up ace mtl unit 1 session 1

40
1 Module 2: Managing Teaching and Learning Unit 1: Leading and Managing a School as a Learning Organisation Presenter: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD) 28 February 2009

Upload: education-moving-up-cc

Post on 27-May-2015

467 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

1

Module 2:Managing Teaching and

Learning

Unit 1: Leading and Managing a School as a Learning Organisation

Presenter: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD)28 February 2009

Page 2: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

2

Content

1. Introduction;

2. Preparing yourself as a curriculum leader;

3. The context for school leadership;

4. Distributed leadership for effective teaching and learning;

5. Establishing a learning culture;

6. Developing plans to manage and lead;

7. Conclusion

Page 3: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

3

Introduction• Teaching and learning is the core activity or

focus of any school;• There is clearly a different between ‘teaching’

and ‘learning’;• There is a ‘client’, a ‘service provider’ and a

‘product/service’ in any transaction (where people are getting paid to render the product/service.

• Service provider should render the product/service as required by the client.

• “The quality of your product/service is an Attitude.”

Page 4: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

4

Dysfunctionality vis-à-vis Under-performanceFigure 10: Three levels of school functionality in relation to the support needed by

schools

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% -10% -20%

Non -Fu nct ion ing -20% – +20%

Lo w -Fu nct ion ing 21% - 60%

H igh -Fun ction ing 61% - 100%

Basics

Gallie 2006

Page 5: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

5

External and internal difference

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 6: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

6

Activity 1 (in class)1. Mentors must identify themselves;2. Mentors must identify a row they want to sit in

(position yourself on the right hand corner);3. Participants must join their mentor in the

particular row;4. Participants must arrange themselves (closest to

the mentor), from ‘dysfunctional’ [-20%-20%], to ‘low functioning’ [21%-60%], to ‘high functioning’ [61%-100%] school they manage;

5. Primary schools must organise them based on the Matric results of their secondary schools (to which your are a feeder school).

Page 7: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

7

Activity 2 (in class)

1. Clearly define and explain the meaning of “Teaching” and “Learning”;

2. Define what the difference is between these two activities;

3. Define the ‘inter-connectedness’ of these terms; and

4. Define which one comes first, if any.

Page 8: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

8

Different Perspectives

Understanding the situation wellQuickTime™ and a

YUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 9: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

9

QuestionnaireWhat makes a

school successful?Characteristics of

successful schools

Factors that support change in different schools Successful stories

Practical recommendations

Contextual elements

Conditions elements

The Learning school

1 School ethosClear and shared

focus [2] Vision [2] Teacher attitude [7]Dynamic leadership

[3 + 4]Mission and vision

statement [2] Leadership [3 + 4]Clear

purpose [1] Identity [1]

2

Vision, Aims and Strategic Planning

High standards and expectations [1] Leadership [3 + 4]

Clarity of innovation [2]

Make structures more flexible [5]

Core values, principles and goals

[1]Political stability [5’ 6

+ 7]Inspiring vision [2] Strategy [2]

3 The PrincipalEffective school

leadership [3 + 4]High Academic Standards [2] Teacher training [7]

Allocate resources to support educators [6

+ 7]Administrative support [3 + 4]

Levels of cooperation [7]

Strong ownership [6]

Structures and

procedures [5]

4Principal and

SMT

High levels of collaboration and

Communication [6]Standards of the

heart [1]

Communication and support

implementation [6]Create a discourse of

possibility [10]Develop governance

structures [9]Knowledge of reform

[10]Broad

capacity [5]Technical support [5]

5

Structures, Roles and

Responsibilities

Curriculum, Instruction and

Assessment aligned with standards [2]

Family-school-community

partnerships [8]

Make contingencies compatible with classroom [10]

Set up broad advisory board [8]

Understanding processes and

relationships [5, 6 + 7]

Tangible organisational support [6]

Human resources [3

+ 4]

6

Decision making and

Communication

Frequent monitoring of teaching and

learning [5]Professional

development [7]Develop evaluation

plan [5]

Ability and willingness to support

change [3 + 4]

Leadership and

management [3, 4 + 9]

7Professional

work relationshipFocused professional

development [7]Evidence of success

[10]

Development standards and

assessment plan [6]Administrative capacity [3 + 4]

The context [6, 7, 8 + 9]

8

Links with parents and community

Supportive learning environment [5]

Get internal and external support [8 +

9]Fiscal capacity [3 +

4]

9 SGB and DoE

High levels of communicty and

parental involvement [8 + 9]

Involve stakeholders in all processes [8 +

9]

10Managing Change

Origin of School Functionality Questionnaire Components

Page 10: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

10

A. School Ethos Responses

Questions Yes No I don’t know

1. Are attendance, discipline and vandalism by learners major problems in school?      

B. Vision, Aims and Strategic Planning Responses

1. Do the principal and you, as staff member share a common vision about the school’s future development?      

C. The Principal Responses

1. Does the principal provide strong leadership and a definite sense of direction through a clear vision based beliefs and values?      

D. The Principal and the Senior Management Team Responses

1. Are they working well together as a team through clearly defined roles and responsibilities known to staff?      

E. Structures, Roles and Responsibilities Responses

1. Is there a clear organisational structure that is appropriate for meeting the school’s aims?      

F. Decision Making and Communication Responses

1. Are staff meetings used for the discussion of major policy issues?      

G. Professional Working Relationships Responses

1. Is there a good team spirit?      

H. Links with Parents and the Community Responses

1. Are teachers working to build and maintain good relations with parents?      

I. The Governing Body and Department of Education Responses

1. Are the staff and governing body enjoying a positive and harmonious relationship?      

J. Managing Change Responses

1. Is the school receptive to innovation and change?      

Questionnaire on School Functionality (SFI)

Page 11: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

11

  Y = Preferred response (both Yes and No)

SummaryResponses

 

PercentageY=n A. School Ethos Pos

Y=p QuestionsYes No Don’t

knowDiff. %

Yes NoDon't know

n1.1 Are attendance, discipline and vandalism by learners major problems in school?

23 1 02 4 96% 4% 0%

p1.2 Are most of the parents proud that their children are attending this school?

4 4 162 17 17% 17% 67%

p1.3 Is there a general concern through the teaching and learning process to provide quality education?

19 3 22 79 79% 13% 8%

n

1.4 Is a questioning, critical attitude actively encouraged, and a complacency attitude actively discouraged among staff?

11 10 3

2 46 46% 42% 13%

p1.5 Is there a continual striving for improvement and growth among teachers?

10 9 52 42 42% 38% 21%

p

1.6 Are teachers holding high expectations of learner behaviour and achievements through displaying confidence in them?

4 15 4

3 17 17% 65% 17%

p 1.7 Is there an open atmosphere for change in the school? 8 9 6 3 35 35% 39% 26%

p 1.8 Are teachers talking freely about professional matters? 16 6 2 2 67 67% 25% 8%

p1.9 Are learners and teachers feeling safe and secure at school?

4 17 23 17 17% 74% 9%

p1.10 Are teachers working in a stimulating, enjoyable and satisfying atmosphere?

1 21 22 4 4% 88% 8%

         

Summary of Analysis of Questionnaire responses

Page 12: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

12

Entire summary

Page 13: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

13

Graph 9 - School Ethos

417 79

46

42

1735

67

17 4

0

20

40

60

80

100

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 1 Graph 10 - Vision, Aims and Strategic Planning

8 13 38

25

38

5452

1313

21

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 2

Graph 11 - The Principal

2117

42

39

38

63

3042

42

50

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 3 Graph 12 - The Principal and SMT

25

63

43

25

3842

46

33

33

29

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 4

Page 14: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

14

Graph 13 - Structures, Roles and Responsibilities

33 39

39

35

262638

67

25 80

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 5

Graph 14 - Decision Making and Communication

96

54

78

61

523354

58

92

67

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 6

Graph 15 - Professional Working Relationships

3829

67

42

46

70

35

54

4217

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 7

Graph 16 - Links with Parents and Community

50

2967

74

75

4021

38 80

2040

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 8

Page 15: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

15

Graph 17 - The SGB and DoE

8

50

54

21004250

43

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 9

Graph 18 - Managing Reform

54

1733

214

2113

1421

17

0

20

40

60

80

1001

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Results 10

A. School Ethos 32.8

B. Vision, Aims and Strategic Planning 27.5

C. The Principal 38.4

D. The Principal and the Senior Management Team 37.7

E. Structures, Roles and Responsibilities 33.6

F. Decision Making and Communication 64.5

G. Professional Working Relationships 44.0

H. Links with Parents and the Community 36.6

I. The Governing Body and Department of Education 20.5

J. Managing Change 21.5

Average 35.7

Graph 19 - Level of school Functionality A

0102030405060708090

100School Ethos

Vision, Aims and Strategic Planning

The Principal

The Principal and SMT

Structures, Roles and ResponsibilitiesDecision making and Communication

Professional Work Relationships

Links with Parents and Community

SGB and DoE

Managing Change

Page 16: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

16

Graph 20 - Level of School Functionality B

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

School Ethos

Vision, Aims and Strategic

Planning

The Principal

The Principal and SMT

Structures, Roles and

Responsibilities

Decision Making and

Communication

Professional Work

Relationships

Links with Parents and

Community

SGB and DoE

Managing Change

Level of School Functionality (SFI)

Requests for use of the SFI - [email protected]

Page 17: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

17

Defining Dysfunctional schools• Schools who continue to function, but do not accomplish the purpose

for which they were created;• Schools exist to help each child realise his or her fullest potential as a

human being;• Schools become dysfunctional when they stop serving the needs of the

individuals with them;• School can take on a life of their own where their main objective

becomes self-preservation;• One of the key indicators that a school has become dysfunctional is the

‘no talk rule’. Those within the school are not permitted, and do not permit themselves, to speak (or even think) critically about the school

• Critical thinking begins with the question “why?” Why are we doing this? Why are things arranged this way? Why do we do it this way and not that way? These kinds of questions are not allowed in a dysfunctional group;

• The other indicator is the evolution of a priestly caste whose allegiance is more strongly tied to the school than it is to the learners the school is meant to serve - this means the teachers and administrators within the school

Page 18: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

18

Non-Functioning Schools (NFS)

Low Functioning Schools (LFS)

High Functioning Schools (HFS)

Leadership Level 1

Management Level 2

Administration Level 3

Conceptual Argument -Types of Functionalities (relating to the Core Purpose)

Page 19: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

19

10 Different mentalities

1. Definition of Teacher Quality;2. Subject and/or learning area choices;3. Time tabling;4. Measuring productivity systems;5. Quality Assurance systems;6. Learner Expectation (success);7. Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence Systems;8. Multiple Opportunities; and9. Time Utilisation; and10.Difference between Home-work and School-work.

Page 20: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

20

1. Defining Teaching Quality• Three related schools of thought - Good teaching is defined by (a) what the

teacher brings into the classroom - that is, TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS, (b) what teachers do while they are in the classroom - TEACHING PRACTICES, and © what learners take out of the classroom - LEARNERS LEARNING GAINS;

• A. Focusing on TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS note that standards (e.g. obtaining a degree/diploma, passing a professional examination) are set to ensure a degree of quality. The logic here is that it is difficult to measure teaching quality directly, so indirect measures should be used;

• B. Others argue for a more direct measure of what teachers actually do. Those who focus on TEACHING PRACTICE argue for five common pedagogical principles, namely: 1. Building on learners’prior knowledge; 2. Linking goals, assessment and instruction; 3. Teaching content and critical thinking; 4. Developing language skills; and 5. Creating a culture of learning;

• C. There are those who reject measuring “inputs” (teacher characteristics) or “processes” (teaching practices) and argue that only outcomes matter. In this case, defining teaching quality is about HIGH LEARNER PERFORMANCE.

Page 21: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

21

2. Subject Choices AvailableNo. Low-functioning School High-functioning School

1 Language 1st Language 1st

2 Language 2nd Language 2nd

3 Maths or Maths Lit Maths or Maths Lit

4 History or Science History

5 CAT or Accounting Science

6 Life Orientation CAT

7 Business Economics Accounting

8 Life Orientation

9 Business Economics

Page 22: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

22

3. Organising of Time table1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Mon 1

H

2

I

3

G

4

H

5 6 7 8 9

Tues 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8

Wed 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 7

Thurs 1

L

2

O

3

W

4 4 5 5 6 6

Fri

Page 23: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

23

Non-Functioning Schools (NFS)

Low Functioning Schools (LFS)

High Functioning Schools (HFS)

Performance Management and Reward Systems

Evaluation and Appraisal Systems

Supervisory and Accountability

systems

4. Measuring Teaching Quality i.r.t. different school functionalities

The Judgement of Quality is dependent on the Quality of the Judgement.

Page 24: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

24

Non-Functioning Schools (NFS)

Low Functioning Schools (LFS)

High Functioning Schools (HFS)

Getting them to perform ‘optimally’

Performance Management and Reward Systems

Getting them ‘to do something extra’

Evaluation and Appraisal Systems

Getting them ‘to do their job’

Supervisory and Accountability

systems

5. Focus of the measuring tool ..

Page 25: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

25

Non-Functioning Schools (NFS)

Low Functioning Schools (LFS)

High Functioning Schools (HFS)

Getting the OUTCOMES right

Performance Management and Reward Systems

Getting the PROCESS right

Evaluation and Appraisal Systems

Getting the INPUT right

Supervisory and Accountability

systems

5. Keeping their ‘eye’ on achieving …

Page 26: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

26

6. In relation to Matric ResultsFigure 10: Three levels of school functionality in relation to the support needed by

schools

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% -10% -20%

Non -Fu nct ion ing -20% – +20%

Lo w -Fu nct ion ing 21% - 60%

H igh -Fun ction ing 61% - 100%

Average (50%) in Matric Results

Page 27: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

27

7. Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence Systems

Data - what was (NFS);

Information - what is (LFS);

Knowledge - what could be (HFS);

Intelligence - what should be (HFS).

Page 28: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

28

7. SASAMS System1.

Knowing2.

Under-standing

3.Teaching

4. Another

Teaching

7. Another Learning

6. Learning

5. Support

8. Assessment

9. Support

10. Evaluation

Page 29: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

29

8. Multiple Opportunities

Low-functioning SchoolQuarter 1

TeachTest or Exam

Quarter 2 Teach

Test or Exam

Quarter 3 Teach

Test or Exam

Quarter 4 Teach

Test or Exam

High-functioning SchoolQuarter 1

TeachTest or Exam

Quarter 2 Teach

Test or Exam

Quarter 3 Teach

Test or Exam

Support and

Support

Test or Exam

Page 30: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

30

9. Time Utilisation

Low-functioning School High-functioning School

20% Teaching 20% Teaching

20% Teaching 20% Learning

20% Teaching 20% Learning

20% Teaching 20% Learning

20% Learning 20% Learning

Page 31: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

31

9. What do we know about our teachers and/or officials?

Teaching(Information Sharing)

Learning(Taking ownership of Information)

Remembering Understanding

Teaching(Information Sharing)

Remembering

Page 32: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

32

9. Types of Teaching - Learning

Teaching Learning

Teaching and Learning

Teaching and LearningTeaching for Learning

Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning Teaching Learning

Teaching as Learning

None or to Little time and support for Learning

Plenty of time and support for Learning

All the time and support are for Learning

Page 33: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

33

10. Homework vis-à-vis Schoolwork vis-à-vis Busywork vis-à-vis Parent’s work

• Learning takes place throughout the day, whether ‘in school’ or ‘out of school’;

• They can be categorised as ‘different’ types of learning;

• Given different situations and circumstances, the one becomes more important than the other;

• We need all of them in our lives.

Page 34: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

34

Conclusion - You Taught Me• You taught me the names of cities in the world, but;• I don’t know how to survive the streets in my own city;• You taught me the minerals that are in the earth, but;• I do not know what to do to prevent my world’s destruction;• You taught me how to speak and write in three languages,

but;• I do no know how to say what I feel in my heart;• You taught me all about reproduction in rats, but;• I don’t know how to avoid pregnancy;• You taught me how to solve maths problems, but;• I still can’t solve my own problems;• Yes, you taught me many facts, and thank you, I am now

quite clever, but;• Why is it that I feel I know nothing? Why do I feel I have to

leave school to go and learn about coping with life?

Page 35: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

35

Essence of being a TeacherQuickTime™ and a

YUV420 codec decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 36: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

36

Homework Task 1.1• Calculate the amount of learners who entered

(Gr.1 or Gr.8) your school over the last five years (2004 - 2008);

• Calculate the amount of learners who successfully left your school at your highest exit grade (Gr.7 or Gr.12) during the last five years;- those who are all passing;- those who achieve a 60% and more.

• Based on the above-mentioned figures, calculate the ‘Success-rate’ of your school.

Page 37: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

37

Success rate = 8,1%

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

•Success-rate of the system = 8,1%•Of every 12 learners starting Grade One, only 1 learner attains what the system is promising them - data 2005!

Page 38: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

38

Homework Task 1.2• Bring along a list of all your teachers with the following information:

- their age;- their qualifications (professional and academic); - their trained specialisation(s);- their teaching experiences in the different grades and subjects;- their % of success in these grades and subjects;- their current teaching load in % (grade and subject).

• Bring along a summary of your learners, stating the following;- different grades and subjects within these grades;- the % passes in these grades and subjects;- link the teachers in first list to the grades and subjects.

• Bring along 5 photos that represent the ‘true’ image of your school.

Page 39: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

39

Quote of the Day!

You can’t dothings differently

until you seethings differently.

Page 40: UP ACE  MTL Unit 1 Session 1

40

Contact details:

• E-mail: [email protected];

• Fax: 0866720520

• Cell: 0828229494 (only emergencies)

• Powerpoint website: www.slideshare.net