update on the regulatory framework for biocidal products ... · update on the regulatory framework...
TRANSCRIPT
Update on the regulatory framework for biocidal products in Japan
Keisuke Ozaki, D.V.M., Ph.D., D.J.S.T.P., General Manager, Regulatory Affairs & Chemical Safety Dept.
Environmental Health Division, SUMITOMO CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
1
• Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (JPAL) • Organization for evaluate biocidal products in Japan • Flowchart for evaluation and approval • Good vigilance practice (GVP) • Insecticide Standards of Japan • Biocidal product under Chemical Substance Control
Law (CSCL). • Japan Household Insecticide Industry Association • HHI market overview and typical product type
2
Contents
3
In Japan, Biocide is regulated under Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (JPAL), together with pharmaceutical products for human or animals, cosmetics and medical devices.
USA; FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act) together with pesticides. EU; BPR (Biocidal Product Regulation)
JPAL has NO TG registration system for biocides, but only product registration (Revised JPAL in 2006).
The Pharmaceutical Affairs Law
Article 1, Objectives This Pharmaceutical Affairs Law contains specifications required to ensure the quality, efficacy and safety of drugs, quasi-drugs, cosmetics and medical devices and its aims is to improve the public health by taking measures necessary to promote the development of drugs and medical devices required for healthcare.
4
Ref: Drug Approval and Licensing Procedures in Japan 2006
5
The Pharmaceutical Affairs Law
Ref: Drug Approval and Licensing Procedures in Japan 2006
Article 2 Definition of drugs (1) The items listed in the Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP).
(2) The items (other than quasi-drugs) which are intended for use in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease in humans or animals and which are not classified as devices, dental materials, or medical or sanitary supplies.
Biocidal A.Is are included in this category.
6 Ref: Drug Approval and Licensing Procedures in Japan 2006
Article 2, Quasi-drugs Quasi-drug are products used for the following purpose. They must be substances which act mildly on the human body or the similar substances designated by the MHLW.
(1) Articles intended for the uses specified in the following ①to ③ excluding equipment/instruments etc.(excluding drugs) ① To prevent nausea or other discomfort, or bad breath or body odor. ② To prevent heat rash, festering, etc. ③ To prevent the loss of hair, or to grow or remove hair.
(2) Articles intended for the uses to exterminate or prevent rats, flies, mosquitoes, fleas, etc. in order to ensure the health and hygiene of humans or animals excluding equipment/instruments etc. (excluding drugs)
Generally, biocidal products are included in this category
Classification of insecticides under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law
1. Quasi-drugs. • Commonly, the products containing pyrethroids are
classified as quasi-drug. (Coil, Mat, LV, Aerosol, One push etc.) • Bait station • Repellent (DEET) 2. Drugs • Others should be classified as drugs. (Fumigant, Total release aerosol)
7 Ref: Drug Approval and Licensing Procedures in Japan 2012
8
MHLW
PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Incorporated administrative agency External agency The third party
Request Report
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Ref: PMDA profile of services
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)
9
1. Development history 2. Oversea registration information 3. Comparison with current formualtion 4. Physical & Chemical data, specification, analytical method 5. Stability studies (long-term, accelerated, at other conditions) 6. Toxicological studies Acute, Subacute, Chronic, Reproductive toxicity, Mutagenicity, Sensitization and Metabolism. ★Risk assessment of human health should be discussed 7.Efficacy study From 2005, the registration system for A.I. was disappeared. Therefore, only the product registration system in Japan.
10
Data requirement of product containing New A.I.
Ref: Drug Approval and Licensing Procedures in Japan 2012
11
Item Study USA EU Japan Item Study USA EU Japan
Acute
Oral – Rats ○ ○ ○ Carcinogenicity
2Y Oral – Rats △ ○
Oral – Dogs ○ 1.5Y Oral – Mice △ ○
Dermal – Rats ○ ○ ○ Neurotoxicity
Acute Oral – Rats ○
Inhalation – Rats ○ ○ ○ 90days Oral – Rats ○
Sub Chronic
30days Oral – Rats ○
Reproduction
Teratogenicity
ICH-Ⅰ – Rats ○
30days Inhalation – Rats ○ ○ ICH-Ⅱ- Rats ○
90days Oral – Rats △ ○ ○ ICH-Ⅲ- Rats ○ ○ ○
90days Oral – Dogs △ ○ ○ ICH-Ⅲ – Rabbits ○ ○ ○
90days Dermal – Rats ○ Two gen – Rats ○ ○
90days Inhalation – Rats △ ○ Irritation
Eye – Rabbits ○ ○ ○
Chronic 1Y Oral – Rats △ ○ ○ Skin – Rabbits ○ ○ ○
1Y Oral – Dogs ○ Sensitization Skin – Guinea pig ○ ○ ○
Muta-genicity
Ames ○ ○ ○ Immunotoxicity Oral – Rats ○
in vitro Mammalian cell ○ ○
Chromosome abberration ○ ○ ○ Metabolism
Single dose – Rats △ ○ ○
in vitro Micronucleus ○ △ ○ Repeated dose – Rats △ ○ ○
in vivo Micronucleus ○
Unscheduled DNA synthesis
△ △ Pharmacology General
Pharmacology ○
Regulatory studies required by Competent Authority - Human health (Toxicology) -
○; Required, △; Conditionally required
12
Item Study USA EU Japan Item Study USA EU Japan
Fish toxicity
Acute toxicity – Bluegill ○ ○
Avian toxicity
Acute Oral – Quail ○
Acute toxicity – Carp ○ Dietary toxicity - Quail ○
Early life stage ○ Reproduction ○
Daphnia Acute toxicity ○ ○
Honey bee Acute Contact ○
Whole life stage ○ Acute Oral ○
Marine organism
Acute – Oyster ○ ○ Earthworm Acute ○
Acute – Hyalella azteca ○
E-fate
Hydrolysis ○ ○
Acute – Fathead minnow ○ Aquatic photo degradation ○
Chironomid Bottom sediment △ Gas photo degradation △ ○
Aquatic Organism
Tier I ○ Soil degradation △ ○
Tier II △ ○ Adsorption desorption – Soil ○ ○
Terrestrial organism
Vegetative vigor △ Adsorption coefficient ○
Activated sulge Respiration inhibition ○ Bioaccumula
tion
Bluegill △ ○
Degradation ○ ○ Carp ○
Regulatory studies required by Competent Authority - Environment (Eco toxicity, E-fate) -
○; Required, △; Conditionally required
13
Acute/Subacute/Chronic Reproduction Mutagenesis Irritation etc.
Human exposure (Exposure)
Toxicological data (NOAEL)
A.I. concentration in air
Risk assessment of HHI product
𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴𝑴 𝒐𝒐 𝑬𝑬𝑬𝒐𝑬𝑬𝑴𝑬 𝑴𝑴𝑬 =𝑵𝑴𝑵𝑬𝑵
𝑬𝑬𝑬𝒐𝑬𝑬𝑴𝑬
MOE > 100 : Safety
14
Review timeline of PDMA Product containing
New A.I. Product containing
Existing A.I.
Approval ~ 2 years for New AI ~10 month for Existing AI
submission Applicator
PMDA Inquiries important issue
Expert discussion Review report preparation
MHLW Reviews by drug committees
Judgment
Review & Report
CONFIDENTIAL, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Good Vigilance practice (GVP)
15
Medical institutions
Company
• Collection/confirmation of information regarding quality, efficacy, and safety of drugs and medical devices
• Analysis • Considering safety
measures • Implementing safety
measures
PMDA
• Corporate hearing ↓
• Data collection/analysis ↓
Discussion with experts
↓ • Reporting the results of
review/ analysis
Medical institutions/General public
MHLW
• Tracking all the information
• Planning/development of safety measures
• Implementation of safety measures
Broad dissemination of information
Including drugs, quasi-drugs
Ref: PMDA profile of services (revised)
Flowchart of Relief Services
16
PMDA Minister of MHLW
Medical institutions Pharmacies
Adverse health effects sufferers
Company
Claim for benefits
Notice & Payment
Distribution
Prescribed Purchased
Adverse Drug reaction Contributions
Request for judgment
Notice of judgment
Ref: PMDA profile of services (revised)
Including drugs, quasi-drugs
Insecticide Standards of Japan • Insecticide Standards was first published in 1965. It contains the
specifications and analytical methods of approved active ingredients and products.
• Unlike the Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP), Insecticide Standards is a semi-official document.
• In fact, the A.I. which specification meets the Insecticide
Standards can be used. • Recently, MHLW intend to revise the Insecticide Standards
(1990) . Adding the Efficacy and Safety Parts into the Insecticide Standards.
17
Item (%) Approval Spec.
Insecticide Standard(Draft)
Remark
A.I. content 90.0% min. 90.0~96.0% - Impurity (A) 3.0% max. 7.0% max.
(As total impurities) New unknown impurities other than A to D can be included.
Impurity (B) 1.0% max. Impurity (C) 0.5% max. Impurity (D) 4.0% max.
Insecticide Standard of A.I (example)
• There are no limitation of each impurity content. Therefore, it seems that Insecticide Standards doesn’t pay attention to existing and unknown impurities.
• It is well known that some kinds of impurities have high toxic potential. And the impurities issue is a major point for equivalence.
18
• For ensure the product safety, approval specification contains each impurity. Especially, regarding the more than 0.1% impurity, its specification is strictly controlled in EU and US.
• However, in Japan, only the total impurities contents is listed in the Insecticide Standards as a rough specification.
• Therefore, we cannot discuss the A.I equivalency or same product issue based on such insufficient specification of the Insecticide Standard.
• We are now negotiating with the MHLW to ask them to set more
strict specification or list each impurity for ensure the product safety.
Concerning points of Insecticide Standards* (* Only applicable for Biocides in Japan)
19
Chemical Substance Control Law (CSCL)
• Authority: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of the Environment. • Japan version of the REACH. • The unique point of CSCL: • If the CLAIM of insecticide product is for agricultural pest insects,
the product should be regulated by the law of pesticide. • If the CLAIM of insecticide product is for sanitary insect, the
product should be regulated by the law of pharmaceutical. • If the CLAIM of the insecticide product is for the insects such as
ants, wasp, moths, the containing active ingredients same as for hygiene pests fall into Chemical Substance Control Law (just a notification required). 20
Regulation for biocides in Japan
Fly, Mosquito, Cockroach, Flea, Louse, Mite, etc.
Hygiene pests
Grasshopper, Shield bug, Aphid, Thrips, Bark beetle, Skin beetle, Cabbage moth, Beet armyworm, etc.
Agricultural pests
Shield bug, Moth fly, Carpet beetle, Bark beetle, Spider, Slug, Millipede, Wood louse, Ant, Sow bug, Clothes moth
Nauseous insects Clothing insects
Wood attacking insects
Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (Regulatory authority: MHLW)
Chemical Substance Control Law (Just a notification needed.)
Pesticide Legislation (Regulatory authority: MAFF)
Biocide regulation in Japan
Fly, Mosquito, Cockroach, Flea, Louse, Mite, etc.
Hygiene pests
Shield bug, Moth fly, Carpet beetle, Bark beetle, Spider, Slug, Millipede, Wood louse, Ant, Sow bug, Clothes moth
Nauseous insects Clothing insects
Wood attacking insects
Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (Regulatory authority: MHLW)
Chemical Substance Control Law (Just a notification needed.)
・Should be regulated together with more organized law like BPR. ・Competent Authority in Japan shared same concern.
Japan Household Insecticide (HHI) society Established:1971 Objective:Improve the Japan HHI industry. Member:17 companies Action: Development Regulation research Prevail safety information of insecticide for consumer Negotiation with authority HP: http://sacchuzai.jp/index.html
23
Product type of biocide in Japanese market
Mosquito Coil Liquid vaporizer Fan device Aerosol(FIK)
Total release aerosol Fumigant
Resin device
Bait station Aerosol(CIK)
Repellent One push aerosol EC or Powder 24
Ref: http://sacchuzai.jp/howto.html
25
History of Device improvement
Trend of market Convenience Low temperature ECO friendly
Creating the new market based on the new A. I development.
Resin type product No need to heating and power.
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
75,000
80,000
85,000
90,000
95,000
100,000
105,000
2005CY 2006CY 2007CY 2008CY 2009CY 2010CY 2011CY 2012CY 2013CY
Total
Non registered
Resin
LV
Aerosol (FIK)
Coil
Deet
Smoke
Fruit Fly
Aerosol (CIK)
Meter dose aerosol
Fan
Stationary (herb)
Mat
Trend of formulation in Japanese HHI market (Million JPY)
(Left axis)
(Million JPY)
Confidential
Thank you for your attention
27