utility and services enabling works - … east - review... · document controls title utility and...

UTILITY AND SERVICES

ENABLING WORKS

Addendum 2 to review of environmental factors OCTOBER 2016

(blank page)

Prepared by: CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture

Roads and Maritime Services

WestConnex M4 East project

Utility and Services Enabling Works

Addendum to review of environmental factors October 2016

Document controls

Title Utility and Services Enabling Works addendum to review of environmental factors for an extension for laydown area

Approval and authorisation

Prepared by: CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture

Accepted on behalf of Roads and Maritime by:

Name:

Date:

Location File name

Document status Date

Initial draft 25/08/2016

Reviewing register

Review version Issued by Issued for Date of issue

Draft A CSJ Review 26/08/2016

Rev 0 CSJ Approval 30/08/2016

Rev 1 CSJ Approval 10/10/2016

Utility and Services Enabling Works ii

Addendum 2 to Review of Environmental Factors

Contents

1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Proposal identification ....................................................................................... 1

1.2 Purpose of the report ........................................................................................ 1

1.3 Background ...................................................................................................... 2

2 Description of the proposed change ....................................................................... 3

2.1 The proposed change ........................................................................................ 3

3 Statutory and planning framework .......................................................................... 7

3.1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ..................................................... 7

3.2 State Environmental Planning Policies .................................................................. 7

3.3 Local Environmental Plans .................................................................................. 8

4 Environmental assessment ..................................................................................... 9

4.1 Applicable environmental factors ........................................................................ 9

4.2 Summary of beneficial and adverse effects .......................................................... 11

5 Environmental management ................................................................................. 13

6 Justification and conclusion .................................................................................. 14

7 Certification ....................................................................................................... 15

8 References ......................................................................................................... 16

Appendices

Appendix A Consideration of clause 228(2) factors and matters of national environmental significance

Appendix B Environmental Constraints Map

Utility and Services Enabling Works 1


1 Introduction

1.1 Proposal identification

Roads and Maritime Services (Roads and Maritime) is undertaking works to adjust, relocate and / or protect existing utility services and install new utilities infrastructure to facilitate the construction of the WestConnex M4 East project. These activities were addressed in the Utilities and Services Enabling Works Review of Environmental Factors (the original REF, RMS January 2016). The proposed adjustment, which is the subject of this addendum, is the application for extension of the use of the laydown area off Queen Lane, North Strathfield. The submission for the use of this laydown area was addressed in the REF Addendum Utility Works (addendum 1 REF, RMS 2016), determined 1 April 2016. This addendum 2 REF should be read in conjunction with the original REF, as well as the addendum 1 REF. The location of the laydown area is generally bounded by Queen Street, Sydney Street and Queen Lane in North Strathfield, and is shown in Figure 1. The laydown area is within the Canada Bay Local Government Area (LGA).

1.2 Purpose of the report

The laydown area has been used to enable access to material and equipment for the utility works assessed and approved under the original REF. The purpose of this addendum 2 REF is to extend the timeframe for the use of the laydown area for five months (to early 2017), and document any likely impacts of the proposed change, and to detail any additional protective measures to be implemented. This addendum 2 REF has been prepared by CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture (CSJ) on behalf of Roads and Maritime. For the purposes of these works, Roads and Maritime is the proponent and the determining authority under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). The description of the proposed change and associated environmental impacts have been undertaken in the context of clause 228 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), the Fisheries Management Act 1994 (FM Act), and the Australian Government’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). In doing so, the addendum 2 REF helps to fulfil the requirements of section 111 of the EP&A Act, which provides that Roads and Maritime Services is to examine and take into account to the fullest extent possible, all matters affecting or likely to affect the environment by reason of the activity. The findings of the addendum 2 REF would be considered when assessing:

Whether the proposed change is likely to result in a significant impact on the environment and therefore the necessity for an environmental impact statement to be prepared and approval to be sought from the Minister for Planning under Part 5.1 of the EP&A Act.

The significance of any impact on threatened species as defined by the TSC Act and/or FM Act, in section 5A of the EP&A Act and therefore the requirement for a Species Impact Statement.



The significance of any impact on nationally listed biodiversity matters under the EPBC Act, including whether there is a real possibility that the activity may threaten long-term survival of these matters, and whether offsets are required and able to be secured.

The potential for the proposed change to significantly impact any other matters of national environmental significance or Commonwealth land and therefore the need to make a referral to the Australian Government Department of the Environment for a decision by the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment on whether assessment and approval is required under the EPBC Act.

1.3 Background

The addendum 1 REF was determined on 1 April 2016 to enable the utilisation of the laydown area. As described in the original REF, Roads and Maritime proposed to conduct adjustments to, relocation of and protection of existing utility services and installation of new utilities infrastructure to facilitate the WestConnex M4 East project. The service and utility works are essential preparatory works to enable the construction and operation of the M4 East project.



2 Description of the proposed change

CPB Samsung John Holland JV, on behalf of Roads and Maritime, is conducting adjustments to, relocating, and protecting existing utility services and installation of new utilities infrastructure to enable the M4 East project. This section describes the proposed change - an extension for the use of the established laydown area between Queen Street and Sydney Street, North Strathfield.

2.1 The proposed change

To facilitate the utility and services enabling works, a laydown area has been established off Queen Lane, North Strathfield. The laydown area enables access to material and equipment required for the utilities works assessed and approved under the original REF. Utility ID No AGTP2, AGTP3, WW060 and WW070 (see Table 1) are not complete. As the laydown area is central to these utility works, and there is limited space within the construction boundary, keeping the laydown area for approximately a further five months (to early 2017) would be beneficial to ensuring the utility works can be completed without encroaching on the already restricted space within the construction footprint for equipment to enable the completion of utility works. As the utility works are generally undertaken within the road reserve, which are generally narrow in this area, the use of the laydown area will minimise potential traffic and access impacts associated with the utility works. The land on which the laydown area is located is owned by Roads and Maritime and is an irregular shaped property, approximately 25 m in length and 20 m in width at the longest and widest spots, respectively. The area is generally bounded by Queen Street, Sydney Street and Queen Lane in North Strathfield, and a row of large mature trees adjacent to the residential house at 13A Queen Lane. Access to the site is via an established gate off of Queen Lane. The laydown area would be utilised for the materials to enable utility and services works, such as plastic conduits and frames, associated sundries for use in the conduit laying, a small container (approximately 6 m in length) to store hand tools and small power tools associated with running the conduits. A portable toilet is also included within the area. Temporary fencing is installed around the laydown area. All necessary signage advising the general public of access restrictions has been provided. Use of the laydown area is primarily limited to standard daytime construction hours as follows: Monday to Friday: 7am to 6pm

Saturday: 8am to 1pm

Sunday and public holidays: No work.

However, it is noted that some works may require night works, and therefore access to the site may be required. Access to the laydown area would primarily be at the beginning (approximately 8-9pm) and the end (approximately 6am) of the night shift. A noise assessment prepared for night-time access indicated that impacts would exceed the noise management level (NML) at the nearest receiver. Access to the site would be limited to three consecutive evenings or nights in a calendar week and not



more than four evenings or nights in a calendar week. Validation monitoring would be undertaken during representative works to confirm the predicted impacts. Upon completion of works, the laydown area would be demobilised, all rubbish and materials would be removed from site and the area would be rehabilitated to a state consistent with its current land use. No tree removal would be required as part of the proposed change.



Table 1: Utilities approved under the original REF that have not yet been completed

Dwg ID No Site Service Service Provider

Nearest Cross Street (Major)

Service Type and Size

Task Works Length of Adjustment

AG TP2 Wattle Street Power Ausgrid Northcote Site 1 x 4MVA

1 x 5MVA

Provide temporary power supply (11kV) to Northcote site compound. Trenching along Parramatta Road from Wolsley Rd and up Wattle St

Installation 407

AG TP3 Wattle Street Power Ausgrid Wolsley Site 1 x 3MVA Provide temporary power supply (11kV) to ventilation building site compound. Trenching along Parramatta Rd from Wolsley Rd and up Wattle St

Installation 70

WW060 Homebush Bay

Sewer SWC-Sewer

M4 Disused Sewer

Remove sewer through cut/ cover location. Diversion will be trenched

with local excavation at tie-ins

Relocate 0

WW070d Homebush Bay

Sewer SWC-Sewer

M4 Disused Sewer

Remove sewer through cut/ cover location. Diversion will be trenched

with local excavation at tie-ins

Relocate 0



Figure 1 – Laydown area location off Queen Lane, North Strathfield



3 Statutory and planning framework

3.1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Environmental assessment of the proposal is undertaken under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). All matters affecting or likely to affect the environment as a result of the proposal are considered in this REF.

3.2 State Environmental Planning Policies

3.2.1 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 (ISEPP) aims to facilitate the effective delivery of infrastructure across the State. Clause 94 of ISEPP permits development on any land for the purpose of a road or road infrastructure facilities to be carried out by or on behalf of a public authority without consent. As the proposed change is for a road or road infrastructure facility and is to be carried out on behalf of Roads and Maritime Services, it can be assessed under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Development consent from council is not required. The proposed change is not located on land reserved under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and does not affect land or development regulated by State Environmental Planning Policy No. 14 - Coastal Wetlands, State Environmental Planning Policy No. 26 - Littoral Rainforests, or State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Development) 2005. Part 2 of the ISEPP contains provisions for public authorities to consult with local councils and other public authorities prior to the commencement of certain types of development. No additional consultation would be required as a result of the proposed change.

3.2.2 State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011

State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 (SRD SEPP) aims to identify development that is State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure. The WestConnex M4 East project has been declared critical State significant infrastructure (critical SSI) by Schedule 5, Clause 4(3) of the SRD SEPP. Clause 4(7) of the same Schedule excludes specific activities from the definition of development. In this clause: development does not include the following:

(a) surveys, test drilling, test excavations, geotechnical investigations or other tests, surveys, sampling or investigation for the purposes of the design or assessment of a project,

(b) in the case of the M4 East project, - any of the following undertaken prior to the commencement of the construction of the new multi-lane road:



(i) adjustments to, or relocation of, existing utilities infrastructure and installation of new utilities infrastructure,

(ii) the establishment of construction compounds including the erection of temporary buildings and the provision of associated facilities including access roads and car parks.

Consequently, works associated with the original REF were able to be commenced prior to the approval of the M4 East project, as it is specifically excluded from the description of the development in the SRD SEPP. The proposed change supports the works commenced under the original REF.

3.3 Local Environmental Plans

The proposed works are located within Canada Bay LGA. Development on the proposed area would be subject to the Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2010. However, as identified in Section 3.2.1, consent from council is not required in accordance with ISEPP.



4 Environmental assessment

This section of the addendum 2 REF provides a description of the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed change. The existing environment is generally consistent with the existing environment described in the original REF. The proposed laydown area is located between Queen Street and Sydney Street, North Strathfield. Aspects of the environment potentially impacted upon by the proposed change are considered. This includes consideration of the factors specified in the guidelines Roads and Related Facilities (DUAP) and Is an EIS required? (DUAP 1999) as required under clause 228(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. The factors specified in clause 228(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 are also considered in Appendix A. Any additional site-specific mitigation and management measures are identified to minimise potential impacts. These management measures would be undertaken in combination with those identified in the original REF (Table 29).

4.1 Applicable environmental factors

Table 2 – Identification of relevant environmental factors

Environmental factors

Comments Additional management

measures

Traffic and parking

Access to the proposed laydown area is from Queen Street, a one way street running south to meet up with Sydney Street.

Use of the laydown area would result in the short term increase in construction vehicle traffic to/from the proposed laydown area. Light vehicles are expected to enter the site, load up with materials and exit the site. Use of the site would primarily be at the commencement and completion of each shift.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential traffic and parking impacts.

Noise and vibration

Transport noise is generally the primary contributor to background noise levels, largely due to the presence of the M4 Motorway and the Main North Line. A Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement has been prepared for the original REF, which identifies recommended management measures for the approved utilities works.

Use of the proposed laydown area would generate some additional noise impacts that may affect nearby sensitive receivers. Noise would be associated with the arrival / departure of vehicles and loading / unloading of materials and tools. The useable area of the proposed site is at least 15 m from the edge of the nearest residential receiver, which is separated by some mature tree screening.

Access to the laydown area would generally be during standard daytime construction hours. If access to the laydown area is required during night works, would be limited to the beginning and the end of the shift where practicable.

Space permitting, the site would be arranged to use the shipping container as shielding or to locate material as far from residential receivers as possible.

Access to the site would be limited to three consecutive evenings or nights in a calendar week and a total of four evenings or nights in a calendar week.

Validation monitoring would be undertaken to confirm impacts predicted in the noise assessment for the works.





measures

Flora and fauna Vegetation in the area is not mapped within the OEH (2013) vegetation mapping, nor within the mapping prepared for the M4 East project (refer Annexure B). No threatened ecological communities (TECs) or endangered ecological communities (EECs) listed under the TSC Act are mapped within the proposed laydown area. The M4 East environmental impact statement (EIS) identified that no threatened flora species native to the area were recorded or considered likely to occur within the M4 East project footprint or its surrounds.

No vegetation removal is expected for use of the proposed laydown area. Minor branch trimming / pruning may be required to enable vehicle access.

Laydown of materials / storage container would be on top of planted grasses.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential flora and fauna impacts.

Soils, water and contamination

No excavation works would be required for use of the proposed laydown area. Further, the area is located within an area with a low risk of contamination. The works are unlikely to impact on surface water, soils or contamination.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential soils, water and contamination impacts.

Non-Aboriginal heritage

The proposed laydown is located across from the Powells Estate Heritage Conservation Area (HCA). Use of the proposed laydown area may result in the short term impact on visual amenity from the edge of the HCA, particularly 39 Sydney Street, which faces the proposed laydown area. Some vegetation screening is located within the property’s boundary and within the proposed laydown area.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential non-Aboriginal heritage impacts.

Aboriginal heritage

A Stage 2 PACHCI Aboriginal heritage assessment was undertaken for the potential M4 East project, which found that the project would not impact on any known Aboriginal objects or places. Due to the disturbed nature of the site and the distance to known and potential Aboriginal heritage objects or places identified in the M4 East assessment (included in the M4 East EIS (AECOM GHD 2015), no impact on Aboriginal heritage is expected to occur as a result of the works.

N/A

Air quality The use of the proposed laydown area is not expected to improve or worsen the potential impacts to air quality identified in the original REF.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential air quality impacts.

Waste Use of the proposed laydown area would not result in any additional generation of wastes above and beyond what was identified in the original REF.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential waste impacts.





measures

Flooding and drainage

The proposed laydown area is within the Powells Creek catchment and would not impact the hydrology of the catchment, as the works would be localised, temporary and would not require any ground disturbance.

There would be no impact on long-term flooding and drainage patterns as the laydown site would be reinstated to a pre-construction condition at the completion of the works.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential flooding and drainage impacts.

Socio-economic

The use of the laydown area is not expected to improve or worsen the socio-economic impacts identified in the original REF.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential socio-economic impacts.

Property and Land Use

No property acquisition is required for the laydown area. The area is owned by Roads and Maritime and is fenced off as road reserve. Use of the laydown area would be short-term with no permanent changes to land use.

N/A

Visual amenity Visual impacts associated with HCA are described above. The area is currently open space, fenced road reserve. Use of the laydown area would result in short-term impacts on visual amenity for nearby residents and passing traffic. Impacts on visual amenity are considered to be relatively minor and of short term duration.

The proposed area would be surrounded with temporary fencing.

Greenhouse gas and climate change

The use of the laydown area is unlikely to improve or worsen the greenhouse gas emissions described in the original REF.

The potential impacts of climate change on the proposed laydown area are expected to be negligible.

N/A

Hazard and risk The use of the laydown area is unlikely to improve or worsen the hazards and risks associated with the works assessed in the original REF.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential hazards and risks.

Cumulative impacts

The use of the laydown area is unlikely to improve or worsen the potential for minor cumulative impacts associated with nearby construction and development projects that were addressed in the original REF.

Management measures identified in the original REF are considered sufficient to manage potential cumulative amenity impacts.

4.2 Summary of beneficial and adverse effects

The key beneficial outcome to the extension of the use of the laydown area is:

Reduced long vehicle trips to collect necessary materials and tools for utility and services enabling works.



As there is restricted space in road reserves, allowing a laydown area for the utilities works will reduce over-crowding of construction equipment within the road reserves (usually of narrow local streets).

The laydown area is central to the utilities to be completed.

The land is RMS owned.

The key potential adverse impact of the proposal is:

Amenity impacts on nearby residents, particularly noise, visual and traffic impacts.

With the implementation of the safeguards provided in this document and the original REF, these impacts are expected to be relatively minor. Furthermore, the above impacts are temporary in nature.



5 Environmental management

Two additional environmental safeguards have been identified in this assessment undertaken in Section 4. These environmental safeguards would be implemented in addition to those environmental safeguards identified in the original REF (Table 29). Combined, the safeguards would be sufficient to minimise any potential adverse impacts arising from the approved works and proposed change. Table 3 – Summary of additional environmental safeguards for the proposed laydown area

No. Impact Environmental safeguards Responsibility Timing

1. Noise and vibration

Space permitting, the site is arranged to use the shipping container as shielding or to locate material as far from residential receivers as possible.

Project Manager

During works

2. Visual amenity

The laydown area is surrounded with temporary fencing.

Project Manager

During works



6 Justification and conclusion

The Utility and Services Enabling Works Review of Environmental Factors was determined on 25 January 2016 under Part 5 of the EP&A Act. During detailed design, it was identified that a designated laydown area for utility works would be beneficial for materials and tools to be used specifically for the utility works. An REF Addendum Utility Works for the setup and use of the laydown was determined on 1 April 2016. An extension for the use of this laydown area is required to enable completion of utility works and is the subject of this addendum 2 REF. The proposed change facilitates the activities approved in the original REF and would result in short term impacts to the amenity of nearby residents including minimal noise, visual and traffic impacts. The proposed changes are generally consistent with the objects of the EP&A Act as described in the original REF. This addendum 2 to the REF has examined and taken into account to the fullest extent possible all matters affecting or likely to affect the environment as a result of the proposed change. This has included consideration of impacts on threatened species, populations and ecological communities and their habitats and other protected fauna and native plants. The safeguards and management measures as detailed in this addendum 2 REF and the original REF would ameliorate or minimise these expected impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed change are not likely to be significant and therefore it is not necessary for an environmental impact statement to be prepared and approval to be sought for the proposal from the Minister for Planning under Part 5.1 of the EP&A Act. The proposed change is unlikely to affect threatened species, populations or ecological communities or their habitats, within the meaning of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or Fisheries Management Act 1994 and therefore a Species Impact Statement is not required. The proposed change is also unlikely to affect Commonwealth land or have an impact on any matters of national environmental significance.

7 Certification

This review of environmental factors provides a true and fair review of the proposal in relation to its potential effects on the environment. It addresseS to the fullest extent possible all matters affecting or likely to affect the environment as a result of the proposal.

Prepared by:

Alison Kriegel Approvals Coordinator CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture Date:

Reviewed by:

Ryan Franklin Environment and Sustainability Manager CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture Date:

David Kelly Environm nt Manager Sydney otorways Corporation

Terry hapman Stag 1 Project Director Sydney Motorways Corporation

I have examined this review of environmental factors and the certification by the CPB Samsung John Holland Joint Venture and accept the review of environmental factors on alf of Roads and Maritime Services.

p Knudsen Project Director WestConnex Delivery Interface Date: IA Cu( 020*

Utility and Services Enabling Works 15 Addendum 2 to Review of Environmental Factors



8 References

AECOM GHD 2015. WestConnex – M4 East Environmental Impact Statement, WestConnex Delivery Authority, September 2015 DoE 2015 EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool, accessed 28 October 2015 http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/pmst OEH 2013. Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Area OEH 2015 NSW Vegetation Types Database. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biobanking/VegTypeDatabase.htm



Terms and acronyms used in this addendum REF

Canada Bay LEP 2013 Canada Bay Council Local Environmental Plan 2013

CEMP Construction environmental management plan

Critical SSI Critical State significant infrastructure, as declared by the State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011.

EIS Environmental impact statement

EP&A Act Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Provides the legislative framework for land use planning and development assessment in NSW

EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth). Provides for the protection of the environment, especially matters of national environmental significance, and provides a national assessment and approvals process.

FM Act Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW)

ISEPP State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

LEP Local Environmental Plan. A type of planning instrument made under Part 3 of the EP&A Act.

LGA Local Government Area

OEH Office of Environment and Heritage

PACHCI Procedure for Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation and Investigation, prepared by Roads and Maritime (2011a)

REF Review of environmental factors

Roads and Maritime Roads and Maritime Services

ROL Road Occupancy Licence

SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy. A type of planning instrument made under Part 3 of the EP&A Act.

SEPP 55 State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 – Remediation of Land

SMC Sydney Motorway Corporation, formerly WestConnex Delivery Authority (WDA)

SRD SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011

SSI State significant infrastructure

TSC Act Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW)

Appendix A Consideration of clause 228(2) factors and matters of national environmental significance

Utility and Services Enabling Works Appendix A


Clause 228(2) Checklist

In addition to the requirements of the Is an EIS required? guideline as detailed in the REF, the following factors, listed in clause 228(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, have also been considered to assess the likely impacts of the proposal on the natural and built environment.

Factor Impact

a. Any environmental impact on a community? The proposed change may have minor temporary impacts on the local community during use of the laydown area with respect to noise and road use. Use of the laydown area would be short term. The proposed area is not a public space and is not expected to result in any impacts to access for local residents.

Minor short term impact during use of laydown area.

b. Any transformation of a locality?

The proposed change does not cause any transformation of locality as it is the temporary, short term use of a fenced road reserve area.

No Impact

c. Any environmental impact on the ecosystems of the

locality? The proposed change would not require removal of any trees, but may require minor pruning to enable vehicle access to the proposed laydown area. The proposed change is not expected to impact on the ecosystems of this highly urbanised locality.

No Impact

d. Any reduction of the aesthetic, recreational, scientific or

other environmental quality or value of a locality? The proposed change would not affect the aesthetic, recreational, scientific or other environmental quality or value of a locality. The laydown area would be used for approximately 5 months and would be rehabilitated to the existing condition upon completion of works. Temporary screening / fencing would reduce the temporary aesthetic impact of the proposed laydown area.

No Impact

e. Any effect on a locality, place or building having aesthetic,

anthropological, archaeological, architectural, cultural, historical,

scientific or social significance or other special value for present or

future generations? The proposal would not affect any locality, place or building that has aesthetic, anthropological, architectural, cultural, historical, scientific or social significance or other special value for present or future generations. The proposed laydown area would be used and would include temporary screening / fencing to reduce the temporary aesthetic impact.

No Impact



Factor Impact

f. Any impact on the habitat of protected fauna (within the

meaning of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974)? No habitat of protected fauna has been identified as occurring in the study area. The proposed change will not remove any habitat associated with protected fauna and therefore the proposal would not impact on the any protected fauna.

No Impact

g. Any endangering of any species of animal, plant or other

form of life, whether living on land, in water or in the air? The proposed change would not endanger any terrestrial or aquatic species of plant, animal or other life form. No trees would be cleared as a result of the proposed change.

No Impact

h. Any long-term effects on the environment? The proposed change would not have any long term effects on the environment. The works are short-term and the area would be reinstated at the completion of works.

No Impact

i. Any degradation of the quality of the environment? The proposed change would not cause any degradation of the quality of the environment.

No Impact

j. Any risk to the safety of the environment? The proposed change would not cause any risk to the safety of the environment.

No Impact

k. Any reduction in the range of beneficial uses of the

environment? There will be no reduction in the range of beneficial uses of the environment as it involves the temporary use of a restricted access road reserve.

No Impact

l. Any pollution of the environment? The proposed change will not increase the risk of polluting the environment above what was identified in the original REF.

No Impact

m. Any environmental problems associated with the disposal

of waste?

The proposed change will not increase any environmental problems associated with the disposal of waste beyond what was identified in the original REF.

No Impact

n. Any increased demands on resources (natural or

otherwise) that are, or are likely to become, in short supply? The proposed change does not result in any increased demands on resources beyond what was identified in the original REF.

No Impact



Factor Impact

o. Any cumulative environmental effect with other existing or

likely future activities? The proposed change will not have cumulative environmental effects on existing or future activities as it involves the short-term use of a restricted access road reserve.

No Impact

p. Any impact on coastal processes and coastal hazards,

including those under projected climate change conditions? The proposed change would not impact on coastal processes or coastal hazards as it is not located within a coastal zone.

No Impact



Matters of National Environmental Significance

Under the environmental assessment provisions of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, the following matters of national environmental significance and impacts on Commonwealth land are required to be considered to assist in determining whether the proposal should be referred to the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.

Factor Impact Comments

a. Any impact on a World Heritage

property?

Nil There are no world heritage properties in the study area.

b. Any impact on a National Heritage

place?

Nil There are no places of national heritage significance in the study area.

c. Any impact on a wetland of

international importance?

Nil There are no wetlands of international significance the study area.

d. Any impact on a listed threatened

species or communities?

Nil There are no listed threatened species of communities identified as occurring in the study area.

e. Any impacts on listed migratory

species?

Nil There are no listed migratory species of communities identified as occurring in the study area.

d. Any impact on a Commonwealth

marine area?

Nil The proposed study area is not in a Commonwealth Marine Area.

g. Does the proposal involve a nuclear

action (including uranium mining)?

Nil The proposed works do not involve a nuclear action.

Additionally, any impact (direct or indirect)

on Commonwealth land?

Nil The proposed works will not occur on or impact Commonwealth land.

Appendix B Environmental constraints map

Description Date Approved

Scales WESTCONNEX M4 EASTENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS MAP

QUEENS LANE

Rev

Client Status

Project

M4ECompany

LSJHArea

0000Discipline

LADocument

SKLot Number

020Document No.

0Rev

A

OriginalSize

CoordinateSystem

HeightDatum

Filename:

Drawn

Designed

Date Printed

A3

MGA ZONE 56

AHD

NOISENOISE CATCHMENT AREA

!H EDUCATIONAL SENSITIVE RECEIVERS!H PLACES OF WORSHIP SENSITIVE RECEIVERS!H OTHER SENSITIVE RECEIVERS

HERITAGESTATE HERITAGEARCHAEOLOGICALLY SENSITIVES170 HERITAGECONTRIBUTORY HERITAGEPOTENTIAL HERITAGELOCAL HERITAGE

VEGETATIONPLANTATION (NATIVE AND/OR EXOTIC)ESTUARINE SWAMP OAK FORESTESTUARINE MANGROVE FORESTESTUARINE SALTMARSHSYDNEY TURPENTINE-IRONBARK FORESTURBAN EXOTIC/NATIVEWATER

POTENTIAL FOR CONTAMINATIONHIGHMODERATELOW

!H CONTAMINATED SITES

23.03.16A

1:500

0 5 10 15 202.5 m

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS QUEENS LANE.mxd

JC

JC

23.03.16

MODIFIED TENDER DESIGNNOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

Issued for Information

00

Sheet Index

utility and services enabling works - … east - review... · document controls title utility and...

Documents