unfccc workshop on national systems bonn, april 2005 jean-pierre fontelle current situation in...

UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems Bonn, April 2005

Jean-Pierre Fontelle

Current situation in France concerning the National Emission

Inventory System

Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d’Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique

7, cité Paradis – 75010 PARIS – www.citepa.org

Plan

Organisation

Planning

QA/QC plan

Inventory development

Improvements

Response to ERT comments

UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005

National emission inventory system

SNIEPA (Système National d’Inventaire des Emissions de Polluants dans l’Atmosphère)

The single national inventory system covers all national air emission inventories (ie for UN and EC purposes) and other national needs

The Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development (MEDD) is the national authority responsible for managing this issue

CITEPA is responsible for inventory compilation for all source categories, technical discussion with international organisations, assists the MEDD in coordinating activities, provides facilities for dissemination (Internet)More details on National emission inventory system and methodologies

http://www.citepa.org/publications/Inventaires.htm#inv6

Various ministries and organisations (technical and research centres, statistics institutes, professional organisations, etc.) are also involved as data providers

Institutional arrangements are still under discussion to fulfil EC and UNFCCC decisions

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Overview of different steps in national system

UN and EC specifications

Statistics and other sources of information

Terms of reference

Choice of methodologies

Data identification

Data collection

Archiving

Data treatment, main results

Approval by Committee

Final reports and products

Transmission to national

authorities

Approval by authorities

Transmission to UN and EC

Publication www.citepa.org

Archiving

International review

Action plan implementation

CITEPA

Multiple organis.

National authority

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Overview of inventory planning


Inventory planning for 2005 submission

Date / deadline Item Meeting To15/04/2005 National Inventory report UNFCCC15/03/2005 National Inventory report EC20/02/2005 NIR final version delivery National Authority10/02/2005 Approval from National Authority31/01/2005 Final draft NIR National Authority

15/01/2005Main features for National Inventory report (CRF tables and part of NIR)

EC

10/01/2005Main features for National Inventory report (CRF tables and part of NIR)

National Authority

mid/12/2004 Comments from Coordination CommitteeDecember 2004 Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories X

early/12/2004Final draft inventory and main related information on changes, uncertainty, etc.

Coordination and Information Committee

on InventoriesCalculations, checks, reporting

mid/11/2004 Deadline for data compilationOctober 2004 Centralized Review of inventory by the ERT

September 2004 Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories XFrom May to November Data collection, data treatment, checks,

April 2004 Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories XReview of inventory improvement plan

mid/12/2003 Outputs from Coordination CommitteeProduct delivery Input in the system Meeting

Overview of main features of QA/QC plan

Inventory compilation based on processus and procedures driven by a quality management system (QMS)

QA/QC is operational and implemented through a QMS (CITEPA is certified ISO 9001 version 2000 for emission inventories)

The QA/QC plan focuses on improvements on an ongoing basis, especially by reducing uncertainties, by covering more substances, both in a convenient and efficient way

QA/QC plan developped according to QMS rules (ISO 9001) and includes sections on :

quality objectives,

quality control,

quality assurance,

overview of process, procedures and recording related to GPG

Documentation, archiving : stringent requirements in QMS to trace all information (including origin, primary data, assumptions, etc.) and all intermediate and final results

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Process codes

Procedures Records

1Check that assumptions and criteria for the selection of activity data and emission factors are documented.

1a

Cross-check descriptions of activity data and emission factors with information on source categories and ensure that these are properly recorded and archived

INV-Pr-04INV-Mo-40-02 + INV-Mo-

40-03FM (INV-En-403-01)

2aConfirm that bibliographical data references are properly cited in the internal documentation.

INV-Pr-04 INV-Mo-40-03 FM (INV-En-403-01)

4aCheck that units are properly labelled in calculation sheets.

4bCheck that units are correctly carried through from beginning to end of calculations

4c Check that conversion factors are correct.

4dCheck that temporal and spatial adjustment factors are used correctly.

5aConfirm that the appropriate data processing steps are correctly represented in the database.

5bConfirm that data relationships are correctly represented in the database.

5cEnsure that data fields are properly labelled and have the correct design specifications

5dEnsure that adequate documentation of database and model structure and operation are archived

6Check for consistency in data between source categories.

6a

Identify parameters (e.g. activity data, constants) that are common to multiple source categories and confirm that there is consistency in the values used for these parameters in the emissions calculations.

INV-Pr-04

Fi-SNAP (CIT-En-400-02), références des fiches

(version des FM communes utilisées) cf. FM (INV-En-403-

01)

7a

Check that emissions data are correctly aggregated from lower reporting levels to higher reporting levels when preparing summaries.

INV-Pr-07 INV-Mo-70-03INV-En-703-02

controle_requete

INV-Pr-07 INV-Mo-70-03INV-En-703-02

controle_requete

INV-Pr-08 INV-Mo-80-01 INV-En-801-03 et 04

INV-Pr-04 INV-Mo-40-03INV-En-403-04 (fiche de

contrôle)

7Check that the movement of

inventory data among processing steps is correct.

7bCheck that emissions data are correctly transcribed between different intermediate products.

CIT-Pr-06 CIT-Mo-60-01CIT-En-601-

01contrôle_applicatifs, cahier des charges + revues

Check the integrity of database files.

Check for transcription errors in data input and reference

Check that parameter and emission units are correctly recorded and that appropriate conversion factors are used.

QC activities

2

4

5

Procedures

Implementation of GPG requirements within the Management Quality System - extract

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Quality control

QC procedures are applied to all input data including those provided by statistics institutes or administrations

Priority is focussed on non validated data vs official data

Checks on input data enables a high level of reliability more than an accurate assessment of absolute values

Common QC procedures compatible with IPCC good practices are applied to the different stages in the processes

Example :

documentation, assumptions, primary calculations are compiled within « methodology files »

the national inventory system includes approximatively 140 files which cover the SNAP activities (some files deal with several SNAP codes).

Some data (activity rates, emission factors, etc. are common to several files. Mapping these files makes it possible to check interlinked consistency


C I T E P ACentre Interprofessionnel Technique d'Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique

10, rue du Faubourg Poissonnière - 75010 PARIS 040625Téléphone : +33 01 44 83 68 83 - Télécopie : +33 01 40 22 04 83

e-mail : [email protected]

FICHE METHODOLOGIQUE POURINVENTAIRES D'EMISSIONS

Référence du fichier : sucre.xlsACTIVITES :

040625 Production de sucre

Description sommaire, commentaire si nécessaire,....

Cette activité ne traite que les émissions de poussières liées à la fabrication de sucre.

Ce code SNAP n'existe pas dans la version SNAP 97.

Date Auteur Nature de la modification Relecteurs24/10/2003 NeA V-SS A-JPC

25/09/2002 GG Ajout année 2001 (report 2000); correction activité 200007/12/2001 NeA Création de la fiche - PM années 1990 à 2000 JPC

2000: report année 1999 car statistique non disponible au 5/12/01

N° SNAP 97

Il est ajouté à la liste de façon arbitraire par le CITEPA pour pouvoir prendre en compte cette activité émettrice de poussières.

Correction année 2001 disponible -2002 à 2020: report 2001; vérification années 1997 à 2000

QA

Fiches Responsable

Date d'intervention

Validation méthode

Support: NoteValidation externe

Suivi des contrôles interne

Nom Nom

Orthographe/ syntaxe Orthographe/ syntaxe

Respect des consignes Respect des consignes

Validation méthode Validation méthode

transparence transparence

cohérence cohérence

exactitude exactitude

comparabilité comparabilité

Données Données

unités unités

tendance tendance

Modules de calculs Modules de calculs

Autre Autre

Verificateur ApprobateurAC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier) AC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier)Date Date

OK (O/ N)

OK (O/ N)

SUIVI et CONTRÔLE des FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES

SupportExperts

SupportDateDate NomNomClients

External Method CHECK

CITEPA Method

and data CHECK

CITEPA Method

and data CHECK

QC

CALCULATION FILES CHECK

CHECK SHEET


ELEMENTSGranulo_PM CARFUEL Para-socio GENERAUX

GICFUEL

ELEC CHAUFURB ENG_res CIMENT Al1-2

Dtom-elec RES_TER COMB_IND VERRE Ceramic

RAFFGENRAFFXX AG_FO_AQ SIDERUR Tuil-bri

ENERGIE

CHAUX Magnesium

PARCAUTO Petits bateauxPbZn1 Ni

F-train TraitEauxRoutier

Maritim PbZn2 FonteRoute-pneu-frein

Traffluv Conso_NP PROCEDES INDUSTRIELS

Route_usureAviation

TRANSPORTS DECHETS N2O-agr

Culture ElevagePharma-dom Solvants-dom

LUC2 LUC3 N2O-agr-DT

LUC1 AGRICULTUREPeinture Nettoyage-à-sec Dégraissage

LUC Chaussures F-pain TabacPOP-UNECE BIOTIQUE

SOLVANTS AUTRES

CARTOGRAPHIE DES FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES LIEES(sorties des FM --> éléments d'entrée d'une autre FM)

GIC

INPUT / OUTPUT MAPPING BETWEEN METHODOLOGY FILES

ENERGY

INDUS. PROC.

AGRICULTURE

OTHERBIOGENIC

SOLVENTS

WASTETRANSPORTS


GENERAL

LCP

Quality control

IPCC Tier 1 requirements implemented through QMS procedures

QC checks : conducted by CITEPA and upstream compilation by statistics offices, administrations, etc. and by some experts depending on data and priorities (key sources)

Annual process cycle based on automatic and manual procedures

Examples of main check types : Main methods

Plausibility, reference range

Exhaustivity of data (activity rates, check list emission factors, documentation, etc.)

Accuracy of calculation simulation

Comparability of estimation methods analysis and reference with guidelines (UNFCCC, IPCC, EMEP/ CORINAIR, EC, WBCSD, etc.)

Trends in activity rates, emission analysis, statistical factors, emissions treatment

Consistency cross-checking

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Quality assurance

Procedures in place : CCIIE (Coordination and Information Committee on Emission Inventories) + international review (UNFCCC) + external experts (for some activities)

Other complete external reviews are expected but not yet implemented because of resources needed but not available

An action plan is progressively drawn up over time from :

• decisions taken at recent CCIIE meetings,

• events occurring during the current year,

• changes and improvements following remarks from reviews, errors, new information available

and approved / delayed / rejected by the CCIIE

Every year, final statement by early December (data sent before31st December N+1, reports available within January / March N+2

Action plan


Inventory development

Goals : satisfy terms of reference including specifications such as UNFCCC guidelines and GPG, EC recommandations

QMS procedures are applied to continuously improve the inventory (and the system)

CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF TIER LEVELS (ABSOLUTE LEVEL 2003)

90 % of 42 key sources are estimated from Tier 2 or more methods

82 % of key sources emission are estimated from Tier 2 or more methods

CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF TIER LEVELS (TREND 1990 – 2003)

90 % of 54 key sources are estimated from Tier 2 methods or more

93 % of key sources contribution are estimated from Tier 2 methods or moreUNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005

Inventory development - improvements 1 / 3

1. Identification of improvement areas

Topics previously delayed,

Feedback from UNFCCC ERT and EU GHG MM checks,

Feedback from inventory compilers (ie. checks),

Feedback from inventory users,

Feedback from non GHG inventories (verification and use) This input can be valuable by pointing out problems affecting as well relevant items for GHG inventories

-> strong interest for a single inventory system

All feedbacks pointing out problems are registered within the QMS (CITEPA is certified ISO 9001 version 2000 for emission inventories)



2. Analysis of topics

Type of issue : estimation method, complementary information, editorial, other,

Amount of emissions affected, impact on reference year, indirect impacts,

Prioritization (see below)

Prioritization : IMPROVEMENT

IF :• items identified by the ERT or other Authorities and / or, • significant gap with GPG and guidelines and / or,• existing alternative methodology significantly increasing accuracy,

AND METHODOLOGY APPLICABLE (data availability, delay for implementation, acceptable cost)

OR ELSE :• either the implementation is delayed or • longer term actions (ie. Studies, new statistics, etc.) or rejected U

NFC

CC

Work

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5


3. Proposal for modifications

Impacts of proposed changes (% of emissions affected, impact on reference year),

Technical consequences (eg. on structural changes in the SNIEPA – changes relating to reporting format),

Delay and possible implementing difficulties

Related documentation

4. Decision of CCIIE

Full agreement,

Agreement with additional considerations,

Postponed actions,

Rejection

5. Implementation

According to decision (content and delay)

April, September & December

UN

FCC

C W

ork

shop o

n N

ati

onal Syst

em

s –

Bonn,

Apri

l 2

00

5

Respond to ERT comments

Differents steps :

Arrange availability of experts to respond during the review period,

Provide explanations as quickly as possible (high priority),

Treat ERT comments as feedback in the improvement process for the next inventory release,

ERT review report is carefully analysed,

Response is provided to UNFCCC through official authority,

Communication to EC for EU inventory reporting


unfccc workshop on national systems bonn, april 2005 jean-pierre fontelle current situation in...

Documents

national systems bonn

national needs

national authorities

national authority responsible

final results unfccc

ert comments unfccc

primary data

input data