very large hadron collider

Upload: dimchodimov

Post on 14-Apr-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    1/142

    Appendix DTBM Tunnel Assumptions and Cost Estimating Output

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    2/142

    Appendix D TBM Tunnel Assumptions and Cost Estimating Output

    Discussion:

    The tunnel costs were estimated using TBM cost estimating software and cost database

    developed by Hatch Mott MacDonald. Appendix D contains output from the software for eachTBM type and tunnel diameter. Please note the following about the output:

    1. Rock Types are called TBM Types in the main body of the report.

    2. Rock Type A/B is called TBM Type B in the main body of the report.

    3. The costs for concrete inverts were not included in the output in the appendices.

    These were added in the CNA cost estimating spreadsheet. The inverts are needed toprovide a flat working surface. Inverts were added to TBM Types A and C only becauseit was assumed that the TBM Type B cast-in-place liner could be formed with a flat

    bottom.

    4. The costs of grouting for water control were not included in the appendices. These

    were added in the CNA cost estimating spreadsheet. Grouting was added to TBM TypesA and B only. TBM Type C is a sealed system that does not allow water to enter the

    tunnel so grouting is not required.

    List of Abbreviations:

    CIP Cast-in-place

    H Hour

    m2 Square meters of tunnel face

    Nr Number (equivalent to Each)

    W Week

    mW per meter per week

    kWh Kilowatt hour

    l Liter

    m Meter

    m3 Cubic meter

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    3/142

    Page 1 of 2

    s:\fermi_vlhc\pm\ reports\hmm assumptions.doc TEXT-P.DOT, 00/01v

    Fermilab Tunnels

    Cost Estimates

    Assumptions

    General

    The following assumptions apply to all tunnel drives:

    4800 metres of tunnel from shaft to shaft

    2 ten hours shifts undertaken daily, 5 days per week

    Tunnels excavated using 3.66 metre or 4.88 metre finished diameter rock TBM

    75 percent of TBM cost written off in first drive, 15 percent in second drive, 10 percent inthird drive, and 0 percent in fourth and fifth drives

    Labour rates based on Minneapolis Project for Year 2001. (Similar to Illinois)

    Specific

    Assumptions used for 3.66m (12ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type A as follows:

    No areas of difficult excavation

    A total of 400 3 metre long rockbolts installed sporadically in the tunnel crown in jointed

    or potentially weak zones

    Average tunnel advance rate of 225 metres per week

    No secondary lining required

    Assumptions used for 3.66m (12ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type A/B (requiring CIP liner) asfollows:

    No areas of difficult excavation

    Three rockbolts, 3 metres in length, installed in each 6 metre length of tunnel

    Average tunnel advance rate of 211 metres per week

    Secondary cast-in-place concrete lining installed to prevent long term degradation of therock

    Assumptions used for 3.66m (12ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type C as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 20 percent,

    over 20 percent of the tunnel length

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    4/142

    Page 2 of 2

    s:\fermi_vlhc\pm\ reports\hmm assumptions.doc TEXT-P.DOT, 00/01v

    No primary support provided with a 200mm thick segmental concrete lining installedimmediately behind the TBM following each excavation cycle

    Average tunnel advance rate of 102 metres per week

    Assumptions used for 4.88m (16ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type A as follows:

    No areas of difficult excavation

    A total of 400 3 metre long rockbolts installed sporadically in the tunnel crown in jointedor potentially weak zones

    Average tunnel advance rate of 225 metres per week

    No secondary lining required

    Assumptions used for 4.88m (16ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type A/B (requiring CIP liner) asfollows:

    No areas of difficult excavation

    Three rockbolts, 3 metres in length, installed in each 4.5 metre length of tunnel

    Average tunnel advance rate of 195 metres per week

    Secondary cast-in-place concrete lining installed to prevent long term degradation of the

    rock

    Assumptions used for 4.88m (16ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type C as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 20 percent,over 20 percent of the tunnel length

    No primary support provided with a 225mm thick segmental concrete lining installedimmediately behind the TBM following each excavation cycle

    Average tunnel advance rate of 102 metres per week

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    5/142

    Fermilab Tunnels

    Estimate Summary

    12 ft dia tunnel (3.66 m)

    Rock Type Tunnel Drive Tunnel Length Drive Cost TBM setup Total

    (m)

    A First 4800 8,160,000 400,000 8,560,000

    A Second 4800 6,070,000 200,000 6,270,000

    A Third 4800 5,910,000 200,000 6,110,000

    A Fourth 4800 5,600,000 200,000 5,800,000

    A Fifth 4800 5,600,000 200,000 5,800,000

    A/B with CIP First 4800 18,930,000 400,000 19,330,000

    A/B with CIP Second 4800 16,350,000 200,000 16,550,000

    A/B with CIP Third 4800 16,140,000 200,000 16,340,000

    A/B with CIP Fourth 4800 15,710,000 200,000 15,910,000A/B with CIP Fifth 4800 15,710,000 200,000 15,910,000

    C First 4800 26,630,000 400,000 27,030,000

    C Second 4800 23,190,000 200,000 23,390,000

    C Third 4800 22,940,000 200,000 23,140,000

    C Fourth 4800 22,430,000 200,000 22,630,000

    C Fifth 4800 22,430,000 200,000 22,630,000

    16 ft dia tunnel (4.88 m)

    Rock Type Tunnel Drive Tunnel Length Drive Cost TBM setup Total

    (m)

    A First 4800 10,930,000 400,000 11,330,000

    A Second 4800 7,360,000 200,000 7,560,000

    A Third 4800 7,080,000 200,000 7,280,000

    A Fourth 4800 6,520,000 200,000 6,720,000

    A Fifth 4800 6,520,000 200,000 6,720,000

    A/B with CIP First 4800 24,410,000 400,000 24,810,000

    A/B with CIP Second 4800 20,160,000 200,000 20,360,000

    A/B with CIP Third 4800 19,810,000 200,000 20,010,000

    A/B with CIP Fourth 4800 19,100,000 200,000 19,300,000

    A/B with CIP Fifth 4800 19,100,000 200,000 19,300,000

    C First 4800 33,360,000 400,000 33,760,000

    C Second 4800 27,830,000 200,000 28,030,000

    C Third 4800 27,400,000 200,000 27,600,000

    C Fourth 4800 26,550,000 200,000 26,750,000

    C Fifth 4800 26,550,000 200,000 26,750,000

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    6/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    7/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    8/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    9/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    10/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    11/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    12/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    13/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    14/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    15/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    16/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    17/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    18/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    19/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    20/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    21/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    22/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    23/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    24/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    25/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    26/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    27/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    28/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    29/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    30/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    31/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    32/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    33/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    34/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    35/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    36/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    37/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    38/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    39/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    40/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    41/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    42/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    43/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    44/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    45/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    46/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    47/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    48/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    49/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    50/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    51/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    52/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    53/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    54/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    55/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    56/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    57/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    58/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    59/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    60/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    61/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    62/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    63/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    64/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    65/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    66/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    67/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    68/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    69/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    70/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    71/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    72/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    73/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    74/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    75/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    76/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    77/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    78/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    79/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    80/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    81/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    82/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    83/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    84/142

    Appendix ETBM Tunnel Assumptions and Cost Estimating Output (Not

    Used)

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    85/142

    Appendix E TBM Tunnel Assumptions and Cost Estimating Output (NotUsed)

    Discussion:

    The tunnel costs were estimated using TBM cost estimating software and cost databasedeveloped by Hatch Mott MacDonald. Appendix E contains output from the software for TBM

    types and tunnel diameters not used in the final estimate, but is included here forcompleteness. Please note the following about the output:

    1. Rock Types are called TBM Types in the main body of the report.

    2. Appendix E contains Rock Types B and B+, which are not used in the final estimate.

    List of Abbreviations:

    CIP Cast-in-place

    H Hour

    m2 Square meters of tunnel face

    Nr Number (equivalent to Each)

    W Week

    mW per meter per week

    kWh Kilowatt hour

    l Liter

    m Meterm3 Cubic meter

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    86/142

    Page 1 of 2

    s:\fermi_vlhc\pm\ reports\hmm assumptions (not used).doc TEXT-P.DOT, 00/01v

    Fermilab Tunnels

    Cost Estimates

    Assumptions

    General

    The following assumptions apply to all tunnel drives:

    4800 metres of tunnel from shaft to shaft

    2 ten hours shifts undertaken daily, 5 days per week

    Tunnels excavated using 3.66 metre or 4.88 metre finished diameter rock TBM

    75 percent of TBM cost written off in first drive, 15 percent in second drive, 10 percent inthird drive, and 0 percent in fourth and fifth drives

    Labour rates based on Minneapolis Project for Year 2001. (Similar to Illinois)

    Specific

    Assumptions used for 3.66m (12ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type B as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 35 percent,

    over 20 percent of the tunnel length

    Tunnel support consists of 3 metre long rockbolts with steel straps, installed in sets of 3in the tunnel crown, with each set spaced at 3 metre centres. Additional support in theform of 2 sq.m. of timber laggings per metre of tunnel and associated ribs over 50percent of the tunnel length.

    Average tunnel advance rate of 122 metres per week

    No secondary lining required

    Assumptions used for 3.66m (12ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type B+ as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 35 percent,

    over 20 percent of the tunnel length

    Tunnel support consists of 3 metre long rockbolts with steel straps, installed in sets of 3in the tunnel crown, with each set spaced at 3 metre centres. Additional support in theform of 2 sq.m. of timber laggings per metre of tunnel and associated ribs over 50percent of the tunnel length.

    Average tunnel advance rate of 122 metres per week

    300mm thick concrete secondary lining installed on completion of tunnel boring

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    87/142

    Page 2 of 2

    s:\fermi_vlhc\pm\ reports\hmm assumptions (not used).doc TEXT-P.DOT, 00/01v

    Average lining installation rate of 225 metres per week

    Assumptions used for 4.88m (16ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type B as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 40 percent,over 20 percent of the tunnel length

    Tunnel support consists of 3 metre long rockbolts with steel straps, installed in sets of 3in the tunnel crown, with each set spaced at 3 metre centres. Additional support in theform of 3 sq.m. of timber laggings per metre of tunnel and associated ribs over 50percent of the tunnel length.

    Average tunnel advance rate of 114 metres per week

    No secondary lining required

    Assumptions used for 4.88m (16ft) diameter tunnel in Rock Type B+ as follows:

    Areas of difficult excavation encountered, slowing normal advance rate by 40 percent,over 20 percent of the tunnel length

    Tunnel support consists of 3 metre long rockbolts with steel straps, installed in sets of 3

    in the tunnel crown, with each set spaced at 3 metre centres. Additional support in theform of 3 sq.m. of timber laggings per metre of tunnel and associated ribs over 50percent of the tunnel length.

    Average tunnel advance rate of 114 metres per week

    300mm thick concrete secondary lining installed on completion of tunnel boring

    Average lining installation rate of 225 metres per week

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    88/142

    Fermilab Tunnels

    Estimate Summary

    12 ft dia tunnel (3.66 m)

    Rock Type Tunnel Drive Tunnel Length Drive Cost TBM setup Total

    (m)

    B First 4800 13,900,000 400,000 14,300,000

    B Second 4800 11,570,000 200,000 11,770,000

    B Third 4800 11,390,000 200,000 11,590,000

    B Fourth 4800 11,030,000 200,000 11,230,000

    B Fifth 4800 11,030,000 200,000 11,230,000

    B+ First 4800 23,380,000 400,000 23,780,000B+ Second 4800 20,610,000 200,000 20,810,000

    B+ Third 4800 20,400,000 200,000 20,600,000

    B+ Fourth 4800 19,970,000 200,000 20,170,000

    B+ Fifth 4800 19,970,000 200,000 20,170,000

    16 ft dia tunnel (4.88 m)

    Rock Type Tunnel Drive Tunnel Length Drive Cost TBM setup Total

    (m)

    B First 4800 17,740,000 400,000 18,140,000B Second 4800 13,560,000 200,000 13,760,000

    B Third 4800 13,250,000 200,000 13,450,000

    B Fourth 4800 12,610,000 200,000 12,810,000

    B Fifth 4800 12,610,000 200,000 12,810,000

    B+ First 4800 29,000,000 400,000 19,031,000

    B+ Second 4800 24,380,000 200,000 14,206,000

    B+ Third 4800 24,020,000 200,000 13,852,000

    B+ Fourth 4800 23,320,000 200,000 13,144,000

    B+ Fifth 4800 23,320,000 200,000 13,144,000

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    89/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    90/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    91/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    92/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    93/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    94/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    95/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    96/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    97/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    98/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    99/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    100/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    101/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    102/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    103/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    104/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    105/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    106/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    107/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    108/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    109/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    110/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    111/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    112/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    113/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    114/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    115/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    116/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    117/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    118/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    119/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    120/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    121/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    122/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    123/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    124/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    125/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    126/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    127/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    128/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    129/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    130/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    131/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    132/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    133/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    134/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    135/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    136/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    137/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    138/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    139/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    140/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    141/142

  • 7/30/2019 Very Large Hadron Collider

    142/142