uvm presentation
DESCRIPTION
Summary of activities and research conducted at the University of Vermont, funded by the Henry and Camille Dreyfus FoundationTRANSCRIPT
Dan Nielsen
February 19, 2010
Derivatization of Polar Organic Compounds for TD-GC/MS Analysis
0\\sidney\holmengroup\PresentationsByGroup\
Dan’s Presentations\Dreyfus_Final_Presentation.ppt
O
R1 R2
F F
F
F F
CH2
O NH2
+ + OH2
Ketone or
Aldehyde
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
R2
OximePFBHA
R
OH
Carboxylic Acid
or Alcohol
N
O(H3C)3Si
F3C Si(CH3)3
BSTFA
R
O
Si(CH3)3+
O
NH2F3CO
F3C NH
Si(CH3)3Silylated Derivative
+
CEMS COLLEGE OF Engineering and Mathematical SciencesCEMS COLLEGE OF Engineering and Mathematical SciencesCEMS COLLEGE OF Engineering and Mathematical Sciences
Acknowledgments
Dr. Britt Holmén
Ron Tackett and many others (Agilent Technologies)
Floyd Vilmont (Eng. Machinist, UVM)
Bruce O’Rourke (Chemistry, UVM)
Chris Jakober (CA, Air Resources Board)
The Dreyfus Foundation
1
Accomplishments
2
Setting up lab:
- Chemical storage
- Glassware cleaning station
- SFE setup (repaired dual piston pump)
- Coy chamber improvements
- CI upgrade on 5973MS
- Overhauled diffusion pump on 5972MS
- GC/FID setup and configuration
- Maintained both GC/MSs
- Nitrogen blowdown station
Accomplishments
Assisted with Holmén group activities:
- Melanoma detection grant research
- Protection devices grant research and proposal writing
- Safety representative (received model lab status for Votey 122B)
- Completed final budget tally for the Career grant
- Assisted students:
Kate Johannesen, Mike Kreigh, Timothy Kelly, Kristofer Kretsch
Tucker Stevens, Paul Montane, Matt Casari, Mitchell Robinson,
Karen Sentoff, John Kasumba, Jiangjiang Zhu, Anna Conterato,
Damon Lane, Courtney Giles, and Vaishali Sharma
3
Accomplishments
• Presented research:
- CEMS: Oct. 10, 2008
- AAAR conference: Oct. 22,2008
- Holmén group: Mar. 3, 2008, Jul. 28, 2008, Sep. 17, 2008,
Jan. 7, 2009, Jun. 29, 2009, Sep. 28, 2009, Feb. 8, 2010.
• Developed micro-derivatization procedure for hydroxylated
compounds utilizing BSTFA (potentially for TD-GC/NCI-MS).
• Developed micro-derivatization procedure for carbonylated
compounds using PFBHA (potentially for TD-GC/NCI-MS).
• Successfully tested PFBHA procedure using NIST DPM,
optimized scale down and work-up procedure for 0.1 – 1mg DPM
quantities.
4
Outline
• Background
• Experimental
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Studies
5
Background
• Vehicle exhaust (150–300ºC) is primarily N2, O2, H2O and CO2.
• Minor constituents are CO, hydrocarbons, NOx and Particulate
Matter (PM).
Maricq, M. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 38, 1079.
• Many POCs have been identified as
products of incomplete combustion.
• POCs additionally generated as
secondary products from reaction
with O3, OH, NO3, light (>290nm).
• The high polarity of many species
prohibits or negatively affects
separation by gas chromatography
due to adsorption to injector and
column active sites.
6
Outline
• Background
• Experimental
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Studies
7
One-Step Derivatizations
Ho, S.S.H. and J.Z. Yu. Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 1232.
Forester, C.D., et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41, 1188.
+
Carboxylic Acid
or Alcohol
+
O
R1 R2
F F
F
F F
CH2
O NH2
+ OH2
Ketone or
Aldehyde
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
R2
Oxime (isomers)PFBHA
R
OH N
O(H3C)3Si
F3C Si(CH3)3
BSTFA
R
O
Si(CH3)3
O
NH2F3CO
F3C NH
Si(CH3)3Silylated Derivative
+
8
Two-Step Derivatization
Ortiz, R., et al. Atmospheric Research, 2006, 82, 709.
9
O
R1
OH
F F
F
F F
CH2
O NH2
+ + OH2
Multifunctional
Compound
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
O Si(CH3)3
Oxime (isomers)PFBHA
Oxime Derivative with Alcohol Group
N
O(H3C)3Si
F3C Si(CH3)3
BSTFA Two-Step Oxime Silylated Derivative
+
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
OH
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
OH
Experimental Variables
PFBHA: 1. Extraction technique
2. Solvent composition
3. Concentration and Excess of reagent
4. Time
BSTFA: 1 – 4. (Above)
5. Heating reaction (60ºC, 2h)
6. Blowdown between derivatization reactions
7. Use of drying agents (e.g., Na2SO4, molecular sieves)
10
Recovery/Quantification Internal Standards
12
Compound Structure VPi VPf MWi MWf
IUPAC Name (Abbreviation) mm Hg mm Hg g/mol g/mol
Recovery Standards
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-
octadeuterionaphthalene
(Nap-d8)1.59E-1 1.59E-1 136 136
1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-
decadeuterioacenaphthene
(Ace-d10)6.98E-3 6.98E-3 164 164
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10-
decadeuteriophenanthrene
(Phe-d10)2.06E-4 2.06E-4 188 188
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12-
dodecadeuteriochrysene
(Chr-d12)8.5E-8 8.5E-8 240 240
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12-
dodecadeuterioperylene
(Per-d12)1.81E-8 1.81E-8 264 264
Quantification Standards
2-fluorobenzaldehyde
(2-FBA)1.16 Not Avail. 124.11 319
6-fluoro-4-chromanone
(6-F-4-C)3.47E-3 Not Avail. 166.15 361
5-fluoro-1-indanone
(5-F-1-I)2.63E-02 Not Avail. 150.15 345
O
O
F
O
O
F
O
F
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
DD
D
D D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
D D D D
D
PFBHA Reactive POC Surrogates
13
Compound Structure VPi VPf MWi MWf
IUPAC Name (Abbreviation) mm Hg mm Hg g/mol g/mol
Alkyl Ketone
Hexan-2-one
(H-2-O) 1.16E1 5.36E-3 100 295
Aryl Ketone
1-phenylethanone
(1-PE) 3.97E-1 Not Avail. 120 315
Alkyl Diketone
Hexane-2,5-dione
(H-2,5-D) 5.87E-1 Not Avail. 114 504
Quinone
1,4-benzoquinone
(1,4-BQ)9.00E-1 Not Avail. 108 498
Alkyl Aldehyde
Decanal
(DA)1.03E-1 6.91E-5 156 351
Phenyl Aldehyde
Benzaldehyde
(BA)1.27 7.09E-4 106 301
CH3 CH3
O
CH3
O
CH3
CH3
O
O
OO
H
O
CH3
O
H
Instrument Standards
14
Compound Structure VPi VPf MWi MWf
IUPAC Name (Abbreviation) mm Hg mm Hg g/mol g/mol
Instrument Standards
2,2-difluorobiphenyl
(2,2-DFB)4.65E-2 4.65E-2 190.19 190
Fluorene
(Flu)3E-3 3E-3 166.22 166.22
Phenanthrene
(Phe)2.06E-4 2.06E-4 178 178
F
F
DPM Extraction Procedure
15
Sonication Centrifugation Blowdown/Transfer Derivatization
Instrumental Analysis (TD-GC/EI-MS and GC/CI-MS)
16
Outline
• Background
• Experimental
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Studies
17
Results: Native POCs (underivatized)
18Jakober, C.A., et al., Anal. Chem., 2006. 78(14): p. 5086-5093.
Results: TD-GC/MS Results
B2p12 %
ACN 89.4
DCM 10.2
MeOH 0.4
B2p15
ACN 65.9
DCM 7.3
MeOH 26.8
B2p16
ACN 65.9
DCM 14.6
MeOH 2.4
Hexane 17.1
% Yield PCI (Scan) B2p12, 15, 16 [using d-PAHs (IS) or phenylethanone oxime (PO) for quantitation]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Hex
anon
e_ox
ime
Phe
nyleth
anon
e_ox
ime
Dec
anon
e_ox
ime
Phe
nylpen
tano
ne_o
xim
e
Hex
aned
ione
_oxim
e
p-Ben
zoqu
inon
e_ox
ime
% r
ec
ov
ery
B2p12 IS
B2p12 PO
B215-1 IS
B2p15-1 PO
B2p15-2 IS
B2p15-2 PO
B2p16-1 IS
B2p16-1 PO
B2p16-2 IS
B2p16-2 PO
Results: TD-GC/MS Results
20
B2p12 %
ACN 89.4
DCM 10.2
MeOH 0.4
B2p15
ACN 65.9
DCM 7.3
MeOH 26.8
B2p16
ACN 65.9
DCM 14.6
MeOH 2.4
Hexane 17.1
% Yield EI (Scan) B2p12, 15, 16 [using d-PAHs (IS) or phenylethanone oxime (PO) for quantitation]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Hex
anon
e_ox
ime
Phe
nyleth
anon
e_ox
ime
Dec
anon
e_ox
ime
Phe
nylpen
tano
ne_o
xim
e
Hex
aned
ione
_oxim
e
p-Ben
zoqu
inon
e_ox
ime
% r
eco
very
B2p12 IS
B2p12 PO
B215-1 IS
B2p15-1 PO
B2p16-1 IS
B2p16-1 PO
Pulsed Injection Study
21
Pulsed injection study
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
4-FBA-Ox 6-F-4-C-Ox BA-Ox 1-PE-Ox 1-PP-1-O-Ox H-2,5-D-Ox
Oxime Derivative
Rela
tive p
erc
en
t ab
un
dan
ce
0.5min 1ml/min
0.5min 2ml/min
1min 1ml/min
1min 2ml/min
2min 1ml/min
2min 2ml/min
Concentration effect of PFBHA using large molar excess
22
0.5mM 5mM 5:0.5mM
Rsp/pg Rsp/pg Factor
hexan-2-one_oxime 15 83 5
benzaldehyde_oxime 68 210 3
1-phenylethanone_oxime 18 161 9
decanal_oxime 62 165 3
hexane-2,5-dione_oxime 27 109 4
1,4-benzoquinone_oxime 0.4 214 514
GC/NCI-MS Percent Recovery Results
23
PFBHA Derivative
% Rec RSD % Rec RSD
hexan-2-one oxime 99 2.9 101 5.7
2-fluorobenzaldehyde oxime 96 1.9 98 2.9
benzaldehyde oxime 94 2.5 98 4.3
1-phenylethanone oxime 94 2.2 96 3.0
decanal oxime 95 2.2 99 2.8
1-phenylpentan-1-one oxime 92 2.1 96 2.6
5-fluoro-1-indanone oxime 94 2.3 99 3.1
hexane-2,5-dione oxime 91 2.4 96 3.8
1,4-benzoquinone oxime 95 3.8 99 2.9
25pg at 48h 250pg at 48h
n=4 replicates using calibration curve samples 1 – 400pg
TD-GC/EI-MS versus GC/NCI and PCI-MS
24
Approximate response/pg injected factors for NCI:EI:PCI ≈ 200:40:1
Liquid injection: 0.1 – 10% sample mass analyzed
TD injection: 100% sample mass analyzed (minus blowdown losses)
min max min max min max min max min max
hexan-2-one-oxime - - 15 105 100 619 9 389 7 20
2-fluorobenzaldehyde-oxime - - 41 163 671 817 118 817 - -
benzaldehyde-oxime - - 14 210 710 1675 168 1675 2 4
1-phenylethanone-oxime - - 15 161 650 1459 158 985 3 4
decanal-oxime - - 27 165 135 513 41 513 3 5
6-fluoro-4-chromanone-oxime - - 4 193 700 1419 193 1027 5 6
hexane-2,5-dione-oxime - - 27 109 62 389 48 299 2 2
1,4-benzoquinone-oxime - - 0.4 281 106 600 107 600 1 6
1,4-napthoquinone (native) 14 - - - - - - - - -
4-fluorobenzophenone (native) 26 - - - - - - - - -
no blowdownblowndownno blowdownblowndownno blowdown
rsp/pg rsp/pg rsp/pg rsp/pg rsp/pg
TD-GC/EI-MS TD-GC/EI-MS GC/NCI-MS GC/NCI-MS GC/PCI-MS
TD-GC/EI-MS versus GC/NCI and PCI-MS
25
Approximate injection LOD factors for NCI:EI:PCI ≈ 1:10:350
Liquid injection: 0.1 – 10% sample mass analyzed
Thermal desorption injection: 100% sample mass analyzed
(minus blowdown losses)
TD-GC/EI-MS GC/NCI-MS GC/PCI-MS
LOD (pg) LOD (pg) LOD (pg)
hexan-2-one_oxime 10 1 51
benzaldehyde_oxime 5 0.3 256
1-phenylethanone_oxime 6 0.5 286
decanal_oxime 6 1 213
6-fluoro-4-chromanone_oxime 5 0.5 159
hexane-2,5-dione_oxime 9 2 423
1,4-benzoquinone_oxime 4 0.8 172
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
26
he
xan
-2-o
ne
_o
xim
e, 9
.51
5
un
kno
wn
_o
xim
e_
39
1, 1
2.8
19
2-f
luo
rob
en
zald
eh
yde
_o
xim
e, 1
3.1
92
be
nza
lde
hyd
e_
oxi
me
, 13
.33
5
1-p
he
nyl
eth
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
3.6
31
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_m
on
oo
xim
e, 1
3.8
73
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 14
.16
9
5-f
luo
ro-1
-in
dan
on
e_
oxi
me
, 14
.94
8
6-f
luo
ro-4
-ch
rom
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.3
43
8-F
luo
ro-1
-be
nzo
sub
ero
ne
, 15
.53
5 he
xan
e-2
,5-d
ion
e_
oxi
me
, 15
.73
9
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
7.4
07
0.0E+00
2.0E+05
4.0E+05
6.0E+05
8.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.2E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
10ng POCs using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
27
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.1ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
0.1ng AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
28
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.5ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
0.5ng AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
29
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
2ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
2ng AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
30
he
xan
-2-o
ne
_o
xim
e, 9
.51
5
un
kno
wn
_o
xim
e_
39
1, 1
2.8
19
2-f
luo
rob
en
zald
eh
yde
_o
xim
e, 1
3.1
92
be
nza
lde
hyd
e_
oxi
me
, 13
.33
5
1-p
he
nyl
eth
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
3.6
31
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_m
on
oo
xim
e, 1
3.8
73
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 14
.16
9
5-f
luo
ro-1
-in
dan
on
e_
oxi
me
, 14
.94
8
6-f
luo
ro-4
-ch
rom
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.3
43
8-F
luo
ro-1
-be
nzo
sub
ero
ne
, 15
.53
5h
exa
ne
-2,5
-dio
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.7
39
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
7.4
07
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
10ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
10ng AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
31
he
xan
-2-o
ne
_o
xim
e, 9
.51
5
un
kno
wn
_o
xim
e_
39
1, 1
2.8
19
2-f
luo
rob
en
zald
eh
yde
_o
xim
e, 1
3.1
92
be
nza
lde
hyd
e_
oxi
me
, 13
.33
5
1-p
he
nyl
eth
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
3.6
31
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_m
on
oo
xim
e, 1
3.8
73
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 14
.16
9
5-f
luo
ro-1
-in
dan
on
e_
oxi
me
, 14
.94
8
6-f
luo
ro-4
-ch
rom
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.3
43
8-F
luo
ro-1
-be
nzo
sub
ero
ne
, 15
.53
5h
exa
ne
-2,5
-dio
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.7
39
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
7.4
07
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.1 - 10ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
10ng AQ
2ng AQ
0.5ng AQ
0.1ng AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
32
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.1ng POC no acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
0.1ng no AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
33
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.5ng POC no acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
0.5ng no AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
34
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
2ng POC no acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
2ng no AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
35
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
10ng POC no acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
10ng no AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
36
he
xan
-2-o
ne
_o
xim
e, 9
.51
5
un
kno
wn
_o
xim
e_
39
1, 1
2.8
19
2-f
luo
rob
en
zald
eh
yde
_o
xim
e, 1
3.1
92
be
nza
lde
hyd
e_
oxi
me
, 13
.33
5
1-p
he
nyl
eth
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
3.6
31
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_m
on
oo
xim
e, 1
3.8
73
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 14
.16
9
5-f
luo
ro-1
-in
dan
on
e_
oxi
me
, 14
.94
8
6-f
luo
ro-4
-ch
rom
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.3
43
8-F
luo
ro-1
-be
nzo
sub
ero
ne
, 15
.53
5h
exa
ne
-2,5
-dio
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.7
39
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
7.4
07
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.1 - 10ng POCs using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
10ng no AQ
2ng no AQ
0.5ng no AQ
0.1ng no AQ
Acetone Quench Study (TD-GC/EI-MS)
37
he
xan
-2-o
ne
_o
xim
e, 9
.51
5
un
kno
wn
_o
xim
e_
39
1, 1
2.8
19
2-f
luo
rob
en
zald
eh
yde
_o
xim
e, 1
3.1
92
be
nza
lde
hyd
e_
oxi
me
, 13
.33
5
1-p
he
nyl
eth
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
3.6
31
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_m
on
oo
xim
e, 1
3.8
73
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 14
.16
9
5-f
luo
ro-1
-in
dan
on
e_
oxi
me
, 14
.94
8
6-f
luo
ro-4
-ch
rom
ano
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.3
43
8-F
luo
ro-1
-be
nzo
sub
ero
ne
, 15
.53
5h
exa
ne
-2,5
-dio
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
5.7
39
1,4
-be
nzo
qu
ino
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
7.4
07
0.0E+00
1.0E+06
2.0E+06
3.0E+06
4.0E+06
5.0E+06
6.0E+06
7.0E+06
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
0.1 - 10ng POC using acetone quench, EI-MS scan mode, ion 181m/z
10ng AQ
2ng AQ
0.5ng AQ
0.1ng AQ
NIST DPM (GC/NCI-MS)
38
hexa
n-2
-one
_ox
ime,
7.9
82
ben
zald
ehyd
e_ox
ime,
11.
366
1-p
heny
leth
anon
e_o
xim
e, 1
1.92
2
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 12
.91
8
hex
ane-
2,5
-dio
ne_
oxi
me,
15
.78
1
1,4
-ben
zoq
uin
on
e_o
xim
e, 1
8.8
05
5-fl
uoro
-1-i
ndan
one_
oxi
me,
14.
263
2-f
luor
oben
zald
ehyd
e_ox
ime,
11.
122
6-f
luor
o-4
-chr
oman
one_
oxim
e, 1
4.97
0
0.0E+00
5.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.5E+05
2.0E+05
2.5E+05
3.0E+05
3.5E+05
4.0E+05
5 10 15 20 25 30
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
Calibration curve samples (0.1 - 10ng POC) NCI-MS SIM mode
200pg Inj
40pg Inj.
10pg Inj.
2pg Inj.
NIST DPM (GC/NCI-MS)
39
hexa
n-2
-one
_ox
ime,
7.9
82
ben
zald
ehyd
e_ox
ime,
11.
366
1-p
heny
leth
anon
e_o
xim
e, 1
1.92
2
de
can
al_
oxi
me
, 12
.91
8
hex
ane-
2,5
-dio
ne_
oxi
me,
15
.78
1
1,4
-ben
zoq
uin
on
e_o
xim
e, 1
8.8
05
5-fl
uoro
-1-i
ndan
one_
oxi
me,
14.
263
2-f
luor
oben
zald
ehyd
e_ox
ime,
11.
122
6-f
luor
o-4
-chr
oman
one_
oxim
e, 1
4.97
0
0.0E+00
5.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.5E+05
2.0E+05
2.5E+05
3.0E+05
3.5E+05
4.0E+05
5 10 15 20 25 30
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
Calibration curve samples (0.1 - 10ng POC) NCI-MS SIM mode
200pg Inj
40pg Inj.
10pg Inj.
2pg Inj.
NIST DPM (TD-GC/EI-MS)
40
0.0E+00
2.0E+06
4.0E+06
6.0E+06
8.0E+06
1.0E+07
1.2E+07
1.4E+07
1.6E+07
7 12 17 22 27 32
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
NIST DPM 0.1mg TD-GC/EI-MS, scan mode and ion 181m/z
Scan mode
ion 181m/z
NIST DPM (GC/PCI-MS)
41
0.0E+00
2.0E+03
4.0E+03
6.0E+03
8.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.2E+04
5 10 15 20 25 30
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
NIST DPM 0.5mg PCI-MS Scan mode, ions 181 and 155m/z
181m/z
155m/z
hex
an-2
-on
e_o
xim
e, 7
.89
2m
in
ben
zald
ehyd
e_ox
ime,
11.
366m
in
6-fl
uoro
-4-c
hrom
anon
e_ox
ime,
14.
970m
in
hexa
ne-2
,5-d
ione
_ox
ime,
15.
781m
in
1-ph
enyl
etha
none
_ox
ime,
11.
922m
in
deca
nal_
oxim
e, 1
2.91
8
5-fl
uo
ro-1
-in
da
no
ne
_o
xim
e, 1
4.2
63
min
2-fl
uo
rob
enza
ldeh
yde_
oxi
me,
11
.12
2m
in
0.0E+00
1.0E+05
2.0E+05
3.0E+05
4.0E+05
5.0E+05
6.0E+05
7.0E+05
8.0E+05
9.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.1E+06
1.2E+06
1.3E+06
1.4E+06
6 8 10 12 14 16
Ab
un
dan
ce
Time (min)
NIST DPM 0.5mg Scan mode, selected ions using PCI and NCI-MS
PCI 181m/z
NCI 167m/z
NCI 178m/z
NCI 181m/z
NCI 197m/z
NIST DPM (GC/PCI-MS and GC/NCI-MS)
42
+
Carboxylic Acid
or Alcohol
+
O
R1 R2
F F
F
F F
CH2
O NH2
+ OH2
Ketone or
Aldehyde
F F
F
F F
CH2
O N
R1
R2
Oxime (isomers)PFBHA
R
OH N
O(H3C)3Si
F3C Si(CH3)3
BSTFA
R
O
Si(CH3)3
O
NH2F3CO
F3C NH
Si(CH3)3Silylated Derivative
+
C6F5CH2-
Fragment Ion
C6F5CH2O-
C6F5CH2-
C6F5-
Dissociation ion
DPM POC Characterization
43Jakober, C.A., et al., Anal. Chem., 2006. 78(14): p. 5086-5093.
Recovery Standard
Ave % rec RSD
2-fluorobenzaldehyde 44 23
5-fluoro-1-indanone 91 33
GC/NCI-MS
All compounds analyzed as their oxime.
Compound Jakober
2mg min max min max
ppmm ng/mg ng/mg ng/mg ng/mg
hexan-2-one 190 4 32 1 551
benzaldehyde 63 23 117 5 921
1-phenylethanone 5 40 95 7 597
decanal 58 1 4 3 106
hexane-2,5-dione 310 0.4 2 1 22
1,4-benzoquinone 460 0.4 1 0 5
GC/NCI-MSTD-GC/EI-MS
BSTFA Derivatization Results
Compound Structure b.p. MWi MWf
# IUPAC Name (Synonms) ºC g/mo g/mo
16Decan-1-ol 1-Decanol
Caprinic alcohol
231 158 230
Aryl Carboxylic Acids
18Benzoic acid Benzenecarboxylic acid
Carboxylbenzene
249 122 194
Alkyl Carboxylic Acids
21Octanoic acid Caprylic acid
1-Heptanecarboxylic acid
237 144 216
Alkyl Dicarboxylic Acids
22Oxalic acid Ethanedioic acid
149 (sub.)
90 234
O
OH
OH
O
CH3
O
OH
O
OH
OHCH3
Compound (retention time) Na2SO4_4h Na2SO4_24h no Na2SO4_3h no Na2SO4_26h
% yield % yield % yield % yield
Decafluorobiphenyl (13.5min) 120 63 27 31
Pyrene (27.9min) 185 102 89 82
Ethanedioic_acid_bis(trimethylsilyl)ester (14.1min) 0 0 0 1
Benzoic_acid_trimethylsilyl_ester (16.5min) 134 77 26 44
Octanoic_acid_trimethylsilyl_ester (16.9min) 136 90 36 44
(Decyloxy)trimethylsilane (18.8min) 49 31 11 23
44
BSTFA Derivatization Results
45
Outline
• Background
• Experimental
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Studies
46
Conclusions
• Carbonyl compounds using PFBHA:
- Limit of Detection
Jakober 1,4-BQ: 12pg (46 HPLC-APCI-ITMS)
Nielsen 1,4-BQ: <2pg w/out DPM matrix using NCI-MS
- Range of Detection
hexanone to 1,4-benzoquinone
possibly napthoquinone with higher injector temp. (>320°C)
• Hydroxyl compounds using BSTFA:
– Further investigations needed
– Derivatives may be lost with blowdown
– Water may be a concern
• Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter:
– TD-GC/EI-MS: ~ 50 – 500ug DPM (100% injection)
– GC/NCI-MS: ~ 50 – 500ug DPM (2% Injection)
– LODs less than 2pg/inj. for all tested compounds
– Potentially utilize TD-GC/NCI-MS for ppbm POCs in DPM samples
47
Jakober, C.A., et al., Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007. 41(13): p. 4548-4554.
Outline
• Background
• Experimental
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Studies
48
Future Studies
• Acetone quench study for GC/NCI-MS:
1. Acetone quench with complete blowdown
2. Acetone quench without complete blowdown
3. No acetone quench
• Deactivate glassware to minimize adsorption to
silanol sites
• Distill solvents to remove impurities
• Dr. Sharma utilizing derivatization procedure for
continuing research with DPM toxicity to rat cells.
49