vermelding onderdeel organisatie june 17, 2015 1 modeling subsurface iron removal geochemical...

31
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie March 25, 2022 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen van der Laan Faculty of Civil Engineering Msc. Water Management Specilization Drinking Water

Post on 20-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

April 18, 2023

1

Modeling subsurface iron removalGeochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk

Harmen van der Laan

Faculty of Civil EngineeringMsc. Water ManagementSpecilization Drinking Water

April 18, 2023 2

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

April 18, 2023 3

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

April 18, 2023 4

Subsurface iron removal

O2

front

0

1

inje

cted

wat

er

O2

fro

nt

injected

water

Fe2+

front 0

1

Fe2+

front

Fe2+

front

0

1

0

1

Fe2+

front

inje

cted

wat

er

Injection Extraction

Measured data

5April 18, 2023

April 18, 2023 6

Measured data

Development final iron concentration

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

injection - extraction cycles

Fe (

mg/

L)

July 1998 – June 2000 March 2004 – June 2005

‘Original’ Model

7April 18, 2023

V/Vi

Expanded model

8April 18, 2023

main limitation original model

No explanation for the phenomena of the increasing spread of the (iron) front over the successive cycles

April 18, 2023 9

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Objective

The objective of this research project is to• Find a theoretical foundation to explain the

development of the iron front over the successive cycles

• Enhance the existing model to obtain a proper description of the measured iron concentrations

10April 18, 2023

April 18, 2023 11

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

April 18, 2023 12

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

April 18, 2023 13

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite

FerrihydriteHfo, FeOH3, Fe5HO8·4H2O

Unstable, unstructured Amorphous / Aquaeous Spec. area ≈ 600 m2/g 2 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.1 Solubility log K = 2 –

4.5

Observed by: KIWA Research

Goethiteα-FeOOH

Stable Crystalline Spec. area ≈ 60 m2/g 2 - 10 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.7 Solubility log K = -1

Observed by: Mettler (2002)

April 18, 2023 14

Surface complexation theory

OHOH

OHOH

OH + / - depends

on pH

Number of sites

Surface area

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

April 18, 2023 15

Site density

April 18, 2023 16

Surface characterization

April 18, 2023 17

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite ?

• Variations in site density and surface area only result in small bandwidth

• Differences between Goethite and Ferrihydrite not the main limitation

α-FeOOH

Ferrihydrite

‘solubility’ decreases in time

April 18, 2023 18

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Exchange

April 18, 2023 19

Exchange

April 18, 2023 20

Exchange and adsorption hard to distinguish

Exchange capacity = lumped parameter

Empirical formula

does not give correct output

CEC (meq/kg) = 7 · (% clay) + 35 · (% C)

April 18, 2023 21

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

April 18, 2023 22

Retardation / Front spreading

April 18, 2023 23

Microdispersion Macrodispersivity

Injection well

April 18, 2023 24

Dispersion

Stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 25

Stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 26

April 18, 2023 27

Results

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Preliminary Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Preliminary Conclusions

Objective is: Theoretical foundation and a better model

I. Many ‘flavors’, but I need too pick oneII. Model starts to describe the correct retardation

mainly because of dispersion / stagnant zones

April 18, 2023 28

April 18, 2023 29

Possible explanation

Ferric

iron

I. Kinetics: decrease SI in time / combination Ferrihydrite – Goethite

II. Stagnant zones III. Or:

Biological activity?Complexes? Change groundwater composition?

April 18, 2023 30

Next steps & Recommendations

Next steps Tracer in groundwater for dispersion? Implementation stagnant zones Influence conclusions on accumulation Finish model

Recommendations Column experiments:

separate transport model from geochemistry Research Ferrihydrite / Goethite

April 18, 2023 31

Questions?