w2v india - ifat 2015 mumbai: unlocking the potential of swachh bharat mission

Unlocking the potential ofSwachh Bharat Mission

Waste to Value Consortium

MSWM Technologies

Case Study : Incineration

Case Study : Composting

Policy Impact

Indian Focus Solution

Contents

Waste Composition : Indian Vs Western

MSWM Solution Matrix

Waste2Value Consortium

Hanjer plant, Gurgaon

Bio methanisation systems


Consultancy and engineering in a

broad spectrum of waste

management topics

Currency, Service Solutions and

Recycling Solutions

Waste segregation equipment, biogas installations and

electricity generation

Gas Treatment, Gas Conversion and Enclosed Flares

Leachate treatment and

Biogas upgrading

Trisoplast Landfill lining and

Multriwell landfill gas extraction

Engineering of Waste

Management Infrastructural

projects and soil remediation

Private members in the W2V Consortium

• For IAS officers and senior bureaucrats• Master classes in waste2value technology,

policy and management• Certification program ideally to be supported

by Ministry of UD• Nijenrode University to take lead in setting-up

this program• Constitute an Advisory Board with both Dutch

and Indian experts; the Board could counsel the Indian Government in the area of waste management policy design and implementation (MSW 2013 and beyond)

• For stakeholders responsible for waste management in state governments, pollution control boards, municipalities

• Netherlands can provide a comprehensive course

• Make these courses available online. E.g. YouTube lessons

• Localization of content• NSWAI could have a key role in

dissemination/promotion of knowledge modules (could also become an online training program/e-learning). Further discussion needed with Dr. Sahu

Knowledge2Knowledge

Government2Government


Ministry of Infrastructur

e, NL

W2V

MoUD, India

MH HP

MoU

MoU

MoU/FS

Empaneled


W2V signing MoU with MoUD, HP W2V signing MoU with MoUD, Maharashtra in presence of Dutch Prime Minister

W2V delivering session at a National Workshop, Chandigarh

W2V with officials of Karnal Municipality, Haryana


Waste Composition : India vs West

Waste Europe US India

Bio-degradable

Less Less More

Recyclables More More Less

Inerts Less Less More

Moisture Less Less More

MSWM Various Countries

0 1 1 1 1 2 3 3

15

28

4049 49

54 59 59 63 65 67 70 70 7379 79 80 82

88 89 92 9499

5037

5142 38

57 54

34

38

35

2517

124 1

218

18 11 1

11 111

1

51

62

4857 61

41 43

61

4737 35 34

39 40 40

2029

1722

30 28

16 2011

20 1811 12 8 6

1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

trea

tmen

t of M

unic

ipal

Sol

id W

aste

RecyclingIncineration (R1+D10)Landfill

MSWM Technology Comparison

Region Technology Purpose Requirement

Indian Scenario

West

Incineration

Volume Reduction

1000 TPD + Inorganic MSW

60% plus Organic content

Recycling Reuse40-50% recycling materials

Less than 30%

India Composting

Value Creation

Segregated waste

•No segregation at source•Less market value

A case financial case study on why they do not work in India

Incineration


Incineration is Volume Reduction

Country Model Own

er

Support from

Government

Tipping Fee

[INR/t]

Tariff[INR/Unit]

Sustainability

JapanULB ,DBO or PFI

ULB Subsidy Paid by Tax 5.2 ○

China PPP ULB or D

Exemption from Tax 1500 6.5 ○

Sri Lanka PPP D Exemption

from Tax 260 13 ○

India PPP D × 0 3.25 ×

India(proposal)

DBOT or ULB,DBO

ULB Equity or Subsidy 650 13 ○D = Developer, ULB = Urban Local Body, Unit

= kW

Soil Pollution Air Pollution

Incinerating Waste With High Organic and Moisture Content

Incineration is Volume Reduction

Indians Against Incineration

A case financial case study on why they do not work in India

Composting plants


Revenue

Costs

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45CAPEX OPEX VGFTIPPING FEE Compost

MIXED WASTE

COMPOST PLANT

“COMPOST”

Tipping fee is the main revenue

contributor, not compost

MIXED WASTE

COMPOST PLANT

“COMPOST”

Revenue

Costs

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45CAPEX OPEXVGF TIPPING FEEProfitability gap

Tipping fee is the main revenue

contributor, not compost

Problems plaguing composting Underinvestment

(L1) Low re-sale value

for compost Incentive to dump

not process (tipping fee)

Manali plant, HP

Policy Impact

Policy Impact on MSWM

Pay per ton : tipping free vs PPA Incentivizing dumping vs Incentivizing

processing Tipping fee by Municipality vs PPA by State

Collection and Transportation Processing End Product

Tipping Fee PPA

Policy Impact – Hybrid Model

PPATipping

Fees

Quantity of waste Quality of waste

Biogas ElectricityTipping Fee Model

Deciding

FactorPPA Model

Municipality State

Solution for Indian specific waste composition

Indian Focus Solution

Drag picture to placeholder or click icon to add

Hypothetical feasibility curves for techniques

Cost Comparison for Different Technologies

Compost (@Rs. 1500/ton)

Tipping fee (landfill in India) (@Rs. 650/ton)

Waste to bio-energy PPA (@Rs. 8 /kWh) w2e

Incineration TF (Rs. 650) +PPA (Rs. 13)

Tipping fee (West)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

200

650

850

2000

3500

Simplistic overview of solutions

Segregation at source

Mechanical segregation

Waste to energy

Low land requirement

✔ ✔ ✔

Below < 300 TPD 300-1,000 TPD > 1000 TPD

Waste Management Solution Matrix

Thane Kalyan Dombivil Satara. Lonawala. Ahmednagar. Aurungabad Amravati. Malegaon. Degloor. Akola Nagpur Ballarpur.

A knowledge tool kit that will enable the Government of Maharashtra to map solutions for their waste management issues

Comprehensive data will be collected from the select 12 cities

Solutions will be proposed based on the data gathered and analyzed

w2v india - ifat 2015 mumbai: unlocking the potential of swachh bharat mission

Environment