un reform and the cca / undaf process un reform and the cca / undaf process
TRANSCRIPT
UN Reform and UN Reform and the CCA / UNDAF processthe CCA / UNDAF process
Why UN Reform?
To achieve better impact
• Shared vision
• Support to country level MD/MDGs targets
• Reduced transaction cost through simplified business processes
• Improved accountability of UN system – internal and external
Triennial Comprehensive Policy Review Highlights
• Acknowledges ongoing efforts to become more coherent
• Reaffirms need to enhance UN’s relevance, effectiveness, accountability and credibility
• UNDAF as UN common programming tool
• Emphasizes national ownership
• UN orgs should further harmonize and simplify their business procedures
A more effective UN, coordinated and aligned with national priorities
Integrated approach to planning, programming and operations
• Renewed commitment to – and tools for integration between missions and UNCT
• Strengthened strategic nature and oversight of CCA / UNDAF
• Increased use of Joint Programmes (including with missions)
• Strengthened RC/UNCT performance appraisal and accountabilities
• Reduced transaction costs through common premises and HACT
IntegrationIntegrationMissions and UN Country Teams Missions and UN Country Teams
working togetherworking together
Integrating the UN’s activities in crisis countries
Security
DevelopmentAssistance
Humanitarian Aid
e.g. UNICEF, UNDP, UNFPA
e.g. WHO,UNESCO, FAO
e.g. HCR
e.g. DPKO
e.g. DPA
e.g. WFP
UNDG
e.g. OCHA
Political
Managing Complexity
• The security-political-development-humanitarian linkages:– Conflict / instability as an obstacle to development and
humanitarian access.– Development failure as a root cause of conflict and/or
humanitarian crisis.– Humanitarian crisis as fuel for conflict and obstacle to
development
• The response must be structured around this interface: – Need to identify and agree on points of intersection and
design appropriate response to the different aspects of threats to peace / conflict factors
– For the UN, supporting lasting peace requires unity of purpose Integration
Integration: structure and tools
• The DSRSG – RC – HC chain
• Agreed reporting mechanisms and roles, per SG Note of Guidance
• Integrated Mission Planning Process
• System wide commitment to integrated planning capacity
• Various levels of integration
Integration: Challenges and Lessons Learned
Challenges
- Duplication of roles- Differing cultures and perspectives on peacebuilding, absence of
common vision- Different procedures, rules, approaches and methodologies- Limited planning capacity
Lessons learned
Common vision, strategy and planning before allAchieve clarity - early on - on respective roles, mandates, and
expectationsThe “long term versus short term” fallacy: both approaches are
necessary
At your table, please:
. Discuss and ask questions, if needed, for clarification
. Discuss which aspects of UN reform are most relevant in Iraq
(10mn)
CCA/ UNDAFCCA/ UNDAFCommon Country Assessment/Common Country Assessment/
United Nations Development United Nations Development Assistance FrameworkAssistance Framework
What is a Common Country Assessment?
• In line with MD/ MDGs, international treaties and conventions ratified by the country and other international commitments
• Causal analysis – identifies root causes and their effects
• Capacity gap analysis – understand reasons for the inability of rights holders to claim rights, and duty bearers for not being able to deliver their commitments
• Conflict sensitive analysis including factors that induce emergency situations
• Complements national analytical work being done for the National Development Plan
Option A: Participation in government-led
analysis
Option B: Complementary UN supported
analysis
Option C: A full CCA
process
OPTIONS FOR CCA
National Development Planning Process
The UN’s analytical support strengthens the National development
framework to reflect the Government’s
commitments to internationally agreed
goals
What is the UNDAF?
• Strategic programme framework for the UN Country Team
• Describes collective UN response to MD/MDG related national priorities
• Demonstrates the UN Comparative advantage
• Enables strategic positioning of the UN vis-à-vis national development priorities
• Jointly developed by the UN and the host government
Guiding Principles for CCA-UNDAF
• National ownership and leadership
• Alignment with national priorities, MD/ MDGs
• Harmonization with UN and national planning process/ cycle
• Integration of Human rights into analysis and results based programming
• Mutual accountability
• Capacity development and stakeholder participation
Annual Work Annual Work PlansPlans
Agency Agency Programme Programme Documents/ Documents/ Strategies/ Strategies/
FrameworksFrameworks
ExCom Country ExCom Country Programme Programme Action Plan Action Plan
(CPAP)(CPAP)
UN UN Development Development Assistance Assistance Framework Framework
2011-14 2011-14 (UNDAF)(UNDAF)
Alignment between UNDAF & National Development Plan
Five Yr. Five Yr. National National
Development Development Plan Plan (2010-14)(2010-14)
ICI/ MDGsICI/ MDGs
The priorities in the National Development Plan (2010-14) will drive the UNDAF – the UNDAF shows the
collective response of the UNCT, and demonstrates its comparative
advantages towards national priorities
CCA UNDAF
3 - 5 Prioritiesfor UN development
co-operation
Analysis
UNDAFOutcome 2
UN Agency 1Country
ProgrammeOutcome
UN Agency 2Country
ProgrammeOutcome
Cause 1
Cause 2
UNDAFOutcome 1
Non-UNPartner
Contributions
UN Agency 1Country
ProgrammeOutput 1
UN Agency 2Country
ProgrammeOutput
UN Agency 1Country
ProgrammeOutput 2
UN Agency 3Project
Outcomesand Outputs
Assessment
Identify Challenges
Information Gathering
Short listchallenges for
development co-operation
CountryProgrammes/Projects
Natio
nal D
evelop
men
t Plan
/
ICI / M
illenn
ium
Develo
pm
ent G
oals
COMMON COUNTRY PROGRAMMING PROCESS
Key priorities for UN development
cooperation
UNDAF - Strategic focus
• Support in areas where the UNCT can make the biggest difference;
• Address root causes;• The UNCT has comparative advantage to
address the identified problems; • Sufficient resources are available, or can
be mobilized; • Alignment with key actors/stakeholders
engagement.
Our Guiding Frameworks
• Millennium Declaration and the MDG’s.
• Tri-annual Comprehensive Policy Review (TCPR) resolutions.
• Alignment with national development priorities (Iraq Five Year NDP 2010-14Iraq Five Year NDP 2010-14 )
• CCA-UNDAF Guidelines.
20