university of louisville employee satisfaction survey presented by dey systems, inc
TRANSCRIPT
University of LouisvilleUniversity of LouisvilleEmployee Satisfaction SurveyEmployee Satisfaction Survey
Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.
2
Table of Contents
Return Rates ……………………………………………..
Demographics ……………………………………………
Highest Scores ………………………………………….
Lowest Scores ………………………………………….
Overall Satisfaction Questions ………………………..
Highest Impact Questions …………………………….
Comparison: Faculty vs. Staff …………………………
Comparison: Males vs. Females ……………………..
Internal Benchmarks Faculty Units …………………..
Internal Benchmarks Staff Units ………………………
3
5
12
20
28
31
40
42
48
72
3
Return Rates Overall
4,530 Distributed4,530 Distributed
• 1,777 Faculty1,777 Faculty• 2,753 Staff2,753 Staff
2,113 Returned2,113 Returned
46.6% Return Rate46.6% Return Rate 1.45% Margin of 1.45% Margin of ErrorError
• 729 Faculty729 Faculty• 1,384 Staff1,384 Staff
• 41.0% Faculty41.0% Faculty• 50.3% Staff50.3% Staff
• 2.29% Faculty2.29% Faculty• 1.87% Staff1.87% Staff
April 17, 2000April 17, 2000 by June 5, 2000by June 5, 2000
4
Return Rates by Unit
Nursing 14 13 92.9%Speed School 60 38 63.3%Business & Public Admin. 79 50 63.3%University Libraries System 78 47 60.3%Kent School 19 11 57.9%Arts & Sciences 129 73 56.6%Law 23 13 56.5%Allied Health Sciences 11 6 54.5%Medicine 845 416 49.2%Music 14 6 42.9%Education 47 20 42.6%Dentistry 109 42 38.5% University Relations 32 25 78.1%Research Administration 22 15 68.2%UCCPE 19 12 63.2%Provost’s Office 27 17 63.0%Student Affairs 163 96 58.9%President’s Office 53 30 56.6%Finance & Administration 193 102 52.8%Development & Alumni 56 28 50.0%Information Technology 198 94 47.5%Intercollegiate Athletics 152 61 40.1%Physical Plant 389 138 35.5%
Staff Survey
Law 28 23 82.1%University Libraries System 37 25 67.6%Allied Health Sciences 36 18 50.0%Nursing 30 15 50.0% Education 131 61 46.6%Speed School 89 41 46.1%Kent School 39 16 41.0%Dentistry 125 51 40.8% Arts & Sciences 466 180 38.6%Medicine 606 225 37.1% Music 58 21 36.2% Business & Public Admin. 107 35 32.7%
Faculty Survey
Note: Sample / Return sizes at or below 5 have not been included
Academic Unit Sent Ret. Percent Unit Sent Ret. Percent
5
Demographic CharacteristicsAll University Respondents
Length of Service
< 15%
6 to 1017%
1 to 319%
4 to 510%
> 1532%
11 to 1517%
Gender
Female59%
Male41%
EthnicityWhite87%
Asian / Pacific Island3%
African American
8%Hispanic Surname
1%
Other1% American
Indian<1%
Expectation of Future with U of L
< 13%
1 to 39%
11 to 158%
4 to 1022%
Until Retire51%
> 157%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
6
Demographic CharacteristicsFull-Time Faculty Respondents (83%)
Length of Service
6 to 1017%
4 to 58%
1 to 313%
< 13%
> 1543%
11 to 1516%
EthnicityWhite89%
Asian / Pacific Island5%
African American
3%Hispanic Surname
2%
Other1%
Expectation of Future with U of L
4 to 1025%
11 to 159%
1 to 39%
< 12%
Until Retire48%
> 157%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Gender
Female31%
Male69%
7
Demographic CharacteristicsFull-Time Faculty Respondents (83%)
PositionTenured
71%
Non-Tenured
26%Research
Prof.1%
Other Acad. Appt.2%
Other1%
Highest Level of Education
Ph.D.78%
Assoc.<1%
Masters9%
Prof. Deg.13%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Rank at U of L
Other1%
Prof.44%
Assoc. Prof.31%
Asst. Prof.21% Lecturer
1% Instructor2%
8
Demographic CharacteristicsPart-Time Faculty Respondents (15%)
Length of Service
6 to 1022%
4 to 514%
1 to 321%
< 17%
> 1523%
11 to 1512%
EthnicityWhite94%
Asian / Pacific Island1%
African American
2%Hispanic Surname
2%
Other1%
Expectation of Future with U of L
4 to 1036% 11 to 15
14%
1 to 315% < 1
7%
Until Retire21%
> 156%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Gender
Female53%
Male47%
9
Demographic CharacteristicsPart-Time Faculty Respondents (15%)
Position
Tenured59%
Non-Tenured
32%Research
Prof.2%
Other Acad. Appt.4%
Other3%
Highest Level of Education
Prof. Deg.13%
Some Grad.9%
BA/BS3%
Masters39%
Ph.D.36%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Rank at U of L
Other5%
Prof.5%
Assoc. Prof.7%
Asst. Prof.11%
Lecturer47%
Instructor26%
10
Demographic CharacteristicsAll Staff Respondents
Length of Service
6 to 1016%4 to 5
10%
1 to 322%
< 16%
> 1529%
11 to 1517%
EthnicityWhite86%
Asian / Pacific Island2%
African American
11%Hispanic Surname
<1%
Other1% American
Indian<1%
Expectation of Future with U of L
< 13%
1 to 39%
11 to 157%4 to 10
20%
Until Retire55%
> 157%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Gender
Female71%
Male29%
11
Demographic CharacteristicsAll Staff Respondents
Family StatusFamily w/
Dep.42%
Family w/o Dep.23% Single w/
Dep.10%
Single w/o Dep.25%
Job Type
Admin.10%
Prof. & Admin.
49%
Classified41%
Highest Level of Education
Ph.D.4%
BA/BS27%
Less than HS
<1%
HS/GED31%
Assoc.15%
Prof. Deg.4%
Masters18%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
Shift WorkedDay97%
Rotating1%
Evening1%Night
1%
12
Questions Receiving Highest Average ScoresUniversity Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00You are Encouraged to BehaveEthically in Job
Chair/Dean/SupervisorRespects You as a Person
Your Co-workers RespectDiversity
You Like Your Job at U of L
Employees Allowed to Serve onCommittees
You are Challenged by YourJob
Free to Communicate Ideas withChair/Dean/Supervisor
You Understand U of L'sBenefits Package
Your Work Space/Equipment isFree from Hazard
U of L Serves the Community
13
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Highest Average Scores
University Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You are Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
SA 522 25.05% A 1,162 55.76% N 297 14.25% D 71 3.41% SD 32 1.54% 2,084 3.99 0.82
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 688 32.93% A 964 46.15% N 222 10.63% D 123 5.89% SD 92 4.40% 2,089 3.97 1.03
Your Co-workers Respect Diversity SA 499 23.91% A 1,160 55.58% N 264 12.65% D 128 6.13% SD 36 1.72% 2,087 3.94 0.87
You Like Your Job at U of L SA 529 25.34% A 1,107 53.02% N 267 12.79% D 126 6.03% SD 59 2.83% 2,088 3.92 0.93
Employees are Allowed to Serve on Committees
SA 477 22.93% A 1,122 53.94% N 342 16.44% D 104 5.00% SD 35 1.68% 2,080 3.91 0.86
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 569 27.24% A 1,024 49.02% N 253 12.11% D 176 8.43% SD 67 3.21% 2,089 3.89 1.00
Free to Communicate Ideas with Chair/Dean/Supervisor
SA 596 28.60% A 993 47.65% N 204 9.79% D 176 8.45% SD 115 5.52% 2,084 3.85 1.09
You Understand U of L's Benefits Package
SA 257 12.34% A 1,368 65.67% N 261 12.53% D 140 6.72% SD 57 2.74% 2,083 3.78 0.85
Your Work Space/Equipment is Free from Hazard
SA 402 19.37% A 1,151 55.47% N 257 12.39% D 201 9.69% SD 64 3.08% 2,075 3.78 0.97
U of L Serves the Community SA 234 11.27% A 1,273 61.32% N 432 20.81% D 103 4.96% SD 34 1.64% 2,076 3.76 0.78
14
Questions Receiving Highest Average ScoresFull-Time Faculty Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00Employees Allowed to Serve onCommittees
You are Challenged by YourJob
You are Encouraged to BehaveEthically in Job
Your Co-workers RespectDiversity
Chair/Dean/SupervisorRespects You as a Person
University Practices AffirmativeAction
You Understand U of L'sMission
You Understand U of L'sBenefits Package
You Like Your Job at U of L
Can Exercise AcademicFreedom at U of L
15
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
Employees Allowed to Serve on Committees
SA 193 34.04% A 316 55.73% N 39 6.88% D 18 3.17% SD 1 0.18% 567 4.20 0.72
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 178 31.45% A 287 50.71% N 61 10.78% D 30 5.30% SD 10 1.77% 566 4.05 0.89
You are Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
SA 136 24.11% A 297 52.66% N 91 16.13% D 25 4.43% SD 15 2.66% 564 3.91 0.90
Your Co-workers Respect Diversity SA 135 23.77% A 309 54.40% N 75 13.20% D 35 6.16% SD 14 2.46% 568 3.91 0.91
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 168 29.84% A 249 44.23% N 62 11.01% D 42 7.46% SD 42 7.46% 563 3.82 1.16
University Practices Affirmative Action SA 98 17.56% A 305 54.66% N 109 19.53% D 31 5.56% SD 15 2.69% 558 3.79 0.89
You Understand U of L's Mission SA 75 13.35% A 349 62.10% N 82 14.59% D 41 7.30% SD 15 2.67% 562 3.76 0.87
You Understand U of L's Benefits Package
SA 64 11.35% A 371 65.78% N 73 12.94% D 38 6.74% SD 18 3.19% 564 3.75 0.86
You Like Your Job at U of L SA 123 21.93% A 269 47.95% N 98 17.47% D 47 8.38% SD 24 4.28% 561 3.75 1.03
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
SA 80 14.16% A 336 59.47% N 91 16.11% D 31 5.49% SD 27 4.78% 565 3.73 0.94
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Highest Average Scores
Full-Time Faculty Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
16
Questions Receiving Highest Average ScoresPart-Time Faculty Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00You Like Your Job at U of L
Your Co-workers RespectDiversity
You are Encouraged to BehaveEthically in Job
You are Challenged by YourJob
Chair/Dean/SupervisorRespects You as a Person
Workspace/Equipment is Freefrom Hazard
Workload Allows a High Quality Job
U of L is Non-discriminatory toEmployees
Can Exercise AcademicFreedom at U of L
U of L Serves the Community
17
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You Like Your Job at U of L SA 43 40.95% A 52 49.52% N 5 4.76% D 3 2.86% SD 2 1.90% 105 4.25 0.83
Your Co-workers Respect Diversity SA 36 33.96% A 56 52.83% N 4 3.77% D 8 7.55% SD 2 1.89% 106 4.09 0.92
You are Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
SA 28 26.42% A 61 57.55% N 13 12.26% D 3 2.83% SD 1 0.94% 106 4.06 0.77
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 33 31.13% A 56 52.83% N 7 6.60% D 6 5.66% SD 4 3.77% 106 4.02 0.98
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 29 27.62% A 51 48.57% N 15 14.29% D 6 5.71% SD 4 3.81% 105 3.90 1.00
Workspace/Equipment is Free from Hazard
SA 19 18.45% A 61 59.22% N 15 14.56% D 6 5.83% SD 2 1.94% 103 3.86 0.85
Workload Allows a High Quality Job SA 18 17.31% A 64 61.54% N 8 7.69% D 12 11.54% SD 2 1.92% 104 3.81 0.93
U of L is Non-discriminatory to Employees
SA 21 19.81% A 56 52.83% N 19 17.92% D 8 7.55% SD 2 1.89% 106 3.81 0.91
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
SA 17 16.04% A 61 57.55% N 16 15.09% D 11 10.38% SD 1 0.94% 106 3.77 0.88
U of L Serves the Community SA 13 12.75% A 62 60.78% N 17 16.67% D 7 6.86% SD 3 2.94% 102 3.74 0.88
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Highest Average Scores
Part-Time Faculty Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
18
Questions Receiving Highest Average ScoresStaff Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00Chair/Dean/SupervisorRespects You as a Person
You are Encouraged to BehaveEthically in Job
You Like Your Job at thisUniversity
Free to Communicate Ideas withChair/Dean/Supervisor
Your Co-workers RespectDiversity
You Understand U of L'sBenefits Package
Your Co-workers Work as aTeam
Chair/Dean/SupervisorEvaluates Work Fairly
You are Challenged by YourJob
Your Work Space/Equipment isFree from Hazard
19
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 478 34.74% A 644 46.80% N 142 10.32% D 70 5.09% SD 42 3.05% 1,376 4.05 0.96
You are Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
SA 345 25.20% A 783 57.20% N 185 13.51% D 42 3.07% SD 14 1.02% 1,369 4.02 0.78
You Like Your Job at this University SA 351 25.49% A 766 55.63% N 158 11.47% D 71 5.16% SD 31 2.25% 1,377 3.97 0.88
Free to Communicate Ideas with Chair/Dean/Supervisor
SA 421 30.71% A 675 49.23% N 128 9.34% D 92 6.71% SD 55 4.01% 1,371 3.96 1.01
Your Co-workers Respect Diversity SA 312 22.81% A 775 56.65% N 181 13.23% D 81 5.92% SD 19 1.39% 1,368 3.94 0.85
You Understand U of L's Benefits Package
SA 182 13.24% A 943 68.58% N 137 9.96% D 83 6.04% SD 30 2.18% 1,375 3.85 0.80
Your Co-workers Work as a Team SA 385 28.08% A 625 45.59% N 175 12.76% D 136 9.92% SD 50 3.65% 1,371 3.85 1.05
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Evaluates Work Fairly
SA 328 23.94% A 725 52.92% N 136 9.93% D 108 7.88% SD 73 5.33% 1,370 3.82 1.05
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 347 25.29% A 657 47.89% N 184 13.41% D 133 9.69% SD 51 3.72% 1,372 3.81 1.04
Your Work Space/Equipment is Free from Hazard
SA 282 20.63% A 765 55.96% N 137 10.02% D 140 10.24% SD 43 3.15% 1,367 3.81 0.98
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Highest Average Scores
Staff Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
20
Questions Receiving Lowest Average ScoresUniversity Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00You are Paid Fairly Relative toYour Responsibilities
You are Paid Fairly Relative toYour Experience
Salary Increases areDetermined Fairly
Admin. Gives High Priority toEmp. Satisfaction
Benefited from MentoringOpportunity
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Chances for Advancement areGood
Dept. Staffed to Cover RegularWorkload
Working Conditions haveImproved in 5 Years
Admin. Provides StrongLeadership
21
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You are Paid Fairly Relative to Your Responsibilities
SA 70 3.35% A 442 21.13% N 255 12.19% D 760 36.33% SD 565 27.01% 2,092 2.37 1.18
You are Paid Fairly Relative to Your Experience
SA 76 3.63% A 464 22.18% N 267 12.76% D 711 33.99% SD 574 27.44% 2,092 2.41 1.21
Salary Increases are Determined Fairly SA 72 3.47% A 472 22.73% N 534 25.71% D 534 25.71% SD 465 22.39% 2,077 2.59 1.16
Admin. Gives High Priority to Emp. Satisfaction
SA 69 3.34% A 374 18.13% N 726 35.19% D 533 25.84% SD 361 17.50% 2,063 2.64 1.07
Benefited from Mentoring Opportunity SA 82 4.09% A 246 12.28% N 942 47.01% D 453 22.60% SD 281 14.02% 2,004 2.70 0.99
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 117 5.59% A 646 30.85% N 332 15.85% D 628 29.99% SD 371 17.72% 2,094 2.77 1.22
Chances for Advancement are Good SA 147 7.07% A 628 30.19% N 523 25.14% D 443 21.30% SD 339 16.30% 2,080 2.90 1.20
Dept. Staffed to Cover Regular Workload SA 170 8.13% A 738 35.29% N 244 11.67% D 617 29.51% SD 322 15.40% 2,091 2.91 1.26
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 113 5.49% A 558 27.13% N 762 37.04% D 414 20.13% SD 210 10.21% 2,057 2.98 1.05
Admin. Provides Strong Leadership SA 122 5.96% A 556 27.17% N 765 37.39% D 355 17.35% SD 248 12.12% 2,046 2.98 1.08
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Lowest Average Scores
University Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
22
Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Full-Time Faculty Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00You are Paid Fairly Relative toYour Responsibilities
Department Staffed to CoverRegular Workload
Admin. Gives High Priority toEmployee Satisfaction
Paid Fairly Relative toExperience
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Benefited from MentoringOpportunity
Salary Increases areDetermined Fairly
There is a High Priority onFaculty Success
There is Support of Faculty at U of L
Value of Benefits is Better thanAvailable Elsewhere
23
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You are Paid Fairly Relative to Your Responsibilities
SA 22 3.88% A 130 22.93% N 65 11.46% D 196 34.57% SD 154 27.16% 567 2.42 1.22
Department Staffed to Cover Regular Workload
SA 21 3.68% A 128 22.42% N 75 13.13% D 210 36.78% SD 137 23.99% 571 2.45 1.18
Admin. Gives High Priority to Employee Satisfaction
SA 13 2.32% A 89 15.89% N 182 32.50% D 142 25.36% SD 134 23.93% 560 2.47 1.09
Paid Fairly Relative to Experience SA 26 4.59% A 144 25.40% N 61 10.76% D 187 32.98% SD 149 26.28% 567 2.49 1.25
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 14 2.47% A 139 24.51% N 98 17.28% D 198 34.92% SD 118 20.81% 567 2.53 1.14
Benefited from Mentoring Opportunity SA 31 5.63% A 83 15.06% N 186 33.76% D 133 24.14% SD 118 21.42% 551 2.59 1.14
Salary Increases are Determined Fairly SA 19 3.39% A 147 26.20% N 142 25.31% D 139 24.78% SD 114 20.32% 561 2.68 1.16
There is a High Priority on Faculty Success
SA 15 2.70% A 126 22.70% N 175 31.53% D 148 26.67% SD 91 16.40% 555 2.69 1.08
There is Support of Faculty at U of L SA 13 2.32% A 164 29.23% N 163 29.06% D 132 23.53% SD 89 15.86% 561 2.79 1.10
Value of Benefits is Better than Available Elsewhere
SA 30 5.34% A 112 19.93% N 210 37.37% D 137 24.38% SD 73 12.99% 562 2.80 1.07
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Lowest Average Scores
Full-Time Faculty Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
24
Questions Receiving Lowest Average Scores Part-Time Faculty Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00Value of Benefits Higher thanAvailable Elsewhere
Chances for Advancement areGood
Paid Fairly Relative toExperience
Salary Increases areDetermined Fairly
Admin. Gives High Priority toEmployee Satisfaction
Paid Fairly Relative toResponsibility
Benefited from MentoringOpportunity
Working Conditions haveImproved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor SeeksInput for Decisions
Understand U of L's BenefitsPackage
25
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsewhere
SA 1 1.01% A 14 14.14% N 36 36.36% D 25 25.25% SD 23 23.23% 99 2.44 1.03
Chances for Advancement are Good SA 3 3.06% A 17 17.35% N 35 35.71% D 19 19.39% SD 24 24.49% 98 2.55 1.13
Paid Fairly Relative to Experience SA 6 5.77% A 29 27.88% N 17 16.35% D 31 29.81% SD 21 20.19% 104 2.69 1.24
Salary Increases are Determined Fairly SA 5 4.81% A 16 15.38% N 48 46.15% D 18 17.31% SD 17 16.35% 104 2.75 1.06
Admin. Gives High Priority to Employee Satisfaction
SA 3 2.94% A 16 15.69% N 51 50.00% D 18 17.65% SD 14 13.73% 102 2.76 0.98
Paid Fairly Relative to Responsibility SA 8 7.62% A 33 31.43% N 17 16.19% D 27 25.71% SD 20 19.05% 105 2.83 1.27
Benefited from Mentoring Opportunity SA 12 11.88% A 10 9.90% N 47 46.53% D 20 19.80% SD 12 11.88% 101 2.90 1.12
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 3 2.91% A 26 25.24% N 47 45.63% D 15 14.56% SD 12 11.65% 103 2.93 0.99
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Seeks Input for Decisions
SA 8 7.69% A 29 27.88% N 32 30.77% D 19 18.27% SD 16 15.38% 104 2.94 1.18
Understand U of L's Benefits Package SA 5 4.90% A 30 29.41% N 43 42.16% D 16 15.69% SD 8 7.84% 102 3.08 0.98
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Lowest Average Scores
Part-Time Faculty Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
26
Questions Receiving Lowest Average ScoresStaff Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
You are Paid Fairly Relative toYour Responsibilities
You are Paid Fairly Relative toYour Experience
Salary Increases areDetermined Fairly
Admin. Gives High Priority toEmp. Satisfaction
Benefited from MentoringOpportunity
Chances for Advancement areGood
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Admin. Provides StrongLeadership
Promotions/Job Reviews areFair
Working Conditions haveImproved in 5 Years
27
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You are Paid Fairly Relative to Your Responsibilities
SA 38 2.76% A 265 19.27% N 166 12.07% D 527 38.33% SD 379 27.56% 1,375 2.31 1.15
You are Paid Fairly Relative to Your Experience
SA 42 3.05% A 277 20.13% N 181 13.15% D 485 35.25% SD 391 28.42% 1,376 2.34 1.17
Salary Increases are Determined Fairly SA 47 3.43% A 294 21.46% N 334 24.38% D 371 27.08% SD 324 23.65% 1,370 2.54 1.17
Admin. Gives High Priority to Emp. Satisfaction
SA 51 3.76% A 257 18.92% N 481 35.42% D 366 26.95% SD 203 14.95% 1,358 2.70 1.06
Benefited from Mentoring Opportunity SA 35 2.68% A 144 11.01% N 696 53.21% D 289 22.09% SD 144 11.01% 1,308 2.72 0.90
Chances for Advancement are Good SA 71 5.17% A 389 28.35% N 327 23.83% D 345 25.15% SD 240 17.49% 1,372 2.79 1.18
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 85 6.18% A 439 31.90% N 214 15.55% D 397 28.85% SD 241 17.51% 1,376 2.80 1.23
Admin. Provides Strong Leadership SA 74 5.50% A 332 24.68% N 536 39.85% D 257 19.11% SD 146 10.86% 1,345 2.95 1.04
Promotions/Job Reviews are Fair SA 108 7.92% A 446 32.70% N 336 24.63% D 280 20.53% SD 194 14.22% 1,364 3.00 1.19
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 73 5.41% A 371 27.48% N 536 39.70% D 257 19.04% SD 113 8.37% 1,350 3.03 1.01
Survey ResponsesQuestions Receiving Lowest Average Scores
Staff Totals
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
28
Would Recommend U of L for Education
Strongly Agree11%
Strongly Disagree
6%Disagree
13%
Neither22%
Agree49%
Would Recommend U of Lfor Employment
Strongly Agree10%
Agree47%
Neither22%
Disagree14%
Strongly Disagree
6%
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Strongly Disagree
5%Disagree
10%
Neither25%
Agree49%
Strongly Agree10%
Overall Satisfaction QuestionsUniversity Totals
Totals rounded to nearest percent
You Like Your Job at U of L
Strongly Agree25%
Agree53%
Neither13%
Disagree6%
Strongly Disagree
3%
29
Would Recommend U of Lfor Employment
Strongly Agree6%
Agree40%
Neither28%
Disagree18%Strongly
Disagree9%
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Strongly Disagree
10%Disagree
14%
Neither26%
Agree40%
Strongly Agree9%
Overall Satisfaction QuestionsAll Faculty Totals
Would Recommend U of L for Education
Strongly Agree7%
Strongly Disagree
11%
Disagree18%
Neither29%Agree
35%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
You Like Your Job at U of L
Strongly Agree25%
Agree48%
Neither15%
Disagree8%
Strongly Disagree
4%
30
Would Recommend U of Lfor Employment
Strongly Agree12%
Agree51%
Neither20%
Disagree13%
Strongly Disagree
5%
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Strongly Disagree
3% Disagree8%
Neither24%
Agree53%
Strongly Agree11%
Overall Satisfaction QuestionsAll Staff Totals
Would Recommend U of L for Education
Strongly Agree13%
Strongly Disagree
3%Disagree
10%
Neither18%
Agree56%
Totals rounded to nearest percent
You Like Your Job at U of L
Strongly Agree25%
Agree56%
Neither11%
Disagree5%
Strongly Disagree
2%
31
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
Beta
You are Challenged by Your Job
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Evaluates Work Fairly
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Co-w orkers Work as a Team
Questions with Highest Impacton Overall Satisfaction
University Totals
R-Square = 51.2%
N = 2,113
Note: Top 10 of 13 identified factors
As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis
Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”
32
Average Scores for Key IndicatorsUniversity Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00 You Like Your Job at U of L
Would Recommend U of L forEducationWould Recommend U of L forEmploymentOverall, Welcomed and Encouragedat U of LYou are Challenged by Your Job
Workload Allows a High Quality Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects Youas a PersonEmployees' Attitude to U of L isPositiveWorking Conditions have Improved in 5 YearsChances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor EvaluatesWork FairlyBelieve U of L's Image is Improving
Co-workers Work as a Team
“Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.
33
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You like Your Job at U of L SA 529 25.34% A 1,107 53.02% N 267 12.79% D 126 6.03% SD 59 2.83% 2,088 3.92 0.93
Would Recommend U of L for Education SA 220 10.61% A 1,016 49.01% N 459 22.14% D 263 12.69% SD 115 5.55% 2,073 3.46 1.02
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
SA 200 9.62% A 983 47.31% N 465 22.38% D 300 14.44% SD 130 6.26% 2,078 3.40 1.05
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
SA 215 10.34% A 1,024 49.25% N 515 24.77% D 217 10.44% SD 108 5.19% 2,079 3.49 0.99
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 569 27.24% A 1,024 49.02% N 253 12.11% D 176 8.43% SD 67 3.21% 2,089 3.89 1.00
Workload Allows a High Quality Job SA 196 9.40% A 945 45.32% N 304 14.58% D 483 23.17% SD 157 7.53% 2,085 3.26 1.14
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 117 5.59% A 646 30.85% N 332 15.85% D 628 29.99% SD 371 17.72% 2,094 2.77 1.22
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 688 32.93% A 964 46.15% N 222 10.63% D 123 5.89% SD 92 4.40% 2,089 3.97 1.03
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive SA 111 7.07% A 778 49.59% N 470 29.96% D 22 1.40% SD 188 11.98% 1,569 3.03 1.10
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 113 5.49% A 558 27.13% N 762 37.04% D 414 20.13% SD 210 10.21% 2,057 2.98 1.05
Chances for Advancement are Good SA 147 7.07% A 628 30.19% N 523 25.14% D 443 21.30% SD 339 16.30% 2,080 2.90 1.20
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Evaluates Work Fairly
SA 464 22.23% A 1,046 50.12% N 252 12.07% D 191 9.15% SD 134 6.42% 2,087 3.73 1.10
Believe U of L's Image is Improving SA 215 10.31% A 1,195 57.31% N 449 21.53% D 177 8.49% SD 49 2.35% 2,085 3.65 0.86
Co-workers Work as a Team SA 522 24.98% A 926 44.31% N 289 13.83% D 247 11.82% SD 106 5.07% 2,090 3.72 1.11
Scores for Key IndicatorsUniversity Totals
34
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
Beta
You are Challenged by Your Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
R-Square = 58.5%
N = 729
Note: All factors shown
Questions with Highest Impacton Overall Satisfaction
All Faculty Totals
As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis
Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”
35
Average Scores for Key IndicatorsAll Faculty Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00 You Like Your Job at U of L
Would Recommend U of L forEducationWould Recommend U of L forEmploymentOverall, Welcomed and Encouragedat U of LYou are Challenged by Your Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L isPositiveThere is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in JobChair/Dean/Supervisor GivesRecognition for Your WorkWorking Conditions have Improved in 5 YearsCan Exercise Academic Freedom at U of LThere is a High Priority on StudentSuccessQuality and Service are Important to U of LDepartment Chair Provides StrongLeadership
“Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.
36
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You Like Your Job at U of L SA 178 25.04% A 341 47.96% N 109 15.33% D 55 7.74% SD 28 3.94% 711 3.82 1.02
Would Recommend U of L for Education SA 47 6.61% A 249 35.02% N 208 29.25% D 127 17.86% SD 80 11.25% 711 3.08 1.11
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
SA 41 5.75% A 283 39.69% N 198 27.77% D 128 17.95% SD 63 8.84% 713 3.16 1.07
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
SA 66 9.24% A 288 40.34% N 189 26.47% D 103 14.43% SD 68 9.52% 714 3.25 1.11
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 222 30.96% A 367 51.19% N 69 9.62% D 43 6.00% SD 16 2.23% 717 4.03 0.92
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive SA 35 4.83% A 252 34.81% N 160 22.10% D 187 25.83% SD 90 12.43% 724 2.94 1.14
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 32 4.46% A 207 28.83% N 118 16.43% D 231 32.17% SD 130 18.11% 718 2.69 1.19
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job SA 177 24.76% A 379 53.01% N 112 15.66% D 29 4.06% SD 18 2.52% 715 3.93 0.89
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
SA 120 16.76% A 271 37.85% N 121 16.90% D 122 17.04% SD 82 11.45% 716 3.31 1.26
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 40 5.66% A 187 26.45% N 226 31.97% D 157 22.21% SD 97 13.72% 707 2.88 1.12
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
SA 107 14.99% A 416 58.26% N 118 16.53% D 42 5.88% SD 31 4.34% 714 3.74 0.93
There is a High Priority on Student Success
SA 37 5.28% A 253 36.09% N 218 31.10% D 127 18.12% SD 66 9.42% 701 3.10 1.06
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
SA 72 10.21% A 271 38.44% N 163 23.12% D 125 17.73% SD 74 10.50% 705 3.20 1.16
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
SA 174 24.47% A 225 31.65% N 122 17.16% D 73 10.27% SD 117 16.46% 711 3.37 1.39
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
Scores for Key IndicatorsAll Faculty Totals
37
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
Beta
You are Challenged by Your Job
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Chances for Advancement are Good
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
R-Square = 49.8%
N = 1,384
Note: Top 10 of 13 identified factors
Questions with Highest Impacton Overall Satisfaction
All Staff Totals
As determined through Multiple Regression Analysis
Regressed against the dependent variable: “You Like Your Job at U of L”
38
Average Scores for Key Indicators All Staff Totals
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00 You Like Your Job at U of L
Would Recommend U of L forEducationWould Recommend U of L forEmploymentOverall, Welcomed and Encouragedat U of LYou are Challenged by Your Job
Workload Allows a High Quality Job
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects Youas a PersonChances for Advancement are Good
Working Conditions have Improved in5 YearsBelieve U of L's Image is Improving
Encouraged to Participate inDecisionsValue of Benefits Higher thanAvailable ElsewhereThere is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L isPositive
“Key Indicators” are the four Overall Satisfaction questions and the top 10 “Highest Impact” questions.
39
Question Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count % Label Count %Total
RespondAverage
ScoreStd
You Like Your Job at U of L SA 351 25.49% A 766 55.63% N 158 11.47% D 71 5.16% SD 31 2.25% 1,377 3.97 0.88
Would Recommend U of L for Education SA 173 12.70% A 767 56.31% N 251 18.43% D 136 9.99% SD 35 2.57% 1,362 3.67 0.91
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
SA 159 11.65% A 700 51.28% N 267 19.56% D 172 12.60% SD 67 4.91% 1,365 3.52 1.01
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
SA 149 10.92% A 736 53.92% N 326 23.88% D 114 8.35% SD 40 2.93% 1,365 3.62 0.89
You are Challenged by Your Job SA 347 25.29% A 657 47.89% N 184 13.41% D 133 9.69% SD 51 3.72% 1,372 3.81 1.04
Workload Allows a High Quality Job SA 133 9.69% A 647 47.16% N 192 13.99% D 312 22.74% SD 88 6.41% 1,372 3.31 1.12
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
SA 478 34.74% A 644 46.80% N 142 10.32% D 70 5.09% SD 42 3.05% 1,376 4.05 0.96
Chances for Advancement are Good SA 71 5.17% A 389 28.35% N 327 23.83% D 345 25.15% SD 240 17.49% 1,372 2.79 1.18
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
SA 73 5.40% A 374 27.64% N 536 39.62% D 257 18.99% SD 113 8.35% 1,353 3.03 1.01
Believe U of L's Image is Improving SA 137 9.99% A 820 59.77% N 304 22.16% D 97 7.07% SD 14 1.02% 1,372 3.71 0.78
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions SA 175 12.75% A 659 48.00% N 204 14.86% D 232 16.90% SD 103 7.50% 1,373 3.42 1.13
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsewhere
SA 218 15.87% A 529 38.50% N 383 27.87% D 165 12.01% SD 79 5.75% 1,374 3.47 1.07
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job SA 85 6.18% A 439 31.90% N 214 15.55% D 397 28.85% SD 241 17.51% 1,376 2.80 1.23
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive SA 76 5.52% A 526 38.23% N 310 22.53% D 366 26.60% SD 98 7.12% 1,376 3.08 1.07
SA = Strongly Agree A = Agree N = Neither Agree/Disagree D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree
Scores for Key IndicatorsAll Staff Totals
40
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Co-workers Work as a Team
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Evaulates Work Fairly
Chances for Advancement are Good
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Workload Allows a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Faculty
Staff
Faculty vs. Staff ComparisonKey Indicator Questions
Responses shown as an average score
41
Faculty vs. Staff ComparisonKey Indicator Questions
42
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
University Totals
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Co-workers Work as a Team
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Evaulates Work Fairly
Chances for Advancement are Good
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Workload Allows a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Males
Females
Responses shown as an average score
43
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
University Totals
44
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
Faculty Totals
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Males
Females
45
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
Faculty Totals
46
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
Staff Totals
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Males
Females
47
Males vs. FemalesKey Indicator Questions
Staff Totals
48
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Allied Health Sciences Faculty
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Allied Health Faculty
All Faculty
All University
49
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Allied Health Sciences Faculty
50
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Arts & Sciences Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
A & S Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
51
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Arts & Sciences Faculty
52
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Business & Public Administration Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
B & PA Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
53
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Business & Public Administration Faculty
54
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Dentistry Faculty
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Dentistry Faculty
All Faculty
All University
55
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Dentistry Faculty
56
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Education Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Education Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
57
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Education Faculty
58
Internal BenchmarkKent School of Social Work Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Kent School Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
59
Internal BenchmarkKent School of Social Work Faculty
60
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Law Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Law Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
61
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Law Faculty
62
Internal BenchmarkLibraries Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Libraries Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
63
Internal BenchmarkLibraries Faculty
64
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Medicine Faculty
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Medicine Faculty
All Faculty
All University
65
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Medicine Faculty
66
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Music Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Music Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
67
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Music Faculty
68
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Nursing Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Nursing Faculty
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
69
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Nursing Faculty
70
Internal BenchmarkSpeed Scientific School Faculty
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Department Chair Provides Strong Leadership
Quality and Service are Important to U of L
There is a High Priority on Student Success
Can Exercise Academic Freedom at U of L
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Gives Recognition for Your Work
Encouraged to Behave Ethically in Job
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Speed Scientific School
All Faculty
All University
Responses shown as an average score
71
Internal BenchmarkSpeed Scientific School Faculty
72
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Arts & Sciences Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
A & S Staff
All Staff
All University
73
Internal BenchmarkCollege of Arts & Sciences Staff
74
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Business & Public Administration Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
B & PA Staff
All Staff
All University
75
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Business & Public Administration Staff
76
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Dentistry Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Dentistry Staff
All Staff
All University
77
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Dentistry Staff
78
Internal BenchmarkDevelopment and Alumni Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Dev. & Alumni
All Staff
All University
79
Internal BenchmarkDevelopment and Alumni Staff
80
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Education Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Education Staff
All Staff
All University
81
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Education Staff
82
Internal BenchmarkFinance and Administration Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Finance & Admin.
All Staff
All University
83
Internal BenchmarkFinance and Administration Staff
84
Internal BenchmarkInformation Technology Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Information Technology
All Staff
All University
85
Internal BenchmarkInformation Technology Staff
86
Internal BenchmarkIntercollegiate Athletics Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Intercollegiate Athletics
All Staff
All University
87
Internal BenchmarkIntercollegiate Athletics Staff
88
Internal BenchmarkKent School of Social Work Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Kent School Staff
All Staff
All University
89
Internal BenchmarkKent School of Social Work Staff
90
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Law Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Law Staff
All Staff
All University
91
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Law Staff
92
Internal BenchmarkLibraries Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Libraries Staff
All Staff
All University
93
Internal BenchmarkLibraries Staff
94
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Medicine Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Medicine Staff
All Staff
All University
95
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Medicine Staff
96
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Nursing Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Nursing Staff
All Staff
All University
97
Internal BenchmarkSchool of Nursing Staff
98
Internal BenchmarkPhysical Plant Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Physical Plant
All Staff
All University
99
Internal BenchmarkPhysical Plant Staff
100
Internal BenchmarkPresident’s Office Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
President's Office Staff
All Staff
All University
101
Internal BenchmarkPresident’s Office Staff
102
Internal BenchmarkProvost’s Office Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Provost's Off ice
All Staff
All University
103
Internal BenchmarkProvost’s Office Staff
104
Internal BenchmarkResearch Administration Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Research Administration
All Staff
All University
105
Internal BenchmarkResearch Administration Staff
106
Internal BenchmarkSpeed Scientific School Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Speed Scientif ic School
All Staff
All University
107
Internal BenchmarkSpeed Scientific School Staff
108
Internal BenchmarkStudent Affairs Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
Student Affairs
All Staff
All University
109
Internal BenchmarkStudent Affairs Staff
110
Internal BenchmarkUCCPE Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
UCCPE Staff
All Staff
All University
111
Internal BenchmarkUCCPE Staff
112
Internal BenchmarkUniversity Relations Staff
Responses shown as an average score
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Employees' Attitude to U of L is Positive
There is Not Too Much Stress in Job
Value of Benefits Higher than Available Elsew here
Encouraged to Participate in Decisions
Believe U of L's Image is Improving
Working Conditions have Improved in 5 Years
Chances for Advancement are Good
Chair/Dean/Supervisor Respects You as a Person
Workload Allow s a High Quality Job
You are Challenged by Your Job
Overall, Welcomed and Encouraged at U of L
Would Recommend U of L for Employment
Would Recommend U of L for Education
You Like Your Job at U of L
University Relations
All Staff
All University
113
Internal BenchmarkUniversity Relations Staff