vehicle emission testing of ert’s technology€¦ · this is a 88.2% reduction in hydrocarbons...

Vehicles tested were:

1) Mazda 626 1998 2) Hyundai i45 20103) BMW 335i 2007

Why are the effects on Hydrocarbons a good measure of emission success of the ERT Solution?

Emissions that are principal pollutants of concern are Hydrocarbons - A class of burned or partially burned fuel. Hydrocarbons are toxins.

HC = Hydrocarbons, concentration of the exhaust in parts per million (ppm). = Unburned Petrol, represents the amount of unburned fuel due to incomplete combustion exiting through the exhaust. We don't want it, so we try to keep it as low as possible. An approximate relationship between the percentage of wasted fuel through incomplete combustion and the ppm of HC is about 1/200 ( 1.0% partially burned fuel produces 200 ppm HC, 10%=2000 ppm HC, 0.1%=20 ppm HC )

A reduction in Hydrocarbons with the ERT technology applied is showing in basic terms that the petrol is being used more efficiently in its combustion and therefore a reduced amount of unburnt fuel is being released into the atmosphere.

Good combustion is simply put this way: HC + O2 + N2 = H2O + CO2 + N2. Ideally, what we want is to convert all the Fuel and Air that enters the engine in to Water and Nitrogen!

We utilised an independent Vehicle Testing centre to test the emission effect (mainly hydrocarbons) on a range of petrol vehicles before and after the Emission Reduction Technologies' solution was installed in the tested vehicles.

Vehicle Emission Testing of ERT’s Technology

Vehicle 1. Mazda 626 1998

Result 1

Baseline emission test with the car idling for approx. 3 minutes and then the result was taken with no ERT technology connected. Hydrocarbons were 159 parts per million (ppm)

Result 2

Following the idle test another baseline test was performed without the ERT technology connected but with the car holding at 3000 revs for approx. 3 minutes, then the result was taken. Hydrocarbons were 79 ppm.

Result 2

Baseline - NO ERT connected – car idling

Result 1

Baseline - NO ERT connected – car 3000rev

Result 3 Result 4

Prior to Result 3 & 4 we connected the ERT technology via VPN (Android Smart Phone) and connected into the ERT data centre. The phone was connected through the vehicles electrical system.

Result 3

Emission test with the car idling for approx. 3 minutes and the ERT technology connected, then the result was taken. As an initial idle comparison we can see that the Hydrocarbons have reduced from:

This is a 95.6% reduction in hydrocarbons

Result 4

Following the idle emission test, the car was then held at 3000 revs for approx. 3 minutes with the ERT technology connected, then the result was taken.


ERT connected – car 3000rev ERT connected – car idling

Result 5 Result 6

Result 5. Emission test after the drive, with the car idling and the ERT technology still connected. Comparing idle readings:


Result 6. Emission test with the car holding at 3000 revs for approx. 3mins with the ERT technology still connected following car drive.


Prior to Result 5 & 6

The driver went for a drive up and down the motorway (approx. 15min & 20km) connected on the ERT technology and then returning to the vehicle testing station for the final two emission tests.

ERT connected post drive– car idling ERT connected post drive – car 3000rev

In Summary the Mazda 626 (1998) started with 159 ppm hydrocarbons prior to the ERT technology being applied and reduced to 5 ppm following the final test. This is a 96.9% reduction in hydrocarbons.

This occurred over a total of approx. 37 minutes of total testing. You can review the video for further overview of the independent testing protocol.

Vehicle 2. Hyundai i45 2010

Result 1


Result 2


Result 2


Result 1


Result 3 Result 4

Prior to Result 3 & 4 we connected the ERT technology

Result 3



Result 4




Result 5 Result 6



Result 6. Emission test with the car holding at 3000 revs for 3-5mins with the ERT technology still connected following car drive.





In Summary the Hyundai i45 (2010) started with 37 ppm hydrocarbons prior to the ERT technology being applied and reduced to 2 ppm following the final test. This is a 94.6% reduction in hydrocarbons.


Vehicle 3. BMW 335i

Result 1


Result 2


Result 2


Result 1


Result 3 Result 4

Prior to Result 3 & 4 we connected the ERT technology

Result 3



Result 4




Result 5 Result 6



Result 6. Emission test with the car holding at 3000 revs for 3-5mins with the ERT technology still connected following car drive.





In Summary the BMW 335i 2007 started with 159 ppm hydrocarbons prior to the ERT technology being applied and reduced to 1 ppm following the final test. This is a 99.4% reduction in hydrocarbons.


The average reduction in hydrocarbons was 97.7% over the three vehicles

Thank you for your time.

From the ERT team

vehicle emission testing of ert’s technology€¦ · this is a 88.2% reduction in hydrocarbons...

Documents