vtem in ghana for gold exploration
DESCRIPTION
Using VTEM for gold exploration in Ghana.TRANSCRIPT
© Condor Consulting 2010
VTEM over BogosoSept, 2007
GEOTECH’S
VersitileTransientElecrtro-Magnetic
System
A Case Study of Four VTEM Surveys for
Gold Exploration in Ghana
© Condor Consulting 2006
EM Processing Techniques
Layered-Earth (1D)
Inversion
1. Data collected as transient decay voltage.
2. Perform LEI on each decay.
3. Display LEIs as model cross-section.
4. Depth slices can be extracted for conductivity or conductance.
Transient Decays
Voltages as profiles
© Condor Consulting 2010
1
2
3 Model from LEI
Magnetic data
Distance along flight line
© Condor Consulting 2010
The Four Ghana Surveys
Bogoso Golden Star Resources Ltd. Flown in 2007 100 m line spacing
Obuasi Pelangio Exploration Inc. Flown in 2007 and 2009 100 m line spacing
Esaase Keegan Resources Inc. Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
Asumura Keegan Resources Inc. Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
The surveys lie within the West African Craton
The major proterozoic units:•Birimian: metasediments and metavolcanics (greenstones)•Tarkwaian: metasediments – usu. barren
© Condor Consulting 2010
General EM Character
of the four areas
5 km
4 km
4 km
2 km
dB/dt Z Component
Channel 15 (1130 usec)
(a mid-time channel)
1) Bogoso
2) Obuasi
4) Asumura
3) Esaase
•All flown in northwest direction.•All show large northeast structures that contain graphite.•These are thrust faults that have been repeatedly reactivated.•For each area the gold has a different relationship to the graphite.
Next slide shows cross-section through the Chujah Pit.
Not all conductors have gold.
The wide conductors along the MCZ are favorable to the where known gold is located.
Gold occurs along the Main Crush Zone – conductive.
The resistive Tarkwaian is to the east, Birimian to the west.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Bogoso/Prestea - Structures
Conductivity from
layered-earth inversion
216 m depth slice
Town of Bogoso
Prestea
Chujah Pit
© Condor Consulting 2010
Power line
Ore Power line
Chujah Pit
Line through Chujah Main Pit
EM channels
Magnetic data (RTP)
LEI section
Plan map
Not a distinctive TMI anomaly
MCZ
Cultural1st VD anomaly
© Condor Consulting 2010
Vertical Gradient of Magnetic Data
Geology from Allibone 2002.
Bogoso/Prestea area.Known ore is near Birimian- Tarkwaian contact
Tarkwaian has larger magnetic anomalies due to volcanic content
No apparent magnetic anomaly with known ore
Magnetic highs/lows are not good indicators of known ore
© Condor Consulting 2010
Town of Bogoso
Tilt Angle of Magnetic Data
Can use magnetic data to find non-conductive structures.
East-West magnetic disruptions are visible may be relevant to gold placement.
These are due to D4 and D5 structures that cross the large D2 faults.
Town of Bogoso
Prestea
© Condor Consulting 2010
EM dB/dt channel 15
Zoomed to
Bogoso/Prestea area.
There is a strong correlation of known deposits with conductivity.
Magnetic disruptions appear related to some conductivity highs and known gold occurrences.
Town of Bogoso
Cultural Contamination
Main Chujah Pit
© Condor Consulting 2010
Conductance for 50 m to 200 m Depth Interval
55 Target Zones of various rankings are identified using a variety of known criteria such as:
Conductivity,
Ground geophysics,
Mapped lithology,
Mapped and interpreted faults,
Flexures,
Soil geochemistry,
Drilling.
Most targets are along large conductors as seen with the known gold.
Target Zones 19 & 40 are ranked high priority and shown on next slide.
Town of Bogoso
Target Zone 40
5 km
Target Zone 19
Magnetic high is
due to a dyke.
Line 9330 B-19
B-19:
Very wide conductor on the MCZ.
Right-hand flexure in the fault here.
A north-northwest dyke run through this target.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Line 6870
B-40
B-40
Sharp conductor with high time constant on the MCZ.
May have some right-hand flexure in the fault.
Target Zone B-40
5 km
Target Zone B-19
Both of these Target Zones are further north in the survey block, away from the known gold locations.
Discrete feature picks are marked by vertical lines.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Primary Targeting Criteria
Bogoso/Prestea
1. Large conductors in 50 to 200 m DI.
2. Conductors identified through high ranking discrete feature picks.
3. Cross cutting structures
58 Targets Identified.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Four Ghana Surveys
Bogoso Golden Star Resources Ltd. Flown in 2007 100 m line spacing
Obuasi Pelangio Exploration Inc. Flown in 2007 and 2009 100 m line spacing
Esaase Keegan Resources Inc.
Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
Asumura Keegan Resources Inc.
Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
© Condor Consulting 2010
Conductance from Layered Earth Inversion
50 m to 200 m Depth Interval
Color pallet is linear, 0 to 5000 millisiemens
Mines
Gold Mineralization
Granodiorite
Obuasi – Correlation of Known Gold with Conductivity•Good correlation of gold and conductivity, particularly south in Obuasi Mine area.•However, plenty of gold showings without significant conductivity.•Not all lie on a major fault.
Obuasi
Cross-section
P.L.
1 km
LEI conductivity
VTEM time channels
© Condor Consulting 2010
Obuasi Cross-Cutting StructuresNortheast to east-west structures visible in magnetic data.
Some correlation of gold to magnetic highs.
Magnetic Tilt Angle
Mines
Gold Mineralization
Granodiorite
Obuasi
Tikal Section
TK03
TK01
100 m
300 m
•Two holes drilled on flank of EM conductor.•Encountered Sulphidation and Silicification.•Clearly some mineralization is resistive.
© Condor Consulting 2010
N S
Silicification
© Condor Consulting 2010
Obuasi Target Zones
TZ-12
Line 1720
50 m to 200 m conductanceColor pallet is linear, 0 to 5000 millisiemens
Northern end of Obuasi Mine
High conductivity and large structures not as important as at Bogoso.
Most target zones are conductors, such as TZ-12.
Some target zones are resistors.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Primary Targeting Criteria
Bogoso/Prestea
1. Large conductors in 50 to 200 m DI.
2. Conductors identified through high ranking discrete feature picks.
3. Cross cutting structures
58 Targets Identified.
Obuasi
1. Conductors in 50 to 200 m DI
2. Cross cutting structures
3. Resistive areas
4. Magnetic highs
51 Targets Identified
© Condor Consulting 2010
Four Ghana Surveys
Bogoso Golden Star Resources Ltd. Flown in 2007 100 m line spacing
Obuasi Pelangio Exploration Inc.
Flown in 2007 and 2009 100 m line spacing
Esaase Keegan Resources Inc.
Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
Asumura Keegan Resources Inc.
Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
© Condor Consulting 2010
EM Channel 15
Esaase EM Data
Resource Area
Magnetic Dikes
Multi-million oz. resource area is not conductive.
Gold is in quartz veins along major fault.
Gold is in close proximity to conductors.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Esaase Crossing Structures
Magnetic Tilt Angle
Some crossing structures are visible.
As with Bogoso and Obuasi, these seem relevant to the mineralization.
© Condor Consulting 2010
TZ-25
Line 3300
Esaase EM profiles
Line 3610
RTP-TMI
Power line monitor
Time Constant
Mag
vert gradMag total grad
30 m conductivity depth slice
showing shallow resistors.
Big west dipping structure
Only mildly conductive
Tarkwaian
Many target zones are resistors.
Conductors still targeted, just in case there is another mineralization style present.
TZ-20
Resource
© Condor Consulting 2010
Primary Targeting Criteria
Bogoso/Prestea
1. Large conductors in 50 to 200 m DI.
2. Conductors identified through high ranking discrete feature picks.
3. Cross cutting structures
58 Targets Identified.
Esaase
1. Cross cutting structures
2. Shallow resistive areas
3. Deeper Conductors
28 Targets Identified
Obuasi
1. Conductors in 50 to 200 m DI
2. Cross cutting structures
3. Resistive areas
4. Magnetic highs
51 Targets Identified
© Condor Consulting 2010
Four Ghana Surveys
Bogoso Golden Star Resources Ltd. Flown in 2007 100 m line spacing
Obuasi Pelangio Exploration Inc.
Flown in 2007 and 2009 100 m line spacing
Esaase Keegan Resources Inc.
Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
Asumura Keegan Resources Inc. Flown in 2007 200 m line spacing
© Condor Consulting 2010
Asumura Conductivity
92 m conductivity
depth slice
No significant gold mineralization found associated with the graphitic faults.
Gold is found along the NW Fault - which does not contain graphite.
© Condor Consulting 2010
Asumura magnetic tilt angle with crossing structures
Some disruption around known gold, but not distinctive.
Line 1450
© Condor Consulting 2010
Asumura EM profiles for Target Zone TZ-36
Line 1710
TZ-36
Weak surface conductor at known gold.
Resistors at 92 m provided some targets.
Conductivity at 92 m depth
© Condor Consulting 2010
Primary Targeting Criteria
Bogoso/Prestea
1. Large conductors in 50 to 200 m DI.
2. Conductors identified through high ranking discrete feature picks.
3. Cross cutting structures
58 Targets Identified.
Asumura
1. Near large faults
2. Resistive areas
3. Crossing structures
4. Possible deep conductors
50 Targets Identified
Obuasi
1. Conductors in 50 to 200 m DI
2. Cross cutting structures
3. Resistive areas
4. Magnetic highs
51 Targets Identified
Esaase
1. Cross cutting structures
2. Shallow resistive areas
3. Deeper Conductors
28 Targets Identified
© Condor Consulting 2010
Conclusions
© Condor Consulting 2010
Acknowledgements
Condor Consulting thanks the following companies for allowing their data to be used in this study:
•Golden Star Resources Ltd.
•Pelangio Exploration Inc.
•Keegan Resources Inc.