ñrô

F¡r¡ds msived bvøtÉert ffi

p 1.!þ.9¡ 5.7ËJú:L23 .rÐ.Þ itt{tÈtt

tobdt¡d m.rrts 16,56_80 430,439.13 1m,(m-(tr rÉ,9f,9.5ó 5l0,6t.ft t,3ó4JÉfÉ

to {n$L4-m r79,Ë-ro 6n,611.tu

t¡rffi ffilsdd¡Éff ta¡ ruürns

¡ ¡¡llh'*Jrd¡ tú,58r gH.fl

llã rut 5 5 {tll!ß.l, s f,il1- s 5l! 0ótrt i t tr.ot ta

r

EXHIBIT

eE2

ITET #3

BDOùrdley, Topperalld Feuerzeig, LLP

itof¡arnmad lfuned v. Fathi Yusuf and United CorporationCivil No- 9(-12-CV-99 (October 20Ol to ltecember 20f 2)

Accourt ûrnecFinancial l¡rstih¡tion:Type cfÁccouneAccount Number:

,tttrfeed Hamed / Watly Hamed

Scotiabank

Checking Account

058'1560981'l

Barred by JudgeBrady's Opinion

2mr lot15t2fm1 10t1t2ú1 $ 5,mo.(x) s 4,000-00 A' Br'l2001 11t15t2æ',1 No depæit -/ 72û1 12t15t2fr1 No deposit 2

TotalYear 2ü11 s,(X)O.00 (1,æO.(Xr) 4,(X10.(xt

2ün 1t1512fJ0,2 No deposit a 22îm zl15tzgtz Nodepæit -a 2z(m 3t1512902 3t8t20fJ'2 -æ 3,980.(I)s B2W2 4t15t2æ2 Nodçær- 2betræm lløy ond Augustwere not

2m2 9t13t2ßm No availabte -/ 13,0(n_ü) 13,o()o.m Az$2 9t13t2æ2 No availabte

^a7 2,5(þ-(I) 2,5ü)-00 A

7ñ2 9t13r2ñL Noanilab 2,500.m 2,Nn.æ A2ß2 9t13t2ffi2 No 2,000-m 2,(n0-ü) A2fm2 9r13tami¿ labte 100.m ræ-(x) A70fJ2 9t1y2(n2 available 1,t¡o.fx) 1,s(xr.q) A2ú2 9tßtænz ./ Noavailabte 2,4n-û z,Æo-x) A2W2 9t13t2æ2 ./ No available 4,410.ü) 4,110-û AlIm 9113t No available 3,700-(x) 3,7fi).00 A2ñ2 9t1 No ayailable 3,5m.(x) 3,500.00 A2ú2 2æ2 t{o avaitabte 1,500-m r,500.æ A

Tot¡l Year Z(þ2 11 4

Stotements futuve 2(m a¡ü Decenfrlr 2006 were rct waíIúle.

Tíck¡n¿rks.¡

N cteYear Ståt€ment Dâte Tracsac,tior Date ^,.rlusteC ÄmDUntD epos it s Adj ustment

EXHIBIÏ

Àa

g.Be=

Barred by JudgeBrady's Opinioin

2m6 111512û7 l2l20.r2û6 1,4(n-00 ./ 1,4(þ-00 A2M 1n5t2ú7 12t20t2lil6 2,(n0.00 / 2,ü)0.m A

Tdal Year 2O06 3,4(X,.(X¡

mú 1t15t2ffi7 1|9tm7 1,400.q) .a 1,4æ.ffi A2æ7 1t1y2ün 119tzüJ' 3,030-fx) .a 3,030.(x1 Azwn 1r15t2û7 1t1U2(m o-691 (0.ó0) 4,3m7 7115tzúI 2I9tAút 1,3 1,355-00

^2W7 2t15t2æ7 u9nün 5.00 2,595.m ANI 2115t2m¡7 ußtm7 ,a 1-T' (r.30) 4,3zWI 3t15t2ú7 3tztzúI .a 3,030.00 3,030.(n A20lJi7 3115t?fntr 3t2tzü7 ./ l,(no.q) 1,000.ü) A2ün 3t15r2út 3t1412W7 2,145-(n.a 2,145.æ Aztrn 3t15t2W7 3t14t2ú7 ,/ 7 3,030.00 3,030.(x) A

3r15t2gÍ7 UStmt 1/ 1.20 (1.20) 4,34tËtm7 +t12. 3.m (3.00) Ar3

2ñ7 5t15t2ñf 4t24 2,1U)-ú z,lm-00 AaUTI 5115t2fi7 4?tr.7 l,&)o-ql 1,E(I¡.ü) A2ffi7 5t15t2@7 1_4 i1.40)

^'3ztfrI 6t15t2W7 ,/a stzyx$r 7m.æ 700.m A2æ7 6t15t2ñ7 / 5tz3t2ur7 3,6(xr.m 3,ó(n.00 A2fr17 6t15t2wr ./ 614t2û7 975.67 975-67 A2UI7 6t15t 6|4t2ü17 ,7_1E 57.18 A2007 6t15t 6t1t2üïr lfb-73 1ú.73 A2011t 6l 6t7tzüIt 4lJt-æ Æt.æ A2007 5t?oûI 6lzotTxn 7,790-u) 1,780.00 A2UI7 ,/4711512æ7 6rmtzffn 1,400.m 1,400.m A20[n a 7t15r2wt 7tgtzæil 1,325-q' 1,325.00 Azffif t 7t15I2Un 7l9t[n7 2,ü10.00 2,(x)o-(x) A20o7 ,/ 8l15taffn 7I1Urn7 700.m 7æ-fl) Az0s7.a Et1s|zfin 7t1U2$7 2,2E5.(x} 2,285.û A

8115t2lüJi7 8t512ñI I,100-ü) 1,1(x¡.(x)^EI15I2üTI Et6t2ffii 7æ.m 700.ú A

.a M7t 8n5t2m7 En5t2N7 1.4 (r-.l{)1 À32@7 9r1st2x[7 911412ffi7 0-ó0 (0.60) Á"3

Y ear Statement Date Transaction D¡te Deposits Äd justment Adjuste, ÂmountTicþ.merks;

Rents Collected by Mafi Hamedunrelated to Partnership, butallocated as a Partnershipwithdrawal by BDO

2ü// 10lt5t2ür7 9n9tzvtf 3,695.fl) A10115t?ßn 9t19tN| 3,(Iþ.00 3,(no.m A10r15tzmir 10n5tztfi, 0.90 (0.90 3naI 11t1512011 11nslzgn 0.30 (0.30) 3zgn 1Zn5tZW7 11t20t2w7 2,585.m 2,585.q! A

2Un 12t15tZUÐ 11I20tafiIt 6,04o.æ 6,W.û Azffn 12t15t7U)7 t2t14t2tr17 1.E0 (r.E0) Ar3Total 53,934.0E 53,921.5E(r

2m8 u15t2W8 lIEíZWS 1,4ü).00 f ,4ü).00 A20æ 1I15lrn8 lt9t2ffi 1,loo.0o 1,lo().m A2æ8 tr15t2t08 1tzstzñt 0-q! (oe0) 320m 2115tZW 1 4,400_00 4,ffi-ql A?(xE 2115t2t[ß 1lz4taftJ8 z,1(x).(n 2,f00.û, Azn8 2115tZæE 2t15tZtJE 1.9) (f.8o) 320G 3t15t2ffi8 3t14tM8 l,&0-æ 1,¿m-m A2(IB 3l15tzmlE 3lutxm 4,9ü)-tX) 4,gff).(n Az(xB 311yxn8 3111t2û8 tm (1.201 Ar32fi18 4t15t2æE 4l15rz0Û8 5,3fL{n 5,35(l-(tr A2æ8 1t15t2Uß 4t15taffi f,700.00 1,700_m A2mE 4/15tzma 4t15t2@E 0.60 (0.60) À32008 5t15tzql8 5115tz0/8 l.&) (r.80)2008 6/15/2m8 6t4tzffi 1,3m.(I) f ,ïx¡.00 A

611512æ8 614t2gß 2,8ü).(n 2,800.m A6115taffi ulym 0.30 (0.30) 3

2üIB 7r15tZW 6126ITß 2,400.m 2,&.æ A2(m 7115t2lJ08 6t26t2Íß 2,200-m 2,2m.(I)

7l15t2W 7I15IM 1-m (1.æt Ar32m8 8115t?:ú8 8115t?,tJ8, o-90 (0.e01 A!3

vnsrctowtloble.2(xts 10t15tzffß 9lßt?lIJÆ, 3,0i10.(x) 3,(Xo.(n A2m8 10t15tzffi 9nÛtz(ß 1,s(n.m 1,500-m A2m8 10115tzolJ8 9t24t2W 1,74O.æ 1,74O.út A

ton5tzffiE 9r24t2tJ8 1,4ü).m 1,400.00 A2m8 10l15nofß 10t1012ÍXß 1,yz0.(n 1,920.ú A

krnarks¡Note

Y ear Statement Date Transactjcn Date D eoos'ì s

Rents Collected by Mafi Hamedunrealted to Partnerhship, butallocated as a Partnershipwithdrawal by BDO

2m 10t15t?ffi 10t10rzIJli 2,2æ.(n AzmE 1 10l15t?ffi 1_50 (r.5o) A32(m 11t1 11t15t21ß 1.ZO (1.20) A32m8 1n5tzffi No depost't 22üE 7t15t2ñ9 12t31t¿0lJß 71.55 74.55 ATdal Year 20OE 44935.95 I 1?,,

TW 1It5t2trJ9 1tuzún 4n.æ 4æ.Cf) A2W 1r15t2009 IITIAUD 1,400-00 1,4æ.n A2W ln5tzæ9 líEízfm9 3,450.m A200f) 1t1stzwg 1I13IN) +w.(n 4,W.(n Aw 1t15t2mD ll13r2gJ, f ,280.(I) 1,2E0-fn

^2ß) 2t15t2æ9 ltzltzw) 2,5/'/J.-(n A2ß 7t1 1l23tztß' 7to-æ Tto-w AM 2t15t2W 2n3t2W) 0-90 (0.e0) Ar32W 2t 5,819.q) 5,Elg-m Â2W 3tËt?lIlg ut7 Tto-æ no-00 Axß 4t15t2$9 3t37t2æ9 TTO.@ A20ut 4t15t2üJ9 3t31t7ú9 7,24lJ'-ü)2W 4115t2ætt 4I1I2Wt 3,il)o-m 3,000.fx)

A

2W 4115t2lIJ') 4tat2fJ'B 2,930-(þ 2,93().fX' A200f) t2æ9 no-æ no.w A

5115t7û9 412ßr2ru, 1,690.-(n 4,ó90.m2fr9 5115IZW9 5t9t1ffi9 4p:n-(n 4,gm-qt A2ffi 5t1 5t912{n9 1,TIO.û 1,27O.æ A2W9 611 6tu2æe I,mo.m t,000.q) Â

6t15t2æ9 6t3r?:W9 2,170.m A2W 6t15t2æ9 6111l2[n9 2,5(Xr.(I) Azû9 7l15t2W 7l10tm9 3,ft60.00 A2æ9 711 Tnotzqn 1,ilO.(n f,54o.(x) Azlng 8115t2W9 8t3r2æ9 2,9ü)-flt 2,9(x)-m A2æ9 8t3r2ñ9 2,ó05.m 2,605.00 Az(w t5r2g09 8t14t2ñ9 0-60 (0.60) Ar32M 15tzffi 9tu?frg 3,510-Ul Azgw 9115Ãn9 9t2tzxtg Tro-æ Tto-æ A

Yea r Stàteinent Dàte Tr¡,rsar-tio¡ Date 0 epos tt s c k ma rks/Note

ItI

Rents collected by Mafi Hamedunrelated to Partnership, butallocated as a Partnershipwithdrawal by BDO

2W 9t15t?ñ9 9n5t2æ9 1-5f)2:W9 10t15t20t, 10tEt2ñ9 2,27O.(n 2,270.(n A7û9 10t75tzxn ßr8/zmg 3,770-m 3,77O-æ A2W 10115t2ffi 10t8t?ffi9 7,(xx).00 7,(m-æ A2W 10115tzjIJ9 10t15t2rw) t.m (1.20) Á"3zflæ 11t15tm9 11t3tzffi TIO-Ut no-n

^zwg 11n5t2æ9 11n3tzffi' 0-60 4,32W 11n5tzclJl) 11t3t7ffi) 3,E75.(n 3,875.00 AlUUAng Tto.æ 7IO.æ

^2W 1Zt15tzw 12t2t2æ9 1,TfO-90 1,no.ül A2009 12n5t2ü¡9 1219t2W9 2,Oß-(n 2,O4O.æ A2W 12t15t2ß u9t2n9 1,(n0-m 1,000.q) A2W lzt15t2W 12t15tZW 1 (r.20) À3Total Year 2flXl (é.0o) u,o2g.æ

2410 1t 117t2010 2,310.(n 2,3r0.00 A0 n5/,2010 1r13t2æ 1.20 {r.20) A320r0 2lt5t?o10 ?'t1u2010 LN (r.50) A.3

?:0lo 5tm10 31312010 6,940_(I) 6,940.q) A2010 3115t2010 3t10t7ß10 1,640-ú 4,64p..U) À2010 3t15t2t10 3r1sIZttO 0.60 4,32010 4t15t2010 4t15t2010 1_70 (f.2o) ,U3avo 5115t2û9 5I3tm10 6,890.(I) A7010 511512W9 5t14rZß10 0.90 (o.c À320f0 6t15t?:010 6/,13r?O10 0.6(t (0.60) 4,32010 7115t2010 7t2t2t10 7 $0-q¡ ¿330.00 A2010 7n5t2010 7115t2010 1.20 (1.20) Ár32010 8t15t2010 7t21t20ß 3,010.00 3,010.q) A2010 u$tm10 8t13tzoto 1.E0 (r.8[rl Ä!3

9t15t2010 yß1m10 4r20.qt 6,120-û A2010 9t1512010 9tß1m10 0.90 (0-e0) Ar32010 10115t2010 1014t2010 4540.æ 4,54O-(n A2010 10t15t2010 1011 1.m (1.20) 4,32010 1lt15tzo10 l1t3t20to 0/m.m 4,040.00 A2010 11t15t2010 11115t2010 0.90 (0.eo) À3

'/ear Siatement D¿te Transaction Date Deposìts Â,J; u:

Rents collected by Mafì Hamedunrelated to Partnership , butallocated as a Partnershipwithdrawal by BDO

2010 12I15nlJl,O 1 14t2010 500.m 5m.æ Am10 12t15t2010 12t14t201O ó(n.00 óæ-ql AzInO 12t15t2010 12,t15t2010 4120-m 6,12ß-û

^Tdal Year 201O 53,052.(x)

zo11 uËtn11 u6tzoll 6æ-m ó00.(x) A?o11 1n5t2011 1tfitm1t l,t{o.m 1,54O-m A20f1 2l$1m11 |/21t2011 2,ó50.m 2,65/J..(n A201 3t15t2011 319t2011 43s0.æ 4,31).m A2ß71 3t15t2011 3t15tm11 1-90 (r.e0) 32011 4ll5nfi1 41151201t 0.30 (0.30) A3m11 5t15t2011 519t2ß11 ¿340.æ 7,yf)-û AT)t 6/'1512011 6t1512011 2,5().(xl L5É/0..ú Am11 l_60ì6115t20í1 6n5t2011 0.60 Ar3

,11ìm71 7tÉtm11 711512011 1.æ À32011 8tt5t2t11 8t1t2011 7,975-(n 7,1n5-(n A2011 8t15tZO11 Er15t2011 o.90 (0.90t 4,3zJ11 9t15t2011 ETWMI 3,t/o(p 3,tto.fx) A2011 9t15tZOl1 9115ngf 3,4úr-û 3,409.00 A2ß11 9n5t2011 911512011 1-60 (t.60) Ar32011 101ßtm11 10tßtm11 1,(n0.00 (1,0oo.ml 4,42011 11t15t2011 10I76tI)11 1,(þ0.(n (1,(In-00) ìb420tl 11t15t2311 17t3t2011 2,310.m 2,31o-(xl A2011 11115t2011 1v812ß11 2,940-æ 2,940.00 A2011 12115tm11 11t22t?Ol1 EfT'.æ 8m.m A2011 12t15t2011 12115t2011 1-2Í) (r.20) A3Tdd Year 2011 {.2,O52-70 (2.m8- 40,041.OO

2012 1n5tm12 11912ù12 5,4f¡.fi) (2,31O-m) 3,140.m À52012 1t15t2012 1IßIMN 0.90 (0.e01 4,32012 2t15t2012 1t25t2ú2 1,4în.n 1,4{X}_ü) A2ß12 2t15tZO12 2t1417012 3,210.(n Ì,f{u.ltrrl 1,670.00 Â"ózo12 3t15t2012 3tßrunz ,ï0.fn 54O-æ) 8æ.fn Ar72012 3t15t2012 3i,15t20t2 l.5(¡ (1.s0) 4"3

4ßIm1Z 4t5t2012 2,170.(n Q7O.æl 1,4{n.æ A8

Year St3tement Dàte Tr ar':ction Date Depcsits au_l u\tec AmounlNote

Åcj J\lilr-trr