uttarakhand state-road investment program - tranche 3 · uttarakhand state-road investment program...

Uttarakhand State-Road Investment Program - Tranche 3

Social Monitoring Report

Project Number: 38255-043 March 2015 Period: February 2013 – February 2015

This report has been submitted to ADB by the Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Prepared by

Public Works Department, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun

0

Uttarakhand State Road Investment Program (USRIP) (Phase-III)

LOAN No: 3040-IND

Reporting Period: February 2013 to February 2015

Consolidated External Monitoring Report

[Implementation of Resettlement Plans]

Prepared by:

Project Management Unit, ADB (Transport), Public Works Department,

21 Engineers Enclave, GMS Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand – 248001

Signed by:-

(Er. Lokesh Kumar Sharma)

Project Director/Chief Engineer Level-I

1

CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 4

2. PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 5

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 5

3.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF RESETTLEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR SOCIAL SAFEGUARD ....................................................................................... 8 3.4 EXTERNAL MONITORING ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.5 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.6 MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.7 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION ........................................................................................ 9 3.8 PREPARATION OF MICRO PLAN AND COMPENSATION SCHEDULE ........................................................................ 10 3.9 LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION FOR AFFECTED PERSONS .................................................................. 10 3.10 TRAINING FOR SKILL UP GRADATION AND INCOME GENERATION ...................................................................... 12 3.11 MINIMIZATION OF RESETTLEMENT IMPACT .................................................................................................................... 12 3.12 R&R ASSISTANCE TO AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS .............................................................................................................. 13 3.13 OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 3.14 COMPLIANCE TO SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.15 EFFECTIVENESS OF RP IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................................ 15 3.16 LESSON LEARNED .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Sub Project Roads having Social Impact ........................................................................................................... 5

Table2: Road wise Status of RP Implementation and Commencement of Civil Work……………………………………………….7

Table 3: CSCs Responsible for External Monitoring of RP Implementation ...................................................................................... 9

Table 4: Details of RP Disclosure ....................................................................................................................................................... 9

Table 5: Details of Consultation Meetings ........................................................................................................................................ 10

Table 6: Details of Land Acquisition……………………………………………………………………………………………… 11

Table 7: Details of Compensation paid to Affected Households .................................................................................................... 121

Table 8: Number of Participants and Villages Covered under the Training Programs ..................................................................... 12

Table 9: Number of Affected Household ........................................................................................................................................ 112

Table 10: Details of HIV/AIDS Awareness Program ....................................................................................................................... 13

Table 11: Details of Social Safeguard Compliances……………………............................................................................................13

LIST OF APPENDICES

Annexure-1: Entitlement Matrix Annexure-2: Details of Land Compensation given to Affected Title holders Annexure-3: Details of Payment to Non Titleholders (NTH) Annexure-4: Receipts of Depreciation Amount of Structures Paid to NTHs in 2nd Instalment Annexure-5: Monitoring Statement of Social Safeguards Issues in 89 Sub-Project Roads Annexure-6: Information sharing leaflet. Annexure-7: Photographs: Training Program and HIV/AIDS Awareness

2

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB : Asian Development Bank

AP : Affected Person

ARO : Assistant Resettlement Officer

BSR : Basic Schedule of Rates

CSC : Construction Supervision Consultant

DP : Displaced Person

HIFEED : Himalayan Institute for Environment, Ecology & Development

IPPF : Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework

LARR : Land Acquisition, Resettlement & Rehabilitation

NGO : Non Government Organization

PD : Project Director

PIU : Project Implementation Unit

PMC : Program Management Consultant

PMU : Project Management Unit

PWD : Public Works Department

R&R : Resettlement and Rehabilitation

RF : Resettlement Framework

RO : Resettlement Officer

RP : Resettlement Plan

SLAO : Special Land Acquisition Officer

USRIP : Uttarakhand State Road Investment Program

3

GLOSSARY

Affected

Household

– Means project affected household consisting of such persons, his or

her spouse, minor sons, unmarried daughters, minor brothers or

unmarried sister, father, mother and other members residing with

him/her and dependent on him/her for their livelihood.

Displaced Person

(DP)

– In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are

those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential

land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land,

assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a

result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary

restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and

protected areas

Compensation – Payment in cash or in kind of the replacement value of the acquired

property

Grievance

Redressal

Committee

– The committee established under the subproject to resolve the local

grievances

Involuntary

resettlement

– Addresses social and economic impacts that are permanent or temporary and are (i) caused by acquisition of land and other fixed assets, (ii) by change in the use of land, or (iii) restrictions imposed on land as a result of an ADB Project.

Land Acquisition – The process whereby land and properties are acquired for the purpose of the project construction

Rehabilitation – The measures provided under the resettlement plan other than payment of the compensation of acquired property.

Replacement Cost – The method of valuing assets to replace the loss at market value before the project or dispossession, or its nearest equivalent, plus any transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration, and titling costs. Replacement cost is based on market value before the project or dispossession, whichever is higher.

Resettlement – All the measures taken to mitigate all or any adverse impacts of the project on the DPs property and/or livelihoods including compensation, relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation

4

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. During the DPR preparation stage, PMU has taken all efforts to minimize the impact on land/structures and livelihood of villagers. Out of the 89 sub-project roads chosen for implementation, 5 sub-projects were having resettlement impacts, of which one road has the issue of land acquisition.

2. The key observations of the monitoring on the social safeguards in general and RP implementation in particular are summarised as follows:

• NGO along with PMU/PIU has played appreciative role in carrying out extensive meaningful consultations, interactive meetings and discussions with individual affected household with respect to compensation and resettlement assistance. The rapport established by the NGO at the site has resulted in the smooth and timely implementation of the RP. The communities are aware of the project and have positively participated in the project activities. No outstanding grievances were reported during the construction stage or while during the monitoring exercise;

• Joint verification by PMU/PIU Personnel, Revenue Department officials and NGO representative has identified the eligible affected household for compensation and resettlement assistance. As a result of the effective joint verification the number of eligible affected household reduced to 45 from the previous number of 54;

• During the DPR preparation stage, total 11 numbers of affected households would be having impact on land. However, during ground verification, a Gol-Khata was identified in which 27 Title owners with appropriate ownership documents was found eligible for compensation and assistance as per the guidelines of ADB and the Resettlement Framework;

• Compensation for the affected land was given as per the latest Circle Rates1 and was agreed upon through individual consultations with affected households. Compensation for affected structures were estimated based on latest Basic Schedule for Rates/ Circle Rates following the principles as per the agreed Resettlement Framework. The payment for structures was disbursed in two instalments i.e. the actual cost of structure excluding the depreciation value and the deducted deprecation amount following the entitlements matrix and ADB guidelines.

• The identified APs were not displaced from the existing location and also all the affected land/structure are viable even after due impact. The impact was not found significant on the primary source of income of the identified affected households. A total amount of Rs. 39,05,611/- has been paid to 45 AHs in four respective sub-project roads;

• Institutional arrangements followed the guidelines of Resettlement Framework. Resettlement Cell with support from Social Officer and AROs at PIU level has regularly monitored the RP implementation. Joint site verification, preparation of micro plan, disbursement of payments were done with due adherence to the agreed Resettlement Framework.

3. The monitoring of the RP implementation has been carried out by CSCs in view of ADB Safeguard Policy Statement and the Resettlement Framework agreed upon by PWD, Government of Uttarakhand as part of the USRIP loan agreement. The methods followed for the monitoring included (i) review and appraisal of sub-project reports and documents such as Resettlement Plan, Resettlement Framework, Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework, (ii) consultations with PMC and RP implementing NGO (iii) on-site observations and interactive meetings and discussions with the APs and other stakeholders.

4. Overall, the implementation of RP was carried out systematically by the PMU/PWD, with the facilitation of NGO- HIFEED. The entire exercise followed the ADB Social Safeguard Policies and Procedures. While, the negative impacts were minimised in some of the road sub projects by way of adjusting road width, the affected households on the other hand, were duly compensated through negotiated prices with prior consultation. The affected persons were found informed, aware and positive to the project activities.

1 Circle rates are rates for land and structures, which are calculated by appropriate government based on area, locality, distance from road head etc. and the same get revised after every two years or as decided by the District Magistrate.

5

MONITORING OF SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS

2. PROJECT BACKGROUND

5. India and State of Uttarakhand envision a reduction in poverty and an increase in personal incomes by improving personal mobility and accessibility through increased investment in road infrastructure. Investments under the Road Development Plan (RDP) include seven sequential projects to be implemented under the Uttarakhand State Road Investment Program between 2007 and 2017. For this purpose, a Framework Financing Agreement (FFA) was signed between Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Government of India (GoI) on 14 November 2006 with regard to Uttarakhand State Road Investment Program (USRIP). Subsequently on 18 December 2006, the Board approved the provisions of loans under a Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) in an aggregate amount up to $550 million to India for the investment program to finance part of the RDP. The loan amounting to $150.00 million for project III was negotiated on 24 December 2013 by the GoI and ADB and made effective on 28th January, 2014 by ADB. A total investment of $227.55 million was earmarked for Project III, with $150 million to be financed by loan from ADB.

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

6. The scope of infrastructure improvement component in Project III includes the strengthening and reconstruction of the selected sections of state highways, major district roads, and other district roads. The right-of-way (RoW) varies as there are roads that shall be widened to 5m or 7m for carriageways, but the existing 3.5 m single-lane carriageways will be retained. USRIP Phase- III is composed of 89 roads with a total length of 1036 km. Out of the 89 roads, 5 were found to have social impacts due to strengthening of roads and accordingly 5 Resettlement Plans (RP) have been prepared to guide the PWD in compensating and assisting the loss of 45 affected households. This report is the outcome of the monitoring carried out by the CSCs along with Project Management Unit (PMU) of RP implementation. Details of 5 roads having resettlement impact are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Sub Project Roads having Social Impact

S.

No Name of Project Road District Block

Category /

Type of Road

Length

(km)

1 Kalsi-Berath Khai Motor Marg to Kaha Nehra Unaha Motor Marg

Dehradun Kalsi VR 7.83

2

Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to

Maletha Datunu Badnu

Motor Marg

Dehradun Kalsi VR 6.02

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg Rudraprayag Agustmuni LVR 4.64

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road Rudraprayag Jakholi VR 8.00

5

Pauri Bend -Magnesite

Factory(Parlichina-

Magnesite Factory)

Bageshwar Bageshwar ODR 21.9

7. Kalsi-Berath Khai Motor Marg to Kaha Nehra Unaha Motor Marg: The selected road is a Village Road with single road specification and is proposed to be strengthened to a standard single lane with the carriageway of 3.75 meters. The road is kutcha and the width varies between 4.2 to 5.5 meters. Since it has been decided to use the formation width, the question of land acquisition is ruled out. RP has identified 2 affected households, whose water mill is affected. These affected households are identified as non-titleholders [encroachers]. However, as both the households belong to vulnerable category were found eligible for compensation as per the entitlement matrix.

6

8. Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha Datunu Badnu Motor Marg: the Sahiya Damta – Panuwa Motor Marg to Maletha Datunu Badnu Motor Road subproject located in Kalsi block of Dehradun district. The selected road is a Village Road with single road specification and is proposed to be strengthened to a standard single lane with the carriageway of 3.75 meters. The road is kutcha and the width varies between 4.5 to 5.5 meters. There is no land acquisition envisaged in this road. RP has identified an affected household whose cattle shed is affected, which encroached into the RoW. The affected household belong to vulnerable category and found eligible for compensation.

9. Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg: The selected road is a Light Vehicle Road with single road specification and is proposed to be upgraded to village road with the carriageway of 3.75 meters. The existing carriageway varies between 2.7 meters to 4.0 meters. Since the existing RoW is only 6 meters further 6 meters land is needed to be acquired throughout the road length (4.63 km) in order to improve the curves and establish total formation width as 5.95 meters. The joint verification by Revenue Department and PIU/PMU personnel along with RP implementing NGO has found an area of 4070 square meter of private land for acquisition. The DPR consultant recorded 11 affected households in the RP of Raitoli – Jasholi road subproject, out of which one land account has many shareholders who were not traced at the time of DPR preparation. However, after verification of NGO an additional 27 shareholders (titleholders) who were being affected had claimed for their ownership with required evidences duly verified by the revenue department and compensated accordingly. Therefore, the number of APs in Raitoli- Jasholi road subproject has increased substantially from 11 to 38.

10. Mayali-Jakholi Motor Road: The Mayali – Jakholi road subproject is located in the Jakholi block of Rudrapryag District. The road is passing through the mountainous terrain and is categorized as Village Road. There is no land acquisition envisaged in this road sub-project. RP has identified 4 affected households, whose commercial structure was being partially affected due to the proposed strengthening.

11. Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory (Parlichina- Magnesite Factory): The selected road is other district road (ODR) with single road specification and is proposed to be upgraded from single to single lane up gradation with 3.75 meters carriageway including hill side drains and shoulders. The existing carriageway varies between 3.2 meters to 3.75 meters. There is no land acquisition involved in this road sub-project. There are 4 affected households identified for resettlement assistance.

3.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK

12. The resettlement principles adopted for this Project recognize the Government of India’s Land Acquisition Act (1894), National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy (2007), and ‘Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and the relevant Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) policies and operations manuals, in particular the Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), and Operations Manual F1 (2010).

13. On account of these legal provisions, the Resettlement Framework (RF) approved for this project stipulates for compensation and assistance to all eligible APs irrespective of their customary rights of occupancy/titles and includes those who (i) lose/reduce land, (ii) source of income is adversely affected, (iii) houses and structures partially/fully demolished, (iv) other properties such as crops, trees, and other assets or access to these properties are reduced or damaged due to the project. A copy of Entitlement Matrix which is part of the Resettlement Framework is given in Annexure-1.

14. In addition to the RF, the project has an exclusive IPP Framework in place intended to guide the selection and preparation of sub-projects where impacts on tribal people are identified to ensure better distribution of the project benefits and promote development of the indigenous peoples in the Project areas. The IPP Framework seeks to ensure that indigenous peoples and tribal communities are informed, consulted and mobilized to participate in the sub-project preparation.

15. In USRIP, the PMU/PIU adopted ‘negotiated land acquisition’ which is been in practice in the state for linear acquisition since long back to avoid lengthy litigation process of Land Acquisition Act.

7

ADB also encourages negotiated settlement as it is normally a faster and more effective arrangement than expropriation 2 .Further, in this RPs implementation process the Circle Rates 3 given to the titleholders for negotiated land acquisition are found suitable by APs and have also given their consent during consultations in this regard.

16. Compensation for affected land/assets is based on replacement-cost principle in which a ‘Valuation Committee’ is established at the district level responsible for (i) independent valuation of land/other assets and (ii) completion of land acquisition on behalf of PWD, Govt. of Uttarakhand.

3.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF RESETTLEMENT PLAN

17. In this project 5 RPs were prepared by the DPR consultant in which, 4 were found suitable for the implementation. The execution of the RP of the project is an important component of the project implementation, which has several activities to be performed such as appointment and mobilisation of NGO, verification of affected persons, preparation of micro plan and identity cards, distribution of compensation and appraisal of other R&R issues, which is to be executed either before construction work or in between implementation of the project. For compliance of ADB’s Resettlement Policy, Social Expert of PMU has been made accountable and responsible for implementation of RP with the help of NGO, appointed for the exclusive task.

Table 2: Road wise Status of RP Implementation and Commencement of Civil Work

Sl.

No

Name of Sub-

project road District

Date of

Payment

Date of

Work order

to

Contractor

Date of

commence

ment of

work

Remarks

1 Pauri-Bend Magnesite factory

Bageshwar 30/12/2013 06/03/2014 07/11/2014

All the RPs were successfully implemented except partial disbursement of compensation in Road no. 2,3 & 4 which was slightly delayed due to engagement of PWD officials in management of Uttarakhand Natural Disaster occurred in June 2013. However, the disbursement was made well before the commencement of Civil work at the particular acquired chainage of road section.

2 Sahiya-Damta Panua-Datnu-

Dehradun 17/01/2014 13/12/2013 01/01/2014

3

Kalsi-Bairrotkhai road -Kaha -Nehra-Unha

Dehradun 17/01/2014 13/12/2013 01/01/2014

4 Raitoli-Jasholi Motor Road

Rudraprayag

28/12/2013, 30/12/2013, 28/03/2014, 13/06/2014

27/03/2014 05/01/2014

2 Para 16, Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards, A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Sourcebook –

Draft Working Document, ADB, November 2012 3 Circle rates are rates for land and structures, which are calculated by appropriate government based on area, locality, distance from road head etc. and the same get revised after every two years or as decided by the District Magistrate.

8

3.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR SOCIAL SAFEGUARD

18. There is a dedicated Project Management Unit exclusively for the execution of USRIP, with an Project Director (PD) in lead role. Two officers in the rank of Executive Engineer at PMU assist the PD in overall management of the project. There are two dedicated Subject Specialists placed at PMU respectively for the management of environmental and social safeguards since the inception of the Project. These Specialists are adequately qualified with about 10 years of functional experience in environmental and social safeguards management in infrastructure development projects. For implementation of projects total 11 PIUs were established for 18 different packages. These PIUs are under the direct supervision of Executive Engineers of respective Divisions. At PIU level a resettlement cell headed by a Resettlement Officer (RO) in the rank of Assistant Engineer has also been established for the project to take care of safeguard issues.

19. A Non Government Organization named Himalayan Institute for Environment, Ecology and Development (HIFEED) was hired for Implementation of RP and has entrusted the task of implementing rehabilitation and resettlement under USRIP-3 as per the guidelines of ADB. The contract agreement with HIFEED was signed on 18th February 2013 and the work was started on 25th February 2013. The role and responsibilities of NGO is summarized as follows:

� Information campaign o Verification of APs as per RPs o Preparation of leaflets for information sharing o Conduct meeting of APs and distribution of leaflets

� Identification of APs and Updating of Database o Preparation of ID cards o Provide information of RP updating o Collection of supporting documents

� Participation in Grievance Redress o Verify the R&R cost for disbursement of compensation, assistance, transitional allowance

� Livelihood Restoration o Identifying APs for training and impart training

� Relocation and Rehabilitation Assistance o Disbursement of compensation, assistance and assist in displacement of structures

� HIV/AIDS Awareness o Coordinate with state AIDS Control Society for technical assistance o Preparation of leaflets for information sharing among high-risk community

� Assist PMU/PIU to ensure that contracts comply with applicable labour laws (incl. child labour) and gender issues

� Preparation of Micro Plan and Due Diligence Report as ADB’s Safeguard Policy

20. The RP implementation NGO has carried out the entire above mentioned task to the satisfaction of PMU. However, the process of disbursement of compensation was slightly delayed in view of Uttarakhand natural disaster occurred in June 2013.

3.4 EXTERNAL MONITORING

21. Monitoring is a key activity in RP implementation in order to achieve resettlement objective as per ADB’s safeguard guidelines. The responsibility of external monitoring in this project is entrusted with Construction Supervision Consultants (CSCs). There are altogether 4 construction supervision consultants mobilized for USRIP –III having 89 road sub projects. However, only CSC -1, 3, & 4 are having road sub projects where RPs were implemented. The name of CSCs responsible for external monitoring of RP implementation is given in Table3.

9

Table 3: CSCs Responsible for External Monitoring of RP Implementation

S. No Name of Project Road Construction Supervision Consultant


Eurostudios S.L – M/s Theme Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. ( CSC-4)

2 Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha Datunu

Badnu Motor Marg

Eurostudios S.L – M/s Theme Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. (CSC-4)

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg Egis International in JV with Egis India Consultancy Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (CSC-3)

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road Egis International in JV with Egis India Consultancy Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (CSC-3)

5 Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory(Parlichina-

Magnesite Factory) Egis India Consultancy Engineers Pvt. Ltd., (CSC-1)

3.5 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM

22. Resettlement Framework insists forming of a Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) at the PIU level to deal with the disputes of APs and facilitate timely implementation of the sub-project. The GRC would be headed by the DC or a representative from Collector’s Office. The members of the GRC would include representative from PIU office, representative of APs particularly of the vulnerable AP, representative from local government and RP implementing NGO.

23. There are no outstanding grievances recorded to be taken up to the GRC. NGO had carried out an appreciative job in this respect. The interactive discussions during the post-disbursement of compensation also revealed that APs are satisfied with the sup-project implementation works.

3.6 MONITORING AND REPORTING

24. As discussed above, monitoring of the RP implementation is a critical activity in social safeguards. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are carried out according to the RP and in accordance with the existing laws of Government of Uttarakhand and ADB guidelines. It provides the necessary feedback for project management to keep the programme on schedule. The implementation of the RP has been closely monitored by the R&R Expert of CSCs. The CSCs were mobilized in between last quarter of 2013 and first quarter of 2014. This consolidate monitoring report is the outcome of periodic monitoring of the RP’s implementation by the CSCs safeguard experts.

3.7 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION

25. Resettlement Framework along with Entitlement Matrix was translated into local language (Hindi) and distributed to the people during the focus group discussions and public meetings. NGO has disseminated the relevant project information through an information campaign which was carried out during the month of March 2013. A copy of the information sharing leaflet is enclosed as Annexure-6.

Table 4: Details of RP Disclosure

S. No Name of Project Road Date of RP Disclosure

1 Kalsi-Berath Khai Motor Marg to Kaha Nehra Unaha Motor Marg 10-03-2013

2 Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha Datunu Badnu Motor Marg 10-03-2013

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg 12-03-2013

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road 13-03-2013

5 Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory(Parlichina- Magnesite Factory) 15-03-2013

10

26. Meaningful consultations with affected persons were carried out during DPR preparation and RP implementation and will be a continuing process throughout overall project implementation. Apart from APs, the consultations were held with various administrative agencies directly and indirectly involved with the sub-project implementation. The most essential action that the PWD has carried out were the consultations with people along the road corridors who suggested for the reduction on width of RoW, and asked about the compensation and the types of assistance that would be provided for those that shall be affected by the road. The best example on the outcomes produced out of the consultations was the reduction in the widths of RoWs that eventually reduced the substantial number of APs. Consultations on compensation were also held with the heads of affected households by the staff of the Project Management Unit (PMU) prior to payment of compensation. The details of consultation meetings held are given below in table-5.

Table 5: Details of Consultation Meetings

S.

No

Name of Project

Road Villages

Date of

Consultation

Participation of Community

Male Female Total

1

Kalsi-Berath Khai Motor Marg to Kaha Nehra Unaha Motor Marg

Kalsi Kaha Nehra

06-02-2013 08-02-2013 09-02-2013

16 10 15

6 8 8

22 18 23

2

Sahiya Damta –

Panuwa to Maletha

Datunu Badnu

Motor Marg

Datunu Badnu

23-02-2013 25-02-2013

8 10

4 5

12 15

3 Raitoli- Jasholi

Motor Marg

Raitoli Loli

04-03-2013 05-03-2013

21 14

14 2

35 16

4 Miyali-Jakholi

Motor Road

Miyali Jakholi

12-03-2013 14-03-2013

18 13

2 4

20 17

5

Pauri Bend -

Magnesite

Factory(Parlichina-

Magnesite

Factory)

Paldichina Joshigaon

19-03-2013 20-03-2013

17 8

15 2

32 10

3.8 PREPARATION OF MICRO PLAN AND COMPENSATION SCHEDULE

27. In accordance with updated RP and after joint verification Micro Plan was prepared by the NGO and was duly verified by the Executive Engineer of the concerned PIU and Social Expert at PMU. The approved micro plan was kept ready by PMU for disbursement in the month of June 2013. However, the actual disbursement of compensation was slightly delayed due to the overall disturbances caused to the government systems in Uttarakhand mainly because of the natural disaster occurred in the month of June 2013.

3.9 LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION FOR AFFECTED PERSONS

28. Land acquisition was unavoidable in one of the Subprojects- Raitoli-Jasholi Road in which, a total area of 4070 sq.mtr land belonging to a total number of 38 households has been affected. During the DPR preparation, the total number of affected households was identified as 11, in which one

11

account is having a a Gol-Khata4 (Joint Account), later in joint verification discovered as owned by

27 titleholders having required documents of ownership. The compensation for the affected land has been decided based on one-to-one consultation with the respective land owners, in which they have agreed upon the latest circle rate as compensation. Being this a hilly stretch and also the affected area of land for each individual land owners is minor, all the affected households agreed to the latest circle rates which are at par with market rate in the region. PIU has sent a letter to the concerned Revenue Department under reference Number 884/5C dated 05-06-2013, regarding joint inspection and finalisation of land compensation based on mutual consent. The details of land acquired in one of the sub projects are given below in Table-6.

Table 6: Details of Land Acquisition

S.

N.

Road Sub

Project

Total

Length/

Pkg No.

Total

area of

Land

Acquired

Use and type

of land

Number of

Affected

Households

Process of

Land

Acquisition

followed

District

1 Raitoli- Jasholi Road Sub Project

4.63 Kms C-11

4070 square meter

Agriculture, Un-irrigated

38 Private Negotiation

Ruderprayag

The consultation held with the affected APs reveals that there are no outstanding grievances with respect to the land acquisition or the compensation given thereof. As agreed upon by the 38 affected households, the registry of the said transaction has been done. Copy of the Registry documents after mutation has been kept in record. Value of the affected structures was assessed by the Civil Engineers of respective PIUs and NGO engaged for implementation of RPs. The valuation has followed the prevailing Circle rates as on date with depreciation. It was learnt that the Circle rates was last updated during the year 2012 and the same gets updated every two years. However, both actual cost of structure and the depreciation amount was provided to the affected households in two separate instalments following the guidelines of ADB. The receipts of second instalment are attached as Annexure-4

29. A total amount of Rs. 39, 05,611/- has been paid to 45 AHs in four respective sub-project roads. The details of the compensation paid in different sub-project roads are given in Table7. Further details of the amount of compensation disbursed for respective affected households are given in Annexure-2&3. The monitoring statement of social safeguards issues in all 89 sub-project roads is given in Annexure-5.

Table 7: Details of Compensation paid to Affected Households

Sl.

No Name of Project Road District

Length

(km)

Number

of AHs

Amount of

compensation

paid


Dehradun 7.83 2 128750.00

2 Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha Datunu Badnu Motor Marg

Dehradun 6.02 1 332500.00

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg Rudraprayag 4.64 38 3076000.00

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road Rudraprayag 8 0 0.00

5 Pauri Bend-Magnesite Factory(Parlichina- Magnesite Factory)

Bageshwar 21.9 4 368361.00

TOTAL 45 3905611.00

4 Gol-Khata essentially consists of lands where individual shares are in large number and at the same time, the respective shares are not parcelled out or demarcated, provided there is no consensus among the shareholders.

12

30. The SLAO, office Dehradun was visited to find the possibility of application of LARR in the project. It was found that the state government is still acquiring land through private negotiation for development projects and that no Government Order ( GO) has been issued so far, to form the Nodel Agency for land acquisition in the state and also the ACT is not been applied in any of the project required land acquisition in the state.

3.10 TRAINING FOR SKILL UP GRADATION AND INCOME GENERATION

31. Following the guidelines given in Resettlement Framework, the NGO has identified the areas of training in which the affected households or his/her family members could appropriately participate. Although there is no livelihood loss for any of the identified affected household, NGO has conducted trainings on various areas like (i) rearing of Angora rabbit and cultivation of wool, (ii) fodder management for milch animals, (iii) cultivation and preservation of vegetable for commercial purpose, and (iv) information regarding specific centres (district/block) from where APs/participants can obtain further training and practical workshops. Training was imparted to 49 APs/family members and details of participants are given in Table-8 below.

Table 8: Number of Participants and Villages Covered under the Training Programs

Sl.No. Sub Project No. of

APs/Participants Covered villages

1. Kalsi-Berath Khai Motor Marg to Kaha Nehra Unaha Motor Marg

6 Sahiya, Kaha, Nehra

2. Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha

Datunu Badnu Motor Marg 5 Sahiya, Damta, Badnu

3. Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg 20 Raitoli

4. Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road 8 Myali, Jakholi

5.

Pauri Bend -Magnesite

Factory(Parlichina- Magnesite

Factory)

10 Patli, Bhargaon,

Chaugaon Chhina, Bhitadi, Agar,

32. Interactive discussions with the APs/participants revealed that the trainees have good opinion about the trainings and they rated it as useful.

3.11 MINIMIZATION OF RESETTLEMENT IMPACT

33. During the preparation of Project III, as per 5 RPs, total 54 APs were found to have been affected by encroachment of RoWs and corridors were occupied by informal settlers. In order to minimize the impacts further PWD decided to strengthen the road at the minimum construction requirement. This has greatly reduced the resettlement impacts in a majority of the road sections, which in some cases, by 100%. The resettlement impacts in 5 of the 89 roads sections, is summarized in Table- 9.

Table 9: Number of Affected Household

S. No Name of Project Road

Total AHs as

per RPs (before

consultation)

AHs after

consultation &

verification

Details

No. of

households

avoided


02 02 2 NTH 00

2 Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha Datunu Badnu Motor Marg

01 01 1 NTH 00

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg 38* 38 TH 00

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road 04 00 Encroach

ers 04

5 Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory(Parlichina- Magnesite Factory)

09 04 4 NTH 05

Total 54 45

13

Note: *The DPR consultant recorded 11 affected householdss in Raitoli – Jasholi road subproject RP, out of which one land

account has many shareholders who were not traced at the time of DPR preparation. However, after verification of NGO an

additional 27 shareholders (titleholders) who were being affected had produced required documents of their ownership.

These households were found to be eligible for entitlements and compensated as per the entitlement matrix. Therefore, the

number of affected households in Raitoli- Jasholi road subproject has subsequently increased from 11 to 38.

3.12 R&R ASSISTANCE TO AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS

34. Apart from compensation to affected land or structure, resettlement assistance in the form of transitional allowance, shifting assistance, special assistance to vulnerable households, training on skill up gradation and income generation has been envisaged in the Entitlement Matrix. Following the provisions shifting assistance and assistance to vulnerable households were given apart from the evaluated cost of their affected land/assets. Training in skill up gradation and income generation were conducted by NGO in all the 5 road sub projects.

3.13 OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES

35. NGO has conducted awareness programs on HIV/AIDS in 5 sub-project locations, the details of which are given in Table-10. The photographs of the program are given in Annexure-7. Regular surveillance to avoid child labour in the sub-project road during civil works was done throughout the RP implementation.

Table 10: Details of HIV/AIDS Awareness Program

Sl.

No Name of Sub-Project Date Location

Number of

Participants


26/3/14 Sahiya 18

2 Sahiya Damta – Panuwa to Maletha

Datunu Badnu Motor Marg 26/3/14 Sahiya 15

3 Raitoli- Jasholi Motor Marg 27/3/14 Raitoli 17

4 Miyali-Jakholi Motor Road 25/3/14 Miyali 6

5 Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory 24/3/14 Bageshwar 7

3.14 COMPLIANCE TO SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS

36. The details of findings corresponding to various activities delivered under RP implementation are given in table-11.

Table 11: Details of Social Safeguard Compliances

Sl.

No.

Social Safeguard

Issues Findings Remarks

1. Ascertaining Social Impact through Joint Verification

� After verification, it was found that 9 households (4 from Mayali-Jahkoli road subproject and 5 in Pauri Bend Magnesite Factory road subproject) were encroachers and did not belong to any vulnerable category, were not considered for compensation and removed from the list of affected households.

� NGO has done appropriate consultations with these encroachers and included them in the skill up gradation/income generating training programs

2. Land Acquisition � One sub-project road [Raitoli-Jasholi] has land acquisition. A total area of 4070 sq.mtr land belonging to a total number of 38 households has been affected.

� During verification, a Gol-

Khata has been identified with 27 titleholders who were having required documents of ownership claim

14

Sl.

No.

Social Safeguard


3. Compensation � Based on latest circle rates which was agreed upon by the APs

� Circle rate is adopted from 2012 published document of Stamp Duty Department. This gets updated every two years by the GoU.

4. R&R Assistance � None of the APs are displaced from the existing location and all the affected land/structure are viable even after due impact. However, assistance to vulnerable households was given as per the entitlement matrix. All the APs were also given training on skill up gradation / income generation.

� Although the Micro Plan prepared by the NGO was approved without delay for further disbursement, the natural disaster followed by the flood in Uttarakhand, has delayed the disbursement.

5. Training for skill up gradation and income generation

� NGO has imparted skill up gradation and income generation training one each road subproject where RPs were implemented.

� The training was availed by 49 APs

6. Impact on tribal people

� The sub-project improvement has insignificant impact on tribal people

� No IPDP is required

7. Public consultation during planning and construction stage

� Meaningful consultations were done during planning stage and construction stage, which ultimately resulted in minimizing the social impacts.

� Individual consultations with APs were done with respect to compensation and resettlement assistance

8. Disclosure process followed

� Resettlement Framework along with Entitlement Matrix was translated into local language (Hindi) and distributed to the people during the focus group discussions and public meetings

9. Grievance Redress Mechanism

� NGO has played an appreciative role in the smooth implementation of RP

� No outstanding grievances reported during the construction stage or while during the monitoring. Since there were no grievances, no meeting of GRC has been conducted.

10. Institutional Arrangements

� PMU is in place to exclusively manage USRIP. Resettlement Cell headed by a Resettlement Officer in the rank EE responsible for RAP implementation. RO is assisted by Social Officer at PMU and Assistance ROs at respective PIUs. Overall RAP implementation is carried out by a hired NGO, namely HIFEED.

� Resettlement Cell with support from Social Officer and AROs at PIU level, regularly monitored the RAP implementation

� Joint site verification, preparation of Micro Plan, disbursement of payments were done with due adherence to the agreed Resettlement Framework.

11. Other social issues � NGO has conducted awareness programs on HIV/AIDS and

� Total 63 participants were benefited.

15

Sl.

No.

Social Safeguard


surveillance to avoid child labour was done along all the 5 sub-project roads throughout the RP implementation.

� HIV/AIDS awareness program was conducted in 5 sub-project locations

37. Overall, the implementation of RP was carried out systematically by the PMU/PWD, with the facilitation of NGO- HIFEED. The entire exercise followed the ADB Social Safeguard Policies and Procedures. While, the negative impacts were minimised in some of the road sub projects by way of adjusting road width, the affected households on the other hand, were duly compensated through negotiated prices with prior consultation. The affected persons were found informed, aware and positive to the project activities. This was again revealed through the grievance redressal cell which received not a single grievance throughout the RP implementation. The information dissemination about the disbursement and overall RP implementation process was time bound and effective.

3.15 EFFECTIVENESS OF RP IMPLEMENTATION

38. The RP was implemented as per the approved Resettlement Framework of ADB, where various other assistances were also provided to vulnerable household as per the entitlement matrix. The affected households expressed their satisfaction towards restoration of living standards mainly in terms of assistance given for the partial loss of structure.

39. The training on income generation and awareness on HIV/AIDS was found useful by affected households and persons on the all road sub projects.

3.16 LESSON LEARNED

40. Generally, cost of a structure is calculated by deducting the depreciation amount. The older the structure the less will be its cost. The practice was also followed in this project by valuation committee of PWD and hence, Ist instalment of payment was made to affected households after deducting depreciation cost of the structures. The affected households had no grievances regarding this, however, keeping the ADB policy guidelines the PMU decided to pay again the depreciation amount to all affected households and this was highly appreciated by the all. According to APs, they could now utilize the second instalment in a better way.

16

ANNEXURE-1

Entitlement Matrix

S.

No.

Type of Loss Unit of

Entitlement

Entitlement Details

A. LOSS OF LAND AND ASSET

1 Loss of Agricultural Land and assets

a) Titleholder b) DPs with

customary land right

c) Permit from local authority

• Compensation at replacement value

• Resettlement Assistance

• Transitional allowance

• Special provision for vulnerable group

a) Compensation will be paid as per the LAA act.

b) If the compensation determined by the competent Authority/DC as per LAA is less than the replacement value “then the difference is to assistance.

c) If the residual plot (s) is (are) not viable, i.e. the AP becomes a marginal farmer, any of the following three options are to be given to the AP, Subject to his acceptance :

* The AP remains on the plot , and the compensation and assistance paid to the tune of required amount of land to be acquired. * Compensation and assistance are to a be provided for the entire plot including residual part, if the owner of such land wisher that his residual plot should the EA will acquired by the EA, the EA will acquire the residual plot and pay the compensation for it. * If AP is from vulnerable group, compensation for the entire land by means of land for land will be provided if AP wishes so, provided that the land of equal or more productive value is available. d) Transitional allowance of

Rs. 3000/- per month for 6 months if the residual land is viable. This will be calculated by prevalent daily wage rate.

e) All fees, stamp duties, taxes and other charges, as applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in the relocation and rehabilitation process, are to be borne by the EA.

S. Type of Loss Unit of Entitlement Details

17

No. Entitlement

2 Loss of non-agricultural land (i.e. homestead and residential structures)

a)Titleholder/ Owner (Residential land and structure) b) Permits from local authority

• Compensation at replacement value


• Transition allowance

• Shifting assistance

a) Compensation for land and structure will be paid as per LA act. b) If replacement cost for land and structure is more than the compensation determined by the competent Authority/DC then difference is to be paid by the EA in the form of “assistance”. c) Replacement value for residential structure (part or full). Which will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule of rates (BSR) without depreciation, subject to relevant “quality standards “of BSR as maintained by Govt./Local Body. d) Transitional assistance of Rs. 3000/- per month in te form of grant to cover a maximum nine months rental accommodation. e) A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs. 1500 to 2500/- depending on the type of structure and extent of impact. f) Right to salvage material from demolished structure and frontage etc. g) Project assisted relocation option will be provided to those whose residential structures becomes non-livable as a result of Project impacts and a relocation site will be developed in consultation with these affected households (subject to availability of land)

S.

No.


Entitlement

Entitlement Details

3 Loss of non-agricultural land (i.e. loss of Commercial land and structures)

a)Titleholder/ Owner (Residential land and structure) b) DPs with customary land righy c)Permits from local authority

• Compensation at market rate or replacement value


• Transition allowance


a) Compensation loss of and structure will be paid at the replacement value. b) If replacement cost for land and structure is more then the compensation determined by the competent Authority, then difference is to be paid by the Ea in the form of “assistance”. c) AP will be provided replacement cost of the

18

commercial structure (part or full), which will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule of rates (BSR) without depreciation, subject to relevant “quality standrads “ of BSR as maintained by Govt./Local Bodies. d) Transition assistance of Rs. 3000/- per month in the form of grant for maximum period of nine months. e) A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs. 1500 to 2500/- depending on the type of structure and extent of impact. f) Right to salvage material from demolished structure and frontage etc. g) Training would be provided for up gradation of skills. h) Project assisted relocation option will be provided to those commercial structures can no longer be used as a commercial enterprise as a result of the project and a relocation site will be developed in consultation with these affected in consultation with these affected households (subject to availability of land)

S.

No.


Entitlement

Entitlement Details

4 Loss of Residential Tenancy

Residential Tenants • Relocation Assistance

• Compensation


a) The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the tenant of the landlord or the remaining amount at the time of expropriation. (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord). b) A sum equal to 3 months rental or Rs 300/- per month, whichever is lesser in consideration of the disruption caused. c) Compensation for any structure that tenant has erected on the property )This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord) d) A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.1500 to 2500/- depending on the type of

19

structure and extent of impact.

5 Loss of Commercial Tenancy

Commercial Tenants

• Relocation Assistance

• Compensation

• Shifting Assistance

a) The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the tenant to the landlord or the remaining amount at the time of expropriation. (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord.) b) A sum equal to 3 Months, rental or Rs 3000/- per month, whichever is lesser in consideration of the disruption caused. c) Compensation for any structure the tenant has erected on the property (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord)

S.

No.


Entitlement

Entitlement Details

d) A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs. 1500 to 2500/- depending on the type of structure and the extent of Impact.

A. LOSS OF LIVE LIHOOD OF TITLEHOLDERS

6 Loss of wage earnings a) employ in SBEs b) agricultural laborer/share croppers

• Assistance

a) This is valid for persons indirectly affected due to their employer being displaced .Assistance is to be paid on a case by case basis, as per the prevailing local wage rates for 100 days. b) Employment opportunity for DPs in the road construction work if desired so by them.

7 Income from non-perennial crops and trees

Household • Notice to harvest standing crops

• Compensation of standing crops

a) Advance notice to DPs to harvest their crops. b) In case of standing crops, cash compensation at current market value. c) Grant fro replacement of seeds for the next season’s harvest towards loss of crops before harvest due to forced relocation. d) Trees will be compensated as per prevailing rate of Forest Department.

8 Perennial crops such as fruit tress

Household Compensation at “market value”

a) Advance notice to DPs to harvest their crops and fruits. b) Compensation for perennial croup and trees calculated as annual produce value for at least 3 seasons.

20

c) Grant for replacement of seeds for the next sedation’s harvest towards loss of crops before harvest due to forced relocation. d) Trees will be compensated as per prevailing rate of forest Department.

S. No. Type of Loss Unit of

Entitlement

Entitlement Details

C. LOSSES OF NON-TITLEHOLDESS

9 Loss of agricultural land, residential and commercial structure by encroachers

Households who have illegally extended their legally owned land /property onto public or other private land

• No compensation for land

• Compensation for structures to only vulnerable household

• Shifting assistance for vulnerable encroachers

• R&R Assistance only to vulnerable households.

• Right to salvage materials

a) Encroachers will be notified and given a time in which they will be required to remove their assets and harvest their crops. b) Compensation for structures at replacement cost to the vulnerable households. c) Training would be provided for up gradation of skills to the DPS belonging to vulnerable groups and loosing their commercial structures. d) Shifting allowance of Rs. 1500 TO 2500/-lump sum for shifting depending on the type of structure and extent of impact. e) Right to salvage materials from the demolished structure.

10 Loss of residential and commercial structure by squatters/informal settlers

Households living /earning their livelihood by illegally occupying public or private land.

• No compensation for land

• Compensation for structures.


• .R &R Assistance

• Right to salvage materials

a) Compensation for loss of structure at replacement cost. b) A lump sum shifting amount of Rs. 1500 to Rs 2500 depending on the type of structure. c) Squatters/Informal settlers will be notified and given a time in which they will be required to remove their assets. d) Transitional allowance of Rs. 3000 for a period of 3 t o a maximum of 6 months depending on the extent of impact. e) Training would be provided for up gradation on skills to the DPs loosing their commercial structures. f) Right to salvage material from the demolished structure. g) Project assisted relocation option will be provided to

21

those whose residential/commercial structures become non-livable as a result of project –impacts and relocation site will be developed in consultation with these affected households (subject to availability of land)

S. No. Type of Loss Unit of

Entitlement

Entitlement Details

11 Shifting Business –Mobile Vendors

Households Not eligible for compensation or “assistance”

Ambulatory vendors who have been granted license for operating will be considered as kiosk.

12 Kiosks Household “Assistance for business disruption

Vendors who have been granted license for operating from a fixed. Location will be considered as kiosk. Assistance will be paid as one time lump sum amount of Rs 3000.

D. ADDITIONAL SUPPORT TO VULNERABLE GROUP

13 Prime source of income

Vulnerable households including BPL,SC,ST,WHH, disabled and elderly

Additional assistance to vulnerable groups

One time lump sum assistance of Rs. 5000/- to vulnerable households. This will be above and over the other assistance (s) as per this framework.

E. LOSS OF COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE /COMMON PROPERTY RESOURES

14 Common Property Resources

Community Compensatory Replacement

Cash compensation or reconstruction of the community structure in consultation with the community.

22

ANNEXURE-2

Details of Land Compensation given to Affected Title holders

Raitoli-Jasholi Road Subproject

Sl. No. Name of APs

Social

Category/

Vulnerability

Land

acquired

(in ha.)

Cheque/

D.D.No.

Date of

Payment Amount

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Sh. Dharm Singh S/o Sh. Alam Singh

Gen 0.002 074884 28.12.2013 17000.00

2 Sh. Beer Singh S/o Sh. Dilip singh Gen 0.006 074883 28.12.2013 54000.00

3 Sh. Ranjeet Singh S/o Sh. Kalam Singh Gen/BPL 0.005 074880 28.12.2013 49500.00

4 Sh. Sardar Singh S/o Sh. Darban Singh Gen/ BPL 0.004 074881 28.12.2013 36000.00

5 Sh. Gajendra Singh S/o Sh. Raghunath Singh Gen 0.023 074882 28.12.2013 195500.00

6 Sh. Sher Singh S/o Sh. Mohan Singh Gen 0.02 074893 28.12.2013 170000.00

7 Sh. Darshan Singh S/o Sh. Darban Singh Gen 0.01 074886 28.12.2013 75000.00

8 Smt. Anshi Devi W/o Sh. Balbeer Singh Gen/WHH 0.013 074878 28.12.2013 92300.00

9 Sh. Sheeshpal Singh S/o Sh. Raghunath Singh Gen 0.001 074876 28.12.2013 9000.00

10 Sh. Bharat Singh S/o Sh. Govind Singh Gen/ PH 0.001 074877 28.12.2013 9000.00

11 Smt. Anshi Devi W/o Sh. Balbeer Singh Gen/ WHH 0.006 074878 28.12.2013 69000.00

12 Sh. Sanjay Singh S/o Sh. Mahendra Singh Gen 0.019 074879 28.12.2013 171000.00

13 Sh. Kalam Singh S/o Sh Ram Singh Gen 0.001 074892 30.12.2013 8500.00

14 Sh. Kushal singh S/o Sh. Kirpal Singh Gen 0.005 074887 30.12.2013 45000.00

15 Sh. Sardar Singh S/o Sh. Darban Singh Gen/BPL 0.003 074888 30.12.2013 27000.00

16 Sh. Kalam Singh S/o Sh Vijay Singh Gen 0.007 051252 28.03.2014 49700.00

17 Sh. Murli Singh S/o Sh. Guman Singh Gen 0.01 051250 28.03.2014 71000.00

18 Sh. Muli Singh S/o Sh Aaalam Singh Gen 0.045 051197 28.03.2014 319500.00

19 Sh. Girish Singh S/o Sh. Shauna Singh Gen 0.007 051195 28.03.2014 49700.00

20 Sh. Jitar Singh S/o Sh. Shyalak Singh Gen 0.005 051790 28.03.2014 35500.00

23

21 Sh. Balbeer Singh S/o Sh Shiv Singh Gen 0.003 051254 28.03.2014 21300.00

22 Sh. Avtar Singh S/o Sh Makar Singh Gen 0.019 051257 28.03.2014 134900.00

23 Sh. Ranjeet Singh S/o Sh. Kalam Singh Gen/ BPL 0.005 051791 28.03.2014 35500.00

24 Sh.Sardar Singh S/o Sh. Darbaan Singh Gen/BPL 0.009 051792 28.03.2014 63900.00

25 Sh. Madan Singh S/o Sh. Avtar Singh Gen 0.01 051251 28.03.2014 71000.00

26 Sh. Raghuveer Singh S/o Sh. Monu Singh Gen 0.008 051253 28.03.2014 56800.00

27 Sh. Mastan Singh S/o Sh. Jodh Singh Gen 0.013 051796 13.06.2014 117000.00

28 Smt. Shubhadra Devi W/o Sh. Nattha Singh Gen/WHH 0.002 051789 13.06.2014 14200.00

29 Sh. Ravindra Singh S/o Sh. Kuwar Singh Gen 0.003 051792 13.06.2014 21300.00

30 Sh. Ashok Singh S/o Sh. Rajendra Singh Gen 0.002 051793 13.06.2014 21300.00

31 Sh. Virendra Singh S/o Sh. Prem Singh Gen 0.009 052122 13.06.2014 63900.00

32 Sh. Mastan Singh S/o Sh. Mohan Singh Gen/ BPL 0.008 051796 13.06.2014 56800.00

33 Sh. Nattha Singh S/o Sh. Pratap Singh Gen 0.013 051793 13.06.2014 92300.00

34 Sh. Prakash Singh S/o Sh. Birbal Singh Gen 0.02 05179 13.06.2014 142000.00

35 Sh. Sanjay Singh S/o Sh. Mahendra Singh Gen 0.012 051799 13.06.2014 85200.00

36 Sh. Rajendra Singh S/o Sh. Shitab Singh Gen 0.023

051800/ 051802

13.06.2014 163300.00

37 Sh. Raghuveer Singh S/o Sh. Paulyasingh Gen 0.047 051801 13.06.2014 305300.00

38 Sh. Jaman Singh S/o Sh. Guman Singh Gen 0.008 051795 13.06.2014 56800.00

Total 0.407 3076000.00

24

ANNEXURE-3

Details of Payment to Non Titleholders (NTH)

ABSTRACT OF MICRO PLAN FOR NON TITLEHOLDERS PAFs

S.

N.

Head of

Affected

Household

Category of NTH Social

Category Status of Vulnerability

Total Cost

Evaluated for

Structure (A)

Depreciati

on cost

(B)

Actual Cost

for

Structure

(A-B)

Shifting

Assistance

Assistance

for

Vulnerability

Amount

of

Compensa

tion

Assistance

Paid

(1st

Instalmen

t)

Amount of

Compensation

Assistance

Paid (2nd

Instalment)

Total Amount of

Compensation

Assistance paid

to APs

En

cro

sqa

tt

Ten

an

t

Gen

OB

C

SC

/ST

BP

L

WH

H

PH

SC

ST

1. Pauri Bend -Magnesite Factory Road Sub Project

1 Gopal Ram 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6181 0 6181 0 5000 11181 0 11181

2 Haruli Devi 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 25500 6655 18845 0 5000 23845 6655 30500

3 Pratima Devi 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 220440 63234 157206 2500 5000 164706 63234 227940

4 Pradeep Janoti

1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 91240 23888 67352 2500 5000 74852 23888 98740

2. Kalsi Beratt Khai-Kaha Nehra Una Road Sub Project

5 Kunwar Singh

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

113750

3867 53007 2500 5000 60507 3867 64374

6 Khajan Singh 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3868 53008 2500 5000 60508 3868 64376

3. Sahiya Damta Panuwa Datnu Badnu Road Subproject

7 Jagat Singh 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 325000 22100 302900 2500 5000 310400 22100 332500

TOTAL 7 0 0 3 0 4 1 2 0 1 3 782111 123612 658499 12500 35000 705999 123612 829611

25

ANNEXURE-4

Receipts of Depreciation Amount of Structures Paid to NTHs in 2nd

Instalment

31

ANNEXURE-5

Monitoring Statement of Social Safeguards Issues in 89 Sub-Project Roads

Package No. Sl.No Name of Road Category District Road Length

(km)

Monitoring of social Safeguards

C-1

1 Bajpur-Beriadaulat VR

US Nagar

7.69

No Social issue

2 Rampukazi-Beria-Daulat ODR 10.91

3 Bajpur-Janginala VR 8.43

4 Bajpur Inspection House VR 8.21

5 Hawana-Birha-Bhaisiya Chakarpur

Janglat Chauki VR 6.97

6 Bejhkheri-Inamkarakajpura VR 9.01

7 Keshowala to Belpdav ODR 9.02

8 Reheta-Singhali ODR 5.81

9 Kashipur Dhakia to Kharmasa VR 14.96

10 Jetpur to Barkhedi VR/LVR 5.25

11 Jaspur Kaliawala VR 2

C-2

12 Sardarnagar to Bannakhera VR/LVR 26.88

No Social issue

13 Masit to Sekania VR 5.37

14 Nagla-Lalpur VR/LVR 9.64

15 Gadarpur to Gularbhoj VR/LVR 9.57

16 Gularbhoj to Rosapur VR/LVR 5.33

17 Chakarpur – Magargaon Paliga –

Bira Bagh VR 5.42

18 NH-74 Km 239 (Sirsa Mor) Camp

road to Shakti Farm VR 22.02

C-3 19 Unchapul to Lamachor ODR Nainital 7.62 No Social issue

32

20 Chandni Chowk -Prempur -Lusiyani VR/LVR 6.63

21 Kanwal Band -Dholi Gaon to Kanol VR/LVR 14.04

22 Mornola Monjhola VR 23.86

23 Simliya Band to Sanani (LVR) VR/LVR 10.38

24 Nathua Khan – Hartola – Jarasi VR 17.03

C-4

25 Siuni - Silore Mahadev ODR

Almora

20.23

No Social issue

26 Bhikiyasain Vinayak ODR 14.812

27 Bhikiyasain-Jeenapani VR 5.118

28 Jenal- Dotiyal ODR 20.072

29 Jenal-Deghat ODR 29.801

30 Ranikhet- Jalali-Masi ODR 61.575

31 Chitai - Petshal-Bhetandagi VR/LVR 7.84

32 Patlibagad to Mamarchina-

Gananath ODR 8.007

33 Dwaraghat - Binta ODR 10.366

34 Dwarahat Dunagiri ODR 18.915

35 Dwarahat - Bimadeshwar ODR 18.522

36 Dhauladevi - Kheti ODR 10.026

37 Someshwar- Gerechina ODR 10.088

38 Sheetalakhet -Khunt ODR 12.936

39 Majhkhali-Someshwar ODR 23.11

CP-05 40

Bageshwar to Dafot ODR

Bageshwar

15.172 No social issue

41 Pauri-Bend (Parlichina ) Megnesite

Factory ODR 21.96

Compensated four affected

households Rs 368361.00

CP-06 42

Liti Market to Liti Village ODR 5.001 No social issue

43 Bhani to Ritawagadh to

Harsinghiyabargadh to Vinayak ODR 7.542 No social issue

33

44 Sama to Liti Village ODR 10.805 No social issue

45 Bageshwar to Kapkote (Chainage from Km. 0+000 to Km. 8+500)

MDR 8.5 No social issue

CP-07

46 Bans to Amlaghat ODR

Pithoragarh


47 Sandev to Muwani VR 20.115

No social issue

48 Raigar to Singoli (Satsilling to

Singoli) VR 14.79 No social issue

49 Chandak to Bans (Pithoragarh to

Bans) ODR 13.428 No social issue

CP-08 50

Satsilling to Thal ODR 49.609 No social issue

CP-09 51

Sukhidang to Shyamlatal VR Champawat 5.34 No social issue

P-10

52 Birahi - Gona

VR

Chamoli


53 Karanpryag-Nati-Kirsal

VR 9.300 No social issue

54 Bungidhar-Mahalchauri-Talvadi

ODR 6.300 No social issue

55 Pokhari-Gopeshwar

ODR 5.800 No social issue

CP-11

56 Mundoli-Vaan

VR 5.000

This road subproject is deleted from the scope of USRIP-III

57 Makku Sampark Marg

VR

Rudraprayag


58 *Mayali-Jakholi

VR 8.000

RP was prepared by the DPR consultant, but during verification no impact was ascertained.

59 Tilwara-Bhardar -Sorakhal

VR 5.500 No social issue

34

60 **Raitoli-Jaisoli

VR 4.629

38 APs/30,76,000.00 Gol- Khata

CP-12

61 Rampur Shyampur Bamana

VR/LVR

Tehri


62 Nainbagh- Aindy ODR 10.000 No social issue

63 Sulya-Ramgaon VR 6.055 No social issue

64 Kamand-Tholdhar VR 7.400 No social issue

65 Chambal-Ranchori-Dandachalli VR 8.876 No social issue

CP-13

66 Sirkotkhal – Kapchun - Rithakhal VR

Pauri


67 Pokhara – Baijro VR 8.200 No social issue

68 Chaupriyal - Bishald VR 5.676 No social issue

69 Pabo – Damdeval VR 5.100 No social issue

70 Chipalghat – Pithani - Gindokhal VR 5.400 No social issue

CP-14

71 Nalikhan – Paukharikhet VR

Pauri


72 Dotyal – Basada ODR 9.600 No social issue

73 Kotdwar – Pulinda VR 7.600 No social issue

CP-15

74 Gyansu - Sald - Uprikot VR

Uttarkashi

11.06

No Social issue 75

Maneri - Jakhol VR 7.305

76 Dunda - Fold ODR

21.3

77 Dhontri-Thandi VR

7.3

35

CP-16 78

Purola - Jarmola - Mori ODR 11.87

79 Naugaon - Panti - Rajghari VR

5.183

CP-17

80 Kotigram-Sardi VR/LVR

Dehradun


81 Ubhahu - Qiari Kuchta VR

15.13 No Social issue

82 Langha - Toli VR

5.81

83 Kalsi-Beratt Khai to Kaha - Nehra –

Unaha VR

7.83

Compensated two affected households with Rs 1,28,750.00

84

Nanda Ki Chowki - Kotra Santoor Phalsiyani Aamwala

VR 11.75

No Social issue

85 Sahia-Kuanu ODR

5.09 No Social issue

86 Km 4 Sahiya-Damta-Panua - Badnu VR

6.024

Compensated one affected household with Rs 332500.00

CP-18

87 Chakrata Lakhamandal ODR

40

No Social issue 88

Lalpul-Bishnoi VR/LVR 6.653

89 Lohanband- Bhavdidhar (LVR) VR/LVR

10.46

36

ANNEXURE-6

44

ANNEXURE-6

Photographs : Training Program and HIV/AIDS Awareness Program

uttarakhand state-road investment program - tranche 3 · uttarakhand state-road investment program...

Documents