ut participatory day 2019 · 2019. 9. 24. · ut participatory day – pc workshop celt 25sep2019....

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Dr. Hans van den Berg, DipMCentre of Expertise in Learning & Teaching

University of Twente

UT Participatory Day 2019

“Yes, if” – versus – “No, unless”

15:30 till 16:10ish25 September 2019

https://www.utwente.nl/en/ces/celt/programme-committee/



Agenda proposal

2

15:30 – 15:50 Kick-off, getting acquainted

On the PC and its context

PC: where do you stand and where do you want to be?

15:50 – 16:10 A

What does your PC need? Tree metaphor B

A BProbably wise to chose between and


Who is Hans?

3

Chemist (PhD) Marketer (DipM)Graphic Arts industryResearch & Tech director

Drinking water research, manager

Consulting firm, management

consultant

Trainer, advisor, evaluator, assessor

e.g. EB, PC


Who are you?

4


The Programme Committee in UT’s bigger picture

5

ADMINISTRATIONSupervisory Board

Faculty board

Programmedirector

Examination board

University council

Faculty council

Programme Committee

Eight ServiceCouncils

Institute boardInstitute council

PARTICIPATION COUNCILS

= Supervisory

Service Department

director

Executive Board, EB


How to tackle WHW?

6

For a PC, it is vital to know the details. For training purposes, I tend to use summary information


Legal tasks of a Programme CommitteeWHW, reference date: December 2018

7

WHW states rules for

composition

ProgrammeCommittee

Legal rights and tasks a. Consent on parts of the

EERb. Annual assessment of EER

implementationc. Advice on parts of the EER d. Right to give advice and

making proposalse. Task of discussing visitation

reportf. (and more)

Election or appointment: Faculty Regulations

Chair

Slides in website

PROGRAMME DIRECTOR


Seven themes arise from UT training / evaluation experiences and some UT / Dutch reports

8

1. CONNECTIONS

E.g.: • the EER• ‘What is good education?’• “Yes, if” versus “No, unless”

2. HANDLING COMPLEXITY• Connecting with

Programme Director• Connecting annual

cycles• FC meetings• FC’s visibility

3. PROCESSES

‘Why don’t you read me?’

Re: Paul Simon

4. READING

5. CONTINUITY

PC development opportunities

6. PC STRATEGY

• Evaluate PCs• Link PCs to FC• A PC Platform

7. STRUCTURING

yearsReactive

Proactive

PC

Exam BoardFCPCsStudentsProgramme staffOutside experts


ReferencesMostly in Dutch

9

Further readingHans van den Berg, The Programme Committee,version 1.0, August 2019. Available at


Experiencese.g. visitation-related workshops with Programme Committees and Examination Boards; rehearsal visitations; training

workshops with Programme Committees and Service Councils; evaluation workshop; talks with dean(s), PC chairs, andprogramme directors.

ResourcesWHW (Dutch Higher Education and Research Act), in Dutch: www.wetten.nl

Reports (all but one of them in Dutch)• OC-Wijzer – De handleiding voor je opleidingscommissie. LSVb, 2018• Report on facilitation of participatory bodies at the University of Twente (draft). Contact persons: Marc-Jan Zeeman and

Chris Rouwenhorst. 24 August 2018• Handleiding voor Opleidingscommissies. UvA, Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen, 2018• Algemene Rekenkamer, Voorinvesteringen en medezeggenschap hoger onderwijs. 2018• Monitor Medezeggenschap Hoger Onderwijs – derde peiling 2017-2018. 2018• Tim Cardol, Grote verschillen in functioneren opleidingscommissies. ScienceGuide 29 March 2018

https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/03/grote-verschillen-in-functioneren-opleidingscommissies/• Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Recht van spreken – Het functioneren van opleidingscommissies in het bekostigd hoger

onderwijs in 2016. 2016• Jet Bussemaker, minister OCW, Letter: Inwerkingtreding Wet versterking bestuurskracht, 20 december 2016• Harry van den Tillaart, John Warmerdam en Evelien Sombekke, Monitor medezeggenschap op universiteiten en

hogescholen. ISO – ITS Peiling 2015• A.G.T. Bronzwaer en E.A.A. van Gorp, Onderzoek naar de participatie in medezeggenschapsraden van de Universiteit

Twente. Wetenschapswinkel UT, 2011• Investeren in Onderwijskwaliteit – Kwaliteitsafspraken 2019-2024. ISO – LSVb – OCW – VH – VSNU, 2018


http://www.wetten.nl/

https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/03/grote-verschillen-in-functioneren-opleidingscommissies/

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 10

Exercise A

You can work on the A3 paper


Relationship between PC and Programme Management

11

1

2 3

4

PC Works in isolation

PC Works together with PM

PC Works reactive

PC Works proactive

AEXERCISE


Indicate the current position ( ) of the PC vis-à-vis the PM, andwhat position you would like the UC to have ( ).And draw a line between both

12

1

2 3

4

PC Works in isolation

PC Works together with PM

PC Works reactive

PC Works proactive

Please use a THIN line to

make this less ‘crowded’

AEXERCISE

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 13

Exercise B

You can work on the A3 paper


Operation of a Programme Committeemetaphor = tree

This is where one feeds the tree: firm soil, clean water, ‘pokon’

14

Good feed and attention assure a strong trunk

From the crown one picks the fruits

EXERCISE B


Possible translation to Programme Committee (PC)Instruction = verbally

15

EXERCISEHANDOUT B


Statement: This was a good workshop

16

A. Yes

B. A bit

C. No

G

R

WWould you like to have a report of this workshop?

G

R

W

ut participatory day 2019 · 2019. 9. 24. · ut participatory day – pc workshop celt 25sep2019....

Documents