visualizations: the nature book of art and science

1
Visualizations: The Nature Book of Art and Science by Martin Kemp Oxford University Press, 2000. £20.00 hardback (202 pages) ISBN 0 19 856476 7 In 1612, Galileo’s colleague Cassiano dal Pozzo (1588–1657) decided to abandon his successful legal career and pursue his intel- lectual interests. Diplomatically negotiating Roman patronage networks, he managed to secure enough official positions to enable him to travel throughout Europe, entertain cultured guests, and build up an extensive collection of paintings, books and medals. Internationally renowned for his expertise both in antiquities and in natural history, Cassiano gradually conceived an extra- ordinarily ambitious project – to construct a Museo Cartaceo, or Paper Museum. This Museum would consist of drawings and prints covering diverse fields of learning, so that the remains of classical civilisations would be gathered – metaphorically speaking – under the same roof as ancient geological specimens, together with living plants and animals from all over the known world. After Cassiano’s death, the collection was dispersed. Some of it was lost in a shipwreck, but as family fortunes crumbled, other parts were sold off to greedy collectors like the chemist John Dalton, who wrote home from Bologna: ‘One fine collection of Drawings belonging to an Old Curate must let alone, for the old fool asks such an exorbitant price that there is no making even an offer…A little time, as he is very infirm, must bring him to the grave, which if it happens in my time, shall watch the opportunity when his heirs will and must sell them’ 1 . As he built up his enormous collection, Cassiano made it accessible to visiting scholars, but never realised his intention of publishing the multiple volumes of draw- ings. These were to provide a transportable compendium of material curiosities, which were still undivided into those two appar- ently mutually exclusive modern categories, science and art. Browsing through Martin Kemp’s most recent publication, Visualizations: The Nature Book of Art and Science, recreates the pre-disciplinary experience of perusing Cassiano’s Paper Museum. One of Britain’s leading art historians, Kemp is famous for his pioneering studies that explore the relationships between art and science not by regarding them as two distinct cultures that influence one another, but by examining how they emerged and separated from shared origins. This latest book, which includes many excellent colour prints and line drawings, reproduces over 75 articles drawn from Kemp’s successful series in Nature; these are sandwiched between a specially written, if brief, introduction and conclusion. Each double page spread focuses on a particular picture, event or concept, and bears a snappy alliterative title: Lisa’s Laws, Vesalius’ Veracity, Wright’s Ruptions, Feynman’s Figurations. Drawn from very disparate sources, Kemp’s carefully se- lected illustrations visually defy easy classification: like the sketches of Leonardo da Vinci, the best known exemplar of how science and art may be fused together, these pictures refuse to be slotted into a narrow category. For instance, although sophisti- cated electronic equipment is needed to gen- erate NASA images of Jupiter and Venus, Kemp maintains that these planetary land- scapes not only resemble the paintings of J.M.W. Turner, but also that the people syn- thesising the electronic scans share and have articulated Turner’s Romantic awe when con- fronted with the infinite cosmos. Arguing in the other direction, Kemp presents Jan Vermeer as an experimenter who used his canvas to explore how our perceptual systems can be deceived, and who achieved superb optical consistency in his interior paintings by converting a room into a camera obscura (Kemp does not mention that this interpret- ation is contested by Vermeer specialists). As the field of theoretical museum studies has blossomed during the past twenty years, scholars have become increasingly inter- ested in comparing museums with various other cultural forms, including cathedrals, hospitals and books. John Locke described memory as ‘the Storehouse of our Ideas’, and reciprocally, museums have become the built repositories of our collective memory. Cassiano’s goal was to preserve faithful records of these material artefacts, these tangible memories of the earth’s physical and human history, within the covers of his giant tomes. As well as recalling Cassiano’s project, Kemp’s book resembles a museum in other ways. He has marshalled his articles into six separate sections but, like the rooms of an art gallery, there seems to be no strong ordering principle, so that the reader–visitor is free to wander from one to the other, to become absorbed in one picture yet neglect its neighbour. Furthermore, each of Kemp’s pieces is self-contained, so that his written text accompanying each picture effectively functions like the substantial captions that some curators now include in their exhibitions. Yet however beautifully a book is produced, it can never replicate the museum experience of standing in front of a real canvas, biological specimen or art object. Reproductions fail to convey the impact of size, or the almost tactile impression yielded by particular surfaces or decorative techniques. On the other hand, one great advantage of books with a continuous structure is that they enable authors to present systematic cases supporting their point of view. In his introduction, Kemp argues that all human beings share ‘deep structures of intuition’ that frame their visual understanding; both through their genes and their experiences, scientists and artists hold in common the ways in which they visually try to make sense of their environment, and also the pleasure they gain in representing it artificially. This is a far-reaching proposition, but one which is illustrated rather than rigorously demon- strated in this museum-like format. Kemp’s individual essays are written with great skill, and he explains complex sci- entific and artistic concepts with equal facility. With its beautiful illustrations, this is a delightful book to dip into, and will no doubt be received with joy at many Christmases to come. Reference 1 Haskell, F. and McBurney, H. (1996) Introduction. In The Paper Museum of Cassiano dal Pozzo, Series A, Part 2, Volume 1 (Haskell, F. and Montagu, J., eds), pp. 8–26, Harvey Miller (quotation p. 17) Patricia Fara Endeavour Vol. 25(1) 2001 39

Upload: patricia-fara

Post on 16-Sep-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Visualizations: The Nature Book of Art and Science

Visualizations: The Nature Book

of Art and Science

by Martin KempOxford University Press, 2000.£20.00 hardback (202 pages)ISBN 0 19 856476 7

In 1612, Galileo’s colleague Cassiano dalPozzo (1588–1657) decided to abandon hissuccessful legal career and pursue his intel-lectual interests. Diplomatically negotiatingRoman patronage networks, he managed tosecure enough official positions to enablehim to travel throughout Europe, entertaincultured guests, and build up an extensivecollection of paintings, books and medals.Internationally renowned for his expertiseboth in antiquities and in natural history,Cassiano gradually conceived an extra-ordinarily ambitious project – to construct aMuseo Cartaceo, or Paper Museum. ThisMuseum would consist of drawings andprints covering diverse fields of learning, sothat the remains of classical civilisationswould be gathered – metaphorically speaking– under the same roof as ancient geologicalspecimens, together with living plants andanimals from all over the known world.

After Cassiano’s death, the collection wasdispersed. Some of it was lost in ashipwreck, but as family fortunes crumbled,other parts were sold off to greedycollectors like the chemist John Dalton, whowrote home from Bologna: ‘One finecollection of Drawings belonging to an OldCurate must let alone, for the old fool askssuch an exorbitant price that there is nomaking even an offer…A little time, as he isvery infirm, must bring him to the grave,which if it happens in my time, shall watchthe opportunity when his heirs will andmust sell them’1.

As he built up his enormous collection,Cassiano made it accessible to visitingscholars, but never realised his intention ofpublishing the multiple volumes of draw-ings. These were to provide a transportablecompendium of material curiosities, whichwere still undivided into those two appar-ently mutually exclusive modern categories,science and art. Browsing through MartinKemp’s most recent publication,Visualizations: The Nature Book of Art andScience, recreates the pre-disciplinaryexperience of perusing Cassiano’s PaperMuseum. One of Britain’s leading arthistorians, Kemp is famous for hispioneering studies that explore therelationships between art and science not byregarding them as two distinct cultures thatinfluence one another, but by examininghow they emerged and separated fromshared origins. This latest book, whichincludes many excellent colour prints andline drawings, reproduces over 75 articlesdrawn from Kemp’s successful series inNature; these are sandwiched between aspecially written, if brief, introduction andconclusion.

Each double page spread focuses on a particular picture, event or concept, andbears a snappy alliterative title: Lisa’s Laws,Vesalius’ Veracity, Wright’s Ruptions,Feynman’s Figurations. Drawn from verydisparate sources, Kemp’s carefully se-lected illustrations visually defy easyclassification: like the sketches of Leonardoda Vinci, the best known exemplar of howscience and art may be fused together, thesepictures refuse to be slotted into a narrowcategory. For instance, although sophisti-cated electronic equipment is needed to gen-erate NASA images of Jupiter and Venus,Kemp maintains that these planetary land-scapes not only resemble the paintings ofJ.M.W. Turner, but also that the people syn-thesising the electronic scans share and havearticulated Turner’s Romantic awe when con-fronted with the infinite cosmos. Arguing inthe other direction, Kemp presents JanVermeer as an experimenter who used hiscanvas to explore how our perceptual systemscan be deceived, and who achieved superboptical consistency in his interior paintingsby converting a room into a camera obscura(Kemp does not mention that this interpret-ation is contested by Vermeer specialists).

As the field of theoretical museum studieshas blossomed during the past twenty years,scholars have become increasingly inter-ested in comparing museums with variousother cultural forms, including cathedrals,

hospitals and books. John Locke describedmemory as ‘the Storehouse of our Ideas’,and reciprocally, museums have become thebuilt repositories of our collective memory.Cassiano’s goal was to preserve faithfulrecords of these material artefacts, thesetangible memories of the earth’s physicaland human history, within the covers of hisgiant tomes. As well as recalling Cassiano’sproject, Kemp’s book resembles a museumin other ways. He has marshalled his articlesinto six separate sections but, like the roomsof an art gallery, there seems to be no strongordering principle, so that the reader–visitoris free to wander from one to the other, to become absorbed in one picture yetneglect its neighbour. Furthermore, each of Kemp’s pieces is self-contained, so thathis written text accompanying each pictureeffectively functions like the substantialcaptions that some curators now include intheir exhibitions.

Yet however beautifully a book isproduced, it can never replicate the museumexperience of standing in front of a realcanvas, biological specimen or art object.Reproductions fail to convey the impact of size, or the almost tactile impressionyielded by particular surfaces or decorativetechniques. On the other hand, one great advantage of books with a continuousstructure is that they enable authors topresent systematic cases supporting theirpoint of view. In his introduction, Kempargues that all human beings share ‘deepstructures of intuition’ that frame theirvisual understanding; both through theirgenes and their experiences, scientists andartists hold in common the ways in whichthey visually try to make sense of theirenvironment, and also the pleasure theygain in representing it artificially. This is afar-reaching proposition, but one which isillustrated rather than rigorously demon-strated in this museum-like format.

Kemp’s individual essays are written withgreat skill, and he explains complex sci-entific and artistic concepts with equalfacility. With its beautiful illustrations, thisis a delightful book to dip into, and will no doubt be received with joy at manyChristmases to come.

Reference1 Haskell, F. and McBurney, H. (1996)

Introduction. In The Paper Museum ofCassiano dal Pozzo, Series A, Part 2, Volume 1 (Haskell, F. and Montagu, J., eds),pp. 8–26, Harvey Miller (quotation p. 17)

Patricia Fara

Endeavour Vol. 25(1) 2001 39