Tri-Center CSDTechnology

2012-2013-2014

Currently . . .Campus-Wide Network:

40 Physical/Virtual HP Servers/Blades45 HP Pro-Curve Access PointsHP Back-up SystemsHP Switches and ControllersSonicwall FilterDouble Check/ISA e-mail and SPAM FiltersAXXIS 24-hour Surveillance Camera System

25MB of Internet Bandwidth via the ICN

Currently . . .Elementary:

1 Terminal Services Lab (HP)4 Mini-Laptop Carts (Lenovo)PC/Laptop and an iPad2 for every teacher

1 or 2 Student PC/Laptops in each classroom

Projector Systems in every classroom

Document Cameras in 15 classrooms

Wireless Access throughout the building

Currently . . .Middle School:

1 Terminal Services Lab (HP)3 Laptop Carts (HP)PC/Laptop and an iPad2 for every teacher

Projector Systems in every classroom

Document Cameras in 3 classroomsWireless Access throughout the building

Currently . . .High School:

3 Terminal Services Labs (HP)4 Laptop Carts (HP)PC/Laptop and an iPad2 for every teacher

Projector Systems in every classroom

Document Cameras in 4 classroomsWireless Access throughout the building

What the Research says . . .

The future of Ed Tech is “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD), and schools will more than likely move away from providing devices for students sooner than later. While BYOD is far too radical for many school districts at this time, it is inevitable that this is the future. The sooner districts embrace this future and begin to plan for it, the more effective this transition will be. . . . How are we going to continue to truly ban all of this “student owned” technology in schools?

Posted by Scott Meech on Ed Tech website (May 22, 2011)

More from the field . . .

BYOD isn’t about the devices themselves—kids bring in a variety of technology—it’s about creating constructive change in teaching practices, just like kids bringing pencils to school . . . they bring their technology to help them whenever it is appropriate.

Tim Clark, Instructional Technology Specialist, Forsyth County Schools

While BYOD is not a simple means of getting to one-to-one, it is still the only viable, long-term solution. Are you going to let the challenges stop BYOD from coming to your district? By 2015, it will happen.

Elliot Soloway, Professor at University of Michigan, Chair of ISTE SIGML

Fears . . . . . . Technology leaders at BYOD schools say, a fear of problems such as access to inappropriate online content, digitally enhanced cheating, and rampant classroom distractions can lead districts to overthink, and worse, overwrite corresponding policy adjustments to stifle creative implementation of the devices. Early reports from the field suggest that the simpler approach is more successful. Districts that appear to be experiencing the smoothest transitions from banning mobile devices to welcoming them have undergone as little policy change as possible, striking or heavily revising only obvious barriers such as districtwide cell phone bans. They then issue school-level acceptable use guidelines that reflect individual campus cultures and treat violations of those guidelines like other behavioral issues.

Ian Quillen, Digital Directions. Org

Best technology available for personalized learning?

Brent Williams, Director of Tech, Kenesaw State University, says, “Easy answer: the iPad”Elliott Soloway, Professor, University of Michigan, says, “Ahh, let me think . . . Hmmm . . . I think . . . Personal, 24/7, networked, embedded in your palm: Mobile Technologies.”Adam Bellow, Founder, eduTeacher, says, “I think of my iPhone and Twitter as the best personalized learning tools.”

#1 complaint students have about technology in schools?

Kathy Schrock, Director of Tech, Nauset Public Schools, says, “Students want to know why they cannot use their own laptops or pads on the school’s WiFi”Meg Ormiston, Professional Development Speaker, Tech Teachers, says, “Students are frustrated because the equipment in most schools is old and the technology is not personal to them.”

Two elements every 21st century classroom should have ?

Stephen Velz, Teacher, Swift Creek Middle School, says, “Dependable wireless connectivity and, more importantly, teachers willing to employ 21st century strategies in using the devices.”Rushton Hurley, Executive Director, NextVista.org, says, “Strong WiFi with minimal filtering, and teachers prepared to help students understand how to hold themselves to higher standards when encountering problematic material.”

The most significant change inK-12 IT over the next three years?

“Each student will have access to a device, 24/7, with internet access. I mean every student.” --Kathy Schrock

“We will see more districts allow outside devices into schools. Due to shrinking budgets, we will have to welcome these devices and figure out a way to have enough bandwidth to serve everyone.”

--Meg Ormiston“IT departments relinquishing control. Teachers are shifting the programs they use from local computers to online alternatives. BYOD programs will become more prevalent. While it may seem more chaotic to many, on an individual level it will be empowering.”

--Steve Dembo, Online Manager, DE

“I would identify three key changes: cloud computing, integration of student-owned devices with school networks, and the development of digitally based curriculum and textbooks by districts.” --Julie Evans, CEO, Project Tomorrow

Best Practices for Implementing Evolving Classroom Technologies

in K-12Plan Thoroughly . . . Allot plenty of time for planning—six months to a year is not unreasonable. The planning phase includes an infrastructure evaluation. Internet must be fast, reliable and available throughout campus. Wireless coverage should be as ubiquitous as possible. At minimum, the wireless network should cover all classrooms and common areas such as the library and cafeteria.Bridge the Digital Divide . . . Plan carefully to ensure that lack of technology access does not exclude some learners from participation. For example, when planning a BYOD initiative, estimate how many students lack a device and create a pool for them to checkout. If out-of-school internet access is required, make sure there’s a solution for students who don’t have broadband at home.

The T-C Student Poll . . .

How many students in grades 9-12 own a Smartphone? 100 or 43%How many students in grades 6-8 own a Smartphone? 41 or 26%How many students in grades 9-12 own a laptop or other mobile device such as an iPad? 129 or 55%How many students grades 6-8 own a laptop or other mobile device such as an iPad? 99 or 62%How many students in grades 9-12 have access to the internet at home? 215 or 93%How many students in grades 6-8 have access to the internet at home? 155 or 97%

“An institution’s wireless network must be able to

support the use of fixed computer labs,

laptop carts, 1:1 computing

initiatives and BYOD programs.”

--Center for Digital Education 2012

“The most effective

professional development initiatives are

ongoing, collaborative, and

integrated with daily teaching.”--The Evolving Classroom, Center for Digital

Education

Distinguished Educator . . .

Create better digital opportunities in the classroom. I use the SAMR model to implement the 4 levels of innovation . . .

Substitute Augment Modify Redefine

Jennie Magiera, Apple Distinguished Educator in Chicago Public Schools

Presented on the use of iPads in 4th/5th grade at the TIES Conference

Jennie is math/tech coach who writes curriculum and leads workshops

BYOD is Unstoppable

Inevitable

Mobile Technologies are PROPELLING

Change

•By 2015 every student in every grade in every school will be

using a mobile learning device, 24/7, for curricular purposes.

Sooner or later . . . You WILL go BYOD

Planfully . . . Or not. Your Choice!!

--the JOURNAL, Webinar Series

Proposing . . .Elementary:

In addition to what is currently in place that will provide a dual platform with longevity and sustainability for the district:

3 New iPad Carts (20 devices each) 1 each to be shared for grades K-1, 2-3, and 4-5

Cost: $33,000 for devices $7,000 for carts

Issues: Covers/Cases for iPads

BYOD implemented full-scale for K through 5 in January 2013

Proposing . . .Middle School:

In addition to what is currently in place that will provide a dual platform with longevity and sustainability for the district:

2 New iPad Carts (20 devices each) To be shared among grades 6-7-8

2 New Laptop Carts (20 devices each) To be shared among grades 6-7-8

Cost: $42,000 for devices $6,000 for carts

Issues: Covers/Cases for iPads

BYOD implemented full-scale for 6 through 8 in August 2012

Proposing . . .High School:

In addition to what is currently in place that will provide a dual platform with longevity and sustainability for the district:

2 New iPad Carts (20 devices each) To be shared among grades 9-10-11-12

2 New Laptop Carts (20 devices each) To be shared among grades 9-10-11-12

Cost: $42,000 for devices $6,000 for carts

Issues: Covers/Cases for iPads/App Costs

BYOD implemented full-scale for 9 through 12 in August 2012

Costs & Financing$Costs affiliated with Apple Inc. are not negotiable, but are most attractive when bundled in 10-packs.

$Costs affiliated with Lenovo and HP are negotiable and can be competitively bid for best pricing.

$Financing can be arranged via Apple Inc., local banks, or a hardware vendor. However, if funding is available via fiscal budgeting then 3-year installment plans and interest accrual can be avoided.

Accessibility & Mobility . . .

Continue to develop/offer this hybrid philosophyImplement measures during 2012-2013 school year

that will drive the decisions made for/during 2013-2014Maintain solid infrastructure to ensure optimizationMonitor the industry closely for guidance on next

steps in regards to upgrades and enhancementsProvide students/families with direction and

resources that will enable them to obtain devices and access broadband internet at school and at homeKeep educating our staff/students/community