voluntary and involuntary admissions on a general hospital psychiatric unit

1
BioMed Central Page 1 of 1 (page number not for citation purposes) Annals of General Hospital Psychiatry Open Access Poster presentation Voluntary and involuntary admissions on a general hospital psychiatric unit C Christodoulou*, K Syraki, T Mylonaki, A Liossi and K Alexandropoulos Address: Psychiatric Unit, General Hospital of Athens,"G. Gennimatas", Greece * Corresponding author Background At emergency psychiatric units the rapid assessment and solution is very important, especially for the cases which exhibit life-threatening behavior or ideation. The decision whether or not to admit a psychiatric patient at risk for involuntary hospitalization is important. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical differences and similarities as well as the social and demographic characteristics, between the involuntary psychiatric patients and the voluntary group in order to better under- stand and deal with the clinical and administrative issues involved. Material and Methods All 40 involuntary psychiatric patients who were admitted to General Hospital of Athens Psychiatric Unit, during a six months period, were compared to another 40 volun- tary psychiatric patients, who had been admitted in the same period. The interviews were performed by three of us (C.C, K.S, T.M) and included social, demographic, and psychopathological data, as well as the Crisis Triage Rat- ing Scale (C.T.R.S, Bengelsdorf et al., 1984). This scale per- mits the assignment of a numerical score from 1 to 5 on each of three dimensions:A) Dangerousness (1 = most dangerous to self or others, 5 = least), B) Support System (1 = poor or absent, 5 = excellent), C) Motivation and ability to cooperate (1 = least, 5 = most). The score of the scale ranged between 3 (more severe) and 15. Results There are no differences regarding age and sex or other social and demographic characteristics between the two groups. Also there are no significant differences in respect to the diagnosis, except of affective disorders, where patients with Mania predominate to those with Depres- sion in the involuntary psychiatric patients (p < 0.001). Less psychiatric patients with involuntary admission were under medication (p < 0.001). The total mean score in the C.T.R.S. is more severe for involuntary patients' group (6.85 ± 2.23) than the other (9.55 ± 1.50, p < 0.001). This due to the absence of support system, for the involuntary group (2.55 ± 1.21 to 3.74 ± 1.16, p < 0.001) and the lack of motivation or inability to cooperate in the same group (1.72 ± 0.93 to 2.66 ± 1.20, p < 0.001) rather, than to the dangerousness (2.57 ± 1.63 to 3.14 ± 1.56). Sixteen (16) involuntary patients (40%), and 24 voluntary patients (60%) have total score between 8 and 10. Discussion The main reasons for the admissions on psychiatric department is the absence of support system, the lack of motivation and the inability for cooperation. These two factors determine, in association with the dangerousness, the way of admission (involuntary or voluntary) in a large proportion of patients. It seems that there is a significant overlap between these two ways of admissions. The growth of support systems through either community psy- chiatry or primary care units of Psychiatric Hospitals or General Hospitals expected to reduce the admissions. from International Society on Brain and Behaviour: 1st International Congress on Brain and Behaviour Hyatt Regency Hotel, Thessaloniki, Greece, 20–23 November, 2003 Published: 23 December 2003 Annals of General Hospital Psychiatry 2003, 2(Suppl 1):S120 Received: 1 November 2003 <supplement> <title> <p>International Society on Brain and Behaviour: 1st International Congress on Brain and Behaviour</p> </title> <note>Meeting abstracts</note> </supplement> This article is available from: http://www.general-hospital-psychiatry.com/content/2/S1/S120

Upload: c-christodoulou

Post on 06-Jul-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Voluntary and involuntary admissions on a general hospital psychiatric unit

BioMed Central

Page 1 of 1(page number not for citation purposes)

Annals of General Hospital Psychiatry

Open AccessPoster presentationVoluntary and involuntary admissions on a general hospital psychiatric unitC Christodoulou*, K Syraki, T Mylonaki, A Liossi and K Alexandropoulos

Address: Psychiatric Unit, General Hospital of Athens,"G. Gennimatas", Greece

* Corresponding author

BackgroundAt emergency psychiatric units the rapid assessment andsolution is very important, especially for the cases whichexhibit life-threatening behavior or ideation. The decisionwhether or not to admit a psychiatric patient at risk forinvoluntary hospitalization is important.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical differencesand similarities as well as the social and demographiccharacteristics, between the involuntary psychiatricpatients and the voluntary group in order to better under-stand and deal with the clinical and administrative issuesinvolved.

Material and MethodsAll 40 involuntary psychiatric patients who were admittedto General Hospital of Athens Psychiatric Unit, during asix months period, were compared to another 40 volun-tary psychiatric patients, who had been admitted in thesame period. The interviews were performed by three of us(C.C, K.S, T.M) and included social, demographic, andpsychopathological data, as well as the Crisis Triage Rat-ing Scale (C.T.R.S, Bengelsdorf et al., 1984). This scale per-mits the assignment of a numerical score from 1 to 5 oneach of three dimensions:A) Dangerousness (1 = mostdangerous to self or others, 5 = least), B) Support System(1 = poor or absent, 5 = excellent), C) Motivation andability to cooperate (1 = least, 5 = most). The score of thescale ranged between 3 (more severe) and 15.

ResultsThere are no differences regarding age and sex or othersocial and demographic characteristics between the twogroups. Also there are no significant differences in respect

to the diagnosis, except of affective disorders, wherepatients with Mania predominate to those with Depres-sion in the involuntary psychiatric patients (p < 0.001).Less psychiatric patients with involuntary admission wereunder medication (p < 0.001). The total mean score in theC.T.R.S. is more severe for involuntary patients' group(6.85 ± 2.23) than the other (9.55 ± 1.50, p < 0.001). Thisdue to the absence of support system, for the involuntarygroup (2.55 ± 1.21 to 3.74 ± 1.16, p < 0.001) and the lackof motivation or inability to cooperate in the same group(1.72 ± 0.93 to 2.66 ± 1.20, p < 0.001) rather, than to thedangerousness (2.57 ± 1.63 to 3.14 ± 1.56). Sixteen (16)involuntary patients (40%), and 24 voluntary patients(60%) have total score between 8 and 10.

DiscussionThe main reasons for the admissions on psychiatricdepartment is the absence of support system, the lack ofmotivation and the inability for cooperation. These twofactors determine, in association with the dangerousness,the way of admission (involuntary or voluntary) in a largeproportion of patients. It seems that there is a significantoverlap between these two ways of admissions. Thegrowth of support systems through either community psy-chiatry or primary care units of Psychiatric Hospitals orGeneral Hospitals expected to reduce the admissions.

from International Society on Brain and Behaviour: 1st International Congress on Brain and BehaviourHyatt Regency Hotel, Thessaloniki, Greece, 20–23 November, 2003

Published: 23 December 2003

Annals of General Hospital Psychiatry 2003, 2(Suppl 1):S120

Received: 1 November 2003<supplement> <title> <p>International Society on Brain and Behaviour: 1st International Congress on Brain and Behaviour</p> </title> <note>Meeting abstracts</note> </supplement>

This article is available from: http://www.general-hospital-psychiatry.com/content/2/S1/S120