unpublished · pdf filecheryl walton, attorney; ... prince william county regional adult...

3

Click here to load reader

Upload: hadung

Post on 14-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UNPUBLISHED · PDF fileCHERYL WALTON, Attorney; ... Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center; BRANT, Correctional Officer; TED BODIE,

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6437

DEREK CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Attorney General; PAUL EBERT, Esquire, Commonwealth Attorney; JEANICE WEITHOP, Esq. Asst. Commonwealth Attorney; ANGELA HORAN, County Attorney; COLONEL MELETUS, Superintendent; CHERYL ANN WALTON, CAC; CAPTAIN GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security; CHARLIE DEAN, Chief of Police; HEATHER DARLING, Detective; SERGEANT BREWER, Deputy Sheriff; OFFICER PEACEMAKER, Deputy Sheriff; CAROLYN OLIVER, Social Worker II; SERGEANT LAUREL WHITAKER, Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees, and CHERYL WALTON, Attorney; UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center; BRANT, Correctional Officer; TED BODIE, Attorney, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00296-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 13-6437 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/23/2013 Pg: 1 of 3

Page 2: UNPUBLISHED · PDF fileCHERYL WALTON, Attorney; ... Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center; BRANT, Correctional Officer; TED BODIE,

2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Curtis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6437 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/23/2013 Pg: 2 of 3

Page 3: UNPUBLISHED · PDF fileCHERYL WALTON, Attorney; ... Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center; BRANT, Correctional Officer; TED BODIE,

3

PER CURIAM:

Derek Curtis appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Curtis v. Cuccinelli, No. 1:12-cv-00296-

CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 19 & entered Feb. 21, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 13-6437 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/23/2013 Pg: 3 of 3